Having been knocked out in an auto accident and scrambling your brain. This guy should have had medical care. They should fire that officer. The officer showed a total lack of interest in proper investigative procedure, a total lack of compassion towards not just this man but other people he comes in contact with.
@eltorocal4 ай бұрын
They refused medical care because that would have given the defendant Access to a Blood Test.
@lint83914 ай бұрын
The prosecutor should have taken 1 look at the video evidence and said "No way I'm taking that to court... But I might prosecute the cop for an unlawful arrest."
@jays1064 ай бұрын
that would never happen with the good buddy system
@victorforzani34334 ай бұрын
Just think that this police officer didn't even call medical services, he could be sue if he is found innocent any way, so he got 17 year in service, sound like he shot himself in the foot...
@lint83914 ай бұрын
@@victorforzani3433 I agree. As I commented in a previous video in this series, the cop arrived at the scene in a bad mood and took it out on the defendant.
@victorforzani34334 ай бұрын
@@lint8391 I have to say that police officer should not bring their garbage to work and I saw that he didn't wanted to spend time on that traffic stop and by the way he spoke to other officer it must be close to the end of his shift, I hope he sue that officer of 15+ years
@FlyingSquell4 ай бұрын
This should have never made it past a prosecutor’s desk, much less to a jury.
@lananavan18854 ай бұрын
Exactly right
@shadowbeast22764 ай бұрын
The one thing the prosecutor refuses to admit is his officers gave the defendant the option of a "blood test" but they refused to do it and came up with excuses as to why they didn't want to do it.
@famlauriek73534 ай бұрын
Agree👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻🇺🇸
@RickJohnson-vn5ys4 ай бұрын
Prosecutors can care less about anyone, they are devil worshipers with no souls what so ever
@zippythepinheaddotorg21334 ай бұрын
Speculation and "common sense" is NOT evidence. This prosecutor should be ashamed for bringing this case.
@Mark-fc2zk4 ай бұрын
There was clearly no common sense used by cop or the prosecutor in this case
@marcushaynes4216Ай бұрын
Dude I literally got charged with a DUI over a simple expired tag. Told the officer to just give me my citation and I’ll have it paid by the court date, the officer said naahhh I’m not doing that and fabricated probable cause DUI cause he seen that I already had a dui from 6months ago. The DA still filed the charge with no concrete evidence cause refused the bs test. Just the officers bs testimony that my speech was slurred, red eyes and odor of alcohol. Unbelievable.
@jameskirk34 ай бұрын
I have no idea why that nurse didnt say "He needs a hospital, now." but if I knew someone I cared about was knocked unconscious, split their lip and broke their teeth, I would get them to a hospital right away to get help. When you have a seizure or a concussion, and then minutes later are accosted by a VERY aggressive cop, I don't think they would be themselves. Slick of the prosecutor to call a blood alcohol content a "breath alcohol level" lmao. Dirty pool...
@liset40814 ай бұрын
Noooo! I need a not guilty verdict now. Keep us all waiting anxiously till tomorrow 😅 I better be not guilty! Excellent closing 👏🏻
@terryhayward79054 ай бұрын
There is one small point that the defense missed, the officer asked " CAN " you do the tests, not " WILL " you do the tests, the reply was no, the next question should have been why in that case. He did NOT refuse, he answered a question. The prosecutor is as big a liar as the officer.
@AudunWangen4 ай бұрын
In every step of the way, cops should learn to ask why, and then clearly state the result of a refusal. They didn't do that when he was brought to the correctional facility either. Horrible police work, just as I expect for US cops.
@B_Bodziak4 ай бұрын
The defendant said three times, "This is NOT a refusal."
@klesko554 ай бұрын
I think the cop included. He was under the influence immediately and didn't care to investigate any further. The cop was lazy and didn't want to do his job
@jillmax3984 ай бұрын
I like the attorney that works for you Larry. He’s really good. You did good. You trained him well.
@paul-u2y9y4 ай бұрын
I think he needs to tone down the dramatics.
@joanneriley38994 ай бұрын
@@paul-u2y9yGolden! lol. it was his first case, I believe, and he was nervous. The only way is up!
@ProudCapitalist-ko9ff4 ай бұрын
The prosecutor did a crappy job presenting his case, partly because it was a crappy case thanks to the incompetence of the cops.
@Southernswag82834 ай бұрын
I don’t understand how a man can wake up, Come to work and casually try to ruin someone’s life KNOWING there is no evidence to actually back it up. Imagine only caring about “Winning” your case instead of siding with justice and truth… You have to be an evil man to casually do something like that without any guilty conscious.
@sandymarcus14934 ай бұрын
He asked 10 times for a blood test!!
@chavt664 ай бұрын
This should NEVER have gone to trial.
@GarryFishermusic4 ай бұрын
When the prosecutor presented his non evidence evidence and said just Ignore the defendants evidence completely. What a sick joke , the commonwealth had no business trying this terrible case with more doubt and holes than Swiss cheese .
@devonmarr98724 ай бұрын
He honestly tried to claim that there lack of evidence should prove to the jury that the decendant is guilty because THEY were not able to get the evidence they wanted.
@GarryFishermusic4 ай бұрын
@@devonmarr9872 Great point , the prosecutor seemed like he waved the white flag of surrender ,he had no passion or fight in him .
@Chis564 ай бұрын
This judge is a diamond
@lint83914 ай бұрын
I agree. She seems like she'd be a lovely person to spend time with outside the court. And in this trial she behaved in an impeccably professional way. Can't ask for more than that from a judge.
@Chis564 ай бұрын
I’ve watched many vids and she is so professional,approachable, and very knowledgeable
@shadowbeast22764 ай бұрын
I agree she's awesome.
@AudunWangen4 ай бұрын
Calm, organized, efficient, fair and clear. Everything you would want in a judge.
@famlauriek73534 ай бұрын
Nice human!!!👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻🇺🇸
@croach21944 ай бұрын
The new attorney will be amazing. Tyler really improved as he went along and got into the rhythm of his closing. Larry - such suspense.
@TstanDa-Man4 ай бұрын
This prosecutor wants the jury to convict a guy of a serious charge of DUI not from breath or blood test or even roadside that they didn’t do any of those test but just by their experience with drunk people. What a joke
@shadowbeast22764 ай бұрын
What "EVIDENCE" did the prosecutor provide? All he showed was the arresting officer FAILING to investigate, refused to listen to defendant,slapped the cuffs on the defendant & arrested him for DUI, while admitting he didn't smell alcohol. Personally, I think the only alcohol officer Payne smelled was on herself. She was the one that was refusing to give him the blood test. WHY DON'T YOU HAVE BLOOD TEST EVIDENCE? He was in an accident. How do you know he wasn't suffering from a concussion? Is the officer qualify to make that determination? Is he a medical professional? The fact that nothing was seriously wrong with him per se has absolutely nothing to do with it Basically the prosecutors asking them to overlook the fact that there was absolutely no physical evidence to support the fact that he was intoxicated.
@jameskirk34 ай бұрын
She said she smelled alcohol and that he was flushed because they ALL say that. It's standard for all of the officers involved, I'm honestly surprised that Purcell didn't testify to it as well, but he is obviously not a DUI enforcement officer. His usual job is obviously much more preferable to him.
@jameskirk34 ай бұрын
The judge should've directed a verdict. I'm amazed she didn't. I thought she was great throughout, but the motion for a directed verdict was valid and probably the best case for it that I've witnessed. She should've taken it and acquitted the defendent.
@shadowbeast22764 ай бұрын
@@jameskirk3 she "magically" smelled alcohol. She refused to do the blood test even though it was a option
@shadowbeast22764 ай бұрын
@@jameskirk3 agreed
@B_Bodziak4 ай бұрын
I know someone who was arrested for a DUI following a one car accident -- she apparently hit a curb and blew out two tires out. On the body cam, the officer claimed he smelled alcohol, but her breathalyzer reading was 0.0%. He arrested her for driving under the influence of drugs and she had blood drawn at the jail. She continued to deny taking any drugs, except for her high blood pressure prescription medication. She couldn't remember the name of the drug. She spent about 18 hours in jail because she couldn't remember anyone's phone number to call. One of the officers seemed to take a bit of pity on her and did an online search for one of her relatives (me) and was able to get my home phone number and allowed her to use his desk phone to call. She sounded strange on the phone, but I assumed it was because of the stress of being in jail, and I arranged bail. After I picked her up, I could tell something was wrong with her and drove to the ER. Her MRI showed she recently had a small stroke. Her blood test came back with no mind altering substances, but the district atty changed the charge from DUI to reckless driving... Why? Because on the body cam, the officer asked what happened to tear up her tires, and she said she couldn't remember. He asked her if she was using her cell phone while she was driving, and her response was, "I don't know. Maybe.". She got an attorney and opted for a trial. The judge looked at her blood test and her ER report and dismissed the charge but not before scolding the district attorney. I can understand the officer thinking she may have been taking drugs, but the DA going forward shocked me. Between the 10% bail bond fee, the court fees and the attorney, she was out $5586.
@sparky38694 ай бұрын
If I was on the Jury, The first day I would already have found him not guilty
@jonathanrichards67994 ай бұрын
"The defense wants to point out all the stuff we don't have... but what about the question I asked earlier about seeing drunk people? None of you had to breathalyze them to know" Totally missing the point of evidence. They need to recall that DA
@jewels40284 ай бұрын
😂Well yeah we do need some test to Prove beyond reasonable doubt the man was impaired! You're charging him with a crime! What a Moron & embarrassment to the dept.
@mahgrew10044 ай бұрын
That prosecutor is nutty as squirrel poo how on earth did that pass the bar ???
@Bloodborn4204 ай бұрын
Bro i absolutely love watching you two work. So cool. Thx for content buddy
@croach21944 ай бұрын
I have never understood why the case was prosecuted. Very poor judgment on the part of the prosecution. About as poor as the responding police officer. I am also not impressed by the technician who I do not believe when she said he reeked of alcohol. The officer had to admit he did not even smell it so it is hard to believe he smelled strongly ½ to 1½ hours later. Perjury on the part of a police officer is terrifying to most of us.
@jays1064 ай бұрын
they commit Perjury all the time yet are almost never if ever charged for it. yet if we do it then all hell breaks loose for us
@Chis564 ай бұрын
That nasty judgemental cop needs to be retrained , his attitude towards the accused should have been handled with respect and dignity
@garywacaser62304 ай бұрын
Yea, just like they never do. 😡
@Nothing-y7l4 ай бұрын
retrained? with all the "authority" WE THE PEOPLE gave him.... you want "retraining"? How about fired, blacklisted from ever working for We The People again.
@Linghunt24 ай бұрын
retraining is BS. He was just a fool with a badge.
@jays1064 ай бұрын
@@Linghunt2 as many are
@plutotech4 ай бұрын
Ahh. The ole "training" excuse. You can train someone not to be a lying douchebag?
@marcziegler77344 ай бұрын
If the accused found "Not Guilty" can he turn around an slap the Clown 🤡 (s) with a lawsuit for illegal arrest an charges?..
@B_Bodziak4 ай бұрын
I think if a defendant is found not guilty in a state criminal case, the prosecutor's office should have to pay the legal costs to the defendant. It's one way to cut down on weak cases
@AngelBabyMama4 ай бұрын
Wild! What a gross person. He shouldn’t be a prosecutor.
@sandymarcus14934 ай бұрын
This prosecutor has no clue what an accident can do to you when you smack your head on the steering wheel ca. do to you!! I was just recently in an accident and was smacked in the face with the air bag and the police NEVER SPOKE TO ME!!No one ever asked if I was drinking or the driver was drinking!! This guy is crazy!!!
@user-uc6kc8hn5s4 ай бұрын
Why did you not call him out for saying "he refused everything "
@normcaissie55984 ай бұрын
I don't get why the defense goes first. The prosecutors words are the most fresh in their minds.
@jondoe86004 ай бұрын
The prosecutor goes last because he has the burden of proof. trump complained about the same thing. It's just how it works, going last balances out the prosecutor's burden by giving them the last word.
@tommyroberts8674 ай бұрын
The only thing they had was that the female officer said she could smell alcohol. That's not proof
@ewetho4 ай бұрын
After the officer who took him in could not
@digitallymarketable4 ай бұрын
I wish they would have asked her, why do you think you smelled the order of alcohol and the officer didn't. OR something very similar but worded correctly.
@margelittleboy4 ай бұрын
As a nurse I can’t believe this man was not taken to the hospital to be evaluated for possible head trauma/concussion (especially since the airbag did not deploy) - the bleeding from the mouth, the broken teeth, the speech impediment & his unsteadiness on his feet, these are all indications that there is an anomaly. If alcohol was in question a warrant could or would have been obtained for draw, while in the emergency room. If he had gone to the ER a draw would most like be done as part of the evaluation in making a proper diagnosis, doctors would need & utilize the results in coming to the proper course of treatment. I’m not sure if KY would/could utilize those results or if a different draw would have to be utilized & then processed in the state lab. Regarding the blood not being drawn while in custody. The policy needs to changed allowing the blood draw to occur when requested by the one in custody. The “it’s not policy” or “it’s not practice” does not hold water when the prisoner is told that the blow test “or” blood test could be done. If the blood test is not an option for the one in custody, then don’t bring it into the picture. It seemed an arbitrary decision to not allow the blood draw, even though the one in custody clearly stated multiple times his willingness to submit to the draw. Why are officers so quick to listen to a third party evaluation - the 911 caller statement - via dispatch, had him already decided that the man was intoxicated. As an officer you have to arrive on scene with a clean slate, the evidence will present itself.
@daveschannel7474 ай бұрын
Scumbag, low rate, low budget prosecution.. Well mannered, CONSTITUTIONAL 💪, Gifted Larry for the defense.. Im seeing a clear win for the defense! Good luck
@Jeni104 ай бұрын
Oh the cliffhangers!
@minitrucker88354 ай бұрын
I'm hooked on your channel.. good stuff. Wicked smart dude
@JamesKonzek-xr5zy4 ай бұрын
Prosecutors always like to walk around and tell people they're wrong. ☹️
@mikeselby7274 ай бұрын
I'm so hooked on this case good job putting this together. The system at work and a look at the dishonest work of the police and prosecutor. The judge is so good we need more like her.
@Jim_Snape4 ай бұрын
I have no confidence whatsoever in the jury.. They are only too happy to lick the state boot. I wouldn't have any confidence if the guy could prove he's never been to KY, and never driven a car.
@jeremy_trent4 ай бұрын
Defense kinda reminds me of Marty's young dad from Back to The Future....
@Secret_Squirrel_Scottishgamer4 ай бұрын
Come on george....... MCFLYYYYY ... OHH MCFLYYYYY
@KimHarrold4 ай бұрын
Crispin Glover. You're right.
@gsdogsmom4 ай бұрын
Yesssss I thought the same! 😅
@jeremy_trent4 ай бұрын
@@gsdogsmom I'm glad I'm not alone! Both in looks, the voice... I almost didn't say something cause I thought I might be the only one, lol!
@jeremy_trent4 ай бұрын
@@Secret_Squirrel_Scottishgamer Yes!! I couldn't recall his 'name' in the movie and all I could remember of the quote was "McFlyyyy" Haha, lol!
@dericksmith21374 ай бұрын
Huge flaw with all DUI charges: IF I have the right to refuse to perform a FST, then how can a refusal automatically give me a license suspension and arrest? Plus, blood testing regularly takes about 4 months for results. So how does a person get suspended while awaiting the results? That’s using Guilty until You Prove Innocence. The exact opposite of how the law reads, Presumed Innocent until Proven Guilty. How can you receive a Punishment without the evidence that Proves you’re Guilty? *I do not condone drunk driving, but… I so strongly support our rights that I hate the hypocrisy used against us by the courts and law enforcement.
@16MedicRN4 ай бұрын
Ya know, at least with this defense you can actually believe in your case and your client! Talk about 'common sense' 🙄 My flabbers are all gasted wondering how the prosecution could believe a word they were saying. The possibility of a man going to jail over this BS is just fine and just another day. How do they sleep at night 😳 I know you're going to win this, Tyler.
@wandahargrove61094 ай бұрын
The prosecutor is so unbelieveable.
@waltcoact19834 ай бұрын
Larry, you’re killing me! I need a not guilty verdict now!
@Tsaukpaetra4 ай бұрын
"trust your instincts, trust your common sense" literally the opposite of what you're supposed to do....! Holy crap!
@csb67724 ай бұрын
This to me personally is cut and dry. Not Guilty. If he's found guilty id truley give up any faith in our justice system.
@abbtech4 ай бұрын
Prosecution is a joke. The way he says the cop made the right decision not providing medical attention. So why not save lots of money and send this cop to the scene of accident to pre-screen if an ambulance is even necessary.
@atlantik7704 ай бұрын
The "Nurse" and the "Prosecuter" need`s a real job!
@aceking53604 ай бұрын
They shouldnt be in trial if there is no tests like a blood test to prove he was under the influence.
@hollystarks18104 ай бұрын
Thank you Larry! He said your common sense so many times he implied they’d be stupid if they found him not guilty. Facts and proof only. I wish you’d have thought to bring up how many accidents happen because of being distracted by our pets ! I haven’t heard the verdict yet but this man is NOT guilty in MY opinion. You guys are awesome to watch work. Hope I never ever need you put glad you’re there if I ever do!
@B_Bodziak4 ай бұрын
In this case, I think the defense choosing to go first was a smart move. No way the prosecutor is going to address all 17 points the defense made
@daveschannel7474 ай бұрын
The both of them are ridiculous! They tried, but couldn't get past the studious mind of Larry!! 💪 💪 💪 💪 💪 💪 💪 💪
@cajun_queen46494 ай бұрын
He had dip in his mouth. Dip smells like alcohol. When she said he had dip in his mouth, that's when I knew why she claimed to smell alcohol. That's probably why he was asking for blood test. Untrained people don't have any business having these jobs.
@thefreedomaffect51314 ай бұрын
Never ever take any test, give blood, breathalyzer, etc. Help your attorney and your case by doing nothing and saying nothing. Losing your license for a year is better than losing your ability to enter a country or having a DUI on your record.
@Weddingplanner744 ай бұрын
I appreciate that you include the sidebar dialogue in your videos.
@raymondgarcia33934 ай бұрын
Courts dont like to dismiss cases they see what ones they can get the most money out of ,we are numbers !
@amandasuppes66124 ай бұрын
What a slimy prosecutor
@thedaily304 ай бұрын
I don’t understand how that DA can spew that nonsense with a straight face. I guess “beyond a reasonable doubt” means different things to different people.
@Pjdemarco4 ай бұрын
OMG, @24:00, prosecutor is breaking the 5th amendment. Refusal to breath test shouldn’t be used against defendant. SMH
@Daireishi4 ай бұрын
Imagine being on jury and then become the alternate right at the end. Like, yo I'm invested now!
@Linghunt24 ай бұрын
Prosecutor just wants his Stat. He knows his case is CRAP.
@wanderingrebelinvestigatio20714 ай бұрын
When he has a legal right to give either breath or blood and a government official restricts his choice that he has a right to and then claims because they refused to take blood as he chose based on his choices that he somehow is the one refusing. I'm sorry the staff on shift are the ones that refused to do the test that they told him he had the option of doing
@KillaMilla05134 ай бұрын
DA's definitely give all lawyers a bad name because they always do everything in their power not to drop charges because their to worried about their cop buddies being happy and furthering their careers. They are never worried about the effects on the lives of the people they prosecute even when they know they're innocent and or have no evidence. This is why all immunities for cops,DAs and judges need to be removed. They will think twice about doing the wrong thing if they knew their actions have consequences just like everyone else that has to live within the law and not above it.
@Mystery-vf6cq4 ай бұрын
FTP! Abolish Qualified, and Absolute Immunity, Civil Asset Forfeiture, and The Gun Control Act of 1968 NOW!!!
@brucesmith91444 ай бұрын
Worst summation by a prosecutor I’ve ever heard. Why did this case even go to trial?
@jays1064 ай бұрын
the da in his closing basically telling the jury "ignore the fact that we had no evidence and that per your instructions you must make your determination by the evidence alone and just take our word for it"
@MrOMYSTARZ4 ай бұрын
Seems like an easy day on the job today.
@nashntth4 ай бұрын
The prosecutor is making me really, really mad.
@1politicalcowboy4 ай бұрын
The new associate is passionate, and that is great. I look forward to seeing him in the future as he matures. When the prosecutor says we don't need evidence to convict just our personal judgment, I almost fell out.
@jpc3474 ай бұрын
His argument that "we all know what a drunk person looks like" is one of the stupidest arguments I've ever heard in a court. I've felt that I've known when my friends are drunk but I've not known "beyond reasonable doubt" as a legal standard. If I were to testify in court as to their state of intoxication I'd only be avle to say that I *believe* that they were drunk, not that I *know* beyond reasonable doubt that they were.
@mikezupancic21824 ай бұрын
How is he allowed to claim that exercising his rights is evidence of guilt?
@mahgrew10044 ай бұрын
I love your new guy he's awesome your showing him how to do it right . And I love his hair too!❤
@uncommon4384 ай бұрын
disgusting??? no i thing we can put that away and upgrade to skunk, or snake, or useless like a fart in a space suit
@martystrasinger38014 ай бұрын
Is it common practice in KY for DAs to bring charges when they have zero evidence? I think this is the second such I’ve seen on this channel.
@devonmarr98724 ай бұрын
Their closing was truly disgusting. Trying to beat around the bush and claim thay because he wanted a blood test that that means he would have failed a field sobriety test and would have failed a breath test.
@legnasiul93664 ай бұрын
The young lawyer with you. It's a crazy great one. Learning but he is going to be one of the best. He wants to let go out his potential. Net to hold him a little. Because his brain it's going fast. He going to be great. Love him for a criminal lawyer.
@eltorocal4 ай бұрын
Looks and sounds as though someone in the department, or a "fiend" of theirs, family member... had a vendetta against the defendant.
@Cha-da-ska-dum4 ай бұрын
Been watching the case from the jump. I’m like come on Larry upload the full story. lol no no no Larry is definitely showing us a true lesson. Let us learn. Thank you Larry I predict not guilty
@VioletWings13534 ай бұрын
I really enjoyed this defense attorney's closing argument. As well as his accent.
@aceking53604 ай бұрын
Why cant the prosecutor tell the jury what reasonable doubt means?
@Dadstin4 ай бұрын
Can't wait for the verdict!!
@annoraxgames7774 ай бұрын
So... the prosecutor was saying the jury should give them a freebie because they presented absolutely no evidence & to apply their own "I know it when I see it" standard that could just as easily get things like autobrewery syndrome and any number of injuries and illnesses misinterpreted as being drunk? Feels like an appeal slam dunk if they come up with a conviction, because the prosecution clearly hasn't met any burden of proof at all. I don't see why this was submitted to the jury at all, should've been a judgment of acquittal from the judge.
@decur84 ай бұрын
STILL NO VERDICT? GOD HAVE MERCY!!! WHEN WILL IT END?!?!?!
@hlwra14 ай бұрын
It should have been mentioned that field sobriety tests are optional and should always be denied.
@jasoncurrie57754 ай бұрын
I always wondered what happened to Crispin Glover. Turns out he is a defense attorney in Kentucky
@Koolc774 ай бұрын
When they said the nurse checked his lip, did the nurse also check to see if he might have a concussion
@kaylas_diaries50584 ай бұрын
When will we have the VERDICT?
@williamgage48254 ай бұрын
Yep that was a low blow form the prosecutor..😡
@patrickwinchester21614 ай бұрын
WTF? A jail nurse is just that a NURSE , not a DOCTOR. Furthermore , a jails infirmary would not have an MRI machine. TY, I'll see myself out
@Mr.Redemption4 ай бұрын
This is another case that never should have made it to court.
@GillKennedy-tm9xx4 ай бұрын
Abolish qualified immunity ASAP! Prosecutor defo has a thin blue line phone cover and sticker on his car 😮😂
@jasonclay62184 ай бұрын
"The defense wants you to focus on the fact we have no evidence. "
@rufusbrownstone61904 ай бұрын
🦇 Same bat time, same bat channel 🦇
@annettekalimuddin69634 ай бұрын
Great job
@polachelliot914 ай бұрын
Hey, @The DUI Guy (et al): I'm originally from Kentucky and am a legslly blind student of criminal defense, yet somehow I never knew the jury was responsibe for assigning sentencing except in capital cases where the state seeks the death penalty and a second jury is conveined to determine whether the now-guilty convict will have that penalty evoked in lieu of a life sentence without the possability of parole. Oh well; I learn something new every day, especially on channels like yours. Also, I apologize for any misspellings and/or punctuation errors that arose likely due to my aforementioned vision impairment.
@TwentiethCenturyFoxy4 ай бұрын
You’re quite the charmer aren’t ya?! (I’ve only watched the first 15 seconds) 🤩
@gsdogsmom4 ай бұрын
Larry is ridiculously charming yes lol ❤
@brianbay32294 ай бұрын
Is there an opportunity for the defendant to find suit against the officer, the prosecutor and the agency that arrested him? The prosecutor, from what it sounds like, fired charges with zero evidence and asked the jury to ignore any lack of evidence. Would that be prosecutorial misconduct?
@Myeyeofthebeholder4 ай бұрын
We can all drink then drive... We just cant drink impaired. So it doesn't matter if he smelled like alcohol
@dennisnichols71234 ай бұрын
This case should have never made it to trial. Our justice system is messed up. This and other cases currently happening is proof of that
@T.Underwood-xl2nz4 ай бұрын
Defense's council has the Peeky Blinder vibe going on with his hair... Like it.
@Nightwalker-4 ай бұрын
He reminded me of Zorg (Gary Oldman) from "The Fifth Element"
@Chis564 ай бұрын
He definitely does
@16MedicRN4 ай бұрын
Love it ❤
@jessewilson86764 ай бұрын
@@Nightwalker-you beat me to it I was watching the movie again to catch the name
@KillaMilla05134 ай бұрын
You gotta love that during the whole trial, the commonwealthless kept trying to make it seem that the defendant was wrong because he didn't do their job for them. What a joke. at least the judge seemed to be very fair with both sides unlike Auntie Bev
@Sadlander24 ай бұрын
_"We don't need numbers, all we need is to look at how he was driving. He hit a car, making it hit the car in front of it, which ruined the day of 2 people"._ Does that mean that everyone who caused a car accident was automatically drunk? Also, he started by saying that this wasn't about whether or not the jury liked the cop or if they felt bad for the defendant because of his injuries...but they're supposed to feel bad for the 2 people whose day was ruined? Why even mention that? I thought this was about whether or not the defendant was driving under the influence.