The Rise Of Chinese Jets - ARJ21, C919, C929, C939 | COMAC's Answer To Boeing And Airbus!

  Рет қаралды 1,147,873

Found And Explained

Found And Explained

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 2 400
@wetot2
@wetot2 3 жыл бұрын
Ironicaly the first Boeing engineer who designed Boeing first mass produced, the legendary model C, was Wong Tsu, born in Beijing in 1893. You can see his biography in Museum of Flight in USA
@NA-Daniel
@NA-Daniel 2 жыл бұрын
Ironicaly the first Boeing engineer who designed Boeing first mass produced, the legendary model C, was Wong Tsu, born in Beijing in 1893. You can see his biography in Museum of Flight in USA. To be or not be depend on Chinese?
@가엽-l5r
@가엽-l5r 2 жыл бұрын
Whoa! Thanks for the interesting info.
@daravikki
@daravikki 2 жыл бұрын
Really?
@mottscottison6943
@mottscottison6943 2 жыл бұрын
Ironically one of the pioneers of JPL that gives NASA rocket engines was Qian Xuesen, born in Hangzhou 1911, aka the father of China's rocket and nukes.
@qcyp16888
@qcyp16888 2 жыл бұрын
@@daravikki 波音第一个工程师,中国北京人
@danielkorladis7869
@danielkorladis7869 3 жыл бұрын
COMAC doesn't actually really need their aircraft to be widely adopted by western airlines. There are more people in China than in the USA, UK, and EU combined.
@thatguyalex2835
@thatguyalex2835 3 жыл бұрын
And the airplane falls apart after 8 months since it is made in China. Window is taped with duct tape, and engine oscillates violently. Flight computers crash running Windows 95. Just kidding. :) That's a stereotype that things made in China break down so easily. I wish the plane manufacturer success in this competitive industry.
@armandofernandez8257
@armandofernandez8257 3 жыл бұрын
Yes that's true but half of the Country is Dead broke so poor they can't afford to fly
@haditjandradjaja8403
@haditjandradjaja8403 3 жыл бұрын
I wanna see ASAP a hypersonic Mach 5 semi outerspace jumbo 400 pax hypersonic jet made by CNSA+COMAC. Considering all their outerspace projects nowadays are full of success. Go China, make a hypersonic Mach 5 jumbo 400 pax with turboramjets single crystal engine blades with graphene skin n graphene fuselage n 6G communication.
@thatguyalex2835
@thatguyalex2835 3 жыл бұрын
@@haditjandradjaja8403 I would love to see any supersonic/hypersonic airplane nowadays. No passenger plane in 2022 travels faster than Mach 0.88, sadly. We need a Mach 2 plane, and a Mach 3 plane, and finally a Mach 5 one in the next 10, 20, and 30-40 years respectively. :) That probably won't happen though.
@haditjandradjaja8403
@haditjandradjaja8403 3 жыл бұрын
@@thatguyalex2835in fact, by only just listening that roaring afterburner at take off, its fire exhaust, the sonic boom of a Concorde in real life, i think i have already full of satisfication. All of those were only in memory n video. I am excluding fighter/bomber military supersonic jets.
@funnymonkeee9803
@funnymonkeee9803 3 жыл бұрын
The main reason China is developing their own planes is to keep up with Chinese demand for airliners. There is too much demand. China cannot wait years for an airliner. Also old planes have to be replaced with new planes because of air safety regulations. So there is a huge growing backlog for airplanes
@mottscottison6943
@mottscottison6943 2 жыл бұрын
And security. Not wanting another MH370 full of Huawei engineers flying towards the direction of Diego Garcia and went 'missing'. Or another flight 5735 that nose dived for no reason.
@solarfinder
@solarfinder Жыл бұрын
Like other nations & manufacturers, I would love it if China was truly transparent with their aircraft safety. If you look at their e car industry, their cars still have a long way to go to meet western reliability and safety, so until this happens, you will see me enjoy the aircraft from a distance.
@charlieqin1083
@charlieqin1083 Жыл бұрын
If you look at what G7 did to Russia when Russia-Ukraine war happened, it makes sense to be self-reliant.
@johnstuartsmith
@johnstuartsmith Жыл бұрын
@@charlieqin1083 Maybe it makes even more sense not to invade neighboring countries.
@ihatecabbage7270
@ihatecabbage7270 6 ай бұрын
@@solarfinder i mean, Boeing prefer to murder whistleblowers than to admit their planes are falling apart.
@longfang98
@longfang98 4 жыл бұрын
As far as certification goes, Boeing gave China a gift in making the FAA look so incompetant and at the same time boosting the image of the CAAC.
@B-A-L
@B-A-L 3 жыл бұрын
Exactly the same happened to the British airline industry in the 1950s after the problems with the Comet.
@CherrySmokeShopGiftsLongBeach
@CherrySmokeShopGiftsLongBeach 3 жыл бұрын
i dont think is a gift is big market world , this way american can feed people...you want sell you shit here open ass .
@haditjandradjaja8403
@haditjandradjaja8403 3 жыл бұрын
FAA ??? Ever hear MAX 8 dude ???
@u-know-this
@u-know-this 3 жыл бұрын
true they should let china Comac certify their own planes on behalf of the FAA just like Boeing does. no need for favoritism lol
@peterphan3524
@peterphan3524 2 жыл бұрын
@@BeardedBavarianBiker Don't be surprise they good at that.
@wsurfer2147
@wsurfer2147 4 жыл бұрын
China just uses its own planes domestically first. That's a lot of planes that it does not need to buy from abroad.
@peterhkpcr951
@peterhkpcr951 4 жыл бұрын
The domestic market for 1.4 billion consumers in China is more than the total consumers for usa and all five eyes nations plus G7 nations added up together. Great demand for building up aircraft industry!!! Cheer China!!
@bigearz255
@bigearz255 4 жыл бұрын
Good idea, test them on the Chinese first
@minus21334
@minus21334 4 жыл бұрын
@@bigearz255 boeing should do the same. stop selling planes that kill people
@kiranrana5108
@kiranrana5108 4 жыл бұрын
India also uses their own Built airplanes...in domestic market. The list is long .. Canada Brazil Checoslovskia Austria Indonesia Vietnam Australia About 55 countries Make their own built Aircraft ...
@minus21334
@minus21334 4 жыл бұрын
@@kiranrana5108 this is what happened when you live in bollywood.
@FALprofessional
@FALprofessional 3 жыл бұрын
Can't really complain about a disruption to a duopoly. Complacency gives us the likes of the debacle that is the 737 MAX situation. Competition is welcome, but validation by regulating bodies like the FAA should not be rushed. Give it time.
@martinanthonybrooks1351
@martinanthonybrooks1351 2 жыл бұрын
Competition and money were the root cause of the 737 Max problems. The Boeing people who told them it was an unsafe design must have been ignored by management .
@kianhong8557
@kianhong8557 4 жыл бұрын
Let's be totally fair here, China is entering an already established market, surely whatever design they come up with, especially considering its their first, would resemble some sort of plane that already exists?
@maxhaines3794
@maxhaines3794 4 жыл бұрын
Amen
@DP1AN
@DP1AN 4 жыл бұрын
As a Chinese, I think probably yes, but maybe some higher specs would still make it competitive
@alexspartan3842
@alexspartan3842 4 жыл бұрын
the cr929 looks like some sort of bootleg version of the 787
@vusimdudu9033
@vusimdudu9033 4 жыл бұрын
This seems self evident to me, as most planes to date are very similar. I see nothing wrong in starting in the same mode, then as more experience is gained and mistakes are made, you improve and improve.
@juliojames5986
@juliojames5986 4 жыл бұрын
Duh !
@burung81
@burung81 4 жыл бұрын
the journey of 1000 miles begin with a single step. Just like low end hp that china buiilt a decade ago, everyone was laughing at the quality.
@BELCAN57
@BELCAN57 4 жыл бұрын
The journey of a thousand miles begins with the first piece of stolen technology.
@blee04524
@blee04524 4 жыл бұрын
@@BELCAN57 you a virgin or what this happens in every country
@ilovecops6255
@ilovecops6255 4 жыл бұрын
mIles was invented by a whute guy. Thats for the support.
@yohan1004
@yohan1004 4 жыл бұрын
China stole So Much
@neilrenavikar3585
@neilrenavikar3585 4 жыл бұрын
The journey of airbus started with high quality aircraft. The journey of China will start with crap and end with crap
@JW-xr9kb
@JW-xr9kb 4 жыл бұрын
well, the westerns laughed at China's nuclear, rockets, space and telecom projects before.
@JW-xr9kb
@JW-xr9kb 4 жыл бұрын
​@William Langeman Which technology you meant? the one originally from Nazi Germany? time.com/5627637/nasa-nazi-von-braun/ By the way, I don't think China should get credit from America's bombs dropped around the world, only because China invented gunpowder. Americans should be proud of their wars just as how they are proud of their space achievements. America as Number One, no one can deny this.
@JW-xr9kb
@JW-xr9kb 4 жыл бұрын
@William Langeman From your comment, we can see how ignorant you are, you said China has never won any Nobel Prize. But actually, China has won 3, 2 Nobel Peace Prize, 1 Nobel Prize in Medicine. What China is doing now, accepting the facts China is still far behind, but taking it as the motivation to improve and progress. What you are doing, is to be ignorant, stupid, and take advantages from the hardworking scientists from the western world.
@ilovecops6255
@ilovecops6255 4 жыл бұрын
STILL LAUGHING!
@junkeatng
@junkeatng 4 жыл бұрын
@William Langeman better than being a dead man when getting on a Max.
@junkeatng
@junkeatng 4 жыл бұрын
www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2020/03/18/jim-cramer-says-boeing-will-run-out-of-money-if-it-is-not-saved.html Boeing's running out of cash so no Max replacement for some time. Nobody's flying anyway.
@roger9195
@roger9195 4 жыл бұрын
People should realise that for everyone of these jets sold it means it's one less sale of Airbus or Boeing. Given the current global aviation mess, A and B are in trouble.
@olefella7561
@olefella7561 4 жыл бұрын
You're on point. Global aviation industry needs to be much more comparative and expand; a little more than Boeing & Airbus as today. Just like European cooperation, namely among Germany France Britain etc; there should be Asian cooperation,among China Japan Korea Taiwan Singapore etc. A website with 4 million views says it all at, blog.chinadaily.com.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1795128
@thiago8867
@thiago8867 3 жыл бұрын
couldnt care less about an american and an european airlines.
@KMZR
@KMZR 3 жыл бұрын
@@oxcart4172 cool
@Randomvideos-zi7pe
@Randomvideos-zi7pe 3 жыл бұрын
well, you can not worry about it because the US special exports are hitting comac hard. Political rules are in play here.
@thatguyalex2835
@thatguyalex2835 3 жыл бұрын
@@oxcart4172 lol... Every plane manufacturer was in trouble now, due to Covid-19.
@Lagoost
@Lagoost 4 жыл бұрын
Now everybody knows there are a big sour grapes appear😁
@dyu999
@dyu999 3 жыл бұрын
without foreign components, these merely a pile of junks, hahahahahahhhhhhhh
@Lagoost
@Lagoost 3 жыл бұрын
@@dyu999 Haha, the first comment is a Chinese traitor 😁
@dyu999
@dyu999 3 жыл бұрын
@@Lagoost I serve the Queen👑, Fxxkwit
@Lagoost
@Lagoost 3 жыл бұрын
@@dyu999 Useless, helpless second class citizen who like a fish out of water. GTFO...
@dyu999
@dyu999 3 жыл бұрын
@@Lagoost Unfortunately, i live better than you
@Kaldorey
@Kaldorey 3 жыл бұрын
Am working in airworthiness certification in France. Can confirm certification by Europe's EASA and US' FAA won't be easy for the Comac aircrafts. On the other end, they do have strong support of the Chinese airworthiness authority (CAAC), but tbh it's the same for Airbus and Boeing with their local authorities. But CAAC is also acquiring information from Airbus and Boeing by using political pressure : they were asking to see more technical data than necessary to validate A320neo certification, and threatening "otherwise reviewing the info to publish the certificate miiiight take a bit more time" [insert South-Park "we're sorry" meme]. As most of Airbus and Boeing's market openings come from Chinese companies, delaying certification will delay delivery of airplanes and thus provoke commercial & logistical issues.
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 жыл бұрын
Its a tricky thing to get a new plane certified
@u-know-this
@u-know-this 3 жыл бұрын
yes it wont be easy because of fear and politics . otherwise in the long run they will get and if not they will still survive with out it. they have a HUge HuGe local market
@wongyoonchark5050
@wongyoonchark5050 2 жыл бұрын
scarly take flight boeing 777max.
@sjv9147s
@sjv9147s 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the heads up.
@zszs100
@zszs100 4 жыл бұрын
correction: arj21 is certified in Eu, same with c919.
@jzNottobee
@jzNottobee 3 жыл бұрын
But they are not going to be certified in the US any time soon. Americans can’t accept the fact that Chinese aircraft are flying over American soil.
@marcs5117
@marcs5117 3 жыл бұрын
@@jzNottobee they eventually have to or else boeing will lose its certification to fly over china. Haha
@josephsamoto2408
@josephsamoto2408 3 жыл бұрын
@@marcs5117 , Ha! ha! ha! you are right.
@josephsamoto2408
@josephsamoto2408 3 жыл бұрын
it's not necessairy to have their certificat because it's necessary going there, too many gangsters, pan! pan! pan! too dangerose
@josephsamoto2408
@josephsamoto2408 3 жыл бұрын
China will do the same thing.
@abdourahmanealkhalifa191
@abdourahmanealkhalifa191 3 жыл бұрын
The US - 2021: The Chinese cannot have a strong aviation industry. The US- 2029: Let's impose sanctions on the Chinese aviation industry.
@josephsamoto2408
@josephsamoto2408 3 жыл бұрын
Chinese may retork.
@kevinpillai4474
@kevinpillai4474 3 жыл бұрын
China will rule the world
@mysterio952
@mysterio952 3 жыл бұрын
Strong industry yes... But at what cost?
@ricardoluitam
@ricardoluitam 2 жыл бұрын
Amazing video. Keep up the good work. Support
@remi_gio
@remi_gio 4 жыл бұрын
Great format and the amount of work you put in really shows ;-) ..got yourself a subscriber✈️😉
@smartbaba1321
@smartbaba1321 Жыл бұрын
As Indian, I wanna congratulate that country.. Atleast someone trying to brake monopoly of west in another sector.
@user-zj8cf3fq8e
@user-zj8cf3fq8e 4 жыл бұрын
Its going to be a long journey for Chinese aviation. But, they will eventually get there and be able to compete. They have done it in all other sectors. Also remember that China has only really started this industry in the last 20 years and will probably take another 10 years to perfect the product and another 10 years to out perform their rivals.
@cocofirst3967
@cocofirst3967 4 жыл бұрын
Yes. China has the time and the market.
@darkokoporcic7146
@darkokoporcic7146 4 жыл бұрын
It will also stall when the West realizes the full scale of its mistake in the nineties (out of sheer greed) and reduces trade with China, preventing further stealing of tech.
@cocofirst3967
@cocofirst3967 4 жыл бұрын
@@darkokoporcic7146 Greed never know what it means by too late.
@alexusa100
@alexusa100 4 жыл бұрын
@@darkokoporcic7146 China is one of the only three countries (US, Russia, China) that are capable of independently, safely sending astronauts to space (UK, France, Germany, Japan can’t do that yet.) It's a mistake to always think China is a low-tech country.
@peterleung8372
@peterleung8372 4 жыл бұрын
The space station and the satellite to the back of the moon moron
@catrojana3694
@catrojana3694 4 жыл бұрын
After Covid, there'll be a lot of second hand jets with low mileage.
@johnleong4807
@johnleong4807 4 жыл бұрын
Chinese have learned the lessons of humiliation and suppression from history and American administration. It's no harm to take longer years to achieve from the chinese point of view because a united country has a united engineering work force behind working as a team to build better and reliable commercial jet planes in the coming near future.
@cocofirst3967
@cocofirst3967 4 жыл бұрын
China has the time to develop the full range of planes in the coming years.
@dman1327
@dman1327 4 жыл бұрын
The Chinese communist government has not had to ask permission to build planes. They have experience of humiliation and suppression from it's own anti freedom government. From their corporate scandals, to limiting freedom of expression and ideas constantly limiting potential. Jack Ma looks sad all the time under constant fear of his government.
@jantschierschky3461
@jantschierschky3461 3 жыл бұрын
Well yes wumao
@cocofirst3967
@cocofirst3967 3 жыл бұрын
@@jantschierschky3461 Understand that the word "wumao" is for losers who either believe it is true and can find no word to retort, or found that the truth simply hurts.
@leyizh
@leyizh 3 жыл бұрын
I really wish US and China were closer allies
@cnmd1636
@cnmd1636 4 жыл бұрын
Though it is its long term goal, but right row China is not worry about any certificates issue because even it produces those airplanes, its production line probably cannot even meet the needs of its own market which as this video mentioned that need over 8000 airplanes in the next 20 years.
@felixsu375
@felixsu375 4 жыл бұрын
He who owns the market owns who's plane will fly in that market. Western airlines aren't going to order 8,900 planes. China is.
@freddiethompson58
@freddiethompson58 4 жыл бұрын
Boeing 737Max will not fly anytime soon.
@米空軍パイロット
@米空軍パイロット 4 жыл бұрын
@@freddiethompson58 I have a feeling your comment won't age well.
@米空軍パイロット
@米空軍パイロット 4 жыл бұрын
@@freddiethompson58 I didn't get to read your entire reply. Youtubr only displays part of it in the notifications.
@freddiethompson58
@freddiethompson58 4 жыл бұрын
@@米空軍パイロット I'm sorry, but there is nothing I can do about the censorship. The free world that they like to portray is no more so free.
@reynaldolimesak6732
@reynaldolimesak6732 4 жыл бұрын
@Mac Bean but now USA and India are undisputed COVID19 true Champions 😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 , congratulations 🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪😜😜😜😜😜
@TheKolian1996
@TheKolian1996 4 жыл бұрын
Great channel, thank you!
@Zerpentsa6598
@Zerpentsa6598 4 жыл бұрын
Now that China has sorted out the WS-15, it can move on to make a civilian version for the C929. It will get there.
@weixiaoli6158
@weixiaoli6158 4 жыл бұрын
ws15 is not energy saving
@georgedang449
@georgedang449 4 жыл бұрын
High performance high fuel consumption fighter engines and low performance high efficiency airliner engines present whole different set of challenges. But yes, high bypass turbofans aren't necessarily more difficult to perfect than WS-15. Assuming they started working on both at around the same time, they should finish both at around the same time.
@Zerpentsa6598
@Zerpentsa6598 4 жыл бұрын
@@weixiaoli6158 it's a learning exercise. It will improve.
@cocofirst3967
@cocofirst3967 4 жыл бұрын
Off course it will, time is on their side.
@jzNottobee
@jzNottobee 3 жыл бұрын
No, WS is military turbo fan engines for fighter jets. For C919 there’s CJ 1000A, just unveiled. Google it.
@asingh5482
@asingh5482 3 жыл бұрын
This is indeed a great achievement.
@MultiGrumman
@MultiGrumman 4 жыл бұрын
Очень приятно, когда люди работают эффективно. Спасибо за видео:).
@satirthsarthak6887
@satirthsarthak6887 4 жыл бұрын
China is the 4th player in Aviation Industry, you are forgetting Russia which also is a key player after US and Europe in aviation industry such as "Tuplov", "MCs " competing Airbus and Boeing
@supertouring1
@supertouring1 2 жыл бұрын
You're also forgetting Embraer.
@Nawabid
@Nawabid 4 жыл бұрын
You're doing a GREAT JOB my friend. I am a big fan of Aviation Channels, you are my NEW "GO TO" channel. Keep up the great effort. Produce more quality videos like this, soon you will have MILLIONS OF SUBS (God willing)!!! (New Subscriber)
@Nawabid
@Nawabid 4 жыл бұрын
Keep this comment as a reminder, when you hit the 1 mil sub.
@andrewleeandrewlee5615
@andrewleeandrewlee5615 3 жыл бұрын
4
@Glen.Danielsen
@Glen.Danielsen 3 жыл бұрын
Excellent video! 💛🙏🏼
@portuguesnomundo
@portuguesnomundo 3 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video ✈️❤️
@rickfeith6372
@rickfeith6372 4 жыл бұрын
The 919 has a very Bombardier CS300 look about it... especially the nose. Good looking airplane in my opinion. Competition is healthy, there is definitely room for another top dog to keep the west on their toes.
@amd64online
@amd64online 4 жыл бұрын
Another top dog? Remove the "top" from your comment & you'll be spot on. Zero components in their aircraft are based on any Intelectual Property owned by China. Take a look at any electronics component buillt by the Chinese, if they have credibilitly they'll state that components used come from Japan or Korea.
@nntflow7058
@nntflow7058 4 жыл бұрын
I prefer Mitsubishi though. Can't really trust the Chinese or Russian Government.
@Zakaius
@Zakaius 4 жыл бұрын
It's mainly for their domestic consumption market n airline operators. So, indeed why buy Western ones for local use.
@djtan3313
@djtan3313 4 жыл бұрын
Correct. But prejudice is much more difficult to overcome than technical knowledge.
@kirk2632
@kirk2632 4 жыл бұрын
No surprize. China has been copying other countries for thousands of years. If you look at the Chinese ancient rocket, what can you remember of? yes, it is exactly like the modern rocket. Ancient Chinese copied U.S modern technologies from thousands years ago. Why surprize if the Chinese steal the idea of having two wings on a plane?
@cheahkaikooi2753
@cheahkaikooi2753 4 жыл бұрын
Don't laugh! One of these days in near future, one country will use security reason to force the allies not buy Chinese aircrafts, like what happen to huawei today. Or one can supply engines to them.
@cocofirst3967
@cocofirst3967 4 жыл бұрын
By then, China will gave their own engine... the same story repeating...
@josephsamoto2408
@josephsamoto2408 3 жыл бұрын
Kai, and they will make less money. A big opportunity for chinese companies to build theire own need.
@haidweng7948
@haidweng7948 3 жыл бұрын
Lol, Chinese is still a dictator country
@EE-em8gg
@EE-em8gg 3 жыл бұрын
No worries bro,the rest of the world is with china.
@voidlight6006
@voidlight6006 3 жыл бұрын
@@EE-em8gg free hong kong
@Musikur
@Musikur 4 жыл бұрын
I have to say, the 919 is a nice looking plane. I'm not sure I'd want to travel on one until they have been around a while, but they do look nice.
@zulkanainbaharuddin2185
@zulkanainbaharuddin2185 2 жыл бұрын
Well, 737 max.....
@bunyavissuthisorn5909
@bunyavissuthisorn5909 2 жыл бұрын
It sounds U do not rely on 919. .......
@realmikuset
@realmikuset 3 жыл бұрын
Can't wait to be on one of these.
@jensensean7118
@jensensean7118 3 жыл бұрын
A number of jet engines of different specs and sizes are under R&D in China, it is not from scratch, they are already able to produce large thrust turbofan engine good enough for fighter jets, and they have all the moving parts in place. May take another 10 years to catch up on this front, but the low hanging mid-thrust to large thrust jet engine are achivable. The fuselage and the avionics and landing gears are ok now.
@Pwj579
@Pwj579 2 жыл бұрын
China has learned about the failures of Russia in trying to go it alone. The US technology companies were just thinking $$$ in licensing agreements, not really understanding that Chinese Government-owned Aviation Industry were playing them to get all of their IP, just to build on their own and terminate licensing agreements.
@bishnubohara7576
@bishnubohara7576 3 жыл бұрын
I'm from Nepal.China's successes always makes us happy. It's also a happy moment for us that China is going to produce airbuses.
@bunyavissuthisorn5909
@bunyavissuthisorn5909 2 жыл бұрын
I am from Thailand, we were unhappy with Sinovac and Tigers, motorcycle.
@holdensv2000
@holdensv2000 4 жыл бұрын
Hi, sir the way things are going that I will be willing to fly on any Chinese built aircraft before I will ever trust to fly on any building. I like the Comac C919 and the C929 I have not set the C939 as yet but I guess I have to fly on it when it comes. I trust China not to rush or put short cuts on any of their aircraft because it will be a bad reputation at the start so I trust them to get it right
@CP1900PC
@CP1900PC 4 жыл бұрын
I’m a Chinese, and I wish I could have the same amount of faith and trust in products Chinese made. I am just unable to do it, cos I know the Chinese government spent more on PR for its project and product other than R&D. Things are made in China are just poor quality. I would rather taking a B737max any day than an aeroplane built by China. Sure, you might think China would take the lessons from the failure of US. The reality is the technique of building this aeroplane is from the US with some adaption. There is simply no R&D spent in terms of time and money. The failure with B737 Max is the cause that we know, but if there is a failure in an aeroplane Chinese built, we probably could never find out, plus the cover up is the most advanced technique China are good at only. Stay safe, mate!
@frankfeng4728
@frankfeng4728 4 жыл бұрын
@@CP1900PC You are probably a Chinese (no offending) but I guess you don’t live in China. Otherwise your life is miserable with fears about so much stuff you can’t avoid.
@nayanmalig
@nayanmalig 4 жыл бұрын
@@CP1900PC LOL massive sour grapes detected
@irritatedanglosaxon1705
@irritatedanglosaxon1705 4 жыл бұрын
@muhammad LOL great sarcasm everrrr
@HTeo-og1lg
@HTeo-og1lg 4 жыл бұрын
@@CP1900PC. Maybe you are a Chinese. But then again, it would be naiive for anyone to believe you are a Chinese. On the internet, there is no way to prove that a moniker is who he/she claims to be. Bye, and good luck with whoever you are boy, girl, man or woman, or transgender, etc.
@RadicalFloat_95
@RadicalFloat_95 11 ай бұрын
This video is actually genuinely underated and this is actually the actual real China that the actual American and British BBC propaganda mainstream media actually don't show you is actually really like and actually capable of actually doing
@mohiuddinahmad1792
@mohiuddinahmad1792 Жыл бұрын
Nice video.
@peacefullifetv5065
@peacefullifetv5065 3 жыл бұрын
The right step taken
@zohurulhaquejafor5504
@zohurulhaquejafor5504 4 жыл бұрын
COMAC will be the next aviation giant...
@josephting-zk8ob
@josephting-zk8ob 4 жыл бұрын
2:10 "... But we'll get into that." 4:52 "... But we will get to that later." 6:22 "... So if you wanna get on this Chinese plane with me, hit that subscribe button down below and I'll sure to send you a ticket." Do I have to wait until the cows come home or the Moon rise from the west to see your promise come true? OR you have had too much stubby that you forgot about what you had said? OR you just TOKOK?
@iamachinesepetwholies5476
@iamachinesepetwholies5476 4 жыл бұрын
Lol nice one
@cocofirst3967
@cocofirst3967 4 жыл бұрын
China and the Chinese is unlike the western mentality. They have the patience, the time and the demand. Like the usual say, if you cant wait, take the other planes.... why bother?
@TroysMilitaryHistory
@TroysMilitaryHistory 4 жыл бұрын
If you don't like the video, why don't you do a better one yourself?
@johnphoon
@johnphoon 4 жыл бұрын
Very pleasant voice.... Clear n soothing on listening..... 👍👍👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏
@MrGanbat84
@MrGanbat84 3 жыл бұрын
Very good. I like it at all. 👏👏👏👏
@felixcat9318
@felixcat9318 4 жыл бұрын
I found this video to be interesting, informative and entertaining, with clear, relevant imagery and good narration.Subscribed.
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 4 жыл бұрын
Each video takes anywhere from 12-30 hours to make. I could just film a PowerPoint and pump out videos but I think you deserve a bit better. And when they come together and I get a comment like this I am smiling all day!
@rupeshshrestha5445
@rupeshshrestha5445 4 жыл бұрын
Everyone in the comments : won't fly Chinese plane, won't be safe. 737 max:😁😁😁
@jcord0013
@jcord0013 4 жыл бұрын
Look at who crashed those planes.
@danielxv9
@danielxv9 4 жыл бұрын
I prefer 737 max or 737 100 old but safety.
@ablam8
@ablam8 4 жыл бұрын
Now the pilots don't want to fly 787's that are made in eastern US.
@oneandonly2043
@oneandonly2043 4 жыл бұрын
Jealousy is a very bad thing, it makes a person hollow inside, so it should be avoided. .
@cocofirst3967
@cocofirst3967 4 жыл бұрын
The saying the envy and hatred cause more stress to the envious and the haters.
@drphilgee6430
@drphilgee6430 3 жыл бұрын
Chinese have been JEALOUS of the West for a Very long Time....
@thomaszhang3101
@thomaszhang3101 3 жыл бұрын
@@drphilgee6430 not jealous, but admiring or envious of the west for a long time. Jealousy leads to fear, insecurity, and rejection of the west, while envy and admiration leads to desire and action of imitating the west.
@kwask6062
@kwask6062 2 жыл бұрын
Keep it up well done 👍
@sethtan715
@sethtan715 4 жыл бұрын
nice documentary
@biddy657
@biddy657 4 жыл бұрын
Wheres Lockheed. They need to get back into commercial aviation. Boeing needs competition
@NJTDover
@NJTDover 4 жыл бұрын
Lockheed is alone devouring the huge military contracts from the Pentagon cake.
@maxhaines3794
@maxhaines3794 4 жыл бұрын
And Boeing recieves ongoing punishment from Airbus...but no wonder after those greedy managers of Boeing ruined this great company.
@biddy657
@biddy657 4 жыл бұрын
I feel competition with Airbus isn’t enough to put fire under Boeings butt and we need an experienced player like Lockheed to get in the game. I see COMAC copying and pasting ideas for a while so not too much competition.
@biddy657
@biddy657 4 жыл бұрын
Nexusfast123 I don’t think its competition anymore. Instead they contact each other and agree to update their current products and fill each-others voids.
@maxhaines3794
@maxhaines3794 4 жыл бұрын
Anthony But this is in aviation very common...even GA aircrafts r looking all nearly the same just take the TBM series together with the Pilatus PC 12 and the new but old Cessna Denali as example...just the TBM has other elevators...but there is a reason why most planes have almost the same look. Its a rellable design which is prooven😴
@mickkrever4084
@mickkrever4084 4 жыл бұрын
99% of Chinese Aircrafts are owned by State Companies, so yeah... if there is a purchase from a Chinese carrier it is "likely" to be from a state-owned company.
@simonnuman6840
@simonnuman6840 4 жыл бұрын
I mean, so what? That means money going back to the people.
@Peizxcv
@Peizxcv 4 жыл бұрын
Government owned, not state owned. Most Chinese airlines have provincial or city government as the largest shareholder, not the national government in Beijing which would be the “state”
@kaikart123
@kaikart123 4 жыл бұрын
@@simonnuman6840 you mean going back to the CCP members
@simonnuman6840
@simonnuman6840 4 жыл бұрын
@@kaikart123 the Chinese gov subsidies a lot more than most western nations, like all governments high ranking officials get a cut but in this case the average individual gets a much better deal (though still not fair).
@nicolass180
@nicolass180 4 жыл бұрын
Because of it is Stata own most likely Tickets will be more economical
@jackshen5093
@jackshen5093 4 жыл бұрын
Great video! Unfortunately, the development of the C919 has been slowed down this year due to pandemic and the engine production problems that you mentioned. Still hoping for this jet to succeed!
@qcyp16888
@qcyp16888 2 жыл бұрын
放心,我们有cj1000和cj2000发动机选择
@tanahdijual3232
@tanahdijual3232 2 жыл бұрын
Awesome Comac 929
@myusername3689
@myusername3689 2 жыл бұрын
Boeing and Airbus also have military projects. I wonder if Comac would rival or even overthrow Chengdu and Shenyang in the Chinese Air Force some day.
@qcyp16888
@qcyp16888 2 жыл бұрын
有竞争才有进步
@realhuman4396
@realhuman4396 2 жыл бұрын
COMAC (Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China) Based on their name it’s highly unlikely. Even if it does happen it will be much later, after they gain a good reputation with more aircraft.
@alone-tt8dg6ic6f
@alone-tt8dg6ic6f 4 жыл бұрын
Great achievement in the field of aviation Industries and self-reliance.
@macdonelldouglas
@macdonelldouglas 3 жыл бұрын
Iam happy with China 🇨🇳 progressing ,They are dedicated, so don't laugh at them they'll overcome anything they are well focused with hard work.
@charlieong5636
@charlieong5636 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your kind words. Have a nice day! 😊
@cancelanime1507
@cancelanime1507 3 жыл бұрын
Lmao you mean stealing western designs? No way you aren't a bot..
@imycunt372
@imycunt372 3 жыл бұрын
@@cancelanime1507 Didn’t NASA stole Nazi V2 rocket scientist to propel man into moon?
@cancelanime1507
@cancelanime1507 3 жыл бұрын
@@imycunt372 Yes because the Saturn 5, Mercury and Gemini rockets looked like the V2..
@TETRAsp
@TETRAsp 3 жыл бұрын
What is China? Oooohh you mean Mainland Taiwan 🇹🇼🇹🇼🇹🇼
@sonaldosui8154
@sonaldosui8154 4 жыл бұрын
Planes are a really hard thing, compare with trains.
@kokboonshin4850
@kokboonshin4850 4 жыл бұрын
No worry , Chinese and east asian they are good in copying and imitating any kind of products although they don't have such the creative talent comparing to the west , i believe they will catch up ....... that's why USA already in panic
@sonaldosui8154
@sonaldosui8154 4 жыл бұрын
@@kokboonshin4850 That's learning, not really copy. If that product doesn’t have copyright, any company can copy it as learning.
@chiangchengkooi9791
@chiangchengkooi9791 3 жыл бұрын
Landing on Mars and Moon are even more hard.
@sugbosugbo1987
@sugbosugbo1987 Жыл бұрын
@@kokboonshin4850 Chinese in USA will send technology to China While Chinese in China wont send technology to US. Eventually China will overtake US in any field.
@ahmedsiddique9511
@ahmedsiddique9511 4 жыл бұрын
China is third player in the world in aviation industry great achievement by Asian gent china love from india
@captainvio3862
@captainvio3862 3 жыл бұрын
May you know how long is the 939???
@peterhkpcr951
@peterhkpcr951 4 жыл бұрын
The domestic market for 1.4 billion consumers in China is more than the total consumers for usa and all five eyes nations plus G7 nations added up together. Great demand for building up aircraft industry!!! Cheer China!!
@justsain3236
@justsain3236 3 жыл бұрын
Its very clear that the US doesn't want China to succeed. Obviously because they will be losing out on market share.
@عبداللهالضراسي-ظ8د
@عبداللهالضراسي-ظ8د 3 жыл бұрын
الصين فعلا ستنجح ثم توازي ثم تسبق ..وان كان ذلك الآن يتطلب جهدا وتقنية عالية للحاق ببوينج وايرباص والاعاقات كثيرة والمجال عملاق ليس سهل لكنها ستناله .
@juancmorales8008
@juancmorales8008 4 жыл бұрын
Century XXI built by 🇨🇳 CHINA. 5 thousand years history of culture confirm we can thrust on this frend and immense NATION. ✈ Nice Airplanes⭐
@hredhanbhuyan9323
@hredhanbhuyan9323 Жыл бұрын
First it was products. Now it’s every thing you see in stores. Now It’s Companies. And now, AVIATION?!
@ironheart8690
@ironheart8690 4 жыл бұрын
China the mighty, respects from Pakistan.
@bingyangyu6327
@bingyangyu6327 4 жыл бұрын
Next time I should travel on a COMAC plane to Pakistan and see our best friends!
@keith6371
@keith6371 4 жыл бұрын
i see pretty good future for 919 (they dont need FAA certification to fly within China or most of Chinese friendly states in Africa and Asia). C929 is going to be hard since that thing will fly long distance between countries, makes FAA certification a must, and I dont really see a four engine jet being made in 21st century. C939 is probably not going to happen.
@bluemilk4909
@bluemilk4909 4 жыл бұрын
9:19 So true. I think that the future of aviation is centered around Airbus, and (it might take years,) COMAC The Chinese invest everywhere so it’s impossible that they would let these fail
@jlassijlali290
@jlassijlali290 4 жыл бұрын
Also china has influence on many rise African economic so it will sell their plane
@get_emld
@get_emld 4 жыл бұрын
But I doubt they’re gonna get into the US and European markets, at least not for decades
@KMZR
@KMZR 3 жыл бұрын
well-said
@aviaspotter32
@aviaspotter32 2 жыл бұрын
@@get_emld europe probably, US no
@keith6371
@keith6371 4 жыл бұрын
Man it is embarrassing to see so many uninformed people in an aviation channel. If you ever fly in Asia In the past 8 years, chances are good you flow on a made in China airbus a320 which were made with mostly Chinese parts . If you ever flow in the last 10 years, chances are critical parts of your flight, regardless whether it was Boeing or airbus were made in China. Like vertical stabilizer, land gear, pressure hull, etc.
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 4 жыл бұрын
Very true! A lot of people in the comments are saying they will never fly on a China plane, yet 40 years ago they said the same about Airbus, and before that Boeing etc etc.
@ryanjonathanmartin3933
@ryanjonathanmartin3933 3 жыл бұрын
Pretty surprising how many self-proclaimed capitalists hate the idea of trying a new product eh?
@libuprem187
@libuprem187 4 жыл бұрын
Verygood
@nadeemmustafa6450
@nadeemmustafa6450 3 жыл бұрын
Beautiful Aircraft 👍👍👍🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰 Love From Pakistan
@leinardj
@leinardj 4 жыл бұрын
Pretty soon we’re gonna see Made In China tags in the sky.
@cliffordnelson8454
@cliffordnelson8454 4 жыл бұрын
Especially considering how badly Boeing is doing with their new airplanes. 787 program was supposed to be 6 billion but turned out way late and 32 billion. 787 had so many production problems (especially out of the NC plant and they close the Everett production). and the 777x and 737 max have been so messed up, and such horrible decisions on the 737 max for expediency, and outright lies. Boeing has changed so much....become like McD. With such a massive market internally, and if China can create a good economical plane, they can get production up with production for internal use, and this can demonstrate that the plane does the job very well and has excellent safety record...this will make it hard for US and EU not to certify them. It also means that China will understand the support needs, and it will be much easier to expand support worldwide. I suspect this is how Airbus became successful...state airlines were encouraged to use AIrbus, and it became hard for the US not to certify the Airbus given its record.
@leinardj
@leinardj 4 жыл бұрын
@@cliffordnelson8454 Wow..
@VideosCPS
@VideosCPS 3 жыл бұрын
The passengers will hope they are better than the shit China normally turns out. Throw away after twelve months😂 like their cars.
@philipmoll1123
@philipmoll1123 3 жыл бұрын
They will steal the engine design just like they steal most other ideas, ask Russia
@TheZuosamson
@TheZuosamson 3 жыл бұрын
@@cliffordnelson8454 very true, 737 max should be a brand new design to adapt the new engine, 717 is a brillient airplane but very sad.
@coryplum5375
@coryplum5375 4 жыл бұрын
A video about C919 in September 19th, interesting. Btw, I may expect C919 and hope take it in future, but doubt the delivery of C929 and C939.
@fountainofyouth88
@fountainofyouth88 3 жыл бұрын
Good time to be self sufficient
@TalenGryphon
@TalenGryphon 4 жыл бұрын
Boeing: Wow! We really suck at making jets now! China: Hold my counterfeit beer
@herbertstolz1097
@herbertstolz1097 3 жыл бұрын
Harbin was the earliest small passenger plane flown worldwide from China
@atkins8644
@atkins8644 4 жыл бұрын
Good enough and strictly for local consumption. Let Boeing and Airbus do their world market and Comac do theirs.
@yousafmehmet
@yousafmehmet 2 жыл бұрын
Very informative and objective video. Keep it up!🎉
@LaowaiDaveJCP
@LaowaiDaveJCP 4 жыл бұрын
4:50 i'm gonna pretend i'm surprised 😉
@ATIMELINEOFAVIATION
@ATIMELINEOFAVIATION 3 жыл бұрын
lol
@ericye3777
@ericye3777 4 жыл бұрын
China has a huge advantage in that it has a large enough market to develop a world-class company
@dave8599
@dave8599 3 жыл бұрын
Plus another red chinese manufacturing advantage is use of slave labor, and lack of environmental protection rules. the red chinese leaders dont give a damn about the environment nor the well being of their slaves.
@mijiojiolin4840
@mijiojiolin4840 2 жыл бұрын
Love it
@wowbrilliant4412
@wowbrilliant4412 3 жыл бұрын
Just today i flew the ARJ21... It was C O M F Y holy
@wowbrilliant4412
@wowbrilliant4412 3 жыл бұрын
I think these aircraft are good, I dont really know about the C919 to C939 because I didn't really fly them, but I hope the ARJ21 is going to be successful, it even had USB outlets!
@olefella7561
@olefella7561 4 жыл бұрын
Global aviation industry needs to be much more comparative and expanded; a little more than Boeing & Airbus as of today. As in European Aviation Cooperation, namely among Germany, France, Britain etc which established Airbus; there should be Asian Aviation Cooperation, among China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Singapore etc.
@hjhghj462
@hjhghj462 2 жыл бұрын
japan, korea, republic of china, singapore is dog of u.s so, China say : nope, i won't carry them
@kevw2072
@kevw2072 4 жыл бұрын
I am backing China's engineers over America's money saving safety shortcuts any day.
@natf6747
@natf6747 4 жыл бұрын
This is a very interesting video. A lot of what I have seen coming out of China video wise is bad news talking about all their multiple conflicts. If they are true I can’t see this company being around for long due to the aviation industry being a very expensive industry to be in. But time will tell. Also, I think the bias that Chinese products are built cheaper may not translate well to them exporting it. But with Boeing’s past fails, there is a power void to be filled.
@jk9876
@jk9876 Жыл бұрын
2023 now. the company is still here and already delivered the first C919 to its customer. Meanwhile, Japan cancelled its commercial plane project after 15 years of trying and billions wasted.
@JesterHorse
@JesterHorse 4 жыл бұрын
Being an aviation student I believe China is missing the big picture. Small regional jets are dominated by embraer, and bombardier. Boeing and airbus will handle the 737 seating capacity as well as the 290+. What is needed is a middle market hey such as the 767 which seats anywhere from 210-290 passengers. That’s the biggest segment that if full filled it would mean western orders and European orders
@Reddsoldier
@Reddsoldier 3 жыл бұрын
Damn, you've got a real 50 cent army infestation in these comments.
@chielomancini9436
@chielomancini9436 4 жыл бұрын
For static product, its no problem. For dynamics product, sorry im not sure
@chiangchengkooi9791
@chiangchengkooi9791 3 жыл бұрын
What ever, China had reach Mars
@josephting-zk8ob
@josephting-zk8ob 4 жыл бұрын
Aviation Market Main Players :- 1) Airbus, European 2) Boeing, American 3) Bombardier, Canadian 4) Embraer, Brazilian 5) Comac, Chinese
@marscanada7891
@marscanada7891 4 жыл бұрын
Bombardier was killed by usa in jet area
@dandagames6030
@dandagames6030 4 жыл бұрын
@@marscanada7891 not really it's now mostly owned by Airbus and still produces the Q400 if i'm not mistaken and also the C- Series now A220
@FBISHOJI
@FBISHOJI 3 жыл бұрын
6) Antonov, Russian 🇷🇺 7) Sukhoi Also Russian
@deejaykels2893
@deejaykels2893 3 жыл бұрын
@@FBISHOJI beluga
@PreciousAlpschindler
@PreciousAlpschindler 2 жыл бұрын
@@dandagames6030 I'm sure the Q400 is now produced by De Havilland Comet but the C-Series is made by Airbus as the A220
@antoniomaglione4101
@antoniomaglione4101 4 жыл бұрын
Clue to the actual situation, is the level of native engineering skills of Chinese aviation designers.
@johnstuartsmith
@johnstuartsmith Жыл бұрын
That would be true IF China and the Western world were starting from scratch developing commercial airliner businesses. In real life, Chinese aviation is starting to compete with companies that have huge factories already built and paid off, with many years of experience, and worldwide logistical operations and thousands of already trained and well-supplied maintenance people throughout the world. Producing a new model of aircraft involves huge investments that Airbus and Boeing have already made.
@bbc12-81
@bbc12-81 2 жыл бұрын
播主为大飞机C919的水陆道场准备好了吗? 还有八宝山的风水龛位???
@hidemhd1962
@hidemhd1962 Жыл бұрын
4:48 I'd pray for the C919 if Ryanair truly buy those
@danlucas8473
@danlucas8473 4 жыл бұрын
We came across guys like you before, who made fun of Japanese cars in the '70s, then Koren cars in the '90s, and now you are making fun of Chinese planes. It's ok. China has an enormous domestic aviation market. They will make a perfect airplane a couple hundred later and cheap as well. I am very sure about that.
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 4 жыл бұрын
Did you watch the whole video? At the end I give my personal thoughts :)
@wsmithe2209
@wsmithe2209 4 жыл бұрын
The same people said about colored people couldn't run and not very athletic.
@nizam5568
@nizam5568 4 жыл бұрын
3:06 general electric airlines
@tk9839
@tk9839 4 жыл бұрын
I'd rather fly in a comac than a max anyday...
@MISTERPRESIDENTELECT
@MISTERPRESIDENTELECT 3 жыл бұрын
They are using quality engines, and doing proper, rigorous testing. I'd get on that congchong thing, whatever you said it's called, any day before I sit in the belly of a MAX.
@ju87r60
@ju87r60 3 жыл бұрын
The 330 with Buzz Lightyear I photoed at PEK in early Feb. lol
@on_transit
@on_transit 4 жыл бұрын
Alright, let’s hope they don’t copy the MCAS. I’m fine with them copying anything else.
@yichenzhang4385
@yichenzhang4385 4 жыл бұрын
Yep man,I also hate Chinese people copy our 5G tech, I think it's the reason y our gov was so angry about it. Cuz these people copy our tech,they must be banned! LOL
@cliffordnelson8454
@cliffordnelson8454 4 жыл бұрын
Will not have to use MCAS. The plane is designed for the new highest bypass engines, so it does not have to make the plane unstable to be able to fit the engines on the wings. Who knows when engines will get so big that it is hard to put them on an A320.
@muddyboots1881
@muddyboots1881 4 жыл бұрын
the profoundness of this comment is just.... profound 😂🤣
@cliffordnelson8454
@cliffordnelson8454 4 жыл бұрын
@The Mythbuster All passenger planes have pretty much looked the same except the 747.
@georgedang449
@georgedang449 4 жыл бұрын
@@yichenzhang4385 That's why we don't have 5g - you stole it from us, so we don't have it anymore. See?
@alexaltrichter1597
@alexaltrichter1597 4 жыл бұрын
Reverse engineering has always been China's way to the modern world. Air Bus and Boeing did all the R and D for them.
@donkeykong516
@donkeykong516 4 жыл бұрын
If reverse engineering is the case then why doesn’t anyone else have planes?
@alexaltrichter1597
@alexaltrichter1597 4 жыл бұрын
@@donkeykong516 It boils down to money. Large countries like China have the capital to take on projects like this. It takes millions and millions of dollars to simply copy what another country has already produced but it takes billions and billions to produce that same aircraft from the ground up. I'm not talking about tires and engines so much as the actual airframe. All the components going into an aircraft take tens of thousands of hours of testing and engineering . Reverse engineering is way cheaper. Do you think China cares about US patents or French patents. The short answer is no.
@joey-kwok
@joey-kwok 4 жыл бұрын
Just as many other emerging power in the history. When it comes to national levels, especially in a confronting situation, patent is just a joke.
@samaten521
@samaten521 4 жыл бұрын
Something which you dont do right 😄
@cliffordnelson8454
@cliffordnelson8454 4 жыл бұрын
Funny thing is that most technology is based on what China developed. And it is fine to reverse engineer a product, but you better be sure you pay for the rights to any patents you use, or develop something that is not covered by a patent. Otherwise you are open to lawsuits, and you can be certain that every inch of the plane will be checked during certification, and afterwards other companies will be looking to see if their patents were used. Why is this so hard for people to understand. They just listen to propaganda and repeat the BS without thinking.
@akie64
@akie64 4 жыл бұрын
I seriously would step on any aircraft built in china, leave it to the experts.
@reyeswang
@reyeswang 4 жыл бұрын
b737,a320 are built partly in china.
@juicemeister1984
@juicemeister1984 4 жыл бұрын
@@reyeswang production doesn't mean that the planes have chinese involvements in the design. unless china actually helped in some way of designing the plane they are only producers of a foreign product.
@4-SeasonNature
@4-SeasonNature 7 ай бұрын
Assuming the R&D cost for C919 was 20 billion dollars, the orders in China alone is about 100 billion dollars for now. That's a pretty return on the investment in addition to the value of the knowledge and skills acquired through the process.
@ajayathapa3585
@ajayathapa3585 3 жыл бұрын
do they have iso test ?
Why the Soviet wide body airliner failed? Il-86
13:44
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 266 М.
Russia And China’s Plan To Compete Against Airbus And Boeing
15:53
Long Haul by Simple Flying
Рет қаралды 355 М.
We Attempted The Impossible 😱
00:54
Topper Guild
Рет қаралды 56 МЛН
coco在求救? #小丑 #天使 #shorts
00:29
好人小丑
Рет қаралды 120 МЛН
Onboard The MADE IN CHINA Jet! Flying the Comac C919
22:10
Noel Philips
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
787 Competition: C929’s 1st Customer To Be Air China
3:53
Simple Flying
Рет қаралды 62 М.
Triple Deck Planes - Where Are They? And What Are They Like?
9:26
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН
America CAN'T Compete with China's NEW High-Speed Future!
12:53
Living in China
Рет қаралды 2,9 МЛН
Why Greenland Is So Incredibly Empty... It's Not Just The Ice
11:46
Geography By Geoff
Рет қаралды 2,3 МЛН
COMAC C919 | Claim for the future
31:44
Skyships Eng
Рет қаралды 215 М.
We Attempted The Impossible 😱
00:54
Topper Guild
Рет қаралды 56 МЛН