Honestly your best bet is to join the sim discords from all the sim KZbinrs, tons of resources and helpful people in there who can help with opinions, guides and setting up controls.

The majority of warthunder players are unaware that Grumman was involved in the aerodynamic design of the JF-17 prototype, and that the JF-17 was initially planned to use the F404 engine. The JF-17 is also the first military aircraft in aviation history to use a DSI (Diverterless Supersonic Inlet).

@@prmoh1027 They don't care. They see Chinese and hence it's either copied, stolen, "Temu", or not equivalent to [insert Western plane]. Or all of the above. I hate this Nato Thunder Mentality.

Yeah it's really getting old

@@Spicysauced As a aviation enthusiast, I really dislike some War Thunder players bring too much political bias into the game rather than appreciating aircraft purely from the perspective of aerospace engineering. Additionally, many people overlook the fact that different countries have different defense needs when simply comparing aircraft performance, so the design objectives were different from the start.

He moved his camera up, his HUD follows

@@specc_s1452thank you, i have since figured out how to do this

did you account for ground, installation, channel loss and speed variables for the configurations on your bug report? if you didn’t that means it will be thrown out because they probably already did their own math

​@@jaek__this is the one most stupid lie about migs engines. Bruh, people should really learn that gaijin will ruin any soviet vehicle if needed, when there are different numbers in different sikrit dokumints. Remember situation with type 90, after which they removed fixed "historical" numbers and calculated all those penetrations with the formula. They wanted soviet tech tree to be ruined so they did it and found a very very stronk argument which is wrong Funny that you have mig 29 with 20 degrees/second sistained turn lol, this is s t u p i d

@@ДонныйАдмирал the mig 29s engines in WTRTI are around 100kn each at max thrust and optimal ranges, i believe the jf is in a similar ballpark, this is pretty strong for such light planes lol, you guys complain sm about your tree getting nerfed when you have no idea what you’re talking about. you’re the exact same as f15a players saying it’s missing like 40 kN of thrust when the plane was pushing like 130 kN each at mach. the thrust in the hangar is not indicative of actual thrust

@@ДонныйАдмирал and thrust figures from wikipedia are also either wrong or out of context

@@jaek__ check out my bug report "JF17 pilot view too low/incorrect stats). This is accurate real values from multiple sources. Its also been 5 days with it open, my first report wasn't done properly so it was closed. My second is plenty valid

Makes no difference since 13.3 is never at the top of a bracket and it will only ever fight against 13.7’s. It’s the same as 13.7 in every way.

You germany players cry so much about the ICE What BR do you want it at ? 12.7 ? It was always going to be a rather bad plane that was going to ne impossible to balance but you coped into thinking it would be great

@@bigmemer4398 I mean, I have a 3-1 k/d with it and enjoy it even if it sucks.

Just because it’s not flashing in red across your screen doesn’t mean you aren’t pulling Gs

@@mikeyplayzwrld What?

@@Jakub_Marcinkowski The slightest shift in direction is pulling Gs. If you tap the elevator up once you just pulled Gs

@@mikeyplayzwrld Its called acceleration, so any change of speed is "pulling Gs". Change of direction is not the same thing as acceleration but it is heavy influenced by it.

@@mikeyplayzwrld All i wanted to say is that you cant pull more g and lose less speed because those two things are the same. Its like saying that i am walking faster and slower at the same time. G means earth acceleration whitch is close to 9.3m/s^ so if you are expiriencing 4G it means that your speed is changing by 37,2m/s each second. Sorry for my english, not my native language. I hope that you understad nów what i meant.

this is so many planes in war thunder. I've made a detailed bug report on jf17, so hopefully everything gets fixed

it is very fun, i'll probably roll out into some sim after this video

Real

Haaiiiiii CPU

@@Yokochan84 hello there

its more like a temu f16

We have battleratings for a reason.

lol, of course red team asks for planes from 2010s to fight blue planes from the 90s. if gaijin want to "save" the blue team (if that's even necessary), there is always the mach 2 bumble bee from 2005.

@@artruisjoew5473 I don't think the Reds are asking for these planes, but I'm sure they'll be added. According to the method of taking money from players, imbalanced planes are simply needed, first on one side, then on the other. Only in this case they will donate a lot to get an advantage

To be honest you could add this right now and it wouldn't really make a difference AESA or PESA doesn't matter if the missile uses its own onboard radar regardless, which is the way fox 3 works rn

@@artruisjoew5473date of introduction doesn't matter, its about competitiveness, i don't know why people still in 2024 can't cope with this and bring this up when nobody enjoyed M4 shermans vs historical MM or p51s vs 262s

Yeah I hope we get MIG 29M soon J-11A was a very dumb choice on Gaijin's part, J-11B would have been competitive against F-15C

if it was american it would've been implemented with all the features.. Gaijin continues balancing the game around their whales i guess

@@bigmemer4398 i have recently found on the data sheet that shows every (ingame) missiles irccm there is a chinese spaa with the suspended and gatewidth irccms. they very well couldve give it its full potential but decided not to

blue can always have the mach 2 bumble bee. then the game will really be unplayable.

@@artruisjoew5473 they will simply add the PL-17 and AIM-260(when it comes out)

They're played by a too small minority of players

gaijin have said themselves that you can use it

@@ikonik5438 i tried it once and didnt get any GE and then i got a warning saying it wasnt a registered partner of gaijin

They will add that with block 60, J-10C variant, J-16…

F18C doesn't really bring anything new or special given its lackluster kinematic performance. sure it has more AMRAAMS but unless you are trying to fire on their entire team, you don't need that many. eagles and vipers will still be far superior to the hornet.

It's annoying when damn near everyone on red quits like 30 mins into the match

@@RT42069 100% that is the issue

@@RT42069 if there are 10 blues and 4 reds obviously they are going to quit , dont join a match if the teams are severely outnumbered. and trust me i got both f15c/16c , mig29smt/su27sm and blue side is much much easier.

lmao, Russian planes are inferior to US planes in nearly every way, avionics, missiles, flight performance.

The j10 is not unbalanced and red vs blue team was not balanced before the update. The reason red quits early is because the terrible flight models and the invisible aim9m. On one hand you have the Americans with an f16 that can 1 circle anything In the game, and on the other you have the mig 29 which falls out of the sky after 1 turn. This doesn't combo well with the fact that red nations have shorter range arh missles (r77) which means they have to close the gap. If you get to the merge with anything besides an f4 phantom in the mig 29, you are dead. Also the aim9m is way to invisible. I understand it has a "smokeless" motor but that should not make it inbisible.