Mufti Abu Layth tells the tragic story of the Baramika
Пікірлер: 67
@mustikhan75122 жыл бұрын
Haroon al Rasheed is always mentioned by Alims with such reverence , cannot believe that he could do such an evil act. Thank you saab as always you are awesome.🙌🏽🌈
@muslimabubakar93842 жыл бұрын
Over 90% of our so called rulers were so bad and brutal. I am never surprised hearing such kind of barbarism against innocent muslims inflicted by many our merciless rulers
@saeedcheema21952 жыл бұрын
The beauty of Mufti Sb, اللہ کرے زورِ بیاں اور زیادہ
@danielmahmood58552 жыл бұрын
Mufti with the thumbnails 😎🤙 Approaching 30k as well now 👀 You've encouraged many to use think and use reason (as God has instructed us to do) and explore reality for themselves- using the gift that God gave us. Doiiiggg itt
@lovmovement84772 жыл бұрын
Amazing storytelling. And appreciate your commitment to historical honesty & always putting things in a human context. Great talk
@fasalalbana49132 жыл бұрын
Love your new look sheikh, beautiful, suits your intellectuality. Allah increase you in your knowledge, keep it up brother. Love listening to you as a Maliki myself.
@MuftiAbuLayth2 жыл бұрын
much love ❤🙌🏻
@abuzaine39562 жыл бұрын
JazakAllah khayr. That was a wonderful approach to this historical event. I love the talks of Islamic history related to some important life/Islamic morals to take with the listener.
@iman7j8872 жыл бұрын
Mufti you are so cool and so funny also you are so informative i never get tired from you explaining history or islamic matters.
@thecrimsondragon97445 ай бұрын
Great, great video. I have for a long time now been looking to learn more about these influential families which converted to Islam in it's early days from other religions (Buddhism, Zoroastrianism, Christianity etc) and the big ripples they made. The Barmakids and the Bukhtishu especially have caught my attention for a while now. Many of these families seem to be non-Arabs and it goes without saying the Persians once more made their mark on Islamic history. It could be argued without their influence and patronage, there would have been no 'Islamic Golden Age'. Thank you very very much, Mufti Abu Laith, for shining a light on these lesser known parts of Islamic history 🙏🏽
@agostocobain27295 ай бұрын
what Persian scholars effected the golden age, this part of Islam is my weak point, history part.
@zzzzz6532 ай бұрын
Barmakids were not Persians but East Iranic (Bactrian language) speakers who were Buddhists and possibly even connected with Kashmir. They were responsible for bringing a lot of Indian scientific knowledge to the Abbasid court.
@mylordincreasemeinknowledg73892 жыл бұрын
Mufti is an extraordinary narrator. This is your best role bro . Mightily interesting !!
@mylordincreasemeinknowledg73892 жыл бұрын
Stay within this realm. You are now regarded as a true educator/historian. Maa shaa Allah tabaarakallah
@ayeshazareen30922 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@MuftiAbuLayth2 жыл бұрын
May Allah keep you blessed 🙌🏻💯
@khanG-gq9hc2 жыл бұрын
This was incredible 🔥🔥❤️
@ayeshazareen30922 жыл бұрын
Mesmerizing rendition 👏🏽
@TheHeartInTheSpade2 жыл бұрын
This stuff would make such good movies omg, I could imagine the film in my Mind when we was talking about the dream and how we went to the peanut seller.
@Full26352 жыл бұрын
They made a series about it
@slkslk78412 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@MuftiAbuLayth2 жыл бұрын
much love yaar 🙌🏻❤
@Deep2Islam2 жыл бұрын
Mufti's switching between British and urdu is on another level😂
@almurabitun2 жыл бұрын
You mean Switching between English and Pakistani :p
@Deep2Islam2 жыл бұрын
@@almurabitunwhat is the difference bro?
@hhhuthhhjj55992 жыл бұрын
@@almurabitun lol the language is urdu there are many pakistani languages like punjabi, urdu etc
@almurabitun2 жыл бұрын
@@hhhuthhhjj5599 I know lol similarly the language for the brother is English hehehe
@hhhuthhhjj55992 жыл бұрын
@@almurabitun lmao.. I have low sense of humor to comprehend your joke Your joke was more complicated than hadith sciences
@akib25422 жыл бұрын
First time I've ever heard of them.. amazing story...
@jirren1402 жыл бұрын
mufti u r awesome ❤️
@Johnelhadjmi2 жыл бұрын
30 k now youtube !
@rahmasalim54572 жыл бұрын
Asaalamu Calaykum brother please I would appreciate if you can cover for umaya dynasty how thay become so powerful and may Allah reward you❤
@homeboysudaka56292 жыл бұрын
Saludos mufti . Love your narration hermano
@centric1452 жыл бұрын
I m dying to read history book about Muslim world .Mufti if u can recommend some I will be forever grateful
@user-hh2is9kg9j2 жыл бұрын
You have good storytelling skills, I was engaged the whole video. Do you think mutawatir hadiths can be the solution to replace other hadith collections as a primary source for Islam besides Quran? Are there any problematic hadiths in the mutawatir hadiths collection?
@rumannahami37452 жыл бұрын
I thing there is no muttawatir hadith collection
@BrRizzy12 жыл бұрын
There would not be any problem with the veracity of mutawatir Hadith, as by definition they are Hadith with so many independent chains that their authenticity is beyond doubt. However, the problem then is that there are very few mutawatir Hadith, not enough for complete guidance. With all Hadith, including mutawatir, the challenge is always to assess their relevance to an issue. Hence imam Malik mentioning authentic Hadith in the Muwatta but then explaining that the Hadith is not followed in Medina.
@agostocobain27295 ай бұрын
Khorasan today is Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan ( before Seljuks inhabited it) those first countries I listed have deep connections.
@HistoryST Жыл бұрын
Sir you're awesome
@zakyzayn53612 жыл бұрын
But mufti baramikas were not Zoroastrians they were Buddhist
@MuftiAbuLayth2 жыл бұрын
many resources quote them as of Zoroastrian descent but that's not important with their story since the faith wouldve been their great grandfather's time and not theirs. What is significant is that they were of powerful descent.
@zakyzayn53612 жыл бұрын
@@MuftiAbuLayth yup absolute and they also contributed by bringing lots of Manuscripts of Indic Philosophical Thought to house of wisdom .
@786AbdulSalamKhan2 жыл бұрын
They were Manichaeans, many Manichaeans from Central Asia claimed to be Buddhist. Muslim writers generally could not distinguish between Zoroastrians & Manichaeans which is why the Baramikas were considered to be Zoroastrian.
@zakyzayn53612 жыл бұрын
@@786AbdulSalamKhan maybe but they did contributed a lot in house wisdom and introduced knowledge of eastern traditions to middle eastern Muslim world
@zzzzz6532 ай бұрын
@@786AbdulSalamKhanthey were Buddhist. They never themselves claimed to be Buddhist as per any records. It is modern scholarship, which has carefully looked at the records and the history of the region of Balkh where they came from, which now hold that they were previously Buddhist. Their title Barmak itself is a corruption of the Sanskrit term Pramukha or Pramukh which means the head or chief. They were hereditary priests of the Buddhist temple at Balkh known as Nava Vihara (New Monastery). The description of this Nava Vihara in early Islamic records leaves little room to doubt that this was a Buddhist temple and had nothing to do with Zoroastrianism. Balkh was also the homeland of the Kushans who ruled over a great empire stretching from Central India to Central Asia all the way upto Tarim Basin.
@BigRaj58092 жыл бұрын
never outshine the master
@afifkhaja2 жыл бұрын
One person should never have absolute power
@africanhistory Жыл бұрын
a minor note if the word Khalif comes from Khalifate why do you pronounce one Western Anglo and the other properly?
@haroon4202 жыл бұрын
Wow! My name is Haroon Rashid and I don’t approve of this! 😆 having said that, most probably he realised that they were trying to gain too much power and were beginning to become a rival power base. We see this till today. This is always a problem with dynastic powers and hence why we should avoid dynasties at all costs because it never gives other people a chance to rule and then the only way they can take power is by force. Ultimately, only the one who is more vicious or ruthless will rise to the top. It ends being a gentleman’s game. Such a shame since the family sounded to be proper administrative technocrats and knew how to run a government effectively.
@noamansattar2 жыл бұрын
Heartbroken 💔 today
@sulahu Жыл бұрын
48 Laws of power. Never outshine the master. It was the mistake that happened.
@786AbdulSalamKhan2 жыл бұрын
From what I read, the Barmakids were Manichaeans hence why i) they claimed to be of Buddhist heritage in Central Asia & ii) Muslims mistakenly believed them to be Zoroastrian, not knowing the difference. Manichaeism was an ancient syncretic religion, but thought to be subversive however by political powers, as Manichaeans would claim to be Christian, Buddhist, Muslim, etc. depending on the surrounding environment & culture. The organisational structure of the Ismaili Shi’ite religion for example, is remarkably similar to the organisational structure of the Manichaean Church, and the emergence of the Ismailis in the Middle East would coincide with the Manichaeans departure from the Middle East. Hence why polemicists would attribute Manichaean origins to the Ismaili religion.
@agostocobain2729 Жыл бұрын
They were Persians from present Afghanistan and yes Buddhist
@zzzzz6532 ай бұрын
@@agostocobain2729they were Buddhist but they were not Persian. They were native people of Balkh, the same region from where the Kushans originated. The Sasanid Persians did not have much influence on them. Unfortunately the post-Islamic Persian influence on this region makes people mistakenly believe that the ore-Islamic people of this region were also Persian. They were East Iranic speakers like the Pashtuns. But will you call the Pashtuns Persians ?
@agostocobain27292 ай бұрын
@@zzzzz653 Balkh still has Persians called Tajiks today. They definitely were not Pashtuns. The culture of this family are kind, and caring, and that is Persians culture. I’m not saying Pashtuns aren’t, but they can be very crude and barbaric. History has it that they are Persians. Since Persians are also in Iran, and Iran is a Shia country today, people want to say certain figure in Islam aren’t Persians, but they 100% were. Like Al Bukhari, Imam Muslim, Abu Hanifa, Al Ghazali, etc. For instance when you google Abu Hanifas ethnicity now it’s says he’s of Indian origin, and if you google Imam Muslim it says could be Persian or Arab, and same with Tabari. Which means someone changed their wiki page.
@agostocobain27292 ай бұрын
@@zzzzz653 No I don’t call Pashtuns Persians, but they are Iranian sure. Pashtuns aren’t the nicest of people let me tell you, just go to Afghanistan and see. They are brute people.
@agostocobain27292 ай бұрын
@@zzzzz653 So what? Rumi was a Pashtun? You know what show me proof. Show me proof of all these people being Pashtun, I’ll wait… Site sources. You must be Pashtun yourself. Is Al Bukhari Pashtun? Come on man. Just because you want something to be true doesn’t mean it is.
@caleg100hari2 жыл бұрын
Ha Ha. Ladies and gentlements, this is one of the true colours in one of our great khalifah, Harun ibn al rasyid. I think you sum it perfectly, "power tend to corrupt" it happened to all dynasty, furthermore in their so called "golden age" time. Its more vulnerable to lot of leader. The bigger power and authority they have, the bigger the treats of "was was" came. We could analyzing a lot how easy man lost his power and how man, a great man so called by lots of people, could slip into paranoia and become the darth vader kind of things LOL. I am sure and i kind of wish, like all the sinners, Harun in his rest of his life realize his horrible mistake and seek for forgiveness. And He is the merciful.
@read764111 ай бұрын
Love the info. But the desiness of certain points is very unbecoming my brother. Stick to the point of the story and avoid the antics. Thank you for the message
@icysaracen30542 жыл бұрын
I think the Barmakids were descendants of Buddhists monks not Zoroastrians Magi
@MuftiAbuLayth2 жыл бұрын
many resources quote them as of Zoroastrian descent but that's not important with their story since the faith wouldve been their great grandfather's time and not theirs. What is significant is that they were of powerful descent.
@centric1452 жыл бұрын
Is not the punishment for traitors ,crucifiction?If he did that to Jafar,that means that is what he believe about him ,that he was a traitor.
@yatuaneeka22932 жыл бұрын
😁😁😁... Confused where from the sir is??
@juslostone10 ай бұрын
No sir. You are telling the romanticized version. The Barmakids we're Buddhist. And ancient Buddhist themes permeate Islam today. The kabba and yhe burqa are both themes from Buddhism. Flying wind horses and cubes. The Ummayah were the closest thing to true Islam. This is why they had no problem destroying the Kabba in the past. The Ummayah produce the original quran's, the Abassid pampered with the original and the Abassid invented most of the hadith today. You cannot justify writing Hadith 200 years after the prophet as a first-hand account.