Doctrine of Basic Structure under Indian Constitution: Madras High Court Bar Association at Madurai.

[@syednaqvi2222]

Hon'ble Justice Rohinton F Nariman is a Colossus of Law. His mammoth memory is unparalleled. His speeches are mesmerizing. His knowledge of law is unmatched. He is a Genius. He is a living legend of law. Syed Naqvi Advocate Supreme Court of India.

[@sasikumarn5786]

But his little understanding made his retirement good riddance... Memory is a virtue in KBC... even though I do not agree with your opinion.

[@raaja.thalapathy]

Most certainly a misplaced understanding of Justice R.F. Nariman. Enlighten us why. @@sasikumarn5786

[@prahladdsharma3672]

He is not a genius as kesavnanda did not get relief the citizen lost and state won , how can state won if citizen looses

[@saurabhpratap9319]

Justice Nariman has a photographic memory.....he is an enigma in field of law and justice 🙏🙏

[@devidas4006]

It is both a blessing and a curse. Curse for crippling one's original thinking, blessing for easily confounding another with a reel -off from memory.

[@shyamjiki]

Enigma Man Mr.Nariman

[@karthikeco]

Hon'ble Justice Nariaman is very knowledgeable personality that the legal profession was blessed to have, the way he explains the matter and connects the historocal background is extraordinary. A true Legend.

[@prakash6727]

Absolutely stunned by this man's brilliance. Hats off!

[@ramang5400]

If Justice Nariman is a typical example of judge of the Supreme Court of India, we can be assured that Indians will have justice and the Indian Judiciary is in very safe hands

[@yushpi]

Hahaha millions of pending cases and justice is safe in their hands?

[@raaja.thalapathy]

The SC has less than 70,000 cases pending@@yushpi

[@nitinmms]

Wow... Fascinating lecture. One can only wonder at the wisdom and far sightedness of the founding fathers of our constitution. And of course the wisdom of the judiciary who subsequently have stood as the able guardians of our Constitution. 🙏🙏

[@jmarj1038]

What an interesting discourse on Indian constitution. For students of political science and law Justice Nariman's lecture is a feast. Long live his reputation.

[@Brain_Gym_Academy]

His physical similarity with Dr. B. R. Ambedkar is not just an accident if we know similar his intellectual caliber. Jai Hind 💪

[@tsrini68]

Our politicians from Panchats to state govt to Union govt in Delhi loot thousands of crores every day. But if same politicians to be given same posts in USA or EU, they cant loot 1 $. how? Even if caught none punished. Every one set free for "want" of evidence. Is this "intellectual calibre" of great constitution makers?? Worst constitution of the world.

[@sakshamthareja7772]

Justice Nariman is an institution in himself. There are only a few people who while speaking create a pictorial scene in the Listener’s mind, this talk is one such example.

[@AshokSoodSrAdv]

tttrtttt5ttt55 TT tttttttttt t555 TT ttttttttttttt try TT tttttttt tttttttt tttttttttt

[@abhishekbhushan3250]

Can’t agree more, Thareja Sahab

[@biharilalkarwa9908]

​@@abhishekbhushan32501 k. .

[@JudeGonsaalves]

​@@AshokSoodSrAdvÀÀ❤

[@kodandaramareddy8630]

A great constitutional expert and a orator in himself

[@radhakrishnamuli3356]

Absolutely fascinating...For a person like me , who is not lawyer , it smoothly explained the most important part ..' basic structure ' i have no words to express my gratitude...

[@Pokethuder]

Rohinton sir is always eloquent & erudite. Very few in India can match his acumen in India.

[@starspectrum6454]

Clarity of thought, words and action explaining rationale of constitutional Law. 🙏.

[@abhishu23]

its like wisdom is flowing to all direction, huge respect for you sir. you are an institution sir.

[@anilcare]

I was lucky to have met Sir on a few occasions for legal conferences at the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India .Saw him arguing before Ld Judges....there used to be lightening and thunder of greatest advocacy..

[@madhusudanreddy4414]

What a beautiful thought provoking lecture! Really impressive. I recollect the saying ' kingdom of thought is a proud aristocracy '

[@dnromeoalphayankee13]

All that you can't leave behind...Remembering the Album by U2. Justice Nariman, brilliant as usual 😇

[@shekhartalashilkar7063]

Justice R.F.Nariman is Always Excellent And Greatest Great personality. Thank you very much Sir.

[@rajathangarajaaero2752]

We are looking for more videos from you.. outstanding legal expert in history.

[@kashmiri318]

Great salute to Justice Khalifullah, honest, upright and great judge,

[@avprem]

Excellent lecture even a layman like me can understand and thank you sir, your explanation on preamble and basic structure brilliant, must watch...

[@subbaramjayaram6862]

Fantastic lecture on Basic structure. Justice Narimans' understanding the provisions of the Constitution is unmatchable. India is great to have this type of legal luminaries. Jayaram

[@rameshgaikwad2995]

Thank you very much, Sir for elaborative, clear and comprehensible speech. You are Legend.

[@subbarajuvegesina5143]

His Excellence Justice Nariman interpretation had been made on Constitution basic structure tremendous changes will be made judicial knowledge.

[@harshasthana4004]

Always a great pleasure to listen to Justice Nariman

[@ravindraankam8086]

Tremendous memory delivering in systematic way

[@josephkj4535]

Thank you so much great Sir.Simply stunned by your mastery over the subject and the flow of unhindered oratory. I understand you highlighted also democracy and unity in diversity in our constitution as part of basic structure. Thank you again.

[@FollowInnerGuidance]

Gem Of Legal Fraternity...!

[@elamvaluthis7268]

Vanakkam thank you . very nice orator on law experience makes him so befitting to be righthood.

[@eudee21]

Brilliant discourse. To be cherished by all students of law.

[@kirankamate9719]

Wonderful lecture!! Eloquent and insightful.

[@SanjaySharma-yz4jz]

क्या गजब की मेमोरी है वकील साहब की वाह वकील साहब, धन्यवाद 🙏🙏 इसे हिंदी र्टान्सलेटमें सुनने की इच्छा हो रही थी

[@bhimanagoudarpatil7357]

Sir is the Donald Bradman of Indian judiciary. He is a legend in the field. For me there are 2 legends in our field one the great Nani phalkivala and other the justice nariman sir.

[@sunilkirby7860]

The Constitution of India is the foundation of our beloved Nation, it gives rights, dignity, Liberty freedom and privileges to every Indian irrespective of religion, race , language, colour, some vested interests whoever want to tamper, modify , dissect with it must be sent to either Pakistan, Afghanistan or Somalia for life. ,

[@ForeverTensed]

If they ever make a biopic on Justice Nariman, I'm sure it'll be Boman Irani playing J. Nariman.

[@AmirMolla-u2w]

Preparing for Adj exam from kolkata. I regularly take lessons from this Legend.

[@Dei_Kei]

Great Lecture ! We cannot help but marvel at the due diligence, foresight & vision that the framers of our Constituition imparted to it thru extensive analyses & study ! Perhaps, we can think of the basic structure of the Constituition as the soul & spirit of the Constituition - the basic tenets, founding principles, intentions, motivations circumscribed in the overall situation [geo-political, socio-cultural, demographie etc.etc.] contemporaneous to the times it was framed - with an eye to the future ! The fact that substance supercedes just form ! The capacity to change gives it the required flexibility & resilience to adapt to the future ! That the route to change it is not easy - ensures that it cannot be altered to suit the whims, fancies, idiosyncracies, personal preferences & interests of future governments, unless support of a large polity is garnered thru ratification by the states ! Government - For the People, Of the People, By the People !

[@anmolsharma9220]

profound and worth hearing many times

[@Abhishek.2635]

God Osho of legal fraternity Justice Nariman at his best. 🙏🏻

[@mallikarjunangadi4246]

So beautifully explained !

[@IndranilBiswas_]

Justice Nariman and TN Seshan are exemplary public servants. We need such people more than ever, in this modi raj.

[@sasikumarn5786]

A heroic effort to glorify the indefensible! 👍 for that Mr. Rohinton.

[@sanjaypriyadarshi]

Superb knowledge session ..❤❤❤❤❤

[@kalamindia459]

Thanks to the most respectable sir...

[@AshwinMaloo79]

Dhanyavad Sir Ji ❤❤🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏❤❤❤❤❤

[@pradeepchakraverti]

While this Talk by Justice Nariman may be very educative to Scholars of Law; it is extremely enlightening to thinking ordinary Citizens. This becomes important, living as we are in an 'Age of Experimentation' which may lead to varied results.

[@vishnugautam4882]

भारतीय न्यायलयमा लाग्ने सम्पूर्ण खर्च भारतीय ले व्यहोर्नुपर्छ, न्यायलय को निर्णय भारतीय भाषा ननिक्लदा न्यायलय लेनै अन्याय गरेको महसुस भइरहेको छ।

[@alokshukla6399]

Excellent and mesmerizing

[@waltervetri2476]

If I am not mistaken the Doctrine was set by the Kerala Supreme Court in the Kesavanda case. It had become a stare decisis in most countries. Vetri South Africa 🙏🇿🇦🙏

[@shivaji.26]

It was set by Supreme Court of India... kerala is a state and states have high court

[@jvgeorge1474]

It originated as a civil WP against Kerala Government s orders in land acquisition case of a Hindu monastery in Kasargod, in the name of its head Kesavananda Bharati in 1970. Kerala Government was a Party to it.

[@waltervetri2476]

@@jvgeorge1474 You are quite Correct Sir. I do have that petitioner's case. Thank you. 🙏🇿🇦🙏I love the PIL system.

[@normanconceicao2282]

Wish our imminent leaders will adhere to our constitution instead o mulling of changing it Dr Ambekar was a brilliant man.we have fools wanting to amending it.

[@devidast1123]

Every Constitution has a basic structure.

[@devidast1123]

The court has said the basic structure is un-amendable yet, I am unable to discover any decision which uses the basic structure to strike down any state action or any contract for illegality.

[@JUST.ICE24]

Waah judge saab maza aa gaya👏👏

[@NidhiSingh-el4jn]

What were the two reasons gor which the Constitution should remain flexible?

[@pbghosh5305]

How we miss YOUR HONOUR in the SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. 🎉🎉🎉🙏🙏🙏

[@prashantkumarsikandar5176]

Bumped upon this video.. Which I think was of no importance to my priorities but still your eloquence kept me glued till the last..

[@chandankumar-lv7jc]

He is an epitome of knowledge 🙌💀

[@keyachatterjee5625]

sir you are a true polymath

[@prakasarao8901]

Wonderful and nice to listen

[@iiigraghu]

Great Presentation 💐🙏

[@bakuleshdalal1280]

I am a layman and am a common citizen. Your lecture was very lucid and simple to understand also provoke new thoughts. I beg your pardon but wish to say to us what matters is the basic preamble. It is our Gita. All the technical discussion harps on the letter and words in various acts. However I feel any Law should address The Pteamble and serve us. What is directed should enhance our faith in enlighten society. Argument should prelude this aspect and serve the ultimate goal of basic structure. Building constructed on basic foundation will collapse if faulty.

[@HafsaMohammed-fq8jw]

fortunately this speech is much informative

[@TV9media3030]

Wonderful and it enlightened me.

[@vicky7100]

Man should be in politics …………Orator par excellence ………Modi govt like Jai Shankar and Hardeep puri should appoint justice Nariman as a law minister

[@laxmimalewar8944]

During Modi regime, the importance of specific insertion of words "socialist" and "secular" has gained importance, which, in my opinion, Justice Nariman did not felt during Congress's regime. This was the success of Congress and Failure of Modi's Government. The capitalist government is providing ration to 80 crores of Indian population instead of lifting them out of poverty.

[@loganathansuppiah8736]

Thank God we are gifted with a human heart Judge perhaps As Lord DENNING

[@kjkamath5649]

TRNSPARENT COMMITMENT TO UPHOLD THE RULE OF LAW WITH THE LISTENERS IS THE HALLMARK OF JUSTICE NARIMAN SIR

[@lakshminarayananb5655]

I am proud to say that Judiciary system from British dynasty to Indian republic constitutional law brought so many lawers & judges both are equality in maintain the real judgement to public concerned only on merit. Later people enter the bar Association by fluke & cruke method. Doing nothing but voting to select their chairman who no wonder abide by the judgement without any solid argument.

[@archnamehta5109]

Just I read legal affairs nd found ur channel

[@kashmiri318]

Plz talk about abrogation Article 370 , is it not the violation of basic structure, apart from being abrogated without following the due process of law/procedure.

[@bibhupattanayak368]

Great flow of knowledge sir…

[@kashmiri318]

Thank you very much sir,

[@saratchandraprayaga6930]

Diversity in our dharmic civilisation is reflected in our constitution. Contitution layers must be special breed super beings how they can remember and argue so much of diversity in law😮

[@umeshprasadsingh9648]

UNIQUE ORATION.JAI HIND

[@neerajpandey2349]

sir what is the legal consequence when the slp is dismissed with comment all points open in any other proceeding

[@udaikhanna5380]

Great speech!

[@rajivmagavi5582]

Judge Nariman, your point well taken if you are able to answer these questions: 1. In a singular view of Upholding the Constitution alone can your put the country at risk of Greater Problems like disinformation by state enemies, disintegration of the country, deliberate demographic change for vested reasons and holding back very necessary measures that are needed to safe guard the country. First address the correspondence of pending cases, that way people who are aggrieved will get rightful justice and then things will fall in place, more or less. Why do we have so much nepotism in the highest level of Indian Judiciary? Do you agree faster disposal of cases (having economical implications) will help economic growth of the nation?

[@harirajmr]

I guess rather than Basic Structure being grounded in the Constitution, we must find the Constitution as Grounded on the Basic Structure. Even if there is no preamble, no specific provisions in 368, all the principles like Democracy, Federalism, Rule of Law etc. would still ought to be read as Basic Structure. Amazing exposition. Cannot thank the great legal mind enough.

[@bibhutikrishna4534]

Sir I had the chance to meet you in a Senior Adv. chamber, where I was an intern. I wanted to ask you this, how can I enhance my legal knowledge and be this enigmatic. As a beginner in this great field, what should be my modus operandi in order to become a great student of law for life.

[@kumarajitsingh6077]

The more & more, I read about the basic structure doctrine propounded by the Supreme Court of India in Keshvanand Bharati & subsequent judgments. I find myself agreeable to the principles of basic structure only to the extent of what Justice Khanna held in ADM Jabalbar Case. Rest is the device enunciated to usurp the power of Parliament i .e. the will of people, which is supreme in Democracy. Lastly, I would like to quote Abraham Lincoln's views on Democracy i .e. " Democracy is a government of the people, by the people and for the people"

[@nooriamina7043]

Sir what is the meaning of Ratification in a simple language

[@Mirage1deluded]

Well articulation

[@gunduraonarasimhamurthy7174]

Judicial Reform is a must.

[@manoharnaidu3075]

Good speaker 🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹

[@tonyclint4585]

Why there is cut on 7 minute ?

[@kannanindia6197]

I don't have Lawbackround but I admired lot the lecture... Whic is excellent really erudite one.

[@simadas6084]

Respected my Lord, please explain in criminal law also, it will help me

[@krishnamohandravida4791]

Sir, Review petition has become part of the constitution but rejected. Means?

[@sanjibchakraborty3904]

Every thing in the world may be explain in favour or against,so sciciarity is the only way to solve any problem.

[@pandurangbelhe7132]

Very.nice lecturer

[@Gopal1939]

If the Constituti9n is a Superstructure, there must be a basic structure which should necedsarilly be at the foundation snd the vertical pillars snd horizontal columns. You tinker with any or all of them, the superstructure will crumple. So, the basic structure is scattered throughout the Constitution. As Justice Nariman concluded, we should look for the basic structures not as blind men but with eyes and mind wide open. We will find them.

[@viceprincipalcmepune7892]

Excellent and true Legend

[@mohdabas384]

Excellent sir

[@devidas4006]

The doctrine of basic structure came from the SC but WITHOUT indicating the what and why or how of it.

[@rahultelange6748]

UPSC aspirant

[@AklavyaAnand]

great scholar...

[@nationfirst6817]

सुप्रीम कोर्ट सामान्य आदमी के पहुंच से बाहर है, कानून सरल, स्थानीय भाषा में हो, कोलेजियम खत्म हो।भाई भतीजावाद खत्म हो।

[@AbinashBora329]

He looks exactly like our honourable legend of india Dr. BR AMBEDKAR

[@gaur007]

Jai hind bharat mata ki jai ho

[@indiaconstitutionreview6887]

1)What is essential basic structure of constitution ? 2) What is essential basic structure of British colonialism? 3) What is structure used in keshvanand Bharti case for verdict.? Whether structures of colonialism or Constitution of India. 4) What is different between basic structures of constitution of India in 1950 and essential basic structures of British colonialism. 5), what is essential basic structures of constitution? 6), what is essential basic structures of British colonial legislation.

[@yushpi]

What our esteemed Lordships never mention in their lectures is that India is ruled by exceptions created in laws rather than core laws. India's Constitution as it stands is the most unprincipled one from anywhere in the world.

[@yushpi]

One example being this Parsi priest's father Fali Nariman objected to Yogi Adityanath being elevated to Chief Ministership of UP on account of him being a Mahant while him being a Priest didn't come in conflict with the secular constitutional roles he held Lol

[@vprakash2433]

Supreme Court striking down the NJAC which was basically a procedure for appointment of judges in higher courts, on the basic structure doctrine was wrong. A procedure cannot be part of basic structure. Independence of judiciary is not ensured only by appointment of judges by 5 senior judges in an opaque manner.