These engines don't go fast, but they go very, very far
@masgillan3 жыл бұрын
Agree, but why there is no flat head engine with forced induction? As we know the problem of flat head is small air suction at high rpm. But why?
@GhostOfDamned3 жыл бұрын
Durability 100
@Andrew-hh3ol3 жыл бұрын
Surprisingly if you put some of these engines into something that isn’t a steel body they’ll make you do wheelies and with a super charger you could easily see atleast the gmc 702 smacking a lot of modern cars lasting forever just like how semis without a trailer smack even turbo cars
@GlamStacheessnostalgialounge3 жыл бұрын
@@masgillan Well I think the Cord from the 30s had a model with a supercharger. I don't remember if it's a flathead though.
@bakedsynth34473 жыл бұрын
Yes but also no old engines dont really go further most cars before 60s was only expected to go 100k km
@mattt1986543213 жыл бұрын
A BUS with 73 HP and 126 Lb-ft torque? Yikes! I bet the riders were often late when there was a gentle headwind.
@loddude57063 жыл бұрын
Most of our rural school buses were Bedfords just like that, what they lacked in power they certainly made up for in transmission whine - & endless window rattle if the little bits of folded card fell out : )
@masterofThardus3 жыл бұрын
To be fair, that bus was probably a lot lighter than modern buses due to poor insulation, lighter structure due to a lack of safety regulations to meet, and fewer components in the engine, exhaust, and driveline.
@johnsheetz66393 жыл бұрын
Its got the charm.
@joe125ful3 жыл бұрын
Chill ride bus:)
@supertrinigamer3 жыл бұрын
73 horsepower back then for pre war is actually pretty insane.
@waitotong95903 жыл бұрын
Imagine putting the 702 V12 into a land yacht and add an overdrive gear to the gearbox. The ultimate old school highway cruiser
@captaindreadnought2123 жыл бұрын
one of the war boy vehicles in mad max fury road has that engine
@Foxxnioxx3 жыл бұрын
Yeeeeeah buddy!
@cThickens3 жыл бұрын
I’m putting a ram v10 into an old Cadillac with this idea in mind
@mvnorsel63543 жыл бұрын
I love tall gearing. I get pleasure cruising along on low rpm.
@matty2helpfull3 жыл бұрын
There's a guy on KZbin whose currently building a rat rod around that gmc v12
@FullBoltOnRacing3 жыл бұрын
The true lowest revving engine is mine when I run out of gas 😓
@midnightangel41293 жыл бұрын
No bro. I go to the negatives.😳
@FullBoltOnRacing3 жыл бұрын
@@midnightangel4129 you make the car give you RPMs back to run. I like your style
@midnightangel41293 жыл бұрын
@@FullBoltOnRacing I just had to say it. I'm such a troll. It's awesome.
@integrationofmanandmachine47143 жыл бұрын
low rpm doesnt mean it consumes less
@christianmotley2623 жыл бұрын
With all those bean burritos?
@kevinvoyer50533 жыл бұрын
Back in my family’s history, my Dad ran a small Mom&Sons trucking company that was started by my Grandfather. By the late 70’s after I was Honorably Discharged from The U.S.Army, I went to work driving trucks. But the day I turned 16, Dad had me working in the garage, washing the refer trucks and learning to service them. That was a small 10 unit fleet, 2, 65/66 R Model Mack’s, with 26’ refer bodies and 150hp Scania straight six diesels with twin sticks. Plus 8, GMC Straight refer body trucks, from a fleet of 10, 6500-9500 series 6 wheelers, all with the big block V6 cyl GMC gas powered engines, from 2, 305 ci to 6, 345 ci to 2, 401 ci. That all had 5 speed low hole gearbox’s, the two bigger 9500’s, had the 401, with a two speed rear axle. All ran down the road at 68-72 mph, at 3,200-3,400 governed rpm’s. That all ran great for just about 160,000 hard heavy miles, then was rebuilt in house by Dads mechanic, named Mort, who taught me everything I know about wrenching. These engines would then go on to last another 120,000 miles each after his rebuilds. All while burning no oil, but LOTS of gas! Like 3 to 6 mpg, between the truck and refer units drawing gas from at least two 40 gal tanks, for local delivery work. I also remember after The company grew up to need tractor trailers, they had bought out a local company that went under. We got 4 old gas White Mustangs for yard horse work and delivery to a local market chain wear house. One I bought with my cousin to fix up for truck shows was an old 1964 GMC tandem axle tractor that had one of those 701 V12’s, hooked to a 6 speed low hole, with posi rears, that was as used to pull dump trailers in a pit and local work! Top speed was only 57 mph, but man could it pull! Pull a 48,000 lbs load of canned goods as well as a 200 Cummins with a 10 speed Roadranger! Just not as fast top speed! But leave it going through the gears! Great yard plow rig also with a 10,000 lbs concrete block on the fifth wheel, an a huge 10’ angle plow!
@savage22bolt323 жыл бұрын
That's a really cool story. Thanks for sharing!
@mikethemechanic73953 жыл бұрын
Nice
@szymon62073 жыл бұрын
Ursus c330 limit 2200rpm
@Choochinc3 жыл бұрын
It upsets me a bit that the Hudson Hornet engine from the 50s makes the same amount of power as my Ford 300 from 1990. Both 5L, both straight 6, but the Hudson is a 6.7:1 compression flathead and the Ford is an 8:1 compression overhead valve with fuel injection.
@VisioRacer3 жыл бұрын
The Hudson Hornet is truly awesome. It does sound incredible, too!
@aeroflopper3 жыл бұрын
i bet the mpg has not changed much either.
@aeroflopper3 жыл бұрын
@Mitch09 How did they do that was bhp different then, emissions( governments)screwed with power, if i were king we would all be in 1000bhp V10s..
@C4Cole053 жыл бұрын
@@aeroflopper They recorded power with just the raw engine, no accessories that would normally be on the engine. Now we record BHP with all the stuff on so it is more representative of a engine actually in a car.
@jareknowak87123 жыл бұрын
@@aeroflopper *SAE norm
@danburch99893 жыл бұрын
Low reving engines generally have bores that are smaller in diameter than the stroke. They are a class of engine called "Under square". Under square engines develop a lot of torque because of the long throw of the crankshaft (it's a lever). A "Square" engine has the bore and stroke nearly the same. An "Over square" engine has a larger bore over the stroke. Over square engines are designed for high reving applications like racing motor cycles. They deveop torque at the wheels by gearing down through the transmission and differential.
@fidelcatsro69483 жыл бұрын
great explanation!!
@martyjohnsonozarkoutdoors81983 жыл бұрын
One of the highest torque engines of the muscle car era was a 455 Buick. With a 4.3125" bore and a 3.9" stroke
@puffkendrick68503 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the technical explanation,this is good to know.
@jhh6313 жыл бұрын
length of the cylinder stroke mostly affects how fast it can rev. There are some tiny motorbike engines that have very small strokes and an under square cylinder design that can rev over 10k rpm. A car engine with a slight undersquare bore to stroke ratio can rev around 6000-7000 rpm A marine engine with a bore to stroke ratio of around 0.45 will rev around 100rpm. A car engine with the same bore to stroke ratio would rev around 3000 rpm. Few things to know: the length of the stroke mostly affects how much TORQUE an engine produces, the bore affects how much peak air can get into the cylinder which is the reason why oversquare engines produce more peak hp, but undersquare cylinders generally produce more low end horsepower than oversquare cylinders which is the reason why that underpowered bus (in today’s standards) is somewhat driveable.
@szymon62073 жыл бұрын
Wirlwind tanks !
@CarputingYT3 жыл бұрын
You've been pumping out some good content, VisioRacer! Love seeing these random lists. Keep it up, you have a great format. Have an awesome Monday! : )
@Ferruccio0013 жыл бұрын
Fully agreed, this dude is either a freakin wizard, or puts a great amount of time and efforts into his content. Either way, really exclusive material! Heats off.
@VisioRacer3 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much, guys, it means a lot to me!
@finlaymcdiarmid58323 жыл бұрын
Curiosity makes the world go round
@robertwoodliff25363 жыл бұрын
@@VisioRacer..... Great work, keep it up.!
@peterryan53093 жыл бұрын
I never get tired of seeing a GMC 702. What a unique piece of engineering!
@wymple093 жыл бұрын
I had a Buick straight 8 from 1953. The smoothness & intake drone are something that lives with you forever. I got it to 108 MPH on the speedo, which was amazing for a 1953 automobile.
@flyingdutchman47943 жыл бұрын
Thanks for these videos - they are informative without silly graphics and voiceovers. The "100% content" format is much appreciated. I don't know how popular it might be - but - it would be interesting to see a video on old farm tractor engines starting back at the beginning of the last century. Some of them were over 20L with one or two cylinders...!
@ProudDad19763 жыл бұрын
It is sometimes hard to explain the difference between horsepower and torque but this video gives a great example of how the two are needed.
@pleasedontwatchthese95933 жыл бұрын
Horsepower = Torque × speed / 5252 . You make HP by having a lot of torque or a lot of speed (rpm) or some combination of both. If you can have a large displacement engine you often have more torque because its easier to make reliable (like a tracker or a truck). But if your limited on displacement or want to save weight you have lower torque but make up for it by revving higher.
@Sackmatters3 жыл бұрын
That Ford N series is absolutely gorgeous. The engine and the tractor.
@The_sinner_Jim_Whitney3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, we had an old 8N on our family farm from the ‘50s before my dad and uncles/aunts were born all the way til like 10 years ago. At some point, someone put a flathead V8 in it, which was rebuilt a couple times, and of course various hydraulics and such had been modified and repaired over the years, but it still ran great when we sold it and was always my favorite for moving round bales and bush-hogging. Great tractor, very maneuverable and light enough not to tear the ground up too badly, plenty of power, looked and sounded wonderful. It started to have some transmission problems and it was sold to a guy that wanted to do a show restoration on it.
@Sackmatters3 жыл бұрын
@@The_sinner_Jim_Whitney That is amazing. I’d love to have an 8N as a shoe piece and to restore. I have a LS225he and absolutely love it for my needs. Digging with the backhoe moving large trees and box blading my property as I develop it more. I just hit 170 hrs on the meter this last weekend moving 2-1/2 feet of snow.
@The_sinner_Jim_Whitney3 жыл бұрын
@@Sackmatters If I knew more about tractors or had the proper place to fix it up, I would’ve taken it and done so. As it stands, I don’t have the room or knowledge, so it went to a better home than I could’ve given it. Fantastic tractor, though. Now we have a 65-hp 4WD John Deere (dunno the model number, it’s about five years old) with heat, AC, and a cab and a hoe and loader bucket for it and an ‘80 or so Deutz 4WD diesel that’s probably around 40-45 hp if I were to guess, along with a midsize Bobcat. They get anything done we need them to. We also still have a HUGE 1937 Case that will start, run, and drive but never gets used. It was historically the haywagon tractor for our square bales of horse hay, but it’s been retired for a long while, probably 20 years. It’ll probably go soon, but it was my late grandfather’s first big purchase (even before the farm, at that time he was leasing land for corn, tobacco, and Hereford cattle) and I hope one of us will restore it one day.
@Sackmatters3 жыл бұрын
@@The_sinner_Jim_Whitney That is so neat. I wish I could buy a tractor with a heated cab for my snow removal and winter projects. That’d be a dream come true. What size bucket do you use on the Deere? The backhoe that is. I love using bobcats and skid steers in general they can move so much for their compact size.
@The_sinner_Jim_Whitney3 жыл бұрын
@@Sackmatters My uncle is the one who does most of the daily stuff and owns the equipment, so I don’t know exactly. I know he has an 8” and a 24” bucket, I assume the volume of them is sized to the tractor. Same with the loader, appears to be of roughly the same size as all the small-ish backhoe loader buckets I deal with on jobsites (I’m an IBEW electrician), but I couldn’t say what size it actually is beyond probably the factory-recommended size for a 65-horse diesel John Deere. Yeah, the Bobcat is awesome. It makes scraping driveways, filling holes and trenches, even moving bales or logs take like half the time it normally would.
@E_tiBEAMERBOY3 жыл бұрын
Your English is getting better keep it up great vids!
@VisioRacer3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@E_tiBEAMERBOY3 жыл бұрын
@@VisioRacer of course!
@11D7-n8d3 жыл бұрын
I want to yell too!
@szymon62073 жыл бұрын
@@11D7-n8d hurlimann d series . Okay
@Tom-Lahaye3 жыл бұрын
Another fine episode on engines of which you can count powerstrokes and see the valve rockers operating. That Continental Sherman tank engine sounds so good.
@welshwarrior71973 жыл бұрын
Yeeeeeeees the Hudson has been featured!! Thank you for this!
@jamesgeorge65513 жыл бұрын
Odd cylinders always sound so good, raggedy starting radials, the best. Also, those old kerosene burning tractors pulling a heavy sled is amazing too. In the states the Rumley Oil Pull was a similar tractor, only a two cylinder. Great vid man, you have covered so much internal combustion ground, keep up the good work.
@carllinden5333 жыл бұрын
7:25 Oh my! I think we have one of these sitting up on the hill here at our old farm! My Grandpa tells me that he remembers when he was a kid the reverse gear was too fast which made it hard to drive and park
@ancobastiaan96993 жыл бұрын
we have one at home, which my dad and my grandfather restored together the last few years and it kinda is. When you want to attach something behind it, you have to release the clutch just a little bit, otherwise it's going too fast backwards
@danw19553 жыл бұрын
I put many hours of riding time on one of those 8N Ford tractors.😉 Everything from mowing to plowing snow, they did it all! Maybe not as fast as some more modern tractors, but they were easy to work on when necessary, and they were extremely reliable!😁
@The_sinner_Jim_Whitney3 жыл бұрын
I guess the lowest-revving engines ever would’ve been the big two-stroke singles like in the Lanz Bulldog tractor and some other applications, they could like oscillate and run at literally 0 rpm.
@VisioRacer3 жыл бұрын
Pretty much yeah, since they can run either way
@Тертий_В3 жыл бұрын
A bulldog isn’t a gasoline engine though
@flashgordon37153 жыл бұрын
2 stroke pile driver is no more that about 60 cycles per minute. I say cycles because there is no crank shaft but it is powered by diesel detonation. Er well that's not gas I guesd
@BattlecatRed3 жыл бұрын
That two-stroke "hot bulb" engine is fascinating - have you seen the video with the guy idling that tractor (at 0 rpm) in gear? The tractor constantly hops back and forth with each piston stroke! See 02:34 here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/porIdqKqhcSWaa8
@The_sinner_Jim_Whitney3 жыл бұрын
@@BattlecatRed I have, several of them. I guess that’s a design ‘feature’ and it doesn’t hurt them a bit to do that.
@justin-mg8bi Жыл бұрын
One of my favorite car documentaries to watch on KZbin thank you I love your content 👍
@descargaelbano3 жыл бұрын
Don't forget about the Lanz Bulldog engine with a Max RPM of 1000. At idle the engines would be running at 0 RPM. The internals would just be oscillating back and forth but not rotating the crankshaft a complete revolution. The hot bulb engine could use any fuel that was burnable including gas. I'd love to see one of these motors in action.
@tonylavinder14033 жыл бұрын
You do a good show. I'm stuck on older farm engines building them the way you would build a high proformance car engine. I like to see what you can get out of it.
@szymon62073 жыл бұрын
So rpm installed gauge x-too by ligier ?
@dp.oennismaurer2053 жыл бұрын
That GMC twin six V-12 was used in the city c.o.e. made into fire engines. Some were tractor trailer ladder trucks, or pumper units.
@onutaoyusao3 жыл бұрын
Got a sudden desire to play Mudrunner after hearing that Zil, those logs wont deliver themselves!
@DrunkenVtec3 жыл бұрын
Gotta try out snowrunner!
@Ham.rigs073 жыл бұрын
Snowrunner is such good game.
@SledTillDead3 жыл бұрын
@@DrunkenVtec Mudrunner is better. Snowrunner doesn't even have these trucks.
@typhoon-73 жыл бұрын
Always amuses me to see these old engines. How they manage to use so much steel to turn so much fuel into such little power. The progress made is fantastic.
@SirCavemaninthewest3 жыл бұрын
The Valeo starter in my Saturn has more torque than the engine.
@szymon62073 жыл бұрын
2100rpm ttv warrior !
@shanehnorman3 жыл бұрын
Another well-researched and engaging collection, VisioRacer - thank you.
@VisioRacer3 жыл бұрын
Glad you like it, thanks!
@ruudiutsenikov6093 жыл бұрын
9:33 there are 2 perfect 90 degree angles on his forehead, literally
@kleetus923 жыл бұрын
I was like what are you talking abou.... Oh...
@adamsabbagh94333 жыл бұрын
“Perfect”
@ruudiutsenikov6093 жыл бұрын
@@adamsabbagh9433 ?
@gatttagofast52783 жыл бұрын
Haha wtf
@adamsabbagh94333 жыл бұрын
@@ruudiutsenikov609 almost perfect, was just a joke
@Flies2FLL3 жыл бұрын
There is an old fire truck in Oakland Park, Florida that has that 702 V12. GM built a prototype of this engine with 956 cubic inches, but never put it into production. Great video!
@niia.36423 жыл бұрын
I'm guessing that 956 prototype would have been related to the 478 V6?
@Flies2FLL3 жыл бұрын
@@niia.3642 Yes.
@rhiantaylor34463 жыл бұрын
In the words of Carroll Shelby “Horsepower sells cars, torque wins races.” That's why I like diesels, though modern turbo diesels give you torque and power.
@billyray47163 жыл бұрын
@sw4gr1d thank you, nobody understands that diesel engines feel like theyre faster because they make 90% of their hp at 1500 rpm lol
@theknifedude18813 жыл бұрын
I’m an old guy and Visio Racer is the first KZbin channel I subscribed to. He’d been making them for a while because the first one I watched had a voice over. Anyway, keep the great videos coming!
@VisioRacer3 жыл бұрын
Thank you, sir! I appreciate it very much
@DrFruikenstein3 жыл бұрын
The 702 V12 (often called me split 6) is interesting. I occasionally rode in a school bus that had one. The church that had it ended up junking it because it needed a tune up, and they tried giving it the tune up, but couldn't figure out how it worked. It never ran again. At the time, had I known that a split 6 wasn't a 6 cylinder, I would have went to the junkyard to get it. When I was growing up, I had seen some of them in GMC semi-tractors. I have also seen Cadillac 472 engines put in semi-tractors. You should do another video on low revving gas engines. There's the W.O. Bentley 8L. 6 cylinder. The Hall Scott 6 cylinder. And I know there's a few more that aren't coming to mind right now. Have fun.
@peanut719683 жыл бұрын
My grandfather bought a Ford 8N in 1939. It was used on the farm to this day. My cousin owns it now and it hauls feed to hoppers in the feed lot. Starts even when it is -40f.
@FlintWestwood13 жыл бұрын
A very popular low revving gasoline engine that I think is a notable mentions is the 4 cylinder air cooled boxer engine used in the VW bug and early porsche. If I remember right it redlines around 3500/4000 rpm
@plhebel1Ай бұрын
International Harvester built an engines for their trucks like the R190 which was a very popular seller in the 1960's and the engine type have been around is the RD 450. The engine made 202 hp @3000 rpm and 422 ft/lbs of torque at 1600 rpm's if you can believe that. Thanks for making this video.
@DVRolly3 жыл бұрын
ZiL-130 - V8 6.0 Truck ZiL-131 fitted with engine ZiL-131 (V8 6.0), and truck Ural-375 (and buses LiAZ-677, LAZ-699R) fitted with engine ZiL-375 (V8 7.0)
@danw19553 жыл бұрын
Continental had some big slow-turning engines also. I once drove a 20 ton crane on a military IHC chassis (M-62) with a Continental R-6602 in-line six that had fuel mileage that could be measured in gallons per MILE! They only had about 190 hp. from 602 cu.in. of displacement, but the torque was probably in excess of 900 ft. lbs. They generally had 2 monster 2 bbl. carbs, and redline was around 1900 rpm.😉
@walmartdog11423 жыл бұрын
I operated one of those Ford N series tractors for my dad in the '50s and '60s. They are highly prized to this day, and thousands are still in daily use.
@grikorskakupizguks3 жыл бұрын
In my town the local diminutive uses the ZIL as a milk transporter and every time it pases by you can smell the gas from it
@Dug66666663 жыл бұрын
You could have easily started with race cars from the early 1900's like "The beast of Turin" with its 28 lt engine with a red line of 1900 rpm
@hernandovillamarinbuenaven74763 жыл бұрын
Your great vids are getting better every time. Many thanks & Blessings for your awsome work!!.. 🤗🙏🙏🙏
@Mercmad3 жыл бұрын
When i was in School in the 1960's our school busses were all O series Bedford's. The whining gearbox bought back a lot of memories ,especially cold mornings riding in an unheated slow bus.
@szymon62073 жыл бұрын
one more thing GULDNER G 75 SET 2150RPM
@FLUFFSQUEAKER3 жыл бұрын
I love seeing those old engines.
@flashgordon37153 жыл бұрын
My Ford 300cubic inch straight 6 was said to have peak torque of 295ftlbs at 1800 rpm. Never went much past 3000rpm
@johnspecht723 жыл бұрын
I like your content but your narration is why I subscribed. Good to see you are comfortable being in front of the camera.
@VisioRacer3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@shafferjoe19623 жыл бұрын
I don't know where you come up with all these cool engine. But keep up the good work. This was interesting because it was low rpm and OMG where they low...
@Mikey-lj4ch3 жыл бұрын
I've always wanted to build one of those gmc 702s
@gen3v83 жыл бұрын
Good onya Visio. I haven`t missed a video in years
@2smokeHennerz3 жыл бұрын
Nice vid bro interesting these engines also your English is getting better and more clearer I’m proud of you great vid
@fuhkoffandie3 жыл бұрын
Yes finally, I get to see that GM V12 with the heads off. Thank you VisioRacer.😁👍💯💯💯🔧
@member573 жыл бұрын
A shocking number of Ford n-series are still running and doing work to this day. My 8n is one of them.
@member573 жыл бұрын
@@mikemerrill175 If you have an overrun clutch and proper shear pins on the shaft you should be ok.
@BattlecatRed3 жыл бұрын
As usual, excellent video. We share the same fascinations with engines and vehicles...
@davidpeters65363 жыл бұрын
A Traction Engine with a petrol engine, amazing! Thanks for another great video.
@AgentPepsi13 жыл бұрын
On my father-in-law's ranch here in Texas, there is an old ranch truck (1976 or 77 Dodge) with a 225 cid slant-6 motor. That one is missing from your video, as those engines were in everything it seems.
@-ROB-E-3 жыл бұрын
Take a look at marine application engines. These are low rev-ing. And some pretty old interesting stuff. Like the old Dutch brand Werkspoor. Greetings
@MrMusic19503 жыл бұрын
Another super show. I must be an engineophile. I love them. Anything on old (or new) chinese engines? Designed so carefully now that the whole world is using some of their features.
@saviohudson3 жыл бұрын
You forgot about the 'beast of turin'. Fiat S76
@nick_dizzle3 жыл бұрын
I don't know where you get your ideas for vids but keep them coming!
@VisioRacer3 жыл бұрын
It comes naturally, hehe. Thanks
@ReidHenderson3 жыл бұрын
Me and my grandfather had a Ford 8N tractor with the flathead 4 cyl. It was very low revving with a long stroke. You could get it loaded really hard at full throttle and it would sound like it was only turning about 200 to 400 rpm at full throttle.
@willgeary60863 жыл бұрын
The Hudson 308 could could also produce 160 hp with just the Twin-H set up alone as well. It runs pretty good on modern gas too with the Chromium and nickel alloy block, no premium or lead needed.
@paulsto65163 жыл бұрын
Your vids are usually surprising, and always fascinating!! Thanks for posting.
@the2belo3 жыл бұрын
Man, these _Spintires_ graphics are getting *awesome*
@sloppysamari3 жыл бұрын
After 4+ years of watching you, I feel like I have a friend over seas that teaches me about engines lol
@VisioRacer3 жыл бұрын
Hehe, pleased to hear this
@sumaterabus3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, the 702 GMC was disassembled and rebuilt just one day by my father during training. Gasoline was cheaper than diesel back then.
@kevinstonerock31583 жыл бұрын
Possibly one of the longest production engines is the John Deere horizontal two cylinder engines that had a governed 975 load speed and a 1075 rpm fast idle which would idle down to under 200 for maneuvering. With the proper carburetor it would run nearly any fuel produced.
@drtidrow3 жыл бұрын
That Aultman & Taylor engine looks like it was fitted in what was originally a steam tractor design - the "radiator" is just the front section of the fire-tube boiler, with fans pulling air through the old fire tubes. 9:30 Love that little model OHC four-cylinder engine on the table behind you, have you done a video on it yet?
@jaekovkurosakai3 жыл бұрын
I like your style and choice of content, keep up the good work bro!
@mtcondie3 жыл бұрын
The Lycoming O-360 is about the most common general aviation engine in the most common aircraft in the world; The Cessa 172. The Lycoming 360 family of engines are gasoline powered, horizontally opposed four cylinders with a displacement of 5.9 liters, 180HP and have a maximum operational RPM of around 2700. The Lycoming 360 family of engines have been in general aviation use since the early 1950s.
@valiantxsquire3 жыл бұрын
Great video, thanks
@VisioRacer3 жыл бұрын
I thank you for stopping by and commenting!
@hans-peterklein53033 жыл бұрын
Great Video, as always! Maybe you can do one about opposed piston engines? They weres used in planes, stationary engines, trucks and tractors by brands like Junkers, CLM, MAP. But even today, there's a brand in the states which uses them. It's called Achates.
@danburch99893 жыл бұрын
3:08 The bore & stroke of that engine is 3-3/8" x 4" (85.725 x 101.6). Compression ratio 6.22:1. From a tech manual I found online.
@VisioRacer3 жыл бұрын
I could not find it anywhere. Thanks!
@NG-zg8vf3 жыл бұрын
That Bedford sounds like it's gonna blow up
@572Btriode3 жыл бұрын
But it's the same lump and gearbox that powered the WWII Bedford QL 3 ton trucks, all 52,247 of them, the back bone of British army transport during WWII in various body styles.
@allaboutbalochistan76593 жыл бұрын
Wao nice to see you man i was just listen your sound from long time
@zolfkimbly1033 жыл бұрын
About ZIL-130 and ZIL-131 engines, they was almost identical, 131 was just army variant, only diffs was armoured fuel and electrical wiring, oilpan was turned backwards to fit 4WD system.
@Ham.rigs073 жыл бұрын
Love those old Ford tractors!! Very cool and simple machines.
@bruhmoment32063 жыл бұрын
the hudson hornet sounds very similar to a 90s era ford falcon straight 6. they have a smaller displacement at 4.0L though. still a very cool engine none the less
@mattt1986543213 жыл бұрын
My man, I love your channel so much! Nice work.
@VisioRacer3 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@VintageGarageYT3 жыл бұрын
A video dedicated to the Honda RC series would be interesting! They have all kinds of crazy engine layouts and setups.
@VisioRacer3 жыл бұрын
That is a great idea, thanks!
@VintageGarageYT3 жыл бұрын
@@VisioRacer No no, thank you for all the cool videos 😁.
@alifkm23 жыл бұрын
‘This engine requires 454 liters of coolant’ wtf 😂😂😂
@zachsteiner3 жыл бұрын
Oh cool another one of these episodes. You should do Some kind of video talking about maybe V-8’s with the most torque or something.
@danonoveh81143 жыл бұрын
i really love your video very interesting, and i learned alot thank you very much sir !👍😃
@1xARM3 жыл бұрын
Awesome video, can't wait for the next one mate.
@michaelbenardo56953 жыл бұрын
The 53 Hudson Hornet with Twin H power, (twin carbs), made 160 Horsepower and 275 LBS FT of torque, and the 54 - 55 made 170 horses, the 56 made 175.
@randymack17823 жыл бұрын
saw a project truck for sale recently, February? it had the GMC V12 in it, it wasn't in title, but in description & pics showed it, I was trying to find a cheap dump truck, & that was more than I could afford. around $7,500, I found a 1961 Dodge dump for $2K with old Polysphere 318
@juangonzalez-qg6eh3 жыл бұрын
Woooow! cool engines 😀 Thanks 😁
@apancher3 жыл бұрын
I love these videos! You always find the weird and wonderful.
@VisioRacer3 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@Ham.rigs073 жыл бұрын
Loves these videos man you do a great job!
@richardseelye99383 жыл бұрын
Very interesting, thanks again
@VisioRacer3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@572Btriode3 жыл бұрын
The Sherman at 7:15 is a M4A4 though and should have the Chrysler A57 Multibank, they are rare and maybe has been repowered with the common Wright R-975, sounds like a Multibank though. Easy ID for the M4A4, it had to be lengthened to get the A-57 in there and so has noticeably bigger gaps between the bogie assemblies and roadwheel pairs.
@michaels13063 жыл бұрын
Hudson hornet 308 flathead L6 lasted until 1956 (Hudson merged with Nash in late 1954 to create AMC, but kept the badge name until the end of 1957).
@michaelbenardo56953 жыл бұрын
And with twin carbs, (Twin H Power in Hudsonese), made 160 horsepower in 52 - 53, 170 in 54 - 55, and 175 in 56.
@theodorbean26043 жыл бұрын
fancy doing all production gasoline V12 engines? i am pretty interested in this
@fomaWeeD3 жыл бұрын
Plz bro make some quads videos, mayb 2t quads 1980-2006 love your work no stop!
@hollander1333 жыл бұрын
It is a really nice list there. Tough I hoped to see the Beast of Turin (Fiat S76) in the list. Whit it's 28.5-liter, 290-hp, inline-four cylinder engine, going around 3000 RPM.
@panji77933 жыл бұрын
That Bedford bus is amazing,all low rpm engines almost can run forever with very cheap gasoline
@zapa473 жыл бұрын
Love these videos 😁 Keep it up!
@men5crumm3 жыл бұрын
The engine of the british Mark IV tank of ww1 was petrol and made peak hp at 1000 rpm, doubt theres any sound footage of it though
@madrx23 жыл бұрын
3:33 Some say that school bus took a wrong turn 60 years ago and is still lost.
@Rinue6183 жыл бұрын
i love the hudson hornet sound
@FUBAR7623 жыл бұрын
Been watching you for a while. Love the content. Have my sub