Hopefully now everyone is happy with the changes to the bangers for this update. Lot's of changes the last few days and finally the VBCI is looking better
@sebastiankillin794010 сағат бұрын
For those who are a bit confused: The AIM-9L/I and the AIM-9L/I-1 are TWO DIFFERENT MISSILES. The L/I is found of the F-4F KWS LV, and was previously on the EF-2000 before it was replaced with the L/I-1, which featured a smokeless motor (now removed), and has been replaced with the AIM-9M.
@TheEuropeanCanadian10 сағат бұрын
Apart from the fact that the whole point of the video is that the L/I-1 isn't smokeless and everyone keeps saying that even though it's not true which is what caused the controversy. This is the whole issue.
@The_Panda999 сағат бұрын
Wait I’m not home rn. Are there other differences between the AIM-9L/I-1 and the AIM-9M? Other than the smoke?
@adudefrompoland57911 сағат бұрын
f111c still the same br as f111f despite it having less thrust and missing it's 750lb bombs, shoulder mounted aim9l, mavericks, tv guided bombs, outer wing pylons and propably a lot more...
@Canadian_Ale10 сағат бұрын
I honestly don't understand why it's not 11.3
@Truck_Company_845 сағат бұрын
That really pisses me off. We also need to add the fuel dump feature as well… Ausies love to use that.
@angelcod73594 сағат бұрын
Same with the tornado F3 late, it’s 13.3 even though it’s straight trash yet the KWS that’s even better than this thing is 13.0
@niallking276210 сағат бұрын
I think the issue with the "reload for balance" argument concerning the pzh.2000 was more to do with logic than historical accuracy. Gaijin were saying the reload was at 10 seconds for balance, which makes no sense as there are similar vehicles at similar BRs with better reloads. The Type 99 SPH sits at 7.3 with a 7.5 second reload and (on launch, this has since been fixed on the pzh) similar mobility. More pertinently, the PLZ 05 sits at the same BR of 7.7 with a 7.5 second reload AND the addition of spall liners in the turret, superior mobility (on launch) and a roof-mounted .50 cal. By all metrics, it is a better vehicle than the pzh was and yet the pzh was hamstrung by an inaccurate reload.
@RedXlV7 сағат бұрын
There's also the fact Gaijin *heavily* advertises War Thunder on the basis of its "realism". So it's *very* legitimate for players to get angry about unrealistic reloads being used for balance. Especially since if a vehicle is too strong with its current reload, they can always just increase its BR.
@josebarbosa57042 сағат бұрын
They can't make it better that the vidar overwise vidar users will cry that the vehicle is too high in br for its performance and will tank sales
@cookie654210 сағат бұрын
I just want them to give the RDF/LT THE RIGHT RELOAD SPEED
@cookie654210 сағат бұрын
Oh, I forgot, give it the correct armor too please, It's my favorite tank and I would buy it if it were correct
@storm93458 сағат бұрын
They did update the reload speed on the TT and premium now.
@inkozebadigbadig3710 сағат бұрын
what is the br system for if we cant give tanks their accurate factual reload because "it will get nerfed" moved it up in its fucking br then what is it for ???
@TheEuropeanCanadian10 сағат бұрын
Because there are other factors to a vehicle than just reload. If you move up a vehicle based on reload especially at that BR bracket, it will run into fully stabilized vehicles that it won't be able to deal with.
@WPope10 сағат бұрын
@@TheEuropeanCanadian that should not be a matter for SPH vehicles anyway. They perform pretty much the same at any BR
@TheEuropeanCanadian10 сағат бұрын
@@WPope Just not true unfortunately
@PierTrevi8 сағат бұрын
@@TheEuropeanCanadian Just like the char 25t?
@Elbereth_TV11 сағат бұрын
tertiary sources are just as good as primary ones, since the snail outright said that primary sources such as the manufacturer, the end users and secondary sources aren't believable and nerf things anyway
@TheEuropeanCanadian8 сағат бұрын
The different grades of sources are not as good as each other. That is such a wild statement
@purgetrapscorp7 сағат бұрын
I wouldn't consider promotion materials as "primary sources".
@Elbereth_TV30 минут бұрын
@@TheEuropeanCanadian my point exactly, Gaijin accepts phony sources for China and russian vehicles, but first hand sources for Nato gets ignored because they dont believe it.
@StealthySpace710 сағат бұрын
Still no CCRP symbiology for the Mirage's or Rafale. Literally a guessing game when to drop bombs in CCRP
@taj23329 сағат бұрын
Why are you bombing in a rafale lmao
@StealthySpace78 сағат бұрын
@@taj2332 I play a lot of sim, its easy points. But the problem persists even in the Mirage 4000 too. But also the Rafale has great IR+GNSS missiles that are dropped in CCRP, it would be nice to know when to drop them
@PaxBritannica345638 сағат бұрын
@@taj2332 Because its literally an omni role aircraft???
@taj23328 сағат бұрын
@PaxBritannica34563 yeah I get that but it's like people bombing in the eurofighter going after bases and stuff it just proves you are bad
@taj23328 сағат бұрын
@PaxBritannica34563 but as he said he plays sim not arb so my point doesn't stand with him
@jackmcaulay45411 сағат бұрын
hold up, bro killed astro lmao
@spacemane_official4 сағат бұрын
Next yeard day of bundeswehr in jagel (tornado air base) imma ask ;) cuz there will be tlwg71 (bavarian tigers) who fly since trance 1
@jon_34533 сағат бұрын
Eurofighter controversy Clicks video, concerned about Absolute Chad 🇬🇧 Typhoon 🇬🇧 having a issue with one of its missiles Finds out it’s German Typhoon that has a issue
@jacknickolstine33559 сағат бұрын
Idk bro, they consistently do stupid shit. Shit just look at the hmd's.
@jeremyberke742410 сағат бұрын
So they decide to give a missile not ANY german eurofighter carry ? Mmmh what very nasty moove can we claim a lot of stuff for other planes ? or tank ?
@Spearhead458 сағат бұрын
sonya is a joke. all of war thunder is a joke. "we balance the game by nerfing fire rate" 2S38----- hmmm..
@spacemane_official4 сағат бұрын
Accurate tho
@chayanne25607 сағат бұрын
Why the eurofighter dont have the fox 3 meteor?
@spongegobler34492 сағат бұрын
This is the first EF model, it doesn’t use meteors. I don’t think we’ll meteors until the 3rd model
@StanRichmond46 минут бұрын
Because they’re too good
@StanRichmond44 минут бұрын
@@spongegobler3449in game they say they’re T.2 block 10 but in reality they’re block 15 due to all of them carrying brimstones, not just the FGR.4
@solo-ch6ev10 сағат бұрын
Bro, i found out that i dont like lazer guided munition on the german eurofighter 😂did the german eurofighter use TV guided munition,🤔 if it did, i would love if the add it
@bokoblinlogic161910 сағат бұрын
BTW, IRL the brimstones are fire and forget, they will find their own targets to kill, you don’t even need to designate a target for it
@Prisoner42456 сағат бұрын
I want Russia to get a tor m1
@dw706510 сағат бұрын
I wish they would just give the Chappy its smokeless missile back already