The Rejected Qiraat (القراءات الشاذة‎) || Ustadh Abdulrahman Hassan || AMAU

Sign up at www.amauathome.com/ to stay up to date with all of our courses.
The Preserved Book is a short course brought to you by Al Madrasatu Al Umariyyah. Amidst the many false doubts that are thrown around about the religion of Islam, the preservation of The Qur’an is always a favourite for the non-Muslim orientalists. Here at Al Madrasatu Al Umariyyah, we’ve taken the time out to record a detailed course that tackles this topic head on. Join us on this journey as we explore exactly how our noble Book has been preserved word for word, letter by letter. Bring your pen and paper and get ready to defend the religion of Islam!
You can also find us on:
Instagram: / amauofficial
KZbin: / almadrasatualumariyyah
Twitter: / amau2525
BarakAllahu feekum.
#AMAU #QuranPreservation #AbdulrahmanHassan

[@AlMiftahulIslam]

🔰Lesson 10: The Rejected Qira'at 📋In this lesson Ustadh talks about five points on the Rejected Qira'at 📑Firstly, the definition of the Rejected Qira'at -Meaning in the Arabic language(00:55) -Definition to the Scholars(02:05) To the scholars, every Qira'at that lacks one of the Pillars of an accepted Qira'at is a Rejected one. (02:55)- The pillars of an accepted Qira'at 🎯How many accepted Qira'at are there? (04:05) Ans: Only Ten Qira'at fulfills all three conditions. So there are only Ten Qira'at that are accepted. (05:10)- The Rejected Qira'ats are better than the Fabricated ones. As they could have been from the Prophet(sallallahu 'alaihi wa sallam) but is abrogated. 👈 📑The second point 🎯When did the concept of accepted and rejected Qira'at come?(06:55) Ans: There are two views regarding that. Some say that it came during the lifetime of the Prophet(sallallahu 'alaihi wa sallam)(07:09) On the other hand, some scholars say that it came during the Khilafah of Uthman(may Allah be pleased with him)(8:25) 📑The third point is about using the rejected Qira'ats as a proof.(09:27) 🎯Can we read or recite the rejected Qira'ats?(09:50) Ans: There are three views. 📋A small number of scholars say that it is permissible.(10:10) 📋The majority of the scholars say that it is not permissible.(10:40) (11:30)- Two interesting stories on reading the rejected Qira'ats 📋The third view is quite funny(13:30) However, the second view is the more correct and majority of the scholars accepted this view. 🎯Can you act upon the rejected Qira'ats?(15:00) Ans: There are two views regarding it. 📋First view is that you can act upon it and even rulings can be taken from it. It is the view of majority of the scholars. (16:10)- Two examples 📋The second opinion is that you can't act upon it or take rulings from it.(17:50) 📑Fourth point 🎯What are the most prominent rejected Qira'ats?(19:09) Ans: They are divided into two groups. 📋The first group that consists of four Qira'ats(20:10) 📋The second group(20:48) 📑The fifth point: some examples(21:30) 💎We must(the people involved in dawah) study the rejected Qira'ats to tacle the Missionaries and the likes. Jazhakallahu khair ❤

[@albiboi123]

May Allah reward you immensely for posting your notes and time stamps on these videos, very helpful

[@shakeerahmed77]

Baraka Allahu feekum. Jazak Allahu khairann. Shaikh Abdur Rahman my humble request is that you please make pdf notes of all these series. Both in English and Arabic so that we cab benefit more and memorise it.

[@shokzz1532]

Read the books of the scholars on this topic

[@purplerain2205]

MashaAllah this series on Qirat & Ahruf has been sensational, brilliant! So beneficial so valuable!

[@Qazi3344]

ustadh abdurrahman next series should be hujiyat of hadith and ijma

[@themansami]

As for hadith, I think he did that in the playlist called history of the compilation of hadeeth

[@user-dx5ie3uv8m]

Jazak Allahu khayr

[@TheGunner197]

اللهم بارك The ustadh for picking this topic. جزاك اللهُ خيرًا

[@Wakobear.]

جزاك الله خيرًا

[@xrcxrc2643]

You are a true scholar….. Masha allah

[@iidsalah1989]

Jizaaka'Allaahu Khayran Khatiira ...

[@mjzeb]

JazakAllah Khayr Sheikh. I don’t know where else to find such detailed explanations. It’s really helpful.

[@kugisakinobara3589]

Can you make a video on Why Allah chose some qirra of the recitations to be abrogated through the al ardh al akhira and the Muttawatir chain and why did he leave others?

[@soufyan454]

Next video on those who believe in qiraa-bil-maana

[@makkahcadey]

They are not attcking the Qur'aan nor the Salaf they are attacking the Messenger of Allah becouse they deny him. Verily the Prophet alayhi salaatu wa salaam conveyed the Message as it was and CLEAR. Verily Allah spoke the TRUTH when He said He will preserve the Qur'aan. And blessed were those who conveyed it and preserved it to us. And we must do so too(in'Sha'Allah). We know what human speech is and this Qur'aan has NO human speech in it despite it being in the human language in particular the Arabic. When you read it, unlike any other human book you can easily spot the difference if it contained anywords other than the One who sent it, Allah Ta'ala. It's style, it's dignity in Words, it's respect when addressing, it's orders, it's guidance, it's eloquence, it's nobility, and such beautiful descriptions don't stop there. It can be easily spotted if it had any other words other than Allah's. Even, the choice of when Allah mentions His names or attributes in a verse, it befits the whole chapter and verse or relaying of what is before it after it, surely such a flow is NOT broken. It's like a chain, if it is cut or knotted you can see and it is continuous without any mistak or contradiction yet It can not be compared to anything for it is uncreated IT IS purely the speach of Allah. The kufaar, know it well, yet they befool their ignorant followers with this. But, it is a good becouse many learn, increase their certainty in the Deen and in particular their love and certainty for the Qur'aan, and surely we love the Salaf even more than before. It is ironic in regards to their slander(intend to hinder but makes our shuyukh like this sheikh uncover the gems of this subject) but yet brought out much good. Miraculous becouse not only one way and style was preserved but 7 modes as well as 10 ways of recitation was preserved(and that is to my limited knowledge). What book can claim such preservation. Subhanah Allah a miracle in it's entirety. They couldn't even preserve the one book the Injeel, and they want to slander a book in the hearts of billions(from it's beginning till now), in 7 Ahruuf and 10 Qira'aat. La hawla wa la quwata ila billah. May Allah Ta'ala reward you for your part in preserving our Qur'aan abundantly. One request is, a mp3 format and pdf so that we can benefit in the future if we forget anything and pass it down. Please.

[@afreenafreen6390]

Mashallah ! Jazakallah khair!

[@user-vk1tm1xl8b]

لَا حَوْلَ وَلَا قُوَّةَ إِلَّا بِٱللَّٰ

[@gavcnr]

As Salaam Alaykum, can anyone help me out with some information? who is being referred to when He (Ustadh Abdulrahman Hassan) sometimes mentions "The poet said". BTW not mentioned in this lesson, Wa Jazak Allahu Khairann.

[@themansami]

He doesn't always mean the same poet when he says "the poet said". He most likely says that because the poet who said/wrote that verse is unknown, or he can't remeber his name etc. A lot of poetry, especially fron before islam, is from unknown authors

[@imranduka]

If some scholars say we can read the qiraat as-shadhaah, then isn’t that treating them as not rejected, because we can use it for salah and everything else, so we’re basically treating it as the quran

[@erollkadrija820]

How do we know if they r in line with the Ithmanic masahif? Do we habe those five manuscripts actually? If yes, where are they?

[@stevenv6463]

What does he mean when he says one of the Uthmanic mushafs? I understood that there is only one mushaf from Uthman and all 10 qiraat agree with this one. Do you mean one of the seven sent out that were identical? جزاك الله خيرا for the lecture. It is quite comprehensive and helpful for conversations with non Muslims who want to bring up these issues.

[@karimdaghmash7853]

There were 5 uthmani mushafs One sent to kufa, mecca, Medina, sham, and basra They had the base of the quraish dialect and their only differences were the addition and omission of words Ex. From under which rivers flow And Under which rivers flow The addition and omission don't change the meaning rather it makes emphasis The visual differences are only with the omission and addition of words like these Also the mushafs didn't have dots to encompass all of the accents and pronunciations present and verbal conjugations and the alif that want written (like maalik and melik)

[@zacharia7535]

I have a question. You devide the qiraat al-shadah into two groups and you mentioned 4 and 7 qaari names. You didn't mention Ubay ibn Ka'ab qiraa'at when you were mentioned the names of the qaari but you uses him as example. Why is that? Wasn't Ubay Ibnu Ka'ab qiraa'a part of alqiraat Al-shaadah?

[@mra8554]

Rejected Qira'aat is in my vieuw not correctly translated brother. I propose that you think in the direction of 'abberant' of 'deviating'. Even 'opposing' is not realy precise. Wallaahu A'lam.

[@moba1209]

21:30

[@omaral.manaseer7033]

التعليق على قراءات تحريف كلام الله موجود على الرد

[@omaral.manaseer7033]

قُرءانٌ وقراءات وتحريفٌ وتعقيدات ، وتشويهٌ وشذوذ وتعجيبٌ وإعوجاجات... وما أجرأهم على الله وعلى رسول الله ، وما أجرأهم على الإفتراء على رسول الله بنسبة قراءاتهم لتحريف وحي الله لرسول الله وبأنها عنهُ مُتواترات ، لا نظن بأن هُناك أُمة طعنت في كتاب ربها وتفننت وعمدت إلى تحريفه وتشويهه وإيجاد العوج فيه ، أو إتهامه بالتحريف كما فعلت أمة المُسلمين ، وما قرأ بشرٌ كتاباً بقراءات كما قرأه من بدلوا وغيروا دين الله بعد رحيل رسول الله ، وكُلٌ يقرأ على هواهُ ، وكما هي ليلى كُلٌ يُغني على ليلاه ، بقراءاتٍ كُبرى وصُغرى ، وقالوا عن غالبيتهن شاذات ، فلمى لا يكون كُلهن إلا واحدةٌ شاذات ، فهل تم قراءة التوراة والإنجيل على قراءات ، وحتى وهل المُعلقاتُ على أحرفٍ وقراءات ، فبالقراءات أوجدوا في كتاب الله التحريف والباطل والتعقيدات والصعوبات، والاضطرابٌ وإيجاد الإختلافات والعوج والتشويهات ، ولم يُنزل الله وحيه وكلامه الخاتم للعرب ولا لقبائلهم ولا بلسان لهجات ، ولا هو قُرءان نزل بلهجاتٍ ولا بلغات ولا بلكنات ، وإن سمح رسول الله لمن لسانه ليس على لسان قُريش ولسان رسول الله بأن يقرأ على لسانه ، وليس هو سماحُ ديمومةٍ بل هو سماحُ تيسير وتسهيلات ، حتى أستقامت ألسنتهم على لسان كتاب الله ، ولا هو قرءان للعرب ولقبائلهم وللهجاتهم وللغاتهم وألفاظهم ، كما يدعي من يفترون على الله وعلى كتابه ورسوله الكذب ، ولا هو قرءان حمزة وخلاد وخلف أو قالون الأصم الأطرش الأطرم ولا هو قرءان قنبل ونافع وورش وعامر وغيرهم ، ممن أبتدعوا تلك القراءات ، ودققوا كم هو ضياعهم وتوهانهم وزوغانهم ، فبجريمة القراءات تم التحريف والتشويه واللعب واللهو بكلام الله ، والتعقيدُ لتلاوة ولقراءة كتاب الله وتشويهه ، وجعله لعبٌ ومهزلة وسُخريةً وسخرةٌ في القراءات ، ولبئس العلم علمهم ، علم القراءات ، لأن من بدل أو زاد أو أنقص أو قلب أي حرف من كلام الله ، وحتى تغيير تشكيل ، فقد حرف كلام الله ، ومن حرف كلام الله فقد كفربالله وهو كافر ومُشرك بالله خارجٌ من ملة دين الله ، ولا دحض ولا رد وراد لقراءاتهم ولعلمهم المشؤوم ، إلا كلام الله بأنه ما يسر وحيه وكلامه الخاتم إلا بلسان رسول الله ، هذا العلم الذي تم به التجرأ والإعتداء على كلام الله ووحيه الخاتم ، والذي هو الوجه الثاني لجريمة وطعنة النسخ والناسخ والمنسوخ المسمومة ، وبأن كُل ما يقولون به وما يستدلون به هي لروايات موضوعة ومكذوبة ، فلا لسان لعمرإبن الخطاب ولهشام إبن حكيم إلا حرفٌ ولسانٌ واحد هو حرف ولسان رسول الله ، لأنهما قُرشيان كرسول الله ، فكيف يُتهمُ رسول الله بأنهُ علمهم حروفٌ كثيرات ، والرد عليهم وعلى علمهم وعلى قراءاتهم ، هو من الله والله هو الذي يرد ضلالتهم هذه ، عندما قال وهو الأصدق قيلاً والأحسنُ حديثاً والأصدقُ من قراءاتهم ورواياتهم ، بآية واحدة من ضمن الكثير من الآيات تٌبطل قراءاتهم ، حيث يقول الحق} فَإِنَّمَا يَسَّرْنَاهُ بِلِسَانِكَ لَعَلَّهُمْ يَتَذَكَّرُونَ{ سورة الدُخان 58.... {فَإِنَّمَا يَسَّرْنَاهُ بِلِسَانِكَ لِتُبَشِّرَ بِهِ الْمُتَّقِينَ وَتُنذِرَ بِهِ قَوْماً لُّدّاً }مريم97..... ولم يكُن لرسول الله إلا لسان وحرف واحد ووجه واحد للقراءة وللكلام ، وأبوعبد الرحمن السُلمي رضوان الله عليه ، أكد بأن قراءة حفصٍ عن عاصم ، والتي يقرأ بها الآن ما يُقارب من مليار700 مليون مُسلم ، هي القراءة المُتواترة الوحيدة عن رسول الله ، والتي توافق الرسم العثماني ، والتي تكفل الله بها بحفظ وحيه في الصدور وكذلك في السطور ، وحتى العرب وقبائلهم فلا لسان ولا حرف لهم إلا اللسان العربي المُبين ، الذي هو حرف ووجه واحد للكلام فقط ، ، أما تلك الوجوه وتلك القراءات فهي من بدع ومذاهب من أوجدها ، فخالف بها كُل واحد منهم غيره ، فزادوا حروف وأنقصوا حروف وقلبوا حروف بل ولعبوا بكلام الله وباالكلمات ، وهي من ضلالتهم وتجرأهم على كتاب الله ، كما هي ضلالتهم وتجرأهم على الله بالنسخ والناسخ والمنسوخ ..... قال القاضي عياض عليه رحمة الله في كتابه "الشفا في بيان حقوق المصطفى "... وأن من نقص من كتاب الله حرفاً قاصداً لذلك ، أو بدله بحرف آخر مكانه ، أو زاد فيه حرفاً مما لم يشتمل عليه المصحف الذي وقع الإجماع عليه ، وأجمع على أنه ليس من القرآن عامداً لكل هذا أنه كافر.... الشفا" (2/ 304-305) ، وينظر : "التقرير والتحبير" لابن أمير الحاج (2/ 215( ..... ....8/8/2020.إطلع على ما هو على هذه الروابط....وفي أولها حتى قرأوا كلمة الله صراط...ظراط. ............... kzbin.info/www/bejne/larJoIigiLybj7c ................ kzbin.info/www/bejne/eKWmq6ukjZakeas ..................... ...kzbin.info/www/bejne/nXKvoYOLgrCKmbs

[@ahmadar1278]

You say that these 10 Qiraat is in line with the Uthmanic mushaf. How do we know if they are in line when we don't have this complete and perfectly preserved mushaf from Uthman? Many of the earliest Qur'an manuscripts we have is not Uthmanic. And those we have that have the Rasm Al-Uthmani is not from the 7th century when Uthman send those copies to the different places. So the question is: How can we with certainty show and prove that the Quranic manuscript and the Qiraat that exist today is complete and unchanged if we do not have the orginal/originals mushaf/masahif from Uthman?

[@khalidabdikarim2069]

Who is says that aren't 7 century manuscripts? Check this website for 7 century manuscripts. www.islamic-awareness.org/quran/text/mss/ And by the way you don't need manuscript from the time of Uthmaan to proof that because we have multiple chains that go back to the prophet ( sallaahu calayhi wasalaam).

[@ahmadar1278]

@Siliconen This narrative is well-known but how can you prove this without a complete and unchanged Quranic manuscript from Uthman?

[@ahmadar1278]

@@khalidabdikarim2069 There are 7th century manuscripts. But do we have one of the original in its complete and unchanged form? If not we cant use this claim for the preservation of the Qur'an. In this page you share they mention sanaa manuscripts. But this manuscript have two layers: The lower layer that is washed/erased can be dated from the 7th century. But this do not match the quran we use Today (Rasm Al-uthmani). The upper layer Better match the Qur'an Word by word but it was written in later time. They Also mention Topaki manuscript but is written almost 100 year after uthman and cannot be one of the Qur'an uthman send out

[@themansami]

You have to remember that the preservation of thr Qur'an is first and foremost through speech, as it is taught, memorised and then passed on. Writtern down masaahif are a secondary means of preservation. If there are millions of people reading the same Qur'an, and there are thousands of chains of narrations going all the way back to Allah, even in our modern day, and millions of copies of the original uthmani mushaf which we have, all of this cannot be made up, and it's impossible for there to be some elaborate ruse in which the quran was changed from what it was at the time of uthman.

[@themansami]

@@ahmadar1278 As for the San'aa manuscript, then the reason the lower layer was rubbed off was exactly because it was different to the actual Qur'an. It makes far more sense for a scribe to write down some ayaat wrong than for it to be right, and hence all of the thousands of people which were reading and memorising the Qur'an even at that time to all be wrong. That's why Allah says in the Qur'an بل هي آيات بيّنات في صدور الذين أوتوا العلم (Rather it is clear ayaat in the chests of those who have been given knowledge), indicating that the Qur'an is preserved through memorisation. That is also one of the reasons that the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم was taught the Qur'an by jibreel word by word rather than it being put directly in his heart, or given to him in written form.

[@omaral.manaseer7033]

قُرءانٌ وقراءات وتحريفٌ وتعقيدات ، فبالقراءات أوجدوا في كتاب الله التحريف والباطل والتعقيدات، والاضطرابٌ وإيجاد االإختلافات والتشويهات ، ولم يُنزل الله وحيه بلهجاتٍ ولا بلغات ، وإن سمح رسول الله لمن لسانه ليس على لسان قُريش ولسان رسول الله بأن يقرأ على لسانه ، وليس هو سماحُ ديمومةٍ بل هو سماحُ تيسير وتسهيلات ، ولا هو قرءان للعرب ولقبائلهم وللهجاتهم وللغاتهم وألفاظهم ، كما يدعي من يفترون على الله وعلى كتابه ورسوله الكذب ، ولا هو قرءان حمزة وخلاد وخلف أو قالون ولا هو قرءان قنبل ونافع وورش وعامر وغيرهم ممن أبتدعوا تلك القراءات ، ودققوا كم هو ضياعهم وتوهانهم وزوغانهم ، فبجريمة القراءات تم التحريف والتشويه واللعب واللهو بكلام الله ، والتعقيدُ لتلاوة ولقراءة كتاب الله وتشويهه ، وجعله مهزلة وسُخريةً في قراءاتهم ، ولبئس العلم علمهم ، لأن من بدل أو زاد أو أنقص أو قلب أي حرف من كلام الله ، وحتى تغيير تشكيل ، فقد حرف كلام الله ، ومن حرف كلام الله فقد كفربالله وهو كافر ومُشرك بالله، ولا دحض ولا رد لقراءاتهم ولعلمهم المشؤوم ، الذي تم به التجرأ والإعتداء على كلام الله ووحيه الخاتم ، والذي هو الوجه الثاني لجريمة وطعنة النسخ والناسخ والمنسوخ المسمومة ، وبأن كُل ما يقولون به وما يستدلون به هي لروايات موضوعة أو فهمٍ خاطئ لها ، بأن كلام الله أُنزل على سبعة أحرف ، فلا لسان لعمرإبن الخطاب ولهشام إبن حكيم إلا حرفٌ واحد هو حرف رسول الله ، لأنهما قُرشيان كرسول الله ، والرد عليهم وعلى علمهم وعلى قراءاتهم ، هو من الله والله هو الذي يرد ضلالتهم هذه ، عندما قال وهو الأصدق قيلاً وحديثاً والأصدقُ من قراءاتهم ورواياتهم ، بآية واحدة من ضمن الكثير من الآيات ، حيث يقول} فَإِنَّمَا يَسَّرْنَاهُ بِلِسَانِكَ لَعَلَّهُمْ يَتَذَكَّرُونَ{ سورة الدُخان 58 ، ولم يكُن لرسول الله إلا لسان وحرف واحد ووجه واحد للقراءة ، وأبوعبد الرحمن السُلمي أكد بأن قراءة حفصٍ عن عاصم ، هي القراءة المُتواترة الوحيدة عن رسول الله ، والتي توافق الرسم العثماني ، وحتى العرب وقبائلهم فلا لسان ولا حرف لهم إلا اللسان العربي المُبين ، الذي هو حرف ووجه واحد للكلام ، فقط أما تلك الوجوه وتلك القراءات فهي من بدع ومذاهب من أوجدها ، فخالف بها غيره ، وهي من ضلالتهم وتجرأهم على كتاب الله ، كما هي ضلالتهم وتجرأهم على الله بالنسخ والناسخ والمنسوخ .

[@AlphaOmega888]

Ya habib I think this narrative has HOLES in it

[@AlMiftahulIslam]

Holes or wholes?

[@sall8844]

Wonder where did jesus the son of god or mary came from?

[@sall8844]

@@mzmi1422 Incase you don't know, in my country, yesus and Prophet Isa a.s are two different people. Muslims and Christian agree to that narrative...we muslim can curse/insult jesus/yesus as much as we want... Tell me why translate Isa as name to yesus/jesus?

[@sall8844]

@@mzmi1422 Want to know the truth...just search CP versi Indonesia..the level of insult to Allah and Prophet Muhammad beyond imagination...! Much more easier to follow their narrative than to convince them that Isa and yesus are the same person. Their top scholars says so including CP...!

[@xshura3780]

@@sall8844 how does it feel to be smelly? must be hard after you got kicked outta that messy basement of yours.