The Landmark Kesavananda Bharati Case Explained | Understanding the Basic Structure Doctrine

Join us as we explore one of the most significant cases in India's constitutional history: the Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala case. This 1973 Supreme Court judgment introduced the Basic Structure Doctrine, ensuring that while Parliament could amend the Constitution under Article 368, it could not alter its fundamental framework. Learn how this landmark decision shaped the balance of power between the Indian Parliament and the judiciary and safeguarded democratic principles.
In this session, we cover the background of the case, the key amendments (24th, 25th, and 29th), the arguments presented, and the Supreme Court's monumental verdict. Understand why the Basic Structure Doctrine has become a cornerstone of constitutional law, protecting citizens' rights and the integrity of democracy.
Explore how this case emerged from the Kerala Land Reforms Act, the role of Kesavananda Bharati, and the historical context that led to this pivotal moment in Indian legal history. Whether you’re a student, law enthusiast, or curious about India’s judicial system, this detailed breakdown provides valuable insights into why this case is considered a landmark in constitutional jurisprudence.
Don't forget to like, subscribe, and turn on notifications for more educational content on India's legal and political landscape!#KesavanandaBharati, #BasicStructureDoctrine, #IndianSupremeCourt, #ConstitutionAmendments, #LandmarkCases, #Article368, #JudicialReview, #24thAmendment, #25thAmendment, #29thAmendment, #RightToProperty, #IndianLaw, #ConstitutionalLaw, #FundamentalRights, #ParliamentVsJudiciary, #SupremeCourtHistory, #IndianDemocracy, #RuleOfLaw, #ConstitutionProtection, #LandReformsCase, #HistoricalJudgements, #LegalEducation, #CaseStudyIndia, #LawAndGovernance, #IndiaLandmarkCase