Why The NEW Tudor Ranger Is Destined To Fail.

[@TheoandHarris]

Thanks to Harry’s for sponsoring! Redeem a Harry’s Trial Set for just $3 when you go to Harrys.com/theo&harris

[@my0.02cents]

That butt plug hour hand ✋️ 😳 I can't. After someone pointed it out I can't help it. All I see the hour and what time it is but plug. Ugh. Also after thought kind of design.

[@davidcoleman2796]

You should stop pushing disposable razors , they are garbage . To much money and they are bad for your face . Learn to shave with a safety razer like a real man . You get a baby smooth shave . A good one made in Germany or England will cost you $50 but it will last you for life .

[@rogerwatt8491]

Failing so badly that they're sold out all over the place? This is a truly great watch . . . less is undoubtedly more and, as a graphic designer, I love a) its negative space and b) the absence of all the unnecessary stuff cluttering up watch faces these days.

[@visiblemode]

Fully agree. This watch is getting trashed by people for having all the qualities we’re always asking for. More negative space, traditional styling cues, and no-nonsense tool watch features. I think it’s brilliant.

[@kcexactly]

You nailed it. I wasn’t going to buy a watch. I have always wanted a Rolex when I retire but I am not there yet. I saw the Ranger and it was everything I wanted. No date which is great because I am tired of fixing the date every time I put the watch on. No extra stuff to make it hard to read in the dark. I might of liked it a tiny bit smaller. The hands are so much easier to read than a regular Tudor. Now I am hoping to find a light brown vintage leather strap for it. It is so nice looking!!! They are selling like hotcakes.

[@motorradmike]

I love my Ranger. My ONLY criticism is I wish it were a 37 or 36; on my wrist. Other than that it ticks ALL the boxes for me!

[@anechoicchamber3237]

Much better in hand than in photos. Ignore anyone who hasn’t actually physically seen the watch. Not a fan of bracelets generally and bought mine today on the fabric strap. Just lovely. Solid, simple, legible, crisp. Perfect tool watch.

[@ekimandersom4478]

I seen it, and wasn’t impressed. Much better watches available in that price range

[@edrader]

i agree. my bracelet is on ebay and i wear mine on a maratac nylon strap. the only negative i see is weak lume, and tudor has fantastic lume (i've owned a pelagos). i actually like the color of the lume but forsaking luminosity for the faux vibe is kinda lame for a field watch -- and i actually use mine in the field. not a deal killer tho i love the ranger

[@LanningKann]

I got mine on the hybrid strap. I do like steel but I find myself preferring a strap most of the time.

[@tonytrinidad5294]

I find it hilarious these reviews are made without actually handling the watch.

[@vintageswiss9096]

My guy looks like he's on the back end of a 40 hour bender.

[@TheIronSnail]

Damn i thought i looked good in this one

[@eazye619]

I figured you meant Christian before I started the video

[@Theewatchdad]

Lmfao

[@davidcoleman2796]

He does look bad .

[@TommyRibs]

We’ve all been there. I would be curled up in the fetal position, he is making a video.

[@mikeymezer]

I have it and love it. I also have a couple explorers (36&39) I honestly love the new ranger. It will get much more wrist time than my Rolex’s and my other Tudor’s. And one of your biggest issues doesn’t exist. The hand set is without a doubt polished and plays very well with the light. There’s also a small polished edge on the bezel. You would know this if you ever handled the watch. Details me dude…this is the watch a lot of people have actually been waiting for. Destined to fail? Give up on the click bait and review watches you actually saw in person. Bashing nice things always makes you sound cool though, right?

[@jrgdrumsandwatches]

I really love a fully brushed case and bracelet, it's supposed to be a tool watch. And that's exactly what it looks like. Also I like that the dial is not full of text. I like the dial as it is. So for me they did a good job, your negative points are quite positive for me. Rolex doesn't do tool watches anymore imo.

[@mariosiaven2965]

100 Agree, my only wish is they should have offered in 36 mm as well

[@topsetjewellery]

Agree. In addition having the brushed hand and matte dial will certainly help legibility, which is what they must have been going for. Same as my Hamilton Khaki which is so easy to read on the move.

[@misterfreeze6545]

So the new Ranger is “destined to fail” because it’s not shiny, has only one line of text, isn’t 36mm, and doesn’t look like a modern Explorer? (which you admit is ill-proportioned) Seriously? The new Ranger looks much truer to the original design than the outgoing heritage Ranger, is smaller without all the negative dial space, and has the in-house movement. That corrects most of the issues that prevented the last Ranger from being very popular. The goal of the Ranger should not be to look like a modern Explorer, but to return to its tool watch roots. IE: functional as opposed to stylized. Just as the goal of the Black Bay was not to look like a modern Submariner. Your review should have compared the new Ranger to the outgoing one and the original... not the modern Explorer.

[@lukemcevoy2385]

Which is why I bought a Sinn.... ;)

[@lonewolfemcquade8133]

@@lukemcevoy2385 I take a Sinn 144 STSA Porche design over a Ranger anyday of the week witha rock solid Valjoux7750 movement. At least Sinn isn't second fiddle to anyone

[@andrewbrown5636]

Unless you handle one in the flesh you won’t see why it’s such a good watch ..it’s the best case/ bracelet and clasp combo by a mile in the Tudor catalog

[@okfinn1]

How does it compare to the black bay 36? ive heard the new clasp is great but the bracelet feels cheaper

[@birdwatcher1337]

Seriously, what a ridiculous video with a bunch of bs without even seeing the watch in person. I used to really like this channel too but the following has gone to their head.

[@nickgarcia5799]

I absolutely love the Ranger. It’s simplicity and versatility at a fraction of the cost of an Explorer makes it one of my favorite watches. This is a bad take on a great watch.

[@jasue2000]

Actually put it on and wear it… it’s freaking awesome. It wears like a dream, the bracelet is amazing, the size is great, and pure tool watch goodness.

[@wongjefx980]

I have one. Was on the fence about it, was looking for BB 36 or 41. Tried it on at an AD, and felt so comfortable. Back and forth for 2-3 days and got it. I get the negative comments about the style, painted indices, the off white markers, the space on the dial...etc... but hey, it the perfect watch for an imperfect guy...so we go together ha ha.

[@KS-vk7cc]

100

[@richhowe4139]

I'm sorry your Explorer is broken. I don't really agree with you about the Tudor Ranger being destined to fail. I think it is targeted toward a buyer who is different from you. They don't want to draw attention to themselves with their watch. The Ranger is for someone who doesn't want bling. This is for the person who wears t-shirts and old leather jackets and wants a really good automatic watch that will stand up to daily wear all at a great price. He or she doesn't want sparkle, he wants to add patina through the dings and scratches of life. This is for a person who is very comfortable in his or her own skin.

[@motorradmike]

Spot on, brother.

[@MrNickMulgrave]

I ordered the Tudor Ranger at my AD this week. Its uncomplicated simplicity is what I like about it. It tells the time clearly and that is all I want in a watch these days. And its reasonable price means I won't care if I scratch it. If other people don't like it, I really couldn't give a shit. I like it and that's what matters.

[@Ჽum]

@SOUL SEEKER There's nothing clickbait about it when it's something the majority of people in the community agree with. You can't really say "wear what you like" and be annoyed when people disagree with your opinion on a watch.

[@Sojourner88]

Wear what you like. People can wear a Daniel Wellington and enjoy it, and not give a sh*t about what the watch community thinks. But I enjoy discussing watches, their design etc... and my immediate reaction to seeing the ranger was ... "it looks kinda meh". Disappointing.

[@TheStducky]

If you don't care then why comment on the video saying that you don't care. If you really didn't care it would be just in one ear and out the other. Sounds like you really do care.... and i would have to agree with everything thats on the video. Anyways, more power to you. Not too late to cancel though...

[@barxondrumming]

@@TheStducky xD

[@Sojourner88]

@@TheStducky That is a good point. Apparently, no one else is allowed to discus and be critical of the watch because it hurts his feelings.

[@user-qv7rw7dq1d]

I like the ranger because it's a luxury watch you can wear in potentially shady places, and most people wouldn't be any wiser, for a great price.

[@VincentGeorgeOnSF]

"This would have been better if it was a Rolex Explorer 36." People are mad because apples aren't oranges.

[@Sebastian85]

Thats why I love the Pelagos so much. It is by far the most unique Tudor design without steeling from Rolex.

[@jb-hw9if]

The Pelagos is great. The indices make that dial complete and that specific blue is really nice. Personally for me, it's a little big. The FXD does wear slightly better than the standard.

[@lonewolfemcquade8133]

Agreed 👍 and I like the Tudor Monte Carlo heritage chronograph because it's a true Tudor design. Unlike black bays that want to be a vintage Rolex

[@kevinp4305]

The BB Ceramic is also unique to Tudor.

[@Sifanhassan4356]

The tudor north flag is the most unique watch ever very beatifull

[@bojannikolow1462]

I am the owner of Pelagos LHD, and I really wanted the North Flag. If I had the chance I would buy both then. North Flag worried me a bit with the very sharp edges on the top side. For this reason, I only got Pelagos LHD. I've had this watch for a year and a half and I still can't get enough of the design. There's something unique about it that I can't capture, like the golden ratio of composing a picture, or not enough to be perfect, and that keeps you always looking and keeps you in suspense. This is what I call a perfect design. The proportions of the watch are so good that even though it is 42 mm it does not look big and I was very surprised to find that it fits well even on fine women's wrists. Although it is a tool watch, it is very elegant and one can even use it as a dress watch, which is exactly why I chose the LHD model, because of the retro-looking luminova. Great Model!

[@512TXSDIY]

Picked my Ranger up yesterday from AD. Love it!!!! I like the brushed look personally. The bracelet is the best Tudor version so far. This is how all Black Bays should be.

[@Maarten_official_account]

I’m personally not interested in this watch but I can’t deny the fact that it looks pretty ok to me. The brushed case and bracelet are giving this watch its own personality just like my NTTD Seamaster. Finally a watch without all the technical specs and properties written on the dial. I don’t need the back of my car to say it has airco, ABS, fuel injection and a turbo under the hood. I know it’s all there and that should be enough. I hope all people who are purchasing this watch will create some awesome memories while wearing it.

[@ivanharlokin]

I recall reading that the curved "self winding" text on Tudor watches, is only used for those with ETA movements. So, when (presumably) the BB36 gets an in-house Tudor movement, it will have different text.

[@mchockney3664]

Good thing tastes are different. Most points here are reasons, why I bought it on the day after it's announcement and I've worn it every day since. And believe me: The press shots don't do it justice and there's definitely some nice light play going on!

[@jb-hw9if]

Ditto 👍

[@philholt242]

Same!

[@KS-vk7cc]

Absolutely

[@rickjason215]

You need to have the watch to make a review. I need to see a watch in person.

[@martinreuter1060]

Great video! I ordered my ranger last friday and now I know why. Because I will read the time and not a book. And because I know how this brushed case will look after one year of wearing with all these little scratches and dings and dongs. Man, this is the watch that Rolex doesn't offer under their name because of the lack of balls. I think the Explorer ever was a blinky toy for rich boys that never will explore anything. This new Ranger is reduced to the minimum. It's a watch. Maybe a high quality toolwatch. This is MY WATCH.

[@michaelriera6277]

They are All luxury, jewelry. If you want real purpose built watch get a Gshock.

[@bogarbill6331]

totally agree. I sold my 2019 Rolex Explorer and bought the BB pro and the Ranger this month. Beautiful couple together. The Ranger is top notch!

[@kavashaman496]

@@michaelriera6277 your damn right

[@j.s.3414]

"it looks too utilitarian" Well...that's because...

[@jb-hw9if]

I think the KZbin watch experts are hilarious. "Negative space", "needs to say chronometer", if I buy a watch, I know what it is. Too many words on the dial is old fashioned clutter. Just aside from the Ranger, although a Tudor thing, I've got to say I don't like the smile dial and to state 'self winding' I think is unnecessary. Great that Tudor made the Ranger with (polished) hands that are supremely legible and they removed all the nonsense. "While I was driving a car my Rolex reflected the light well", a cheap watch can do the same. Great that Tudor made a beautiful, nostalgic tool watch, a watch that meets an exacting tool watch design criteria. The cream lume appearance in daylight (you said green because you've heard other KZbinrs say it, it isn't green as it's seen in daylight) looks great against the textured dial that offers a transition from charcoal to black as a bright light environment is exchanged for dark and with an elegant dial appearance over which the hands are the prominent feature without needing to battle against the light show of dress watch indices. If you don't like a tool watch, don't buy it and don't review it from a inappropriate perspective. You shouldn't be so opinionated without even handling one. A desperate clickbait video.

[@KS-vk7cc]

Agreed

[@ed7384]

Yeah agree that was a shitshow

[@nicholaschavez6245]

I think Tudor did a really good job with the Ranger. Perfect? No, but really good. 37-38mm with white lume and a polished bezel? Home run. That said, I desperately want Tudor to put the MT5400 in the regular BB36 with a T-fit clasp, like they did with the S&G. I’d probably stop pining for an Explorer. However, for that reason, I’m assuming their business daddy will say no.

[@TheBlueOwlX]

BB36 with MT5400 + T-Fit clasp. HELL YES.

[@river1duck]

As mentioned by others, I do agree the watch had issues beforehand. I seriously doubt you broke the watch by diving/swimming with it. Most likely the seller had dropped or banged it around hard enough to dislodge the rotor.

[@drakemoore2942]

I work in finance and died when you said “and an accountant will see that watch and go, that’s what I see myself as” hahahaha. So true.

[@watchchimp3102]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/gqK0nXaFor2ofq8

[@WestCoastAce27]

👍 that you still have a sense of humor. Too many today would pout, call Michael names,…

[@QuartzCrisis]

You didn't break your Explorer! The watch was sold to you because it had mechanical issues, it just took you 2 full days to discover those issues. Somebody decided that it would be easier to just sell the watch than to figure out what's wrong with it and to pay for the service. Oh, and I own BB36 and I agree with you that it's a fantastic watch!

[@burritomaker69]

Don’t you think as someone that is in the field he is in that he would do his hw on a watch which I’m sure he has to do all day long for his job? I don’t think that’s what happened he likely would have noticed it was already broken if it was 2 days earlier in a random scenario similar to how he discovered it was broken. It likely just broke not because of misuse or anything but because Rolex isn’t as good as people make it seem.

[@Anchor7]

I could a afford a Rolex, but I bought a Tudor. I honestly feel like an asshole walking around with a 12k watch during times like these where people are struggling. I still feel like an ass with the Tudor lol

[@t.h.1982]

I actually like the simplicity of the Ranger; don't mind the negative space on the dial. Have already purchased it from my AD, just haven't picked it up. Can't wait to see the new bracelet as it seems to be a big upgrade to an already great bracelet. As for the Explorer, I have the new 36mm and the 39mm. Go with swimming with mine a couple of times a week and have never had any problems with it. Not sure what happened to yours but both of mine are rock solid and never had any issues with them.

[@watchenthusiastlondon]

Out of interest, which of the two Explorers do you prefer ? 36mm or 39mm ? Or is it a mood thing ?

[@t.h.1982]

@@watchenthusiastlondon I wear the 39mm. My wife wears the 36. She changes out colorful Barton straps based on the seasons.

[@jackrayner1263]

16:15 Tudor only puts the “self winding” smile text on the watches with eta movements

[@justinkalemkiarian8253]

I picked one up and have a few thoughts: -I bought it in a bracelet but ordered the fabric strap. I think it will look fantastic on the strap as it will move away from being a giant chunk of brushed steal. -the dial has a slight shimmer effect in direct sunlight which is cool. -it’s supremely comfortable. -I wish the lume was white. It would be an absolute home run if so. -I do wish it had just one more line of text, maybe in a smile configuration

[@gyang333]

Didn't the Explorer 214270 only come out in 2018? Aka it would still be under warranty? Or did you get the 114270?

[@wongjefx980]

I have one. Was on the fence about it, was looking for BB 36 or 41. Tried it on at an AD, and felt so comfortable. Back and forth for 2-3 days and got it. I get the negative comments about the style, painted indices, the off white markers, the space on the dial...etc... but hey, it the perfect watch for an imperfect guy...so we go together ha ha. Had it on at home, which is something I never do with watches; I usually take them off once I get in the door. A tool watch that can hold up to use, is all right by me.

[@roamy3605]

I was on my way through London at Heathrow heading back to the US 4 days ago (9/28/22) and of course I had to go into the Watches of Switzerland in the International terminal. Finally got to see the Ranger in person (my Tudor AD sucks and rarely ever has stock). They had the bracelet version and with the power of my US dollar (sorry UK) I was able to buy it at a really good price. I wrapped it up and took it home. Finally on wrist I will say that this is an impressive watch in my mind. I know this is supposed to be a re-interpretation of an older Ranger but I can't help but think of the Rolex Explorer 1016 from the past. This may not be a Tudor hit. I think the 39mm Pelagos and Black Bay Pro have taken that role, but it is a really solid contender for people looking for a great field watch. As long as they don't listen to too many reviews (like this one) before they try it on wrist, which is where this watch wants to live. This watch is so much better than this review implies. From a male perspective this watch is like a really nice looking woman who doesn't wear a lot of make-up and puts on nice, but not flashy clothing or jewelry, and can carry a very interesting conversation. At the end of a date you just want her! That's the girl I have and so is this Ranger.

[@vdbdg]

I’ve handled the Ranger and it’s the lume colour that bothered me. The rest is just stories you tell yourself. The more you show it the more I think I should grab one.

[@ams914]

I've never disagreed more with a review of a watch in my life. Hahahaha. Perfectly balanced tool watch at a great price. "Broad arrow" hand becomes "butt plug" hands LOL. Maybe brands should hate enthusiasts, after all LOL

[@iainsutherland1113]

I totally agree ! Everything they seem to think is a negative, I see as a positive. No shiny bits on a utilitarian field watch - sounds good to me !

[@steffenbaden-baden1274]

You are right with the fact that I don’t like the title of the video. That’s just for klicks and has nothing to do with the watch. But keep on and stay in line with the rest of the „experts“ 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@jonathanberndt5422]

You didn’t mention the polishing on the edge of the bezel which is a really nice detail. I have the 36 mm Explorer and am very satisfied, so I’m not in the market for the Ranger, but I love it for what it is.

[@BWen3]

Jesus my guy. You have to get over your disdain for any watch over 36mm. 🤦‍♂️

[@WatchDanReviews]

Did you go to Canada for denim inspiration?

[@hubertuswolfthaler]

If you jump from a boat into the sea and your watch breaks, that watch is a piece of crap, no matter what brand name is printed on the dial 😂

[@mikej5959]

Agreed! I dont get why he said that. Would be one thing if it was old and not serviced often but a well taken care of watch with modern shock design should be able to take that... Especially at the price ranges modern Rolex go for...

[@mikej5959]

Sometimes I think the camera is effecting what they say thats the more. understanding answer or michael knows more about business of watch selling than actual watches.

[@중주박]

I have a question. Did you see this watch and try on your wrist in person?

[@davidcoleman2796]

I was thinking of buying a Sinn 556 but it has to much space on the diel . It just looks empty. I can kind of see this now with the Ranger .

[@Xanduur]

I love this watch. It has become 1/2 of my minimalist 2-watch collection.

[@Teromi]

I say at least try it ... before you make a call - don't let a perceived consensus let you make an informed judgement .

[@SmurfPerfect]

The original Ranger, with a similar dial layout, is gorgeous. The problem here is the SIZE. Blowing up a 34mm watch to 39mm is what creates all that negative space on the dial.

[@jshwck4210]

You should be better informed. The curved self winding text is reserved for non in house movements. They wouldn't put it on this watch.

[@notenoughtime7274]

Good video and I like the focus on the small items that really differentiate and make a difference. The contrast between polished vs brushed and how this plays with the light, as well as the proportions on the dial and lack of dead space. Great future video on which watches and underrated gems do this best….

[@OneManReviews]

To me the BB58 blue is the perfect watch. The funny thing we did a family road trip to Orlando from the Toronto area a few month ago and I took my BB58 on a road. The watch did withstand everything perfectly. A several hot days in the Disney parks with kids. Swimming in the wavy ocean on a Cocoa Beach, pools, Disney park attractions and so on :)

[@Max_Dillin]

So it basically just didn't fall off? Because any watch can withstand that kind of stuff...

[@OneManReviews]

@@Max_Dillin I bet that MoonSwatch can't.

[@roe1963]

How can you review a watch that’s not in front of you ? The Ranger is actually a great looking tool watch . Tool watch !!!!! Get it . The brushed case and the polished hands … not Matt as you described do actually play on the light from many angles. The dial is in my opinion designed perfectly to be easily read, who cares about a gap really. The bracelet is Fantastic and for the price it’s a great watch . Why buy a explorer when this is a third of the price .

[@richpaul6806]

I agree. 39-42mm look better on my wrist but I cant stand empty space on the dial. It either needs a beautiful dial like a grand seiko, a complication of some sort or a large dive bezel that makes the dial smaller. Maybe they could have added a have index next to each numeral to push them towards the center a bit.

[@ryanperez4510]

Hands down the best do everything go anywhere watch. I got rid of my bb58 blue for the ranger. It packs so much punch with the in house COSC certified movement. The dimensions are amazing and the bracelet paired with the uncle seiko half link wears beautifully. I just think you are going off what the mass media is telling you instead of spending sometime with the actual watch. It’s designed to be a tool watch and not a Rolex explorer.

[@VMIyanks04]

It shouldn’t have broke since the Explorer is literally made to absorb shocks. I would tend to think that there was an error with the last time it was services. Or maybe you got a great deal on it exactly because there was a known problem with it and that person/location wanted to dump the watch problem onto someone else. I’m sorry this happened to you. I hope you got it serviced and kept the watch. I’m still saving up for an Explorer. I love it!

[@ramspencer5492]

I had my ideas about this one. Nutshell: sandwich dial... Polish on bezel.... Maybe additional tiny details (Don't over polish) slightly deeper black.... Bring the rose back.... Brushed hands.... Slim down to 38mm.

[@filippopucci4347]

"The new Tudor Ranger is destined to fail" ? I totally disagree, it is one of the best watches!

[@TheBloodCrazed]

Perfect Bracelet: 20 mm fully brushed, smooth tapper ( unlike the stepped 58’s), no rivets screwed pins, ceramic ball bearings & T-Fit clasp. Not a perfect watch but there is a sea of more expensive watches with a lot less going for them including their looks.

[@rickjason215]

The movement is worth the price of the watch. I don’t know what people who are critical want? More text? A busier dial? I would buy it, but I have too many watches that I can’t get in the rotation.

[@RagnarHoff]

Only negative i think is the colour of the lume. It's a bit overbearing while i love that it's a no-date, brushed, no text watch. I prefer minimalistic tool watches with a vintage vibe so this one is worthy of seeing in person. How is no text on the dial a negative thing? I always thought that info should be on the caseback while keeping the dial balanced with minimal text. You wouldn't wear your brand new shirt with the tag still on it. It's kinda like that for me.

[@purangesmith9053]

Personally I quite like the ranger, but it do think it looks like a Tudor homage of a rolex explorer. I also like all the points Michael doesn’t, lack of writing on the dial, hand style, brushed etc… but he likes white watches so what does he know! 😊

[@olivierorban787]

Rolex Explorer has it’s own DNA, the Ranger is an other tool watch with it’s own DNA too. Totally 2 different watches

[@cecaju9516]

I think the Ranger will do well. Tudor in house movement with a great adjustable bracelet for under $3K.

[@renedelapaans647]

Indeed , and with a 70 hours power reserve and 100 m waterproof. It is value for money

[@olivierorban787]

Hello I’m not agree with you concerning the Tudor Ranger. I had this watch for 1 week now, on my wrist, not on pictures. And it’s a dam F… watch. I like the 39mm, the fact that it’s all about simplicity, tooltastic, and discreet. First Tudor, and I’m not disappointed.

[@timeandtorque]

At that price point there are many other options (IWC, Breitling, Longines, Even Seamaster). The Ranger just doesn't make a spark, even the BB Pro - which I've seen people off-load at 20% under retail.

[@panorama4526]

Someone who sells plastic razors tells me something about a watch that he knows from photos? Seriously?

[@MrBacchus18]

I like the looks of the bb36 but it seems like it would be too small for my 7.5 inch wrist. I have a 37mm watch that always feels small.

[@bongkem2723]

dude, i swim and do stupid things with my watch and nothing can mess up its inside, the Explorer can absolutely withstand your jump into the water and your freaking little swim, let's wait and hear about it after the hospital time =)))

[@villagranvicent]

No need for clickbait headlines, the Tudor Ranger is awesome much better than the MoonCrap you guys love so much LOL

[@seansoobyiah9844]

You guys ever do trades? Like if I wanted to trade my datejust 16234 for the explorer 1?

[@GeorgesThoughts]

Crazy, I think its a stunning watch.. will be a classic way down the line

[@filippopucci4347]

I agree with you!

[@finewatchreviews3422]

Picked my new Ranger up a week ago and I love the watch. Just what it is supposed to be and then some. A beautiful watch.

[@TurnRiver]

Everything you said Michael is exactly the problem I have with Tudor in general. They're quality watches until you realize that you actually wanted a Rolex.

[@BOB-su2kd]

The main reason I bourght the Ranger was its a true tool watch. If you want bling get the Explorer, if you want a watch that you could travel the world with the Ranger's the one. PLEASE HAVE THE WATCH IN HAND WHEN REVIWING

[@railmastercnr]

Saw one, bought it, love it.

[@neilheslam1114]

What is this review all about! It is a ranger not an explorer and comparing the two is just ridiculous. The difference in price is absolutely massive. For a 38/39mm tool watch, for the price, the ranger is brilliant value. If your going to pull it apart, at least have one in your studio to justify what your saying.

[@TheBloodCrazed]

Agree completely. The bracelet is perfection. I don’t want Mercedes hands I prefer snowflakes and actually I like the hour hand instantly readable. If 39 mm is the perfect size for you then this is the perfect size. If you’ve got the wrists of a girl then buy the 36 mm Rolex. If they made a watch that looked exactly like the Rolex explorer what would we be saying then.

[@topsetjewellery]

Sorry to hear about your Explorer. They do say that quartz movements are more durable for that sort of activity, which is making me want a more high end quartz watch that looks great and can cope better with sports and swimming.

[@blasien1]

Looks pretty good to me. Probably could use a little more text, but if you're gonna err, err on the side of less is more. In any case it's not for me.

[@jacobkohler]

FYI - The curved text between the center and 6 six o'clock on Tudors indicate a non-in-house ETA movement.

[@carlvoxvires]

Late to this video but thought Id comment. Ive owned the 39mm Ranger for about a year and recently picked up a 40mm Explorer 1. Love them both, but the Ranger just wears better on my 6 and ³/⁴ inch wrist. Its perfect. It feels like a cross between an old Explorer and a Panerai dial, and I dont mind getting it dirty. Great watch.

[@zulu6ix290]

My seiko 5 snk131 survived a second floor drop on to rocks. I made a video about it. Currently making a video about water testing west I jumped off a train bridge into water. Spoiler it’s still working

[@RichardPalmbergDDS]

“Why it will fail: It’s got a brushed case and doesn’t look enough like a Rolex.” Lol k

[@momiland7673]

You haven't to compare this watch with the rolex explorer! you have to compare it with other watches with the same quality / price, on the market! There are? Best regards from Italy

[@samladuca1071]

They literally already make the perfect face for the Ranger just in a different color. All they needed to do was put the face from the BB58 bronze in clean black and white. (Preferably snowflake hands because that is tudors identity now, but the shovel hand is still ok I guess)

[@AndyAdventuring]

This is a very weird take considering the Sinn 556 -- which is strikingly similar to the new Ranger (matte black dial, painted indices, practically no other text, everything brushed) with a significantly inferior movement and bracelet -- is wiiiiiiiildly popular. "This watch is going to fail because it's not my style" is just a bizarre take for someone familiar with watches.

[@watchchimp3102]

Well, I think you've misjudged. First, you say the BB is good, but this isn't? They're essentially the same watch with a different dial, brushing and no ratcheting bezel! Additionally, I feel the previous version of the Ranger was too large for many people and the rather stark design makes it look bigger still, by dropping the size to 39mm and changing the dial size they effectively make the watch appear smaller and increase it's appeal to a broader audience. Will, it ever challenge the Black Bay? No, but I don't think Tudor expect it to.

[@MrSysadmin1975]

Haha, thanks for the video named like this. Maybe I'll get one Ranger for myself, finally - currently it is a "mission impossible" to find one in shop, without being subscribed to "Waiting list". Even buying Moonswatch was easier than that :)

[@Augustus_Imperator]

please, the Ranger is the most successful Tudor since the Black Bay Chrono

[@hlee2]

I’d very much prefer a brushed look. Why would anyone want a high polished tool watch? I don’t get it but you do you I guess

[@Joe-xo3xy]

I am not sure why they decided to make it all brushed? Because enthusiasts keep complaining when an all polished watch does not feature any brushing. However, I think the brushing has been over done. Thanks for the video

[@cursedrake]

Loved your accountant joke haha, you basically described me and many others in this hobby. It's interesting that you prefer the BB36 over the 58. I like both, but after owning a 58, I can't help but look at the 36 and think it's the same thing but the bezel just fell off or something. I can't think of another watch line where the dial is the same layout, just one model has a dive bezel, and one does not. The explorer definitely seems like a more well rounded watch, although I agree with you about the exterior bezel. Anyway great video as always!

[@phildupuis1084]

While i don't feel as strongly as you do about the misfires of the Ranger, I've got to say your solo videos are always great. Hope things work out for you with the Explorer.

[@Paul_hughes]

Check out his other channel, the iron snail, it’s really great and really funny

[@carlperdue1990]

I would like to see a rendering of the ranger with the applied numerals and indices from the northflag. Add a 3, 9, and go ahead and bring the minute hand also. Keep the shovel hour but lume all white. I think I would have bought that.

[@marktroddyn3351]

I have the Heritage Ranger and I think it has character. The new Ranger seems to have an overall bland appearance, but I think it needs to be seen in person for final judgement.

[@JulsSization]

I actually quite like it.

[@jpb9481]

Judging by how much he spends on jeans id assume thats a real gursky behind him

[@amangrayfilms1538]

Tudor Ranger looks good. Tudors are well made watches. Brush finishing also means that it'll have less scratches than the Rolex bracelets with polished finishing. I think Tudor Ranger is a perfect first watch for watch enthusiasts that want to where an expensive watch all day.

[@OhDearBabajan]

Brilliantly said. And I think the grained matte dial and the luminous print together is lovely. It really is esthetically pleasing, built like a tank, with an exceptional movement that has a fair amount of shock resistance. I figured it out… the ranger is literally a tank of a watch (not to mention the expertly polished steel case and bracelet) that you can dress up as well.

[@OneManReviews]

36mm Ranger would be a nearly perfect field watch from the brand.

[@thecatlinux]

Let’s talk about the ranger , but end up talking about he explorer , have you even seen the watch in the flesh .? In my opinion Tudor have made a great field watch , no fuss just for telling the time , perfect for the people who can see behind the coronet

[@alexchu8434]

Sick Gursky poster in the background! Been on the lookout for one from his stock exchange series....

[@iainsutherland1113]

Here’s a crazy idea watch fans - stop comparing Rolex to Tudor !!! Just because they are linked doesn’t mean you HAVE to compare them all the time. For me personally, anyone paying £8/9k (that’s after market prices driven up by after market sellers like T&H) for a field watch has lost their mind. The fact you’d have an issue that your field watch doesn’t have shiny bits makes me think you don’t want a field watch in the first place ! Owning a 39mm Exp I’d def buy this Tudor however it’s more comparable to my Sinn 556 or even my mechanical Hamilton Khaki Field than it is to a flashy Rolex. I can guarantee you this - it won’t ‘fail’ !

[@jeremydahm2124]

I hear you but personally I like the Panarai like effect the numeral layout gives. This coupled with fully brushed treatment, I'm digging the vintage tool watch vibes. Let's call it a shovel and sword handset? Wearing a 214270, I agree, the bezel should have be scaled like on the 36mm. The dial I prefer on the 39 all day. Love all that matt black....... Good talk. Cheers.

[@joelmoore3804]

I'm not convinced the lack of text is the problem with the ranger. You're right though that there is nothing to catch your eye on the ranger. I think IWC Spitfire does this well with "boring" design. I think Tudor should have studied IWC.

[@coffeeboyclips1973]

Imo iwc make the best looking watches, the designs are simple but iwc can make them look stunning.

[@philiplauzon1743]

Let’s just agree that the Ranger is a military grade under the radar watch. I want one for everyday beater and travel watch. I love the Ranger 😎🇨🇦 I enjoy the empty space on the mat dial, the brushed finished instead of mirror like the BB. Looks clean without any additional text. I will wear mine in Steel and Nato, can’t wait. I also own a Pelagos blue that I absolutely adore

[@JonathanMartinez-gs7pr]

Agreed. I don't see this as a competitor to the explorer. It's defenitely a field watch, meant to take the hits.

[@lonewolfemcquade8133]

My buddy just lost two lume pips on his Pelagos bezel just by swimming lightly in one shot. He's definitely not happy with Tudor right now

[@philiplauzon1743]

@@lonewolfemcquade8133 I think you just cursed me. I just starting having problems with my bezel zero triangle marker jamming at 12 o’clock :( Off to service next week. At least I’m under warranty 😕