The Real Reason Every Airline Wants Airbus A350 Over Boeing

[@jerrypolverino6025]

A number of passengers are avoiding Boeing aircraft.

[@Anonymous-Frenchman]

You got a point, even if i dont know how filled planes need to be to generate a profit, it is possible boeing's reputation may lower their plane's profitability. For those who answers, I am no aviation expert so tell me if im wrong and why.

[@HellStr82]

@@Anonymous-Frenchman As far as i am concerned you are right. Since the 737 MAX disaster and seeing how greedy Boeing has become and how unstable their work enviromant is i avoid Boeing completly. Since the 737 MAX problem i have never took a Boeing plane and i do not plan of flying on one ever again

[@Idk18986]

Jeje defently me, I'm not risking my life to fly 35.000 ft in the air from a company that prefers to be in a good economic position than the safety of lots of people, they're shameless

[@richardchamberlain2195]

If it’s Boeing I ain’t going.

[@pentametero]

@@jerrypolverino6025 Not me. Whatever it is, preferably Boeing I'm taking it. Incidentally, the B787 is the safest plane there is... Yes! Always a Boeing fan-go to hell Calhoun et al! :-(((

[@-youngish]

Boeings falling out of the sky and having it's doors fall off should also be considered a factor.

[@thetruthbehindplanes]

no boeings have fell out of the sky since 2020

[@-youngish]

@@thetruthbehindplanes that’s not the flex you think it is.

[@-youngish]

@jimbojimbo6873 it’s not just the 737. There was the complete disaster of the Dreamliner, too. The brand is bad is my point. Quality control at Boeing is a joke right now. Customers are specifically changing flights to avoid being on a Boeing plane. So, to the title of the video’s point, there are numerous reasons airlines are avoiding Boeing right now.

[@harshmarwah4508]

I sat on max 8 just 1 month after the incident.

[@txbill2512]

@@-youngish Customers are NOT changing flights to avoid Boeing. Do you hear yourself.? Thousands are flying right now, safely I might add. Stop with the bullshit. I guess Southwest Airlines is going to out of business because "customers are changing their flights." Absolutely laughable !!!

[@kenwhitfield219]

Here is what happened. Boeing used to build airplanes to best meet airline customer requirements. Then, like McDonnell/Diuglas (McD) before the merger, Boeing started telling the airlines what they should want, a cheaper less innovative and more compromised design that was easier and cheaper to manufacture. The 787 was the last clean sheet design Boeing would invest in. Soon, the airlines would decide that like McDonald’s, Boeing was done with innovating new designs. In contrast, Airbus evolved beyond a low cost design and purposely upgraded the A350 to create a much better airplane than the 787 that better meets customer needs and wants. It is a future-proof design that makes it relevant for the longer term. While Boeing has decided that building its future on the cheap is more profitable in the short term. Which is less risky for its Wall Street investors. This strategy failed miserably for McD just as it is failing Boeing today.

[@wesellanybiz]

That’s pretty good explanation, do you think Boeing will produce a new clean sheet design in near future?

[@woob31]

That's true for soooo many American companies. And the disease has spread to Europe, with signs still to be noticed. Wall Street does not fuel the economy. It's an always hungrier parasite

[@Glen.Danielsen]

@@wesellanybiz Boeing itself has stated that no new aircraft from them is in the offing.

[@bash102]

Absolute clueless waffle you’re talking. The airlines tell the manufacturer what they want as a product! And the 787 is horse shit

[@tihomirrasperic]

@@wesellanybiz not with this management that is focused on quarterly profits instead of focusing on a 2 year cycle, they are only focused on a quarter this limits the resources and time required not only for the development of the new plane, but also for the repair of the 737MAX series And as corporate America is obsessed with "quarterly profits" there is no chance that Boeing will get out of the crisis anytime soon

[@eriktempelman2097]

The experience Airbus gained with the A380 in terms of advanced materials will surely have contributed to the smooth entry of the new A350 models.

[@soyus1297]

It did, it completely revolutionised the use of composites. The A380 also had some important lessons which resulted in certain materials not being used on the A350.

[@thetruthbehindplanes]

even the a300 used compsites.remember airbus is very bad at composites,they managed to take a tail off a a300!

[@BraddysReagent]

A380 sales wise would be a failure but it eventually boosted airbus in terms of reliability and safety which can be seen in a350 sales

[@veganbutcherhackepeter]

My brother-in-law was involved in designing parts of this aircraft. What a nice plane.

[@wadehiggins1114]

They did an Amazing job

[@midknight1978]

proud to be flying this beast. what an amazing bird

[@Aviaat1]

Sick!

[@DanielleMoren]

The a350 is popular because there is no competition in the segment. Boeings 777x is constantly being delayed and the 787 is too small in comparison.

[@BeauNieuwenhuijse]

KLM is gonna get 50 of them

[@tomosb95]

The inital A350 turned out to be the A330NEO which is not a bad seller itself, Airbus got two aircraft out of this development.

[@a21npilot91]

And A330 is an attractive option for those who want a cheap and reliable plane for medium to short haul routes while being capable of flying long haul.

[@thetruthbehindplanes]

a330neo worst plane after a340.

[@ro-86alkonost78]

@@thetruthbehindplanes Airbus should just build an A340neo and make it a twinjet. Give it more powerful engines and they might be able to build that twinjet version of A340neo.

[@Kollum]

@@ro-86alkonost78 The A330 is exactly a twin engine 340. It even have the mounts and piping in its wings to fit the third and fourth engines ! This also made it a very good base aircraft for the air-forces tankers, since you could plug the refueling stuff to an existing feature, already present even on cheap second hand passenger air-frames, no structural modification to be made for conversion ( not for that specific refueling pods topic. Other aspects of militarization do need a return to factory for mods, but not to the wings)

[@markymarknj]

The A-330 NEO made sense for those who needed something new right now, particularly if they already had A-330 CEOs in their fleet.

[@philipbrailey]

I love the A350. I’ve travelled on this aircraft many times. Simple joy. Very passenger friendly.

[@nomayor1]

Conclusion. If you design a new aircraft and you do it properly, it will both be a good product and will bring you tons of money.

[@grahamo22]

Its the XWB engine that makes the real difference. Best fuel efficiency in the world and only available on the A350. Nothing else is close - not even the Trent 1000.

[@sergten]

Airbus is doing something right. I recently flew an A321 NEO, and the thing is so quiet that I didn’t even have to use noise canceling headphones.

[@ZentimeProductions]

The A350 is even more quiet, that is very impressive.

[@akshaynyaharkar]

I take 8 flights every month for work all 2 hr or less Domestic flights and I only book with operators who only operate Airbus fleets.

[@thetruthbehindplanes]

even though boeing crashes less than cars?

[@billfraser9731]

Thanks, we need more foreigners like you. Why dont you work in India?

[@akshaynyaharkar]

@@billfraser9731 ???? Who told you I work outside India ? I work in India. 😂🤣 avg racist with presumptions

[@akshaynyaharkar]

@@thetruthbehindplanes in that case I don’t have a choice than buying a safe car and driving safely. But here I have a choice so I take precautions. Everything with Boeing is going down bad why 777x is grounded ?

[@nrajasuba6367]

Smart move. I don’t fly frequently but prefer Airbus..

[@A.M.2703]

What a plane! It's now almost everybody's favourite

[@thetruthbehindplanes]

not myn.boeing power!

[@Benjikame]

@@thetruthbehindplanes Just shut up, it your opinion not ours

[@ronparrish6666]

The 350 is the same width as the 777 not the 787 the 787 is roughly the same width as the 330 and don't fly Air Canada's 777 they have it set up for over 400 seats very tight

[@Victor-oz3zo]

And yet most of the time the A350 has a 3-3-3 layout, as has the 787. This gives the A350 far more comfortable width. The A330 has a very comfortable 2-4-2 layout, whilst having the same width as the 787. So far, Airbus is superior when it comes to passenger comfort. I will choose both Airbus types over de 787/777 any day.

[@thetruthbehindplanes]

@@Victor-oz3zo AIRLINES CHOOSE SEAT LAAYOUT,I HAVE BEEN IN 333 777s.I WILL CHOOSE BOEING OVER AIRBUS.WORST FLIGHT OF MY LIFE WAS ON A A330!!!!

[@thetruthbehindplanes]

@@Victor-oz3zo and now spirit and frontier are luxury!

[@abarratt8869]

@@thetruthbehindplanes They do, but most airlines seem to stick to Airbus’s original recommendation for seats per row. Not so for 787 or 777.

[@cathybrind2381]

@@thetruthbehindplanes My ears........

[@geerd1]

I’ll take 2 of them.

[@ringrun9872]

BOGO (French accent)

[@petermurinda1807]

Thank you sir richard banson kkkkkk

[@sorenpatriciajakobsen8841]

What you dream onboard a B787 Dreamliner is to be onboard an A350 instead - which is quieter, more spacious, has wider seats, more overhead storage space and less likelihood of some bits falling off

[@jensenene]

I flew Air Chinas A350-900 for the first time from Milan to Shanghai. Its the best airplane ever. I have flown with so many types such as Boeing ,Airbus and fokker and Mc Donell Douglas. I will try to avoid Boeing from now.

[@edwelndiobel1567]

I wont fly on the MAX. Maybe its "safe" now but the safety oversights are unforgivable.

[@williamlewandowski129]

Yes it is safe now, but it is unforgiveable that Boeing didn't design in this safety with the original 737 Max release. Boeing will never fully recover, and possibly not ever recover at all.

[@basilpunton5702]

QANTAS had already moved away from Boeing starting several years before 2022 when the B747 and the B767 were taken out of service. Already had A380 and A330 for the main fleet. Only left with B373 and B787. The B737 are getting old and need replacement, but difficult to get sufficient A321 to solve the problem. The B717 has been replaced by the A220. Jetstar which is the low cost arm is mainly a A320 operation. Now using some A321 and B787 models.

[@MrBernt1968]

Boing is going down faster than Titanic

[@thetruthbehindplanes]

well they crash less than cars...

[@pentametero]

@@MrBernt1968 Yeah right: the Titanic sank in about 2 hours and as far as I know (duh) Boeing is still going despite the free lunch at McDonalds strike.

[@gepal7914]

The updated A 350 was a catchup with the 787. And most of the benefits you mention already existed with the 787. And Boeing was planning the 777X to catchup with the size and range deficits. But, Boeing has lost their way in engineering partly due to sloppiness with the Max. So, Boeing is falling behind Airbus and Airbus is filling the gaps left in the market. If Boeing does not speed up their development and reliability, they will disappear in the commercial airline business. That will leave the market for Airbus, and whatever Chinese competitors can come along.

[@theHerathrig]

script was most probabaly written by an ai.

[@joriss5]

The delay in the 777X project is a reasons for the A350's success, as it (especially the -1000) has no true competitor available at the moment.

[@williamlewandowski129]

'Whatever Chinese competitors can come along'? COMAC 919 is here, 929 and 939 are coming. Did you see what China has done with the automotive industry - it is a massive disrupter. Expect the same with its airliners. I never ceased to be amazed by our western arrogance and self placed superiority. But that's human nature I guess.

[@evilelf5967]

The A350 program is going from strength to strength whilst Boeing seems to be on a slippery downward slope,customers are skeptical of boeing right now,as it has been well documented regarding their financial and quality issues.add into the fact that certain aircraft in their protfolio are being pushed back to later delivery...and thats where Airbus take up the slack.

[@marknelson2846]

That formation flying shot was so cool!

[@burakozc3079]

Because it doesnt fall apart in the middle of the flight.

[@TheColinChapman]

The main contributor for sure is its fuel efficiency. Especially after the russian attack on the Ukraine including the related fuel price increase, fuel efficiency overrules everything in modern aviation. Plus, the delays of the 777X program creates additional turnover for Airbus.

[@locacharliewong]

So what have happened to Cathay now?

[@drewjamila3868]

Philippine Airlines ordered i think 10 A350-1000 aircraft!

[@rdrogel1116]

If there is a GENx engine option on the A350 - it would be a big seller

[@DavidTurner-r1k]

Rolls Royce engines only.

[@ricky1231]

Boeing contributed in research and development finance for the GE 90 engine in exchange of a binding contract that GE 90 engine and all its derivatives will be exclusively be for Boeing planes. And Boeing & Mcdonald Douglas CEOs had been previous GE CEOs too.

[@cathybrind2381]

@@ricky1231 So there.....

[@MyKharli]

why is there no news on the a350 rolls royce engines ?

[@OnThaMove]

I can’t wait to get to fly on one. They look so beautiful and sleek.

[@sundeepgupta1]

The video nowhere explains why A350 was selling more than the Dreamliners…both have comparable range and fuel efficiency 😮

[@nick066hu]

Range: A350 8,700 NM vs. B787 6,330 NM and since Russia's war many routes became much longer , all need to fly around both Ukraine and Russia.

[@pentametero]

That's because the A350 is NOT out selling the AWESOME DREAMLINER. Look at sales and orders and thou will see for thy self. 😊 Duh!

[@grahamo22]

@@pentametero Apart from the fact that the Dreamliner is a lot less fuel efficient. Dreamliner sold well UNTIL the A350 came along.

[@pentametero]

@@grahamo22 A LOT less fuel efficient? What do you draw your conclusions from? Definitive statistics?

[@pentametero]

@@nick066hu I did some checking with ai and you know what: the 787 is mile per mile more efficient even though the A350 does have a greater range....

[@schrodingersjet1043]

Is the A350 the plane with a dozen restroom units all in one place, all downstairs in the belly? If so, it's worth buying just for that design. It may not sound like much, but the line moves fast and you don't have to guess which restroom will free up first. Leaves more room in the cabin for people as well. Fantastic feature.

[@hitchmille]

But does that mean less room for under-floor cargo?

[@YousefElzuhery]

I found my self coming back to your channel so I decided to subscribe keep the good work

[@Aviaat1]

Hey, Thanks man!

[@Studeb]

The only criteria I remember for international flights are, either Boeing or Airbus, wither medium, large or very large. That is it, no model names, no numbers.

[@yo2trader539]

It's much easier for any airline to order an aircraft that's already flying and has a proven track record. Many of the initial problems with the aircraft are flushed out in the first 5 years. And who knows when the 777-9 would be available. The 787 had too many design and production issues with both the aircraft and engines, and it cost the launch customer ANA a lot of money as planes needed to be frequently grounded, inspected, and components replaced. But if Boeing already had a 777-300ER NEO version available, I suspect many airlines would've simply replaced their aging 777s with modernized/updated ones. Instead many chose A350 even though it has only RR engines because it's available. There is really no negotiating with replacement time-line, so they simply couldn't wait for or gamble with the next gen 777.

[@hwkdfs]

I flew 777 and a350... The new one is much more comfortable

[@patthonsirilim5739]

boeing dosent really have twin engine wide body long hual big capacity plane that can fill the shoes of a380 and 747 gap.

[@alexlo7708]

Because the delay of 777x. Frankly, A350 fuseledges are made by Spirit Inc., the body work company of Boeing in the US. So, it is really the US tech, same as 787 body work, but wider. Without US let go for the Airbus, it cannot build 350 with in Europe tech factory.

[@nrajasuba6367]

If it’s boeing I aint going

[@dwwolf4636]

It works.

[@Fish29077]

Qantas has a large order for the A350s but it also has Boeing 787s on order in smaller numbers. Not a complete turning away from Boeing.

[@Glen.Danielsen]

Sounds like Airbus promotional video without French accent. 787 shares many of the mentioned design features. Yet I think Boeing is dying. So darn sad.

[@pentametero]

I could not AGREE MORE WITH YOU SIR! GO BOEING! GO 787 ALL THE WAY. 🎉

[@pentametero]

Boeing has a new CEO who is an engineer not a bum MBA like Calhoun. As senator Hawley said that the only problem with Boeing is you (Calhoun) and your C Suite buddies.

[@Glen.Danielsen]

@@pentametero Irrational: your comment is somehow huge good news to me. Cheers, so welcome to hear. Cheers sir. 🫡

[@Oceansta]

Flying the 737 Max soon. Wish me luck,😬 🤞🏽

[@didier7868]

Good video but It is not so "sudden" : it is well prepared in advance with airlines. 10 years in advance (look at collaboration with Emirates). It looks sudden because of the dynamic (post- covid) of the market (as you explain in fact).

[@mantan_rtw]

A350 900 and 1000 are superior to 787 8 and 9 variants in NVH. 787 is obviously better than older planes like 340, 747 and 777 but falls behind the 350 in cabin comfort.

[@jerome_morrow]

The 737? 0:30 Whoa! That might just be a bit too close to home! 😅

[@milchani]

The door windows with the fresnel lens are ridiculous. Boeing's windows are normal size and at least you can see something from them.

[@xItzSpruce]

7:13 my country Airline 💙

[@TheBESTaviationfan]

0:31 MY HEART DROPPED FOR A SECOND LOL I THOUGHT IT WAS REAL

[@AdventureswithJezza]

I’m an A350 fan but I’m pretty sure the Boeing 787 has outsold A350. I’m really curious why this is, despite all the hype for the A350

[@ricky1231]

The 787 was a revolutionary design and come to market in 2009 compared to A350 in 2015. More importantly when Boeing proposed and started designing the 7E7 program in 2003 , Airbus was slow in counter proposing a competitor of similar quality & only came up with the A350 after the A330 neo had been rejected by customers. By then the 787 order book was already overflowing. I have been on both planes several times long haul. I prefer the A350 myself.

[@AdventureswithJezza]

@@ricky1231 oh I see, do you think if they came back out at similar times; Airbus would have outsold 787. I’m curious as I still see loads of airlines use 787 compared to A350

[@ro-86alkonost78]

@@ricky1231 the reason why Airbus was slow in counter-proposing a competitor to 787 is because of their mistake. That mistake is focusing on the A380 when the 787 was also being built or conceptualized with Airbus thinking that the A380 is their game changer which turned out to be the exact opposite as it struggled to survive.

[@robertpartington1383]

The A350 is comparable to the B777, not the B787 in capacity etc.

[@Real_Beam]

@@ricky1231 tbh I've flown on them both with Qatar Airways and the 787 was quite better than A350-900 in my opinion.

[@herscheljsampson974]

Much better layout compared to the 787

[@thetruthbehindplanes]

airlines decide.the 787 is just unlucky enough to be the cattle class plane for flag carriers.

[@marcom2248]

Airbus has a huge sales agency. It's called The Boeing company. You've maybe heard of them.

[@benozzy003]

flew on this and got it was so much better than other flights i have had

[@alexandergrigorov2594]

1:16 DAL is rather the only A350 operator in America.

[@chanzanyi7194]

A350 is the best

[@CharlieMike23]

I'm interested to see how United will do with the A350

[@jeremypearson6852]

They wouldn’t have ordered it without doing their homework first. They know exactly what route it’s going to service.

[@CharlieMike23]

@@jeremypearson6852 Yeah that makes a lot of sense actually. Thanks!

[@leebenjamin5790]

Well, they probably won’t, the deliveries of the 350 is pushed back to 2030, and further deferred for multiple times and I believe they will end up cancelling it and go for the 777x

[@CharlieMike23]

@@leebenjamin5790 That's true. I think it is still possible that they take them because of United's success with the A321neo.

[@ro-86alkonost78]

But Boeing airplanes are very safe and reliable. The proof of that is Boeing says so.

[@wadehiggins1114]

😂

[@VROMVRO]

@@wadehiggins1114 🤡

[@thetruthbehindplanes]

@@wadehiggins1114has a boeing crashed since 2020

[@tennissir1986]

Yes. As long as you bring some duck tape along.

[@Aleksanderbigby]

@thetruthbehindplanes In November 2024, a DHL Boeing 737-476SF cargo plane tragically crashed in Vilnius, Lithuania. Of the four people on board, one fatality was reported. Investigations are ongoing to determine the cause of the crash, highlighting the continued importance of strict safety measures in aviation.

[@jlkeller7222]

Skip to 5:26

[@leng3001]

NOT EVERY AIRLINE IS GOING FOR IT! AMERICAN JUST CANCELED THEIR A350 ORDER AND AC MIGHT BE QUITE UNLIKELY TO ORDER IT AND ETC

[@pentametero]

Good!

[@elestromusicgamesfun1101]

Airbus backlog is crazy

[@RogierYou]

Because the Boeings are flying coffins 💀

[@albertoswald8461]

I would say something disparaging about Boeing but I have a healthy fear of "accidents"!!!😱

[@hitchmille]

🎯🤐🙊

[@OzdeDemiraz]

With the production of A350 previous A 330 version finished now nobody want to use A330 only if its so cheap people use it, its out of Age - old and primitive version very early

[@gerthenriksen8818]

The Boeing 777X looks to be an very impressive and larger aircraft than the Airbus 350. I flew with the 350 recently, but I must admit that I like the Boeing 787-9 better,

[@theHerathrig]

the script on this is bad. the 787 does almost the same thing, so why did airlines chose the a350 it does not explian it clearly, was this written by an ai?

[@matatuto6932]

Airbus is better and safer

[@astipeter]

Worst trans-atlantic flight I have ever endured. Super tight seat spacing for Lufthansa, never again!

[@dreammaker9642]

Helps the latest Boeings are ticking time bombs lol

[@nabilisur9566]

The real reason every airline wants AIRBUS A350 over BOEING ? Just like Garuda Indonesia, I wanted to Indonesian flag carrier/Indonesia's National Airlines choose on AIRBUS A350 over it's BOEING 777 for the future of longest haul flight route including European route, African route and South/North American route if it is can.

[@thetruthbehindplanes]

777 IS WAY BETTER THAN A EGGSHELL

[@jeremypearson6852]

Luckily, it didn’t become the ‘Edsel’ of the airline industry.

[@chirag28P]

I myself avoid Boeing everytime I fly

[@thetruthbehindplanes]

i fly.safer than cars

[@Oceansta]

As you must

[@toysworld8706]

Gulf Air,Saudia and Oman Air:🗿

[@thaiexodus2916]

Ultra simplified. Innovation is a loss of net revenue, only good for the long run. Cost cutting makes board members and stock holders happy. Airbus gambled on the long run, Boeing swallowed itself with greed. Then what Airbus gambled on was the apex of present commercial aircraft. Two as-good-as-it-gets engines coupled to a XWB well designed aircraft that cut no corners with the focus on extreme long range. This essentially is eating most of Boeing's market with the failed 787 and rehash of it's existing less capable or competitive aircraft. Boeing has nothing on the assembly line that competes with the A350 in fuel savings, range, and passenger capacity. More passengers and twice the range of the original Boeing 747 and almost half the fuel burn per hour.

[@thetruthbehindplanes]

787 and 777x compete

[@thaiexodus2916]

@@thetruthbehindplanes Right. 787 riddled with problems and the 777X now 5 years behind schedule and counting,

[@splender88]

Boeing tried doing things on the cheap and by doing so ruined its reputation. When flying at 35,000 feet people and airlines aren't taking any chances.

[@thetruthbehindplanes]

i will.safer than cars!

[@KayAlaam]

the introduction is false Boeing was always bigger than Airbus due to longevity and experience a350 introduction was a worthy competition after the controversy it switched the tide to Airbus

[@gretareinarsson7461]

It’s a fantastic aircraft in every way and by the most beautiful flying. All it needs now is a NEO option and a stretch one to match 777X.

[@oldcynic6964]

"NEO" - New Engine Option. Doesn't need one. Existing engines are proven and economical Stretch for 777X ? Doesn't need one. The maximum capacity for the 350-900 is 440 and for 350-1000 is 480 The maximum capacity for the 777X-8 is 384 and for the 777X-9 is 426

[@RB-pp5tv]

Safety.

[@johnopal316]

At 6:10 - > " LOWER PRESSURE ALTITUDE" ?? Higher altitude, where the pressure is lower, I don't think they meant that AI man. You want higher pressure, closer to sea level.

[@Aviaat1]

Damn youre really smart

[@AirCraftNerd208]

First comment! Also dude I was your 16th subscriber! I love your vids! Way on the way to 10K

[@Aviaat1]

Damn, 16th thats early! Thanks man!

[@AirCraftNerd208]

@@Aviaat1I’ll make sure to remind you again when you pass 100K subs

[@DlcBg]

Fuel

[@anthonylaudadio1378]

Bro airbus should buy Boeing like Mcdouglas got by boeing

[@pentametero]

That's the best laugh of them all! 😊

[@cabottaxi]

Even Emirates taking them.

[@devo3207]

Fly enough 350 business! Next

[@loicgregoire3058]

AI voice-over ?

[@moniershebeika3610]

Best plane A350

[@lucwenbourne2337]

VIVE LA FRANCE 🇫🇷

[@wolfgang.wunder]

Compare BMW to FORD and AIRBUS to BOEING and you understand why Airbus is a success. Quality/safety at its best.

[@thetruthbehindplanes]

yeah,airbus had such a good rudder design on the a300 600!weak compositing=rudder breaks off=bad situation.

[@SteveVon7]

A lot of talkin, not a lot of info

[@Aviaat1]

pay better attention then, da fuq? 🤦‍♂

[@georgH]

It's a great plane but a lousy video. "Wider" "more efficient" "quieter" "more comfortable"... Than what? "Previous generation aircrafts" What does that mean? Absolutely nothing!

[@cliocloe618]

I flew both tge 350 win big time

[@GSSurry]

Annoying background music

[@Aviaat1]

Annoying comment, don't care.

[@amfohr]

@@Aviaat1 😂

[@midknight1978]

ooooooof 😂​@@Aviaat1

[@eduardodaquiljr9637]

How do you compare in size particularly length of A350 and 777-300ER?so now you know who is genius?

[@Test.Unknown]

So many butt-hurt Airbus fanboys, always gives me a giggle.

[@ehstronghold]

Honestly like how the 777-300ER was the right aircraft for the 2010s, the A350 came at the right time for airlines looking to replace their 777-300ERs which are now over 20 years old for some airlines.

[@thetechlibrarian]

last time i flew for work i looked for a airbus

[@thetruthbehindplanes]

BOEING CRASHES LESS THAN CARS

[@thetechlibrarian]

@@thetruthbehindplanes That's fine and I know airfare is generally safer than cars however they've made some blatantly obvious shortcuts and then tried to cover it up so if I can help it when I pick my routes in aircraft I look for an Airbus if I can

[@thetruthbehindplanes]

@@thetechlibrarian well i dont want a tail falling off,and i love the engine roar,so i choose boeing.

[@Dino_person-ptfs]

you traitor airlines🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬

[@timothyseabrook1584]

it’s hardly surprising with Borings attitude to flight safety. likeshop with the B737-max 8. ehen yhe shop floor Engineers pointed how dangerous e design was msnagement said thst yhe Bottom line. is more important than flight safety. snd we had thd fiasco of the B737-max 8 giving into the gfoind dith etheopian aitlines snd yhe ses with Lion Airlines of malaydia. I might gly on a noring if its the diminyo t of the. kies though. thrte are mot msny. sirlines opersting yhrm so it looks as if ehrn Zi gly actoss ghe n pond next it eill be on an airbus. the dpscious canin of the A 350. gets my vote. it depends on if any sirline is clying actoass ghd pond ftom manchedter or Nitmingham whrn I’m ready ho go.

[@TheDavidlloydjones]

The background to this, it seems to me, is that Trump is a large, loud symbol for the idea "Everything American is stupid." Everything American is of course _not_ stupid, but enough is that the idea is easy to accept, and it rubs off unfairly on a lot of non-stupid things. At the margin it can make a difference.

[@williamlewandowski129]

Statistically speaking, the US is kind of stupid compared to our peers. Certainly there are individual brilliant people everywhere, but taken in the aggregate the US is lacking. It's not genetic, it is our disinterest in making the effort to improve our K-12 schools. As it costs $$$.