10 Upcoming Aircraft Carriers Of The World (2023)

[@sendohakira3889]

There is no doubt that US aircraft carriers are and will remain the most powerful in the world. China, with its strong shipbuilding and economy, will have aircraft carriers second only to the US

[@erikb8979]

The u s has had almost a century of aircraft carrier experience. Building a ship is one thing. But perfecting everything on one is a different story. The amount of aircraft on American carriers alone would b another thing China will have figure out. They will eventually. But as far as experience they could never catch up. Unless of course the liberal leftist democrats just drastically slash American military in half. Or by 2/3. Which is one of there goal. Imagine the corruption that 600 billion dollars could by under a liberal controlled United states

[@erikb8979]

Could buy. 600 billion a year. Wow. U think politicians r living good now. Just wait

[@40klegion78]

@@erikb8979 true I just wonder how much they’ll have to cut away at the constitution to remaine in power after they decide to start retiring our most iconic weapon

[@jeffs4483]

Df-21D Chinese anti carrier missiles would easily take them out. Carriers are obsolete.

[@zosimoromero3475]

@@jeffs4483 china build us aircraft carrier dummy in the middle of chinas dessert and used for targeting practiced.. that was a clear message for the us navy to pull out its aircraft carrier in south chuna sea.. us navy carrier dont have the capabilities to depend itself from in coming hypersinuc missile like the DF 21 ✌✌✌

[@DanielByrns]

I am glad the Enterprise name will live on

[@steph8227]

The future french PAN will be 300 meters long not 250 as show on the video

[@zhoubaidinh403]

I gots your 50 feet right here, right here......

[@barrymiller3385]

We don't actually know yet! No completed design has been proposed - let alone accepted and ordered.

[@Beyllion]

​@@barrymiller3385 The specs are pretty much known now. It will be 310 meters long (305m long deck, the stern is extended by 5 meters). Will displace between 75Kt to 80Kt. The official order is expected to happen in 2025.

[@eligebrown8998]

Sweet they're building a new Enterprise!!

[@francoism2232]

USA have so much carriers that they need to recycle boat names :)

[@eligebrown8998]

At least our carriers don't need to be towed to war by tug boats like Russia.

[@janus3555]

@@francoism2232 Reason they used Enterprise. That way we can use NCC-1701 A, then B, then C, then bloody D. (Scotty reference from that one TNG episode) I'm sure we can update cannon to the Star Trek Enterprise toinclude this carrier.

[@ultralaggerREV1]

Imagine how happy Doris Miller would be knowing his life was super valuable by thanking him with a carrier

[@adasgrg]

Thats true.

[@scottcampbell2585]

It’s sad it has taken 70 years to honor this man. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 putting your ass on the line for liberty should stop being a punch line for the so called elected criminals in Washington DC.

[@tylerscott3190]

@@scottcampbell2585 this is the 2nd ship named after Dorie Miller. The first one was a destroyer escort. I'd like to see aircraft carriers be named after battles again myself

[@RahimmacDonald]

🥳🎊🎉🥳🍻👏🏼🎈Imagine how happy black personnel that will serve on the USS Doris Miller CVN-81 will be. Will definitely calm black peoples nerves lol. I’m black so of course I’m happy bout it.

[@GreatWhiteShark75]

I served in the Navy and I am so glad that he will get his due recognition. A hero and a legend.

[@puirYorick]

2:27 I enjoyed the chateau island for the French carrier concept. I hope the (Dorie) Doris Miller gets built on schedule or sooner.

[@amitmodanwal7438]

I from India 🇮🇳 I love brother 👍

[@Mako2-1]

I fuk w that bro…

[@ash_1419]

Wth😂

[@vasavaalpesh6182]

What the f***🤣🤣😅😅

[@rage8673]

I don't know if your English is weak, but the speaker is a woman.😂

[@parishrutsingh8956]

What is happening here?

[@chrispinard9559]

300 meters for the futur French aircraft carriers...

[@theonethatidontknow101]

0:09: ? 0:15: uss gerald r ford 0:22/5:22: rf shtorm/project 23000/ e shtorm 0:30: admiral kuznetsov 0:43: cn type 003 1:22: rokn cvx 2:09: ? pang 2:16: charles de guille 2:41 ins vishal 2:56/3:05: ? 3:25: uss john f kennedy 4:10: cn type 004 5:42: uss dorris miller 6:31: ins vikrant 6:44: this is not literally vikrant

[@GaffurGhisela]

6:44 this is literally Vikrant.

[@frightfulbuffalo7081]

That's vikrant mate.

[@theonethatidontknow101]

@@frightfulbuffalo7081 doesnt look like vikrant

[@frightfulbuffalo7081]

@@theonethatidontknow101 it is but it's not completed yet, it's construction will be completed at the start of 2022. I think that's why you thought that it is not vikrant.

[@theonethatidontknow101]

@@frightfulbuffalo7081 nope

[@essexu]

Cant wait for the Big E return!

[@senker1544]

Finally a new Enterprise 🤩 Make it so.

[@dawsonkozel4171]

My old math teacher used to work on the usa enterprise so I hope he’ll be happy with them making a new aircraft carrier and naming it that

[@jacinda2710]

Live Long and Prosper

[@Oxley016]

@@jacinda2710 Peace and long life

[@Charbob-j9w]

It's so cool that they're naming a carrier after Dorris Miller!

[@brajpanwar9032]

India ❤️

[@arberg5760]

Did anyone else notice that the platform depictions of the carriers do not match the models or the photos of the real build. For example the Chinese type 03 carrier is mirror imaged, and the Korean carrier has an angled landing deck while the model has a straight deck.

[@usermolarity]

Korean carrier will do not have an angled landing deck as Korean navy already determined to construct only straight deck model for CVX project in last year. It will be only available for VTOL planes such as F-35B and various choppers.

[@rizon72]

Its not the best channel for accuracy.

[@yohwl]

"Let's make sure history never forgets the name... Enterprise"

[@Sean-C]

United Federation of Planets NCC 1701 USS Enterprise Captain James T. Kirk

[@Oxley016]

@@Sean-C This quote is of Jean Luc Picard, Captain USS Enterprise NCC-1701D.

[@roryhennessey1983]

Oh man you got to the comment section before me​@@Sean-C

[@gugeg7579]

only Chinese and American carriers in this list are actually building or will be built… others are still models or PowerPoint slides 🙂

[@byw8396]

ppt lol, u got me there

[@giflk487]

The indian one is too

[@pandiansundara1275]

India's INS Vikrant already completed its trial journey. So dont under estimate India

[@kaiwei9901]

@@pandiansundara1275 LOL.

[@pandiansundara1275]

@@kaiwei9901 rolf

[@mikelbrenn111]

Size is one thing but quality and experience is another.

[@brunodn9702]

The French PANG is 305 meters overall. You showed the design of the 25 years old Charles de Gaulle which is 261 m overall.

[@ScarScream]

Was about to post that ;)

[@M0PO3]

The pic of Type 003 is mirrored.

[@rinchin1431]

Among all of Indian Aircraft carrier is smallest......so hope we will also build like them named INS VISHAL II

[@estoyaqui5386]

Even a "small" carrier is a huge asset. You will gather knowledge and experience in handling these complex machines, the necessary infrastructure, etc. India is making good progress!

[@अण्वायुवरीवर्त]

Well Just now we got INS Vishakhapattanam

[@Yourfather786]

After all bro we are going to build a 65000 to 75000 ton

[@jetli740]

@@Yourfather786 no unless you want to be laugh at least... 120,000 ton

[@Yourfather786]

@@jetli740 bro till 2035 we will be able to get the amount of money invested in a 1,20,000 ton aircraft carrier so I think first we should make the best dominance in the Indian Ocean then we will expand it slowly by pushing the boundaries further

[@salihaasiri6336]

Shtorm must be a legend

[@classicgalactica5879]

It's not going to happen. Russia doesn't have the money, the facilities or the know how to build a supercarrier.

[@Sergey-uj6mr]

@@classicgalactica5879 These are minor problems. The problem is that we cannot decide whether it is necessary to build aircraft carriers.

[@johnshields6852]

The teaching and training of these sailor's and pilots flying the latest fighters and technology built in is what makes them special, the USA navy has a great heritage of having the best and latest tech available. 🙏🇺🇲

[@liquidmantel8164]

Thats what most dont understand when they mention an at sea confrontation between chinese hypersonic missiles and a american carrier fleet. 2 world war sea experience between the 2.

[@abelincoln6785]

Nothing about what you say is non replicatable. Nothing. Pour enough money into something and you get those fighters and technology. Germany had V2 missiles, tiger tanks, etc but lost - its all about the numbers and everything about what we create is duplicated.

[@Intrusive_Thought176]

​@ABE LINCOLN then china keeps launching type 55 destroyers which are targets for our submarines 😂

[@jhill4874]

Interesting the number of carriers that are going to take a decade to build.

[@onyebuchiihejieto1142]

You and i know say na lie e be 😊. China claiming what they no fit do.

[@naman6491]

As Indian, I want 3 more aircraft carriers then now and displacement weight of 85,000 Tons. And many of our islands can be turned to unsinkable Aircraft Carriers.

[@OmKaR-if2ek]

Well, do you even pay tax ?

[@bibinthomas5282]

@@OmKaR-if2ek only 3% of us are eligible to pay income tax,all of them pays....it automatically deducts from their banks,but all of us pay indirect taxes....goods,petrol, imports tax,vechicle tax, gst's....list goes on

[@randomreviews5693]

@@OmKaR-if2ek well I do...n India should invest more on Navy....in 15 years there will be 4 superpowers USA China India and Russia, followed by UK France Germany ....It becomes all the way more important to have a huge navy....Invest now to reap benefits on time

[@40klegion78]

@Parth Boi ok does he mean islands for real ? India’s a good Allie against China and being an American I’d hate to see y’all waist so much money. Here’s the deal dont tell China but static fortifications aren’t effective anymore like chinas going to learn if things don’t change thrifty Cruze missles will wipe out islands like sitting ducks and even if the do have anti middle capability’s it’s only a matter of time

[@debanjandas456]

@Parth Boi Andaman nicobar Island can be used as airbase and are unsinkable but they can't move and unsinkable doesn't mean they can't be destroyed they become easy targets for ballistic missile and cruise missile

[@Snag97]

I doubt I'll live to see the day when carriers become obsolete. 😂

[@walterengler5709]

Have to wonder if the Russian one has any hope of being completed now.

[@legiran9564]

They can b-a-r-e-l-y keep the one they have in working order. Russia happens to be so dependent on foreign import to keep its war machine running they completely stopped thank production because of lack of imported parts like for example ROLLER BEARINGS. I'm astounded that Russia has to IMPORT something as mundane as roller bearings to produce thanks. W-T-F was Putin thinking when he invaded Ukraine? 🤣

[@junahn1907]

It never did.

[@jjjjc5999]

India's aircraft carrier has been built for 10 years, and I think it will take another decade.

[@NightPhoenix.Y]

Their Ganges river is estimated to dry up by 2050 from it's glacier melt away and their trying to build an aircraft carrier? And not only that they have a space program? Bruh they need to set their priorities straight. Edit: this comment section is already long enough, so plz no more comments.

[@thpedits]

@@NightPhoenix.Y different department but ok

[@heranshen9791]

really? I remembered that when its design started, Athens was helding the Olympic, now the Tokyo Olympic was over...

[@pranavdinesh5167]

@@NightPhoenix.Y ohh...u really thought we were gonna drive this on a river? Like bruh u need to get educated lol instead of teaching us about our priorities lol....also, yeah our space program is one of the most successful one in the world, I can see ur something burning lol

[@NightPhoenix.Y]

@@pranavdinesh5167

[@ishy4gees]

Wonderful

[@silverpleb2128]

Why is the PANG and the CVX in your video are sharing the same size when the PANG is planned to be 305m long and nearly 2x times larger than the CVX when the CVX is planned to be 260m long and 46m large. The video isnt even showing the real project of the PANG... PLUS, the PANG will be supposed to carry Rafales and SCAF.

[@abelincoln6785]

Retired US Navy officer here. Carriers are the battleships of ww2. Sorry but they are much easier to destroy and knock out that we think. Modern missile technology and stand off weapons as well as underwater threats, drone swarms and overwhelming air attack taken together will make them obsolete. Suffer a catapult or power casualty during an engagement and its all over. We almost lost two carrier off Vietnam due to our own unforced errors - not attacks. There is a damn good reason we never sail a carrier into the Persian Gulf. Think it is hard to put down a carrier? - I give you the USS Bonham Richard. Destroyed because of a single fire dockside. We thought the Titanic was unsinkable too. Carriers cannot deal with an overwhelming threat coming from land.

[@zplee1357]

So,why French 300 meters heavy carrers image is so small in this video 😂

[@tritium1998]

It's an Indian channel so it will say India's magical Vishal will carry more planes (maybe their magical HAL AMCA) than bigger carriers.

[@improbablynotahooman5782]

@@tritium1998 but the data is correct and match with Wikipedia's data

[@chongzhouliu7893]

In the video, the Chinese aircraft carrier appears to have a displacement equivalent to half its size

[@deepindersingh2001]

Update :- INS VIKRANT is ready and commissioned for INDIAN NAVY. ❤️🇮🇳

[@prajith.p5350]

Commissioned

[@HenriHattar]

Pity there wasnt the same amount of investment to acquire toilets in ever school.

[@PrithwirajSardar420]

Agree but what about submarine? We need this too

[@msvishwas5606]

​@@HenriHattar cry 😂

[@davidbridge5652]

The french carrier looks pretty small for such a large displacement

[@silverpleb2128]

The video is actualy not showing the real size, in the video the PANG is sharing the same size than the CVX while in reality it is supposed to be way larger and longer

[@stanielsoncoochiesmellehsm6114]

They have tons of white flags onboard

[@silverpleb2128]

@@stanielsoncoochiesmellehsm6114 True, The french navy is carrying a lot of white flag because we know that the royal navy is missing a lot of things, from the planes for its carriers, to the white flag since the sink of the HMS sheffield. Better surrendering than loosing to some spaniard guys :/ We're true allies !

[@stanielsoncoochiesmellehsm6114]

@@silverpleb2128 Lmao did i hit a nerve you french quitter the Americans needs to deliver OUR F35Bs that we have already paid for this is the least they can do for now its not our fault thw deliveries are taking long DO YOUR RESEARCH the UK Has the 2ND LARGEST F35 fleet in the world behined the US you are just Mad the UK is the most powerful country Europe according to the stats 🤷‍♂️

[@stanielsoncoochiesmellehsm6114]

@@silverpleb2128 which HMS Sheffield the one that crushed the nazis throug the whole of ww2 or the one where we won in the falklands?

[@tahsanahmed1710]

Nice video

[@jammiedodger7040]

This list should not include carriers of the same class that have already been built

[@samz8864]

Modern Warships player over here👌

[@OrdinaryDude]

I still believe the new USS Enterprise should be the CVN-65-A. (If you get it, you get it.)

[@bricefleckenstein9666]

Why? The first Enterprise carrier was CV-6, they didn't keep the number for the second one. Why keep the second number for the 3'd carrier by the same name?

[@OrdinaryDude]

@@bricefleckenstein9666 It was just a joke. 🙄

[@Sean-C]

The real question should be who is in command of the USS Enterprise NCC 1701, Kirk or Picard!

[@Nastyswimmer]

The CVX will be "unique as it will accommodate the F35B vertical take off fighter" - just like the Royal Navy's two aircraft carriers already do.

[@spitfire8790]

It'll be smaller, but Honestly, I kind of wish the RN would go with this approach instead. 4 CVX instead of 2 QE.

[@carlchan1113]

是的，像F35一样能潜水

[@Sab93746]

@@carlchan1113 better than fake stealth fighter jet (J-20)

[@steverobertson1729]

Also, aircraft carriers have been accomodating VTOLS for DECADES, its nothing "unique" or new🤷

[@aboutraore6754]

It's a floating coffin for north Korea missiles

[@mango_guru]

I don't think India built ins vishal this early because government thinking about 6-8 nuclear power submarine to built by the name called project 75 alpha so I think there is a further delay in aircraft carrier

[@billygraham2132]

Subs > carriers for defense. Carriers are offensive weapons.

[@fortune3911]

INXIA

[@rohitb5834]

Project 75A is a priority yes. But we can expect INS Vishal and all 6 of those SSNs by late 2030s. Probably 3-4 S5 Class SSBNs too.

[@superpooper_2030]

Actually all projects in India 110% will be delayed and cost overrun. It's our Hindu culture

[@abcdefgh-hz6pk]

​@@superpooper_2030 literally all the aircraft carrier or big defiance programs have those

[@julienmerlat5141]

As for the PANG (french aircraft carrier) the estimed siez is more over 300 meters, the graphic here shows less than 250 meters...

[@Thunderworks]

It's a anti-french channel, nothing new

[@garrickparsons9077]

I thought so, glad I wan't the only one to notice. 75K tons of displacement and is shorter than a 45K VTOL carrier? That makes no sense.

[@francoism2232]

Let the world underestimate french army. That's better for France to have the challenger status than the leader one.

[@jinpark1092]

the world builds 12 new carriers The U.S builds 13 for its navy.. WW2 US sent 11 aircraft carriers to kill battleship yamato and musashi

[@cosplayshop]

20 actually, America class is also an aircraft carrier, the USN is building another 8 of those, if you also count the new Flight III San Antonio class (which rumor has it The USN have tested and operate F-35B on a San Antonio LPD with reinforced flight deck, but regardless, they were designed to carry helicopter anyway), then the number is 31 aircraft carrier.

[@mattep74]

Nahh, they did not send them. The sat atound okinawa waiting. The commander of the US battleships basically said: i rather shhot at land targets, let the carriers play some "

[@labracadabradorr]

A lot of people that play a mobile game called modern warships will recognize most of those carrier...but i didn't know that the Shtorm project will really come in russa's Navy ;) i'm surprised xD

[@c7zr179]

That game is a hot, steaming pile of garbage.

[@ayushsingh-ck7jo]

Make a video on Anti Satellite Missile 🙌🏻

[@FactkingAnkush....]

ASAT 😃

[@yin8838]

There is no anti satellite missiles from any country except China.

[@rage8673]

@@yin8838 😑

[@vaibhavjain2314]

@@yin8838 america, india, russia, china these all countries have anti satellite missile...so don't comment without any knowledge ok

[@mohammedazarudeen7944]

@@vaibhavjain2314 UK,FRANCE many countries can develop that but space debris is the issues ,need to cone up With different strategies to kill Satellite

[@joedpanopio5987]

the manning, we'll trained personnel, new technologies, application of new technologies and the auxiliaries back up battle group are the key elements winning the battle.... remember WW2 where huge battleships and carrieres were built by the axis but all succumbed to the sea bed....it ain't the size but the application of a well battle plan and those above-mentioned will help....

[@jibrilherrcherofhorny4448]

uh germany build battlecruiser its japan that build monstrous air carrier and battleship remenber yamato ?

[@kooperativekrohn819]

Not a great example but i see where your coming from , Germany could have used its navy a-lot more efficiently in the war but the allies always found a way to hinder or scare them from deploying anything after the loss of such ships like the Bismarck as such the U-boats where found to be alot more effective but well put point ! Escort ships and aircraft are needed to make them effective even in todays world support is needed , logistics and coms are key . Electronic warfares a big thing now too!

[@PrashantKumar-gj7qg]

Love you sister from India🇮🇳

[@TB.D]

Pang = 305 m, 75k tons, 2 k22 for 220 mw each. Price (estimate) 4.5 billion euros. Or 5.1 billion dollars

[@Sonia_Godfray_Hindu]

Need ins Virat within 7 years . Good to hear from you my Meghalayn sister 😘

[@OmKaR-if2ek]

Hyy NRI. Lol

[@meritoriousgamer]

Hello Sonia ji, nice to meet you again. आपसे फिर मिलकर अच्छा लगा। नमस्कार 🙏

[@QuantumNinja1.9]

INS VIRAT?

[@vtbmwbiker]

Pretty sure the island on the 003 is on the starboard and not the port side. At least that's what the publicly available images show.

[@tritium1998]

It's clearly a falsified image of a nonexistent carrier because they are just that dumb and scammy. I mean just look at the direction of the jet blast deflectors.

[@devast4977]

I love to read how upset people here are seeing our Indian aircraft carrier.😂jai hind🇮🇳✌

[@barambaniprometheus]

it's just jealous pakistanis, PAKIIIISTAN GRAPE🍇

[@johnc2438]

I'm not upset. Best wishes for your navy -- retired U.S. Navy chief petty officer.

[@ishikinokami1575]

Chill man. Most salty comments are from Pakistanis.

[@jetli740]

no one here upset on your baby aircraft carrier, cattle carrier is bigger

[@ashurathi9286]

@@jetli740 did you got hurt bro😂

[@kooperativekrohn819]

They’re all just big targets with out escort ships , logistical support ships and most importantly effective aircraft and pilots ! Much love from the uk. 🇬🇧🦁

[@SUNNYSTARSCOUT365]

Mong chị làm về danh sách các loại súng tiểu liên sắp tới trong tương lai :))

[@meritoriousgamer]

भारत माता की जय, भारत होगा विश्व की महाशक्ति

[@TomTomicMic]

Well in its own backyard, if they can stand up to China!?!

[@youerny]

Apparently nobody is willing to miss the opportunity to participate to this arm race. Too much conventional armaments are prone to spark regional and global confrontations. Bad news

[@TheOne30264]

If you have a growing economy, you better have the military to protect your asset.

[@djwilliams3058]

The American economy is built on war.

[@blobgooll9395]

@@djwilliams3058 U mad?

[@djwilliams3058]

@@blobgooll9395 I’m good, you straight?

[@indiano.1.]

India no.1 jai hind

[@xingkele3322]

Ok, No body can defeat, "Allah hu Akbar, Ka boom 💥"

[@hamzahh18]

The Fact is: Cn type 003-004 (CHINA), CVX (KOREA), RF STORM (RUSSIA), and USS ENTERPRISE (USA) has been released at games (MODERN WARSHIP) and I've been bought RF Shtorm and USS enterprise hahaha

[@MiguelCMB]

CN Type 003 FuJian 🇨🇳 (2022) CN Type 004 Beijing 🇨🇳 (2025 - 2030) CN Type 005 Zheng He 🇨🇳 (2030-2033) RF Shtorm 🇷🇺 (2030) ROKS CVX 🇰🇷 (2025) USS Enterprise (CVN-80) 🇺🇲 (2030) (All the future carriers whit its name and year)

[@Sushant_Raj_]

I buy everything of game leaving legendary items an ac ships

[@tonycoleman2184]

It's awesome their naming one Dorris Miller

[@Paapi_purush]

Where's Pakistan my beloved country 🇵🇰🇵🇰

[@meritoriousgamer]

😂😂busy in begging some dollars from China

[@chandank3506]

No they are chanting kashmir, kashmir 😂😂

[@olivertseng8466]

China will give liaoning and shandong to Pakistan, don't worry

[@meritoriousgamer]

@@olivertseng8466 yes sure , but China can't because China is not member of MTCR so its can't give any missile to any country which has range more than 300km

[@meritoriousgamer]

@@olivertseng8466 also when India gives some malietry equipments to Japan Vietnam, Philippines then China starts shouting. This is wrong. Don't disturb us , we will never disturb you Because we say वसुधैव कुटुंबकम् Vashudhava Kutumbakam means whole world is a family . Because we say अतिथि देवो भव atithi devo bhav means respect & welcome guests like god.

[@Jopsyduck]

saving the best for last i see

[@chinahamyku6583]

The construction of China's aircraft carrier is still in its infancy. The main task of China's aircraft carrier in the foreseeable future is to ensure the safety of China's surrounding areas (including China's East China Sea, Taiwan Strait and South China Sea). However, when U.S. aircraft carriers and Chinese aircraft carriers are fighting around China, they must always be aware of the fact that China's DF-21D and DF-26B missiles will cooperate with Chinese aircraft carriers. In other words, 2500KM westward, including Guam, is covered by Chinese missiles.

[@mediador9161]

Now what? 😂

[@janus3555]

USAF 2W2 then 2W1 here. We can squib and jam IFA the DF series BMs. They aren't a threat to the carriers. This is why we'll continue to operate in the Indo-pacific (which includes SChina Sea), Pacific and Indian ocean. We also have 8 of our 14 Ohio-class subs within the Indo-pacific, Taiwan Straight, Sea of Japan and SChina Sea. A full compliment would eliminate about 440-700 million people from those 8. This is due to China's population being extremely dense and congested into a small area. And no, as a nuke troop, we would not bat an eye at that loss. Zero hesitation. China doesn't benefit like the US does with population sprawl. They're also terrified of a reprisal. This is why they will never act and will never strike.

[@VioletSilence]

So our Admiralty finally came to their senses and decided to build a supercarrier 🤔Interesting indeed.

[@tonyni7139]

No one: Congress: what should we name the carrier US military: E N T E R P R I S E

[@foxythefox356]

They'll always passed down the name to another ship once the original ship is decommission

[@jennifercarruth2811]

If the Indian carriers arebmade,they are Def gonna smash

[@eldraino9933]

I feel the age of supremacy of the mega carrier is drawing to an end - with new hypersonic missiles, autonomous swarm weapons and particularly dangerous undersea robotic weapons, these 100,000 ton giants are huge targets and will be very difficult to defend. They need to develop small subs that can surface and launch 1-2 autonomous attack drones, then submerge. Survivability and redundancy will be the key winning the battle space in the second part of this century.

[@zadarthule]

It's like at the end of the battleship era. The new systems are not yet up to the task to carry the job. Staying power and force projection is always harder than a single engagement.

[@billygraham2132]

Carriers are for projecting power internationally, they are tools of diplomacy and intimidation more than for peer-to-peer war. Any fool who thinks the US will rush carriers into harm's way is just that - a fool. We will neutralize enemy defenses with, oh say about 154 cruise missiles from former USS Ohio-class boomers, B2s, etc. Then carriers will support the ground campaign. The US will NOT risk a carrier to defend Taiwaan, for example, the US public will not tolerate that.

[@UgandanAirForce]

i can imagine the future being populated by ships being used a platforms for detection equipment, stealth, drones, and long range missile batteries

[@wes9451]

You're likely right, I like the US approch of task based mini carriers. They seem more functional and adaptable to certian tasks. It also doesn't hurt to put your eggs in more baskets. I don't see the US stopping the dick messuring contest though. There are functional reasons to keep them around, however they will remain more of a flagship craft.

[@charaznable2859]

This may be fictional but to fix this problem they should consider the design of that submarine carrier in the show ' macross 0'. This is where jets are vertically launched to the surface of the water.

[@BenyoSid]

Great

[@Tousif8.9]

Love Russia and China From Bangladesh.🇧🇩❤🇷🇺❤️🇧🇩❤️🇨🇳

[@im.rimon_]

I have heard that Bangladesh navy use fisher boat 🤣🤣

[@rahulrajeev2537]

@@im.rimon_ , Bangladesh has navy...🤔

[@silverfish2380]

Bangladesh is on China's side damn India has to liberate Bangladesh again 😂

[@silverfish2380]

@@rahulrajeev2537 Ya they have India and China both have provided some ships to them but they got over shadowed by Indian Navy i don't think any country's Navy come close to India's Navy in Indian Ocean India is dominating the Indian Ocean for now atleast let see what happens in future

[@Tousif8.9]

@@im.rimon_ Bangladesh Navy is strong

[@Torente32]

Everytime i hear someone talk about how Streamlined, and automated systems will be on the Ford-Class Super Carriers for lower crew requirements, I hear more space for combat troops and other military assets to be used for carrier or other military operations.

[@justsomerandomguywithoutab5896]

The fact that the US is building more aircraft carriers instead of just refitting/overhauling existing ones by gutting it is concerning. The Nimitz class looks like it's good enough to still be in use for another 30-40 years, and that could be possible by gutting the interior and replacing the propulsion with a smaller, more efficient version of the A1B could be a better investment, as far as improved nuclear power for non-military use is concerned, like powerplants for generating power to replace coal reactors. If they need to increase the cooling system with larger pipes/electrical wiring, they could just drill holes and reduce crew requirements, while turning those rooms into pipeline areas. It would improve efficiency, like how the Ford-class was supposed to have 4,000 crew instead of 5,000. Maybe expanding the island and ripping out the steam catapult + system and replacing with EMALS after they actually manage to fix the system could work as well, at least since the Nimitz has working elevators so there's no need to fix those (just drilling more holes and copying/pasting exact copies of Nimitz carrier elevators could also actually work, instead of trying to redesign one and end up with a huge mess. Literally, if they can get creative, they can just add every feature that the Ford is supposed to have for half the price, and the rest of the money could actually be spent on supporting homeless Veterans or Veterans who need support. Also, cost overruns are the main reason that the ships are 2-3 times more expensive than projected, and stopping that by forcing these companies to work with the money given for once could make them do something, even if they have to get their materials from other countries that have cheaper costs.

[@eduanstander7613]

I see youre approach but look at it this way if the USA refitted Nimitz aircraft carriers and a war broke out they don't have carriers which is the majority of their might. The Nimitz classes are also smaller than the fords and the fords are designed around their systems like the new electromagnetic catapult. It is all just about one upping previous iterations and improving on the last

[@cosplayshop]

Actually, refitting and overhauling existing ship cost more money than building a new one, just like getting a car, would you buy a new car rather than keep fixing your 30-40 years old one? At what point it become cost prohibited Also, Naval architecture are specific for each design, if you need to add something new, you will need to redesign the layout of the entire craft, because when you add and remove stuff, you disturbed the buoyance and balance of the vessel. In commercial vessel, this is not a problem because ship usually comes with a lot of empty bulkhead, so you can add or remove stuff at will by balancing these bulkhead compartment, but in Military Vessel, empty spaces are few and far between, you don't get the same leeway you have in a commercial vessel.

[@eteocles4452]

Nimitz class carriers will in fact be in use for another 40 years or so. Each carrier has a 50 year life span which includes a mid-life refueling and overhaul. USS Nimitz is scheduled for Decommissioning by 2025(53 years after launch), George H. W. Bush should be in service until the late 2050's.

[@jilongxie6563]

USA is trying to abandon old Nimitz class aircrafts and focusing on building new Ford class aircrafts instead. In my estimation, USA and China will be building a lot of modern super carriers in 2020 to 2050.

[@hillsideballers8223]

​@Eduan Stander if s war broke out than you poke the bear than you would see 50 aircraft carrier build in no time

[@diegocruz8087]

Exelete vídeo

[@naman6491]

US Aircraft Carriers are absolutely majestic and massive. Watching Indian Aircraft Carriers are like watching an kid in front of an adult.

[@Life_isstrange]

What about others

[@ig-anzros01]

Or koi nahi Mila?

[@pravinbhoyar4874]

But this kid has massive Growth

[@Sonia_Godfray_Hindu]

Their navy is 245 years old and our 75. Massive difference

[@chendavid610]

@@pravinbhoyar4874 does not grow faster than China

[@ayushpatel2171]

India🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

[@morgan4373]

Gonna have to lower some expectations on that new Russian carrier I reckon.

[@carlbyronthompson]

I pilot the USS Flag class carrier. :)

[@styid9116]

If You MODERN WARSHIPS GAME PLAYER You Will Know It Assault Carrier/Bomber Carrier (in game) 1.(RF) Shtorm Class Project 23000E 2.USS Enterprise CVN-80 3.CN Type 004

[@abcdefgh-hz6pk]

ROKS CVX

[@landflame]

Those still in the design stage should NOT be counted as upcoming aircraft carriers

[@meritoriousgamer]

. 🇺🇸USA:3 🇮🇳INDIA: 2 🇨🇳CHINA:2 🇷🇺RUSSIA:1 🇫🇷FRANCE:1 🇰🇷S.KOREA:1

[@sadat_41]

🇺🇸USA:3 🇨🇳CHINA:2 🇮🇳INDIA: 2 🇷🇺RUSSIA:1 🇫🇷FRANCE:1 🇰🇷S.KOREA:1

[@meritoriousgamer]

INS VISHAL 😍

[@aryanyadav3690]

INS Vikrant is ready & in sea trials ⚡

[@chendavid610]

Small tho

[@anonymous-qt7wq]

@@chendavid610 it was our first indigenous aircraft carrier , the navy has plans to build a 3rd aircraft carrier which would be about 90k tons ✌️✌️, I know it is small but it will be the pride of our country ✌️✌️

[@chandanamondal5771]

@@chendavid610 Small one is not bad. It would be helpfull in navigating fast.

[@chendavid610]

@@chandanamondal5771 just hope the uncleaned septic don't burn the ship down again lol

[@mdyeasin-io3sv]

size is omne thing but quality and experience is another

[@victormiranda5895]

We the people USA always first God bless America my home sweet home.

[@sanatanihindu3089]

Indias third air craft carrier INS vishal is mostly Nuclear powered air craft carrier Displacement 70000-80000 ton

[@LarsonChristopher]

India should buy the Nimitz class carriers from America.

[@manishsahoo3161]

@@LarsonChristopher no need

[@rohitb5834]

@@LarsonChristopher no thank you.

[@lordlee6473]

That French one looks about the same size as the Korean one, so how can it’s displacement be 30,000 ton more? Makes no sense.

[@layof75]

They made a mistake... French one should be way bigger ! Something between the first Chinese and Indian ones in the video to give you a rough idea

[@XavierLeFrancais]

because the vidéo make a mistake: the French Pang will be 305m long...

[@styid9116]

Modern Warships Player Know It🗿 Include Me🗿

[@marcofava]

No mention of the Italian Trieste which is currently in sea trials and commissioned next year?

[@fetusofetuso2122]

Trieste non è classificata come portaerei (CVN) ma come portaelicotteri d'assalto anfibio (LHD)

[@erosgritti5171]

@@fetusofetuso2122 Come saprai avendo perso la guerra, gli americani imposero, nella costituzione, che non potessimo avere portaerei. Quindi abbiamo fatto all'Italiana.

[@India20504]

INDIA🇮🇳👑

[@majscrap2629]

I loved it when they asked an Admiral what he thought of the Chinese carrier. He said: "it's a single large target"

[@Wilhelm8e]

From the Chinese side: So are the American ones, only they are more expensive, LOL

[@williamwongkimping3998]

@@Wilhelm8e 😂😂😂😂😂So true

[@lordlee6473]

Lol. Can you name the admiral? Did he also say US has a carrier killer called DF17

[@LarsonChristopher]

@@Wilhelm8e Carrier Battle Group is the significance.

[@LarsonChristopher]

@@williamwongkimping3998 Its been a long time since the US lost a carrier in combat. Many carriers have broken the backs of nations. Its easy to get cocky about military tech if the tech is never used. You could always use your carriers against North Korea and gain favor with the rest of the world. At least that will let you know what problems are in the carrier design.

[@robwyyi]

Problem with carrier is expenses for it. Not the cost of building it but it’s is rather large. Examining Soviet now Russian carriers and its existence gives a ideal how difficult it is for a nation to have a carrier program. Program I say because a infrastructure is needed. First in the program is having a dry dock to build and retrofit carrier. Carriers like all boat needs lots of care. This brings why Russia is in a difficult situation. Their dry dock for carriers is in a another nation, Ukraine Mykolaev. On the side note, one objective Russia will likely not accomplish. With the dry dock skilled labor must be sustained. Building and retrofitting carriers. The thing about labor for carriers or in general is each ship has its one specialized skilled labor. With the dry dock sub group of industrial plants are needed. From iron works, rope manufacturing, modern electronics etc. I think you get the ideal of supporting plants. This is just the ship it self. One that is even greater is aircraft. But specialized a/c, that can land and launch from a ship. This can be explain by the f16 & f18 program. F16 was originally a Naval a/c and f18 Air Force. The end it switched branches. It turned out the f18 could manage heavier landing gear and f16 unable to fit a heavier landing gear for carrier landing. Naval aviation requires many more adaptation verse land based a/c. Which explains the programs magnitude of program needs. Now you need the pilots. Which due to landing on carriers add additional or rather more then double the time to make a naval aviator. All this adds up to a extensive programs and infrastructure to maintain a carrier program. Which most nations need to be a rather large economy to sustain a carrier program. Not many nations can do this or afford to. Using Russian example is once they built their carrier due to lack of naval aviation program the carrier never made it out to deployment for lack of a/c. India and China is possible to have carrier program but both have long ways to sustain it.

[@dom7day]

USA knows how to build carriers like the Germans always knew how to build tanks. Also, it's one thing to build these things and totally another to know how to effectively use them in combat, more importantly to protect them

[@tritium1998]

Other countries can build and operate their own weapons and more.

[@scotttild]

Building them and using them in combat is two entirely different matters. China is at least 40 years behind the U.S in combat ready aircraft carriers. U.K could not even effectively use one during the Falklands war, they had limited range and could not stay on station for extended combat. Russia cannot even get one out of port. China has almost zero overseas bases, they have no friends in the world.

[@billygraham2132]

Carriers are for power projection against non-peer countries. And you are correct in pointing out the enormous training and logistical chain required to support these. The US cut it's teeth using multiple carriers in WWII, Korea, Viet Nam, Iraq, Afgjhanistan and then Iraq again. And we have a completely unmatched global support program. Russia has ONE overseas port; in Syria. China has none, but is pumping money into Africa. I believe during the next 40 years NATO/China/Russia will have perfected hypersonic swarm weapons that will make the world a very dangerous place for carriers. Except for beating up on lesser opponents; this is how the US has used carriers since Midway.

[@luckgood6905]

No, no, don’t believe what they say, we don’t have an aircraft carrier. We piled up type003 in cardboard boxes. The 16 17 aircraft carrier is a fishing boat, and the aircraft above is inflatable. The aircraft above is inflatable. The takeoff and landing of the aircraft you see is made by CG. South Korea and India are the greatest countries in the world. They have already begun to build neutron battle stars.

[@pengpeng5984]

Yes

[@mediador9161]

Now what

[@ziqiangyuan234]

Some are under construction, while others are only on ppt.

[@KangoV]

Which countries in the world will allow a Chinese aircraft carrier to port to resupply? I doubt there are many. This is a MASSIVE limiting factor in projecting naval power across the world.

[@marcofava]

It all depends on what the strategic uses of the aircraft carrier are, China seems to be solely focused on the Pacific and Indian and in this case they don't need many ports to replenish as Pakistan, North Korea and the few African bases are enough, further deployments would be hard and would require st sea replenishment by auxillaries

[@tritium1998]

Plenty of ports need Chinese supplies too. Chinese naval stops will just remain lowkey to make you sleep better at night thinking the world revolves around you.

[@jilongxie6563]

Most of the Chinese carriers will be used in South China Sea, and one to two of them will be used in Indian Ocean.

[@lisaroberts8556]

Yea….I doubt the CCP Carriers will leave the South China Sea. They won’t stray that far away from home. Or roam the Oceans like the US Carrier groups. I think China’s Carriers are more Defensive rather than Offensive Weapons.

[@simonyip5978]

Money talks, and the Chinese have agreed with many countries to build and jointly operate ports and infrastructure that have clauses to allow PLA Navy vessels to refuel and carry out maintenance and resupply.

[@大日本帝国-k2s]

Sweden is actually planning on building an aircraft carrier

[@francoism2232]

Really ? To be in which sea ? As a Belgian guy, I'm still impressed by the fact that Sweden - a small country in term of population - has its own independent army, its own planes (Grippen), and now you're speaking about its own aircraft carrier. How can Sweden manage that ?

[@大日本帝国-k2s]

Baltic sea

[@francoism2232]

@@大日本帝国-k2s Hello. But Baltic sea is smaller than the range of a plane, no ? So why should a carrier needed ?

[@大日本帝国-k2s]

Sweden is afraid that russia will attack gotland and since gotland is like an aircraft carrier sweden thought it would be safe to buy an aircraft carrier as a reserve

[@francoism2232]

@@大日本帝国-k2s Ok thank you, force to Sweden.

[@jonnyrawket8158]

Why do all these channels still think railguns are being pursued. The US railgun program is dead in the water, and based on lack of any info from known development sites it’s assumed the Chinese one is as well. It’s just not worth the cost to performance ratio over a normal weapons system. Lasers sure, but you should really do your research.

[@michaeldendulk9225]

Dead in the water as hypersonic missiles have pretty much made the concept useless (besides being hard/expensive to implement on existing assets).

[@billygraham2132]

Hypersonic missiles > rail guns

[@jonnyrawket8158]

@@billygraham2132 hypersonic are also going to be irrelevant eventually.

[@CorePathway]

@@jonnyrawket8158 sPaCe LaSeR

[@jonnyrawket8158]

@@CorePathway nah just better interceptors lol

[@poxous3854]

You know the video is good when they put CVN81 before CVN80....

[@stone8905]

Hello There! Great video. Didnt find any information about Chinese aircraft carrier type 004 to be ready by late 2020, is it mistake if not could someone provide me link? Thanks

[@derekma4578]

type 004 does not exist.

[@goodfella1234]

@@derekma4578 : then why Putin in the recent interview acknowleged that China has 4 aircraft carriers? You know more than Russian intellengence service?

[@zwen3763]

Nothing has been confirmed about the type 004 its all speculations at this point. The PLA never goes into details about their plans so pretty much any "leaked" information you see are speculations.

[@许小龙-b4y]

No official news at all, but there will be news when 003 is completed,

[@timc513]

@@goodfella1234 guess they counted type 075 as an aircraft carrier

[@themaestro3034]

I doubt Russia is gonna be in any position over the next few decades to even consider to start building carriers

[@vokalboy21]

So happy to see one the Worlds biggest Democracy in India 🇮🇳 is rapidly becoming one of the top armed forces in the world! Congrats from the USA 🇺🇸 - Jai Hind from your American brothers!

[@Harshitrana1231]

Thanks Bro also Bro india will Make more Aircraft career of weight 90,000 Tone

[@simonyip5978]

I have a feeling that you are not American, but actually Indian. Most Americans think that India is a dirty, poor, corrupt and weak country, very few Americans would even know that India is a democracy and very few would know what Jai Hind even means.

[@BadwolfGamer]

Royal Navy may need more than just 2 Air Craft Carriers.

[@johnc2438]

...and they always have needed more than just two carriers. They need at least four!

[@BadwolfGamer]

@@johnc2438 Yep if they lose 1 and then the other then the navy is screwed meanwhile china has atleast 10.

[@ingurlund9657]

They should build two more QE carriers. Batch 2. But bigger at 80,000 not 65,000 tons. And India should build two big ones too so Britain and India can dominate the Indian Ocean and support Australia with up to 8 carriers total.

[@许小龙-b4y]

I think what they needed is aircrafts for their carriers

[@billygraham2132]

What is the use-case? Carriers are used to project power. What colonies does England have left to protect/bully?

[@fouly1981]

INS VIDHSL 2030...? 🤔 Who will determine this estimate?

[@HOGWARTSEXPRESS-HE]

Hey virus 😉

[@meritoriousgamer]

INS VISHSL , it will be a nuclear powered aircraft carrier.

[@fouly1981]

@@meritoriousgamer We all know that it is a nuclear powered aircraft carrier. But no one can determine the date of service.

[@subhrajitgupta5535]

Yes we can determine. The 2nd AC is almost commissioned as its in late stage of trials and now time for 3rd and multiple designs are also aired. It might be commissioned by 2028 which is before time deployment. Sorry, but now there will be no 1 big power.

[@Himanshukumar-ek7fh]

@@fouly1981 It will start construction on 2023 as Report said , for now india is focusing on 6 SSNs submarine . Wait it will commissoned by at max 2032.