Was Akbar Really Great? Or Is It Just Propaganda? | Keerthi History

[@mentalgymnast69]

Our history books have been written by people suffering from stockholm syndrome.

[@Keerthihistory]

Damn!!! I’m gonna pin this😅

[@ajraol9032]

Their conscience is mortgaged to The West

[@JaiSriRam119]

*Billions Salutations to Keerthi For spreading Reality of Akbar* *He is not Akbar the Great, He is Akbar the Adharma😡😡*

[@JaiSriRam119]

*Millions of salutations to our Hindu Warrior Veerangana Keerthi ji🚩* , who raised the flag of Hindu🚩 with the Power of her Bhakti in the Crowd of Billions. She is working 24/7 so hard to awaken, Enlighten, Open the Eyes, Tell the Truth, Facts, Reality to Siklar Sleeping Hindus🚩 *Jai Hindutva🚩Jai Hindu Rashtra 🚩Jai Jai Sri Ram🕉️🚩🚩*

[@JaiSriRam119]

​​@@KeerthihistoryWe Hindus Love alot Keerthi🙏U r the Gem of our Hindu Community U r true follower of Dharma, Satya🚩 Bhagwan bless you alot and give you more Strength🙏🕉️ Jai Sri Ram Hari Hara🙏🕉️

[@KamatShivani]

Worst part is we are taught more about Babur’s lineage in our history books, than we are taught about Mauryas or Bhosales... and that is scary... I keep recommending your videos to my friends with school-going kids... hopefully it’ll help teach them OUR real history better

[@anulagnabasu9854]

I am from ICSE board and we had two big chapters about the Mauryas in our book.

[@KamatShivani]

@@anulagnabasu9854 I’m glad to hear it... I passed in 2001 from SSC board, and all we had was two paragraphs about Shivaji Maharaj in our history books... which by the way covered everything Mughal thoroughly

[@sugunbtwj]

​@@KamatShivanishivaji is a king. Mughals is a dynasty lasted for centuries. How many pages we can write for his 15 years rule.

[@sugunbtwj]

​@@KamatShivanithuglaks, kilgis, mughals.... Is a 1200 years history. How many centuries did shivaji kingdom lasted?

[@indianpoliticalvideo7430]

​@@sugunbtwjdude cholas rules for 1000 years, ahom ruled for 800 plus years, vijayanagar Empire was there for almost 1000 years.. how many lineages u know? We all taught of lineage of so called great Mughals for babar to Aurangabad but doesn't even know 2-3lineage of one Empire... Don't be so blind to argue that the invdrs were not glorified in our history books🤦🤦🤦

[@1nchara]

hello...I'm a student studying in 8th grade. When I was writing my final exam for social, we had a question "Why is Akbar called Akbar the great? Justify your statment". What I was expected to quite is exactly what was given in our classwork or textbook. But instead, I gave an answer very similar to what you have said in this video. For saying that he is not worthy of that title, I didn't get marks for that particular question. I asked my teacher why, and she scoled me. Unforyunately this is the reality of our present day schools.

[@Amitironflex]

u did a great job well done👍

[@Keerthihistory]

I’m sorry you had to go through that! But education institutions are like that. They have a standard answer… unfortunately we gotta write what they want us to write to get marks.

[@JaiSriRam119]

Hats off to you🔥🕉️🚩🚩 U r True Hindu,True Follower of Hindu Dharma🕉️🚩 Bhagwan will send people like you only to svargaloka🙏The Ones who always stand with Dharma, Truth🕉️ Bhagwan bless you alot🙏Jai Sri Ram Hari Hara🙏🕉️

[@prabhukumarful]

You are the best

[@JaiSriRam119]

*Justice for 1990 Hindus in Kashmir, 2002 Sabarmati, 2003 Nandimarg, Girija Tickoo, Nikita Tomar, Kanhaiyalal, Harsha etc😭😭* And Iam talking about things that this Community did in a "Hindu-Majority country" *In countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Iran etc the number is in Millions😭😭* This is Proof for "All Religions are not equal"

[@JaiSriRam801]

Your Channel Enriched me a lot. Till now only Northern India was raising their voice for our Hindu Dharma. Now Southern part of India is also raising it's voice through Hindus like you. Much respect from Karnataka,Jai Sri Ram

[@manjunaik4320]

Being kannadiga, I think people of Bollywood are son of bitches to glorify the mughuls. I truly respect rajputs valor and bravery and I also urge every Indian to become yoddha to protect our sanatan dharm and culture..Jai hind Jai Shri Ram, Jai Hanuman 🙏🙏

[@angryjedi8563]

@1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. @1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. This is common, as widow remarriage is encouraged in their culture, that is, how men having 4 wives came into picture, because there were too many widdows at that time. But today's many misguided muslims take advantage of this. @2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. @3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. @3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulamas that Akbar later on removed. @3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed @4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. @5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. @7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

[@OmkarNaik-x2f]

Hey you as*hole India is country of hindus and Akbar was one of the dirtiest muslim king

[@suresh_jaganathrao]

We know invaders story more than our own emperor.... This is the saddest thing about our knowledge... People like you are informing us with our real "the real" HISTORY... Respect for you Keerthi ❤❤

[@Keerthihistory]

😇❤️🙏🏼

[@JaiSriRam119]

*Justice for 1990 Hindus in Kashmir, 2002 Sabarmati, 2003 Nandimarg, Girija Tickoo, Nikita Tomar, Kanhaiyalal, Harsha etc😭😭* And Iam talking about things that this Community did in a "Hindu-Majority country" *In countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Iran etc the number is in Millions😭😭* This is Proof for "All Religions are not equal"

[@JaiSriRam119]

Islam = Adharma Proof :- quran chapter 9 verse 123, chapter 8 verse 55

[@JaiSriRam119]

*We all Hindus should take a moment to Honour our ancestors who even in extreme situations didn't convert to this Adharma spreaders and stayed true to their Hindu identity🙏🕉️*

[@LionsHeart3.1.3]

Benefit of jizya(protection tax) : 1. Jizya payers won't be forced to participate in war or be needed to join the war. 2. He can live with his family peacefully in the land. 3. Muslim's will establish his and his families right to practice own religion. 4. Muslims will protect his property. 5. No need to pay zakat tax that is paid by muslims as charity.(Zakat can be > Jizya) 6. Muslims will protect jizya payers, with even own life on the line durning war. 7. He can follow laws of own religion unless it's extrimism. [ like burning wife alive with dead husband . or burying of daughter alive. etc.] 8. Woman, children, old man and woman, poor man and woman. Don't need to pay jizya and can live without paying it. 9. Kafirs who accepted to pay jizya without war, their temples/mandirs /churches etc. will be under muslim protection. 10. No need to pay defense tax that is paid by muslims. And more and more

[@user-ej5sf6fc4x]

We learnt wrong history in schools. At least for this generation kids history needs to be corrected in each state books. Thanks a lot for your dedication and hard work for a better tomorrow, for a better India. Jai Hind

[@rmrrao2675]

Fake history made up by Nehru and his Taliban education minister Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad!

[@JaiSriRam119]

*Billions Salutations to Keerthi For spreading Reality of Akbar* *He is not Akbar the Great, He is Akbar the Adharma😡😡*

[@JaiSriRam119]

*Justice for 1990 Hindus in Kashmir, 2002 Sabarmati, 2003 Nandimarg, Girija Tickoo, Nikita Tomar, Kanhaiyalal, Harsha etc😭😭* And Iam talking about things that this Community did in a "Hindu-Majority country" *In countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Iran etc the number is in Millions😭😭* This is Proof for "All Religions are not equal"

[@JaiSriRam119]

Islam = Adharma Proof :- quran chapter 9 verse 123, chapter 8 verse 55

[@JaiSriRam119]

*We all Hindus should take a moment to Honour our ancestors who even in extreme situations didn't convert to this Adharma spreaders and stayed true to their Hindu identity🙏🕉️*

[@purvashots]

He doesn't deserve to be great.. But he is definitely the best out of the worst..🙌🏻 True lines Mam..It just hits hard🤞🏻❤

[@omsachdev]

I would say he is one of the decent one out of the worst. Akbar and best are not appropriate in the same sentence

[@omsachdev]

@@ardashirshah7786 do you really think that sati and massacre are the same thing or of equal magnitude? Slavery is prevalent even today in one form or another

[@badship]

​@@omsachdevyes i think both are same.

[@RedRebel008]

@@omsachdev1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

[@akshaylenin7166]

The Supreme Personality of Godhead is Lord Vishnu

[@BengaliManfromWB]

I am from West Bengal. I love the way you present the true history to us.

[@LionsHeart3.1.3]

Benefit of jizya(protection tax) : 1. Jizya payers won't be forced to participate in war or be needed to join the war. 2. He can live with his family peacefully in the land. 3. Muslim's will establish his and his families right to practice own religion. 4. Muslims will protect his property. 5. No need to pay zakat tax that is paid by muslims as charity.(Zakat can be > Jizya) 6. Muslims will protect jizya payers, with even own life on the line durning war. 7. He can follow laws of own religion unless it's extrimism. [ like burning wife alive with dead husband . or burying of daughter alive. etc.] 8. Woman, children, old man and woman, poor man and woman. Don't need to pay jizya and can live without paying it. 9. Kafirs who accepted to pay jizya without war, their temples/mandirs /churches etc. will be under muslim protection. 10. No need to pay defense tax that is paid by muslims. And more and more

[@cs-a7n]

​@@LionsHeart3.1.3So basically non muslims has to pay taxes for their basic rights. Bs.

[@LionsHeart3.1.3]

@@cs-a7n muslims too have to give taxes. why are you playing victim card?😂

[@fatimadarling9656]

I am a non-Indian muslim and I had read a little bit about Akbar. Like his made-up religion of din-e-ilahi. I honestly thought that this religion was just a mix of Islam and Hinduism in scriptures. However, I did not know this much details about his murder of 30,000 innocent civilians. This video has opened my eyes. Thank you

[@babutara7374]

Yes after the war of Chittor, he ordered the killing of 30k innocent common people living in that Fort city.

[@Myname-wh5yu]

Every ruler did acts like that. How do you think an empire was established without killing civilians

[@sridharb2900]

The same holds True for Ashoka the Great. He is portrayed as a monk after he converted to Buddhism. Truth is he killed 1000s in Ajivakam religion after turning into Buddhism. Every the Great has the worst side in them, be it Gandhi to now Modi

[@priyadharsanmarimurugan8768]

All kings will do this sir.. but the point is If she talks about all such kings from Shivaji, dhananandh to European kings and Arabic origin kings ... it would be much better... Learning pros and cons of all kings in history is important ..not only the cons done by foreign invaded kings

[@Arani_M]

Absolutely!

[@PrithaBhowmick-cb1cz]

Lol 😂 ashoka was Buddhist before killing anyone. Know the real history stop justifying one action of horror with another

[@PrithaBhowmick-cb1cz]

​@@Arani_Mlol your islamic ppl are danger to humanity

[@vvrlive5]

Dude it's already mentioned in 6th standard text books. He converted to Buddhism after Kalinga war.

[@fury9173]

Damn, these videos are eye openers. Shame on every who calls these invaders great! Great work ma'am!

[@Keerthihistory]

Thank you 😇❤️🙏🏼

[@subhadeepmandal2221]

​​@@KeerthihistoryI really got bemused where from u assess this kind of political views on historical aspects. 1. Muslim marriages were never been any ceremony. Unlike Hindu marriage, which is considered to be building a Caste - Gotra relationship between two families -- there by they conduct lots of pre nuptial rituals like feuneral of ancestors -- Tarpana, Shraddha, then Pooja of the clan deity , Pooja of land ( vastu), Pooja of main Hindu gods -- Lord Vishnu etc etc -- so it had been elaborate customs -- Muslim marriages are just contract between 2 person -- a legal formality only. All the extravaganza that we observe now a days around a Muslim marriage, had actually rooted to the family's caste/ clan roots , infact often being severely criticised by ulemas as anti - Islamic. So it was quite obvious that none of Akbar's marriages ( even with Turk or Ujbek ladies) too were never ceremony or worthy of being mentioned. 2. In those age , accessibility to imperial Harem for any man other than emperor himself was practically impossible and a capital punishment for the violator. Hence the emperor's concubines were always been very very private. Turks and Timurids have strict customs to entirely separate their ladies from any public & state affairs or interference. So it was obvious the empress ( Malika - e - Hindustan) was just a honorary title to get all the best privileges within Harem -- like best of foods, ornaments, slaves and maids, best of the chembers, medicines , health care etc. But beyond that they were sanned from any state affair. Hence the courtiers could not write about her. In fact if they would shown any interest about the empress , they would have put their own lives into dangers. This customs was not exclusive to Turks or Timurids. Even for Hindu king's concubines too used to be put under equal restrictions in those days. It was completely unfair to expect an mediaeval empire to behave like a modern day's liberal woke guy.

[@sumayyashameer4153]

​@@subhadeepmandal2221❤

[@JaiSriRam119]

​@@subhadeepmandal2221You are suffering from Hinduph0bia and Muslimania, Ji ha di sm. Visit a good doctor

[@JaiSriRam119]

​@@subhadeepmandal2221No matter how hard you try, u can't change the Truth. Now cry hard ji ha di

[@JaiSriRam119]

*We all Hindus should take a moment to Honour our ancestors who even in extreme situations didn't convert to this Adharma spreaders and stayed true to their Hindu identity🙏🕉️*

[@satishbhanse7454]

True... We should learn from them.. itself shows how they loved our culture

[@silentbyte196]

No, it's a fallacy called survivorship bias.

[@JaiSriRam119]

​@@satishbhanse7454Yes😭They sacrificed their lives for our Religion🕉️ We(Current Hindus) are not even 1% as Hindu as them😭

[@anulagnabasu9854]

Who exactly were Adharma spreaders?

[@JaiSriRam119]

​@@anulagnabasu9854Muslims☪️

[@niyazdeen06]

Madam. Tell me the Manipur history please.. PM is still missing.. Why US and France visit. Tell that history also.

[@xyz8018]

Please see tv or read news paper. No need to tell that which is obvious in the present media. Please take digene or gelusil which will control your stomach burn.

[@Mgod215]

If Akbar was not great so,why Ashoka was great he killed all of his brother's except one - In his young age Ashoka liked to tortured their civilians that's why they called him chanda ashoka,He destroyed kallinga why He is called great ????from north-east India.....😅😅Ans plz:-

[@WowPrashant]

Bhai kalinga war k baad ashoka ne kiya kara vo nhi jnte ho unko kitna hurt hua tha. Aur hn india ko unhone United kiya us wakt. That's more important. Aur hn common people ko marna aur ek soldier ko marna isme different hai bhai. Usne kisi ka dharm parivartan nahi kiya. Na hi koi extra tax dusre religion pe lagaya. Instead unhone last m sb kuch chorke bodh dharm ko accept kiya

[@ravangaming1356]

Kyunki woh Hindu Hai😅

[@vruddhilalka3814]

She made a video on it, you will get it if you search 'Ashoka the Great?? Keerthi History'

[@abhijitkumar4576]

Well to be honest no emperor deserves great title if we look at their lives carefully and it's true to have a big empire you have to be ruthless and cruel and oppressive those who become kind hearted their empire is destined to fall

[@mahakmahak7122]

We should keep in mind that the history was full of 'The Greats' because of whom the common people had to suffer in many ways just for various types of greeds of 'The Greats'. And we should not give the title of The Great to any ruler be it Hindu or Muslim cause for what they did in the past was just to consolidate their power and all. We should focus on our present and should make sure not repeat such incidents in present towards any community.

[@sudeeptanathbhowmik8714]

I love how every hindu nationalist things that hindu rulers are good and all non Hindu/islamic ruler are bad I wish history was this simple

[@javedsheikh4141]

Yeah this is what andhbhakti is like

[@shishirbobate2846]

One of the rare rational comments.

[@cs-a7n]

But when you look at Gaza, you guys clearly knew who are good and who are bad. Then history was so simple?

[@ty814]

@@cs-a7n Yes Israelis are bad and carrying out their cruel deeds in the name of security. They are not fighting but killing innocents. History is this much complicated. Once victims are now showing that they a were anything but a victim. FYI:I don't need your opinion though cause it would be biased in favor of Israel for no reason.

[@whyareyoulookingformynamehuh]

Finnaly

[@swatiupasani8008]

Very well researched...good to see next generation is taking interest in what actually must have happened rather than believing everything showed to them ..keep it up❤

[@LionsHeart3.1.3]

Benefit of jizya(protection tax) : 1. Jizya payers won't be forced to participate in war or be needed to join the war. 2. He can live with his family peacefully in the land. 3. Muslim's will establish his and his families right to practice own religion. 4. Muslims will protect his property. 5. No need to pay zakat tax that is paid by muslims as charity.(Zakat can be > Jizya) 6. Muslims will protect jizya payers, with even own life on the line durning war. 7. He can follow laws of own religion unless it's extrimism. [ like burning wife alive with dead husband . or burying of daughter alive. etc.] 8. Woman, children, old man and woman, poor man and woman. Don't need to pay jizya and can live without paying it. 9. Kafirs who accepted to pay jizya without war, their temples/mandirs /churches etc. will be under muslim protection. 10. No need to pay defense tax that is paid by muslims. And more and more

[@RedRebel008]

1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

[@RedRebel008]

@@LionsHeart3.1.3 Don't justify Jizya, I'm a muslim too but, Jizya is pure bad, and all these conditions were not met even after receiving the tax, and also even after abolition these conditions were fulfilled.

[@LionsHeart3.1.3]

@@RedRebel008 Madarchud Don't talk about what u don't know. Stop sucking liber@l d!cks. Jizya is justified 100%. U pay tax to hindutva govt and u Won't question their corruption but when Islam says ur tax will be used to protect u and would be returned if we Don't protect u. How is that bad? And by saying Jizya is bad u have becomea definite kafir. Because law of Allah can't be and never be wrong and by saying law of Allah is bad u have become kafir.

[@anulagnabasu9854]

0:38 Should we be more critical about it just because he was an invader? Or is it because he is a human being like everyone else and is bound to have faults? Shouldn't history be critical and unbiased not depending on whether the person is an invader or not? 6:48 You earlier made a video about Dara Shikoh. In it you mentioned Majma ul Bahrain right? In that book Dara Shikoh states that the basis of hinduism is actually monotheism and he refers to the Rig Veda as his source. Also, Baba Lal Bairagi states this. The Brahmo Samaj is based on monotheism as well. Dara Shikoh compares Hiranyagarbha with Allah. Maybe, the same case has taken place here. 5:44 I have read somewhere that Mirza Aziz Kokaltash had joined Din-i-ilahi after he faced discrimination in Mecca. I can be wrong about this. 8:29 He plundered cities that he conquered right? Many rulers of Ancient India had followed the policy of conquest and expansion. Invader or not, he was the emperor of India, right? Where would the plundered wealth go except India? He was not perfect and of course, not a holy saint. He was a ruler, a politician. He was born and supposed to be one. Sometimes moral values and politics don't go together. Now, has this got anything to do with him being an invader?

[@battlerushiromiya651]

I think many people here and she herslef, have made up their minds by looking at Akbars birth religion, it does not matter how different his kingship was from Islamic or even Timurid models or how much his actions are similar to other Indians kings that these may hold dearly. Their opinions of him are made up due to Akbars birth religion.

[@anulagnabasu9854]

​@@battlerushiromiya651Maybe or maybe not. But what do you think about the second point of my comment? Can you please tell me? I am actually a child. I study in class 8.

[@battlerushiromiya651]

@@anulagnabasu9854 I am not really familiar with Dara Shikoh. You can read about Dara Shikoh in 'Dara Shikoh:Life and works' by Bikram Jit Hasrat

[@anulagnabasu9854]

​@@battlerushiromiya651Thank you 😊

[@jinzypetter3519]

There is a humble request for all. Please try to understand that, if a person is Hundu or Muslim it doesn't matter, the matter depends on the heart and what they gave to the world. Akbar gave good as well as bad. It doesn't mean he is supreme due to his good doing and not the devil due to his bad doing. And primarily it's about a person ( a single living human being), not the religion. So there is nothing to do with Hindus and Muslims. Don't make it a religious issue. Meanwhile, Keerthi it's great, what you are doing. Even in UPSC PREPARATION, the mentor won't teach too deeply. Keep going. Great job. Love it and learn it a lot. Thanks from my whole heart. Sorry, if I unintentionally hurt anyone from above written.

[@krishnachawla9147]

Tell that to the 400 million Hindus who died under Mughal rule.

[@Mrinal-or3fu]

​@@krishnachawla9147400 million to us samay ki population bhi nhi thi ganwar😂

[@Mrinal-or3fu]

​@@krishnachawla9147ye to tune pappu wali baat bol di Matlab andhbhakt bhi pappu hi hote hai

[@Mrinal-or3fu]

Why is she not exposing ashoka like akbar? This is hypocrisy

[@krishnachawla9147]

@@Mrinal-or3fu English please

[@K.Navaneeth]

8:38 is the Best thing I have ever listened!

[@krishnabhojne]

I can't imagine how much effort you put into thie detailed research. Man, how I wish I could live with you to listen so many historical things and intake knowledge. Thanks for this video!

[@Keerthihistory]

Trust me, I talk history to none of my family members!

[@krishnabhojne]

@@Keerthihistory Oh man.... I thought you must be. As I keep talking with my family members 😀

[@justkcworld4796]

​@@Keerthihistoryi know they are not interested in your lecture 😂 joking and the fact about akbar is right may be 'the great' title dosent deserve him but he was one the greatest king in mughals and Muslims if that era ashoka was also selfish before kalinga war every king is a invaders until his intentions and action don't harm peoples in the kingdom....

[@Bulletshyri]

@@Keerthihistorymake some videos in dark side of Ashoke , Prithviraj chuhan , shiva ji how he stopped the hajj pilgrims , yup u cant make and have no dare to make videos on this coz u too know u will loose all your WhatsApp university followers, well be happy ,create whatever u want to create 😂🥱, Savidhan me tou Akber the great aj b hai or hamesha rahega 🥱🔥😎

[@RedRebel008]

1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

[@sudha3081]

Kudos, Keerthi for your passionate and critical analyses of distortions of Indian history. Keep posting well-researched videos. Appreciate your effort.

[@RedRebel008]

1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

[@abushalibu1433]

You never agree Akbar the Great Because you will not construct tall statue to Gandhi

[@ackermangirl9278]

I am glad there are still some people in your audience who do not believe everything blindly. Stop spreading hate.

[@invincible629]

My father he is a historian laughed while watching jodha akbar movie

[@Narrator_of_Tarikh07]

Movies generally don't try to be historically accurate.

[@Pavanasree0606]

My interest towards history is going on increasing only because of ur valuable information.. Thanks a lot keerti Akka ♥️

[@RedRebel008]

1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

[@aniketganguly941]

This seems to be an unbiased analysis. Well done.

[@Keerthihistory]

😇❤️🙏🏼

[@choudhurycompetitivehub1017]

@@Keerthihistory read little bit and do full study in your so many vedios many facts are not accurate if teaching history teach in a better way not like WhatsApp University

[@MrNobody-op6sc]

@@choudhurycompetitivehub1017 from Rahul Gandhi National University of Propaganda

[@jennison316]

​@@KeerthihistoryPlz waiting for the negative side of Modi ji 🎉😊 Plz reply to my comments to as u reply to ur aganda comments Am waiting For both

[@shemeemshafeeque851]

​@@choudhurycompetitivehub1017yes exactly said . Keethi mostly comes with biased opinions about history ..keerthi dnt be prejudiced while explaining the history , you are pushing and dividing the communities to chasm. Whatever the centuries old history does not do any good to the current civilization. You must keep yourself from explaining the history in such a way that instigates the communities ...

[@Madhavi6131]

It seems all we learnt in history is wrong, even in movies also they portrayed very great about Akbar, thanks to you dear Keerthi for bringing out this video😊😊 😊😊😊❤❤

[@battlerushiromiya651]

She proved nothing though, none of these actions are even remotely different from what even Indian kings who she looks upto did. We dont know much about their wives, many of them also tried to glorify their own GOds and frankly all of them used harsh violence against their enemies. She is reaching.

[@LionsHeart3.1.3]

Benefit of jizya(protection tax) : 1. Jizya payers won't be forced to participate in war or be needed to join the war. 2. He can live with his family peacefully in the land. 3. Muslim's will establish his and his families right to practice own religion. 4. Muslims will protect his property. 5. No need to pay zakat tax that is paid by muslims as charity.(Zakat can be > Jizya) 6. Muslims will protect jizya payers, with even own life on the line durning war. 7. He can follow laws of own religion unless it's extrimism. [ like burning wife alive with dead husband . or burying of daughter alive. etc.] 8. Woman, children, old man and woman, poor man and woman. Don't need to pay jizya and can live without paying it. 9. Kafirs who accepted to pay jizya without war, their temples/mandirs /churches etc. will be under muslim protection. 10. No need to pay defense tax that is paid by muslims. And more and more

[@hriday1341]

​@@LionsHeart3.1.3imagine you have to pay jizya to aurungzeb that he will be using against marathas . I don't think anyone will be willing to finance their own destruction .

[@LionsHeart3.1.3]

@@hriday1341 How is saving India by slaying parathas a bad thing? Every proud Indian would support Mughals becaus ethey destroyed parataha culture, sathi prata, r@pe culture etc. Cope hard guvarputtars anti-indians😂

[@RedRebel008]

1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

[@RedRebel008]

Mam, I think this is just a mistake so I'd like to add - 1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners. As A Muslim I wish every one in my community and other communities could become more like Akbar.

[@ranjithkumar-my6pk]

Hats off to you and your efforts. Till day we are all studying history in weong manner and incorrectly 😢. I wish your videos could reach each nook and corner of our country so that atleast few of us will be aware of our real history 😢

[@RedRebel008]

1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

[@i_am_very_happy798]

​@@RedRebel008Copy paste karte rehte ho...

[@RedRebel008]

@@i_am_very_happy798 I take it personally when someone tries to distort history 🙂🙂🙂

[@thearjunnair]

Mannn Keerthi☺️☺️☺️☺️😍😍...I came here to make fun of your accent and the way you speak. But it's been five hours and I'm hooked to each and every one of your vedios . Massive respect . You earned this follower!!!

[@thomasthomasphilp4393]

Most Indians have an influence of native language with accent. Scottish have an accent

[@karthik8759]

Thanks for giving everyone a new way to think about history and to make it interesting for everyone And pls make a video on kittur rani chennamma

[@Keerthihistory]

On it already!!!

[@karthik8759]

@@Keerthihistory thanks for your reply

[@padmaja_here]

thank you for telling our true history without any bias ❤️ I have been following you so long and I wish to say this, you've improved your English considerably ❤️

[@Keerthihistory]

😇❤️🙏🏼

[@JaiSriRam119]

*Justice for 1990 Hindus in Kashmir, 2002 Sabarmati, 2003 Nandimarg, Girija Tickoo, Nikita Tomar, Kanhaiyalal, Harsha etc😭😭* And Iam talking about things that this Community did in a "Hindu-Majority country" *In countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Iran etc the number is in Millions😭😭* This is Proof for "All Religions are not equal"

[@JaiSriRam119]

Islam = Adharma Proof :- quran chapter 9 verse 123, chapter 8 verse 55

[@JaiSriRam119]

*We all Hindus should take a moment to Honour our ancestors who even in extreme situations didn't convert to this Adharma spreaders and stayed true to their Hindu identity🙏🕉️*

[@abhinavmaharaj4804]

😂😂 without bias 😂😂😂

[@vishwajjjjj]

Make a full detailed video about Vijayanagara empire and shri krishna devaraya,because even Mughal king Babur mentioned Shri Krishna devaraya in his autobiography and said that he would not dare to attack southern part of bharat because of the presence of Shri Krishna devaraya ,he was undefeated his whole life.....but school/college history books don't teach much about them...

[@bharatmahaan2991]

Yes...just 2 or 3 sentences are allotted to the great king...

[@mayankbudholiya7436]

Keerthi ji your analysis is awesome..from art to history the way you explain things in such a simple manner..hats off to you... love from Jhansi ❤

[@shravanigite2899]

You are doing great job didi..keep it up...jai hind jai bharat🔥

[@Keerthihistory]

😇❤️🙏🏼

[@karanjotsingh5220]

After watching the video "My Mother Came Upon," I can proudly say that I sat through the entire duration. Despite my mother's limited understanding of English, primarily being a Punjabi speaker, she also dedicated her time to watch it. However, due to the accent utilized in the video, she encountered difficulties in comprehending the content. Consequently, I took it upon myself to narrate the entire video to her, and we both derived immense enjoyment from the experience!👍😌

[@LionsHeart3.1.3]

Benefit of jizya(protection tax) : 1. Jizya payers won't be forced to participate in war or be needed to join the war. 2. He can live with his family peacefully in the land. 3. Muslim's will establish his and his families right to practice own religion. 4. Muslims will protect his property. 5. No need to pay zakat tax that is paid by muslims as charity.(Zakat can be > Jizya) 6. Muslims will protect jizya payers, with even own life on the line durning war. 7. He can follow laws of own religion unless it's extrimism. [ like burning wife alive with dead husband . or burying of daughter alive. etc.] 8. Woman, children, old man and woman, poor man and woman. Don't need to pay jizya and can live without paying it. 9. Kafirs who accepted to pay jizya without war, their temples/mandirs /churches etc. will be under muslim protection. 10. No need to pay defense tax that is paid by muslims. And more and more

[@Sid30499]

Thank You For Telling Us Reality About "Akbar The Great"

[@Sanskritam16]

Akbar was a mleccha . Don’t you see mleccha mixed kids who are product of Mughals , making fun of South Indian, why because we are brown. So ignore them

[@RedRebel008]

1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

[@tazwarwali07]

The way you portray everything in the guise of secularism and very carefully promote Hinduism proves that Akbar was far more straightforward and secular than you ever will be.

[@rohitt3783]

Christians (and few Muslims) are spending a lot of effort in converting Hindus n natives of India in even TODAY'S times!! This needs to STOP. Keerthi you should consider talking about this issue ...

[@anilnair9007]

KEERTHI, YOU ROCK. SO ARTICULATED EXPLANATION. SO SIMPLE & LUCID. YOU GIVE THIS GENERATION, A CHANCE TO PUT THINGS IN PERSPECTIVE, RATHER THAN ROTE THE EXTRACTS HANDED DOWN GENERATIONS.

[@kalyanpesala4550]

History means as it is.. you are a true historian

[@Keerthihistory]

😇❤️🙏🏼

[@gulnaazshaikh2769]

😂😂

[@user7np13]

Due to such serials and movies people forgot about his dark side 😑. They believed that he was the geart empiror. I hope they will realise the reality from this video. Great job didi 🥰👍

[@Keerthihistory]

😇❤️🙏🏼

[@JaiSriRam119]

*Justice for 1990 Hindus in Kashmir, 2002 Sabarmati, 2003 Nandimarg, Girija Tickoo, Nikita Tomar, Kanhaiyalal, Harsha etc😭😭* And Iam talking about things that this Community did in a "Hindu-Majority country" *In countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Iran etc the number is in Millions😭😭* This is Proof for "All Religions are not equal"

[@JaiSriRam119]

Islam = Adharma Proof :- quran chapter 9 verse 123, chapter 8 verse 55

[@battlerushiromiya651]

If you think this is bad, most Indian kings have also done the same things as Akbar had. The invasion of Cholas to Sri Lanka also led to violence against civilians, even the Marathas are remembered in bengal for the pluinder their mercenaries did. Moreover than that, Indian kings have always glorified their own Gods, with the help of the priestly caste, nothing new here. if you think these things dont make Great, then neither are most Indian kings.

[@thamizhansameer6334]

​@@JaiSriRam119டேய் சங்கி..பயலே ...தமிழன்டா❤

[@JapanInDan]

As a history teacher, I found this video to be a very useful tool for my students. We're studying the Mughal Empire as a part of our Eastern Civilizations course and I used your video to demonstrate the issue of studying "Great people of history" and how bias can seep into our textbooks and lessons. Thank you so much for your wonderful work!

[@FCntertainr]

The movie days Akhbar was born in a Rajput Hindu home so he knew many Hindu traditions. Also he relieved Bairam Khan of his responsibility when he saw mutiny in Khan eyes. He didn't kill kings of vanquished kingdoms and enslaved prisoners of war. He ended Mughal corruption if Sharif Hussain who took over other kingdoms illegally and raped women well Adam Khan did Maham Anga son. Many in the area protested the movie 🍿🎥. King Hemu has a statue but just the war?

[@angryjedi8563]

Why are we not focussing more effort on making underrated kings who were great, brave & just? And focus on bringing down people who are considered great (real or not)... because that is what trends now and sad Keerthi is following it. Keerthi consider a series of episodes on Chola Vs Pandyas enmity history... and how Chola lineage is not traceable now... There are so many kings in Dravidian kingdoms in the last 1000 years, but we are not hearing enough about them.

[@ishrakalvi4446]

She Won't get views unless she spreads lies about muslim empires😂

[@kannybandi]

I have been waiting for this content sis,bcoz of you I got interest in history,respect for my culture and embracing my culture 😊😊

[@yuvasurya7986]

Plzz tell me what is your source ... I mean how did u know all this .. In books even in google evruthng written falsely ....

[@i_am_very_happy798]

Bro she's a historian...

[@arnavkhatwa2426]

​@@i_am_very_happy798soo she should provide her sources right? Historians do that

[@GlobeTrekker-j6y]

Appreciate for coming forward and making such bold history recall. Upanishad helped in Copy & Paste which started long ago. Great... Keep rocking !!!! History books might need correction ???

[@ramkumarswathi5774]

Beautiful explanation....I keep showing all your videos to my eigh class daughter Thank 3

[@ajayvellanki]

Thank you for lighting on Akbar's dark side 🙏🙏

[@Keerthihistory]

😇❤️🙏🏼

[@JaiSriRam119]

*We all Hindus should take a moment to Honour our ancestors who even in extreme situations didn't convert to this Adharma spreaders and stayed true to their Hindu identity🙏🕉️*

[@sofiyakochi]

6:50 Considering you as true history reseachers, you should already know the Hinduism evoled from a religion now we called vedantic religion where there is mention of one god but slowly it transformed polytheism

[@RedRebel008]

Damn, I did not know that, I'm gonna steal this, and BTW if she was a historian don't you think she'd be challenging the current theories instead of making youtube videos, she herself doesn't believe what she says.

[@vamcOnYT]

👏👏👏 Good job, Keep it forward 👍

[@Keerthihistory]

Thank you, I will❤

[@ackermangirl9278]

If she tells you something, how do you guys not question her! You are questioning the things you have studied for you entire life with the things she is saying without even questioning her for the facts. You can trust her more than what was taught to you at school?? Who is she and from where is she bringing all this? We are not sheeps to believe just what you say!

[@krishanusengupta7710]

I came to know about your channel yesterday. Simply brillant, the work the effort and the authenticity is top noach. Channel like your, Dhruv, Soch by Mohak Mangal, Nitish Rajput and SeeKen Jigyaasa are soo important to today's society. Really proude of you didi.😁😁

[@ramasukumaraluri9354]

Madam, You are Great..... Very Clearly, Authoritatively You are Explaining the Real History... And It wd be Proper for the Central Govt to Have You as a Member in the CBSC syllabus Committee.... ThankYou....

[@RedRebel008]

First of all its CBSE and not CBSC 1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

[@poojashree6763]

U r my guru ❤ blessed to have such channels

[@Keerthihistory]

😇❤️🙏🏼

[@JaiSriRam119]

*Justice for 1990 Hindus in Kashmir, 2002 Sabarmati, 2003 Nandimarg, Girija Tickoo, Nikita Tomar, Kanhaiyalal, Harsha etc😭😭* And Iam talking about things that this Community did in a "Hindu-Majority country" *In countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Iran etc the number is in Millions😭😭* This is Proof for "All Religions are not equal"

[@JaiSriRam119]

Islam = Adharma Proof :- quran chapter 9 verse 123, chapter 8 verse 55

[@Explorewithmahesh4]

I hope u will continue this work and educate Indian youth for longer time. Hope all success to u Keerthy 😍

[@Keerthihistory]

Thank you 😇❤️🙏🏼

[@RedRebel008]

@@Keerthihistory mam i'd like to add the following - 1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

[@SMARTYTAB_]

I like how you guys always say that "Many historians says that" but never actually mention even one

[@adityaskad8213]

in historical facts which has "no" mention of Jodha bai at all. Yes, there is no trace of Akbar's favorite wife or loved one - Neither in ancient... While we may eulogize for their love-saga through this fictional dramas, the actual truth lies in historical facts which has "no" mention of Jodha...If at all there is any claim of his favorite wife then it is Empress Ruqaiya Sultan Begum, a cousin whom he married at the age of 15.We have been taught that Akbar was a great Mughal Emperor but in reality as per written in the historical books it is totally opposite.

[@ParbatiParida-x6t]

Hy didi im a student of BA first year history really surprisingly the facts which We were taught in school was all a lie after joining college i came to know many True facts and the story behind them and like a great guide who guiding us in every step i found you as a best guide for a history student like me thanks a lot didi you are such a brilliant lady❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@RedRebel008]

1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

[@sugunbtwj]

Can you explain how aryans invaded harappans and destroyed them..... Don't try.. People may know the truth. You deleted this comment also.... Why are you so afraid.....

[@samarthpawar1504]

Aryan invasion theory is bs... It's a colonial propaganda and has been debunked hundred of times by indian historians... It was introduced to create the mindset which you have today and i guess they were pretty successful🎉🎉🎉

[@mondalmriganka]

Best out of the worst . I love your last sentence😂

[@LakshmiKamathVlogs]

Wow! Loved this analysis! You just earned a new subscriber ❤ Keep going!

[@khaasgaane5843]

Her posts are prime examples of the fact that hate sells better than anything else in India today. There is lot frustration in India due to various social factors and Indians have found a way to vent that frustration by targeting a particular community through social media for a temporary relief. This will cumulatively result in a catastrophe for India.

[@samarthpawar1504]

No... A particular community can't digest facts and so they cry 😂😂😂 You just want the good sides then go see some other channel

[@sadenb]

The essence of upanishads is not polytheism. It is actually oneness. In fact , the main essence of it is "aham brahmasmi" , that one individual can realize Brahman , the universal consciousness. In that aspect, what Akbar was trying to do is not too much different from the text. Although, the ego is the one driving that which is completely against the upanishads.

[@battlerushiromiya651]

Bro, most Hindu kings also created texts with the help of priestly caste to furhter their own dominance, Akbar is not alone in this regard at all. Are you ready to judge them as well?

[@Mrinal-or3fu]

​@@battlerushiromiya651most of hindu kings blended sanatan to thier own mentality this lady just wanted to say akbar was an invader what kind of invader stays in a country which was inavded by him ? He was born in Indian subcontinent (hind) plus do we even know where akbar came from ? Also at what basis she is calling him an invader? When it is clearly stated that india was not even a country but a subcontinent back then and as far as I know then any indian king who invaded or fought other Indian kingdoms should be called as invaders . And it cannot be possible that indian king never invaded any place of or killed any peaple

[@roshanvijay5399]

Akbar married so many women, so he is bad at administration, hence he is a bad ruler.... What logic yaar ? 😅

[@avinashsoundararajan313]

In that case Chatrapathi Shivaji had 6 wives.. Those days Kings had many wives. That should not be brought as a big deal. Our mythology King Dasaradha himself had 1000+ wives...

[@kumaraswamyv4354]

Keerthi dear உன் கீர்த்தி தமிழ்க மக்களுக்கு மட்டுமல்ல இந்திய மக்களனைவருகக்கும் போய் சேர்ந்து அவர்களுக்கு விளிப்புணர்வை ஏற்படுத்தி உண்மையை உணரவைக்க எங்களது ஆசீர்வாதங்கள்

[@krishnaraokasturi2512]

Well explained by the young lady.congratulation Yes history was not mentioned properly.

[@tsrsubramanian2342]

You can be appointed for preparing the text books for schools across India 👏👏👌

[@sonar451]

Yup, She will write Rama as historical figure and Gandhi as mythological.

[@akshaylenin7166]

​@@sonar451Keerthi Akka will write about the dark reality of Gandhi and Khangress Party

[@sugunbtwj]

Akbar atleast took time to know about other religions. There are so many hindu kings who never did that... Aren't he better than that....

[@samarthpawar1504]

You kidding??? So according to you, if an Indian king kills people he is hindu, if he Doesn't, then he must be from another religion... Amazing😂😂😂

[@PriyaPandey-ws1pp]

More power to you girl❤

[@Keerthihistory]

😇❤️🙏🏼

[@MdSadique-vg7br]

00:58 Wrong it was not the first time a Muslim ruler marrying a Hindu princess even before akbar Marwar's king Rao maldeo married one of his daughter's to Gujarat's sultan mahmood and second daughter to Islam shah sur

[@mahalrangasrinivasarao2202]

Lot of facts gone unnoticed unearthed by you. Gr8.

[@vishnumr8252]

"He's definitely the best out of the worst". Yup that's the perfect description you could give him.

[@JaiSriRam119]

This tells everything about M us lim Community. Worst in our community = Best in their community🥴

[@JaiSriRam119]

This tells everything about M us lims. Worst in our community = Best in their community🥴

[@Mrinal-or3fu]

Well with that logic Best was akbar while worst were ashoka and aurangzeb

[@saravsarav614]

Good explanation 👏

[@Keerthihistory]

😇❤️🙏🏼

[@praveenv6827]

Why don't you do a video on manipur incident. Instead digging history... see what exactly happening now.

[@samarthpawar1504]

You have come to a history channel😂😂😂😂 What were you expecting???

[@AryanRaj-p5q]

Hi , Keerthi I am a class 4 student. I am a very big fan of you. I am also very interested in learning Indian history. I always watch your videos , and I learn a lot of things like the videos about the truth of the Mughals.

[@SweshRajputt]

He Doesn't Deserve The Title Of Great But He Is Definitely The Best Out Of Worst!! Well Said !!

[@subhadeepmandal2221]

Very disappointing narrative. I mean in that scale who was a great King ( kindly don't bring hindu mythology in History). Even rajput kings too have 100 s of concubines . Rana Pratap himself had many wives and he too fought and killed many of his brothers in succession struggle. Chittore had put up extremely stubborn resistance -- not that they had a very prosperous fort or skilled soldiers. Only point was the area ( central Rajputana) was extremely difficult terrain and chittor situated there -- the fort dweller s had enormous battle advantages over any seige. And every King was invaders.

[@JaiSriRam119]

This tells everything about Muslims☪️ Worst in our Community = Best in their Community

[@JaiSriRam119]

This tells everything about M us lims. Worst in our community = Best in their community🥴

[@seerlavenkatapriyanka]

Maharana Pratap didn't fight for area...he fought to save the culture... I don't agree 100 percent to what Keerthi told or you are saying. One thing is true so many kings fought for area... Indian kings themselves fought for area why to blame invaders ? But the difference is we enever forced religion or something like that... In whole story of what Keerthi told i agree with her last point

[@subhadeepmandal2221]

@@seerlavenkatapriyanka Who told u that Hindu kings didn't impose their customs ? They were worst of the Casteists and Racists. They completely annihilated Sudra culture, imposed severe social restrictions, denied minimum human rights to them. Rajput fiefdoms were just group of querreling Casteist clans. They never vived for a consolidated, deciplined State -- rather always wanted to have pockets of own fiefdoms . This was exactly the problem Akbar faced. Because he wanted a consolidated Indic empire. But this mewar was just an obnoxious separatist fiefdom -- neither did they accept any political truce or vesaalage with Mughal Empire nor they themselves were interested in building a united Rajputana empire with whom at least the Mughals would have come to a rational treaty with their strength!! Instead they were always a kind of miscreants -- the separatists from all part of the empire used to take refuge in Mewar ( not only local Rajput fiefs, even Afghan and Seljuks too who were bigger enemies to Timurids. Akbar faced lot of difficulty in managing this affair and couldn't concentrate on North West possible attacks from Afghans and Seljuks of Iran / Ujbekistan. Hence he decided to crush mewar once and for all. *Forget Mughals , even Maratha empire also had to fight and devastate the Rajput fiefdom far more than any Muslim kingdom* !!!

[@Deepak_Dhakad]

There is difference between invasion of Hindu King on other hindu king and invasion of muslim King on Hindu king.

[@muhammedhajat9391]

I like the way you portray your view on Akbar. Sounds like a TRUE LOVE STORY where a supposedly Muslim man falls in love with a supposedly Hindu lady (due to his love for her he puts love before religion and tries to reconcile between the 2 religions). History of Akbars story - its a thin line in being crazy and being in love ❤❤❤ 🤫 ...

[@DARKKNIGHT-jk2eo]

Stop spreading fake history facts u what's app university student

[@Deepak_Dhakad]

Akbar did some bad work doesn't means he is not great. He united North India after longtime. That period was golden age , peaceful and flourishing compare to choas before mughals.

[@agniswar3]

Yes he was a good administrator.

[@agniswar3]

But calling him a saintly figure wouldn't be right.

[@priyadharsanmarimurugan8768]

@@agniswar3 none of them called... Akbar, the Saint sir.. 😄

[@anulagnabasu9854]

Aham rudre bhirvasu bhischaramyaham adviteyi rutavishwa devaih Aham mitravarunobha bibharmyaham indragni aham ashwinobhah 6:06-6:09 Find any similarity with the above text? 6:50 What can we find in the above text or in the Gayatri Mantra?

[@surveysy7561]

Keertiji, you are amazing in your history. My American wife is also good in history, but her subject was Roman history. I will show your videos to her

[@thinkerthinker3274]

You are really destroying India's secularism and diversity. No one is perfect, they had their own qualities and weakness. But you are so biased and only highlighting their negative sides. ☹️☹️☹️😡☹️☹️☹️ Why can't you accept the diversities as a part of history?

[@NativeVsColonial]

Can you accept this verse from a so-called “Holy Book” ? Qu'ran 47:4 “So when you meet those who disbelieve in Allah, strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom [them] until the war lays down its burdens. That [is the command]. And if Allah had willed, He could have taken vengeance upon them [Himself], but [He ordered armed struggle] to test some of you by means of others. And those who are killed in the cause of Allah - never will He waste their deeds.”

[@tintunton2330]

Politically motivated historians teach you and preach you so that you can vote one party😂

[@maheshprasad4334]

Converted chal nikal

[@ishrakalvi4446]

​@@maheshprasad4334Alhamdulillah they are converted from the filth you pagans are indulged in.

[@sugunbtwj]

Why didn't other Great Hindu kings never tried to learn about other religions like Akbar did... Don't delete this comment.

[@krishnachawla9147]

They didn’t need to. Hinduism has grown up in a sea of dharmic philosophies where water from other sects occasionally flooded the ship. They were already tolerant. Akbar had to adopt other teachings because he was only Muslim before. He had baggage.

[@Pakiza-i9r]

When we read medieval Indian history, we are told by historians that Akbar, who established the grand Mughal Empire in India, was a great ruler. He is given the nickname 'the Great' by these ‘eminent’ historians. According to them, he was the greatest among all the Mughal emperors. He had a great personality, his political and military feats were unmatched. The religious policy of the kingdom he adopted towards people of other faiths, especially Hindus, was liberal, accommodative and tolerant, thus qualifying him to be called ‘the Great’. According to historians, Akbar is ‘great’ with many achievements, like unbeaten military campaigns, establishing and consolidating the Mughal rule in the Indian subcontinent with its historical extent and spread, the relative prosperity of his rule, and establishing administrative measures, which were copied down to the 19th century, etc. His personality was great, as he had many virtues. Although he was a Muslim, his empire was never Islamic. He married many Hindu princesses and was a very tolerant person. The epithet 'great' is also bestowed upon Akbar on the basis of his tolerant, secular, and liberal state policy. So, he is the perfect example of the national king

[@hriday1341]

It's about the word "great" which for some reason britain also call themselves . And also the fact that mughal empire and today's Israel is much more similar , It would not be wrong that they are the best place for minorities even the Muslims to live in the entire Middle East as they are pretty much secular and democratic but they are hostile towards non citizens who don't live there and are also good militarily . Now can they be called good or bad ? Occupiers or reformers of land ?

[@JaiSriRam801]

This girl deserves more support and recognition🚩. Hats off to u Keerthi🚩

[@Mithilesh_R]

Keerthi, your brahmin forefathers written about akbar in BHAVISHYA PURANA....😂😢 Yours is 100% damn video...

[@cuttima9239]

Sis can you please explain about Chola's dynasty

[@Keerthihistory]

Sure

[@bharatavarsha17000]

Nothing but facts 🔥

[@ackermangirl9278]

Every person has a good and bad side. Each person is a mixture of good and bad. Ashoka the great was also like that. He was the reason for the deaths of so many people but he embraced Buddhism and preached peace. Akbar's story is similar. Every great man has a legacy, but every great man has a story. Akbar was a great, liberal ruler. He wasn't perfect. He made mistakes. Being great doesn't make you keen to not make mistakes. Also, please mention the sources from where you are bringing all this information. It could also be heresy.

[@geethamanir9609]

Please continue your ork Keerthi. India really thrive for reality and facts.which are still unknown to most

[@arnavmehta2640]

love your works!!!

[@Keerthihistory]

Thank you 😇❤️🙏🏼

[@pcsravankumar7147]

If Akbar is still alive would you ever dare to speak all this ?

[@LapisPhilosophorum222]

Well, we live in a democracy now. Not an autocracy. If, hypothetically he comes back to life today, *he would be a commoner. Who is penniless.* So yeah. Hope you understood.

[@JM-vz2pn]

Very nice explanation...thanks to gomootra cola university 😂😂😂

[@CRPF_HARSH_HINDUTVAWADI]

he is not unedcuated like you

[@examppoint]

Converted spotted😅

[@FCntertainr]

Thanks!

[@SatishNatarajan]

I wish you had talked about the siege of Chittorgarh at a greater detail. This alone is enough to refute the claims of his liberalism.

[@loksremo4937]

Your research and everything is fine. But where are you getting all these points in most of your videos that always supports Hinduism and opposes Islam. Like every single video in which religion is involved and there's no secularistic point of view, even though you would have studied in your history book as "India is a secular country". In your every video, you support only Hinduism and indirectly oppose Congress leaders, non Hindu leaders or rulers. And just because majority of our population is Hindu, they also believe whatever you say without knowing your intention. Think on your own guys. What she says is just a perspective. Hinduism or Islam is just a religion. This will bring hatred towards other religions.

[@NativeVsColonial]

Let me find you the secular book, upon which the major world terror outfits are based: Qu'ran 47:4 “So when you meet those who disbelieve in Allah, strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom [them] until the war lays down its burdens. That [is the command]. And if Allah had willed, He could have taken vengeance upon them [Himself], but [He ordered armed struggle] to test some of you by means of others. And those who are killed in the cause of Allah - never will He waste their deeds.”

[@samarthpawar1504]

It's not secularism...what you want is escapism😂😂😂 go to some other channel for that, you won't get it on a history channel which is talking about facts... Not self concocted lies and fantasies..if you can't handle the fact that hindus were killed by muslims rulers then it is your fault.

[@shahatul6520]

What she is telling are the facts of history which have been suppressed by Nehruvian historians. She only touches the real history. Our real history is full of courageous kings which Nehruvian historians even could not digest to read . She is a bold lady who brings true history to our knowledge.