Reminder that volumetric is the absolute worst. Also if you guys could subscribe that would be great, I have some stuff I want to announce but I want to wait until the 400k QnA video
@DeliveryDemon8 ай бұрын
What is the best way to play the M4(76) Jumbo?
@FatherGrigori8 ай бұрын
new merch possibly?
@yazovgang8 ай бұрын
Day 141 of asking spookston to play the 15cm sIG 33b sfl
@cscs41698 ай бұрын
Gotta love how they still haven't fixed volumetric and every time they "fix" the maps they somehow become even worse but don't worry, they'll be introducing a new 70 dollar premium for every tech tree in every update, that's the important stuff.
@swappy898 ай бұрын
Volumetric is the absolute worst, yeah it do IS 2 vs Panther D turret, non pen
@dmitryivanov54118 ай бұрын
Starts off playing the IS-2 with poor luck, eats fortune cookie, proceeds to not get CAS bombed and do quite well with the IS-2. Maybe Spookston needs a pick me up fortune cookie every time he encounters a tank that he might hate to use.
@Teh0X8 ай бұрын
Amazing how few times he was even targetted by CAS, considering he was fighting USA almost every round.
@thedissatisfactoryman1148 ай бұрын
The fortune cookie bypassed his curse! And Panda Express is a good Chinese place, glad to know your fam eats there
@chasetoyama81848 ай бұрын
Half-Chinese person here; it’s *technically* not Chinese food but goddamn it I’m gonna treat it like it is. It’s good fucking food.
@yourlocalasleeponioperativ40958 ай бұрын
If he folded a thousand paper cranes in a year, would he be able to escape cas for the year?
@lb01788 ай бұрын
Bro second guesses himself sooo much on ranges
@ikmalshahrin88548 ай бұрын
Fortune Cookie: You have every right to be confident Spookston: Uhm no I dont Also Spookston: Blindshot moving kill 5 seconds later
@benvanzon32348 ай бұрын
5:36 "that bush looks like a tank' *shows four pixels*
@goodnamepleaseplease8 ай бұрын
no it was like 3
@AHappyCub8 ай бұрын
Literally got a match where a rock looks like a Panther, schizo moment I swear
@xxxD3FC0N_1xxx8 ай бұрын
Four fucking pixels
@xuruiyu8 ай бұрын
@@xxxD3FC0N_1xxx Beat me to it xd
@goodnamepleaseplease8 ай бұрын
you guys are way too good i cant see a tank point blank
@dillonhunt17208 ай бұрын
>Kills half the enemy team >Wonders why players spawn back in and try to stop him
Add the following as optionals: [ ] Plays ground RB, looks inside, planes [X] Can I pls win [ ] (When playing any german Tank): Insulting Germany for making bad tanks [X] (When playing soviet Tanks): Complaing about gun depression [X] Complaing about full uptiers/getting one (and by one I mean like 70% of games)
@mrnaginata41588 ай бұрын
@@felraksis [ ] Complaining about german teammates
@komodoblood99178 ай бұрын
Not gonna lie, Spookston may be the reason I've been saying "Jeez Louise" a lot recently.
@robertocorrea42888 ай бұрын
[X] says a Word in spanish
@Supertortoes8 ай бұрын
[X] “get clowned on”
@mr.axolotl77278 ай бұрын
Ah, the IS-2. I got it to grind the Soviet tree, seeing what a menace it was in downtiers. However, here are some fun facts I learned about it. 1. 90% are full uptiers, so fighting vehicles from the 80s is not unusual. 2. It’s the same battle rating as such things like the Tiger 2 and the T34, that are better than it in every way. 3. A 122 to a tank’s barrel does indeed NOT break it. 4. Despite having a 19mm fuse, it will not fuse on many vehicles. 5. Despite having 200 mm of pen, it will not pen many vehicles. 6. An M26 driver can eat an entire 122 APHE and save the tank. 7. A duster driver can eat an entire 122 APHE and save the vehicle. 8. CAS magnet. 9. The IS 2 fuel is more explosive than nuclear bombs. 10. Using this tank has taught me to be a rat.
@andreypolyakov15938 ай бұрын
I would like to add that : 1. Milk trucks can and will survive a 122mm round directly into the chassis (Gaijin pls bring back hull break) 2. No matter the caliber, a Panther’s mantlet is the closest thing in the universe to an immovable object 3. The loader is the most vital member of the crew 4. They call it a heavy tank just because it’s slow 5. Good thing you don’t have to aim for weakspots, because they would have to really try in order to not hit yours
@mhplayer8 ай бұрын
I've found myself enjoying it as a backup to my 2S3M and 2S1 for engames. Most people got their big scary heavies out of the way and you don't see enough people in endgame for the reload to be much issue. It's also increadibly ratty as you can just annihilate anything that isn't a T32 (it can actually pen a T34's ufp and front turret weakspots, or a tiger 2H's slightly angled side armor as it's only 80mm). Your biggest enemies are: -vlad on his toyota pickup with bertha, his heavy machinegun -that one vk30.02M that for some reason has the same pen as you, enough he filler to oneshot you and a quarter of the reload. Same obviously applies to every. Fcking. Medium tank at that br bracket -bombs. -a slightly concave terrain
@vladingue85038 ай бұрын
@@mhplayerYou can pen T32 Ufp in the MG port but you need to aim to do that while T32... Well as it was said before, he really needs to try his best to not OS you cuz IS2 armor is a thing.
@sneakycactus88158 ай бұрын
@@mhplayerman that sounds like a great line up. after you get CAS MG'd to death in your 2s1 and 2s3, you can get bombed in your is2. war thunder gaming is so pog
@mhplayer8 ай бұрын
@@sneakycactus8815 that's why you have the praga... To also get strafed immediatly after getting out of spawn xd i also keep a T-34 for mobility and honestly it's quite fun to use so i bring it up to 6.3
@nul_point8 ай бұрын
12:10 "Spookston had, in fact, every reason to be confident. However, he was certainly not"
@_v7_2578 ай бұрын
You have every reason to be confident "No I don't!" Immediately lands an absolutely ridiculous hail Mary shot
@PraetorianMan8 ай бұрын
The IS-2’s going up has been a massive proxy buff to the KV-122 lol
@cheften2mk8 ай бұрын
That is still at 5.3 and its effectively the same as the 6.3 Is-2
@blackfox74488 ай бұрын
@@cheften2mk well, the early is-2 has a weaker front lower chasis, basicly almost anything can pen it frontally, the is-2 1944 has a stronger frontal lower chasis that legit only get to pen barely with a 88 or heat and/or apds shells xD
@FBI-bj9krАй бұрын
money money money
@richardzehe15528 ай бұрын
I do find the IS-2 and large-caliber cannons in general hilariously bad in War Thunder with Volumetric, the system definitely helps tanks behave a bit more properly with their armor but at the same time, the larger the gun the more wonky the whole system feels. Whilst I understand how we've arrived at this situation, I very much disagree with the 122 not penning OBVIOUSLY overmatched armor. For the statistics people in the chat an IS-2 with standard APHE is a 25kg(55lb) shell, leaving the barrel at 800m/s(2600 ft/s roughly 300ft/s slower than an M4 carbine 5.56x45mm rifle bullet) which at 1km distant generates roughly 1761 lbf on average on impact or UP TO 3522 lbf. (just for reference a Compact Smart Car weighs in at 1500 lbs, standard Chevy Impala is about 3600-3800 lbs) On top of that when range drops to 500m, roughly double the force amounts. I'm just gonna leave this here, at best you're being hit by a Compact Smart Car, at worst its a full-size family sedan worth of force smacking into your vehicle on a concentrated point (there are pictures of German tanks that were shot in WW2 by an IS-2 or 122mm cannon in general btw, feel free to google that and have a looksee) Hint: it didn't end well. Added: For anyone going to try and rip me a new one for *not accurate numbers* I literally just used a calculator on Bullet Impact I am by no means a specialist or something crunching numbers or reciting facts saying "I can't be wrong". I'm sure the numbers vary in a lot of cases, everything here is an approximation based on paper statistics, even so, that's an eyebrow raising amount of force transfer (Nor do I expect full realism in War Thunder or want it, I think a middle-ground compromise that still makes the game fun is the best option)
@5co7568 ай бұрын
Sure it has some power , but it can't be more energy than the IS2 itself has to withstand . The recoil has the same power as the shell , simple law of physics . Some things like muzzle brake lowers it , but a huge amount of energy stays .
@richardzehe15528 ай бұрын
@@5co756 I don't disagree, just wanted to point out, I believe the IS-2 has 2 short recoil stabilizers on top of the breech as well as the weight of the gun/breech itself and the side/rear diverting muzzle break. Unless the energy required to propel the shell is greater than the weight of the barrel/strength of the breech internals it shouldn't be a problem to be launching rounds down range *I should also mention that the IS-2 (along with alot of guns/cannons/tanks) don't necessarily have to withstand the force of the impact, just the force required to bring a much smaller, lighter object to a relatively high speed given the explosion of the propellant. Which has somewhere to go besides being completely contained, it will push the shell down the barrel with the expanding gases from the propellant ignition and once it exits the muzzle, the gases will be diverted along with a majority of that force. Though the cannon *does* need to withstand the peaks of pressure created by this interaction
@5co7568 ай бұрын
@@richardzehe1552 The force or energy is the same , imagine accelerating a 25kg shell at 800m/s in milliseconds . This is Newtons third law , you can't trick that . 😅 It's not like you shoot a 25kg shell out of the barrel and on impact it hits the tank with a pick up truck at 800m/s . That's like if somebody gets hit with a shotgun in movies and flys 5m back , the shooter would also fly 5m back .
@richardzehe15528 ай бұрын
@@5co756 Not to make this comment thread anymore unbearably long but bear with me. I did specifically avoid saying a vehicle "moving at 800m/s", which seems to be the misinterpretation/miswording here that I've caused, to clarify no, I do not think another tank being hit by a 25kg shell moving 800m/s is the same as a vehicle moving at 800m/s. It would be roughly the same amount of force as being hit by a 3500lb vehicle (roughly a family sedan) moving at 96.1m/s (215mph) If that helps to clarify. I Wasn't sure what common place item many people, who aren't very involved in learning about force delivered to a target vs. Projectile Energy would find commonplace. A better comparison would be to state that a 5.56x45mm FMJ (55grains) produces about 1,294 ft/lbs of muzzle *energy* HOWEVER it would only exert a maximum of 0.79 lbf *against a target at a range of 1km.* I did notice however that I used ft/lbs in place of lbf in some places and will correct that in previous comments as they are separate measurements with different purposes. I should also point out that recoil felt for the IS-2 and its crew is not the same as being hit by the projectile; energy dispersion time differences, vehicle weight, cannon component strengths etc. the recoil from the gun of the IS-2 is dispersed over a longer period of time than say the Impact of the shell on target. 1-2 seconds of energy dispersion vs. milliseconds for the impact of the projectile. Another reason why cannons have very large heavy components and are usually found on even heavier vehicles along with having recoil dampening systems in place. For the same reasons that when you shoot a rifle, the rifle doesn't recoil hard enough to go through your shoulder the same as the bullet would, that along with the width, height, etc. of the buttstock against your shoulder and the overall firearms weight. M56 is another good example, 90mm shell but it kicks the front end of the vehicle up to a foot or more off of the ground when it fires; the vehicle is not heavy enough to mitigate the recoil effectively but the breach and barrel are strong enough to withstand the blast inside moving the shell. Not so much a trick of newtons law but you are giving that force a place to go with the equal and opposite force exerted within the cannon. This is also what keeps a cannon from say, ripping the turret off the tank that is firing it, recoil absorption and mitigation along with lots of meticulous vehicle design. I appreciate the respectful way you went about having this discussion and I apologize for how long this all ended up being, I definitely could have worded several things better 😅 anyways, cheers
@pootis_gaming995 ай бұрын
*d o n ' t e v e r c a l l i t f u n*
@FatherGrigori8 ай бұрын
Volumetric really screwed this thing over because who would've thought that a 122 aphe shell can't fit in many places. Also I hope your surgery went well if you had that yesterday
@Spookston8 ай бұрын
I don't have it until next week
@FatherGrigori8 ай бұрын
@@Spookston I may be stupid
@Spookston8 ай бұрын
@FatherGrigori it was delayed
@Desertable18878 ай бұрын
either way I hope it goes well man
@lukedavies84678 ай бұрын
What are you having surgery on
@Grayson2038 ай бұрын
Your continued usage of halo music, references, and sound effects has singlehandedly brought back enough noatalgia that i went and bought the master chief collection. I finished all of Reach yesterday, started working on CE this morning.
@arandomdude38318 ай бұрын
1:42, 2:27 When a 122mm APHE successfully fuses on an un-angled 25mm plate but fails to do any damage to a 30mm angled plate:
@superspies328 ай бұрын
I used to shoot to the back of this tank's turret with M109A1 and it received NO DAMAGE, then it oneshoted me. Respawned with M41A1 and returned, load APDS to it and the shell CANNOT PENETRATE it, then it hit 1 pixel of the commander's hatch and ammo racked me.
@SammyBun8 ай бұрын
Them removing the satisfying clunk when firing this gun is the worst thing they ever did to this game
@Soup_Pumpkin8 ай бұрын
When the 120S comes out you should play that
@r3acsroach9858 ай бұрын
Already did
@That_Montage_Nerd5 ай бұрын
9:50 yeah that was a literal mugging. Dude came out of the alley way and shanked you
@furious_gaming14furious_ga918 ай бұрын
one fortune cookie a video should be the new tradition
@alexmaximus91348 ай бұрын
Since volumetric made the 122 a nightmare to use, you can try the T-44 with the 85mm gun. It's quite fast, it can sometimes tank a poorly aimed AP shell but the gun is not strong enough for most things frontally, so you gotta flank them. And seeing that you love that playstyle, i think you can make it work.
@NotTrenchify8 ай бұрын
3:20 "Are you serious" "Youve gyeaott to be pulling my leg" "You cannot be real"
@Michael-uc2pn8 ай бұрын
Gaijin was not, in fact, pulling his leg.
@courage048 ай бұрын
@@Michael-uc2pn gyat?
@davidfornazier8 ай бұрын
BINGO!
@Dia.dromes8 ай бұрын
Spookstin GYATT confirmed?
@user-fe7bo5mm1o8 ай бұрын
jeez louise
@crispy63118 ай бұрын
I just discovered this channel and thank you... most WT channels are a cacophony of memes and sound bites but I finally found one I can actually watch! Great stuff.
@ivanwrsong47928 ай бұрын
You might enjoy dollar plays as well.
@Kapputter8 ай бұрын
Man, I have such a love-Hate relationship with the IS-2. Sometimes it IT go boom, sometimes I go boom
@damnsonwheredyoufindthis.38307 ай бұрын
It be like that, its gun is still great for the br besides the occasional bs where it crumples against armor a 122mm probably shouldn't. Its armor seems very unreliable tho and the tall siluette that im glad IS 3 seems to fix. Sometimes the armor works wonders, sometimes it can't stop a fart downwind. Ik it has weak spots like any tank but wiggle em or nah the enemies tend to land their shots even over great distances. Best method this far seems sidescraping while hiding the front behind a big rock or building tho, unless they got heat.
@yulu8038 ай бұрын
Forturn cookie: you have every reason to be confident Spook: Drive infront of a million tanks unscathed and hits a sick moving shot I guess I should start ordering more takeaways
@TyrannicalTimmy8 ай бұрын
Gunner needs to do some yoga after every battle
@pot85527 ай бұрын
6:56 spookston when he discovers missing a shot:
@cyansphere33948 ай бұрын
Gaijin toward 122mm D-25 guns be like: "Pay real money for KV-122, or suffer"
@IvanTre3 ай бұрын
I have a full lineup of these and while yes, Tiger 2 gun is kinda better, IS-2 is still pretty good. Anyway, if you downtier it, it absolutely bullies the Germans. When they were 6.3 and you got a full downtier, it was absurd..
@thictiger33028 ай бұрын
Okay now do the ISU-122s. It’s legitimately fun, mainly because the reload isn’t 80 billion years, only 40 billion. I love it on long range maps ngl
@blumpfreyfranks88638 ай бұрын
Attempt number 22 at getting Spookston to play any tank with a dozer blade, the catch is, he has to dig in before engaging targets. Movement around the map is allowed, but he has to dig in again before reengaging.
@daddylongglegs8 ай бұрын
just dozer blade whole game
@kirishima6388 ай бұрын
What a pointless mechanic!!!
@jaydennighthawk78158 ай бұрын
Day 125 of asking spookston to play the Btr-80a
@MoonWeasel238 ай бұрын
Given the utter inconsistency of shooting tanks in this game, Gaijin May as well add the Afghanistan tech tree. Toyota Hylux with a Dshk, a dirt bike with a dood holding an RPG, no planes, but you get a 5 ton suicide car. All at 10.0 of course
@lukevelderman40408 ай бұрын
And captured U.S vehicles, but every component starts at a dark orange.
😂😂😂 Y did this make me wheeze. Bro had me on life support
@vassiliblucher27638 ай бұрын
Afghan tech tree that consists of a t55, bmp1, btr70 and trucks with guns and ofc a mig21 and also it will be a subtree in the israeli one with some other arab stuff
@frf50008 ай бұрын
Imagine how many captured american premiums they can sell.
@TwistedMajora6 ай бұрын
12:19 He doubted the fortune cookie and it still delivered on that shot.
@FatherGrigori8 ай бұрын
I think a video on the m2a2 light tank would be both fun for you and funny for us, a win win for eveyone
@Sprixyy8 ай бұрын
Bro I was literally playing this thing last night and I enjoyed it a lot just the long reload is hard to manage, sweet video
@Kulepennstrek8 ай бұрын
That shot at 3:16 reminds me that I'm having tracks block shots a lot more frequently than usual lately.
@knightplatinum96768 ай бұрын
It's better to over shoot then under shoot, as if you overshoot while aiming at the hull, you may hit the head, if you undershoot, you hit the ground
@SamuelBruyn5 ай бұрын
as a person who has been playing for a while and maxed out everything in the game, I was so excited for this video ngl and its a banger aswell. The is-2 is one of the most fun heavy tanks in the game and i would recommend everyone to use it.
@wol06fi898 ай бұрын
This is now the 23rd time I've asked Spookston to play the DF 105. I don't even remember how many days it's been💀
@jayp.83608 ай бұрын
that shot on the scorpion didn't even fuse, some poor commander watched his gunner get physically removed from the vehicle by a 122
@10arron8 ай бұрын
Since you have now played the most frustrating heavy tank, it's time to play the most frustrating tank destroyer, Zachlam Tager time baby.
@randallinu8 ай бұрын
One of my most used vehicles (IS-6 being #1). But man oh man do the IS tanks not give the most grief with that lonnnng ahh reload time. Waiting ≈20 per IS shot is hell. Great video, man! I love seeing you use my favorite nations heavy tanks.
@damnsonwheredyoufindthis.38307 ай бұрын
it was worth the wait with regular is2, but since is2 1944 can already have difficulties penning targets in uptier the 20 seconds really becomes a pain. Can't imagine how unreliable that gun becomes with is3 and above. I mean yeah aiming has a lot to do with it, but in some situations you gotta be quick on your feet and risk it or die, if you miss the weak spot big deal take cover and try again right? well with other tanks anyway, with IS tanks if you miss a weak spot and non pen, you either A: lose 20% of your sanity from wasting a chance and having to wait humiliating 20 seconds, or B: they know you have a long reload and will just rush you. If i need to aim for tiny weakspots like anyone else but have twice the reload i don't think its a good tradeoff to have big boom anymore. It was fair for when you can almost pen enemies anywhere to kinda balance it out. Moment of silence to kv2 users tho who almost have double the reload, would honestly leave the match if i missed with that
@Misdemeanorv24 ай бұрын
@@damnsonwheredyoufindthis.3830 The gun honestly does not struggle much on the IS-3 and IS-4, after playing the IS series tabks for a long time I figured that they can pen just about anything if you aim properly
@kimjanek6468 ай бұрын
After the patch the Tiger II H gun has a new or changed gun breech that sits waaaay too far in the back of the turret for the loader to be able to reload the gun.
@Project_Warfare8 ай бұрын
Holy hell that fortune cookie was correct after that shot you made after reading it!
@crusader-j41268 ай бұрын
Honestly the only reason the IS-2 or any 122mm gun feels so bad is Volumetric, the smallest section of armor even a 10mm sheet metal plate will act like its made out of the core of a neutron star. the IS-2 used to be one of my fav tanks in the entire game now its just.. depressed and sad due to how many times my BR-471D has been stopped by a German Gun ball mount / Coax Gun barrel or the driver view ports of tanks
@panzerwafflez72288 ай бұрын
Honestly the only reason the IS2 is still viable at 6.7 is either reverse driving IS2s and also BS Volumetric armor. The amount of times I've bounced IS2 mantlets/turret fronts in 76mm/90mm/88mms drives me insane...
@itsmekermit41368 ай бұрын
I used to love it too had a lot of fun with it. Even with volumetric it used to do fine. I lost the faith in it when it non penned panther turret from front (i know it can go through panther front plate) but still. Gaijin has nerfed the 122 in few recent updates, sometimes it just non pens, bounces or does nothing. Pair that with the horrible reload speed it does not feel worth it. At least is3 has armor benefit, is2's whole huge lower front plate is a weak spot.
@Gungho735 ай бұрын
I'm impressed how almost 10 minutes in you had 3 enemies that actually understood and tried to coordinate around firing lanes to leave you no answer. A lot of the videos its kinda like, they saw you *bap* or your weak armor/end was available to hit. But that was just good teamwork there it seemed! Kudos to that group that day.
@DewpeeSnewBa118 ай бұрын
Soviet Gun depression = Your gun gives you depression
@ADudOverTheFence18 ай бұрын
4:16 "Can I get some gun depression por favor". Dutch Van Der Linde energy
@ThatTrafficCone8 ай бұрын
8th time challenging Spookston to bring the Char 25t into an 8.3 lineup, and then incrementally increase the BR until the tank becomes actually unplayable.
@nobleman93938 ай бұрын
@@russman3787 Or increase the repair costs for France.
@Collat3ralD4mage8 ай бұрын
Spookston using fortune cookies to increase luck while playing war thunder is content I never knew I needed
@nattly63408 ай бұрын
now on this episode of "light tank flanker enthusiest plays heavy tank with no gun depression and a long reload"
@noahsawesomevids4228 ай бұрын
I love to bully those tanks but it’s confusing how m6a1 and m36 are way too tanky
@CT-ww7yi8 ай бұрын
M42 contraero video when, it’s so good trust
@LAVODKA128 ай бұрын
8:03 "lights seeing a heavy" Edit 11:53 spookston asmr
@g09h8 ай бұрын
IS-2 1944 is pretty goofy looking
@zdendajirasko81888 ай бұрын
Tbh it looks better then the 1943 one
@nightnovis8 ай бұрын
Even more with the net modification
@zembagaming78418 ай бұрын
@@nightnovischicken coop
@tricksterjoy97408 ай бұрын
It’s basically a light tank turret on a heavy tank chassis with a massive chin, and somehow the tracks seem too small for it. (Appearance wise)
@lector-dogmatixsicarii15378 ай бұрын
Average Soviet design philosophy shitting up the irl vehicle moment.
@cccc2852 ай бұрын
Is-2 being able to have an is-6 on team is insane
@isleep248 ай бұрын
Day 21 of asking Spookston to play the Sk 105A2
@no-legjohnny36918 ай бұрын
What I don't understand is why the IS-2s got nerfed. I understand Russian bias is a bit of a thing in War Thunder, but not for the IS-2. Even back when the 1943 model was 5.7 and the 1944 model was 6.3, they weren't considered very good because of that lengthy reload. But now they're 6.3 and 6.7 respectively and they're just not up to snuff compared to the King Tigers or the T34 heavy tank.
@therealspeedwagon14517 ай бұрын
Not to mention that they’re also going up against tanks from the 70s and 80s in many cases. I don’t even like seeing the PT-76 to be honest, it just ruins the immersion of a WWII tank on a WWII battlefield and all the sudden seeing a light tank from the early 1950s. I’m not ready yet for the game to turn into a Korean War/ Operation Unthinkable simulator.
@scorpbyt6098 ай бұрын
Day 3 of asking Spookston to play the M103
@unclesam57338 ай бұрын
If you think it sits on too high a BR play T32s. A 7.7 tank with a worse gun than the IS2 only faces APDS and HEAT, completely ignoring your only advantage - armor.
@gunther25558 ай бұрын
Ahh man, I suffered so much on T32's against soviet T-54's, T-55's and IS-4/6/7. And then I unlocked M103. I still struggled but it somewhat helped.
@unclesam57338 ай бұрын
@gunther2555 I absolutely love the looks of T32, but that thing is so bad on its BR. The M103 is OK, but that HEAT does no DMG at all, and AP bounces off everything for some reason. As much as I love both tanks, they are currently really bad. On the same BR, I can take Vickers mk.1 and obliterate anything.
@gunther25558 ай бұрын
@@unclesam5733 agree, HEAT is so random and frustrating and at the reload time is basically a death sentence if you miss/don't pen/kill gunner/commander, so you have to play very carefully.
@unclesam57338 ай бұрын
@gunther2555 Exactly. Took out M103 yesterday. Failed to side pen Centurion mk.10 3x times with the AP. Frontaly, I managed to take out his driver, lmao. Why does that AP bounce of everything? It used to be really good, I got a few nukes with that thing. I just don't understand how can 120mm AP be so bad, but I guess that's just Gaijin logic.
@gunther25558 ай бұрын
@@unclesam5733 Volumetrics broke the big calibre AP shells🥴. I suffered equally on IS-2's, the Jagdpanther and T-54
@TheMouseInTheDrain8 ай бұрын
Day 67 of asking Spookston to play the ikv 72
@blacksky121_8 ай бұрын
When this and the t44 were 6.3 it was a very good lineup, especially combined with the t44122 which was basically if the aforementioned tanks had a baby
@fabianj.51288 ай бұрын
"now it is a speedrun depression" Try playing Strv 101... This is a world record
@gamergumilyov85798 ай бұрын
Just play the normal Cent. Mark 3, it has an overall worse lineup and Shell Shatters more often because gaijin hates NATO tanks (except Israel/sweden)
@@fabianj.5128 everyone knows playing UK means that you hate yourself and as a UK main i agree using solid shot is handicapping yourself when a tank with less pen can one shot the same shot
@painiswarthunder8 ай бұрын
That drivers optic is insane, I hit a part of it that was over 500mm thick in the hangar.
@mark123586 ай бұрын
T44-100 is your thing.
@theonlyhamster3 ай бұрын
12:10 "You have every reason to be confident, uurrrr No I F***Ing don't! Do you see what tank I'm in??" ~ Spookston 2024 playing an overpowered IS2
@einbaerchen29958 ай бұрын
I think the IS-2 has the same problem as the Tiger II, it's an amazing almost OP tank when it's top tier and it absolutely sucks when its low tier. The whole 6.0-6.7 range is just somewhat broken in that regard.
@einbaerchen29958 ай бұрын
@@russman3787 I don't mean they are the same. They're actually quite different despite being "heavy tanks". But both are hard to kill in a down tier and kill almost anything they face in one shot. What the IS-2 lacks in reload speed it makes up in size, the much smaller profile makes it easier to hide and take cover. The armour protection is less on paper but it's stalinium with weird angles that magically bounces shots, so who knows. I do think the Tiger II is a better tank in the game tho, if you play it right.
@yeet64788 ай бұрын
I'd like to see you play "Celere Sahariano" the italy premium tank at br.2.7 (He looks very cute)
@TheGoodGeneral598 ай бұрын
6.7 is just an absolute mess in general. ALL Pershings are 6.7, so you literally have the triangle of speed (M26), armor (Jumbo Persh) and firepower (Super Persh) in one lineup, alongside the other American super heavies
@JimmySaulGoodmanMcGill19608 ай бұрын
@@shahramtondkarmobarakie1824 the is-2 1944 is just ridiculous too
@Sigurdur_the_bumbling_idiot8 ай бұрын
@@JimmySaulGoodmanMcGill1960 in what way? armor=no speed=no firepower=ehh reload=NO 50cal that destroys planes=YES
@JimmySaulGoodmanMcGill19608 ай бұрын
@@Sigurdur_the_bumbling_idiot ridiculously bad I meant
me being a lvl 20 player playing agains the US in 6.7 looking at range ''is that a M62, M62E1, a T26E1-1, a T26E5 or one of the heavy tanks?''
@DiretheAlphaWolfogen8 ай бұрын
I've recently started watching your videos and I have fallen in love with them tbh. I find them very funny and interesting to watch. Maybe you can try to play either the Vilkas or you can play the M22 Locust
@marlenacooper31658 ай бұрын
Day 91 of asking Spookston to play the t-35.
@TheCodMineMan8 ай бұрын
Spookston trying not to get bombed challenge (Impossible)
@Chopstorm.8 ай бұрын
Remember the old 122mm sound? God that was so good.
@ousou788 ай бұрын
Loved the metalic sound, why Gaijin changed it?
@Sigurdur_the_bumbling_idiot8 ай бұрын
@@ousou78 everytime i heard the 122mm i thought to myself "thy end is now"
@blueflames69618 ай бұрын
Really like the IS-2s. Good reverse gear, decent armor. The gun hits like a train. Slow reload forces you to play carefully.
@Ostrovskymaksim-ir2pk8 ай бұрын
yeah... against Tiger 2's with a better gun/pen/reload rate and better armor, really fun :D
@eggshapedisraelioperative63178 ай бұрын
Why does this is-2 have such fucking smooth suspension that it may as well be stabilised, while the amx m4, which is even heavier, has helium tanks attached to its tracks, making it bounce all over the place?
@pencilcase80688 ай бұрын
The amx is French so they were busy protesting while designing the tank suspension
@dinochookproductions51908 ай бұрын
amx m4 is so good now since it got its shell buffed
@eggshapedisraelioperative63178 ай бұрын
@@dinochookproductions5190 I agree, I have a k/d of almost 3 with it, which is by far my highest of all the vehicles I regularly use. I still get jealous and salty when I get nuked with a poorly aimed aphe round though
@sphinxthegamecrasher55768 ай бұрын
One amazing part about the IS-2 is the suspension, you can often stop way before your opponents and fire or even fire on the move (unless they have stabilizers)
@AverageRussianMain5 ай бұрын
why was it the Xvideo's X on 0:31
@Grey_throat_arknights3 ай бұрын
LOL
@niclaszelmer47622 ай бұрын
Why did you recognize it
@akahelpwttubers2 ай бұрын
@@niclaszelmer4762 why do you ask
@C0URIER6.02 ай бұрын
Ayo
@dogcatchen3 ай бұрын
I don't know how to explain it but the IS-2 is the most "Tank-looking" Tank there is
@FrostOperator90-YT6 ай бұрын
Thank you for playing such an iconic vehicle that is very often ignored. It's appreciated to see someone giving this legend the attention it needs. Yeah, 6.7 is a tad bit overwhelming, but to my honest surprise the IS-2 1944 holds up great, showing just how good of a vehicle this really is. Love you Spook, you're based 💙 ☮️😎
@Random_Gaming2168 ай бұрын
Spookston: NooO My GUn DepREssiOn Is Too BaD also spookston: 9:17 Proceeds to murder a child
@thelazygamer13708 ай бұрын
We need a fortune cookie for every video from now on
@quinlanreid53552 ай бұрын
I almost forgot that before BR decompression in the USSR tree, this and the IS-6 were both 6.7 💀
@zenknight48398 ай бұрын
I always love every time spook gets slapped down when his hubris reaches a certain level 😂
@tubarao_de_calcinha93468 ай бұрын
hearing spookston saying "por favor" as a brazilian viewer really made my day, thank you ♡
@afoxinafoxhole78918 ай бұрын
Day 12 of asking Spookston to play some of the worst spaa in game, the M19/42 dusters
@juusolatva8 ай бұрын
this was added in the update today: "In Ground Realistic Battles, the ability to fly a nuclear carrying aircraft without leaving the current controlled vehicle has been added."
@tricksterjoy97408 ай бұрын
Imagine the controls are slaved together so every input effects both vehicles.
@Porkor238 ай бұрын
Since you like heavy tanks, please try playing the American M103 at 7.7
@hi_d9338 ай бұрын
you did not just encounter a ATGM carrier at 6.3
@jonathanarcoren58928 ай бұрын
Spookston you should rename this video "spookston slow descent into madness" lol.
@Fatman2218 ай бұрын
Every time Spookston says "Nyoooo!" I am rejuvenated.
@followerofthemantle34898 ай бұрын
At this point I just think that Stalin misheard his generals talking about depression, thinking it had to deal with the morale of his troops, and told them to get rid of it, and everyone was too scared of him to correct or disobey him.
@GeneraI_Motors8 ай бұрын
7:25 Personally I get it. If I die on a flank/cap, usually that flank/cap is the one I wanted to play or value the most. When I respawn, I will go back, and remember the person who killed me as I now deem them the biggest threat to my team, and my personal goals.
@LoneWolf-kw3ol8 ай бұрын
Attempt 3 of asking Spooky boi to play the Su-100 and La-5b, two of my favorite vehicles in the game. I used to love the IS-2 1944 until people got smart and started aiming for the lower plate and gaijin fixed the Soviet turret angle bugs that made the IS-1/2 turrets almost immortal.
@monstertruckin01378 ай бұрын
Spookston you should try the T-10A. It hasn’t much changed since it was first added but it is so much fun to play once you know the enemies weakspots. The mobility is really good, the armor is decent enough to stop some rounds, the short stab is amazing along with the high zoom optics, the twin Dshks can rip apart most lights, and a 16 second reload ain’t half bad for a 122. It’s my favorite heavy in the game and I’d love to see you revisit it.
@gunther25558 ай бұрын
For some weird reasons I had much better time with chinese IS-2's instead of Soviet IS-2's
@SilentButDudley8 ай бұрын
Yeah the Obj 248 is still my go to in that lineup. The 100mm is just so much better to carry games with. Do feel like it should be 6.3 since the T44-100 is substantially better at just .3 higher.
@benjammin33818 ай бұрын
they do not balance tanks based on its comparison to one vehicle alone. The obj 248 would be too good at a lower br. I have it too and i love it.
@MrJinglejanglejingle8 ай бұрын
"That scorpion is still alive" ...FUCKING WHAT SCORPION!? My man's detected an enemy vehicle from a colorless blob of background noise.
@mr_resource50998 ай бұрын
Soviet gun depression gives me depression, and I don't even play soviet vehicles
@SunsetSlot8 ай бұрын
Challenge: For high tier support a nation's MBT with its respective APC/IFV counterpart (ie Abrams/Bradley, T90/BMP2M, etc.) Challenge is keeping the other player alive and supporting it without stealing kills (breaking barrels, tracking, repairing, etc) it being a random should help make it interesting. Attempt #2
@Cpd8794 ай бұрын
As you like to play light and nimble tanks, I recommend you to play the JPz 4-5 as it is very fast and nimble and has 300+ mm pen on HEAT-FS
@averywebb11798 ай бұрын
This is the last time spookston will EVER doubt a fortune cookie
@omppusolttu57998 ай бұрын
Spookston be like: The gun lacks depression, but I certainly don't.