The Sim Playerbase is Ruthless - War Thunder

[@notnurfcreanga]

"to make sure that sim players do not teamkill, we are going to make matches be historically accurate when it comes to nation's sides- anyway heres a french mirage from blufor in the redfor china tt- oh oh and a mig29 in the italy tech tree! uhhhh phantom in the german tt too!"

[@networkgeekstuff9090]

Dont forget the MIG21 bison in British tree to completelly screw up visual ID for you.

[@notnurfcreanga]

@@networkgeekstuff9090 no not really, its at such a high br its the only mig21 at that battle rating, therefore trough the the method of solo elimination its the indian one

[@wt_joystick_ace]

@notnurfcreangathe MiG-29 RWR ping throws me off when I’m playing red tho 😂

[@notnurfcreanga]

@ semi related but russian rwrs suck soo much more when compared to nato rwrs nato: enemy in x direction, y distance in z vehicle russia: to the general left........ theres.... _something_ ....

[@102ndsmirnov7]

@notnurfcreanga In real life the Soviet RWR is actually preferred by a lot of people including myself since it gives you accurate direction AND signal strength so you can judge the distance of the threat. Which to me is more important than knowing what plane the threat is.

[@yono367]

I firmly believe this game needs a health patch, update the game modes, fix a bunch of bugs, add some quality of life etc.

[@turbrojewk]

Yes. Realistic battles and sim battles need some help

[@nolanwaddill8472]

I was just thinking about that today. I think beyond the big summer and December updates, this entire year should be dedicated to fixing the many major issues with the game to revitalize the main game modes. Add some older planes that have been skipped as new content and this would aid them in delaying the inevitable endgame of the addition of 5th Gen fighters (god help us I hope it’s at least winter 2026 before those come)

[@Azuula.]

We all know that’s not gonna happen atleast for a very long time

[@ep42089]

New modes

[@SternVonAfrika]

bro, that's main thing the game has been in the dire need of since patch 1.27 back in 2013

[@squarelepper]

Imo the mistake the snail made was adding longer range armaments and planes without increasing map size, adding faster jets without upgrading airfield AA

[@gamingrex2930]

We will get to a point where you can instantly lock on stuff the moment you spawn

[@BlackWolf9988]

​@@gamingrex2930 i hate to break it to you but we are already at that point.

[@squarelepper]

@gamingrex2930 already there man, Strike Eagle can lock and launch all from end to end on the smaller maps

[@Warthunderatbad]

Tommy slings missiles

[@Ethan-fz6tp]

if you are getting hit from cross map missiles, you just need to learn how to avoid them.

[@WirableCrown1]

Here is some Proper Sim Etiquette for anyone not in the know 1.) If an ally pings the map, the proper response is to use the “Follow me” radio command. This shows you on the map and your altitude is attached to the message. This tells them if the plane they see is an ally or enemy. 2.) If you see a plane, ping the map close to its location and wait for your teammates to do #1. Don’t forget to return the favor and also use the Follow me radio message.

[@BlackWolf9988]

This but use "cover me" instead.

[@WirableCrown1]

@ has it changed? Used to be the Follow me, but I haven’t played in a while. The cover me was used if you actually needed help. Again it’s been a while I might be out of date

[@nicolasgibbons4683]

@@WirableCrown1it changes every time for me, sometimes it’s follow me sometimes guide on me but regardless it pings your grid square and altitude and is something you should be doing a lot. As you get to top tier, radars and IFF start to filter it out for you but below 13.0 you ought to be careful. Sometimes it’s fun to get close and gunfight anyway

[@commodorejones8044]

@@BlackWolf9988 That then gives the impression that cover is needed, in a situation where it's not. Didn't take me long to start ignoring that call out from one player while I was in sim.

[@commodorejones8044]

@@WirableCrown1 Not to my knowledge, no. Marking ones own location, during a patrol, has always been follow me.

[@SimplySinful]

Vertical Notch: Exists Enemy AIM-120: Wait, WHAT?? WHAT HAPPENED? WHERE DID HE GO? WHO AM I? I DON'T KNOW WHERE I AM!!!

[@GotsHank]

the missile knows where it is at all times

[@CPUfy]

@@SimplySinful So true Sinful

[@stallfighter]

Shoudnt it switch to pulse (and get chaffed lol)?

[@spray916]

The Flankophile.

[@64Mustang]

As a victim of said vertical notch.... can confirm. In the right hands, in the right plane, basically unbeatable.

[@MoonBoyChar]

at around 16:42 when you talk about giving the red team equipment thats actually good i got reminded of when the polish pilots went from flying early monoplanes with the wings still above the cockpits and having to fight the newest 109s and still scoring victories to flying the spitfires in the 303rd and absolutely abusing the now on par or even worse 109s with the tactics that they came up with while still flying the monoplanes

[@PvtPartzz]

Every War Thunder sim player needs to play Nuclear Option’s Escalation game mode and fully grasp how much better EC could be if it followed their lead.

[@SA80TAGE]

not until they add vr support

[@gabenfy1021]

​@@SA80TAGEthere is vr in wt i only play sim with vr and joystick & throttle

[@Сталкер-ь2х]

amateurs, dcs exists by the way

[@A-Warthog-cc1wm]

@@Сталкер-ь2х DCS doesn't model radar or missiles as well as warthunder lmao

[@Сталкер-ь2х]

@@A-Warthog-cc1wm im still waiting for wt to model rio on f14, wso on f15e and cpg on apache when? ah yes what about that sms and datalink functionality on a10c, that allows for a wing to coordinate and mark targets for each other? ka50 datalink maybe? jtacs? when will that be modeled in war thunder?

[@xiphias_4124]

And heres me a humble ground tanker learning that gaijin still ignors hard evidence that something is wrong with a vehicle and just says nope we are right you are wrong. great vid, it was cool to see that the sim players have their own struggles and how gameplay feels.

[@souptime288]

Tbf classified documents got leaked for the typhoons engine and all gaijin said was they were exaggerating for marketing, it's not just ground that suffers from this

[@DraconixDG]

I honestly couldn't play top tier sim because I just suffer from a chronic skill issue so I always get cooked and get farmed for kills

[@Farl3x]

Insane

[@YoRHaUnit2Babe]

I'm sorry

[@DraconixDG]

@@YoRHaUnit2Babe what are you sorry for? I am just bad at sim, no need to apologize for my own problems

[@PickledPear1017]

Keep practicing brotha !!!

[@ДонныйАдмирал]

Coke back, we need food

[@Kenedienz]

Warthunder sim is the definition of: "Its not the plane, Its the pilot."

[@josephstalin8684]

Air & Ground RB normie here, I had no idea this was happening in the sim side of war thunder. This was very well layed out and came with plenty of context. It was really cool to see a side of war thunder that I haven't been able to get into even after nearing 6000 hours in this game.

[@Real_Claudy_Focan]

Another youtuber, when speaking about DCS and WT said this ; "DCS players know how to fly, WT players knows how to kill"

[@Shoppincart]

have u seen growling sidewinder channel? That guy knows how to fly AND kill in DCS

[@Gemm6905]

@@Shoppincart You're not entirely wrong, he's pretty good but most of his content is vs AI and with PVP content he usually has an opponent who isn't as experienced.

[@snowchi2792]

​@@ShoppincartGS isn't a great dcs player, mediocre-ish in terms of the wider community. the original comment just seems stupid to me, you use all the skills you use in wt in dcs plus many more to secure kills, it's a higher skill ceiling game with a shitton more you can do in fights, dcs players certainly "know how to kill" better than wt players because there's more things, weapons, systems etc involved in doing so.

[@TheDAWinz]

@@snowchi2792 Yea man I love when my missiles lose to a RNG diceroll anytime someone uses the countermeasure button in DCS. Also the average DCS player is pretty bad, much worse than the average WT player.

[@snowchi2792]

@@TheDAWinz me when I pull up the one thing that's simulated better in WT: and no, most war thunder players have nowhere near the level of knowledge in general aircraft performance (a decent example of one of many things being ideal rate speeds, do you know how few wt players know this stuff outside of comp duellists?). War thunder is easier to play than dcs, don't mistake that for WT players being better at flying than DCS players.

[@monferno204]

I like those 8 v 2 matches Lots of targets to hit, especially if youre both on comms lol

[@CPUfy]

Great Work Nimbal: Another excellent video and definitely worth the wait

[@pouletbidule9831]

how do you do the emogi

[@CPUfy]

@ you can only do it on PC

[@pouletbidule9831]

@CPUfy

[@bigtony4930]

People really believe that skill matters here? Gaijin added long range, beyond-visual-range weaponry and didn't even ATTEMPT to make the maps big enough for them.

[@Mibarri]

I dont have this experience of blue winning every time. When blue is out numbered or evenly matched, blue gets stomped. That's been my experience in top-tier sim. The maps are way to small for these types of aircraft. Edit: I hate Clouds.

[@Farl3x]

@@Mibarri that's because, the average blue player is worse than the average red side player, so when red and blue fave each other, with evenly jets, blue side is going to get stomped

[@Mibarri]

@Farl3x if that's the case. How does blue win so much as this video claims? I don't play top tier too much anymore because of my experiences vs. red. The planes, imo are just better, and there are far more options for play style on red, whereas blue, it's pretty much just amraam spamming. The mig29 is the only plane I would consider terrible for red. So I play mostly 11.3 - 12 now, and there has been a very large shift. Red is winning more in that tier, which didn't use to happen. It's odd. I think the mirage going on sale plays a huge hand in it. It's all I fight now. F4s vs. Mirage seems to be what I see most now.

[@102ndsmirnov7]

The clouds are just awful. Every single match for the past months has had these same incredibly dense and low clouds. Makes everything feel the same. Clouds are cool but they should be an occasion, not a constant.

[@Mibarri]

@102ndsmirnov7 agreed

[@Chieftian101]

@@Mibarri I mean, the F-4S has an actually reliable SARH missile unlike the MF1C, and I doubt the F1C has a better radar than the F-4S from my experience, the main advantage the Mirage has is superior playerbase and 2 superior but very short-range IR missiles. edit: also the main point the video is making is that the red playerbase had to improve a whole lot more in order to win, which they did, the gap between the AMRAAM and r77 combined with the radar and FM gap forced them to get better. Just because the US playerbase has better stuff doesnt mean they will win more (though I am quite sure they still won more stat wise), It meant that the red side had to play better to get their wins. So when they got their hands on equal/superior jets, it became a beatdown between mediocre players in now avg jets vs much better on avg players with avg or better jets. BR wise, 11.3-12.0 has some amazing blufor aircraft and some really annoying ones, the Tornado F3, A-10C, and F-4S are all great, the main russian/german/french jets in that range are the Mig-23s and Mf1C, and this is an old matchup.

[@meferswift]

i think they need an assigned mission. especially to lure in RB player. maybe i want to partake in an attack mission with some basic protection by either player or bots in number

[@Blanchboi]

24:05 "What does the US have left to add?" I'm going to exclude the F-22A because that definitely is not a fair addition at this point in time. Even at the end of the year I doubt the F-22 would be fair, but Gaijin is Gaijin. We don't know whether they'll be willing to take such a massive leap or not. Not to mention the Su-57 and F-35s can come for other nations, which is a whole other can of worms I don't want to discuss here. There are a few major planes we can see before the F-22A though: 1.) F/A-18C Legacy Hornet - (won't change much tbh) 2.) F/A-18E/F Super Hornet - (also won't change much tbh) 3.) F-15EX - (this is where things actually get interesting) The only plane that actually could bring something to the US side is the F-15EX. Not only does it get better flight performance (new engines + FBW), it also gets 4 more missiles (excluding the double racks that were tested on the F-15C). The Hornets honestly won't bring much to the table outside of "true" SPAMRAAM - carrying 10 and 12 AMRAAMs respectively on the C and E/F (iirc). They both struggle with speed but have good AoA, so we'll have to see how Gaijin does things with them. Like you mentioned, a FBW rework would be a very interesting change - especially for the EF and F-16.

[@specc_s1452]

Raptor would be fair if they add ECM and more advanced variants of 4.5 gens

[@Blanchboi]

@@specc_s1452 As much as I want ECM and the F-22 to come to the game, I wouldn't expect the F-22 to come without proper counters. If anything, I wouldn't be surprised if we got the F-35 before the F-22 for the sake of all other nations getting stealth equivalents.

[@FlyBoyJo1994]

Not to mention the early jet fighters and jet bombers of the 1950’s and 1960’s. B-50D and B-36 being two really cool options.

[@Allstar-yl1ek]

@@Blanchboi Not sure how much difference there would be between adding an F-22 and an F-35 on the stealth front. While the F-22 is definitely _more_ stealthy, they're both basically invisible to most of the radar sets in game at the moment. Then again, the F-117 is in the game and Gaijin barely seems to have scuffed the radar absorbent paint or something.

[@acescionti711]

Do yourself a favor. Look up F-16 XL

[@jacobbaumgardner3406]

And it’s STILL not modeled properly. Cmon, Gaijin.

[@yannicksibilly]

To be fair, the fun part in WT is playing with prop planes. No radar, no missiles. Just you, your eyes, your skill and a good strategy. In case WT wants us to play top tier jets in sim, we need bigger maps and more objectives. Not clouds going from 0 to 6k+ km in altitude. I do have fun playing the Sea Vixen, but top tier jets are just a pain in the a**. I don't really like the fact that I have to hug the deck so tight that I'm fighting jets and the ground at the same time.

[@Stealth86651]

The problem is that Warthunder just isn't close to a simulator. Yes it has a lot of detail and controls, but it's still a buggy, arcadey mess where a lot of aircraft have been broken or inaccurate for years. Bottom line is either Gaijin as a company refreshes their entire leadership, or they'll just continue to do as little as possible to keep farming the kids parents wallets.

[@sbeve99]

11:55 So you are telling me, that these idiots at gaijin really looked at the T-10-1's stats and stuff, and was like: yeah this looks like a Flanker-B so it must be one okay and used it as a base? Shiver me timbers, just imagine if these lazy bastards would have looked at the P-42 first not the T-10. P-42 weight, aerodynamics etc. but you get the radar and missiles lmao. But one thing is using wrong data and other is denying a shitload of other data that prooves you wrong. And after all this they were like: uhh oppsie daisy haha This is the most gaijobbles thing ever.

[@Signal228]

for me sim battles are a fun one time experiences, sometimes I come back to them and get a shit ton of sl and rp not even doing almost anything

[@adriancoric1721]

the fact that it took a year (or you could say since the flanker was added exactly 1 year ago in the december update air superiority) to buff the flanker just goes to show how long russia had to suffer with that god awful flight model. Where as when the f16 arrived they fixed it immediately as soon as the US mains start crying. If this buff came earlier id definetly be playing the flanker more but they decide to buff it right as they add some of the best fighers coming from europe. I hope a new flanker variant is coming soon to balance the situation out a bit as well as a new US plane so they can stop whining. btw im not a russia main i just hate to see obviously underperforming vehicles having to suffer when there obvious evidence that theyre better than that and need a buff.

[@railfan8444]

I stopped playing around the time of the F-15C. Honestly at this point I'm kind of glad. I miss playing sim but I don't miss playing War Thunder

[@asadchatha4184]

Personally I've been having a lot of fun Grinding out the F15J Sneaking through to the mountains to bomb bases in Afghanistan like its a "Head-Hunter" mission from HALO. Dodging the Tryhard hordes by turning the radar off and sticking to sneak attacks. In my experience if there are 3 good players and the Map allows it, you can easily flip the cards on the enemy by tilting them into leaving by sticking to sneak attacks and attrition.

[@explosivecommando9100]

How much rp do you get with that strat?

[@Past10Performance]

​@@explosivecommando9100rp is capped in sim you dont get more from any strat you just hit the max and thats it

[@airlightshockZOV]

I think the Su-30SM shouldve come this last update, with the F-18s, to balance out the whole game as honestly, RB isnt doing much better

[@NsK363]

Actually, from what I see these days, the winning team is team that has France on their side. Not Eurofighters. Rafale is such a BEAST in SIM

[@jediknight1294]

I mean its realistic because Nato air was better

[@GeneralLee2000]

Now imagine once they implement the TWS for the IRST that they said they're adding in the future as well... that, plus the 6 9Ms seems like it would be really gross in sim

[@nimbal3304]

@@GeneralLee2000 oh they are.. on the flat maps like the Sinai they're more effective than AMRAAM's

[@zenki_ls400]

i think if USSR get the SU-30SM with R-77-1 and R-73M the US should just skip the legacy Hornet and jump straight to the F/A-18E Super Hornet with the AIM-9X and AIM-120C to bridge the gap between the SU-30SM since i doubt the F-15E will perform on par with it maybe we could see a modernized F-16C and F-15C with better radars and electronics and weapons but i feel the Super Hornet is the better bet for now since the others will literally just be the same jets but modernized and people have been wanting a Hornet variant for a long time

[@M0LOCK]

Pretty sure if 9X come we will be seeing R74s, IRIS-T,MICA IRs and PL10s.....

[@СергейНикольский-я2ц]

Devs said that they won’t add 77-1/77M/73-1/74/74M/37/37M or any other Russian missile any time soon so the Su-30SM will carry the same missiles as the Su-27SM. On the other hand back in the days gjn said that they will never add rank 8 prems and then, just 0.5 years later, they added 3 or 4 rank 8 prems

[@hemendraravi4787]

@@СергейНикольский-я2ц they never said anything about r73m , r37 ,r27ea ( i dont think we will get r27ea as its a prototype missile).

[@hemendraravi4787]

r73m is aim9m-10 equivalent , not 9x equivalent , if you add 9x then they need to add r74m.

[@СергейНикольский-я2ц]

@@hemendraravi4787 have you watched Russian dev streams? They said that they don’t plan to add any other missiles to Russian/Soviet jets any time soon

[@FlyBoyJo1994]

Subscribed. I’ve played sim for events but I find it more relaxing and enjoyable. My only gripe is that it costs more to spawn a TT vehicle than a premium.

[@Professor_Ramen]

first sim game with the su27sm, i got killed 13 seconds exactly after taking off

[@ZackSavage]

If the F-15EX comes, I will need to practice and learn Sim.

[@play_dude192]

For people saying Su-27 is bad, you should try J-11A. This is a biggest crap on top tier. No RWR, no radar, and it's even heavier that basic su-27. EF2K and Rafale just ruin it with no chances.

[@funwithmagnus8570]

I didn't touch Sim until I got the Su27. First match I did in Sim I got 3 kills and it turned out great and we won. I was thinking, "wow this easy." Lost the next 12 or so in a row and haven't touched it since lmao.

[@mattgoodwin2914]

the sim games ive been playing recently make me almost wish we could have a Eurpoe vs the world nation set up that way we could have a bit of a change

[@SA80TAGE]

we need DCS to hurry up with that world map, then we can setup up that scenario. Just take note, Scotland is MY airspace! XD

[@Aerospace911]

Warthunder players meet DCS realism

[@Storlans]

Now the gripen is left behind instead after many nerfs.

[@Kunomi334]

Being someone who has been playing sim for years I have been very happy with the recent changes in terms of balance yknow some matches stay full for both sides but the reason I have just been not playing is like you said the lack of content, i love doing air superiority but at the same time there are many things that these aircraft can do that you really can’t do in the current build of sim I want interdiction targets, manpads, or a special target I need to use a nighthawk for yknow something to really sort of bring variety

[@invertedv12powerhouse77]

We need new modes. Like a gun fight only mode, or a close range only mode with no bvr missiles.

[@fdenrico9861]

As a Su-27 player, I always play matches that either France in the Redfor, or the rare All-Country mix-up match, because other than that, the balance would shift to Bluefor too much for Redfor to do anything I also recently got the Su-27 so idk how it performs before it receive its buff, but so far it's been enjoyable flying experience! Of course the radar is the one thing i'm having issue with, but with notching & multipathing, it's still doable/survivable, I always rely on the ACM & IRST anyway to launch R-73 lol

[@102ndsmirnov7]

Ngl at this point with how outmatched the Russians are with missiles in-game it's better to just go with the smaller faster MiG-29 which also has a better radar and use ERs or ETs, R-77 is useless.

[@fdenrico9861]

@@102ndsmirnov7 hmm i kind of have to disagree, i never flown the Mig-29SMT in air SB before (only flown the Mig-29 before the SMT), but i noticed that there's a huge difference in the amount of missiles you can bring per sortie between the Fulcrums and Flankers (6 vs 12) This means the Flankers have a much significant combat endurance where it's capable to fight at least 2, 3, or more planes per sortie, plus if you use your missiles conservatively, you could shoot down even lot more enemies before having to rearm at base

[@svrsl7819]

Man, The Sims really hits different these days 😭

[@wartheunderbro]

“add 9X” Russia loses its main advantage agains blue team

[@102ndsmirnov7]

The R-73 isn't an advantage, it's a worse dogfighting missile than the R-27ER at this point. I swear in recent updates it became less reliable than it was before.

[@wartheunderbro]

@ what?! How bad do you have to be doing that you say that, that’s crazy that you think that, but in my opinion it’s way better, maybe your just not using it right

[@wartheunderbro]

@ I have no idea how you could think that R-73s are bad

[@ikonik5438]

more people need to get the Temu Fighter

[@Past10Performance]

I would give gajin 50 bucks for them to add a ground EC mode with big maps and a revamp for air sim. Im sure many other players feel the same. Obviously they only care about the money so let us spend it where it is needed not on some prem vehicle we dont need

[@ZigaZagu]

I wish it were possible to actually vote with our money, I would absolutely throw down a hundred dollars on this. . . . Makes me wonder if someone could GoFundMe a new fucking gamemode out of Gaijin.

[@Past10Performance]

@ZigaZagu i think if we could make gajin aware of the fact people would spend money for gameplay improvements it wouldn't take them long to bite, like I think alot of the players understand it is a buisness and they have organized it so they have to bring money in every quarter and so far they have been doing that by adding vehicles/content but I and many others I think would happily pay once a year for a major gameplay upgrade. Gofund me or something similar where we could put money in escrow to show commitment is a good idea

[@endeyfire]

i literally just want IFF.

[@GhostVanguard]

If it didn't take 8 years to grind to high tier in a tree, I wouldn't mind grinding out russia or chiner

[@theegunpro4561]

I HAVE THAT FLIGHT STICK, THE FUCKING STICK DRIFT IS TERRIBLE BUT I MANAGE

[@justinterested5819]

For you as a player, you would be stupid not to take the best (and in real life most expensive and complicated one to make/maintain/use) piece of equipment, since it doesn't really have any disadvantage. If it was realistic, the red team would have like 3 times the player compared to the blue one, while the blue team gets better players compared to the red team, since the blue team crews are usually better trained.

[@СергейНикольский-я2ц]

1:44 tbh after last Su-27 FM buff it’s much better than 15C/E and better than F-16C in terms of FM (in DF, for BVR though (high alt high speed ER and acceleration) it is still muuuuuch worse both FM and avionics wise than any of those jets so it’s still a rat jet that is forced to play exclusively on the Afghan map, hide behind mountains and use only IRST + RWR + eyes to make kills

[@aidenbailey2402]

Your meant to fly like that, you turn on your radar then anyone in its cone is going to know. Keep it turned off, listen to the RWR and just stay low, its like this. American submariners and pilots know this. If you go "active" your trying to shine a flashlight in a dark field. Anyone who can see it now k knows where you are, and shoot. But if you stay quiet. Let the enemy go active and make the mistake your avoiding. If they keep their sensors on its easier to track and kill. In other words. Fly like a ghost

[@theroach2204]

Gaijin seems to think they can.

[@meferswift]

i specifically plays only up to early jet around BR6.0 i just can't get my head around jet and missile battle just yet.

[@morganfinlayson619]

i’d play sim a lot more if gaijin didn’t keep reverting my controls to a stupid setup where the Y button on my stick is the one to fire my guns every time i switch presets, does anyone know how to fix this?

[@DaYuutato]

wait how do u release multiple bombs at different targets with the GBU4s? i've been trying to do it but it always go for the laser even when i turn off the laser.

[@sethharpenger607]

i really want them to add/continue fictional tech trees, like a trashy version of the usa, a fancy elitist version of the ussr more biplanes, jets and prop planes, either inspired by things that didn't happen or plausible 'if x had y' planes

[@DylanAlexander-nv1ez]

Sim is more balanced than it ever has been and I love it!

[@codaman127]

What I'm hearing is... The Nato F15 and F16 were just so much better than the opposing options that it lead to an imbalance in air superiority. Yes. Yes- that is accurate as far as history is concerned. Yes.

[@ThePadadada]

that fucking old flightstick is exactly the one i have xd

[@fullflow1453]

I dont touch top tier sim but the 11.0-12.7 area is really fun

[@ezoni8438]

Warthunder players realizing IRL warfare isnt balanced

[@jxnah.]

I used to pray for uploads like this❤‼️

[@MilenKitsune]

A way to see if the plane is enemy or friendly is to do the air alert if it doesnt say anything then its a friendly

[@ccclll987]

In my opinion, they should limit the amount of player that can access any lobby above a certain br range. This way, no mattee the game balance, teams can never be too imbalanced in terms of player count. Given also that maps are small for high tiers, putting a limit would also make the fight less random. I would probably limit top tier lobbies to 6v6 or 8v8 is I was gaijin. Red players rarely go above those numbers anyway.

[@theumbreon1.0]

They could just add IFF systems to jets

[@narachi-]

as a sim player for years, top tier is bricked

[@siphige4048]

hello, nice vide. I was wondering, what key's and how to you use you free look

[@jerichostevens2711]

I tried playing air sim one time... I couldn't even take off from airfield... it was being camped by the enemy...... just waiting for me to get into the air where they could launch a missile at me.

[@Random-Griefs]

i play the jeff a lot in sim and i just bring 4 pl5s at this point. hug the ground and shoot bs op irccm missiles

[@danielceban2544]

whats your setup for sim ?

[@joeygilpin6562]

I think gaijin should make more modes like a 8v8 (smaller teams) only dogfight guns mode and another mode should be like sim but you can go in 3rd person (no player names or missile diamonds like GRB)

[@oflofl7177]

as an Xbox player who enjoys sim, great vid

[@cadenfabbricino7039]

sim needs to add iff

[@Tedger]

Ability to camp the spawn never coming to ground map is insane.. if CAS player is half decent there are not threats to him than other planes. Managing to hit anything from ground beyond 6k at 12.0 is near impossible unless pantsir... which is far from balances or fair mechanic.

[@TheJackSilence]

Everytime I see that the Radar gun sight in the Eurofighter Is still Not fixed I become really sad

[@RealNotallGaming]

yes you can balance and is SIMPLE ! RAW K\D for every single vehicle so even if the player is BETTER, he will not outperform the match because ... his problems, but it will K\D as always and you will have a BALANCED lobby end of the lesson example i kill ALWAYS\OFTEN 3 tanks and AFK so im 3\0 - 3\1 raw K\D on almost every single tanks i use (1 tank lineup only, almost every match) i will fight ONLY 3\0 - 3\1 K\D enemy vehicles ^^

[@JasonSchmal-en5bs]

I saw that you are a xbox player or do you just have a xbox controller for your PC? If you're on xbox how are you using a flight stick?

[@RaduTudor1874]

Do you use flightstick or controler for sim?

[@jeremiahwelborn5526]

Simulation and balancing don't compute, when you start trying to balance, it's no longer sim

[@troopx]

How are your sim controls so smooth?

[@ettorelorenzoni8311]

How do you turn your head in cockpit view? That’s not VR or head track and looks clean, the main fact that stops me from sim is that war thunder VR is bad

[@multigrade3486]

Hey can you do a controller set up video? On how your binds work on remote? I know you play on and Xbox controller for the most part, I’m on PlayStation and I want to have some clarity on what some options mean?

[@AiRbU380]

and the j10 gets no custom hms or hmd and it is sooo baddd, until last update the j10 cant even show where your radar locked target its

[@ZigaZagu]

Yeah, it fucking blows. Feel better off in the J8F and just landing often.

[@KauppaKomissaari]

Theres the f15ex too and i guess tge f15active and f16xl too

[@notnurfcreanga]

i pray to god that the f15ex never gets added, america is already op as it is

[@KauppaKomissaari]

@notnurfcreanga its a 4.5gen like the typhoon op depends on what it gets for missiles

[@notnurfcreanga]

@ its not about that, its that us shouldn't get more stuff, they already have the most top tiers with 3 of them being f15, with the hornet coming soon i don't think the ex should come to the game

[@KauppaKomissaari]

@notnurfcreanga its comming before f22 so usa has a full 4.5 gen likely with later eurofightert variants with aesa

[@notnurfcreanga]

@ you don't get my point, war thunder ISNT fit for modern warfare, its very clear that top tier is in the worst state its ever been, it should have stopped at the a variants without fox-3, the maps are still tiny, spawns right next to each other, its basically just ace combat at this point. newer stuff technology wise shouldn't come to the game, flesh out every thing else first

[@nevergonagiveuup6200]

If no china player team kill will significantly decrease alot at all mode

[@188Maus]

played one game of sim pulled like 8 cobras on takeoff and then got told about SAS then i TKd my teamate and got killed by an f16

[@davidvasquez749]

I know this is off topic but have y’all tried Mig 17s against F-4Es

[@hansmuller7859]

0:18 lmfao i literally have that exact thing right next to me

[@rocket_ride]

I have that as well lmao. It's good though

[@chaindler9]

If you dont like EC matchups, you can always play Ground SIM, where its ALWAYS NATO vs. Soviets/China, and the "problem" mentioned in this video does not exists.

[@Past10Performance]

Have been doing that lately. The biggest problem is that the games are so short and you often have to wait 5+ mins for one to start. Pair that with the fact top tier is only available every 3rd day or so and it's pretty much not worth the time for alot of people. They should make it unlimited spawns for ground units till tickets bleed with 2 aircraft spaws per player or something and have topteir on a permanent rotation

[@usmcpound]

@@Past10Performanceyeah idk why gayjin doesn’t just make it so all ranks are available all the time like air EC

[@ZigaZagu]

They need to just make one of 9.7, 10.7, 11.7, top tier available all the time. It's ridiculous not to.

[@Past10Performance]

@@usmcpound probably not enough players. I think atleast too tier should be permanent tho like those of us that have made it that far have alot of time or money invested at least let us use it all the time

[@JL-nl9hp]

hello, i just saw that you were using a controler to play in sim, is it possible to publish all your keybinds pls ?

[@aricjones5040]

Packet loss hmm is unreal

[@themagicboy6548]

Try sim with 40's-50's planes for a real experience

[@BAM_BAM_XCI]

The F-15e is still the best in the game. Flat out, multipathing doesn't work when the missile is directly above you, traveling at borderline hypersonic speeds at terminal speed and you literally can't engage a plane at mach 2 flying in the opposite direction at the same time

[@DoctorBruKhar]

Our technology has made us weak

[@crashsmash6090]

Iv played mostly usa but iv never had a problem with the eurofighter or the Rafael

[@ZigaZagu]

EC Air Sim is the best gamemode in the game. Everything else is just a waste of time.

[@SuperTitoneli]

About the Flanker buff.... I don't want to sound like a boring nerd but I didn't like the changes that were made in itself, about the new engines there's nothing to talk about, that part is incredible but in the flight model of the SU27 itself I didn't like the idea of ​​it doing better rate fights than an F15C, the Flanker should be one of the most lethal fighters in 1-circle fights in the game, being on par with the Rafale and the Typhoon but being inferior to fighters like the F15 and F16 in two-circle fights but Gaijin simply reversed things, don't get me wrong at least we're moving but I think in the opposite direction.

[@a_catfish5180]

Guys help me decide I have completed (or at least almost, very soon) US, UK, and Sweden I really want to try redfor (ussr let’s be honest) BUT I really want the rafale too. Should I go for the rafale and hope by the time I have that, won’t buy the premium mirage that thing looks cringe. the next update will add a new Soviet jet?

[@FelixNeumann-p9f]

how can you play sim without that ugly control thing in the cokpit

[@ryanrekz7744]

Break out the su 35 and its a whooe different ball game

[@FlyBoyJo1994]

If you don’t have a set yet, I recommend you get a mouse and keyboard. It looked like your on a console and consoles can take mouse and keyboard for War Thunder. It is way nicer experience at least for ground and air rb. I haven’t tried air sim with controller in a while.