Addressing 17 Hebrew Roots Questions

Рет қаралды 8,213

Defending the Biblical Roots of Christianity

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 505

@SusansRoadLessTraveled 3 ай бұрын

I watched this documentary early on when I joined HRM. 6-1/2 years later I left last December. I even argued against you when watching Wilber's videos with you. I had all the talking points down. So much to say about the movement, so little time. I emailed you Dr. Solberg to thank you for your videos.

@TheBiblicalRoots 3 ай бұрын

How dare you argue against me! (Kidding, of course.) Thanks for sharing that, God bless you, Susan! RLS

@rayray4192 3 ай бұрын

Wilber is a proud man spitting in the face of Jesus.

@6969smurfy 3 ай бұрын

@rayray4192 you are pulling HIS beard out! 😢

@rayray4192 3 ай бұрын

@@6969smurfy if you are trying to communicate you are a failure

@salpezzino7803 3 ай бұрын

@@rayray4192 you are too nice

@henryjordan9453 2 ай бұрын

I’m a messianic Jew who try’s to obey the Torah I view it not as a requirement but I view as a privilege

@ThePowerminer11 3 ай бұрын

Thanks for doing this! You played a significant role in leading me out of HRM. The two most wonderful moments of my life was 1. Coming to faith, and 2. Leaving Torahism

@salpezzino7803 3 ай бұрын

did you come to faith while in the Satanic Cult the Hebrew/Jewish Roots?

@6969smurfy 3 ай бұрын

@ThePowerminer11 I find it fascinating that comments like these, turning From Thy Wisdim of Torah are most always by the Nameless commentators... Why is that?

@salpezzino7803 3 ай бұрын

@@6969smurfy Luckily we all know you are in the Satanic Cult the Hebrew/Jewish roots

@ThePowerminer11 3 ай бұрын

@@6969smurfy Because I made this account name when I was 13, I was making minecraft videos and I thought this was a cool channel name. My name is Linus Carlberg, I have no reason to hide.

@Lotterywinnerify Ай бұрын

Said 6969 smurfy…why is that?

@BipolarDistortion 3 ай бұрын

Excellent work in responding to these concerns. Thank you for all of the time & thought you've put into these.

@SmellyTennisBawls 2 ай бұрын

Some of these questions are so condescending it hurts. HRM is so full of elitism it’s amazing they can’t see it. I have friends that are deep in, but thankfully can call them brothers/sisters in Christ. For people that are so legalistic it’s also amazing how much they lack in grace/and joy in freedom.

@thespaminator 3 ай бұрын

I honestly don’t know how you do it. I don’t know how you stay so calm and gracious. I have a couple of family members that have fallen into this so I’ve dedicated a fair amount of time looking into this. Trying to talk sense into these people is like trying to talk to a flat earther. It’s unbelievably frustrating.

@TheBiblicalRoots 3 ай бұрын

I hear you! It is very frustrating. If you haven't seen it yet, you might find this video of ours helpful: *Five tips for responding to Torah-keeping family and friends* kzbin.info/www/bejne/fIOulGlrrpmBgrc Blessings, RLS

@hollymills4096 2 ай бұрын

Hey as a Flat Earther that’s a low blow but that’s ok, Globers are Christians too 😊

@missdebbie6791 Ай бұрын

The truth does frustrate the lie.

@Homeschool4Christ 10 күн бұрын

You aint lying 💔

@interrupts165 3 ай бұрын

See how easy the truth destroys all those lies. Good job with the video.

@coreybassard 3 ай бұрын

😂😂 whoa, you got me cracking up with the “99 problems” line. Haha Thanks for this video.

@messiahcomplex1126 3 ай бұрын

Psalms 119:53 Horror hath taken hold upon me because of the wicked that forsake thy law.

@coreybassard 3 ай бұрын

@@messiahcomplex1126 Praise God that He’s written it on our hearts!

@messiahcomplex1126 3 ай бұрын

@@coreybassard amen ❤️ I don’t know too many people that have it in their hearts though. I’m sure David was talking about the people that do not walk in His ways, my life has been destroyed by people that do not.

@educational4434 2 ай бұрын

@@messiahcomplex1126In other words, you feel it in your conscience when you transgress the law and are eventually moved to repentance each time, or over time

@messiahcomplex1126 2 ай бұрын

@@educational4434 except I know I can’t trust my conscience per Jer 17:9 and like Paul said I wouldn’t know what sin was except for the Torah.

@teakoettel 3 ай бұрын

Well done Brother Solberg, yet again

@josephlarrew 3 ай бұрын

That's what so many of the HRM people do. If you provide some sort of defense or point that contradicts theirs, they seem to think you're defending everything the church does. So frustrating.

@6969smurfy 3 ай бұрын

@josephlarrew back at Ha joseph! You christanity-ism do the exact Same thing to US peoples that See the wisdom in Torah!

@chrisart4you 2 ай бұрын

God only made a covenant with the nation of Isreal. He never made a any covenant with any Gentiles. The New Testament was fulfilled by His obedience by the death on the cross. We enter into this covenant by faith in His blood. So Jesus filled the requirement with the Father by His sacrifice obtaining the forgiveness of sin. It is our faith in His blood that we are now declared righteous. It is not our responsibility to live the Christian life it is our response to His ability. It is not a law relationship but life relationship. Paul said I pray that you would know my mystery in Christ. Crist in you the hope of glory.

@dancingzolins6782 2 ай бұрын

The Bible includes 8 Covenants: Edenic, Adamic, Noahic, Abrahamic, Mosaic, Land, Davidic, and New. The first three were made with all nations to come, i.e. Gentiles, as they were made before Israel existed. It could even be argued that the Abrahamic Covenant was made with a Gentile, as the nation of Israel (Jacob's descendants) came two generations later. Thus, it is inaccurate to say God never made any covenant with Gentiles.

@kimartist 2 ай бұрын

All the above (re: dancingzollins) plus: Testament MEANS Covenant. Old Testament = Old Covenant. New Testament = New Covenant. Marriage is also a covenant. God considered Himself in a marriage covenant with faithless Israel who cheated on Him, i.e. they broke the marriage covenant, forcing Him to divorce.

@educational4434 2 ай бұрын

The answer to 10:53 where the young man asks: "Why did Peter still not eat anything unclean even though Jesus said all foods are clean?" is that Jesus did not declare all foods clean. Eating meat sacrificed to idols is still unclean. Eating rats and swine flesh is still physically, health-wise, unclean. He was talking about spiritual uncleanness. And the scope of what he was discussing was limited to a certain context. Why do I say it was limited? Because he declares later in Revelation that eating meat sacrificed to idols is sin. So does eating swine flesh and rats make you spiritually unclean according to Jesus? No. Does it make you unhealthy and your body physically unclean? Yes. Were those laws given for more reasons than just separating the Israelites from the nations that surrounded them? Were those health laws given out of concern for the health of the people he was guiding? Yes. Do those health laws support our health in this modern age even as Gentile Christians? Yes. So there is a difference between spiritual uncleanness with regard to food and physical uncleanness with regard to food. The bottom line is: if you want optimal health, follow the dietary laws. And if you wish to not sin with regard to food, do not be gluttonous and do not eat meat sacrificed to idols or consume blood or meat with blood in it (the red juice that comes out of red meat is not blood, by the way.

@Mikhael1964 2 ай бұрын

At last, someone talking sense. Most importantly Biblical Hermeneutical,contextual,and exegetical sense..Amen 🙏

@educational4434 2 ай бұрын

@@Mikhael1964 Thank you, brother. Peace be with you 🕊️

@chdreaddude 3 ай бұрын

We got! 99 problems but that Torah ain’t one! ☝️ 😂❤

@messiahcomplex1126 3 ай бұрын

Psalms 119:53 Horror hath taken hold upon me because of the wicked that forsake thy Torah.

@chdreaddude 3 ай бұрын

@@messiahcomplex1126 hey friend! What exactly do you mean? I just don’t totally understand what that verse is referring to

@messiahcomplex1126 3 ай бұрын

@@chdreaddude hi, what I mean is, to put it simply, all the evil that happens in this world is due to people not following The Creators instructions. I’ve had some very bad things done to my family so this verse really hits home with me. Blessings to you ❤️

@chdreaddude 2 ай бұрын

@@messiahcomplex1126 blessings to you too! Thanks for that explanation and I’m sorry for your hurt! Praise God for freedom in Christ! Blessings brother

@messiahcomplex1126 2 ай бұрын

@@chdreaddude amen and thank you, it all worked together for good , He used it all as a catalyst to wake me up from my stupor. He’s been so faithful to restore my life since I started walking the narrow path with Messiah and striving to enter in at the straight gate ❤️

@michaelbrutsche75 2 ай бұрын

Is it required of a believer to honor their Mother and Father ?

@_thisismeisthatyou9277 2 ай бұрын

During the liturgy in the Anglican church the priest breaks rhe break and states "Hallelujah, Christ our Passover has been sacrificed for us" and we respond "therefore let us keep the feast, Hallelujah" Christians do keep passover every week and especially Holy Week. I used to be HRM but i have discovered that the historical church follows and reads more of the Bible than HRM.

@timmccreery6597 Ай бұрын

I find it interesting that every one of these questions are delivered as if they are "zingers," and yet everyone is easily answered if you truly study the Word of God.

@friscoj68 2 ай бұрын

Thank God for your knowledge and passion in this area Brother Solberg. I have been in the trenches in opposing the erroneous doctrines that form the core of the HRM for over five years. You are a source of inspiration and a wealth of information. To use a biblical saying, you truly have shown the patience of Job. I have to say I have been personally affected by the HRM. My will is starting to fade and my energy low. I find the entrenched position of a lot of the followers of this Torah-keeping sect and their anger against those who don't share their beliefs kind of scary. I've been constantly verbally abused and had direct violence threatened toward me. They have their 12-15 talking points and really won't engage in any real debate. A couple of bible verses are starting to come to mind: Titus 3:9 (NIV) But avoid foolish controversies and genealogies and arguments and quarrels about the law, because these are unprofitable and useless. Matthew 7:6 (NIV) Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces.

@caonexpeguero9984 3 ай бұрын

Man, you're good. Very talented. Congrats!

@ShroudedinLove 3 ай бұрын

👏🏻 you are very thorough as always. I wanted to add that i believe that Jesus did fulfill all law, but the fall feasts are not yet fulfilled ✝️🙏🏼💟

@Onewaytruth86 3 ай бұрын

THANK YOU FOR MAKING THIS!

@Beyondthefirmament Ай бұрын

Hey why do you have a skull and a globe in the setting of your background?

@Beyondthefirmament Ай бұрын

Also, was Jesus a Jew or a Yahudim?

@Beyondthefirmament Ай бұрын

By the way I really appreciate and enjoy your content I just wonder sometimes. Do you believe the modern state of Israel is a fulfillment of prophecy?

@JojoOzfan 2 ай бұрын

The fact that they have two little girls asking these questions in this documentary doesn't sit well with me. Cults often target the most vulnerable. Good job on rebuking the Hebrew Roots Movement, brother Solberg.

@TheBiblicalRoots 2 ай бұрын

That jumped out at me, too! In fact, I almost didn't include the questions from the children for that reason. But, since their parents had already used them publicly in this trailer and the accompanying documentary, I kept them in. RLS

@JojoOzfan 2 ай бұрын

@@TheBiblicalRoots True. Their parents are probably part of this movement and so those poor children have been indoctrinated into believing this is the truth when it's not. I hope and pray though that those children and their families do get to know the true gospel of the true Christ, though

@sallyrickerson9139 Ай бұрын

@JojoOzfan I felt the same. Having Children asking the questions

@user-be4qz5uy6b 12 күн бұрын

Good effort answering these "questions." And I use quotations because oftentimes HR folks put forth loaded or rhetorical questions much like "have you stopped beating your wife?" to get you to admit that you're somehow "anti-law." They know for a fact that no genuine and sincere Christian is opposed to following the Lord's commandments. In fact that's what affirms whether you are a genuine follower of Christ and are being sanctified by the Spirit. The problem is they conflate moral laws and civil laws and ceremonial laws. Moral laws are eternal; ceremonial/civil laws aren't.

@anthonykloppers3377 18 күн бұрын

Gal 3 can really solve a lot of these back and forth arguments. It is very important when Paul mentions the word Law to ask yourself and understand from the context what laws, or what part of the Law he is referring to. In Gal 3 he explains that a covenant, once ratified, no one adds to it. Why then the Law - it was added because of transgressions he says. This is the nugget, the sentence that makes a distinction in the Law, in other words there was law that was being transgressed, and then there was Law that was added because of the transgressions. If we examine Exo 24 carefully, the book of the covenant is read , the people (mixed multitude) all agree to all God's instructions and then there is blood ratification and the covenant confirming meal - the covenant is now ratified! Straight after this God calls Moses back up the mountain, and now Moses gets the Law and commandments to "teach them" (schoolmaster). This is where the Law of the Tabernacle, Earthly high priest and associated reconcilliatory ministry is given , which includes all the sacrifices, offerings etc. God himself makes this same distinction when He says "obedience is better than sacrifice". Again He says "sacrifice and offering I DID NOT require, but a contrite heart". This is the Law that was a schoolmaster to bring us to Christ, and now that Christ has arrived and completed His first visitation and ministry, we are no longer under the schoolmaster. If we long to stay under that system, and rely on that system for forgiveness of sin, then we are rejecting the grace that was offered through Christ. A mistake is being made on both sides of the argument by seeing the word Law and assuming it always refers to everything in the first 5 books. So just like in secular law, there is the obligatory part of the law, and then there is the penal code. The penal code has no effect or power over us if we keep the obligatory part of the Law. If we examine the covenant - the instructions for feasts and Sabbaths were part of the covenant, given before the blood ratification in Exo 24. Noah even knew the distinction between clean and unclean animals. As for using Col 2:16,17 as proof against feast keeping, it is based on an assumption that the people in Colossae were not observing those things, and that assumption comes because of repeated sayings and teachings that circulate through the mainstream church, like oh those Jewish feasts, we Christians don't keep those Jewish feasts, we have our own holy days etc. Once this is a foundational thought and belief, it is easy to read into Paul's writings what we already believe. I will put it out there that the new believers in Colossae were observing Sabbath, feasts etc, and they were being judged by religious Jews who had added hundreds of additional do's and don'ts to these events. Compare this with the time when Jesus and His disciples were also judged according to traditions of men for breaking Sabbath because they crushed grain in their hands, and not washing hands properly according to the 👉traditions of men👈before eating bread. Verse 16 of Col 2, contains the word therefore, indicating we have to gain gain context from the surrounding text. Straight away we see Paul is speaking against "traditions of men" before and after verse 16.

@milkeggsnproducemilkeggsnp9076 3 ай бұрын

Jesus is the Lord of the sabbath. Jesus is our sabbath rest. This appears to be biblical to me.

@bringstolight 3 ай бұрын

Do you still eat bread and drink water? Because Jesus the bread of life and the living water.

@Mikhael1964 3 ай бұрын

So basically you are right about Sabbath, and the WHOLE of Christendom, Christianity, AND Jesus,Apostles, Church fathers, Christians AND the most world renowned Theologians, Bible Scholars etc for 2000 years have got it ALL wrong and therefore it's been WRONG of them to keep the Sabbath for 2000 years.,teach the Sabbath, proclaim the Sabbath for Christians Christendom ,Christianity....etc... wow are you a prophet? I doubt it.. more like a friend of satan ..

@6969smurfy 3 ай бұрын

@milkeggsnproducemilkeggsnp9076 AND AS SABBITH LORD I DECREE TO TAKE THE 7TH DAY SABBITH AWAY, as it is Not Written no where in Thy Scriptures!

@michaelbrutsche75 2 ай бұрын

Is it required of a believer to not steal from their neighbor?

@kneelanddonnelly4077 26 күн бұрын

I see you're doing what my dad likes to do. "For all the law is fulfilled even in this saying: ye shall love your neighbor as yourself."

@dallyjacobson2146 15 күн бұрын

Hi Rob, l have gone over the videos of your critics, and l have to say, you are SO correct over everything you have raised. It is too simplistic for those who feel comforted by keeping laws or doing sacrifices. And your latest take on Torah Observant folks, who have returned unto the beggarly elements. The Christian Church is off the rails for they have not the law written on their hearts. The Law of Liberty has exposed the tares, but shown that those who are led by the Spirit are fully born again. God is way to smart, for he is indeed not outsmarted by those who should again tangle us in Pharisaical laws. The law is perfect, converting the soul. Those who would lean in against the bosom of Jesus knowing he has fulfilled all debt upon the cross, and his blood has atoned for sin once and for all. Love you Rob

@sundayciscero 3 ай бұрын

This was great simple perfect responses to Hebrew roots questions that give clarity to what can be confusing and contradictory for many including myself not too long ago

@6969smurfy 3 ай бұрын

@sundayciscero it's called babble talk, from Babylon. All Man languages is influancers of His Own Biascies. For 2000 years man has been in control over bible language. Be careful. Sin One of Man tells the whole story, Thy Deciever Job is to get Man to NOT Follow Most Highs Instructions!

@gregmahler9506 3 ай бұрын

This is one of your best videos on this topic. God bless you!

@messengerisrael3817 3 ай бұрын

WHAT GOD , THE GOD OF THE TORAH ?

@gregmahler9506 3 ай бұрын

The God of Jesus.

@messengerisrael3817 3 ай бұрын

@@gregmahler9506 WHAT YOU MIGHT NOT UNDERSTAND , THE ONE YOU CALL JESUS CHRIST IS THE ONE WHO GAVE MAN THE TORAH . JOHN 1:1-3,14, 1.In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2The same was in the beginning with God. 3All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. 14.And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. THE WORD IS THE ONE WHO CREATED ALL THINGS ( INCLUDING MAN ) , AND HE IS THE ONE WHO CAME IN THE FLESH WITH THE NAME JESUS ; WHICH WAS NOT HIS NAME AT THE TIME HE GAVE THE TORAH TO THE NATION OF ISRAEL . JOHN 5:43 , I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive. THE ONE YOU CALL JESUS CAME IN THE FATHER'S NAME , BUT WHAT WAS HIS NAMES AND TITLES AT THE TIME OF ABRAHAM , ISAAC , JACOB , AND THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL ( JEHOVAH , YAHWEH , ISRAEL , I AM , THE GOD OF ABRAHAM , ISAAC AND JACOB , THE BRANCH , MELCHIZEDEK , ETC... ) ? DID THE FATHER GIVE THE TORAH TO THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL ? JOHN 5:37 , And the Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. Ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape. THE ONE WHO GAVE THE TORAH TO THE CHILDREN OF ISRAELL WAS THE ONE WHO WOULD LATER COME IN THE FLESH , WITH THE NAME JESUS . UNDERSTAND THE STRUCTURE OF THE GOVERNMENT OF GOD ; WHICH REQUIRE THE ATONEMENT FOR SIN , WHICH GOES THROUGH A PRIESTHOOD ; WHICH WAS FROM THE BEGINNING OF THE CREATION ( ADAM ) . GENESIS 1:26 , And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. GENESIS 14:18 , And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine: and he was the priest of the most high God. ONE OF THE NAMES AND TITLE OF THIS GOD THAT CREATED ALL THINGS IS MELCHIZEDEK ; WHICH HAST INTERCEDED FOR MAN FROM THE BEGINNING THROUGH FAITH , TO THE OTHER GOD WE NOW CALL THE FATHER . SHALOM !

@joshuamelton9148 3 ай бұрын

Very informative as always. The Presuppositions of the Hebrew roots is flaw.

@freedominchrist444 3 ай бұрын

The Way so misrepresents biblical Christianity. I have the dvd and I have seen what they post on church doors on reformation day. I read part of their book and honestly the author has little knowledge of basic Christianity, basic principals of heremenutics. He claims his book is apologetic book for the doctrines of the torah movement. Very poor arguments. I do not think he has any understanding of true apologetics at all. If I was still part of the torah movement I would be embarrased by his book (that I could not even finish) that claims to be an apologetic for the torah movement.

@kimartist 3 ай бұрын

It will be interesting to see if some of these kids will be able to come out of Torahism once indoctrinated 😢

@kimartist 3 ай бұрын

🪤

@solitairecat1 3 ай бұрын

Judging from some of the comments it appears they have been made blind by returning to the law, like the Scribes and Pharisees.

@kimartist 3 ай бұрын

@@solitairecat1 Yes, Paul's caveat seems to be in effect: "But their minds were made dull, for to this day the same veil remains when the old covenant is read. It has not been removed, because only in Christ is it taken away. Even to this day when Moses is read, a veil covers their hearts. But whenever anyone turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away." ~ 2 Corinthians 3 : 14-16

@solitairecat1 3 ай бұрын

@@kimartist Perfect verse! Thank you

@salpezzino7803 3 ай бұрын

@@kimartist we all were Blind until God opened our Minds. However God uses Cults and false churches to keep the Goats out of His Bride

@leroybroun4106 3 ай бұрын

@TheBiblicalRoots Regarding #4-"Everlasting Law", Mat 5:17-18 says the law will not pass away "...until it is fulfilled". Also, a fulfilled contract can still be everlasting: 1) it exists as Active while it is being executed and 2) it exists as Inactive when all terms have been fulfilled. For example, my past mortgage contracts still exist as a matter of record but since i've paid off the balance (fulfilled it) i am NOT continuing to make those mortgage payment, that would be silly, the bank would send my payments back with a reminder that that contract has been fulfilled.

@king_____geo273 3 ай бұрын

So is it the same way you would fulfill your dreams

@salpezzino7803 3 ай бұрын

Doesn't tale much of an IQ to understand that one is the Old Covenant and the other is the New Covenant. The Mosaic law was conditional and Israel broke it.

@leroybroun4106 3 ай бұрын

@@king_____geo273 not sure if ur just being light and funny, if u r it did make me smile. if ur not, a dream is not a contract. those u can fulfill anyway u want, i guess.

@king_____geo273 3 ай бұрын

@@leroybroun4106 fulfill is fulfil anyway you look at it, even when a contract is fulfilled isn't the contact still valid or in existence,it is not forgotten or insignificant. Is that funny?

@leroybroun4106 3 ай бұрын

@@king_____geo273 that's not funny, just irrational. go ahead and live out that idea. continue to pay for stuff you already paid in full, just don't hack my bank account.

@vernmiroth1626 2 ай бұрын

"...they derogatorily refer to the church as "churchianity"..." So I'm sure in your view that term you coined "Torahism " is not meant derogatorily?

@FeastDayFaith 2 ай бұрын

Exactly. Professor Solberg would have you believe he is tolerant and has no qualms with keeping the Torah, feast days, and Sabbath. But his tone and language indicate otherwise

@michaelbrutsche75 2 ай бұрын

Is it permissible for a believer to not murder their brother?

@dmoffitt1914 2 ай бұрын

I have a simple but two-part question... If I ask Paul what should I do to receive eternal life? What would be his answer? Now with that answer in mind... If I ask Jesus, what should I do to receive eternal life? What would his answer be?

@dancingzolins6782 2 ай бұрын

Paul: Romans 2:7, Romans 5:21, Romans 6:22-23, Jesus: John 3:14-16, John 3:36, John 5:24, John 6:40,47

@dmoffitt1914 2 ай бұрын

@@dancingzolins6782 surprised you didn't add Luke 18:18-27 or Matthew 19:16-26.

@dancingzolins6782 2 ай бұрын

@@dmoffitt1914 They were too obvious. 🙂

@dmoffitt1914 2 ай бұрын

@@dancingzolins6782 😁

@TGYTS 9 күн бұрын

Personally, I think there is a gaping and blatant logical fallacy within Christianity and ESPECIALLY Torah. I have never heard anyone address it. It is as follows: Contractually, YHWH was bound to bless anyone who obeyed all the commandments. How then, is Jesus cursed? Does the cursing of a perfect practitioner of torah nullify the terms of the contract? And if Jesus, being perfectly observant, was cursed, what makes us think we could be blessed by our (admittedly imperfect) observance?

@michaelbrutsche75 2 ай бұрын

Your contradicting yourself. Your saying that it is both permissible and a blatant declaration of not trusting in the sacrifice of Jesus to observe the shadow of Colossians 2. The reason the sabbath of Colossians 2 is a shadow is because it contained sacrifices that represented the sacrifice of Jesus.

@michaelbrutsche75 2 ай бұрын

Is it permissible for a believer to anticipate the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus though it has already taken place ?

@Gr8fullheartfullofgr8ce Ай бұрын

If your not in Christ your bound by the law therefore the law is still in effect for the unbelievers..

@dmoffitt1914 2 ай бұрын

I'm not understanding. It seems hypocritical because Christianity is somewhat doing the same thing, in regards to the optionality. They just used the word torahism, legalism and heresy.

@beckyfrechette4439 3 ай бұрын

The Way documentary was originally going to be ALL about circumcision! Literally promoting it! They were advised against it and instead, just included a segment where this guy talks about how he circumcised HIMSELF in his bath tub! Well, he ended up in the ER and the psych unit🤦‍♀️ He was laughing as he told the story. I had bought the download version of the documentary as soon as it was released and watched it right away, however, when I watched it months later at a gathering, it did not notice that segment. I believe they edited it out when it came out on DVD. Incredibly dangerous and irresponsible of them to have included that segment and a blatant disregard of scripture in general regarding the topic of circumcision!

@kimartist 3 ай бұрын

😮 These people are crazy.

@6969smurfy 3 ай бұрын

@beckyfrechette4439 really? sounds like a story your telling,

@6969smurfy 3 ай бұрын

@kimartist crazy for Thy Word! Thanks Religion man.

@kimartist 2 ай бұрын

@@6969smurfy Convince us by telling us your conversion story (if you have one, which is doubtful).

@travisambers6307 Ай бұрын

Q #1: Yes, Jesus was born under the Law (Gal 4:4) but that does not somehow indicate we are not. Most likely it is indicating 2 of the context clues of prophecy about Jesus - #1 born of a woman and #2 born under the law/He is a Hebrew. It doesn't somehow mean "Jesus was born under the law and now no believers are born under the Law" Romans is a beautiful letter that after reading it for the past few weeks really seems to be leaning more towards keeping the Law. Many verses in Romans, when taken in isolation, can be skewed to either side. Romans 7:14, Romans 7:16, Romans 7:22 all seem to support a Law abiding life and equating the Law with righteousness and holiness. So I think we can agree that the book of Romans should probably be taken as a whole. When you look at it as a whole, Paul seems to be saying that sin took an opportunity when the Law came and was able to work more sin in a human life - kind of like if someone tells you not to think of a pink elephant, it's going to be near impossible to not think of a pink elephant. But I bet you were not thinking about that pink elephant until someone told you not to, it wasn't even really a temptation. He seems to be talking about how because we are unable to keep the law perfectly we are under the law's penalty - which is to suffer the second death (everyone, even perfect Jesus, suffers the first, only a righteous person can escape the second death...ehem only Jesus and God gave Jesus the authority to resurrect those who are His). But now that we are under grace!!!! (the definition of grace is, according to merriam webster: unmerited divine assistance given to humans for their regeneration or sanctification) we are no longer under the law. The opposite of grace is not law. The opposite of grace is getting what we deserve which is the second death. The context here is allowing us to see that Paul is saying we are no longer under the penalty of the law, death, we are under grace, life. He even continues to constantly uphold the Law in Romans - just because you no longer have to suffer the second death, don't take that generosity and then heap up more sin! Romans states the Law is righteous and holy and good AND spiritual but that our sinful bodies are carnal and unclean. I think of what Paul is saying as this: You live in a state that has a specific code of law. You break the law. You have the choice between two judges: one who will use the law to make sure you reap every consequence that he can enforce using the law, or a judge who you know will try to show you grace at every opportunity - but expect that you will not take advantage of that but instead live according to the law from here on out.

@travisambers6307 Ай бұрын

Q#2: I also agree that Scripture does not forbid the celebrating of the feasts (in fact I think it commands it, no, I don't think all mainstream Christians are going to hell for celebrating Christmas and Easter). However, your response seems inconsistent with other times (it is so difficult to type and not speak as you cannot hear my tone, but I am saying all of this respectfully) you have stated things like "we aren't able to follow the Gospel and the Law at the same time" or "In other words, if Christians were to try to keep both the Torah and the law of Christ, we would be committing spiritual adultery!" It seems you vacillate between law keeping as neutral (as long as you don't believe it is the standard for all believers) and it being wrong (spiritual adultery). Colossians 2:16 is a fun verse as it is so ambiguous - it seems you can use it for law keeping (let no one judge you for keeping the law) and law breaking (let no one judge you for not keeping the law). But again, if you read the whole book, Paul describes these opposers: they use philosophy and empty deceit, follow/teach traditions of men, follow the basic principles of this world, were judging the colossian believers, cheating the colossians of their reward, took delight in false humility, worshiped angels, intruded on things they hadn't seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind, didn't hold fast to the head(Christ), their regulations were "do not touch, do not taste, do not handle" (commandments and doctrines of men), appearance of wisdom in self imposed religion, false humility, and they neglected their body (which had no value against he indulgence of the flesh). These people were not worshiping God, they were worshiping angels. They were not following God's commandments but the doctrines of men. They were not ok with feasting/celebrating but depriving the body. With that context, verse 16 seems to indicate that the Colossians were being judged for celebrating and feasting and keeping the Holy Days. There is more with that verse however. I enjoy using Blue Letter Bible and if you use the LXX version and type in Colossians 2:16 you'll see that one word was changed from the original greek - from the original greek word και (meaning and) to the greek word ή (meaning or). This change happens here: between food & drink. However, again if you use BLB, food & drink are maybe more accurately translated as "eating and drinking". So you have: Therefore no one is to act as your judge in regard to eating AND drinking...now comes the more interesting part! The next greek word is ή which can be translated or/either. If you use either here (which some eng-greek lexicons say that a list of ή ...ή ...ή ... the first one would be translated "either" and the rest would be translated "or") it would read thus: Therefore no one is to act as your judge in regard to eating and drinking either in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day. This fits with the context of who the opposers were (angel worshippers who followed doctrines of men who dealth harshly with their physical bodies) and fits the context of feasts and sabbaths were celebrations - lots of good food and drink.

@mv3261 3 ай бұрын

Jesus Christ is the fulfilment of the Sabbath, offering a spiritual rest that transcends the physical observance of one day a week. Matthew 11:28-30 Jesus says, "Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light." This passage highlights the rest that Jesus offers to those who come to Him, implying a rest from the labour of trying to keep and observe the Law. If keeping the law could save us, then animal sacrifices would remain sufficient, and Christ's death and resurrection would be in vain. Hebrews 4:9-10 "So then, there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God, for whoever has entered God's rest has also rested from his works as God did from his." Here, the author of Hebrews explains that believers enter an eternal spiritual rest through faith in Jesus, paralleling God’s rest after creation. Those who did not believe did not enter the promised land. God's rest is also in continues state, and so is our redemption and salvation, which is a continuous state every day. The Holy Spirit is our guarantee of purchase, God's stamp of approval and sign of the covenant, replacing physical circumcision or esteeming one day over another. Although rest and circumcision might have physical benefits, keeping them is allowed but no longer required under God's new covenant. 2 Corinthians 1:21-22 "Now it is God who makes both us and you stand firm in Christ. He anointed us, set his seal of ownership on us, and put his Spirit in our hearts as a deposit, guaranteeing what is to come." Ephesians 1:13-14 "And you also were included in Christ when you heard the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation. When you believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit, who is a deposit guaranteeing our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God’s possession-to the praise of his glory." 2 Corinthians 5:5 "Now the one who has fashioned us for this very purpose is God, who has given us the Spirit as a deposit, guaranteeing what is to come." These passages affirm that the Holy Spirit is given to believers as a guarantee or a deposit, signifying God's promise, ensuring our future inheritance and eternal rest in Christ under the new covenant. Colossians 2:16-17 "Therefore let no one pass judgment on you in questions of food and drink, or with regard to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath. These are a shadow of the things to come, but the substance belongs to Christ." This passage teaches that the Sabbath and other ceremonial laws were a shadow pointing to Christ, who fulfils their true meaning. Romans 10:4 "For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes." Christ's death, burial, and resurrection established the end of the Law and the old covenant as a means of attaining righteousness, which includes the Sabbath laws and establishes a new priesthood under a new covenant of grace and faith called God’s Israel (Galatians 6:15-16). Therefore, the old law remains applicable to anyone outside of the new covenant through Christ Jesus, including the unsaved and those who have no part in the body of Christ! 1 Timothy 1:8-11 "Now we know that the law is good, if one uses it lawfully, understanding this, that the law is not laid down for the just but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who strike their fathers and mothers, for murderers, the sexually immoral, men who practice homosexuality, enslavers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine, in accordance with the gospel of the glory of the blessed God with which I have been entrusted." This passage emphasizes that the law is good when used lawfully, with the purpose to point out our sinful condition, making our sin exceedingly sinful in God’s sight, declaring everyone punishable by God. The Law is meant to guide our behaviour and to convict us of sin, highlighting the need for grace and a redeemer. Galatians 3:24-25 "So then, the law was our guardian until Christ came, in order that we might be justified by faith. But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian." The Law, including the Sabbath, pointed us to Christ Jesus and the new covenant, but now believers are justified by faith and not by the works of the Law or their own abilities. There is no more place for the old covenant for those who were purchased and brought under the new covenant. John 15:1-5 "I am the true vine, and my Father is the vinedresser. Every branch in me that does not bear fruit he takes away, and every branch that does bear fruit he prunes, that it may bear more fruit. Already you are clean because of the word that I have spoken to you. Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit by itself, unless it abides in the vine, neither can you, unless you abide in me. I am the vine; you are the branches. Whoever abides in me and I in him, he it is that bears much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing." This passage teaches that Christ is the true vine into which believers are grafted, signifying their union with Him and their dependence on Him for spiritual life, fruitfulness, and salvation. Furthermore, the concept of being grafted into Christ, the true vine, underscores the intimate relationship, continues rest and unity believers have with Him, highlighting their complete dependence on Him for spiritual sustenance, growth, righteousness, and eternal rest. Believers in Christ will bear good fruit and good works because they are saved and changed. Christ also keeps us, not the other way around, where we do good works in order to gain favour or keep our salvation. If we could lose our salvation, we would, and God, who loves us, knows this. Therefore, He kept it very simple yet amazing, He is the author and the keeper of our faith. To rest, to be circumcised, and to worship God on a specific day might be beneficial since the Sabbath was made for man unto a sign of promise. However, these things are no longer required under the new covenant where Christ Jesus is our high priest, the manifested promise, and the Holy Spirit is our sign of covenant. We are saved by our faith, through grace; it is the gift from God, not of our works, so that no man can boast in his own ability or his own doing. Our best efforts are as filthy rags before our Holy and Just God. Attempting to bribe God with our works of self-righteousness is not scriptural, and our God is not bribed by men. Ephesians 2:8-9 "For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast."

@YahuahsTroops 3 ай бұрын

If Jesus is our sabbath why does He tell us to pray our flight is not on Sabbath, during the great tribulation?? Matthew 24:20 “And pray that your flight does not take place in winter or on the Sabbath. Matthew 24:21 “For then there shall be great distress, such as has not been since the beginning of the world until this time, no, nor ever shall be. Hebrews 4:11 Let us therefore do our utmost to enter into that rest, lest anyone fall after the same example of disobedience. Why does the writer of Hebrews tell us those who do not enter into that rest are examples of disobedience?

@kimartist 2 ай бұрын

@@YahuahsTroops "Then let those who are in JUDEA flee to the mountains..." ~ Matthew 24:16

@YahuahsTroops 2 ай бұрын

@@kimartist hmm yes I can see where you are confused, cause it can seem like they were talking about that time when they fleed then However, if we diligently pay attention to what Jesus was commanding us in Matthew 24:20 about “pray that your flight is not on the sabbath” If we read the next verse, The very next verse after Matthew 24:20, which would be Matthew 24:21 -it’s says “For then there shall be great distress,such as has not been since the beginning of the world until this time, no, nor ever shall be.” So that being said, that has yet to happen -So if we listen to Jesus and what he commands us we should still at this very moment, be praying our flight is not on the sabbath or in winter -like he told us to in the verse above THUS, Jesus was implying the Sabbath day is still in effect. And it is for everyone, not just Jews. Maybe that’s why the 4th command is “remember” the sabbath day -cause He knew we would forget it Shalom and I pray our flight does not take place on the Sabbath or in Winter. Have a blessed day❤️

@kimartist 2 ай бұрын

@@YahuahsTroops You are a sloppy scholar. Matthew 26 : 20 says: "When evening came, Jesus was reclining at the table with the Twelve." Matthew 26 : 21 says: "And while they were eating, he said, 'Truly I tell you, one of you will betray me.'" Matthew 24 : 1 & 2 says: "Jesus left the temple and was walking away when his disciples came up to him to call his attention to its buildings. 'Do you see all these things?' he asked. 'Truly I tell you, not one stone here will be left on another; every one will be thrown down.'" Clearly Jesus is speaking of/prophesying about the soon-coming destruction of the Temple in Matthew 24. "Some, having fallen short of these things, have wandered away into senseless babble, wishing to be teachers of the law even though they do not understand either what they are saying or concerning what things they are so dogmatically asserting." ~ 1 Timothy 1: 6-7

@YahuahsTroops 2 ай бұрын

@@kimartist good thing I’m not a scholar and I am a child of our Heavenly Father. I’m not perfect and in need of a Savior, But I strive to be like He tells us too: Matthew 5:48 “Therefore, be perfect, as your Father in the heavens is perfect.” Thank you Yahuah through His son Yahusha for blessing the 7th day for us to rest. Have a blessed upcoming Sabbath ❤️

@MelissaMcLauglin 3 ай бұрын

Excellent. Thank you again for your thoughtful, kind and correct rebuttal of this false teaching. Jesus + nothing= salvation. It is a gift. We are free from sin not free to sin. 🙌🏼🙏🏻✝️

@johnkumah3095 2 ай бұрын

The Law is a total 613 commandments. They won't be able to to fulfil it all even if they tried.

@jaimeandmatt 3 ай бұрын

I really appreciate your videos and wonder if you’ve ever done a thoughtful response to @Truthunedited ? I can’t quite place what this channel is exactly but I feel like Hebrew Roots plays a large part in its theology. Thoughts?

@TheBiblicalRoots 3 ай бұрын

Hi, Jaime and Matt! I have not responded to any of their teachings as of yet. But based on the statement of faith on their website, they do appear to be Hebrew Roots. The statement includes this: "We believe that we are redeemed to YAHUAH by the Law of Moses, but through belief in Yahusha the Messiah, we are all born again believers that live by the Grace of YAH." Blessings, RLS

@WeThePeople9069 3 ай бұрын

Anyone noticed the bright light starting at 37:17? 🤔

@l4lsilver655 Ай бұрын

There is a temple - there is not holy of holies

@notsatch 3 ай бұрын

On a slightly lighter note, imagine the outcry from PETA if everyone in the HRM built altars in their yards and started doing animal sacrifices, not to mention the concerns of their neighbors and more than a handful of municipalities! BTW, I finally broke down and ordered Torahism today. Looking forward to reading it.

@jimharmon2300 3 ай бұрын

Jesus took away nor added to any laws . Matthew 5:18 (KJV) For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. His teachings were from the old scriptures not misunderstanding of Paul’s writings. If your teachings does not agree with the words of the Prophets you are not following Jesus nor The FATHER. You have created a false idol in your own heart by transforming Jesus into something that he is not .

@solitairecat1 3 ай бұрын

@@jimharmon2300 And he said in verse 17 he came to fulfill the law.

@jimharmon2300 3 ай бұрын

@@solitairecat1 Read what Jesus said . He came to clarify not do away with or add to . Isaiah 30:1 (KJV) Woe to the rebellious children, saith the LORD, that take counsel, but not of me; and that cover with a covering, but not of my spirit, that they may add sin to sin: You eat unclean meat . Then don’t honor the Sabbath. Then worship “ GOD The FATHER’s “ messenger . Jesus tells us about himself . What Jesus Came To Do Separate tares from the wheat Matthew 13:40 (KJV) As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world. Did not come to send peace Matthew 10:34 (KJV) Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. Division Matthew 10:35 (KJV) For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. Luke 12:53 (KJV) The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. As you can see These things he has done . His assignment is fulfilled , finished. Matthew 12:50 (KJV) For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother. He does not say he will be your GOD or replace the FATHER.

@jimharmon2300 3 ай бұрын

@solitairecat1 3 ай бұрын

@@jimharmon2300 Matt 5:17 does say 'fulfill'. The Hebrew מלא means 'fill, full' (Strong's H4390). When Yahshua read Isaiah 61:1 proclaiming the favourable year of Yahweh, he said "today this scripture is fulfilled מלא in your hearing" Luke 4:16 - 21. He fulfilled Isa 42:1 as stated in Matt 12:18 "Here is My Servant, whom I have chosen, My beloved, in whom My soul delights. I will put My Spirit on Him, and He will proclaim justice to the nations." Yahshua fulfilling the law doesn't replace Yahweh as our Father, but provides the means by which we can stand before God blameless.

@arditienthusiast8384 3 ай бұрын

If you are a Torah keeper who doesn't sacrifice bulls and goats you're a hypocrite. No argument.

@bringstolight 3 ай бұрын

lol

@t.scottmajor1316 3 ай бұрын

Kinda like Daniel and the rest of the exiles?

@joshuamelton9148 3 ай бұрын

Israel was in exile because of their disobedience. Its the blessings and curaes part of the Suzerain Treaty coming to play@@t.scottmajor1316

@2ndyeardrummer 3 ай бұрын

How so? God has provided us with a sacrifice that is sufficient for the atonement of all sin covered in the blood of Christ.

@arditienthusiast8384 3 ай бұрын

@@2ndyeardrummer Correct, He did, which is one of the reasons we don't keep Torah under the new covenant. However I'm pointing out that Leviticus is part of the Torah and those that claim it must still be followed can't wiggle out from under keeping the whole thing if that's their claim. I just find it interesting that those who claim we should keep it and claim to keep it themselves try to cope argue out from under the one part that really rubs up against modern sensibility and law.

@byronshipp3454 2 ай бұрын

Romans 3:31 speaks against most of what you are defending.

@johnmann8659 2 ай бұрын

@byronshipp3454 Those that have the law (Romans 9:4) are to uphold the law (Romans 3:31 -> Malachi 4:4-6).

@slavicstriz8715 3 ай бұрын

@jimharmon2300 3 ай бұрын

Noah knew clean from unclean animals when he loaded the Ark . GOD did not have to repeat to Noah what was clean and unclean because Noah knew . Like Peter with the sheet . He did not eat because he knew what GOD had commanded earlier. Peter wondered on the vision . The sheet was let down three times and Three gentiles came to the door . Peter then knew the meaning of the vision .

@freedominchrist444 3 ай бұрын

Noah was also told in Gen 9 he could eat any animal(the part torah folk skip and ignore)

@freedominchrist444 3 ай бұрын

And in the Hebrew it means any/all animals

@jimharmon2300 3 ай бұрын

@@freedominchrist444 Genesis 7:2 (KJV) Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that [are] not clean by two, the male and his female. Maybe Noah wasn’t as dumb as people are today , GOD did not have to repeat HIS words or commands .

@joshuamelton9148 3 ай бұрын

Dietary laws is not an universal law given to all nations and for all people groups for all times.

@jimharmon2300 3 ай бұрын

@@joshuamelton9148 Agree But it is the law of the sons of GOD . Wither you are a natural born or adopted.

@AndreColon 3 ай бұрын

Listen to what Jesus tells his disciples ... Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

@pierreferguson1300 3 ай бұрын

Exodus 31:14 “Therefore you are to keep the Sabbath, for it is holy to you. Everyone who profanes it must be put to death; for whoever does any work on it, that person shall be cut off from among his people. 15 For six days work may be done, but on the seventh day there is a Sabbath of complete rest [Exodus 20:8-11; Leviticus 23:1-3], holy to the Lord; whoever does any work on the Sabbath day must be put to death.“ (NASB) Exodus 35:1 Then Moses assembled all the congregation of the sons of Israel, and said to them, “These are the things that the Lord has commanded you to do: 2 “For six days work may be done, but on the seventh day you shall have a holy day, a Sabbath of complete rest to the Lord [Exodus 20:8-11; Leviticus 23:1-3]; whoever does any work on it shall be put to death.“ (NASB) Numbers 15:32 Now while the sons of Israel were in the wilderness [Heb. midbar], they found a man gathering wood on the Sabbath day [Exodus 20:8-11; Leviticus 23:1-3]. 33 And those who found him gathering wood brought him to Moses and Aaron, and to all the congregation; 34 and they placed him in custody, because it had not been decided what should be done to him. 35 Then the Lord said to Moses, “The man must be put to death [Exodus 31:14-15; Exodus 35:1-2; Deuteronomy 27:26; Matthew 5:18]; all the congregation shall stone him with stones outside the camp.” 36 So all the congregation [Heb. edah] brought him outside the camp and stoned him to death with stones, just as the Lord had commanded Moses. (NASB) Matthew 5:18 “For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke of a letter shall pass from the Law, until all is accomplished!“ (NASB)

@michaelbrutsche75 3 ай бұрын

Jesus does not permit the holding of feasts that anticipate the death, burial and resurrection of a Messiah by believers! Jesus does not say to the believer that he can both expect/anticipate and accept His sacrifice!

@solitairecat1 3 ай бұрын

Great Bible based discourse against returning to the Law.

@mauricetravis868 3 ай бұрын

❤❤❤❤

@beckyfrechette4439 3 ай бұрын

Paul actually spent a total of 17 YEARS away from Jerusalem!

@batminton7467 Ай бұрын

these arguments stink ... they all imply: "because I said so". and the interpretation of many verses out of context makes it even worse

@scottfrance1400 2 ай бұрын

Hi professsor Solberg ,i have the answer for you to it all of the "why" It is in Ezekiel 20:13-26 The law given to the Jewish, who were led out of Egypt, and they didnt obey it. *they didnt follow his decrees *they desecrated the Sabbaths They lusted after idols . (GOLDEN CALF MOMENT) God had all their lives ended . God kept their children alive and told them not to do as their parents done giving them a chance . The children didnt obey the law *they didnt follow the decrees *they desecrated the Sabbaths *they lusted after idols . God held up his hand and swore he would destroy them all. But the save his name being profaned he kept them alive. Then this is what God says take careful notice So I gave them other statutes that were not good and laws through which they could not live; 26 I defiled them through their gifts-the sacrifice of every firstborn-that I might fill them with horror so they would know that I am the Lord.’ This is why horror after horror keeps coming upon israel . (Because of the law), it is bringing these horrors like the holocaust upon them and now october 7th and this war ,and many others . This is also why Jesus died, it was to save people following the law from these horrors ,( it's on anyone who follows the law), and Jesus himself took all the horrors and punishment onto himself , that is why Jesus went through such a terrible ending . And that is why he layed down his life. To save us all from the horrors coming upon us that we may have life and have it abundantly. God also says in Ezekiel 20:15 that they are not in the land that was destined for them , (they are meant to be in the land of milk and honey . Which they claim israel to be but it is not . Anyone under the law is in a very bad position . The horrors right across the world would end tomorrow (if everyone made a sealed confession tomorrow) ,confessing their sins in Jesus name.

@Wisdoms_Inheritance 3 ай бұрын

No law, no transgression - Romans 4:15, in order for Adam to have transgressed - Romans 5:14, there had to have been a regulation in place, was it okay for Adam to worship other Gods back then? Is incest okay now as long as you're married? The whole idea of people not wanting to keep God's law is ridiculous! The righteousness of the law can be fulfilled in us if we keep it through the Spirit - Romans 8:4, if you're not keeping what still applies (food, sabbath, sexual morality etc...) his Spirit isn't in you because you're not obedient. The law isn't required for SALVATION, but it is required for righteous living, Christ only gave one new commandment - John 13:34 and it's a renewed commandment of brotherly love. The bible NEVER says all food is clean, if all food was clean, there would be no more poisonous plants or animals high in toxicity, with which we could defile our temples.

@BraydenBelt 3 ай бұрын

Literally twisting scripture dude. You are making way too many assumptions into the text. Sin existed before the law was ever given. Food laws never applied to gentiles in the first place so why do they now?

@Wisdoms_Inheritance 3 ай бұрын

@@BraydenBelt What scripture did I twist? What assumptions? I quoted text and asked questions, did I add anything? How can sin or transgression exist without a law or regulation? I often here that, but are Gentiles Jews inwardly now - Romans 2:28-29? Are Gentiles graffed in with Israel - Romans 11:11-17? Were not Gentiles once aliens from the common wealth, but in Christ is one new man both of Jews and Gentiles, both having access to the Father by the same Spirit, Gentiles now being fellowcitizens with the saints - Ephesians 2:12-19? This is why it applies, or are these all assumptions?

@debblouin 3 ай бұрын

You are conflating moral laws and ceremonial laws and rituals which pointed to Jesus.

@Wisdoms_Inheritance 3 ай бұрын

@@debblouin You accuse me of something but offer no explanation!

@messengerisrael3817 3 ай бұрын

@@BraydenBelt !. WHAT LAW WAS JESUS BORN UNDER ? You must understand that there is more than one law ; In the bible three type of laws are talked about : 1. The laws/commandments/instructions of the Father ; which includes all the covenants ; these are instructions to righteousness ; that is why when the man asked Jesus , what good things shall I do , that I may have eternal life ? Jesus said , " KEEP THE COMMANDMENTS " . 2. The law of the mediators ( law of Moses and the law of Christ ) , which are sin sacrifices through a priesthood , to recover you when you transgress the laws of the Father ; remember , the covenants are between the Father and the covenant people ( children of Israel ; believing Gentiles are grafted into the covenant through faith in Jesus ) . The mediators intercedes for the people ; they do not change the covenants . Israel is the only nation to have made a covenant with the Father . The Gentiles are not under the Father's law , but under Christ law ; which is the mediator of the covenant ; which also recover the Israelites from their transgressions against the Father's law . The law through the mediator Moses ( sometimes called the law of Moses , because it came through the husband/protector Moses ) was the blood of the animals and oblations ; which was carried out by the Leviticus priesthood . This law was the law of works , not of faith ( Romans 3:27-28 , " Where is boasting then ? It is excluded . By what law ? of works ? Nay: but by the law of faith . Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law " ) . The law of faith ( sometimes called the law of Christ , because it came under the husband/protector Jesus Christ ) is the blood of Jesus Christ through faith ; Which means that you must repent of your sins with a sorrowful heart ( mind ) , like king David did , and believe by obedience ; that means keeping your mediator ( Jesus Christ ) commandments ; which are the same laws/instructions/ commandments of the Father . MATTHEW 8:1-4 , 1.When he was come down from the mountain, great multitudes followed him. 2And, behold, there came a leper and worshipped him, saying, Lord, if thou wilt, thou canst make me clean. 3And Jesus put forth his hand, and touched him, saying, I will; be thou clean. And immediately his leprosy was cleansed. 4And Jesus saith unto him, See thou tell no man; but go thy way, shew thyself to the priest, and offer the gift that Moses commanded, for a testimony unto them. THIS IS THAT GIFT : LEVITICUS 14:1-32 , 1.And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, 2This shall be the law of the leper in the day of his cleansing: He shall be brought unto the priest: 3And the priest shall go forth out of the camp; and the priest shall look, and, behold, if the plague of leprosy be healed in the leper; 4Then shall the priest command to take for him that is to be cleansed two birds alive and clean, and cedar wood, and scarlet, and hyssop: 5And the priest shall command that one of the birds be killed in an earthen vessel over running water: 6As for the living bird, he shall take it, and the cedar wood, and the scarlet, and the hyssop, and shall dip them and the living bird in the blood of the bird that was killed over the running water: 7And he shall sprinkle upon him that is to be cleansed from the leprosy seven times, and shall pronounce him clean, and shall let the living bird loose into the open field. 8And he that is to be cleansed shall wash his clothes, and shave off all his hair, and wash himself in water, that he may be clean: and after that he shall come into the camp, and shall tarry abroad out of his tent seven days. 9But it shall be on the seventh day, that he shall shave all his hair off his head and his beard and his eyebrows, even all his hair he shall shave off: and he shall wash his clothes, also he shall wash his flesh in water, and he shall be clean. 10And on the eighth day he shall take two he lambs without blemish, and one ewe lamb of the first year without blemish, and three tenth deals of fine flour for a meat offering, mingled with oil, and one log of oil. 11And the priest that maketh him clean shall present the man that is to be made clean, and those things, before the LORD, at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation: 12And the priest shall take one he lamb, and offer him for a trespass offering, and the log of oil, and wave them for a wave offering before the LORD: 13And he shall slay the lamb in the place where he shall kill the sin offering and the burnt offering, in the holy place: for as the sin offering is the priest's, so is the trespass offering: it is most holy: 14And the priest shall take some of the blood of the trespass offering, and the priest shall put it upon the tip of the right ear of him that is to be cleansed, and upon the thumb of his right hand, and upon the great toe of his right foot: 15And the priest shall take some of the log of oil, and pour it into the palm of his own left hand: 16And the priest shall dip his right finger in the oil that is in his left hand, and shall sprinkle of the oil with his finger seven times before the LORD: 17And of the rest of the oil that is in his hand shall the priest put upon the tip of the right ear of him that is to be cleansed, and upon the thumb of his right hand, and upon the great toe of his right foot, upon the blood of the trespass offering: 18And the remnant of the oil that is in the priest's hand he shall pour upon the head of him that is to be cleansed: and the priest shall make an atonement for him before the LORD. 19And the priest shall offer the sin offering, and make an atonement for him that is to be cleansed from his uncleanness; and afterward he shall kill the burnt offering: 20And the priest shall offer the burnt offering and the meat offering upon the altar: and the priest shall make an atonement for him, and he shall be clean. 21And if he be poor, and cannot get so much; then he shall take one lamb for a trespass offering to be waved, to make an atonement for him, and one tenth deal of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering, and a log of oil; 22And two turtledoves, or two young pigeons, such as he is able to get; and the one shall be a sin offering, and the other a burnt offering. 23And he shall bring them on the eighth day for his cleansing unto the priest, unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, before the LORD. 24And the priest shall take the lamb of the trespass offering, and the log of oil, and the priest shall wave them for a wave offering before the LORD: 25And he shall kill the lamb of the trespass offering, and the priest shall take some of the blood of the trespass offering, and put it upon the tip of the right ear of him that is to be cleansed, and upon the thumb of his right hand, and upon the great toe of his right foot: 26And the priest shall pour of the oil into the palm of his own left hand: 27And the priest shall sprinkle with his right finger some of the oil that is in his left hand seven times before the LORD: 28And the priest shall put of the oil that is in his hand upon the tip of the right ear of him that is to be cleansed, and upon the thumb of his right hand, and upon the great toe of his right foot, upon the place of the blood of the trespass offering: 29And the rest of the oil that is in the priest's hand he shall put upon the head of him that is to be cleansed, to make an atonement for him before the LORD. 30And he shall offer the one of the turtledoves, or of the young pigeons, such as he can get; 31Even such as he is able to get, the one for a sin offering, and the other for a burnt offering, with the meat offering: and the priest shall make an atonement for him that is to be cleansed before the LORD. 32This is the law of him in whom is the plague of leprosy, whose hand is not able to get that which pertaineth to his cleansing. JESUS WAS BORN UNDER THE LAW OF MOSES , OR THE LAW OF ANIMAL SACRIFICE & OBLATIONS . THE GOD OF ISRAEL LAWS LAST FOREVER ( PSALM 111:1-8 ) ; THE LAW OF WORKS HE GAVE THROUGH THE MEDIATOR MOSES , WAS REPLACED BY THE LAW OF FAITH THROUGH THE MEDIATOR JESUS CHRIST . THE APOSTLE PETER STATED THAT SOME OF PAUL WRITINGS AND OTHER SCRIPTURES ARE SOMRTIMES HARD TO BE UNDERSTOOD . SHALOM !

@6969smurfy Ай бұрын

You don’t know Thy Father if you Don’t HEART Torah, And that’s 100% of Messiahs Teachings!

@TheBiblicalRoots Ай бұрын

He taught lots of Torah truth, Smurf, but it didn't make up 100% of Messiah's teachings. Jesus also taught some new commandments that weren't in the Torah. For example, the series of "You have heard it said...but I say to you" statements in Matthew 5 are new. And the many times He commands us to "Follow me" don't come from the Torah. And there's also, "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you." (Matt. 28:19-20) And interestingly, if we were to teach people "all that Jesus have commanded," it would not include the whole Law of Moses. For example, he never commanded anyone to make animal sacrifices for sin, keep the feasts, eat kosher, or even keep the seventh day Sabbath. RLS

@6969smurfy Ай бұрын

@TheBiblicalRoots , Rob YAHshua was defining Fathers Word. Adultery, even looking. Wantingly falls under this Torah Instruction of Adultery. NOTHING NEW HERE. All Messiahs Teachings are 100% Torah. ALL.....

@6969smurfy Ай бұрын

@TheBiblicalRoots interestingly. Why would HE Messiah have to reword all of Torah, He would Just send you to The Senegag on the sabbath To learn for yourself. Oh wait, that was the ruling in acts fifteen said to do.... I guess it was communicated to the Heart seekers.

@Eric-fq5wx 3 ай бұрын

You seem to be avoiding the very definition of sin found in the new testament. 1Jn 3:4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. You correctly say that disobeying God is sin but His commandments are his express will. The only reason paul can seemingly contradict himself by saying things like romans 3:28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law. and then concluding a few verses later with verse 31 Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law. Is because he is refering to two different laws. The penalty or sacrifices that can never make us clean have been done away with. But the commandments are eternal. Which is why hebrews 10 says if we continue transgressing the law after we have knowledge of the truth, there remains no more sacrifice for sins but a looking forward to judgment.

@AndreColon 3 ай бұрын

All his answer were, I felt, conjecture to say the least.. Especially the .. 'Everlasting & Sin definition' questions.

@salpezzino7803 3 ай бұрын

that law is NOT the law of Moses, we already knew that and have known that for 2000 years, what did you miss? I like Romans 3:27 Then what becomes of our boasting? It is excluded. By what kind of law? By a law of works? No, but by the law of faith. -- Not the law of works You seem confused, Torah Keepers will be judged by the law they claim to keep -- Not Good For Them -- They can't keep one of them - You cant keep the feasts as God Commanded --------------------- Damned

@Eric-fq5wx 3 ай бұрын

@@salpezzino7803 what are you going to say when jesus says to you mat 7:23 I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.

@salpezzino7803 3 ай бұрын

@@Eric-fq5wx You cultists crack me up. In Matthew 7 Jesus was speaking to Torah Keepers, it was still the Sermon on the Mount. Speaking about those who claim their works mean anything BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH You are truly in a cult for the low IQed Christians CAN'T be Lawless - Titus 2:14 who gave himself for us to redeem us from all lawlessness and to purify for himself a people for his own possession who are zealous for good works. I am Redeemed from ALL Lawlessness ---- Torah Keepers are the True Lawless Ones. they can't keep the law they claim to keep --------- CraZy right ---------- David is that you?

@pierreferguson1300 3 ай бұрын

Unbelief is sin - Hebrews 3.

@vernmiroth1626 3 ай бұрын

Question 7 is an especially egregious example of what Solberg is consistent about. He claims it is the questions that are not very well thought out..yet his answer is extremely brief and superficial

@elijahirvin5911 2 ай бұрын

Jews broke deut 4.2

@michaelbrutsche75 3 ай бұрын

We can see in Hebrews 11 that the promises were not yet received (Hebrews 11:13,39) and that we with them will receive the promises. V-40

@walkinginthegodgiven-jerem5502 2 ай бұрын

11:34 seriously. Peter eating with gentiles doesn’t mean he ate foods sacrificed to idols, or with blood, or strangled or against Leviticus. That is false. Read Jesus instruction to the 7 gentile churches in Asia in the book of Revelation. Again, using Peter’s protection of the LORD opposing the will of the father ignorantly is not at all proof to prove he again disobeyed God in Acts 10. Acts 10 was about humans only. Beast of the field, fowls of the air, and creeping things is the exact verbiage Hosea used in Hosea 2 to describe GOD saving people who were once not called his people. Solberg you are walking dangerous ground always quoting out of context.

@ScriptureFirst 3 ай бұрын

Insufficient development for complete logical conclusion on both sides. Multiple verses left out on every single one of these points. The snarling condescension toward the rapid fire brevity of the oc ironically applies to its own retort: don’t let this be the end of your examination: either way.

@simonskinner1450 3 ай бұрын

Sin has always been disobedience, versus the obedience of faith, therefore sin is the lack of faith. Since Moses sin is established as judicial condemnation, and still is Rob.

@6969smurfy 3 ай бұрын

Babylon speak, Rob, Babble.

@sundownsam 2 ай бұрын

Robert Solberg, you are responding with opinions and not with scriptural truth.

@karlcooke3197 3 ай бұрын

And where does it say, because we our Gentiles, that the Sabbath and Torah doesn't apply. When the Roman Catholic Church forced Gentiles to keep Sunday. You want to history.

@Nazarene_Judaism 3 ай бұрын

Acts 15 all of it. and Acts 21:25

@kimartist 3 ай бұрын

@KarlCooke3197 Where does it say in Torah that God made a covenant with the Gentiles?

@Nazarene_Judaism 3 ай бұрын

@@kimartist Noah was a gentile. Genesis 9:3-4 is the covenant to the Gentiles. Outside of Torah given to Israel the nations followed what was given to Noah. enjoy your pork.

@TheBiblicalRoots 3 ай бұрын

Hi, Karl! The Torah is a beautiful and fundamental part of our faith. In this video, I give four ways that it is still relevant to Christians. As far as Sabbath and the other rituals: "Do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ." (Col. 2:16-17) Shalom, RLS

@Nazarene_Judaism 3 ай бұрын

@@kimartist Read this here. This is the covenant for Gentiles.Genesis 9:3-4

@Bouncer83 2 ай бұрын

Isaiah 24 and Malachi 4. Either both are false prophets or we are supposed to follow the instructions of YAHUAH aka Torah or be on the receiving end of Judgement for being lawless. Yahushua didn't come to start a new religion with 1000s of denominations he came to point us back to the way which has always been the same for everybody. Obey the instructions of TMH. Rev 14:12 it says the commandments of YAHUAH and the testimony of Yahushua not just the testimony. Do we believe man or do we believe scripture? That's a prophecy btw and a message from an angel to John and after the Ascension of the Messiah so the commandments being done away with at the cross doesn't work. A wolf in sheep's clothing Rob , repent didn't suddenly mean apologise and stay sinning it meant to turn from our ways and obey the instructions of YAHUAH. Matthew 7:21-23 iniquity = lawlessness. What do we think Moses accusing is to the father means too? People disregard the words of Yahushua because they aren't his sheep. John 14 says we need to obey the commandments to receive the Holy Spirit too, how does one receive the Spirit if they don't do what the Messiah told us to do? Not 1 person that worships on Sunday and disregards the Sabbath has the Holy Spirit and the fact you don't do what Ezekiel and Jeremiah says we'd do when we receive it goes to show it's not the correct one. Do better Rob stop leading people astray from obeying TMH.

@johnmann8659 2 ай бұрын

@bouncer83 Malachi 4:4-6 applies to those that were at Mt. Horeb (Exodus 24:5-8). Jesus’ only audience was Israel (Matthew 15:21-28, Matthew 10:5-6). Paul was trusted with the instructions to non Jews. Ephesians 3:1 Romans 11:13 Acts 22:20-21 1 Timothy 2:7 2 Timothy 4:17 Galatians 1:16-17

@Bouncer83 2 ай бұрын

@@johnmann8659 You're a perfect example of someone that is taught the truth when it comes to scripture brother. Malachi is warning is. Israel = Yasharel it means the upright of El/God. Isaiah 24 says the world will be destroyed for not keeping the commandments and sabbath. The world and not just Israel going into captivity. The context must mean it was after the Messiah as that's only when the world was invited to join the covenant that modern religions do away with.

@johnmann8659 2 ай бұрын

@@Bouncer83 Israel is going into captivity one last time, yes. Revelation 13:10 Zechariah 14:1-3 Joel 3:1-12 Ezekiel 39:21-28 Luke 21:24 The Sabbath wouldn’t apply to Christians. Exodus 31:16-17 Colossians 2:16-17 Jubilees 2 Numbers 28:9-10

@Bouncer83 2 ай бұрын

@@johnmann8659 Israel will be regathered from the nation's next, no more captivity. That verse in Luke speaks of 70AD . The Sabbath applies to all of Gods people, it was the Sabbath from the beginning and will be the Sabbath till the end. Nobody changed it. If you ain't keeping the commandments you're not worshipping the God of the bible you're worshipping a lawless version that changes. Rev 22:14 that's for everyone there's no rapture for deceived Christians. We're supposed to be grafted into Israel and the covenants there's only 2 groups that's it.

@johnmann8659 2 ай бұрын

@@Bouncer83 Jesus didn't return and defeat the A.C. in 70 A.D. (2 Thessalonians 2:4-8). Israel's final captivity happens just before Jesus arrives via the clouds. Matthew 26:64 --> Luke 21:24-27 Israel is residing in their land before Jesus arrives (Revelation 7:1-8). Ruhama Avraham Shahar Isaac Simcha Jacobovici Rabbi Ovadia Yosef Molly Ephraim Carmela Menashe Rami Levy Rabbi Zamir Cohen Rabbi Yaron Reuven Paul Simon Gal Gadot Hananya Naftali Danny Danon Avi Issacharoff Rabbi Shlomo Yehuda Itay Zvulun Ben Binyamin Haim Moshe Joshua Aaron Larry David Berel Solomon Fleur Hassan Nahoum Mordechai Eliyahu Sagiv Yehezkel Roni Daniel Ron Ben Yishai Rami Gershon A.B. Yehoshua Gideon Ezra Dor Micha Adi Yona Dani Amos Eliyahu Baruchi Yitzhak Mordechai

@thelordyourgod 2 ай бұрын

So this is what Mr Batman believes in...

@king_____geo273 3 ай бұрын

This is amazing and very funny every question you addressed sounds like the deception in the garden of eden, you are the perfect person to show the ways that satan can put forward his deception,you are doing an amazing job. The only thing I know is I thank God for the bible and that it's my teacher because if I didn't know what it teaches you RL Solburg would lead me straight to HELL

@adamguy33 3 ай бұрын

Your so foolish and obviously a decieved person. You dont understand the truth because it is not in you. Rob not leading you to hell. That is where your going all on your own. Without the Holy Spirit you won't understand the bible anyway, that is why your not apart of the new covenant. If you were actually saved you'd understand the truth as Rob does

@simonskinner1450 3 ай бұрын

Rob, Peter sinned by probably eating meat sacrificed for idols, the circumcision knew he sinned, Paul knew he sinned, as the law has not changed and Peter fell from grace. There are two statutes as in Galatians 5 shows, those falling from grace who are under condemnation, and those who shall inherit the kingdom of heaven, the law of sin and death has not been changed by Jesus. The circumcision were right and converts needed to know by faith they must not sin.

@sourmilkministries9445 2 ай бұрын

👎 It literally took you less than one minute to CONFLATE the intrinsic progressive obedience that manifests in genuine followers of Christ - which is indeed _"the only correct way to follow Jesus"_ - with that of a SMALL number of people (not exclusive to the Hebrew Roots Movement) who foolishly think that their works somehow help to save them. Jesus: _"But why do you call Me 'Lord, Lord,' and not do the things which I say?"_ Solberg: _"Because obedience was optional"_ Is that what you're saying, professor? Of course, NOT! And, as such, that proves that you are indeed conflating TWO VERY DIFFERENT THINGS!

@walkinginthegodgiven-jerem5502 2 ай бұрын

PAUL WAS A PROPHET not an APOSTLE EQUAL TO THE 12. THE GOSPEL OF JESUS who walked the earth was foretold to be for all men. Great commission was for all men, of all races, from every nation. Jeremiah 16:19-21, Zechariah 2:11, Malachi 1:11, Isaiah 49:6-7, 42:1-, 56:3-8, 60:1-3, 61:1-11, Isaiah 66 Jesus came for Israel and gentiles.

@elijahrodgers416 3 ай бұрын

It doesn't have anything to do with Peter eating with Gentiles. Peter was to call no man unclean. (Isaiah 66:17) They that sanctify themselves, and purify themselves in the gardens behind one tree in the midst, eating swine's flesh, and the abomination, and the mouse, shall be consumed together, saith the LORD.

@walkinginthegodgiven-jerem5502 2 ай бұрын

29:41 such a lie. All foods are not clean. Read acts 15 and revelation to the 7 churches written to gentiles in Asia. These two arguments are in addition to GODS eternal law. PAUL can only teach what JESUS said on earth. So judge Paul’s writings compared to JESUS and Moses as Jesus said Moses was still valid and actually increased it. Read Duet 30:1-15. We are still in the farthest ends of the earth. We are waiting for GOD to gather us, Only those who keep HIS LAW WITH ALL OUR HEARTS will we qualify to be gathered back to the land of our fathers.

@Truth-f2q 3 ай бұрын

You're a false teacher of lawlessness and you have been refuted many times over.

@BraydenBelt 3 ай бұрын

By “refuted” you mean baseless arguments and scriptures being misinterpreted and twisted? Yeah that sounds about about right.

@jimharmon2300 3 ай бұрын

Isaiah 30:1 (KJV) Woe to the rebellious children, saith the LORD, that take counsel, but not of me; and that cover with a covering, but not of my spirit, that they may add sin to sin:

@tbishop4961 3 ай бұрын

You can tell that he is lawless by his Jack Sparrow style. I bet the reason we never see his lower half is that he's hiding a peg leg

@debblouin 3 ай бұрын

Why do you seek to be made perfect by the law?

@jimharmon2300 3 ай бұрын

@@debblouin Being obedient pleases GOD . How could you get to a destination without road signs for direction ? How can any civilization exist without laws ? Even savage people have their own laws . No one would be safe .

@6969smurfy 3 ай бұрын

Evey one of your rebuttals is wrong,...

@adamguy33 3 ай бұрын

Everyone of your comments are wrong, why? Because the new covenant is not a continuing of the old one with alittle JESUS sprinkled on top. Its a completely new covenant making the old obsolete. If you go to the old covenant that is obsolete and think your doing something right your just decieved and blinded by the evil one and your pridfull heart

@sethplace 3 ай бұрын

Oh snap. 😅

@adamguy33 3 ай бұрын

‭Galatians 2:4-6 NKJV‬ [4] And this occurred because of false brethren secretly brought in (who came in by stealth to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage), [5] to whom we did not yield submission even for an hour, that the truth of the gospel might continue with you. [6] But from those who seemed to be something-whatever they were, it makes no difference to me; God shows personal favoritism to no man-for those who seemed to be something added nothing to me.

@adamguy33 3 ай бұрын

‭Galatians 3:3-25 NKJV‬ [3] Are you so foolish? Having begun in the Spirit, are you now being made perfect by the flesh? [4] Have you suffered so many things in vain-if indeed it was in vain? [5] Therefore He who supplies the Spirit to you and works miracles among you, does He do it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?- [6] just as Abraham “believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.” [7] Therefore know that only those who are of faith are sons of Abraham. [8] And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel to Abraham beforehand, saying, “In you all the nations shall be blessed.” [9] So then those who are of faith are blessed with believing Abraham. [10] For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse; for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who does not continue in all things which are written in the book of the law, to do them.” [11] But that no one is justified by the law in the sight of God is evident, for “the just shall live by faith.” [12] Yet the law is not of faith, but “the man who does them shall live by them.” [13] Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us (for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree”),[14] that the blessing of Abraham might come upon the Gentiles in Christ Jesus, that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith. [15] Brethren, I speak in the manner of men: Though it is only a man’s covenant, yet if it is confirmed, no one annuls or adds to it. [16] Now to Abraham and his Seed were the promises made. He does not say, “And to seeds,” as of many, but as of one, “And to your Seed,” who is Christ. [17] And this I say, that the law, which was four hundred and thirty years later, cannot annul the covenant that was confirmed before by God in Christ, that it should make the promise of no effect. [18] For if the inheritance is of the law, it is no longer of promise; but God gave it to Abraham by promise. [19] What purpose then does the law serve? It was added because of transgressions, till the Seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was appointed through angels by the hand of a mediator. [20] Now a mediator does not mediate for one only, but God is one. [21] Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could have given life, truly righteousness would have been by the law. [22] But the Scripture has confined all under sin, that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe. [23] But before faith came, we were kept under guard by the law, kept for the faith which would afterward be revealed. [24] Therefore the law was our tutor to bring us to Christ, that we might be justified by faith. [25] But after faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor. All food laws , ceremonial laws and sabbath laws are done away with, only the moral laws stand. And even those we stumble and are not perfect morally, yet for us who are in Christ we shall never come into condemnation. For we have passed from death unto life

@harryabrahams2770 3 ай бұрын

@6969smurfy.. I fully agree with you…just want to add one thing..nowhere does our Father in Heaven ask as to reform or protest against Babylon, we are always told to leave and He will take us over the Jordan just like Abraham and the Israelites Got Torah Got Truth

@simonskinner1450 3 ай бұрын

Another error in Christianity is the vial teaching that everyone in the world has sinned, but 'all' means 'all that have sinned' as Romans 3:20 of those baptised must not sin.

@walkinginthegodgiven-jerem5502 2 ай бұрын

27:06 wow. One flock, one shepherd, WHO WILL LISTEN TO THE VOICE AND TEACHINGS OF JESUS WHILE ON EARTH, NOT IN THE SECRET SUPPOSEDLY GIVEN TO PAUL. Solberg said Jesus said sheep not of this fold I must bring and THEY will follow my voice and teachings. JESUS SENT the 12 to the whole earth. He didn’t send Paul as his sole apostle.

@Gigi2four 2 ай бұрын

Not understanding… are you anti Paul?

@rayray4192 3 ай бұрын

Proclaiming Shabbat is relevant in the new covenant is spitting in the face of Jesus.

@AndreColon 3 ай бұрын

You are speaking about the Holy day ?

@t.scottmajor1316 3 ай бұрын

Have you never read the terms of the New Covenant?

@pierreferguson1300 3 ай бұрын

Many unbelievers (Hebrews 3) do not care about Jesus giving them rest through believing the gospel (Hebrews 4) in the New Covenant (Hebrews 8). They only care about keeping Old Commandments in the Old Covenant of Judaism. Luke 5:39 "And no one, after drinking old wine wants new; for he says, ‘The old is fine.’” (NASB)

@t.scottmajor1316 3 ай бұрын

@@pierreferguson1300 Sorry, I'm not tracking with what you are saying. Jesus only taught from the Tanakh (Old Testament). There wasn't anything else to teach from. So, I don't know why you would say that unbelievers only care about keeping the commandments that Jesus was teaching. That doesn't make any sense.

@pierreferguson1300 3 ай бұрын

@@t.scottmajor1316 Where is Matthew 5:44 and John 13:34 in the Law given through Moses? It's not Matthew 5:43 and Matthew 22:39 which quote Leviticus 19:18 based on Hebrews 7:11. Have a good one in Old Testament Judaism, drinking old wine.

@ServentOfYahusha7 3 ай бұрын

I'm laughing 🤣 to bro. Just because Peter ate with gentiles doesn't mean he ate unclean. For example when I partake with my neighbors and family members they eat whatever but I eat biblically clean.

@salpezzino7803 3 ай бұрын

Galatians 2:14 But when I saw that their conduct was not in step with the truth of the gospel, I said to Cephas before them all, “If you, though a Jew, LIVE like a Gentile and not like a Jew, how can you force the Gentiles to live like Jews?” Acts 11: 2 So when Peter went up to Jerusalem, the circumcision party criticized him, saying, 3 “You went to uncircumcised men and ate with them.” Do you drink?

@ServentOfYahusha7 3 ай бұрын

@@salpezzino7803Where is the evidence that states that he specifically ate with them, and drank with the gentiles anything that was unclean.

@salpezzino7803 3 ай бұрын

@@ServentOfYahusha7 take your cult glasses off. Add the FACT that God told him all animals are now Food. Then reread Galatians 2. BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH

@Mikhael1964 3 ай бұрын

@@salpezzino7803Religiously clean Yes I agree.... But many of those foods GOD forbade the Israelites to eat in Leviticus are actually unhealthy for human consumption . Try eating some Bats,penguins,snakes,rats and see how you feel afterwards..lol 😂

@salpezzino7803 3 ай бұрын

@@Mikhael1964 that is a Lie, read Leviticus for yourself, Dont listen to Satan's lies. God says many times "it shall be unclean until the evening; then it shall be clean" I don't crap out my pulled pork till the next morning.

@johngillatt2740 3 ай бұрын

Peter's sheet was a vision. He neither killed nor ate. It was about people not food. Clean and unclean animals were already know when Noah entered the ark

@TheBiblicalRoots 3 ай бұрын

I have to respectfully disagree, John. Because if the Old Covenant dietary restrictions are still in effect under the New Covenant, then in this vision, Jesus commanded Peter to break the Mosaic law and sin! Even accounting for the symbolic nature of the vision, we have a command by Jesus to do something lawless. And if the food laws were still in effect, then the vision also includes Jesus telling a lie. Because His statement that God has made those animals clean would be untrue. RLS

@Wisdoms_Inheritance 2 ай бұрын

That is incorrect RLS, we see that God had cleansed the koinos in verse 15 not akathartos, so now we know that God was referring to the animals considered to be defiled, God didn't respond using akathartos because akathartos can't be restored to a state it never was, therefore Christ didn't command an unlawful thing nor tell a lie, Peters response is obviously based on him not understanding the vision at that moment, so it makes sense he would respond using both koinos and akathartos.

@walkinginthegodgiven-jerem5502 2 ай бұрын

16:41 Solberg. You are just like the Pharisees. Doing away with GODS commandments by doctrines and philosophical jargon of men. You need to study what Pharisees Korban is. It is apparent that RL Solberg pits Paul against And above Jesus words. Jesus says if you don’t believe I am He who Moses prophesied about and follow my words and build your house on my teachings, YOU WILL DIE IN YOUR SINS!

@sevenoftwelve8727 2 ай бұрын

Jesus never declared ALL FOODS CLEAN!! In Mark 7:19, Jesus uses this moment to make a more universal statement about eating that is not just about eating the specific piece of ritual bread. So he shifts focus from the word Artos (that they were eating) to the word Broma in Mark 7:19 . In fact, the last three words of Mark 7:19 - the often parenthetical phrase (Thus he declared all foods clean) are actually the following three Greek words: πᾶς καθαρίζω βρῶμα Strongs: G3956, G2511, G1033 The interpretation of these are: G3956: pas pas including all the forms of declension; apparently a primary word; all, any, every, the whole:-all (manner of, means), alway(-s), any (one), X daily, + ever, every (one, way), as many as, + no(-thing), X thoroughly, whatsoever, whole, whosoever. G2511: katharizo kath-ar-id’-zo from 2513; to cleanse (literally or figuratively):-(make) clean(-se), purge, purify. G1033: broma bro’-mah from the base of 977; food (literally or figuratively), especially (ceremonially) articles allowed or forbidden by the Jewish Torah:-meat, victuals. The first thought is, how does any honest Greek to English translator get the lengthy phrase “Thus he declared all foods clean” out of these three Greek words? But let’s ignore that for the moment and press on. However, bible translators who use this phrase cannot escape the force of the word “broma”! Even if one assumes this is a parenthetical statement by the writer instead of the end of Jesus' spoken sentence (which is debatable), the statement still only refers to the eating of Torah prescribed foods/meats with G1033 “broma”. There are two other Greek words for food/flesh/meat/eating that are not restricted to Torah foods and these are brosis (G1035) and trophe (G5160). G1035: brosis bro’-sis from the base of 977; (abstractly) eating (literally or figuratively); by extension (concretely) food (literally or figuratively):-eating, food, meat. G5160: trophe trof-ay’ from 5142; nourishment (literally or figuratively); by implication, rations (wages):-food, meat. The words “brosis” and “trophe” are used throughout the NT Greek in many places to mean many things, but the word “broma” is so exceedingly clear to any Greek scholar as meaning only Torah prescribed (Kosher, if you will) foods to a Greek Speaking Jew in first century Palestine that any debate to the contrary strains credibility. What was kosher or not kosher was very important to the Jews, and so, not surprisingly, Greek speaking Jews adopted a word that specifically addressed this much like the way we even have a word for this 2000 years later in English - that being “kosher”. An internet search of the word Broma may not necessarily return the “kosher” definitions, but that is because for Greek speakers who are not Jews, there is no need to adopt a Greek word for “kosher” because the concept does not even exist to them. However, Strong’s attempts to provide an interpretation that is most accurate with the way the word was used by Greek speaking Jews of the first century. And Strong was not a Messianic. He had no reason to attempt to prove Messianic teachings. He was just trying to be accurate with the words. To say the Greek word used as Strong’s G1033 in Mark 7:19 between first century Greek speaking Jews does not mean “kosher eating”(only), is intellectually dishonest. Knowing this, why didn’t Jesus (or Mark, if you will) use either brosis or trophe - a much more generic word for food that does not necessarily designate Torah (only) prescribe foods if they had wanted to extend their point to eating non-Torah foods? How extremely confusing of them to do that! Whatever point is being made about whatever is being eaten, we can be certain about one thing - that is, they are discussing the meaning of eating only Torah prescribed foods with “broma”. Even conceding the point that the Alexandrian Text points back to Jesus and thus justifies the statement as parenthetical, you would have to concede that a more honest rendering of this parenthetical statement due to the use of the word broma would have to be: “Thus He declared all Torah prescribed foods clean.” Eat all the “broma” you want and assign it whatever meaning you want to get out of Mark Chapter 7, but remember “broma” is ONLY Torah prescribed foods. And if there was any doubt about what Yeshua meant by what He said in Mark 7, thankfully we have the synoptic version of this same story told in Matthew 15:1-20, the conclusion of which is: Matthew 15:19-20 NAS “For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, slanders. These are the things which defile the man; but to eat with unwashed hands does not defile the man.” This addresses the man made rule of not washing hands without adding any direction to eat what is not described in the Torah. Also in Matthew 15, Jesus first calls the Pharisees hypocrites for transgressing the commandments of God and then in an instant turns around to the people and instructs them to transgress the commandments of God by ignoring part of the Torah? Who is the bigger hypocrite in this interpretation - Jesus or the Pharisees? People who say Jesus is teaching us not to follow God’s dietary commands are making Jesus out to be a bigger hypocrite than the Pharisees! How can this be? Is there no other plausible interpretation that prevents Jesus from being such a huge hypocrite? If such a plausible interpretation existed, wouldn’t that be the preferred one? The most eloquent solution is that Jesus was describing whether or not man-made rules added to the Torah make you unclean if you are eating Torah prescribed foods (i.e. Broma). In fact, if man makes this interpretation out to allow violations of God’s Torah, then aren’t we committing the EXACT same error Jesus berates the Pharisees for - that of transgressing the commandments of God for the sake of our traditions/interpretations? So, Jesus berates the Pharisees for transgressing the commandments of God, and our response to this is to preach transgressing the commandments of God? How can that be? Why would we choose an interpretation from Mark 7 that not only ignores the text there but also contradicts the interpretation in Matthew 15 and makes Jesus the biggest hypocrite of all? We see the best interpretation that matches both the text in Mark 7 and has the same meaning as Matthew 15 is that Jesus is saying you are not unclean if you follow eating Torah prescribed foods, but there is no extension in any of this that violates Torah and tells us to eat foods that are not prescribed by God.

@jacobsilverberg1329 2 ай бұрын

Nice article! I saw it word for word over on Reddit too. Assuming I reply to the author, when I pull up 1033 I get this: bróma: food Original Word: βρῶμα, ατος, τό Part of Speech: Noun, Neuter Transliteration: bróma Phonetic Spelling: (bro'-mah) Definition: food Usage: food of any kind. Food of any kind. Comparative uses; Matt.14:15 loaves and fishes, Luke 3:11, _"John answered, 'Anyone who has two shirts should share with the one who has none, and anyone who has food should do the same.”_ It would have been just as difficult to find Levitically unclean foods in Jerusalem as it would have been to find meats not sacrificed to idols in 1st century Rome. Israel was a closed society with all uniformly observing Levitical strictures. Thus kosher food was common food with no other point of reference within societal boundaries. As for the parenthetical, it's not known exactly whether the participle _katharizōn_ is to be treated adjectivally or adverbially, therefore we have variants in translation. But this does nothing to lessen the command of the Lord. Four verses prior, Mark 7:15: _" There is nothing (οὐδέν) that enters a man from outside which can defile him; but the things which come out of him, those are the things that defile a man."_ Oudeis - Strong's 3762 oudeis and outheis, oudemia, ouden and outhen: no one, none Original Word: οὐδείς, οὐδεμία, οὐδέν Part of Speech: Adjective Transliteration: oudeis and outheis, oudemia, ouden and outhen Phonetic Spelling: (oo-dice') Definition: no one, none Usage: no one, none, nothing. 3762 oudeís (from 3756 /ou "no, not" and 1520 /heís, "one") - properly, not one; no one, nothing. Nothing, not one, no one, without exception. This removes our discussion from the confines of any category. Nothing which enters the man defiles him, neither the soil of his ceremoniously unwashed hands, nor the ham sandwich they grasp. Because of course: _"... the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking,..I am convinced, being fully persuaded in the Lord Jesus, that nothing is unclean in itself...Do not destroy the work of God for the sake of food. All food is clean, .."_ Romans:14:14,17,20 Hopefully you have not yet progressed to the inevitable HRM apostasy of denying Paul and two thirds of the NT. "if man makes this interpretation out to allow violations of God’s Torah, then aren’t we committing the EXACT same error Jesus berates the Pharisees for..." It was God, not man who abolished the first covenant's legal status. It is now a dead work. Hebrews records the Holy Spirit's testimony to the Jew of the change in Law by the Law Giver. _"We must pay the most careful attention, therefore, to what we have heard, so that we do not drift away. For since the message spoken through angels was (ἐγένετο) binding, and every violation and disobedience received (ἔλαβεν) its just punishment, how shall we escape if we ignore so great a salvation? This salvation, which was first announced by the Lord, was confirmed to us by those who heard him. God also testified to it by signs, wonders and various miracles, and by gifts of the Holy Spirit distributed according to his will."_ Hebrews 2:1-4 _Egeneto,_ _"The preterites ἐγένετο and ἔλαβεν characterize the period of the Mosaic law as a past one, the condition of life prevailing in the same as one now obsolete and historically surmounted."_ Meyer's NT Commentary That spoken through angels "was" binding. An unqualified past tense aorist verb. But they are now dead works! _"how much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without spot to God, cleanse your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?"_ Hebrews 9:14

@karlcooke3197 3 ай бұрын

KZbin: Who changed the Sabbath and Why. ( The Real Story). Hope through Prophecy.

@michaeldunigan1067 3 ай бұрын

The Law was given to the Children of Israel through Moses. It belongs to the Jewish people. Following it outside of the congregation of Israel is a grievous act of cultural appropriation. If you want to keep Torah do it correctly. As a Jewish proselyte.

@king_____geo273 3 ай бұрын

Then why would you accept Jesus Christ he was given to the Jews and he is also a Jew from the tribe of juda

@michaeldunigan1067 3 ай бұрын

@@king_____geo273 Yeshua came to me personally. Apart from anything Jewish.

@t.scottmajor1316 3 ай бұрын

Isaiah 56:6-7 says the covenant is also for the foreigner.

@michaeldunigan1067 3 ай бұрын

@@t.scottmajor1316 The New Covenant is for everyone. But not the Law of Moses.

@t.scottmajor1316 3 ай бұрын

@@michaeldunigan1067 We must be reading about two different New Covenants. I am reading the one described in Jeremiah 31.

@MrH4YAH 3 ай бұрын

If we believe, we will have fruit(works). Through faith(requires works) we may be righteous. Breaking bread(food) diesn't mean he would eat filth(cannibal). If you are IN the "new" covenant ypu have no duty or business fishing for men unless your pride is your righteousness. This let's us all know who you are.

@michaelbrutsche75 3 ай бұрын

The disciples weren’t keeping Pentecost, they were the fulfillment of Pentecost. The feast of Pentecost was held fifty days from the offering of the first fruits and Jesus became the first fruits at His resurrection. The ones who were keeping the feast of Pentecost but were not a fulfillment of Pentecost were those that mocked and said, “These men are full of new wine” Acts 2:13.

@Truth-f2q 2 ай бұрын

Houston we have a problem...... Why would Jesus say pray your flight doesn't land on the Sabbath day if the Sabbath was going to be no more or Gentiles don't have to obey it??? I'm embarrassed for you. You're theology is twisted and false !

@TheBiblicalRoots 2 ай бұрын

Hi, Jeff. Matt 24:20 shows that Jesus anticipated that His Jewish followers would go right on keeping the seventh day Sabbath. And why would they ever stop? It was never banned or forbidden! RLS

@Mikhael1964 2 ай бұрын

@@TheBiblicalRootsDear Sir, you do know Jesus had gentile followers too,hence Acts 15 Jerusalem council meeting. It is known those gentile followers kept Sabbath too with there Jewish brothers in Christ on the seventh day. However there was some influential Church father's who were Jew haters ,due to them killing Jesus. And they despised the idea sharing Sabbath rest with them . One was Ignatius. In 107AD, he wrote; " Let us therefore no longer keep the Sabbath after the Jewish manner,and rejoice in the days of idleness; for he that does not work,let him not eat...let every friend of Christ keep the Lords day as a festival ,the resurrection day, the queen and the chief of all days (of the week)". The Church actually believed and followed a lie, that was first contoured up during second century ,made the law by Jew hating Constantine in 3rd Man asserted that GOD or the apostles changed the day of worship from Sabbath on the seventh day of week ,to Sunday the first day of week. Observance of Sunday as the primary day of worship solified in Emperor Hadrian's days (117-135AD). He harshly persecuted Jews ,and prohibited practices of Judaism, incl seventh day Sabbath. These oppressive measures influenced many Christians in Rome to abandon seventh day Sabbath and turn to Sunday.. That day itself was historically observed by Romans as a day of veneration of the sun. Within a few centuries Sabbath observance by Christians was virtually eliminated within confines of the empire and replaced by Sunday worship. And has been so ever since worldwide. I have more knowledge on this. I was hoping you would show it on your book ref Church fathers , but you didn't.. Gentile Christians have kept Sabbath day commandment as a Holy,rest day, worshipping,praising GOD, for 2000 years+ for he created the world in six days and rested on the seventh ,see Genesis 2:1-3.. There was no Jew,gentile back then.. Obviously without the mosaic rules,oral traditions etc.. We don't have to do it their way, as we not Jews,. As, explained in Acts 15 ...GOD BLESS 🙏

@tbishop4961 3 ай бұрын

18:55 weak logic

@gracemusonda9396 3 ай бұрын

It’s a good idea but There are so many churches in Zambia and l think govt can not afford. It will be a huge responsibility Pastors should not only sit and wait for umutulo awe- the bible says we should work. They should help themselves Otherwise if they compromise with their faith it’s upto them. There’s nothing wrong to get the money from ba pompwe after all nabo teshabo cilifye. Ni don’t kubeba it comes to voting

@keithhunt3498 3 ай бұрын

Can anyone who identify as Christians share one bible verse that says salvation is of Christians, Christians are aaved or Christians will be in the kingdom of heaven? * For example share a verse like Romans 11:26-27. *Like, Luke 22:28-30, Luke 1:68, Matthew 15:24, John 4:22-24 * Like Isaiah 45:17-19, Isaiah 49:6-7, Jeremiah 3:23. * Like Acts 5:29-32, Acts 13:42-47. * Like Revelation 21:12. * Share a bible verse like the examples we just shared that says Christian instead Israel. * There are no bible verses that says salvation is of Christianity, because the bible doesn't have Christian roots. * Christ clearly tells you that His Father is the Elohim of Abraham,Isaac and Jacob in Matthew 22:32, but you completely ignore( Matthew 7:21-28) what Christ says in the bible * The apostles obeyed the Elohim of Abraham,Isaac and Jacob in Acts 5:29-32. * Paul obeyed the Elohim of the fathers, and walked with Christ in Acts 24:14 and His teachings in Matthew 5:17-20. * Read what Paul says in 2 Corinthians 4:1-6. Shalom

@TheBiblicalRoots 3 ай бұрын

Hi, Keith! A Christian is someone who believes in Christ. So here's the verse you requested: "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life" (John 3:16). I know within the world of Torahism it's become fashionable to lash out against the title of "Christian," but don't forget that the Bible says "If anyone suffers as a Christian, let him not be ashamed, but let him glorify God in that name" (1 Pet. 4:16). RLS

@keithhunt3498 3 ай бұрын

@@TheBiblicalRoots I know the term Christian is in the bible 3 times. * We should be able to agree that the term Christian wasn't used in the 1st century when the bible was written. * You haven't shared a verse that actually has the word Christian in it leading to salvation. * Christ says John 3:16, the precept for John 3:16 is Isaiah 45:17. * Christ is not referring to this worldly system we all live in , clearly saying His kingdom is not of this world in John 18:36. * He referring to the world without end in Isaiah 45:17-19 that Elohim will create after Christ returns. * After John 3:16, Christ goes on to say John 4:22-24. * The Christian problem with the bible is neither Elohim or Christ says the term Christian anywhere in the book. * All of the prophecy about gathering the elect never mentions Christians but always says Israel which would include grafted gentiles. * Read Isaiah 49:6-7, which is a precept for what Paul says in Acts 13:42-47, Romans 11:13-27 and Ephesians 2:11-14. * Christian simply means follower of Christ, well Christ is not a Christian, according to scripture He is a Hebrew Israelite of the tribe of Judah. ( John 4:22) * Christ clearly says who He came for in Matthew 15:24, and we know without a doubt that His apostles understood this according to Acts 5:29-32. * And We know His apostles and disciples were Israelites according to 2 Corinthians 11:22, and Paul of course was sent to preach to the gentiles according to Acts 9:15. This is not complicated, it's a simple matter of reading and believing what the bible actually says and mean. Shalom

@TheBiblicalRoots 3 ай бұрын

@@keithhunt3498 Hi, Keith. Your first two sentences contradict each other: "The term Christian is in the bible" but "the term Christian wasn't used in the 1st century when the bible was written." Of course it was used in the 1st century. We know that because it is found in the first-century text of the Bible. In fact, Peter encouraged his first-century readers who were suffering as Christians (1 Pet. 4:12-19) RLS

@keithhunt3498 3 ай бұрын

@@TheBiblicalRoots The English language didn't exist in the first century, therefore it clearly wasn't used. * Besides that, the point is you can't share a bible verse that says salvation is of Christianity, because there is absolutely no salvation in Christianity, if there was the bible would say as much. Christ tells us who He came for in Matthew 15:24. He tells us who salvation is of in John 4:22. And He tells us who be in His kingdom in Luke 22:28-30. * You don't find it strange that Christ never says the term Christian, anywhere in the bible? * You don't think it's strange that Elohim never says the term Christian in the bible? * The term Christian is only in the bible 3 times. * The term Israel is in the bible more than 2500 times, from Genesis to Revelation. * Many of those entries says salvation is of Israel, Isaiah 45:17, Isaiah 49:6, Jeremiah 3:23, Ezekiel 37:25-28, Luke 1:68, Luke 2:32, Acts 5:29-32, Romans 11:26, Revelation 21:12. * The bible is simply not a Christian book, regardless of what language it is translated into. Shalom