Mughal Torture Story - How A Father Destroyed His Son's Life Out Of Jealousy

[@TheRanveerShowClips]

Check out my Meditation app: Level SuperMind Get Android - bit.ly/AndroidApp_Link Get iOS - apple.co/3SyiPcE Know more about Level : bit.ly/levellinktree

[@balwinderkaur2061]

Jahangir is the same person who tortured and martyred 5 th sikh guru arjan Dev g and Chandu played an equal role

[@theefficientfrontier]

Yeah but some peacefuls in the comment would like some proof of this as well

[@Dreamcatcher0007]

Ya lekin aajkal Sardar mullo aur Christians ko zyada pyaar karte. Yaad bhi nahi inko ke ye humare bade bhai hi hain har ghar ka bada bhai Sikh bana tha aur kitna torture Kiya tha sab guruo ko mullo aur Christians ko. Jo ye yaad ni rakhte wo kaha ke Sikh.

[@frienddhruv4u]

And now some of the Sikhs are working with support of the Islamic groups to fight against there own people (Hindus ) ,forgetting that the Sikh gurus give up there own lives and sacrificed so much to keep india safe from the venom of islamists

[@goldenhawk9972]

Muslim don't even like jahangir. Muslim love babur, arungzab and shah bahader.

[@goldenhawk9972]

@Burgiana Tamir was a person with the most self respect. He was pure Muslim and brave warrior and he defiene the word brave. He belive in win or die in the war.

[@shravyaamin8346]

Even the serial Jodha Akbar glorifies the king and in a subtle way demeans maharana pratap by showing akbar is righteous and all.....

[@bellatordei3440]

So?

[@lissyjohn7619]

shravya akbar was probalbly the most tolerant of all those muslim kings .

[@natureandworld2875]

becoz hindus were ignorant lot and believed congress which inturn connived with the education minister maulanas to bring to books only glorifying the muslim rulers

[@rhs2881]

@@lissyjohn7619 Like most tolerant as in, *Sheeshganj* in Delhi where he piled heads of fallen soldiers, ref-- He *beheaded* an unconscious *Commander Vikramaditya Hemu Chandra* out of revenge for losing the previous battle, then went on to kill EVERY soldier under his command (against laws of battle) displayed headless bodies in Delhi as a lesson.

[@rhs2881]

@@lissyjohn7619 or may be tolerant as in only killed *30000 hindu peasant families* (civilians) out of revenge in the battle of *Chittodgadh* where women of Chittod did *Juahar* , because he wanted to marry the daughter of Chittodgadh's King.

[@jeetendrain]

Absolute facts of Mughal family. Most of the daughters from Mughal family remained unmarried for lifetime, the reason behind it was they don't want son-in-laws also in power struggle along with sons, brothers and nephews.

[@Ranger-ly5qf]

Lol the Rajputs were no Saints either. Everyone was the same maybe to different extents.

[@tanmaysingh2005]

@@Ranger-ly5qf why are you so afraid of rajput

[@Vajrapani108]

The actual reason was different tho, the sultans liked to boink their own daughters. Shah Jahan and Aurangzeb did it undeniably

[@Ranger-ly5qf]

@@tanmaysingh2005 I’m just telling the Truth. And there is nothing to be afraid about rajputs 😂

[@tanmaysingh2005]

@@Ranger-ly5qf no comparison with Mughals and rajputs.

[@payelmandal6733]

So true, how can people sing glory to these people.but in history books of India they are mahatmas

[@abi-wg4jt]

Specially the liberal + pseudo secular gand

[@priyanshuraj4654]

Ashok also killed 99 cousins and one own brother for the throne any comments on that??or u are a hypocrite!!!

[@prateekshome]

Which history books did u read? No where in our ICSE books have the glorified mughals... They just stated what it was Now for further detailed information into the subject I suppose one has to be a History major in college.. That info which was given to students doing Masters in History will not be available to class 9-10 students It's the same for Biology and Medical Science

[@dj-ux1jr]

@@prateekshome no they indeed glorified them, see movies and in books also it is discussed iska beta falana dhimkaana and they were great kings 4-5 years ago i believed they were great..

[@prateekshome]

@@dj-ux1jr the education board doesn't make movies And movies are made to earn money... So of course they will show what pleasures the eye And there is no point in disregarding that they were emperors... Similarly there were plenty of Hindu kings and dynasties too I read about Guptas and Mauryas...that too in adequate detail of a class 8 student Maybe u didnt

[@vaniganapathi830]

The moment you touched on this part of History, words like BJP, RSS, propaganda are coming in the comment section.

[@ayushdhingra855]

Correct......

[@nandinirathore6697]

Tum apne nakli khayalo me khush raho​@kjknvbnnn

[@rushabhyeshwante]

There's saying for Mughals " Takht ya Taabut" meaning " Throne or Grave"

[@parameahwarbt4920]

Yes. "Sword was arbitrar of throne" Even today you can see this in bangla, afgan pak and other fanatic countries! "Mughul culture" that is!

[@amarenderreddy5298]

I don’t have words for muslims who name their children after tyrant Jhahangir, Timur…😳

[@Ash-ir6oo]

Kareena is an arrogant illiterate with an overinflated ego. We should not be paying attention to such people.

[@himalaya_putr]

unless Hindus doesn't make such actors pay for their insolence nothing will change.

[@bellatordei3440]

Obviously before them these names existed, also people are not only bad or good, that's like to ask why there so many people naming their child's Adolf or Joseph

[@pallavisharma8309]

There are lakhs of people with same name and different personalities. Naming a child Abdul would not make him a scientist.

[@amarenderreddy5298]

@@pallavisharma8309 its the ideology behind naming their children after tyrants, not expecting their children to become them. These people’s sole motive is to spread their venomous thinking through idolising such dreadful personalities.

[@tnadduvay9592]

And these barbaric mughal stories were taught to us in our schools.

[@renusangwan7142]

Because like it or not its a part of energy

[@darkranger9475]

In NCERT; For mughals - Entire Chapter For Marathas - Single Topic

[@PiLaminar]

Because Mughal was empire and Maratha was a kingdom. ONly Guptas , Mauryan and Mughals were truly empire for over 200 years

[@darkranger9475]

@@PiLaminar so few paragraphs are enough for Study of Marathas..??

[@PiLaminar]

@@darkranger9475 If we start studying every ruler with details, you end up studying history throughout our life. Do you want your children just to study History? We are still in the middle bof third world War with left and Islam against us

[@Amaze300]

Maratha empire was most powerful anyways❤​@@PiLaminar

[@ayushdhingra855]

In class 7th icse there is a whole chapter for akbar and aurangzeb. After later mughal(mughal after aurangzeb) Next chapter named is east India Company. No mention of marathas empire and ahoms

[@sathe61]

Urduwood, Irfan and Romila great job for showing murderer's as peaceful in our books 📚 and Movies📽️

[@bellatordei3440]

Peaceful and murder can be the same thing

[@MW-lb2dz]

Chu**ya hai tu.. Rajputs, Mughals, Marathas, Har kisi ne Throne ke lalaj me khud ke, Bothers, relatives.. ko kill.. kya.

[@MW-lb2dz]

@@bellatordei3440 no it's not the same

[@bellatordei3440]

@@MW-lb2dz you kill rebels in order to preserve peace

[@parameahwarbt4920]

Sir this romill tapur irfan habib habibur rahaman are all fake historians and created false narrative thinking that truth can be suppressed ever. They are fully exposed for their falshood and lies fed to indian people since 70 years. Now they have proved how bogus they are? Are they mercenaries and farce historians!?

[@bills2843]

I'm forgetting the exact name but there was this one senior royal woman in the Mughal Empire who had objected to Khusrau being handed to Khurram (later Shah Jahan) as she knew that Shah Jahan would kill him. She said that it would start a procedure where Mughals would execute their entire families to become Emperor. If you look back before Jahangir, Humayun and Akbar had both faced rebellions from their brothers. But they both never executed their brothers, instead stripping them of their privileges and asking them to go for pilgrimage to Mecca. When Jahangir became Emperor, his two brothers Murad and Daniyal had already died. But Shah Jahan started killing his brothers and by 1628, he had killed all his brothers (Khusrau, Parvez, Shahryar). Shah Jahan then also executed Hoshang Mirza and Dawar Baksh, the sons of his uncles Murad and Daniyal. Later on these actions would come back to haunt Shah Jahan, when he would be deposed by his own son Aurangzeb. Aurangzeb killed Shah Jahan's favourite son, Dara Shukoh along with Shah Jahan's other sons. Aurangzeb also killed Dara's son Suleiman who Shah Jahan had considered the 7th Emperor.

[@asfarahmad1688]

It was nur jahan

[@Proud_Malayalee]

​@@asfarahmad1688no.. it was salim's mother....Noor Jehan is her daughter to law

[@PiLaminar]

@@Proud_Malayalee It was Jodha bai aka Harka Bai aka Marium Uzamani

[@sulaganabiswas]

Religion has nothing to do with violent kings. All kings and dictators are violent because they have absolute power

[@krishnapillai2595]

Ashoka was also very cruel who killed 2 lakh people in Kalinga (modern day Orissa). It is only after this that he had a change of heart and he adopted Buddhism. Pushyamitra Sunga, the last emperor of Mauryan dynasty, killed thousands of peaceful Buddhist monks of India and destroyed their monasteries. So cruelty is not confined to Muslim kings. Any king will become cruel if you get in his way.

[@juniortwo2202]

Pushyamitra was not a mauryan ruler , he became emperor by killing his own king thereby ending mauryan dynasty .Also getting your own son's eyes out and playing cheap tricks to win battles was very common in mughal rulers than Hindu rulers , which is a fact🙂

[@snufkin103]

Asoka did not have any change of heart. Asoka was a Buddhist way before Kalinga war. Asoka killed his own brother because he was a Jain monk. He killed his another brother and usurped the throne. So Asoka persecuted both Hindus and Jains. Also stop defending Mughals and Islamic rulers. Know that you are also defending slave trade done by them. Not all kings are cruel. Don't generalize just to defend your favourite Islamic rulers.

[@shashwatparth3672]

Yes Ashok was very cruel and remorseless and he was Buddhist before kalinga war, Pushyamitra sungha didn't persecute Budhhist the way he is portrayed, there's a podcast on vaad channel regarding that. The topic here is whether Mughals were the way mainstream media portrays them or they were very cruel. Comparing their cruelty to ancient indian kings is like comparing cycle with motorbikes. They were sadists.

[@ayushdhingra855]

She is not doing hindu vs muslim there. They were discussing about mughal empire Most of info in wikipedia like about khusro. shah jahan war of succesion.

[@nvnamratavyas782]

I think today we can sit and jugde everything.. but back in the day life was only this . The war to get the throne was everything.. ppl thinking and mind sets evolve with time... May be 1000 yearz later ppl will feel we were alzo so wrong .

[@ayeshaclassesgk]

Ranveer ji❤️ lv u beautifully well made love the way you represent

[@atrimondal4091]

These kinds of people intentionally try to disrespect the mughal period. Yes there are so many nasty incidents in this dynasty but the present day so called historians try to assert that the mughals being muslim were very cruel. But I respectfully wish this lady to remember the life of Great Ashoka. How many murders he did to gain crown? Just only because of someone's religion you cannot defame that person. If you want to depict the history properly please donot act like pseudo hindus of a particular political party.

[@harshpashte4871]

There is not even a single evidence of this incident 😂 he only has 3 brothers one of which who was favourite of bindusaar was killed because he was hated by the courtiers of mauryan empire and other 2 don't have much history but one of them was a saint or religious teacher if you don't know the history please shut your mouth 😂

[@khushbunimrani]

This is just awesome, the concept of short clips just amazing ❤

[@yogeshshinde406]

Fun fact: Jahangir (salim) had 50% of hindu rajput DNA in his blood. 😂

[@syedsaniyaahmed9995]

Great explaination 🔥

[@arindamdas395]

In Bengal posto or poppy seeds (obtained from opium ) is eaten as an item called Posto Vada i.e poppy seeds fritters from ancient times till date ,but now it's very rare as poppy seeds are quite expensive and it's very rare dishes one could find in a middle class bengalee families

[@tems4807]

My mom fed me one in the Siddheswari Pice Hotel, and that's very good

[@GalaxyImpact200]

Posto bata bolchis ki ??? Posto vada ki hoye

[@whybhavi]

Wait, are they by chance called khash khash ??

[@cyberwarrior3299]

If Jahangir can punish like that to his own son for being a Revolutionary, how could he have left the others who have helped him? Cruelty is in his blood, From Taimur to Genghis khan, From Babar to Akbar. & Call it anything but it's the thing which is essential to sustain 'The Empire'.

[@subhajitrouth5379]

Bro Kushrau Didn't liked jahangir and also wanted to kill him ... Jahangir had two sons Khurram and Kushrav if he was really wanted to take everything he would have killed sah jahan as well but why do you think he didn't do it??If your chind want to kill waht would you do in that situation??

[@kanthlk]

Babur had a lover boy - Baburi- who died is a battle- Babur was shattered and ordered demolition of Ram Mandir in Ayodhya and a masjid was built on top of it - hence Baburi masjid

[@historyfromarchivestolimel8662]

Prince Khusrau was the favourite choice of Akbar to succed him because he was capable, handsome and secular. He was a brave warrior and loved by the Indian masses due to his liberal views.

[@jagdishramanathan2091]

Dara shikoh was identical to khusro in mentality and character ,after all he was his nephew .in destiny also they were same .among Hindus there was an escape route .some princes became sanyassis to avoid being killed . History records that the magadhan royals were parricide during ajatashatru who killed his father bimbisar .there were 6or 8 generation of parricide before the people overthrew those parricide Dynasty and became a janpad ie republic till mahapadmanand the barber killed the old king .chanakya came one generation later to overthrow nandas .rest is recorded history .

[@shivanighosh999]

What a truth known through a good content on KZbin. History should be told as it is !!! But unfortunately in schools it wasn't!! Thanks for letting us know the real truth about some big Mughal emperor like akhbar 👍🏻

[@vinitapannu3211]

Somewhere down the line these terrorists preaching killing innocents in the name of jannat naseeb hone ka rasta have cruelty in their DNA.

[@gauriawasthi6162]

Finallyyyyy someone talking about it... Otherwise hmara Bollywood hi in logo ki glory gate h aur hmare religion and history ki baizzati krte h 😐

[@ShivaKumar-br4wk]

She was there's at that time ..... And time traveled to explain now...

[@protima3168]

Jo tune parha hai wo tujhe jahangir ney btaya kya?

[@SanjayThakur-ip4ds]

She educated unlike you people

[@fristondsouza5260]

He rebelled against his father took over Mughal territory And tried to overthrow his father, so he caught him and partially blinded him and imprisoned him.

[@yerikim5209]

It's either kill or get killed. At certain point for many it was not just greed for power, but the power for survival. Honestly I feel we cannot just blame one particular emperor for the cruelty, cruel was (or still is) the society (also can't overlook their lineage genetics). Romanticizing such stories are honestly laughable. Historical romance genre is no doubt appealing, but being irresponsible towards the public and the real history is utterly shameful and ridiculous.

[@ayushdhingra855]

This is very common among mughal. Main reason was greed for throne money and power generally see their kin as threat to the throne . They won't mind killing their sons brothers for power and money.they killed their kin in brutal way taking eyes off.... Even killing blinded kin.

[@tradingjunction5003]

Hard times requires hard mens... Everybody fought with each other then for the throne

[@k.999]

They didn't fight each other, they fought their own blood

[@06nilesh]

@@k.999 👍

[@shravyaamin8346]

The problem is not that they killed their own brothers for throne considering that time's point of view but today's people glorifying him as the great righteous and just ruler.......

[@k.999]

@@shravyaamin8346 He didn't only do injustices which were required to gain power but also injustices which were also useless and ruthless

[@shravyaamin8346]

@@k.999 💯💯

[@ColorTick]

According to her, all Hindu rulers were saints, while all Muslim rulers who ruled India for thousands of years were brutal invaders. What a logic based on his logic.

[@crushed4556]

Unfortunately there are still some hypocrite Indians who are proud on this cruel creature's action. There is a famous Bollywood couples who named their son after this cruel creature Jahangir and gave a statement that they named their son after a great ruler whom they are proud

[@Wiintb]

Peacefuls.

[@onso9898]

This happens when you read history first time , just read power struggle of every empire ,it is common thing in that era

[@Wiintb]

@@onso9898 I read my history where family, respect etc comes to mind. I learn my respect from Mariyada Purush like Ram who will walk away from everything to honour his father’s words. My history and my hero’s for me. Yours. You choose. How is Porkistan?

[@hidum5779]

@@onso9898 sorry Didn't happen in the reign of Shivaji Maharaj.

[@zeeshanhaider1303]

That's mythology. And even he didn't trust sita.. Asked her to take a loyalty test. And he killed Shudra Ascetic Shambuka just because he was attempting to perform tapas.

[@neha-gt6ke]

@@zeeshanhaider1303 who are you to say it was mythology. How dare you?. And do you think momad said all truth.. do you think allah really talked woth him or he had schizophrenia

[@Ash-ir6oo]

It’s Mughal history that should be eradicated from our history books. They keep praising and idolising these barbarians. They are in fact shameful part of our history.

[@javahardumb4655]

Very correct. Very good

[@neerubistamagar6917]

Like Hindu Samrat Ashoka killed his own brothers brutally.

[@subhamoysengupta2763]

Please make a podcast regarding the life of Kunwar Durjan Singh ...pls

[@realvidur]

For a reason people are happy for Bollywood downfall 🗿 0:01

[@sumanthsnandish1712]

They treat their own brother's like this,then how would they have treated normal citizens

[@harshtwitt1879]

Real truth of peaceful community.

[@whybhavi]

The way she's explaining like she has seen everything that happened is just awesome, cause it feels wayy more interesting to listen to her !!

[@daddy2694]

"Religion of Peace" What an irony 🤣😂🤣😂

[@anjala8980]

Too much for those naive side profile portraits holding rose😂😂💀

[@sreyamagan8070]

😂😂😭

[@sunayoza]

people judging medieval era kings by today's morality. please try to understand those kings were illiterate and did every possible thing to make sure that they remain as a king. that's it.

[@ayushdhingra855]

Most of them were literate.... They know how to write and read..... Very versed in language mathematics even some in science. Education do exist before britishers

[@snaf7249]

Khosru was blinded after revolt against his father.

[@janmejoydeblaskar8511]

Wanderful information 👍👍

[@aishwaryasDiaries]

These are medieval rulers with things expected from them. They are glorified not for what they did personally but the battles they fought the extent of the empire the wealth they created the architecture they made the stability in politics they brought. They were such strong empire even distant middle east and europeans were scared of them. The british were so amazed that they borrowed the word mogul into their dictionary to explain anything huge. Political infighting, killing relatives for power, religious intolerance, multiple wives and not giving respect to women those days were so common. Pushyamitra sangha, dhana nanda, chandragupta maurya, ashoka, bimbisara, ajathshatru, raghoji bhonsle, tarabai(who disguised her son for power), mihirakaula all are in this category. Hindu s desecrating buddhist temples or muslims breaking hindu temples os all we talk about but what about pallava ruler narasimhavarman sacking chalukya temples, the chandella s looting pratihara temples. It is the tyrion lannister s words “ things are expected of them”. They were medieval rulers displaying power looting wealth for themselves not independent democratic international boundary respect worthy civilized working salaried professionals in the internet judging humanity and violence over power in history

[@TheStoicsChannel]

To be huge and to be righteous is a different thing. There may be incidences of wars in all cultures but there has been no incidences of family-in-fighting. Also, if they should be glorified for their architecture, they should also show the family fighting and also, the battles and what they took. You say mediaeval rulers, look at all islamic countries and check how they get succeeded. It is their religion not the period of time.

[@aishwaryasDiaries]

@@TheStoicsChannel i wrote those names for a reason . No incidences of family infighting? Please google each of them. All are examples of family infighting and religious persecution and cruelty too… not warfare. Since you apoke of culture il add another name. Kauravas and Pandavas. Also know about Soyabai and Rajaram and the succession story after shivaji s death. And shah jahan, Aurangzeb and khilji succession stories are popular not just in history books but also in folklore and drammas. Else medha wouldnt know it either. I am sorry if you werent aware of it. But so are the horrific succession stories of bimbisara and ashoka . All kings did this. In History theres a popular saying- either eat or get eaten. It holds true for Alexander to Napoleon to Vikramaditya to muhhals and khiljis and everyone. And i didnt understand islamic countries successful? Successful in what? How is that related to moghuls?

[@pigeonlover935]

@@aishwaryasDiaries chatrapati shivaji maharaj had two sons , none of them pocked each other's eyes out , never happened in entire lineage of maratha rulers , you are making a false equivalence. You should get your knowledge crosschecked from different sources .

[@aishwaryasDiaries]

@@pigeonlover935 no they never pop out each others eyes but war of succession did break out between his successors. Family infighting was the point not popping out eyes. And the Marathas at Shivaji s time were just establishing the empire werent that rich like Mughals with harem full of kids and too many successors. 2 sons and even they wanted control. Infighting is natural whenever there is power struggle. Infact sambhaji had defected to the mughals while shivaji was alive only to return unrepentant. There are stories of Soyabai trying to put Rajaram on throne by poisoning him. Sambhaji took control of Raigad fort and imprisoned Rajaram, his wife and Soyabai and killed the commander to become a king. Sambhaji even went ahead to execute his step mom Soyabai. Its ok to rever a figure and worship but its not okay to remove a part of the history to prove the pedestal your putting them in. Infact after so many points I had put, so many names I took you had to bring “popping out eyes in Maratha empire” which I never said.

[@vanillajoy2106]

@@aishwaryasDiariesWell among hindu kings, there was a rule that the eldest son should succeed the father as king, 2nd, 3rd sons were given royal titles & made satraps of small kingdoms.All other relatives were also given royal titles and authority. So succession was mostly peaceful, cooperative, harmonious and mostly celebratory, there used to be week long celebrations when the crown prince was made king. But there was no such rule among muslim rulers, Like the lady in the vdo said, it was free for all, hence the succession was always brutal and gruesome and heartwrenching.

[@iwatchDVDsonXbox360]

Not going to lie... i kind of want to see love bollywood film on Hitler...

[@NerdyNerve]

Wow totally amazed with all the facts

[@AM-zk6ue]

If you are "Amazed" by these facts then surely you were sicular hindu before this.

[@NerdyNerve]

@@AM-zk6ue nah bro I am still secular but I wasn't secular on cost of my religion I respect their religion as much as they respect ours. I love their festivals as much they love ours.

[@k.999]

@@NerdyNerve They don't. Anyways, for Akbar, search for Rahul Arya on Akbar

[@piyush2791]

Do a podcast on caste system

[@manashpratimdeka4470]

It’s so similar to what the Ottomans did!

[@investorEngineer]

Be proud of culture where family and neighbour is respected and can co exist.

[@MeAshishYadav]

We read the glory of mughal empire only in the name of Akbar not in the name of other mughal kings because all others are only follow cruelty to rule.

[@shivakumarparthasarathy4444]

Please request speakers to quote the source of their historic recollection. Would like to know the difference between story and fact

[@anulagnabasu9854]

Actually, if you see this thing from Jahangir's point of view, this thing will seem different and even emotional. When Jahangir writes about Khusrau Mirza's escape, he says that Khusrau Mirza was distracted and preoccupied and didn't have belief in his father's affection. He also says that he should have shown the prince more affection so that not even a hair extent of doubt remained in his mind. Also, a few days after Khusrau Mirza was captured, Jahangir went to visit the Shah ara garden in Kabul along with his court and family. He ordered the chains to be taken off Khusrau's feet so that he could walk in that garden. Jahangir writes that his fatherly affection didn't allow him to exclude his son from walking in that garden. In 1619, Jahangir was probably in Vrindavan or Mathura if I am not wrong. During this time he writes that the dust from the brows of his son was washed with the pure water of forgiveness.

[@DanemDar]

Can you please tell me from where did you collected this information i would like to read please

[@dididi4751]

I agree that their way living is violent but this was the way of the world that time. It's survival of the fittest. I don't think it's just to judge yesterday's actions with today's lenses.

[@shravyaamin8346]

But they we should also not glorify such actions right ....... Seeing women as worse than second class citizens was the norm back then would you still justify it.... Who says that it was normal back then or not,who judges it....

[@tejas6323]

That was the way of life in entire world except India...Killing brothers for throne...putting parents into prison...looting villages, raping women these things were common in entire world...Indian kings never lived liked that...there may be few exception...but majority of indian kings had very high moral standards.

[@Akshay-ru1ln]

Oh didi

[@ajinkyapande4720]

Is she a school teacher?

[@MsRkshukla]

Not just jealously but out of shame,Khoosro was perhaps biological son of akbar

[@deanfernandes484]

36 people Shah Jahan killed or Aurangzeb?

[@muhibbakhshi6907]

Shah jahan killed all the 36 people who could claim the throne in which his brothers his cousins and all those people came who could claim the throne

[@rahulwanderlust91]

Truly great content

[@anubhav7547]

Maharana Pratap = Father of Akbar 🤴❤️🙏

[@adityavv96]

Sambhaji maharaj was tortured by Aurangzeb too !

[@zazeeataleeq4877]

You know Hindu rajputs fought for mughals all the way when Akbar married Rajput girls.This is history

[@عليياسر-ف4ن9ك]

Aren't these just mercenaries who destroyed Indian temples?

[@being_aspirang]

this anchor every time when i look at him when he listen to the guest, everytime he look confused, doubt and must be thinking his guest don't what they are speaking non-sense totally blank...

[@ravinderrawat6846]

Khusro revolted against his father jehangir and on 6 April 1606 he left Agra for Lahore to defeat Lahore governor dilawar khan . Then jehangir marched against his son defeat him and handover him to khurram (later Shah jahan) where khurram ordered his mens to blind hum

[@Inspirewheel]

This is false illustration..Jahangir didn't pluck out Khusrau's eyes...He was killed in 1622 by his Brother Mirza Khurram(later called as Shahjahan)...in the race of becoming next emperor. Though is was true that Salim(Jahangir) didn't liked his elder son Mirza Khusrau...but he himself didn't killed him.

[@hassankhan5722]

Akbar sent Bairam Khan on a long pilgrimage

[@swapniltat198]

Part 2 kadhi yenar aahe ranveer bhau..??

[@anuragc1565]

That s exactly what you call as a shoddy biased and prejudiced opinion

[@sunitait8671]

And they say King Ashoka chandal.

[@gaurav9134]

This proves the bad association of salim.....even though salim was son of harakha bai a hindu rajput princess.....she might have given him good teachings n sanskar but bad association can build this type of evil in the society

[@RDd188]

Uptill very recently, most painted all roses & sunshine kind of pictures of Mughals, when everyone knows they didn't came here for a Picnic just like the British. Today's generation like us need to be aware of this fact because sooner we have to again face such issue once Muslim population get's to a critical tipping point.

[@rekhaghosh3656]

WhatsApp graduate😂😂😂😂

[@rekhaghosh3656]

Ja ke job dhund pahele.

[@Manikarnika1234]

cruelty k karan raaj kr rhe the bs .....

[@The_Positive_Peach_SA]

Akbar also had one brother named Mirja Hakim

[@tatyabancho6577]

Some community glorifying them 🙂

[@Curiousguy93-l4z]

Not some...only one 🐷 community who loves mughals

[@bha-ka-kitchen]

He is not kusro...his name is dara shikoh...this lady dosnt know anything

[@aprajitatiwari3848]

Salim became jahangir ?

[@mohdrehanrehan581]

Salim good name is jahangir.

[@muhammedzubair9631]

Unfortunately mindset was to make an example, who ever tried to become a king will have to show power otherwise he will become a lesson. This you can see in Roman Empire, Ottoman Empire and even in Indus Valley kingdoms. In order to get respect, kings will show ruthless attitude. Look what British did to Bahadur Shah Zafar.

[@gangster_official8327]

But u didnt see the level of cruality !

[@asfandyar8411]

Even Ashoka torturedand killed his brothers does that make him a bad guy? Obv not, Power just doesn’t come to anyone, you have to work for it and have strong will, if we use this logic every ruler in history with significant power and influence is a barbaric human being, Alexander’s military campaign killed millions of people, this doesn’t make him any less great

[@umeshyesh]

Forward this to Burkha Duth

[@jaganat3333]

can we also abt the treachery of non mughals also

[@jokerunbelievable6141]

Taqht or Taboot

[@Supermanindia98]

No one cares about England and bringing back our fortune kohinoor ... But Sab log mara huva insaan ki upar apnae fame dundrahae ha. Also happy in reading those books ...

[@sumanthsnandish1712]

It's like tiger shark baby eats it's sibling in mother womb for survival

[@sidrakhan6835]

In ancient times In middle ages Violence is common

[@amangrover6576]

A correction need to be made here as it’s not a violence, it’s inhumanity at its peak and was extreme barbaric.

[@shaikadnanali4375]

nice conspiracy but not 400 years realty

[@renusangwan7142]

She has a very nervous lieing body language

[@adnanqudsi9604]

she cant even take the name properly😂😂😂

[@afrinmukadam4818]

Why is Ranveer not making videos about other rulers ? Is there a hidden agenda ?

[@sowmitriswamy6718]

Everything doesnt need a hidden agenda. Who is doing the hiding anyway for what purpose? Think of other possibilities - no one offered him a role in such a film, somebody did talk about it but could not arrange financing, he was too busy shooting other films and could not agree to certain dates, he did not want to act with a specific costar, etc.

[@Akshay-ru1ln]

telling real history has become propaganda now 😂👍

[@Pusk23]

Says a converted marathi muslim..

[@82srijasingh19]

Dukhti rag pr hath

[@surajvishwakarma2223]

Because humne ncert main sabse jyada muglo ke baree main hi padha h ncert main sabse jyada muglo ke baree main tha to is there a hidden agenda 🤔

[@rk-od4kd]

why are history books only about mughals now? literally 4-5 chapters that are about kings of hinduism ig in the whole school life. that was not so in the now parent generation's school life. who is responsible for these changes and why is a secular state not giving enough knowledge from all perspectives to their kids is the real question. its not even just mughals. british consists such a major chunk again. europe and other contries have a portion. history is supposed to teach our own mistakes. our own past. not invaders.

[@kanchisharma130]

So called intellectuals and their fantasies.. Not a Mughal supporter but speak facts atleast factually..

[@shruyanshumishra3481]

History is like this only, one who remains in power will always dominate ruthlessly, be it Mughals, Ashok, Romanians or any other kingdom. In old times there was nothing like morals or human values, domination was the only way to rule... Gradually everybody got civilized. This is civilization. In history one who enjoyed power did same by blood bath as it's the only way to remain in power those times. Now a days, People, politicians and historians take their liberty to highlight and emphasize their version of history to impress selected audiences for their favours. Its not a liberal thought it's just the way we learned from history and got civilized. Back in times there were no human rights or peace making forces so it was all of power and dominance.

[@LuckyBombay]

One more achievements of the Mughals … they gave a lot of content to Ranveer… anyways some stuff that this lady does not know and our boy did not bother to check.. It was Khurram who killed khusrau and not jehangir as part of war of succession… this is important as this lady tries to portray jehangir as so barbaric that he killed his son… not a saint but certainly not a son killer … Also people should note that after Akbar most Mughals had more than 50% rajput blood … so should we start portraying rajputs as barbaric ? … the tone and tenor of these discussions is us vs them and we are so good but they are barbaric … obviously they are long dead but that doesn’t stop people from viewing this as a dog whistle to portray today’s Muslims as barbaric just by religious association with some barbaric horde long dead … such discussions are as toxic as the religious debates on Godi media … but our dumb interviewer is getting his views so who cares

[@protima3168]

And swara Bhaskar to brag

[@mudassirbaig21]

I think this podcast is biased !

[@surabhivardam8455]

I want to be on your show..

[@RP-jf6qc]

Become extreme rightist or leftist you'll be invited But don't be neutral cause you would not have chance😂😂😂

[@mr.boblegram9679]

The time was different, they need3d to be that way to survive period.

[@protima3168]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@shashwatparth3672]

So they cannot survive by bedeading, they had to gorge eyes out, leave snakes, use poshto-oppium..... then you will survive.

[@ayushdhingra855]

They don't have any ethics..... All hungry for power.... They killed their famiily. No rule and regulation.

[@Subzerowins]

This is true she was there

[@unicornsaanvi]

Amazing

[@garimayadav483]

Wrongly perceived ...that time everyone wanted to rule .be it any one ..why only jahangir if you read about mauryan you find it same ..ashoka killed many to win kalinga ..and also he killed his brother to get the throne. .king was one who defeated all opponent . Comparing it with today is bull shit

[@kaustubhraizada]

not his son