I appreciate the fact that you don't voice your personal assessment on every director and every film. And then you give a comprehensive list. Aces.
@heinoustentacles5719 Жыл бұрын
Ha, I love it too. Like when I noticed the crook in the Hitchcock movie was wearing blackface, I was just waiting for him to virtue-signal about how bad and outdated it is, as if viewers don't already know--but he keeps his eyes well focused on the craft.
@totallyfrozen Жыл бұрын
@@heinoustentacles5719 I think MW might already understand that virtue signaling has no value.
@MehdiHusain Жыл бұрын
Maybe "why" might be a good question. From my cinema school, only the Elamidam students survived. A few others were far superior storytellers and even knew better how to put an idea in a frame but teachers were too happy to get the crane out and producers prefered the flashy ones anyway. There's only one way to breed classicism : to learn among other professionals and to climb the ladder as you show expertise. But our time worships the mavericks.
@muesli_snipes Жыл бұрын
It's the same thing everywhere. Modern culture has more affinity for hacks and showoffs than for competent, diligent professionals.
@Tyler1290510 ай бұрын
how should a person go about learning from other professionals and climbing the ladder to show expertise if they're starting from ground zero?
@theigman0999 ай бұрын
@@Tyler12905 when you're starting from zero, go full elamidam! you are trying to learn, and if you only attempt classical styles, of course it can go great, but it restricts your scope of creativity. once you've gained some skil and confidence, that is when you worry about climbing the ladder, atleast thats what i think moderation is key
@Tyler129059 ай бұрын
kind of like orson welles saying he was ignorant to what he could and couldnt do so he tried whatever he wanted @@theigman099
@Saturn2888 Жыл бұрын
After Zach Snyder's Justice League, I have a completely different view on his works. Also, he's in love with 4:3 and gave me a real appreciation for it. After seeing his Justice League version, I can't unsee how every recent movie cuts off people's heads. CinemaScope is supposed to take the full frame and make it anamorphic. Now, all they do is chop off the top and bottom. It sucks. Instead of feeling wider, it feels claustrophobic.
@sunshinejonson9060 Жыл бұрын
He's the worst DOP also. Look at all the dead pixels in Army Of The Dead
@RaysDad Жыл бұрын
Amélie directed by Jean-Pierre Jeunet is my favorite "look at me" film.
@hypnocoil3968 Жыл бұрын
The first time I realized you can over-direct a movie, I was watching Elvis by Baz Luhrman. I just wasn't able to put it into words, all I knew was, watching it felt like my sense of sight and hearing are being bombarded every 0,5 second. It was nauseating.
@PiggyVanHausen Жыл бұрын
That's baz luhrman in a nutshell. Elvis felt like a trailer thats lasted over 2 hours. It seems like with each movie he actually gets worse in this sense.
@afrosymphony8207 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely loved it nd that style of cinema, sometimes film critics obsess too much on the "why", forgetting that film is just like every other art where the feeling evoked by the aesthetic quality of is just as important as the "why". i dont give a shit if finchers camera moves in panic room lacks a definite "why", it has no fault to me because its soo much fun jan, get it.
@PiggyVanHausen Жыл бұрын
@@afrosymphony8207 I'm sorry, but I might be one of Fincher's biggest fans, but even I can tell that shot in panic room, while cool aesthetically, is just stylistic brain numbing over substance and proper marrative. I usually don't agree with many things this channel says, while I understand whereany of his critiques are coming from, I see many as too extreme and coming from a big love to the past and denial of present forms. But this video is spot on to me. And I don't think it's wrong for a director to somrtimes use a shot like the one from panic room. But you need to be conscious of the type of movie you're making. Fincher has said many times that panic room, along with the game, is just a popcorn movie to entertain, nothing more, so I think he was pretty conscious and intentional about it. On the other hand, I genuinely can't defend elvis, it's not about me overthinking the why of each shot, it's about hating the editing which doesn't let you appreciate any single moment even for a few seconds and shows you each moment as a footnote in his life yet expects you to be fully moved by each different emotion with the help of overdramatized shots and music, while the only thing needed for people to actually feel the importance of each moment is to actually give time to each sequence. Focus on less sequences but make each one last a bit longer.
@PiggyVanHausen Жыл бұрын
@@afrosymphony8207 I'm sorry, but I might be one of Fincher's biggest fans, but even I can tell that shot in panic room, while cool aesthetically, is just stylistic brain numbing over substance and proper marrative. I usually don't agree with many things this channel says, while I understand whereany of his critiques are coming from, I see many as too extreme and coming from a big love to the past and denial of present forms. But this video is spot on to me. And I don't think it's wrong for a director to somrtimes use a shot like the one from panic room. But you need to be conscious of the type of movie you're making. Fincher has said many times that panic room, along with the game, is just a popcorn movie to entertain, nothing more, so I think he was pretty conscious and intentional about it. On the other hand, I genuinely can't defend elvis, it's not about me overthinking the why of each shot, it's about hating the editing which doesn't let you appreciate any single moment even for a few seconds and shows you each moment as a footnote in his life yet expects you to be fully moved by each different emotion with the help of overdramatized shots and music, while the only thing needed for people to actually feel the importance of each moment is to actually give time to each sequence. Focus on less sequences but make each one last a bit longer.
@PiggyVanHausen Жыл бұрын
@@afrosymphony8207 one of my favorite directors is danny boyle, and I'm sure many people would argue he over directs. But I believe he chooses his movie scripts often very deliberately and his stories suit his style. Trainspotting is great, how it's directed puts you in the shoes of the main characters and shows you how ignorant they are of the dangers they are putting themselves through. But elvis is supposed to be a big drama of a real life, but I can't take it seriously because it's treated so bombastically
@SillyWillyFan47 Жыл бұрын
Thanks. I shall go to the local DVD rental and ask for an ELAMIDAM section. It'll save me sooo much time!
@m_nikitin Жыл бұрын
Aw, that shot in 'Panic Room' is just perfection. It continues to inspire me. Sometimes, a shot can be purely experiential, a beautiful and innovative moment that inspires others. But here, it's more than that - the long take creates a sense of intrusion happening in real-time, making our characters vulnerable without the safety of editor cuts. And the lock, the coffee pot, etc. - they all contribute to the rhythm necessary for the long take shot.
@afonsolucas2219 Жыл бұрын
Also the fact that the camera is by no means restricted. We're not bound by physicality. I think it furthers that intrusive feeling.
@gillian_honn3 ай бұрын
Its awesome
@TheXelsky Жыл бұрын
This channel is better than most film schools
@sheets75 Жыл бұрын
The Quick and the Dead is my favorite example of ELAMIDAM. The story is utterly absurd and divorced from reality, so Sam Raimi compensates by using absolutely every trick he can possibly think of (which is quite a lot) to distract you from it. Almost every shot in the movie has something going on. It's nowhere near his best movie but it's just...interesting.
@totallyfrozen Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the suggestion. I’ll give it a look. Is the story the Louise L’Amour book the Quick and the Dead? I read that one as a kid.
@sheets75 Жыл бұрын
Not based on a book (there was another movie with Tom Selleck, I think, that was based on that novel). Raimi's is a spaghetti western imitation in which Sharon Stone plays a gunfighter taking part in a quick-draw tournament to get revenge on Gene Hackman. Also has Russell Crowe and Leonardo DiCaprio.
@dr.juerdotitsgo5119 Жыл бұрын
Sam Raimi's "ELAMIDAM" on the "Take the f*ck!ng elephant!!!" scene from Darkman is absolute perfection! On the other hand, having not seen Panic Room, those stylized shots are the most embarrassing crap I ever witnessed, at least out of context. Is it a comedy or something?
@jkapp374 Жыл бұрын
I appreciate both styles very strongly as they provide contrast... sometimes I do get a little weary of the newest and most modern directors who are showy and call attention to their work... But by and large I think we need both styles.. that being said favorite 'showy' director would still have to be Brian De Palma.
@danielrudolf5441 Жыл бұрын
Also you should look up the work of the famous film theoretic David Bordwell. Back in the 1980s (of course a lot of time have passed since then) he put movies into four categories based on their narrative style: The classical style (basically what you covered under "invisible directing") The modernist style (the arthouse movies from the late 1950s onwards) The Soviet formalist style The parametric style
@Cinephileofmany Жыл бұрын
Wow. Haven’t heard that name since uni
@marcdraco2189 Жыл бұрын
I just cannot get enough of this channel. Now I've managed to "perfect" my screenwriting to the degree I know where I'm going, I needed some direction on, er, direction. I'll admit that on my budget these fancy camera moves (even Hitchcock's) are out of the question BUT I'm less afraid now of blocking. My latest short has three characters at a bar for the majority of the script, but now I'm more confident I can block it in a way that will tell the story - I'm thinking it more like a fixed stage where the camera is an audience member rather than dragging them through ... a keyhole? Really?
@totallyfrozen Жыл бұрын
Of course it’s not just movies. Modern TV shows are rampant with it. To my eye, it makes a director look like they lack confidence in the story. Like they are trying to give the illusion of action or tension or movement because there just isn’t any. I saw a few scenes of a TV show the other day where the cast was simply engaged in dialog, but every exchange was shown with shaky closeups and angled shots. It was unnecessary. Looked like the cameraman was having a medical emergency. Started to give me a headache. Shaking, tilting, panning, zooming…all for some verbal dialog in a room.
@Chaogardenx Жыл бұрын
Film is a visual medium, i think directors showing off is what continues evolving the medium
@fancyshoestring1947 ай бұрын
"ELAMIDAM." I spit out my soda!
@bobbyjosson4663 Жыл бұрын
Favourite showy directors for me are Welles, Kubrick, Scorcese (though his films suffer as much from it, especially as he is a cold director, and his best are a mesh of perfect subject matter to style). None-showy: Lubitsch, Ford, Capra, Preston Sturges, Ophuls Others mix the two; Wyler, Wilder, Lean, Hitchcock, Coppola, Powell and Pressburger, Spielberg - who use it the way a close-up should be used, sparingly and acutely. I'm so involved in the story through the classical style that I'm captivated and the flourishes seem perfect (the aircraft scene in Best Years of Our Lives, the fall down the stairs in The Lost Weekend, Pip falling into a delirium in Great Expectations, with hand held camera-work and the throbbing sound).
@SenorTucano Жыл бұрын
Elamidam. Thank you for adding a new amazing word to my vocabulary 🙏
@MightyGAN2 жыл бұрын
Loved all your videos. Superb
@Moviewise2 жыл бұрын
Glad you’re enjoying them
@nihaalsandim9986 Жыл бұрын
Im gonna talk like ELAMIDAM as if its an actual formal existing term , and use it so much that it becomes a reality
@auntkami Жыл бұрын
Steven Spielberg - this is mostly a nostalgia vote and because he seems like a really good human being. Drew Barrymore says really good stuff about him from when she was a child actor. There were some kids who re-made an Indiana Jones movie and he sought them out to congratulate them. Lastly, when I was in elementary school we had an assignment to write some fan mail and I was the only kid in class to get something back. It was from his production company, but still he gets my vote every time. I wouldn’t think of him as super showy. He does a lot of action films so he kind of has to be. But when you reviewed the Oscar nominated directors of 2022 you pointed out how he went full ELAMIDAM on “West Side Story.”
@daviddenton4234 Жыл бұрын
totally agree! I actually find it easy to pick out Speilberg's ELAMIDAM - his blocking, cam movements, even the absurdly placed humor.
@evanwakelin7944 Жыл бұрын
That ending with Dennis was the best! Haha. love it.
@MartinMunthe11 ай бұрын
Your channel is brilliant. Thank you!
@imaginnova Жыл бұрын
In defense of ELAMIDAM, I'd argue they're not always screaming look AT me, but maybe screaming look THROUGH me...look at how I see the world or wish it was. or maybe as a hopeless ELAMIDAM myself, I'm just lying to myself about why I like the visceral, tactile experience of those movies. what's wrong with a Flair-Gun being your weapon of choice? lolz
@mantabond Жыл бұрын
Learning of the existence of this channel, of this video essayist, may be compared to, after having wholly imbibed a bottle of fine red one learns there is another bottle yet. And fried pork.
@rickyvvvvv Жыл бұрын
My favorite showy director is David Lynch. My favorite unshowy director is Sidney Lumet. Although I am not quite sure if Lynch counts as a showy director. His shots are quite simple.
@shiven513 Жыл бұрын
His showiness comes from the editing and writing of his movies.
@MicahMicahel5 ай бұрын
sometimes his camera will race to a goal or destination. he does one shot long takes, also his choice of music creates a distinctly Lynchian feel in every moment somehow. People move slowly and they are framed in consistant ways. great composition.
@MicahMicahel5 ай бұрын
sometimes his camera will race to a goal or destination. he does one shot long takes, also his choice of music creates a distinctly Lynchian feel in every moment somehow. People move slowly and they are framed in consistant ways. great composition.
@rickc2102 Жыл бұрын
Since you already mentioned Wes Anderson, my favorite elamidamirector is Panos Cosmatos.
@TiagoCavalcanti-ji6hu Жыл бұрын
What about straightforward storytelling (like it coulda been a play) in film like, say... "The Man From Earth", "12 Angry Men", "Rope", "My Dinner with Andre" or even "Mindwalk". I know those are basically conversations. All of which trapped me curious for a couple hours. No tricks. Should you allow a couple tricks, but still in the realistic approach and in the low-budget/ no-budget realm, I'd love to know where you stand on "Primer", "Coherence", "Exam", "The Decline Trilogy" (Dennis Arcan), "Tape" (basically any Richard Linklater movie). Those ones. How do you like them ?
@kalamar2 Жыл бұрын
very necessary video!!! thanks a lot. any of my favourite showy ones, like Melville or Tarantino, feels invisible, meaning this that they make you believe the only way their stories would exist is through the way they tell them. others (lynch, gilliam...) just feel wanky to my taste. concerning invisible ones, the epitome to me is howard hawks, along with john ford.
@kewaoni3995 Жыл бұрын
No, we don't need to move through the keyhole. But I don't know what we lost by going through it. Sometimes classical, sometimes ELAMIDAM; sometimes whiskey neat, sometimes on the rocks, sometimes in an old fashioned.
@MonsterKidCory Жыл бұрын
Both styles have their place and can be good or bad depending on who is doing it. I love the solid craftsmanship of classical films. But I also love Moulin Rouge!, Bram Stoker's Dracula, and Scott Pilgrim vs. The World. My all-time favourite director is Georges Melies, so make of that what one will.
@Jilktube Жыл бұрын
7:31 no amount of this kind of Elamidam will ever be able to top Orson Wells and Herman J. Mankiewicz directing their camera through a neon sign in Citizen Kane.
@mattresbert Жыл бұрын
Brilliant stuff I learn something new every video Ive always liked Raimi, Fincher and Aronofsky the literally spray Elamidam all over you
@paulsansonetti7410 Жыл бұрын
2:59 I heard you paint houses ? I thought it was called " The Irishman "
@noitesdevento Жыл бұрын
elamidam is a nice term
@michaelsauceda9154 Жыл бұрын
0:17 what movie is that shot from?
@furkonige Жыл бұрын
Michael Bay is the master of ELAMIDAM, I am filming and using your videos to be better, I agree with 100% of your videos.
@PanteraRossa Жыл бұрын
I believe "formalist" is the actual academic term for what you're talking about but elamidam is much funnier to say.
@angelanento4206 Жыл бұрын
Anyone know the movie they show at 3:22?
@zulfikarfilandra Жыл бұрын
what's the film on 3:23? Excalibur?
@salmonetesnonosquedan8345 Жыл бұрын
Yes
@tylerdordon9911 ай бұрын
Wong Kar Wai comes to mind as the ultimate Elamidam director.
@adolfhipsteryolocaust3443 Жыл бұрын
What's the name of the movie with the knight stabbing the other night with a spear over the red moon background?
You came up with a better term that I did. Mine has been LAMIAAA, Look-a at-a me-a, I'm-a a auteur-a.
@anamacedo Жыл бұрын
The showiest of the showing, Baz Luhrmann
@macandcrafting2190 Жыл бұрын
great channel.
@Joeyspinoff Жыл бұрын
And yet, not even a single Baz Luhrmann mention ? 😮wow
@daugmulumba5086 Жыл бұрын
I love me some ELAMIDAM
@alcedob.5850 Жыл бұрын
Well, personally I find Baby Driver Wright's most stylish movie. It maxes out on everything I love about his movies. Except for Nick Frost and Simon Pegg but they are too British for it
@N_Loco_Parenthesis5 ай бұрын
Today it's Hitch who's my fave. Tomorrow?
@pazu2754 Жыл бұрын
3:24 What is this movie?
@christopherbostwick44764 ай бұрын
Excalibur (1981)
@pazu27544 ай бұрын
@@christopherbostwick4476Thanks~
@Johatsu Жыл бұрын
I understand your point of view but I didn't pay for my cinema ticket to watch a play. Personally I love David Fincher's style. The impeccable movement of the camera which passes through the objects gives a point of view that is both omniscient and voyeuristic which is used extremely well in fight club, it gives the viewer the impression of seeing everything and that nothing escapes them, which further reinforces the surprise during the final plot twist. 🤩
@shivani-peachypictures Жыл бұрын
Yes exactly.
@Flaming_penguin Жыл бұрын
narrow taste
@bearcb Жыл бұрын
Classic cinema is not filmed theater, it’s just not flashy. It does have camera movement, cuts, pans, zoom, etc. But the director doesn’t wave at the audience all the time shouting “hey, I’m here!”
@ftlbaby Жыл бұрын
Agree about Wes Anderson doubling down!
@snoo333 Жыл бұрын
Fincher messed up Aliens 3. made up for it on the fight club.
@visage123456 Жыл бұрын
My favorite showy director is Gaspar Noé
@juniorjames7076 Жыл бұрын
That is one director who is hellbent on getting his audience to throw up.
@raffaeledelpizzo8069 Жыл бұрын
Being italian I'm forced to mention Paolo Sorrentino who, in my opinion, is a very ELAMIDAM director hahaha.
@ya-ulitqonemo4810 Жыл бұрын
Congrats! You've invented a weel. Academics vs. formalists.
@patrickselden5747 Жыл бұрын
Wes Anderson's my favourite showy director.
@dsdonovan Жыл бұрын
Great term!
@fortheloveofbollywood461711 ай бұрын
Lol@ I heard you paint houses
@hvitekristesdod Жыл бұрын
Favourite showy director: David Lynch Least favourite: Gaspar Nöe… all style and no substance
@ThiagoMoura18 Жыл бұрын
From my POV you misunderstood the point. It's not just because you don't get it that should be labeled as cocky. Sometimes its not about the ego. Its just artists doing whats they always do (since daVinci or before)... Searching news ways to telling a story. Searching for new ways to impact the listener. Touching other layers. It's like to call Van Gogh a "Elamidam" artist. But, thanks for sharing man!
@luciferfernandez7094 Жыл бұрын
I agree about Fincher’s evolution: at his best he is on a William Wyler style, at worst he is whatever the f7ck Benjamin Button was.
@GypsyPirateАй бұрын
ELAMIDAMN!
@GrandSlamSilver Жыл бұрын
Glad you brought up the David Fincher shots in Panic Room, especially because he added the sound of the camera "whooshing" past the objects. 🤮
@Stepherner Жыл бұрын
Ethan und Joel Coen
@Markplaats-x1h Жыл бұрын
damn... you're demolishing every unnecessary thing my numbed out brain was consuming without a second thought I'm not sure if I like learning all this although, hej, in for a penny in for demolishing early david fincher
@Flaming_penguin Жыл бұрын
It’s still fine I think his point is just that these directors get too much recognition and people are missing the nuanced directors. It’s like loud acting vs subtle acting, both can be good but also have their moments
@Markplaats-x1h Жыл бұрын
No no, I'm on board. Whenever I understood nuance I always preferred nuance. same for subtlety. @@Flaming_penguin
@mikehansonbryan5365 Жыл бұрын
I feel like I learned more about film analysis from your channel than I did on any supposed film theory book (which is mostly based on the stuff Harold Bloom warned us about). I should read David Bordwell and his freinds/contemporaries as they seem like the only ones who actually understand film.
@Cinephileofmany Жыл бұрын
Baz Luhrmann (Cough cough)
@UMLB Жыл бұрын
omg thank you
@ingvarhallstrom2306 Жыл бұрын
Because it's COOL....
@NR-tr4tq20 күн бұрын
Peter Greenaway
@joaquinbendezu Жыл бұрын
I don’t know if I’m the only one but please lower the decibels on that “ding” sound effect. It gives me the shivers
@ThomasKalender Жыл бұрын
Ken Russel
@nigelgreen9369 Жыл бұрын
David Lynch
@gillian_honn3 ай бұрын
Sorry but I love Elamidam Its more creative
@danielrudolf5441 Жыл бұрын
Just my humble personal opinion but Wes Anderson is one of the worst directors today. The only good movie he's ever made is Royal Tenenbaums. Most of his work is tedious over the top style over substance and in later years he seems to be so all over himself that his movies are basically about trying to "over-Wes Anderson" himself without anything meaningful to add or say.
@sebastianwolfmayr Жыл бұрын
I watched Asteroid City a few days ago and I think he's just repeating himself. The same strange animations, the same crazy colours, the same quirky characters. I loved The Life Aquatic too btw, some other movies were also alright. It's just time for him to reinvent himself
@MichielHollanders Жыл бұрын
Not a fan neither although I did appreciate his take on Mr Fox
@andreasboe45092 жыл бұрын
Jean-Pierre Jeunet is the best.
@sunfacedelta9937 Жыл бұрын
Fit girl repack
@ЗинаидаГорбатенко-ф5я4 ай бұрын
Спецэффекты - метод оболванивания Здесь и резкий звук в придачу
@glenn.62022 жыл бұрын
Loved Guy Ritchie, he knows how to balance substance and style, his style amps up the emotions of the characters
@glenn.62022 жыл бұрын
and also, Sam Raimi and Peter Jackson
@Moviewise2 жыл бұрын
Ritchie’s over-the-top style is just what his over-the-top characters and dialogue need
@johncenter4858 Жыл бұрын
Guy Ritchie's Covenant has no style and it's boring as hell.
@MrSiDSaN Жыл бұрын
Kusturica=)
@sebasgonrod Жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@mercurious6699 Жыл бұрын
wonderful - and yes, while the showmanship can be impressive... it can also distract from the story
@MrShakespearefan Жыл бұрын
For me, I’m always looking at the direction, the style. I don’t think you can separate the style and the story.