I agree totally about one's principles. Your kin means nothing if they are corrupt or evil especially when they repeat acts of adharma with impunity. Very enlightening video. Thank you very much.
@debraisingh27433 ай бұрын
Analysis from a reasonable perspective to learn good lessons in life rather than being blindly orthodox. Kudos!
@poojakarera15007 ай бұрын
Thanks for info
@Justin-eq8nl7 ай бұрын
Is this document any where ?
@kalliedeorajh16147 ай бұрын
Our religion is so amazing. Thank you for sharing
@indraneelpal72187 ай бұрын
Shri Ram himself is a Maryada Purushottam, He cannot advise Vibhishan to marry a woman who was the wife of his elder brother. This false stories are deliberately made to defame Sanatan Dharm.
@use-spidermam20057 ай бұрын
So rama also advised sugriva marry tara who is the wife of vali who is elder brother .so she does not lose as her status as a queen and son became the king whom she had from vali.so he similarly advised vibhisana also the same to protect her status and not to defame her.he is a kind soul who cared for that women who is the wife of ravana who abducted his wife and so who caused many problems to him.
@use-spidermam20057 ай бұрын
Read the purans carefully the marriage of sugriva and tara is written in valmiki ramayana
@sdp30486 ай бұрын
Earlier Sugreev is married to Tara then vaali came out of the cave and banished Sugreev and married Sugreev's wife Tara and again after the death of Vaali the Sugreev again married his wife Tara... that's it
@indraneelpal72186 ай бұрын
@@sdp3048 Bali's wife was Tara. Sugreev's wife's name was Roma.
@SonofSoma1086 ай бұрын
@@use-spidermam2005give me the reference from Valmiki Ramayan
@Molly-UA7 ай бұрын
2:33 Доброго дня, ще кажуть, що Сіта коли ще дівчинкою була спроможна сама підняти лук Шиви, тому коли було сваянвара, майбутній чоловік повинен теж вправлятись з луком Шиви . А Рама не поспішав це робити, за лук першим взявся Лакшман, чим підштовхнув Раму . ( Цій варіант історії зображен на барільєфах стародавнього храму .
@shaffinamohammed2384 ай бұрын
Very informative
@tapasdebnath79846 ай бұрын
Plot twist: As per Valmiki Ramayana, there wasn't any occasion or ceremony gathering for Sita Swayamvar.😂😂😂
@Molly-UA7 ай бұрын
5:10 Доброго дня🙏, ще кажуть, що Равана вкрав Сіту, щоб помститися Рамі за свою сестру, якій Рама повелів відрубати носа, за те що вона до нього залицялась й хотіла стати його дружиною або наложницею. (Барільєфи храму). В цьому місяці на каналі Правена Мохана вийшов ролік про стародавній храм, на якому зображена історія Рамаяна, яка в деяких місцях дає уточнення ( для мене) чому так сталось...
@yuurishibuya47977 ай бұрын
How did vibhishana and kumbhakarana came to be known as rakshasas? They had a Brahmin grand father, they never strayed from dharma nor stopped worshiping their desired gods.
@TypicalIndian19817 ай бұрын
In the original Valmiki Ramayana Vibhishana never married mandodari it’s a folklore in the original Ramayana it’s never mentioned
@AjayYerrumshetty4 ай бұрын
Actually it is true he does marry mandodari as he needed to be full heartedly accepted
@TypicalIndian19814 ай бұрын
@@AjayYerrumshetty I have read the original Valmiki Ramayana he doesn’t marry read Ramayana and talk
@AjayYerrumshetty4 ай бұрын
@@TypicalIndian1981 usually that is what every one says
@AjayYerrumshetty4 ай бұрын
@@TypicalIndian1981 sorry u don’t have to be rude from what I heard he does marry mondodri but if u say you read Ramayana then k ur right
@TypicalIndian19814 ай бұрын
@@AjayYerrumshetty I apologise for my rude behaviour. But from the original Valmiki I Ramayan Vibhishana doesn’t marry mandodari and mandodari also is a pious wife she only cares about Ravana even though he was unloyal and cheated on her and was evil she still loved him and lamented and remained unmarried.
@SakataSamig7 ай бұрын
Nice video
@vigneshb53477 ай бұрын
I do not think Ravana’s wife would have married Vibhishana, it may have been a need for vibhishana bug Not for her. She was Strong, Intelligent, Loyal and Capable warrior. My understanding is she took monkhood and spent life is forest.
@TECHFNO7 ай бұрын
What is the age of Sita when swayamvar happened that means you can marry any age women because ravan is too much old for this swayamvar
@AksharaC77 ай бұрын
There was no Swayamwar. According to Valmiki Ramayan, Shree Ram was less than 16 years old when he went along with Vishvamitra. There is no mention of Sita Maa's age.
@HasanUnknown7 ай бұрын
[Quran 20:14]:- Indeed, I am Allah. There is no God except Me, so worship Me and establish prayer for My remembrance. [Quran 31:33]:- O humanity ! Be mindful of your Lord, and beware of a Day when no parent will be of any benefit to their child, nor will a child be of any benefit to their parent. Surely Allah promise is true. So do not let the life of this world deceive you, nor let the Chief Deceiver, deceive you about Allah. [Quran 24:22]:- Do you not love to be forgiven by Allah ? And Allah is All-Forgiving, Most Merciful ! [Quran 56:57]:- We have created you, so why do you not Believe ?
@ShreeSitaRam-Bhakt7 ай бұрын
@@HasanUnknownBhagavad Gita 10.8: I am the source of all spiritual and material worlds. Everything emanates from Me. Bhagvad Gita 10.39 "I am the generating seed of all living beings, O Arjun. No creature moving or non-moving can exist without me Bhagvad Gita 10.20 O Arjun, I am seated in the heart of all living entities. I am the beginning, middle, and end of all beings. Bhagavad Gita 10.2 Krishna Himself says: “Neither the hosts of demigods nor the great sages know My origin or opulences, for, in every respect, I am the source of the demigods and sages.” Bhagavad Gita 10.12-13 Arjuna said: You are the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the ultimate abode, the purest, the Absolute Truth. You are the eternal, transcendental, original person, the unborn and the greatest. Krishna is supreme god, don't come to a Hindu channel to promote your religion. You are disgracing your own religion by this. End of argument. Leave immediately
@Satyabhamakrishnan1086 ай бұрын
😢😢😢@@HasanUnknown
@ognyandimitrov39866 ай бұрын
And so it seems that Brahma pre-determined the Mahabharata by making Vibhishan a devout follower of Vishnu. Who would have guessed 😂
@sdp30486 ай бұрын
Earlier Sugreev is married to Tara then vaali came out of the cave and banished Sugreev and married Sugreev's wife Tara and again after the death of Vaali the Sugreev again married his wife Tara... that's it
@debraisingh27433 ай бұрын
Lucky for Tara matey!
@ancientruins28566 ай бұрын
Ohm
@ChessAtmosphere7 ай бұрын
Hello
@legendary22696 ай бұрын
Stop mixing scriptures, tell which version of ramayana tell which of these depiction and also tell the things which are not in the original Valmiki Ramayana so that people don't mix them.
@mohitshukla54075 ай бұрын
What's the point of narrating the incident of ram winning sita by breaking shiv dhanush in the video which is supposed to explain whether vibhishan married wife of raavan or not? Just to elongate the video? Utter idiocy.
@AjayYerrumshetty4 ай бұрын
Actually there is a point they are narrating why and happened before
@TimothyCastellano-y5o7 ай бұрын
Vibhishana was born a rakshasa, half asuras half human (demigod). Hybrid alien(god) humanAsuras were sometimes nice but later the Devas were good to the India people and asuras become more demonic like most not all. but in Persia the asuras were good and Devas didn't really like the Persian. Brahmin is good path
@ravindunethsara78577 ай бұрын
Vibishana seems an opportunitist who seized his chance at the throne. nothing more
@TypicalIndian19817 ай бұрын
This shows you haven’t read Valmiki Ramayana Vibhishana didn’t marry Ravana’s wife in the original Valmiki Ramayana and he also didn’t desire the throne he joined with Rama because of the evil Ravana as Ravana was evil
@patchiappangovindaraju15637 ай бұрын
Will an avatar who was of highest moral code request Vibishina to marry his brothers wife?. This how negative aspects of puranas mess Sanatana Dharma core values. Please do not spice up 🙏
@DayaGHK7 ай бұрын
Vibhishan chose to follow Rama who is God. If you follow God (in this case personally) where is he wrong.
@s_u_n_j_a_y7 ай бұрын
😋
@degolaskoma86077 ай бұрын
Traitor of blood
@TypicalIndian19817 ай бұрын
Traitor 😂 literally Ravana was evil and abused Vibhishana so unable to take his evilness and abuse he ran away plus Ravana kicked him out of the palace
@degolaskoma86077 ай бұрын
@@TypicalIndian1981 but he fought against his brother side
@TypicalIndian19817 ай бұрын
@@degolaskoma8607 because his own brother kicked him out and threw him out and insulted him and his brother was an evil tyrant he ruled the three worlds and was terrorising the devas and humans he was r@ping woman and his own daughter in law too that’s how evil Ravana was and he joined the side of supreme lord Shree Rama who is the supreme god himself everything that lord Rama does is for dharma so of course he joined lord Rama’s side
@degolaskoma86077 ай бұрын
@@TypicalIndian1981 of course lord ram side is the side of dharma but still he traited his brother and joined his enemy