The Most Terrifying Theory Scientists Don’t Even Want To Talk About

To play the Chaos Game
www.geogebra.o...
I set the number of points to be 3, clicked start, and set the speed to ‘fast’.
The key takeaway of chaos is this: even when your equations are perfectly deterministic, you cannot know the initial conditions of arbitrary sensitivities.
When the present determines the future, but, the approximate present does not approximately determine the future, is “Chaos”.

[@fumomofumosarum5893]

Flexl: " Looks familiar, right? " Me: " The Triforce, from Legend of Zelda! " Flexl: " It is indeed the sierpinski triangle. " Me: " Aw... dammit... "

[@CryptoScammers.DoNotSendMoney]

Aka the super triforce

[@onyxrose3407]

I thought so too😂

[@citomp1240]

The creator of Zelda knew about the Sierpinski triangle.

[@scottrettig5608]

if a flap of a butterflies wing could cause a tornado somewhere else in the world, i now suddenly feel bad for every time i have ever farted.

[@rebwarwar5184]

🤣

[@Troof_Da_God]

Top comment. lol

[@JasonKing-m6m]

Put a cork in it...

[@cholleydanyel9558]

😂

[@jamesgrey13]

Look out world, here comes hurricane Jimmy!! **squeaky fart**

[@peraiahvelpula9294]

there's a book called whispers of manifestation on borlest , and it talks about how using some secret tehniques you can attract almost everything in life it's not some bullshit law of attraction, it's the real deal

[@Magnus_1996]

Tell me more! Who wrote the book?

[@CinematicSoul80]

Click that bites 😉

[@louiscolborn6715]

So way are you not rich and powerful. May as well tell me about some magic God

[@mattsvoid]

@@louiscolborn6715Rewatch the video and you’ll have your answer.

[@theanglerfish]

umm i must say...if something working for someone it's not guaranteed it will also work for you so do it your own way if you can

[@klaushubbertz7009]

Chaos is just an euphemistic term for man's extremely restricted ability to grasp infinity ...

[@louiscolborn6715]

You are infinitely correct 🤔

[@youbetyourwrasse]

@@louiscolborn6715 NO. but nice word play fun have.

[@sleepyinterface8819]

Totally agree! The seasons, days, months, they're all cyclic. We think the universe is also cyclic

[@klaushubbertz7009]

@@sleepyinterface8819 BINGO!! Yesterday the Big Bang, tomorrow afternoon the Big Crunch, rinse, repeat ... and humans are still fighting about "ideas" ...🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@johnphelps7519]

Expect next you'll claim we exist only in some computer program.

[@WitchidWitchid]

Scientists may not want to talk about it. But Mathematicians are more than glad to talk about it. 😃

[@Rafiki9112]

No, they're not.. at what exact altitude does the horizon stop being horizontal...🌅🦧🎈🌛🤙

[@Hankinit9]

The study of large numbers

[@crysstoll1191]

Engineers, too. Love the stuff.

[@louiscolborn6715]

That adds up 😂

[@louiscolborn6715]

​@@Rafiki9112it's never horizontal, it's horizon-taly, as in almost-ish horizontal, ✨🤨😆

[@BennyMcGhee]

There’s more than one butterfly in the world flapping its wings. The scariest thing about the universe is that our tiny little brains are capable of taking it all in. Imagine a brain the size of the Sun. Or a galaxy. Indeed, the entire universe could be one giant brain. Either way, we are all individually burdened with the weight of our own existence. Sometimes it takes getting really stoned to understand the heaviness of it all.

[@adamjosey1543]

It is what it is. Say no to drugs, kids.

[@Ekam-Sat]

There's nothing heavy about it. What it comes down to is that we are different in life for love. Please read some of the realizations by such saints as Anandamayi Ma, Rabindranath Tagore or Jesus.

[@lendalennuk2484]

@@Ekam-Sat ... and Krishnamurti.

[@david_cop_a_feel7538]

@@adamjosey1543 - Thank God for that! Can you just imagine if it wasn't? (what it was)

[@david_cop_a_feel7538]

The drawback to that is that, even though you 'figure it all out' while hashed out to the shits, once it wears off you can't quite put your finger on it.

[@10thdim]

What a nice summation of chaos theory! Love it. I believe it’s easier to envision all this when we remember that our reality is defined not in linear/causal 4D spacetime, but in the five dimensions of the quantum wavefunction.

[@charlesmiller8107]

5D quantum wavefunction? A quantum process can be described in any number of dimensions depending on the object or process under observation.

[@m_e_t_a_p_h_o_r]

Smart but agree there is no 'the' 5 Dimensions friend, fractal dimensions would surely go on toward infinity or to a return point possibly, until it all collapses back to fold into one

[@10thdim]

The quantum wavefunction is calculated in what Hawking called “imaginary time, at right angles to spacetime”. Everett said his Many Worlds exist within “a subspace orthogonal to spacetime”. Kip Thorne describes the “multiple branching 4D world tubes bending in the warped geometries of the tesseract” that a hypothetical 5D observer would see. The additional degree of freedom afforded by the fifth dimension allows for the probabilistic forms of chaos and causality that Schrödinger was envisioning when he said “I insist upon the view that all is waves”.

[@m_e_t_a_p_h_o_r]

They are powerful theories. I don't feel the 5th dimension would 'see' the other dimensions unless it had a method of analysis, like we try to understand the quantum level, but it may be a realm experiencing more freedom. I agree with the warping within a tesseract but my knowledge of geometry and division denotes no end to the dimensions... Like 11th is highest... How exactly? Anyway we belong to a race that utilises nuclear energy for warfare so we don't deserve to know the 'secrets' of the Universe. We can't even be civil to each other.

[@mactabilis6039]

"irregularity is a charecteristic property" isn't irregularity a measure of the complexity of an "algebraic surface" while charecteristic property refer to identification and classification system, particularly substances. my mind is blown btw, thanks OP! great work!

[@david_cop_a_feel7538]

When people use quotation marks, it is imperative that what is between the marks is exact. Otherwise you could be accused of twisting a person's words or trying to manipulate the audience with lies.

[@Nonononono_Ohno]

The best part of the video starts here: 20:39

[@Mercurio-Morat-Goes-Bughunting]

The butterfly effect is when some egomaniacal primate singles out one butterfly among 28 billion buterflies, all flapping their wings at the same time in Brazil, and saying that this particular butterfly is to blame for a dust-devil in Australia 127 years, 6 months, 3 days, 12 hours 38 minutes and 12.9567831427 seconds later...as opposed to any other butterfly which flapped it's wings in that moment in time. The Butterfly Effect is confirmation bias on the grand scale, randomly confusing cause and effect because no-one stops to ask if the flap of the butterfly's wing causes the change in the air current or if it is the change in the air current which is the reason that the butterfly chooses that precise moment to flap it's wing in a particular direction.

[@eddiehubbs9492]

U must have went to middle school I didn't mak it past 5yh grade u no some big words

[@vc7393]

So, this is someone that like to talk about them selves, and just thinks their smart?

[@timroderick2314]

Precisely. Made a decent movie though.

[@vc7393]

@@eddiehubbs9492 And you have obviously have no sense of humor.

[@eddiehubbs9492]

I magine u philosophize about all the bad in the world but what do you do to help it

[@wadeedden4552]

Thermodynamics and its laws are a good place to start to study chaos theory. Even though individual particles of a gas move randomly we can predict temperature, pressure, and volume. Keep in mind that the ontology of thermodynamics includes a caveat. Included in the analysis is the requirement of a quasistatic, adiabatic process. If you want a more humanistic idea of this you should read Issac Asimov and his Foundation series of books. The premise of the Foundation series relies on the “gas laws” of classical physics to sketch out the story.

[@FixItStupid]

Nuclear Bonds Good To Know ??? & So Fluoride In The Water By LAW ? Oh Why ??? & Schools ??? Lawyer Greed Law

[@transientaardvark6231]

I'm afraid you've got that completely wrong. I mean, what you say is correct but it's missing the point. The whole point about thermodynamics is that the tiny (or even quite large) differences don't matter, they all average out to well behaved phenomena. The point of chaos is that the tiniest differences matter massively and can lead to hugely different outcomes.

[@arturofuente4832]

@@transientaardvark6231 Thanks for the info.

[@wadeedden4552]

I understanding there is sensitive dependence on initial conditions. The epiphenomenon of order in the midst the thermodynamics is transitory whilst the final result is predictable. I must say that your posted video is very spot on and mostly complete, thank you for that.@@transientaardvark6231

[@mactabilis6039]

thanks wade! you comment, too, is informative.

[@Edenismdotca]

Thank you for taking the time to make this video. This topic absolutely fascinating!

[@OneBriteStar]

Unpredictability does not imply randomness. Notice that chaos theory only works where there is a pre-established set of rules, and those rules are determined by a conscious observer.

[@Willy_Tepes]

We do not know the rules. We are currently trying to figure them out by observation but it seems not everything can be observed and not everything can be observed objectively.

[@AssetH8ut2]

There does not have to be a conscious observer.

[@ConnoisseurOfExistence]

Laws of nature aren't determined or dependent on conscious observer.

[@boblydecker5951]

The “Laws of Nature” are EXCLUSIVELY the observations of humans. I believe that the entire Universe is Schrodinger’s Box; All possibilities existing simultaneously, in a state of infinite potentialities, until the very moment it’s observed. It is IMPOSSIBLE to remove the observer from an experiment.

[@jacobbeaudoin4237]

The double split experiment and that other new one that came out recently using helium atoms proves light travels as a wave or particle until a conscious observer watches. It makes no sense I don't understand physics that well but I do know when they don't use a camera to observe the single light particle they shoot it goes through both slits creating a dissonance pattern and when it is observed it creates a single line meaning that conscious observers have an effect on the way light chooses to act. Interestingly enough it kind of confirms some of what the buddhist believe, that reality is generated from within and are thoughts, desires, and expectations have and effect on the world. That doesn't mean things we have no control over don't happen. It just means we always have the choice to choose how we personally react to everything and what we choose to attach ourselves to and what to ignore. A lot of people's reactions are formed by their parents friends family. Monkey see monkey do. Most people don't usually take the time to sit back and wonder why they react to the world the way they do. Got carried away I'm stoned. Reality may or may not be what any of us expect. It could all just be an illusion formed by our perceptions and state of mind. I mean every animal bug plant expirence a different version of reality whose to say ours is the ultimate true one. It's all subjective which is where Einstein comes in with his theory of relativity. Food for thought

[@1917WorkingClass]

Great food for the thinking mind. Adding new drawers to our cabinets of knowledge inside our minds. There's a lot of effort in the visuals as well; contributes to the video being of a higher standard. One room for improvement though, is to incorporate little silent voids, to process the presented information, and to prepare for what comes next. Plus, a rudimentary summary every now and then, to help each core piece of the theory to be stored, and to be stored in the right drawer.

[@DeepObserver7689]

The most unpredictable thing is our mind and Supreme Consciousness lying within whole matter of Universe 😌

[@MA4TU2]

Wow - what a great explanation. A complex topic that has been distilled down to 20m, a sign of brilliance. Excellent!

[@SolidSiren]

This is not a good explanation and this video appears to have about 30 minutes of work put into it.

[@Nonononono_Ohno]

@@SolidSiren Really? That much??

[@JMazzaTaz]

And I’ve never learned so much about fish in one video, so there’s that

[@Desmond-Dark]

@@JMazzaTaz 🤣

[@giannicallegari]

Good job, well done, guys! I am a physicist and have studied these phenomena, yet they do not cease to give me shivers and awe!

[@Nonononono_Ohno]

"Good job", "well done", "physicist", "have studied". Heard all that before. Déjà vu. Same questions to you too, therefore: Please do explain how the formulas and figures shown at 14:29 in the video clarify the narrative ("deterministic equations such as Newtons laws of motion do not always result in a deterministic universe"). In special, I would like to hear from you how the term in brackets, i.e. (t/T - x/λ), is derived in the formula at the top of the screen, center between left and right. As you can see, this term is being multiplied with E_k. How does it influence the result (i.e. the right side of the equation, 1/2 mv^2)? Also, please explain the role of the Δ symbol that occurs twice in the formula at the upper left of screen, and tell us how the large U-shaped object that's depicted middle right fits into the big picture. You've studied physics, so it should be an easy task for you.

[@Ekam-Sat]

By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another. - John 13:35 NIV

[@greywolf271]

@@Nonononono_Ohno He must have mixed up the Bible and his physics textbook

[@sailingaristos2472]

​@@Nonononono_Ohno Thank you, sir

[@sailingaristos2472]

​@@Ekam-Satwhat does that have to do with chaos theory?

[@DADela-ht6ux]

I read James Gleick's book over a decade ago. Brilliant. I've always excelled in mathematics, and there are dimensions within geometry we have yet to understand. My interests shifted toward quantum mechanics afterword. There's a multidimensional universe all around us. Up until recently, all we've been able to see and measure - from our limited 3D perspective - is the little shining spheres all around us. We haven't even figured out gravity yet. You can't create gravity without understanding levity. Excellent commentary!

[@AlexthunderGnum]

I think, it is stretched a bit too far. In the triangle example, all the dots positions were pre-determined. The probability had nothing to do with them. It was only the choice of "which one first and next". Of course, after a number of repetitions you see all the pre-determined dots revealed with the pattern. You didn't need the randomness to produce that result. You might as well simply enumerate all the choices in simple order. It would be less amusing to watch, of course, but may be that is the whole point? It is not about a discovery of something new and yet unknown, but really about entertainment and amusement. What is more amusing to watch happening, that is "the discovery", I suppose.

[@joeshmoe7967]

My first thought. The triangle patterns 'appears', due to starting with 3 dots AND the 'rule' to roll the dice and move from the half way point to the next point by the rule of where to go based on what was rolled. I bet starting with more points would end up creating a very predictable pattern. That example doesn't sell it for me.

[@oo7moses]

He used math to create a pattern! It's chaos!

[@AlexthunderGnum]

@@oo7moses What do you mean? I don't see any chaos. It looks like perfect order instead. Very predictable order. What was the surprise to you?

[@oo7moses]

@@AlexthunderGnum It was sarcasm!

[@louiscolborn6715]

It's kinda like: how many peas are in a pod true or false? 😊 How many basket balls does it take to get to the moon.

[@williamcorycory7836]

best thing i've seen since melody sheep's museum of alien life 2. thank you so much . big respect

[@miguelmartinez2488]

It makes me sad I can't have deep conversations like this with my family because they don't understand/care about this . Can't believe I understand this stuff.🎉

[@BreeBree-s6s]

Older souls have closed minds. They were raised in a different lighter light.

[@ÆtherealMIndset]

This video really sets my mind at ease. Recently, I thought I have been losing mind but it's just that silly old synchronous events arising amidst a sea of randomess and me getting the privilege of watching it unfold before me.... Uh.... Thing.... 😬😬 Some schizophrenic people aren't schizophrenic. They are wired for a type of pattern finding that isn't very understandable for the average person and some of the smaller, simpler patterns that arise in the deterministic lens we usually see life through go right over their head, so to say, so of course their language sounds all mix and matched. They are thinking about really, really, big things and don't have time to break the train of thought and step back down into "normal" reality for whomever they are talking too. Unfortunately, this process gives rise to very, very vivid recurrences of memories and mixed ideals that manifest as audio hallucinations due to neural feedback loops with an amplifying or postive output so their neural "volume" is very high as dopaminergic imbalances start to cascade into chaotic patterns that they desperately try to get a hold of. If we could just learn to communicate with them better without drugging them, we could "lead" them back from psychosis whenever they get there. I walk between both lines of thought freely. Probabilistic and deterministic and am now at this point in my life rapidly developing an intuitive understanding of when and how to switch between the two given certain contexts. The cure to psychosis is not being afraid of subjective thought. We as the modern West fear subjective thought so much though.

[@joshisdriven]

So with the fish... it's true that they will never all be in the exact same position with the exact same trajectory, inertia, momentum etc... BUT ONLY because of the limiter of time. Should the fish live forever and not age, they will 100% replicate the exact same situation infinite times. I'm not sure what the significance of this is but it's fun to consider.

[@joshisdriven]

so are these chaotic systems made possible by entropy?

[@SA-ui6hh]

That was the best summary . You put words and explanation on something deeply felt

[@chasepalagi7675]

3:00 your example is control disguised as chaos. You are marking in the middle of every roll. That is not chaos, that is a pattern. There is no other conceivable outcome.

[@Adam_Lyskawa]

Negative feedback loops usually provide stability. Positive feedback loops lead to destruction and chaos. However, the positive feedback loops are useful too when they are controlled. I wonder if the nature ever does it. In technology we use positive feedback loops in all kind of radios and signal generators (a resonance is a case of positive feedback) and in nuclear reactors, when a chain reaction is moderated. BTW, predator-pray loops used to be very stable until external environmental factors broke the stable conditions. Yes, it's another way of saying we broke it. However, even broken, destabilized systems can get back to equilibrium over time.

[@Lorrane-r1f]

Fascinating description. Well done! This is very useful information

[@Sent2Strike]

I love your channel mate! This blew my mind

[@johnnypoker46]

A butterfly flapping its wings could just as easily prevent a tornado from occurring, as cause one. So it's not worth worrying about

[@stevedickens-h5e]

well said, and quite true, it cant be simplified to something so simple as to say the butterfly flapping its wings will cause or delay or prevent this or that as its far more complicated then that and so many other variables are involved then just the butterfly alone. But I like the simple truth of the way you said it.

[@dukeon]

Just because a butterfly flapping its wings has consequences around the world in a way that’s so complex we could never trace the cause->effect throughline, doesn’t mean it’s random or probablistic at all. Everything (in this regime) is still deterministic, but absurdly complex. True probabilistic behavior is something like radioactive decay, though since we don’t fully understand quantum physics at a conceptual level, it’s possible even this type occurrence has an as-yet unseen cause. You could sum up the current state of physics by saying we have two understandings of reality: one deterministic (relativity) and one probabilistic (QM). They cannot both be true, yet it appears to us that they are.

[@davidwood2387]

The 3 dots in there positions all ready represent a triangle, so it will form many triangles .

[@Willy_Tepes]

If you understand geometry many things become obvious.

[@chrisrichardson8881]

As long as the three points are not co-linear. It can be a very obtuse form of a triangle.

[@jarnoronkainen75]

does that theory work lol... with that geogebra site ... do the same trick with 4 dots and you still get triangles :p~

[@Sutanreyu]

Plus, the scheme in which you play the chaos game is what makes the pattern: it's a wave function. Change the function and you get a different pattern.

[@david_cop_a_feel7538]

It's actually 'their', but thanks for dropping by.

[@gordoncouger9648]

This is a good overview of the unpredictability of even simple systems. Man has broken the wolf-deer system killing wolves to extension in some of their ranges because right or wrong at one time we saw them as a threat to human life and domestic livestock. We managed deer as desirable wildlife with economic value for hunters introducing to lands they never exsied. some years deer are so over poputaked they graze the green grass along the edge of paved roads, the only place withe enough moisture to grow grass, causing multiple fatal encounters with vehicles. There isn't a place in the USA with a large enough wolf population to cause a marked decline in the area's deer population,

[@erikblaas5826]

I had the Butterfly wings principle been thought in a different way..... The loose nail of a horse shoe can cause the loss of a war and the loss of a kingdom...

[@oopsadaze]

That's a Todd Rundgren song..."For the Want of a Nail', but it gets to the point of 'what else could the answer be?'

[@dareese6778]

& a loose tongue looses a girlfriend. 😢😅

[@ThoughtFrontier2050]

Financial markets can also be explained by chaos theory because small changes, like news events or decisions, can cause big and unpredictable swings in prices. While we can spot patterns or trends in the market, it’s very difficult to make exact long-term predictions because the system is so complex and sensitive to little changes.

[@kanubeenderman]

there are localized effects that have no bearing on macro systems. I'm not worried about a tornado storm when a cloud of butterflies take wing

[@tarawasjesus]

I now understand why a single dice is called a die. The thinking dead realm does "play dice." It's hissing gulping puffball is chaotic because you have no idea when it will kill you or when it will stop you from revealing it killed you. It is then you realize the uncertainty principle means, ultimately, what is symmetry. Well, the flashing complementary realm is not symmetrical because there is no conservation. The synthetics from the dead realm who quantum tunnel through lie they're real. So, the difference between a real fractal and an electric one is the real one doesn't want to kill you or use you as a battery. In this video they clearly squash the real fractals and electric fractals into one realm. They "renormalize." So, what the scientists are scared of, or should be, is that they've called zero pt mass and mass zero pt. The thinking part of the mass is what threw them because it is able to make light speed seem instantaneous through an energy exchange. That is the true illusion the real "illuminati" wants to bring to our understanding. Their conclusions are twisted. IOW, this should be that and that should be this.

[@noprivacyleft]

This video is perhaps adequate at describing a layman's superficial understanding of the subject matter, but never really explains what the "terrifying theory scientists don't want to talk about" is, or why it is "terrifying". This is pretty much click bait drivel as far as I can tell, but with a quite a bit of effort put into it, so slightly better than most click bait drivel. I clicked it, so it worked.

[@Nonononono_Ohno]

Yes, you clicked it and it worked, but only because of the clickbait title, right? And you stayed because of the clickbaity language ("but trust me, it's way more serious than you think"... conspiracy, anyone?). And if there's so much effort in it, why does it start right away with the mistake of presenting the butterfly effect as a "probabilistic mode" when in fact it's an example for deterministic (i.e., *not* probabilistic!) chaos?

[@sailingaristos2472]

Yes, and if anyone really listens to the video and ignores the tone of voice and fancy language, they'll find not much being said

[@bastiaan7777777]

@@sailingaristos2472 Sounds AI made..... And repedative.

[@Uyytrdf]

I especially like the way this video explains facts we know which within the first minute or 2 led me to realize that a fractal can be used to extrapolate an unknown barrier or zone and some of its limitations because a fractal will yield a shape or geometry to deduce the disturbance of the constant before and after the zone of uncertainty - based on the rate of fractalization scalar from known zone to unknown zone in function and in ratio thereby deducing the geometry (such as past a black hole or other side of one or a singularity or white hole quantum singularity )

[@abeautifulmindispoetrydefi5323]

Even E.T. said on several occasions that we do not understand what we are capable of doing, which is partly why they too live here on our planet with us. As some want to see our ascension up to the next level. Admittedly we have lots of faults as with many of the species that are tens of thousands of years ahead of us. Which I now hope will put things into perspective. Thank you for reading, and have a good night.

[@jeremygreen2439]

The Others have their faults, too, It is not quite THEY: golden and enlightened vs US: stupid and naval gazing (though yes). Weird things have happened. Some people are exploiting THEM. What we think as a "UFO" is sometimes an entire BODY that changes; sometimes it is a copy of a body or a vessel and such. There's so much to learn, it is like drinking from a hose

[@JohnGrandline]

they'll go extinct early haha

[@Technasma]

​@@JohnGrandlineNo worries you ll go "extinct" with them, worse is whats gonna come after

[@isaganipalanca8803]

Thanks for this brilliantly set out video essay! I've duly subscribed and liked!

[@tomato1040]

Like in Jazz🎺🎶, overcoming chaos comes from choosing🦉wisely,🤯improvisation in♾️the moment😂!

[@jackfroste]

Very nice summary of the complex topics of Chaos Theory.

[@BuffaloMotivated]

So you’re saying trying to create a hurricane from my farts isn’t out of reach. 🤔 Challenge accepted.

[@rich2fnrock]

a fartnado

[@theverseshed]

Go down the Sharnado route and you could end up with a 5-arsed Fartnado . . . . or even an Infinite Fartnado.@@rich2fnrock

[@StarmaxStarmax-zn3xt]

While using F=ma to illustrate the predictability of Newtonian physics, most people totally ignore (i.e. assume the model is 100% accurate) that we cannot know, deterministically, with 0% error, any of the values. There is always measurement error -- and when we hide it behind assumptions, we can only fool ourselves. This also touches on the concepts of Schrodinger's cat thought experiment. Now, consider the entire known universe to be the cat (quantum superposition). Can we know the state of the cat/universe without opening the box? How many states can the cat/universe have?

[@Holographic-Stallions.X0]

& will each observing party get a different set of measurements, as is implied, at least to my understanding, when one considers that reality is malleable & mutable to each particular hyphe-dimensional slice of perspectives, a.k.a. reality is different depending on the expectations of probability for each individual. Science continues to ignore this fact, which is really not very scientific of them. You know what I'm saying, dogg??💫🔮🪄

[@StarmaxStarmax-zn3xt]

@@Holographic-Stallions.X0 Scientists, like most humans, are very good at ignoring observations that do not fit into their model(s). Partly it is that we cannot recognize that which is outside of our "training" (to use an AI term), but a lot of it has to do with the fear that we face when we admit that we don't really understand it all. We prefer to remain infants -- trusting others to interpret reality for us.

[@the_proteus_void]

Probability breaks down at a certain point and determinism takes over as an event unfolds. Even if that transfer is only at a Planck distance in a Planck time away from the culmination of the event. Until then, some level of uncertainty still exists.

[@karlschmied6218]

No, uncertainty is a fundamental ingredient in quantum mechanics.

[@the_proteus_void]

@@karlschmied6218 I appreciate the sentiment, but I'm referring to a real life event, such as picking up my phone. I'm not referring to a theoretical event or any math involved in the quantum mechanical realm. Real life doesn't rely on quantum mechanics, which is only our perception that we desire to measure and comprehend. In real life, uncertainties exist in the probability field only up to the moment that I have actually picked up my phone. At that point, the probability field collapses and the uncertainty pertaining to the completion of that specific event ceases to exist. Other uncertainties still exist relating to a wide array of other possibilities, but it's not going to be the same uncertainty.

[@karlschmied6218]

@@the_proteus_void Ok now I know what you mean. But I could not see that in your first statement.

[@the_proteus_void]

@@karlschmied6218 Understood. Sometimes thoughts come out as incomplete statements. I'm glad I was able to clarify.

[@karlschmied6218]

@@the_proteus_void Thanks!

[@Votrae]

I really enjoyed this. Have to agree as well.. this is much more unsettling than I expected it to be

[@gaddafykibao3545]

Honestly this is a very informative video not only on the scientific side of things but in life like actual life ….I am a stock trader and the fractals part is spot on 😊

[@falconquest2068]

I was a little put off by his example of the stock market. He said, and I am paraphrasing, when a stock price changes, it causes people to buy or sell. Uh, the stock price changes BECAUSE people buy or sell. It's a market, stock prices don't change on their own. (although it may seem that way based on all of the shenanigans that go on in the background).

[@jonh8488]

AI has access to the same info as you do.

[@falconquest2068]

@@jonh8488 You are correct sir.

[@SolidSiren]

There is next to no science in this video.

[@nintendy]

There can only ever be predictability if there is 'limit'. We live in a world and universe that is limitless - therefore there can be no definite prediction. The trouble is with humans is we continually want and have a desire to know everything; we need acceptance that we cannot, and will not ever know everything. We refuse to accept this, because it frightens us.

[@raymondterrazas5702]

Theory’s are always interesting to learn about.

[@davidrandell2224]

“The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics.

[@mattcommons5392]

Our existence is everything, as well as nothing. In our 3rd universe there is an infinite amount of possibilities that have already existed, as well as nothing that has ever existed. This is just in the 3D existence that we're capable of understanding. When you get into the higher dimensions, like 4d, where time isn't a factor anymore, we'll start to understand more how everything is just everything.

[@Aangel452]

Nicely explained yet will always remain mind boggling. Great visuals!

[@durrcodurr]

4:16 the explanation is wrong, b/c computers usually cannot store decimal floating-point numbers *at all* . Instead, they use *binary* floating-point numbers, with digits after the point representing 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32, and so forth. A "double" is usually implemented as 64-bit IEEE binary floating-point number. This binary representation is completely deterministic, however b/c the format cannot precisely "store" the decimal digits specified after the decimal point, it's only an approximation (compare 1/2 vs 1/3, for instance -- try to write them down as binary floating-point as an exercise).

[@ozymandiasultor9480]

The flap of the butterfly "can" cause a tornado half a globe away IF that flap, the "wind" of that flap was in some very improbable manner reinforced with other winds caused by other things, and if that flap was the initial snowflake in the big snowball which would be the eventual tornado at the end. BUT, that is very unlikely to happen.

[@farrier2708]

19:10 "Perfect predictability is probably an illusion." 🤔 I think this says more about the inadequacy of our mathematical system than the assumed lack of order in the Universe. "As above, so below. As within, so without. As the Universe, so the soul." [Hermetic philosophy]

[@jimkirby1799]

Because of chaos, determinism can have anomalies arise because of the indeterminate consequences that may unfold. Determinism is still at the whim of probability.

[@Willy_Tepes]

And everyone ignores the will. Life is in many ways what you make it. There are no limits if you understand the people around you and what moves them. But this is not the average human. Some were born to change the world.

[@amorfati4096]

@@Willy_Tepes😂

[@jeytee289]

Interesting topic - perhaps a little bit too dramatically told - but absolutely gorgeous graphics - WOW ! Thumbs up !

[@londomolari5715]

Where do we get any randomness? The only thing I can think of is the decay of a neutron into a proton. What happens is well described, but why it happens is not. It seems spontaneous and random. Ultimately, it is an up quark turning into a down quark.

[@curiosorealidad8265]

Its because its a holograph universe, we are never allowed to go faster then the speed of load of the holograph=speed of light, we are not allowed to know why everything is posible but some things have less chance of happining, like crashing a car into a tree has a 99.9 % of more chance then uncrashing a car from a tree and the car undenting itself, this is posible but the chance of it happining is only a 00.1% and the chance of that low is that it wont happen in the whole life of the universe, the why is what makes it interesting, in the real reality out of this fake holographic life we built this game because the real reality is so boring with no changes,no caos,no death,no adrenaline, and we needed something that would make us feel fear,worry,love,etc. inmortalidad is more boring then we can remember, so we builted this holografic universe and started to play one life after another and here we are, of course you cant feel any emotions or it wont be fun if you remember that its a game right? So when we are in here playing we have no memory or its hard to access, to make it "fun" with emotions,just look at the ones in the lider places, if there was a real price to pay like hell when we die do you think they would go around starting wars,killing,etc., they know much more then we, one last thing to notice is the NPC los humanos sin alma o de relleno, estan por todas partes,familia,amigos,conocidos, estos su rostro se repite multiples veces por la poco varedad para la simulacion para elegir caracters, ellos los reconoces porque viven una vida sin cambios, no les importa nada, hasta parece que no sienten, solo trabajo-casa, no saben ni lo basico de como funciona la electricidad,technologia,etc., y cuando les explicas como te dicen sabelotodo o simplemente no te entienden,

[@curiosorealidad8265]

Why or how did a part of my F comment translate to F spanish?

[@smm2391]

​@@curiosorealidad8265there must be a glitch in that holopraphic universe..

[@smm2391]

Look.. it glitched a g in a p..

[@genepope7498]

I respectfully disagree that a grain of sand will always be the trigger for an avalanche. Particles that stick together for any reason can and do act as one larger particle. If you examine movies of landslides, the size of the pieces that begin the slide can vary, sometimes by large amounts, because the grains have "glued together" in a randomly sized larger "grain." The size of the starting grain is hard, if not impossible, to predict reliably. But because of this effect, it is not accurate to say that, in all cases, "a grain of sand will be the trigger."

[@petevenuti7355]

Don't forget chaotic attractors.

[@pygmalionsrobot1896]

Excellent video and discussion, thanks for making this. I just wanted to add one comment. At the 2 minute mark we see the random algorithm for generating a Sierpinski gasket. This is fantastic, but there is another method of generating this fractal which is purely deterministic - the Cantor Dust method. Start with a solid black triangle, and just start subtracting triangular holes out of it and continue to infinity. A purely deterministic process which yields the same exact thing. So no here is a QUESTION !!! Suppose you're walking down the street and you find one of these fractals laying on the ground. You pick it up and look at it. IS THERE Any Way that you can tell whether it was Generated by Method [1] ... or Method [2] ??? I'll wait.

[@wakeUPdummies]

All systems tend towards chaos, yet new systems emerge from the chaos.

[@lloydgarth1]

*Who are the mathematicians that contributed to fractals?* Pierre Fatou and Gaston Julia discovered fractals while studying complex mathematical systems at the turn of the 20th century. Considered mathematical monsters with unlimited complexity, fractals resisted linear analysis. Fractals were forgotten until Benoit Mandelbrot published his work in the 1960s.

[@WH40KHero]

An interesting observation about the chaos game: Due to the nature of the ruleset you immediately limit the area in which dots can be placed, removing a ton of potential randomness from the get-go. Id say in this case specifically its not too surprising if you end up with something orderly.

[@malakannagowli2350]

Probability and determinantal phenomenon make us to use our thinking power to exhaust completely. Likewise chaotic theory also. There is nothing like determinantal (that is sure to happen) phenomenon. As said in this video we like determinantal things , that is we want trains to run at fixed time, we need rains should stick to rainy season only. Like that we want our space activities should also be as expected. No problem any where correct take off correct journey and correct landing on moon or other planets and so on. We want everything determinantal ( that is accurate) but we have seen more failure then success in almost all cases. But probability can be relied. Trains may run in time or may not be in time. Our space activities can be accurate as planned or may end in failure. Predictability , we must hope but we should be ready to face failure as well. We can not predict weather, stock market, and many more cases as said in this video. There is quontom theory , which says the same thing that is nothing is predictable. So my view is we should be ready to sacrifice determinantal and accept probability in every aspect in physical world as well as behavioural aspects as well. We can not predict behaviour of any one continuously. Thanks for the video showing the various systems showing contradictory elements associated with each system like determinantal and probability.

[@thekingofmojacar5333]

Interesting topic, nice video, like always, thanks Fexl! 🙂 We living beings and our planet is in danger... We have to take care about us, animals and plants, about the entire planet! What we have done to our planet and all living creatures over the last 200 years can only result in bad karma. We have to change our attitude and learn to really love and respect, everyone and everything... 💞

[@greywolf271]

You got all that from ... wait ! ......Wow !

[@23Markthespark]

My first time taking shrooms was in a local state park. We took them early and watched the sun rise while we laid on some picnic benches underneath a pavilion. I looked down and noticed that there were small piles of confetti sprinkled all around, probably from a kids birthday party the day before. Then I began to notice something strange. My mind began to assemble the confetti into groups that resembled Mandlebrot sets. I can’t explain it, but to this day I believe that the throwing and settling of confetti is not random, but organized by nature because everything is in perfect order, whether hidden or visible.

[@Allyourheroswenttohell]

Every act is not random

[@dareese6778]

How do u define perfect? According to whom or what?

[@smm2391]

What your mind believes isn't necessarily true.. there was this lsd'd guy who thought he could fly.. gravity proved him wrong.

[@AT-ol2yj]

There was nothing “chaotic” about the chaos game at the beginning. You were following a set of rules that would obviously lead to the Sierpinski Triangle if you put some thought into it. The second game wasn’t deterministic as you were randomly removing a number, even though it was the first number, you’re still removing a random element. After watching the first two fails you lost me on this one.

[@MichaelRau-n3e]

Another Ai created channel?

[@eiwo323s]

Yes chaos usually flows on cycles where they form into fractals. It may have had a little quasi chaos but you can measure. The amount of chaos based on Lyapunov exponents.

[@jaydils9680]

❤❤❤❤ 💯

[@lucasbrelivet5238]

Do you mean that the number is random because the starting number was random?

[@luckyMePopUp]

It's not chaotic" because everything is in a wave, and the random comes into play, it all depends how you ride the wave .

[@Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time]

We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states, "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical 4πr² light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.

[@TerryConspiracy420]

There are no mistakes in this Universe. Not even one molecule can be out of place... anywhere.

[@roblox_bloxster]

actually there is one somehow....

[@wesexpress3343]

Neutrinos

[@TerryConspiracy420]

@@wesexpress3343 What about Neutrinos?

[@TerryConspiracy420]

New information, can change everything.

[@Giitzerland]

Nope, I can't go down this rabbit hole again. I can't even know what I don't know, so it's impossible to know if I know anything. I only know one thing, it's useless to fill in the gaps in my knowledge with "comfortmation", it's probably not a known word, but it should be, it should also be self explanatory. Good video, I think.

[@sandytrunks]

@0:08 "This may sound like a joke or something, but trust me..." Ah! You lost me there, mate. I don't even know you and you're asking me to trust you already?

[@Nonononono_Ohno]

And only 20 seconds later comes the first mistake, the butterfly effect isn't "probabilistic".

[@nftherula.]

faccs

[@donnievance1942]

@@Nonononono_Ohno Correct. The Butterfly Effect is simply a statement about the uncomputability of any complex, deterministic system beyond some relatively near horizon. However, the video makes that clear. You are constructing a strawman based on your own misunderstanding of what was being said.

[@Nonononono_Ohno]

@@donnievance1942 Your comment only shows that you have not been listening to, or understood, what is being said in the video. But I cannot blame you, with all that drivel. In the video we hear that "In the probabilistic mode, our universe unfolds with an element of chance. Small, seemingly insignificant events like the butterfly's wings cancascade into significant unpredictable consequences." This shows that whichever language model constructed this video erroneously "thinks" that the butterfly effect is "probabilistic mode". This is false.

[@Zariston]

Butterfly effect is deterministic. I have a better analogy, a bee landing on your nose can save your life. You are about to cross the road, green light indicates you can go but there is a car rushing about to hit you, out of nowhere a bee lands on your nose you step back and try to gently get rid of it. Someone could maybe start running faster and be hit by the car, but in this instance you "chose" to stop and gently chase it away, why did you chose to stop is deterministic as well. You could be bit by a bee in past as a child while trying to run away, and this is in your subconscious waiting for years to act on your "free decisions" when time comes...

[@Fenrisson]

0:02 - BRAZIL MENTIONED!!!

[@xxx_rotfd_xiii_xii3619]

OAKLEYS ON LIKE IM BRAZILIAN

[@xf_jaguar1162]

"In the realm of Particle Physics and Particle Chemistry, a captivating debate surrounds the fundamental constituents of matter, specifically focusing on the intricate building blocks of quarks, electrons, and gluons Can we unravel the profound essence of these particles and their interactions, which ultimately sculpt the very fabric of our universe? Delving into the heart of this discourse lies a fundamental question: What are the elemental particles that constitute quarks, electrons, and gluons, and how do their dynamic interplays delineate the fundamental architecture of matter? As we probe deeper into the subatomic realm, we unravel the mysterious dance of quarks, the elementary particles that make up protons and neutrons. Are they truly indivisible, or do they harbour deeper complexities awaiting discovery? Likewise, electrons, the enigmatic carriers of electric charge, stand as solitary entities, yet their behaviour perplexes even the most astute physicists. How do these particles, seemingly devoid of internal structure, exert such profound influence over the properties of matter? And then, there are gluons, the mediators of the strong force binding quarks together within the confines of atomic nuclei. How do these elusive particles govern the stability and structure of the very matter from which life itself emerges? In the grand tapestry of existence, proteins and sugars, the very building blocks of life, find their genesis in the intricate arrangements of these fundamental particles. Can we decipher the profound implications of these subatomic constituents on the macroscopic world, shedding light on the origins of life itself? Thus, the discourse unfolds, as we delve into the depths of particle physics, seeking to unravel the mysteries of existence through the lens of quarks, electrons, and gluons, and their profound implications for the nature of reality and the origins of life."

[@daxons2889]

What about if consicious mind observing makes paterns and shapes out of the Chaos.

[@jules6601]

Uhhhhhhhhhhh yeah it's called the observer effect. Schrödinger's cat and all that. None of this is new. Einstein ushered in the quantum physical age. He famously said "God does not play dice" believing in a static universe and an unsplittable atom. Then they split the atom and Hubble laid bare the redshift in galaxies moving apart at various rates "The Hubble Constant". Einstein relented, god does indeed play dice. Probablism and determinism coexist in a Newtonian and Einsteinian universe. Shocking new science c. 1915.

[@Pendragon981]

I think of the Chaos Theory as proof there is some form of intelligent design, just not in any way that we can fully understand. It truly takes humility and clarity to even hope to begin to understand even a fraction of the hidden designs in even the most simplistic of things.

[@ws775]

Open theism?

[@AssetH8ut2]

I wonder, would you get the same result, with the triangles, if done by hand? Or, what if you had a computer with the ability to process things outside the standard defined variables? Love the video.

[@jonathanspivey437]

Could you guarantee the exact same hand motions every time at every level? Chaos(or unpredictability) does not exist as absolute, but as relative. What seems like chaos are things that we dont understand enough to fully see the path from cause to effect. Our minds are limited, not infinite. So our understanding of anything will always be limited and their always be some chaos to it(relative to our limited understanding). However, to a being that infinite understanding(which could only be God, who is infinite) then there wouldnt be any chaos from His perspective because he would have infinity perspective and infinite understanding. The point is, some things seem uncertain to us, but thats because of our comprehension and awareness limitations, not because of the nature of the phenomena itself.

[@AssetH8ut2]

For free will to exist, an I believe it does, on some level anyway, the system has to exist as a set of probable outcomes, that only become defined as now moves forward. It would still chaos, just contained within specific bounds. I think we see things in much the same way, just providing my interpretation. @@jonathanspivey437

[@AssetH8ut2]

@@jonathanspivey437 I think free will is chaos, but god has computing power to allow for choice (sometimes) that exists within a set of outcomes that are acceptable.

[@richardpacker-ethier5302]

Douglas Adams was right, trying to figure out what is really going is mind-boggling remote. we may as well find something fun to do and keep our selves occupy in the mean time.

[@CoolHandLouis]

You made a mistake in the segment "Can you predict the future of our number?" It's totally predictable and there's no chaos about it. According to what was shown, multiplying by 10 and removing the integer portion, it creates a simple series: 0.123267203462345822542, 0.23267203462345822542, 0.3267203462345822542, ..., 0.542, 0.42, 0.2, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0. etc. I can predict that millionth iteration is still 0.0.

[@TheNewsicalProfessor]

That's exactly what i thought, keep multiply by 10, and remove the 1st number (ahead of the decimal point), and you hit zero pretty quickly. And after that it will always remain zero. How could this producer get this so wrong? Is this really 100% AI generated? If so, more fools will be created!

[@chickenmuffin]

Right? This made no sense. It made me think this whole video might have been made by AI.

[@billjohnson9472]

your calculation appears to have precision rounding. the answer may differ with different levels of rounding.

[@XtreeM_FaiL]

American AI. Can't understand decimal system.

[@1OnlyOneOnlyOne1]

Very interesting. Makes me think there is no such thing as chance or random. Every single moment is a part of a huge tapestry.

[@johnstones66]

This stuff is older than I am and I'm old. Scientists have been talking about it the whole time.

[@RaniVeluNachar-kx4lu]

Or reading a persons cryptic self description on a website that I never ever went on before, then communicating with the owner of that description and developing a conversation and ultimately going to her country and marrying her and now she is a senior VP in Family Wealth and Planning but before she was a Protocol and Public Relations officer in her own country making $100 a month. Just because she was bored and went on line and left a little description about herself, and I went there and everything changed. Just because of one event creating an opportunity, even as remote as it was, to have that "message in a bottle" read by somebody that she would have never met otherwise from a place 6000 miles away from where she lived.

[@DeweyKiller]

Where's the "Don't recommend this Channel" when ya need it ?

[@aman7525]

As soon as I heard the AI voice and saw this comment. 🏃🏾💨

[@FatFilipinoUK]

The emerging image of the Sierpinski Triangle reminds me of the double-slit experiment where a single photon is fired through the slits one at a time to create a pattern of light and dark bands.

[@Trottelheimer]

Click bait title - not watching this one.

[@Allyourheroswenttohell]

You should. I've always believed this. I never knew it had a name. It just made sense to me.

[@Allyourheroswenttohell]

Free will is imaginary.

[@Private-wj4nd]

Why? It’s really interesting! ❤

[@dee_w784]

Despite the clickbait title it is very good

[@ianyeager2893]

Exciting visual stimuli coupled with vocal delivery suggesting a tense suspense yarn almost make me fail to notice extremely poor logical continuity and flow. After seven minutes plus I've little idea what it's about. I think it's cotton candy crap, electronic monosodium glutamate, possibly composed by nonhuman. Kindly refund my wasted time

[@oopsadaze]

The film 'GROUNDHOG DAY' with Bill Murray is a good place to start to study chaos theory. The Pattern repeated is Life, His comment is that he is not THE GOD, but a god, and maybe God has just been around so long, he knows everything. Bill's character does the work and tries harder to put it to a benefit, in other words love is answer.🦋

[@GtommyT]

That wasn't chaos. Try that point program again but this time your starting and ending points are random each time. That would be chaos. But as soon as you apply rules, you're no longer in chaos. The universe is chaos until observed because observation creates boundaries and rules for how things are/should be based on inmate bias, understanding, and capabilities of that observer. It's why the light slit experiment works and why quanta appear in multiple states until observed. Because of OUR limitations we can't observe the universe in it's true state so we grab at patterns to form boundaries for our experience which eventually appear as universal laws and facts. It stems from the fact that everything is the same one thing, and all of time is instantaneous (non-existent)

[@Nonononono_Ohno]

That the "triangle magic" isn't chaos, yes, agreed. But the rest is a *very* esoteric view, to say the least.

[@awaben]

@@Nonononono_Ohno It may be a little esoteric (what theory of the nature of reality isn't?) but it's coherent and quite intellectually pleasing. I say thanks to @GtommyT for taking the time to put that one out there. We are seeking greater understanding and enlightenment, after all, or we're doing nothing at all.

[@Nonononono_Ohno]

@@awaben You have a strange view of coherence. If you really seek understanding, you might better want to consult a good physics textbook, instead of reading completely misunderstood and plain wrong comments under useless videos. As a starting point, I'd like to recommend the Feynman lectures.

[@awaben]

@@Nonononono_Ohno I hadn't come on here for an argument. But I'm happy to give you a retort: You watched the same "useless" video I did, you responded to the same comment I did, you then proceeded to attempt to denigrate my having done so. Presumably you doing the same should be applauded. Tell me, how's that superiority complex working out for you? Seems like a timely moment to bust out a bit of Robert Burns: "O wad some Power the giftie gie us To see oursels as ithers see us! It wad frae mony a blunder free us, An’ foolish notion" Bye, bye now.

[@Nonononono_Ohno]

​@@awaben I'm sorry that I've hurt your feelings. However, videos like this one, and the above comment aren't doing science any favor. There are very good reasons for having a concept of passing time in physics. At first glance drivel like 'time does not exist', or 'the universe is chaos until observed' may seem very deep and enigmatic and therefore appealing to some people, but in fact it's just plain wrong. Subsequently it leads to even more completely wrong notions, like chaos being the reason for what we observe in the double slit experiment, or being the reason for the existence of quantum states. Science students who, when learning, come across this kind of nonsense often lose valuable time, which is why I occasionally point it out as what it really is. I hope that makes sense to you, and maybe it lets you understand my reaction to your comment a bit better.

[@erikolsen1333]

Chaos is small changes in initial conditions yield to larger changes later on…. However calculus measures the smoothness of a system the other side of that coin would be like the roughness of the system ie the fractality… in a chaotic system there are always patterns proven within in it… You see the physics still applies but we don’t have a hope in capturing every location and vector of an atom in a system. If could calculate we would have amazingly accurate forecasts… But calculating every atoms interactions in a storm would be mind boggling but we know the patter is quite real when a funnel cloud forms or it starts to rain.

[@PTEC3D]

In the Chaos Game 3 dot - the rule to get the (red, normal orientation) Sierpinski triangles is as stated - but what if you wanted to plot the white (inverted) triangles instead? What ruleset would plot those? Hmmmmm.....

[@dennishaladyn8205]

The Sierpinski triangle represents a pattern of eternal triangles within triangles.

[@pesasafi]

Same rules. You just start from some point, that is white. For example in the middle area of the triangle. The rule just maps the "current point" of the whole triangle to a corresponding point in one of the ½ size triangles in each corners of the big triangle. With same color. And then you map that point and the next one etc. Randomness just decides the drawing order of the points.

[@AllenDamiani]

Glad I read a couple comments before watching the video. Thanks.

[@JMazzaTaz]

If you ever see a turtle on top of a fence post, it’s a safe bet that it didn’t get there by itself. The more you know….

[@Just_A_Kid5693]

I don’t get it

[@Just_A_Kid5693]

Me:*moves chair* The theory: the world will end

[@Shattered_Instance]

I go outside with butterfly wings on every morning and flap my wings for hours. Neighbors are convinced I am to blame for everything.

[@Shattered_Instance]

Someone liked my comment... Clearly the wings are working.

[@glenfoxh]

Then stop it.

[@SteveYates-uo4dq]

Chaos theory is the most likely of theories because everything is subject to change at any point in time and unpredictable because everyone changes their minds and behaviour great video show more I will be looking forward to them

[@Steven-ff4wl]

Click bait.

[@stevenmoore3480]

it's basically all we've got now

[@mrx1278]

How so Stev?

[@stevenmoore3480]

@@mrx1278 you cannot sell anything now without lying about what it is you are actually going to get for your time or money...

[@mrx1278]

@@stevenmoore3480 oh....

[@Steven-ff4wl]

@@mrx1278 It's nonsense.

[@briankleinschmidt3664]

They don't discuss it because it's not a thing. While everything is connected if you back far enough, there is a point were the connection is negligible - i.e. the pull of Jupiter's gravity on your body is just not measurable - it doesn't effect your momentum. The butterfly flap cannot override all the other factors that cause or prevent a weather event.

[@Kreshura-tm5rb]

0:01 brazil mentioned

[@harshalsharma19]

⚽️ 🏟 🕺🕺

[@Kreshura-tm5rb]

@@harshalsharma19 aeeee, aqui é brasil!!!

[@08SB80]

It seems a multiverse could form from out of this, “Chaos theory.” Any hypothetical observers of a supposed multiverse, would’ve anticipated such chaos. If there ever were a particular goal of “God,” the random role of the dice is bound to repeat until it’s reached. The same concept applies to evolution. The randomly rolled dice of chaos, choosing the traits best kept through deviated mutations. Who knows? Chaotic deviations may form and serve purpose, unbeknownst to the hypothetical overseers of this supposed multiverse.

[@I_am_a_human_not_a_commodity]

Bad spam bot. Get outta here.

[@MrBallenHiddenTruths]

???? What

[@DStrayCat69]

WOW!!! Fantastic lecture 🙂 I love it.