The Pentax K3 MKIII Monochrome

Рет қаралды 2,712

GCTV

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер

@doghouse010 3 ай бұрын

i like your style of reviewing! Subscribed!

@danvander-ark1309 5 ай бұрын

Love this video! And love your humor!

@bittertruth6175 6 ай бұрын

Excellent Review. Covering all key features precisely and concisely. Hoping your another in-depth review of K3 monochrome.

@bobforce565 9 ай бұрын

One of the best camera reviews, great job !

@GroveCameraTV 9 ай бұрын

Ha you are too kind, I have acquired a Sony a7c for the next video so my video and audio should be a little better now.

@Robert-ko6wr 5 ай бұрын

In a word, refreshing. You call it as you see it. Who can complain about that? I'm intrigued but not enough to buy the Pentax Monochrome. I can do monochrome with my Nikon and I do. I started in the early '70's with B&W film. Now I do digital. What I want is an achromatic full frame DSLR. With everybody going mirrorless think that will happen? No it will not. Not talking about Phase One. The cost will always be a barrier for me. Maybe your point about filters with monochrome is something I should more closely examine. So my take away is I learned a little somethin-something therefore this is a good video. As for the technical difficulties? Loved how you handled them. Thanks.

@scottmfulton 8 ай бұрын

Great review! I can't wait to try it. Couldn't agree more that this sensor in the GRiii seems like a no brainer. Let me know if you'd like to take the GFX100s for a spin, I'd love to see that review! You could make prints of your favorite size, but in feet instead of inches😂

@DC-Cyprus 8 ай бұрын

Great review. Thank you.

@dukenukem5768 7 ай бұрын

@3:15 : The Nikon F, F2 and F3 and the earlier Canon F1 had off-centred flash shoes too. It was a compromise to avoid putting it on the removable pentaprism and it was not a good arrangement. Later cameras (F4 etc) put it on the pentaprism.

@RayLombardi 4 ай бұрын

Something to keep in mind and no one mentions, the lenses from time gone by can be used, but this camera has a crop sensor, so it is almost impossible to find a wide angle lens. Want a 24mm? Want a 35mm? Not gonna find them in the old lenses, they were designed for 35mm format, so all the focal lengths have to be multiplied by 1.5x(as you mentioned, thanks). Apart form that, the camera is simply incredible! Could Pentax release a full frame version please? And, could other manufacturers follow suit please? Not many people can afford a several thousand pound/dollar/yen Leica set up. Thanks!

@l.nauwelaerts195 8 ай бұрын

Nice review. I do not notice the AF-C hit & miss on the regular k-3 iii, though. It’s actually pretty consistent and performs very well. Looking forward to your next review.

@kitchilpus3651 8 ай бұрын

Great review, already a while I am planning to buy monochrome camera, was looking to Leica so far. Have 2 Leica cameras , but not monochrome, Bought second hand. The more I read about this Pentax the more I start to change my mind, yes it’s bigger and more bulky than Leica, I own already 2 Pentax cameras , and some Pentax lenses. Still not made my mind up, my goal is to cut the rope this summer and choose. Get a push forwards after saw this review, 😊😊

@matthewp7428 7 ай бұрын

Pentax shooter here, and it's great to see people trying these cameras out. The firmware updating is finicky, and I don't do it that often so I find myself looking up exactly how to do it almost every time even though I've had mine for 4 years. It sounds like you're shooting with some of the DA limited lenses. I have the full frame DFA limited lenses for my K-1 and they're also screw drive. I despise the screw drive 😂 so I just manually focus those lenses for the most part. It is however important to point out that Pentax does sell a variety of modern lenses with focusing motors built into the lenses as well. Quiet and tend to focus better, but these still aren't sonys in that aspect. Subscribed 👍

@ronbokje6213 6 ай бұрын

I have the Pentax K1 markII because I have so many lenses, and don't want to chance them when I went to digital. and it all works very good. its a fun brand

@TyRonKitzeRow 9 ай бұрын

I Just purchased a Leica m262. You are right about blowing out the highlights in the Leica’s. It is a bit more challenging but i love their range finders. Nice video

@GroveCameraTV 9 ай бұрын

Thank you, enjoy your M240. it will be a sad day when i sell the one in the shop.

@stephanedubarry8624 3 ай бұрын

Anyway Ido like the style and mood of this video as well

@toddm6999 4 ай бұрын

Good 👍

@andig4780 8 ай бұрын

Good review. Thanks …

@dbkfrogkaty1 8 ай бұрын

Now that's a nice review. I'm a Pentax shooter. I shot B&W with my old film cameras but now I use the K-5II. I might consider the K-3 III at some point. But the monochrome? Not sure on that yet.

@stephanedubarry8624 3 ай бұрын

Increasing ISO and closing the aperture allow easy zone focusing for acceptable sharp images but when you need sharp images AND shallow deaph of field zone focusing rarely works

@jimzielinski946 8 ай бұрын

Thanks for the tip on TAV mode. (I know, read the manual!). I have this camera, maybe for the same reason you like it - I shot lots of b&w in the film era. The story I heard about the B&W sensor was that Sony (i think?) had an excess of them (APS-C) which may have convinced Ricoh to take a chance. Honestly, if they put that small sensor into a K1 body, i wouldn't have liked it. I dont think they would have taken a chance on a full frame B&W sensor because of cost.

@MichaelRusso 4 ай бұрын

The screw drive does the job but the newer lenses remedy that. Wide angle lenses are not a big issue. If you shoot manual, it does not matter ;)

@onlinetraderucom 6 ай бұрын

Hello! you don't know what video functions are in the camera? Is there an additional sensor crop when shooting video? what file format? is there jelly when filming?

@TheLocalredhead 5 ай бұрын

Love my K3III. It's a workhorse.

@Digibeatle09 3 ай бұрын

Good video - thanks - assuming one has taken a really good picture with this camera (which is down - I suppose - to the photographer) and one wants say a “10 x 8” print of it - or the equivalent standard size in digital printing - isn’t there a “cost problem” ? I could get a really top quality print with my relatively cheap darkroom/enlarger set - up - with digital files/ digital printing my understanding is that you have to pay top dollar for a home printer that will deliver comparable quality to a “wet” B & W print. There are specialist companies - I believe - that you can transmit your file to and which will use state of art printing facilities to produce, digitally, a really impressive print - but that does come at a cost also.