Waiting for that chemist who’ll confirm whether double Pi bonds can or can’t rotate…
@alexthedolphin0939Ай бұрын
Let me know when you find out
@Rudol_ZeppiliАй бұрын
@ Oh I will
@LmaoDed-hahaАй бұрын
Why are you using "Double" and "π" at the same time? Double bonds already include π bonds.
@Rudol_ZeppiliАй бұрын
@@LmaoDed-hahaDouble π bonds, not double bonds. Though I can see why that’s confusing, however it’s what MAKiT called them so I went with it lol.
@lotsoflambdasАй бұрын
No.
@martimoleraijaner8010Ай бұрын
Chemist here, iirc I was taught in uni that triple bonds don't rotate. With that said, since they are linear and don't offer stereoselectivity, a rotation woudnt make the molecule act any different, except maybe its IR spectra.
@MAKiTHappenАй бұрын
That is the biggest issue, because the three kinds of sources I was able to find were: 1. They do rotate 2. They don't rotate 3. It doesn't matter
@empmachineАй бұрын
@@MAKiTHappen I'll take a stab at that (I'm totally not a chemist though) 1. take polyyne, the triple bonds there could 'arguably' rotate, but only as a whole Acetylene (since it's connected by single bonds to the rest) I bet every time it "rotates' it's just another case of R-C≡C-R where the C's just rotate together. 2. Makes sense if you drop the donut thing.. I've never heard of that before.. always seen the clouds disparate. 3. Maybe since you always have one bond left over with a C≡C, it doesn't matter.. since it "effectively rotates" despite not internally rotating.. ... but again.. I just work with orgo related stuff.. not a chemist..
@dancoroian1Ай бұрын
@@empmachinejust curious as to how one comes to "work with orgo related stuff" and know as much as you seem to (enough to have an intuition about theoretical orbital behavior, anyway) _without_ being a chemist...? 🤔
@empmachineАй бұрын
@dancoroian1 sry, can't talk about work. It'll dox me and I'm blocked by an NDA too
@dancoroian1Ай бұрын
@@empmachine not looking for any specific details, just puzzled by what you meant
@FunkycorgizАй бұрын
Crazed man's rambling finally came to fruition
@chan-the-chemistАй бұрын
Chemist here. It has been shown (experimentally and through theoretical calculations) that triple bonds can rotate. This is well established in the literature, with several papers from the late 80s-early 90s on the topic. Here's an excellent source: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 6216-6229. However, to the best of my knowledge, this has only been observed in metal-metal triple bonds (interestingly, metal-metal quadruple bonds can't rotate!) As far as I'm aware, it's unknown whether carbon-carbon triple bonds can rotate. As others have mentioned, it would be impossible to detect this experimentally, so we'd have to rely on calculations of the energy barrier for the associated rotation. Also as others have mentioned, whether there is rotation about that bond or not, it doesn't matter, since sp hybridized carbons are strictly linear. This geometry isn't the same for metals however, which means that it does matter whether there is or isn't rotation, and it's why we're able to detect the rotation in the first place. Edit: I should say, though, that metal-metal triple bonds are inherently different from carbon-carbon triple bonds because of the orbitals used in bonding. In the case of metals, they're mostly using d-electrons, while carbon is using its s- and p-electrons. This is to say that metal-metal triple bonds occur from two (dxz,dyz) molecular orbital overlaps, meaning they're technically 𝛿-bonds, but are interacting in what's called "𝜋-fashion". Carbon-carbon triple bonds occur from two (px,py) molecular orbital overlaps, meaning they're true 𝜋-bonds. This is worth pointing out because these 𝛿-bonds are weaker than 𝜋-bonds, so it isn't a surprise that they're able to rotate. Again, not sure if the calculations have been done in the case of 𝜋-bonds, but my hunch is that the energy barrier would be too high for the rotation to occur.
@ohnoohgod290Ай бұрын
Excellent comment and side note at the end, I was just going to say that not all triple bonds are created equal and the distinction between pi and delta bonds needs to be made.
@AngelopommeloАй бұрын
WRONG MAKIT! I clicked because the thumbnail was indeed interesting.
@LukeWonderlich-un5ngАй бұрын
I’m taking AP chem this year and ur videos carried me through the quantum mechanics bit
@lochie2804Ай бұрын
I don't know how you're explaining it better than when I was learning chemistry in highschool
@Sem2942UwUАй бұрын
3:10 can confirm too, I use them everyday too. I have been addicted to taking in atoms since birth! That sounds unhealthy but I promise its not... Though for some reason I can not stop myself from this addiction?
@combycat4 күн бұрын
You’re not alone. I have that too. I’m not proud of it but idk.
@Kevin-im2kxАй бұрын
BRO, BEEN HOPING FOR YOU TO MAKE A VIDEO ABOUT ORGANIC CHEM FOR AGES, FINALLY MAN!
@Phoenix-ik7bmАй бұрын
The reason I clocked on this video because it's a MAKiT video.
@MarcoMa210Ай бұрын
clocked
@RavenSus101Ай бұрын
THANK YOU THANK YOU MAN🙏 you are single handedly going to save me from my finals
@ubomi.bunjaniАй бұрын
actually, the reason i clicked on this video is that i like listening to science videos while sleeping and your voice does sound good so...
@felythАй бұрын
Since the carboxylic acid group is the highest priority, the 'undecanoic acid' part is right, the aldehyde group's carbon (-CHO) is not a part of the longest chain (it is bound to a carbon that is part of the longest chain, -C-CHO), so it will be formyl... The name will be: 8-formyl-5-(hydroxymethyl)undecanoic acid.
@hristobarbolov5953Ай бұрын
Just what i was searching for 👍
@pickledragonytАй бұрын
I really love your videos! It might not seem that impressive, sometimes, when you explain all the concepts, because they're understood easily. But that's exactly why you're amazing, you explain stuff in such a simple Vsauce way, step by step, so that basically anyone can understand complex stuff by the end of the video. I wish you the best of luck, and also, how in the hell do you make videos like this in such a short time? Like, I can get the animations, but all the investigation?? It's crazyy!
@MAKiTHappenАй бұрын
I don't quite know what to say, thank you so much for this comment I really appreciate it
@pickledragonytАй бұрын
@@MAKiTHappen of course, I really appreciate your channel, and will share it with some people. Yeah, trying not to die is a pretty good motivator. The state of KZbin is pretty sad nowadays, but whatever. You're making an amazing project, that is really appreciated, and I hope the channel keeps on growing. Bye, gotta hit the gym now!
@norlieghАй бұрын
Hi Makit! Thank you for making chemistry fun. I hope you make more chemistry videos. I understand more from this than I ever did in school. ❤
@Cody-yx6tcАй бұрын
You are a great teacher. Good sense of humor among complex concepts. Easy subscribe
@blnkz4988Ай бұрын
How you made a video in a week?
@MAKiTHappenАй бұрын
Desperation and complete lack of sanity
@usm1leАй бұрын
@@MAKiTHappen dudes its insane to me because usually with animations like this youtubers would take like 3 months at least
@RavenSus101Ай бұрын
@@MAKiTHappen😅after seeing the server i can understand😂
@alexthedolphin0939Ай бұрын
voodoo magic
@flaym.Ай бұрын
I did end up asking a couple other chem people about the triple bond thing and the general consensus is that it doesn't rotate - I think the donut thing was from a specific context (spectroscopy) where you're assuming delocalised electron density because the entire bond rotates freely
@Monika-pt1rgАй бұрын
I clicked on the video to help you pay rent!
@spacepython_10 күн бұрын
I sure love downloading Principia Mathematica, editing a random character, and spreading it online!
@capitanes_de_los_juegosАй бұрын
1:43 dude I didn't expect Makit with a long arm wtf
@mungelomwaangasikateyo376Ай бұрын
That was a phenolmenal joke 😂😂😂
@Outofpocket2dАй бұрын
Toughness.. i saw that beautiful word in your charity checkup the other day
@a_person1226Ай бұрын
Organic chem was a topic I hyperfixated on a couple years ago which really helped this year when I took year 12 chemistry because I had already gotten used to all the naming conventions The only A+ I got in chem (I suck at inorganic chem lmao) (also just a sidenote, the textbook 'an introduction to organic and biochemistry' by William H Brown is really well written and a great organic chem resource)
@thatdogcanexplode5734Ай бұрын
"when I showed it to someone who knows a thing or two about organic chemistry" you mean Dr Flaym?
@MAKiTHappenАй бұрын
Flaym was busy becomming a literal dr, it was pharmamane
@CT-sixesАй бұрын
As it is rules since I follow, I see MAKiT upload, I click and then I am gonna get confused and fascinated at the same time.
@Frddy_-sh8soАй бұрын
Chemistry time
@rafa_br34Ай бұрын
0:54 that was.. unexpected.
@Flesh_WizardАй бұрын
14:26 Ah yes, the spell tome of fireball🔥🔥🔥
@Frddy_-sh8soАй бұрын
Ah yes , my third Abitur Subject
@AlexGao0702Ай бұрын
Organic chemistry my beloved
@officeryoda5262Ай бұрын
If I were you, I wouldn’t try to upload every week. The videos you produce are of such high quality, and that’s what makes them stand out. Don’t sacrifice that. Uploading 1-3 times a month is more than enough.
@hristobarbolov5953Ай бұрын
16:19 The IUPAC name should be 2-formylbutanenitrile
@felythАй бұрын
I want an explanation how he got "2-methal-butyronitrile" lol, students taking organic for the first time don't mess that up... Anyway, thank you for catching that, I must've missed it skipping forward.
@MAKiTHappenАй бұрын
That's the "couple notable asterisks" I skipped over
@PinkiDay-n1tАй бұрын
Your animation is so amazing and your talking stylish so amazing and iconic bro
@georegio26 күн бұрын
I hope your fridge gets fuller
@edgardodeleon7058Ай бұрын
A pi bond can theoretically rotate but it takes too much energy to make that transition since you are reaching a state where the bond is basically broken (when its adjacent and not parallel) which just has a ton of potential energy that it’s unlikely to form. A triple bond may help reduce the energy needed for that rotation since it has another pi bond that is also horizontal but it may also require a bit more energy to break two bonds now. We typically dont assume rotation in triple bonds since they are linear and you could only see it in more special systems.
@pietrotettamanti3183Ай бұрын
@@edgardodeleon7058 that's not how it works
@edgardodeleon7058Ай бұрын
@ oh no D:
@averageenjoyer8777Ай бұрын
Makit what were you doing before youtube? Also love your videos
@pentasquare2 күн бұрын
Goddam. I just realised how overwhelming this must be for beginners.
@sweetysureka1573Ай бұрын
Helloo so I am a JEE aspirant and I honestly love chemistry and these chemistry videos of your never fail to spark my interest during these stressful times! Thank you so muchh
@RyanisthereАй бұрын
i like your funny words magic man
@ThxForCakeАй бұрын
gimme that epic science content daddyMAKiT
@jayypooltonАй бұрын
And he delivers again. Great work makit
@alian71411 күн бұрын
2:36 it should be clarified that bonds store energy, which is why CH4 burns to release it, saying that adding H is like relaxing a compressed spring is a weee bit unintuitive I get that the analogy is probably to explain the stability of CH4 at rest position haha so possibly unintended
@Darklait4 сағат бұрын
Ngl for you to Only have 50k subscribers is crazy for this quality
@hafixionАй бұрын
11:02 Hey, you know the name methamphetamine is a bit more nuanced than that. That name is a shortening of N-methyl-amphetamine (iirc, not a chemist myself) which is because there is a methyl group attached to the nitrogen (N). It isn't a funny coincidence, it's what makes meth meth and not Adderall
@Richard-rk1ruАй бұрын
Yes. And the naming scheme continues further. So you can try to ask for some ethamfetamine for example. So there will be 2 carbons on nitrogen.
@hafixionАй бұрын
@@Richard-rk1ru True, although my intuition tells me that it would lose its effect, just a hunch tho
@Richard-rk1ruАй бұрын
@@hafixionThe fluorated ones are hit or miss. 3fea is great for example. Not sure about normal ea tho
@hafixionАй бұрын
@@Richard-rk1ru Is that because the F resembles an OH? I've always been curious about that with some drugs
@Richard-rk1ruАй бұрын
@@hafixion Yeah could very well be. I can't think of any pair of molecules I had that I could use for a direct comparison. But yeah these group look alikes are exploited fairly often. 2C-B has been banned for quite some time now. So was it's brother 2C-E (the bromine is replaced by an ethyl group, small change but it's quite a unique compound all together) And then there is the new 2C-EF that has the added fluoride on the ethyl group and voila this fluorated ethyl group seem to be closer the bromine's electro static potential is thus the closest replacement for 2C-B that we have right now.
@MrBlaze2126Ай бұрын
Cool the video came just before taking on organic. Talk about the timing!
@sedatev7341Ай бұрын
I'm actually currently learning organic chemistry in school and I can confirm it's significantly more fun than electrochemistry.
@MTSUChemistry26 күн бұрын
We need an animated Diels-Alder 😮😮😮
@hrishikeshaggrawalАй бұрын
12:44 you messed up. The group is popping up way after THIS is said.
@MithrralАй бұрын
Alright fine, I’ll join your patreon.
@qwertykeyboard5015Ай бұрын
oh hey, makit did it in time
@Error422win18 күн бұрын
Methanium has given this man trauma what did it do?
@Animaxv9Ай бұрын
This is like a one shot speed up to 2x, a good ride if you know the concepts he talks abt,
@TheSpoonThatDiedАй бұрын
Makit, i think you're losing sanity from studying chemistry.. Honestly, relatable :]
@TheEliteMan723Ай бұрын
Time to learn chemistry ig
@Aman-b5kАй бұрын
Thank you so much mate, I'm a student who's pursing chemical engineering in india🇮🇳✨, and i find your content amazing af, hope you'll reach 100k asap! 🩷Best of luck love from india 🇮🇳
@capitanes_de_los_juegosАй бұрын
I still cant get over "sigma" being a thing used well before the meme yet it still making me laugh
@the_skywalker644Ай бұрын
Chemistry, the study of exeptions
@BrunoSantos-bt2bk18 күн бұрын
12:45 Why is the main chain name the first thing here in this example, but in the second example it is on the end?
@simmyfeldbum2878Ай бұрын
Great visuals
@hello_person_wathing_beatSaberАй бұрын
Makit is cookin with the vids
@ianthegamer5894Ай бұрын
Yo its so late why cant i be in a different time zone, I should be asleep and ready for school
@Ema9ineАй бұрын
Same
@INADEQUATEDUCKSАй бұрын
Who needs sleep when you have Makit
@sobertillnoonАй бұрын
It really was option 3 for me.
@MeInsideTheBoxАй бұрын
PhD quantum chemistry student here. I'll take a stab at it. I think it should rotate. Take the simplest case, acetyline. Its pi-ring is comprised of four p-orbitals, and it's perfectly symmetrical around the C-C axis, so the bonding eigenstates of the pi-ring must be degenerate (have the same energy). When you tack on new groups, the symmetry, and thus, degeneracy, lifts. But, unless there is significant interaction with the pi-ping (neighboring sp2 or sp-carbons), the difference in energy remains very small. This energy, difference, I think, should be on the order, if not smaller, than that for rotation around a sigma-bond. That is to say, it should freely rotate at all temperatures except near absolute zero.
@MeInsideTheBoxАй бұрын
Now I'm waiting for your video on eigenststes so people understand what I'm saying, lol
@IceyWeeniАй бұрын
I’m sold
@RodLanDiazАй бұрын
I think that if you add Nomenclature somewhere in the title, you can get a lot more views from students looking it up!
@sifi3638Ай бұрын
My brother in humanity, Try to learn morphing animations it will help your videos have a flowy feeling instead of static and harsh experience, and i appreciate your love and enthusiasm for Knowledge and Understanding. Keep it up ❤
@HatzmcdoofАй бұрын
Thoughness.
@aAtom596Ай бұрын
I found the thumbnail interesting!
@slyfoxblox29 күн бұрын
I clicked on the video because I wanted to watch your newest video. Didn’t even read the title.
@timhaase903027 күн бұрын
wasnt the ending -al for CHO not only O? reagarding 14:00
@MarkosFFFFАй бұрын
I was wondering if the molecule you numbered was correct, but i can't seem to find sources for your friend's naming of said molecule. I am not that well-versed in organic chemistry, but i have some questions. I'm sure this is just an editing mistake, but you kept saying decanoic acid instead of undecanoic acid, which was shown on screen. Secondly, from what i could find, a ketone group is indicated by just "oxo"; no need for methyloxo. When naming the methyl substituent with a hydroxyl group, it should actually be hydroxymethyl, not methylhydroxy, even though i have seen it in simplified versions of IUPAC names. I'm pretty sure this isn't standard IUPAC naming, but as I said, I am not that knowledgeable on the subject.
@proccessingunit2337Ай бұрын
Am I wrong or is that thumbnail a THC molecule
@dancoroian1Ай бұрын
9:51 why oh why did you use a drop shadow for this... 🤦🏻♂️
@theredrighteye4380Ай бұрын
Bro you are saving me
@fuzzycheeseАй бұрын
Look at the isomerization of cis-retinal in the eye to 11-trans retinal. The way our eyes interact with light is via a pi-bond temporarily breaking for free movement then reforming. They cannot rotate otherwise, nor can triple bonds. Also the different models of atomic structure you mention are called valence bond theory and the molecular orbital model. They are both used at the same time by most modern chemists as molecular orbital theory explains non structural properties like magnetism while VB theory is straightforward fot understanding structure
@fuzzycheeseАй бұрын
You should also show hybridisation and Lewis structures before moving onto skeletal formulas as they illustrate stereochemistry and 3D geometry better
@Bennett5-x7pАй бұрын
Great Video.
@FunkycorgizАй бұрын
Fact
@edward1259Ай бұрын
Man, I love being a liberal arts major. Mostly philosophy courses. Weirdly enough, I love chemistry (and o-chem) a lot. Guess I am really messed up in the head, huh?
@VernWaybrightАй бұрын
cool, thanks!
@runaveersiddhiАй бұрын
a casual nine year old watching stuff that is for university students
@QSBraWQАй бұрын
what is happening...
@ineedabettername1Күн бұрын
👍👍
@SixToughАй бұрын
This feels like physics to me 😂 are you a physicist by profession?
@MAKiTHappenАй бұрын
No, but physics is the field I know best
@m9l0m6nmelkior711 күн бұрын
13:00 sorry to bother but… this isn't ethane anymore, you have to look at the longest carbon chain ! This would be something like… methyloic-butandioic acid ? I don't really know how to name a methanoic acid side groupe… it's a kinda strange molecule you have there, but it's not an ethane derivate ! Ethanoic acid (= acetic acid) is H3C-COOH not H3C-CH2-COOH, that would be propanoic acid !
@Aayuuush721Ай бұрын
The lack of music in the chains section is off putting lol
@alian71411 күн бұрын
11:43 lmao
@rishanraaj7367Ай бұрын
Yeahh...
@ibi_DoesAlot11 күн бұрын
nice video
@thebeardman7533Ай бұрын
Oh no not the chemistry interpretation of orbitals and atoms not have function oh no that doesnt seem right to me i mean physics is better wht this long nami g convention just add subscrpits like physics does when you need to name something
@ГалинаСавельева-с7иАй бұрын
Keep going🎉🎉🎉
@arthurstb1749Ай бұрын
CH5 is stable under hight pressure like at the bottom of ocean ☝️🤓
@niik8790Ай бұрын
Nice video
@frenzygaming1Ай бұрын
Wish you had more reach 😔
@BooLightningАй бұрын
great video bro
@ashhadshahzad6200Ай бұрын
I WAS IN THE VIDEO MOM GET THE CAMERA
@ArpeggioTenorАй бұрын
YAY ANOTHER MAKiT VIDEO YEAAAAAAAAAAH!
@larchonte28425 күн бұрын
1:50 can you speak slower ? sometime it's hard to understand.
@Compact_ReactorАй бұрын
The Thumbnail and Title don't match...?
@Sanjay_Narayanan28 күн бұрын
Bro I'm in a hurry, tell me How to predict the chemical reactions of organic chemistry ( when reactants and medium given) ... i know you can find a simple way to do so... afterall its just carbon, hydrogen, oxygen atoms, they are simple, you can MAKit
@MAKiTHappen28 күн бұрын
That's actually the topic of the next chemistry video so... just wait like... 15 days... How much in a hurry are you?