We Are About to Discover a New Planet in the Solar System. And It's Huge!

[@dff19707]

Pluto: 1930-2006. Never forget.

[@zimriel]

Ur-ay-nus, never mispronounce

[@notw1015]

Hee hee hee😅

[@nightwaves3203]

hehehe desk fools thinking they are doing something.

[@lelandarcher4760]

It's Anus; Ur-anus. Something smells shitty here 😮😅

[@Digikidthevoiceofreason]

Pluto: 1930- currently still a planet.

[@Upzkale]

I remember when it was called “Planet X” when I was a kid when Pluto was still a planet

[@cryptokids3760]

Still is. The other people are just confused 🫤

[@HighmageDerin]

Pluto still is a planet! It will ALWAYS be a planet.

[@ImJeremybear]

Make Pluto great again!🐻

[@rugershooter5268]

First thing I thought when they said 2016.....these people are not good at science The reason Pluto is not a planet is because it has NOT cleared all the rocks from it's orbit.......Earth has 2 rocks, even named, in it's orbit.....so they should be calling it planet 8

[@HighmageDerin]

@@rugershooter5268 By that standard Mars is not a planet Earth is not a planet Jupiter's most definitely not a plant. Nor is Saturn..... Or uranus.... Or Naptune....... Because all of these bodies have rocks floating around them!

[@sicxdaez]

It wasn’t first proposed in 2015. It’s been called Planet X for decades then pluto was declassified as a planet

[@owlcowl]

This particular object with its specified features was first hypothesized at that time based on the orbital data provided in the paper. The fact that earlier proposals for large trans-Neptunian bodies were often referred to as Planet X in the popular press is irrelevant.

[@JDDees]

@@owlcowl Much like you!

[@jerometruitt2731]

It's been called Nibiru longer than that and bad things happen when it comes back around.

[@1legend517]

Planet X just sounds better imo.

[@CrystalGaming6142]

Planet 9 is a no. Planet X is a yes.

[@richardchildress9031]

they have been talking about this back in the 80's, they called it planet X

[@peterdeans4635]

Yep and we have good reason to believe it's the astroid belt. When they sent the probes out to look for it, at the Jupiter flyby one of the scientists said this. If we stayed on earth we would be closer to what we are looking for but out here we don't have light pollution of the sun ??? It's doesn't take 3600yrs either and besides a planet seven times our size wandering in and out would drag us off as a moon. Sumerians told us it's broken, the astroid belt is it's crust, 2015 we started seeing comets behind us but could never catch them passing, the next year we saw them again ( their tails were the same as the teat before) but never passed us again. Then a friend caught one of these objects , observing it's tail it had been left of the north pole then took a turn moving to the right of np and headed back out?? What's it orbiting out there, have you seen the snake coiling around a stick,, lay the stick down . They are coming over the top of the ab towards us and droppolng vertically through the ecliptic and heading back out under the ab back up and over ( like looking at a spring) those three pieces are the mantle, there is also a core complete with magnetosphere. We have seen a red stripey object in daytime but if it was the whole planet like I said we would now be a moon, inside this red object is a tiny mass so only messes with our weather, quakes and volcanoes maybe weird em type things like uaps but not a Holywood impact or 3 mile high tsunami, our grandparents were around last time we aligned with it. Take care👍😊

[@1legend517]

It's been that called that far long before just the 80s.

[@1legend517]

Planet X just sounds better imo.

[@richardchildress9031]

@@1legend517 yes, I was tell my experience when I was 6 years old.

[@daomingjin]

sure, but you're not being paid to write academic papers about it probably...

[@JASON-rq5gl]

Can't believe it's took so long for the human race to discover this planet, I passed it on the way to earth in 1973.

[@wyattm6782]

💀

[@RoyaltyHasGoneCRAZY]

💀

[@KRAKEN777-u7b]

So do explain the new arrival to the system which has tilted E. Rth

[@JASON-rq5gl]

@@KRAKEN777-u7b Because it is not new, the planet as a elliptical orbit meaning it's orbit as been at its outer distance and it is now approaching its cycle to its closest orbit to the sun, so it approach will obviously have affects. Eath ancient civilisation Sumarians were present at the time just as it was at its closest orbit to the sun. I'm sorry to say you will personally not be still alive as it will still take a over a thousand years to be at its closest orientation to the sun for it to be better visible from earth.

[@KRAKEN777-u7b]

@@JASON-rq5gl I guess you have not seen early morning horizon or notice the 5HIFT ...

[@AbadaleRavnic]

In this day and age shouldn't we ask Pluto what Pluto wants to be?

[@davidivester7025]

What are its pronouns?

[@Bravosnowdawg]

@@davidivester7025What is its genders?

[@alancharlton3867]

Planet V (5) is what is now The Asteroid Belt. Planet X (10) is thought to be Nibiru.

[@alancharlton3867]

Pluto should be what Disney created it to be........an animated dog.

[@VisiblyPinkUnicorn]

Its pronouns are icy/cold.

[@RavenWolfheart72]

Pluto will always be planet 9 to me.

[@MrSummitville]

Then you do not understand what the Kuiper Belt is ..

[@erwinmarcial656]

same

[@Bingo264]

Pluto is to small and is orbital is not in the ecliptic plane

[@Speedy_dew]

Long live planet Pluto

[@thebreadwitch2470]

2 people in the comment section of this comment don't understand what he means.

[@melissamullins3564]

They’ve know about Planet 9 Planet X etc. since the 70’s

[@ryderyoung762]

May you elaborate please?

[@melissamullins3564]

@@ryderyoung762 in all civilizations whether it be ancient China the Myans Egyptians etc have documented on clay tablets about another planet that passes every 3600 years that can also be tracked back in the Bible by the flood the turning back of time by 15 yrs hail storms and so on that happened throughout history of this planet passing and the things that it causes to happen as it gets closer and the Bible talks about in the end times of the earth tilting and wobbling like a drunkard. It’s so much and hard to explain at the time because I’m going to be late for work but it’s 5 times the size of earth and the magnetic pull it has on the earth as it gets closer will be a lot of chaos such as terrible unexplained weather meteor storms the seas raging tsunamis etc. if you look up Gill Broussard Planet 9 it will give you the best info out there

[@joshgilbert3239]

Bugs Bunny and Marvin the Martian would visit on occasion

[@robertalexander8086]

YUP.

[@EricKay_Scifi]

They've also seen discrepancies in galaxy rotations, from at least the 1980s. This have led to searches for dark matter. These distant errors in our solar system is probably the same but smaller effect.

[@neisanland2503]

last time we had an apocalypse that caused civilizations to fall and disappear leaving behind ruins and cutting our history down to forgotten. last time was 11k - 14k years.

[@jeremy-cb2nn]

What you're talking about is the last period of glaciation in this the Great Ice Age.

[@logicbug]

Were you there?

[@dantheman9167]

Correct

[@09simon16]

The Younger Dryas

[@devinjanosov]

That was actually more like 9000-8500 years ago (7,000-6500 BC, great earthquakes, seas rose and blocked England off from Europe, etc.). Stop fear mongering.

[@FRproductions888]

Imagine if they discover planet 9 and they discover irregularites in the orbit and realize there is another one more far away

[@marko-qg4gc]

Imagine Voyager hasn't left the solar system afteral.

[@YutaBLv]

Imagine if shut up

[@marko-qg4gc]

@YutaBLv imagine if, you follow your own advice.

[@Grisker-mrow]

Planet 10 🔥🔥🔥🔥

[@TheRetroPlayer-mf8yh]

​@@YutaBLv are u a rage bait? Cuz im falling for it😏😏😏

[@mikopolar1070]

This is a stretch but it is said that a planet gets near earth every thousands of years in intervals that causes extinctions (asteroids/comets) and coincides with mass extinction events that occurs in earth... that could also explain ancient structures and civilizations that disappeared and recently discovered that were much older than current records available...

[@windowxp1946]

this is the planet 10 if pluto is never forgotten

[@omadaw]

I have great respect for Pluto, had a lot to deal with lately.

[@itsmeagain7825]

Pluto will never be forgotten 🎇

[@rwboa22]

It would be "Planet X" (even though Pluto was called that before it's discovery).

[@Aiden-t2m]

I love Pluto, I would go as far as to say it is my favorite planet (even with earth being our home) but it got declassified as a planet cuz it was one of all the objects in the solar system, and to classify it, we would have to classify every object as a planet, I guess mercury gets a pass because it was close enough to Ganymede in size 🤔 anyways why not classify only oval-shaped or spherical planets that aren’t asteroids and orbit the sun and not a planet, so Pluto should be a planet but also not.

[@russwalker3119]

First: any planet in our Solar system is NOT NEW, just because we haven't seen it means it 'may' only be new to us now. Nibiru was claimed to have been near Earth 26,000 years ago, and perhaps this is that same planet with a 13,000 year cycle of perihelion.

[@peterrutt7409]

When they say “new planet”, they really mean “newly” or “recently” discovered.

[@nikilaunisimon2182]

We have 39 planets in our solar system, with earth being number 40. People are going to go NUTS when they realize how misled we’ve been. More and more people are waking up and it’s amazing. I just wish it would speed up a little 🥹

[@anylewynde5173]

​@@nikilaunisimon2182 does that make you an accelerationist ?

[@robfredhjr]

Huh?​@@nikilaunisimon2182

[@i.Nocturne.i]

​@@nikilaunisimon2182what do you mean

[@davidnalmasalazar7322]

I've watched a lot of videos on this topic and so far this is my favorite cause you showed facts, beautiful!

[@alemayehusolomon941]

If this turns out to be true, it would be fascinating! What a feeling to discover something that causes astronomy books to be updated :)

[@Alfred-Neuman]

Yeah but it's also possible that it's just a small and boring black hole...

[@sirwalterii_2nd]

​@@Alfred-NeumanI personally wouldn't call a black hole especially one this close to Earth as boring. That would rewrite history books

[@AmbientMaze]

Naa they legitimately say it’s a red dwarf star that also orbits our star… that it turns out we’re actually a binary star system🤷🏾‍♂️

[@djmjr77]

Especially when it rolls through the solar system every 10000 years and causes chaos..

[@Mr.SugeWhite]

Them demoting pluto did that and i didnt find it exciting in the least. It was actually quite irritating.

[@fartinthewind933]

I come from a time when Pluto was still considered a planet and I still consider it a planet so this means 10 to me.

[@annm4833]

YES!! Pluto is 9 so this one is 10. 👍

[@the_dark_one6052]

I also come from that time........but definitions improve with time. So should you.

[@mpmpm]

"I come from a time when Pluto was still considered a planet and I still consider it a planet so this means 10 to me.": That's 'just' nostalgia. If Pluto is a planet, then other objects like Eris are also a planet. Sure, we could agree to that. But then we 'need' a new definition for 'planet'.

[@StuyJamaicaYonkers]

Call it what you wan to, scientifically they demoted Pluto because it didn’t meet the requirements but it is a planet so 9-10 don matter

[@angharaddenby3389]

Do you also, then, consider our Moon to be a planet? It IS bigger than Pluto. And there are at least 6 similar-sized asteroids. Do you count these too? Pluto is not even on the same PLANE as the other planets are, so it STILL can''t be one.

[@jgrab1]

Pluto was not discovered by gravitational influences. That it was located where they were looking was merely good luck. When the correct mass for Uranus was calculated, it turned out Neptune was right where it should be and was not being "pushed around" by tiny Pluto.

[@Skank_and_Gutterboy]

Exactly. Pluto is too small to influence those giant planets in any way. Pluto was discovered by luck and a VERY tenacious person.

[@polluxtroy1310]

It was my distant cousin who discovered pluto. His name was Clyde Tombaugh

[@MrSummitville]

But Clyde Thombaugh was looking for Planet 10, per Percival Lowell's math predictions per Neptune's orbit. Pluto was found where Planet 10 was supposed to be. They learned that Pluto was too small and they learned Percival Lowell made a math mistake, after discovering Pluto in the Kuiper Belt. Pluto was only a dot, all of the others planets are disks. Without Percival Lowell's math mistake, who knows when Pluto would have been discovered or by whom?

[@shadowraptors1132]

Caelus* not uRaNuS or uRiNeUs.

[@mexcore14]

​@@shadowraptors1132It's ok man, you can name Uranus whatever you want.

[@michaelbruns449]

Nemesis, Planet X, Cyclical Extinctions.

[@billstapleton1084]

Isn't it interesting that 6,000 years ago, the Sumerians knew about this planet.

[@derhell9401]

Anunaki

[@IchigoKurosakicool]

brother it could have been any other minor planets, proto hindus had all planets named by then

[@Vartazian360]

@@derhell9401 actually its called Nibiru, and the Anunaki were the 'people' from that planet according to the legend at least.

[@derhell9401]

@@Vartazian360 or that, i prefer the black hole theory though

[@Johnny_Appleweed]

Yeah except that they didnt

[@pei-enhuang4858]

Well, we can observe planets and stars millions of light years away in another galaxy, and still can't confirm the existence of Planet 9 in the Kuiper Belt😢

[@rahulsangvikar7973]

Stars are extremely big in size and emit light, planets are extremely small and do not emit any light. In fact, one common technique for identifying planets of distant stars is to get lucky when it crosses in front of its star which causes a dim in the light we receive from it. Planet 9 can't be hunted by this technique as we lie between it and our sun.

[@meatflap6239]

I was just about to post the same question/statement. Can't figure this one out for the life of me.

[@Chadillac-xq7xk]

​@@meatflap6239 The way we find planets around other stars is because we can see them pass in front of their star. When we're looking outward for a planet, we're looking for a dark object against a dark background.

[@Hi-pk5mf]

@@Chadillac-xq7xktrue, plus not much light reaches it so we can’t see it good.

[@joaom2057]

It can be in the Oort cloud. Noboby saw the Oort cloud either

[@himynameis6502]

It’s called Nirbiru. It’s where the Annunaki have been stated to come from. It bring cataclysms every 11-13k years. The last one being roughly 12,000 years ago with the Younger Dryas occurring. *Looks at watch*: Oh look, yes, you’re right, we’re going to be finding out about it personally very soon.

[@jeremy-cb2nn]

Your watch? You mean the timepiece that the believers in Nibiru declared to be the work of witchcraft?

[@nancylavalle370]

This was my thought as well.

[@hook-x6f]

Absolutely. Pluto in Aquarius. Not since 1778 has Pluto been in Aquarius. Just look at the significance of the founding of America and the principles of freedom. Astrology is science we learned from cosmos. There is a new day coming.

[@desertweasel6965]

It actually causes catastrophe every 3600 years. The last time it came through was 1600 b.c. when we had a global flood. Every 3600 years and they believe we are close to that time now, because 3600 years before the flood we had an ice age, 3600 years before that we had a mass extinction event of most humans and all of the neanderthals. When if comes through our Solar system it's Sun goes behind our Sun and it can't be seen. This planet will approach from the South Pole where no one is or can see. Only people in Antarctica can see both Nibiru and it's Star. That's why they won't allow any citizens to go to certain parts of Antarctica. There have been very prominent scientists who have went to Antarctica and although they would specifically say what they saw, they were very disturbed and said it was pure evil. He's talking about the fact that our government knows this planet is approaching and they are going into their bunkers. We will be left on the surface and there will be massive, 500 ft tsunamis and massive Earthquakes as the Earth's plates shift right under us. It will flatten everything, not a single stone left on top of another.

[@pamalahalpert4063]

Please where can I find info on this ? I'm fascinated

[@SwastikaSanghiIITR]

Namaste! The video was very very very good. It covered a lot of information and at the same time wasn't heavy to take in. It got me to search a lot of terms, phenomena and questions that came in my mind on the web.😄Will try to check the mentioned references later. Please note that at 7:27 you have the factors flipped, it should be 19 times for pluto and 31 times for neptune.

[@ez1-030]

Are you thé yoga teacher in GTA v ?

[@laurele861]

It’s Planet X, not Planet 9, as our solar system already has more than 9 planets, including Pluto. Planet X is the appropriate term for a hypothesized but undiscovered planet, with X referring to the unknown, not to the number 10.

[@tallnavyguy5382]

To say that, "our Solar System already has more than 9 planets, including Pluto," is incorrect. As recognized by the International Astronomical Union, or "IAU" for short, there are only 8 official planets of our Solar System: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. Pluto and a host of other objects are called "dwarf planets," and they do not meet what astronomers have agreed upon is the official definition of a planet. Please do your research before posting online misinformation and disinformation as likebait.

[@Potato-gg8in]

Pluto is classified as a dwarf planet, so it’s 8 planets. Otherwise Ceris, Eris, Makemake, and many others would be planets too.

[@Toyzher]

Wormwood

[@426krosas]

What potato-gg8in said disliked

[@laurele861]

@@Potato-gg8in They all are planets. Dwarf planets are a subclass of planets just like gas giants, ice giants, and terrestrials.

[@susanbruce8974]

Z. Sitchen made predictions about the planets that satellites have confirmed. He made them after reading Sumerian texts.

[@billytollerton4220]

And Carlos mundos Ferrada,also chief naval officer Dr Robert Harrington.

[@Rooneyg493]

Great explanation 🎉Keep it up

[@TheSecretsoftheUniverse]

Thanks! ☺️

[@michaelshields5921]

Just a couple of theories explored by myself and my best friend in high school in the early 1980's . How do we know this is a planet ? , since it has this much effect on some objects why doesn't it have effect on all planetary obits around the sun or does it ?. Could this be why all planets have a elliptical shaped orbit ? The orbit shown in the model shows Planet 9 at a close orbit of the sun , if this is the case would that not be enough to disrupt the whole gravitational rotation of the 8 known planets to the point of destruction ? , since it moves so slowly . Is it possible the object is a micro black hole or is it a second star that burned all of its gasses and is just a dead core orbiting our solar system . Which is a causing gravitational pull against larger objects causing them to traverse between the sun and itself in a larger elliptical pattern . So many questions and not enough real answers , yet many sound theories for now which may or may not be proven or disproved in the next 50 to 200 years . Jack Hortimer had a saying Keep Looking Up .

[@emuhill]

All orbits are elliptical. Even the Earth's moon has an elliptical orbit. Man made satellites have elliptical orbits too. At most this object could cause minute changes to these orbits. It could also explain why the solar system is tilted 6 degrees to the Sun's equator.

[@simplysteve68]

That was the late Jack Horkheimer, former director of the Miami Space Transit Planetarium, and host of those 5 min segments on PBS stations, Star Hustler (1986-1997) and later Star Gazer (1998-2014). 👍

[@TheGospelGuitarist]

The dead star is actually a current theory of a twin star system here.

[@andis60]

I don't care that it's been demoted, as a gen x baby, Pluto will always be planet 9 for me.

[@smgdfcmfah]

And Uranus will always be a black hole.

[@hrnsnfhsjddhsjfnsmjdjsd-xs9se]

And Neptune will always be a sun.

[@KeekeeHII]

and a moon will always be a planet.

[@jeremy-cb2nn]

Quit putting all gen xers in a bad light by refusing to acknowledge the fact that Pluto does NOT fit the definition of a planet.

[@KeekeeHII]

@@jeremy-cb2nn EXACTLY!

[@markcollins730]

Didn’t the Sumerians claim that the Anunnaki came from a planet named Nibiru which had an orbit of 3,600 years around the sun.

[@LonghopeBro-ju6jl]

And when it gets close to the sun it's just a short hop over to Earth to pay us a visit.

[@v1e1r1g1e1]

Certain people will be calling it Nibiru.

[@kuraito1346]

Never thought we could find another planet that didn’t exist until now. That will be crazy.

[@Justanotherfuckingobserver]

They've known, they just didn't want us to panic. We're going to be able to see it soon, a lot of people already are check out my what's really happening playlist part 2 with the most recent videos, part one was started 11 years ago

[@p0k314COM]

Something that actively masks itself can hardly be called a planet. If it weren't gravitational disturbances, this object, whatever it is, would be undetectable. And this at a time when sensitivity of instruments and observations of the sky reach back to almost the primordial origins of the present Universe but can't detect something that is in the backyard with the mass so large that it affects other planets in the Solar system.

[@Try2-Imagine]

It is interesting to see the JWT can see planets 2500 light years away but can see one in our own system.

[@oldmech619]

Observational bias is a significant factor in the debate over Planet 9.

[@p0k314COM]

@oldmech619 No, it's the usual fear of losing grants and jobs. In the current reality, anyone who speaks too loudly about something that should not be said risks everything. Which is typical of any totalitarian system. Events in recent years have only intensified this trend. Therefore, and in this case, scientists, despite their near certainty about the artifact on the outskirts of the Solar system, take neutral and distanced positions. Even the most outspoken of them only mention the presence of a black hole, but no longer add that no native black hole has a chance of such unusual behavior, but only one that is stabilized in an artificial way. There are reasonable hypotheses about an artificial wormhole, which, thanks to a gravitational collapse and the use of extremely advanced technology, allows travel over enormous distances.

[@louise_rose]

@@Try2-Imagine That's because when those telescopes "see" a planet 500 light years away, often it's not like they actually see it as a discrete point of light - what they're detecting often IS the gravitational irregularities, the "wobbling" of its parent star - and from that they'll deduce the presence of the planet and its orbit.

[@Chris.Davies]

You aren't the smartest tool in the shed, now, are you? Objects in our solar system do NOT give off their own light, they can only reflect the sun's light. And if they have a low albedo, and are far from the sun, then it is almost impossible to see them, no matter how large your telescope is. Objects that produce light are always easily detected. That's why we invented lighthouses.

[@irene_renaissance]

This is really fascinating and intriguing!! Thanks for explaining in such simple yet effective way that layman like me could have grasp of the matter. 🌌✨❤️👏

[@TheSecretsoftheUniverse]

You're very welcome!

[@davetelekom443]

So this is the so called Nibiru?

[@galaxy_lord218]

What?

[@phasematerialsresearch9319]

Yup..

[@rovinrona1251]

It is, and it's already disturbing our weather. The earth is titling. All large telescopes are now blocked to the public. .few years ago. Those who know, think a bunker will help 😅

[@rovinrona1251]

The remnants of Tiamot will hit first...

[@morgan-5171]

Nublack hole 🕳

[@MrCmather]

So huge? Huge enough to travel 3 days between the earth and the sun? 3 days of darkness?

[@eamonahern7495]

I didn't want to believe there was a planet 9 beyond the known TNOs because I found it so difficult to believe that our sun could hold a planet in orbit so far away from it. But this is compelling evidence. Now this puts a question in my mind. Could planet 9 being at its nearest to the sun have affected things such as the direction of the asteroid that's believed to have killed off the non-avian dinosaurs?

[@ronwiggins9081]

This is quite fascinating. The Bible refers to a strange planet entering our solar system. Revelation 8:11

[@jo_momma3270]

Yup!!! 😳👍🏻👍🏻

[@CurrentlyDuck1]

No, that passage is not about a planet. It describes something called "Wormwood" striking the earth. If a planet hit earth, we would all be dead and the rest of the prophecies could not be fulfilled.

[@arongilbert5828]

​@@CurrentlyDuck1It's the asteroids and debris in the tail when Nibiru passes

[@SickChicken776]

Pluto disliked this video

[@wyattm6782]

Real 💀

[@DARRKDARRKDARRK]

i love how the thumbnail is just an image of the dwarf planet eris

[@DARRKDARRKDARRK]

@@SixxWolfZx ok

[@The_Yenndo]

Yep

[@billytollerton4220]

Better know as planet x just like Elon called his twitter purchase ,and Nibiru, remember that name because your gonna here a lot more of it in the neXt few years.

[@ellierfromthebronx4531]

Space has first scared me as a kid and as I age, it never ceases to intrigue me. If there IS a planet 9, we will find it some day.

[@hornet224]

So what is the the orbital cycle time in years of Planet 9? 100 years? 10,000 years?

[@TheSecretsoftheUniverse]

Somewhere around 10,000 years

[@chrisschmitt291]

Probably over 11,000 years.

[@p0k314COM]

@@TheSecretsoftheUniverse Which in practice corresponds almost to a stationary orbit. Too much coincidences for one object.

[@billyhomeyer7414]

248 years

[@nimueh4298]

He mentioned it was 400 to 800 AU away, that translates to 37,000,000,000 to 74,000,000,000 miles in distance. That is a long orbit.

[@TrueManu]

Samael Aun Weor wrote about this planet 60 years ago.

[@EpicTetus-fm9lh]

you are not paying attention at all. planet 9 has been searched for since 1846, so more than 60 years.

[@safetybuddy]

Planet nine has been predicted for decades. It was not just thought up in 2016.

[@billytollerton4220]

😮you are being just silly with that statement ,are you aged about 15 this planet was all over the Washington post 25 years ago ,DYOR.😢

[@daomingjin]

you can bet that there is one of them out there that' has an orbital path of 3,600 years ;-)

[@kc7brj]

Thinking in simple terms, "the big Fish eats the little fish"....when a small space rock passes bigger rock its gravity pulls in the little one till it collides and becomes part of the bigger one...until it happens so often, its becomes a planet. Other bigger planets effect its gravity and pulls in more and more even slowly changing its orbit until it crashes in and becomes a part of the big planet. Just like our space junk in orbit around Earth at some point, "crash in".

[@spaceman9599]

Nicely explained.

[@michaelslack4937]

If Pluto were still a planet then this anomaly could be the Sumerian planet X...or the 10th planet. Interesting, thank you for posting.

[@brandstradamus]

Eris is larger than Pluto, yet still a dwarf planet.

[@tabularasa9554]

It was on purpose. To discredit the ancients.

[@FRproductions888]

@@brandstradamusEris is actually smaller, by a bit

[@Gatorg146]

​@@FRproductions888by 27%

[@thatguywithoutadoubt]

you mean more massive?​@@brandstradamus

[@Healer69420]

Now,imagine after we discover planet 9 it's Orbit will be odd,Leading us to find planet 10

[@adcraziness1501]

which leads us to find planet 11, which leads us to find solar system 2

[@NeilChristian-rj9vv]

​@@adcraziness1501 solar system is probably alpha centuari to be honest

[@Gatorg146]

does it have 3 stars​@@NeilChristian-rj9vv

[@SillyCerealBox]

"I've spent billions of years alone. Maybe I had a name but forgot. Maybe I simply never had one, but you can call me, Planet X"

[@PsychoticWolfie]

It should be noted that the actual researchers themselves as well as the studies directly and continuously caution that, while there seems to be some sort of anomaly, we can't exactly pinpoint what, where, or if it even actually exists or is just an anomaly caused by our lack of knowledge and imaging of what's in the Oort Cloud, or something else. It's even theorized it could be a sub-stellar-mass black hole, which is science's way of saying "we don't actually know what the heck it is, or anything about it really. It looks like it could be here, or there. It could be this, or that, or nothing. We don't know yet, and it's not getting much clearer" Then, the media does what it always does, secondhand and thirdhand "study peddlers" rehash and regurgitate the original studies with blatant misinformation sprinkled throughout it, and voila, you get this video. Seriously, this exact issue has been raised and debunked several times in the past, and while MORE data has been collected, it doesn't show anything new and we're still just as in the dark about the whole thing as we were to begin with, just with more theories debunked now, but still no actual answers. And the video titles and articles and "studies" are getting more and more sensational, and skewing the actual scientific method and process like the media machine always loves to. It's ridiculous honestly. It's something actual scientists constantly have to fight against to keep bias and misinformation from degrading their search for the actual facts, regardless of what anyone really really really wants them to be or not. See, there's a GLARING issue here (literally) that not too many people talk about, because they don't take the time to actually LEARN and try to understand the science, they just regurgitate what they hear without understanding the meaning behind it. We didn't discover pluto until relatively recently (1930) because of its distance from the sun, combined with its relatively small size. BUT since 1930, we have created technologies and methods that can find and even image planets around other stars, albeit mostly only around our close neighbors. With our infrared telescopes and methods from last decade or earlier, even ground based ones, we could easily detect a pluto-sized and temperatured object at the edge of our solar system even. This is because even the tiniest and coldest planetoid still produces a small infrared glow, and with enough observation with enough exposure or a composite image, you would see it at practically any distance it could orbit the sun with the stuff we have today. We're not seeing anything where the media wants us to say we see a massive planet. It's just not there. All we are observing is gravitational perturbations that we legitimately cannot pinpoint the source of EVER, until we first solve the 3-body problem. That's the second half of the big issue that nobody's talking about with this. There are so many variables at play here, it's more than a 1000 body problem. The complexities in the system and gravitational interactions are far more intricate than our simplified models predict, and there are too many variables to create an accurate equation in a human lifetime because it would be so large (you would actually have to factor in each individual object, small or large, in the entire solar system, into the equation individually to get a truly accurate working equation) So we can't even say what the data that we're seeing means with any reasonable amount of certainty at any point soon. Maybe in several more years we will actually have something that you can make a video on, or an answer to what's causing the anomaly at the very least (probably not a planet)

[@PsychoticWolfie]

This isn't even touching the fact that the data itself is not consistent. It's appeared to change over the years, as I've stated this idea of any substantial planet beyond the orbit of Pluto has been raised and debunked numerous times, only to be raised again, and debunked again, and so on. I don't mean, "the data has shifted slowly in a circular motion around the sun like a distant planet orbiting" kind of changing. I mean that the data says it's over here, no it's over there! It's this big, no it's that big! Wait, it's gone. Now it's back! And this is because certain people are looking at this pseudo-random data and seeing patterns that aren't there. Some of these pseudo-random patterns can appear similar to others, so some think that this means something is there. Well, it does! The combined gravitational effects and pushing and shoving and jostling of 8 major planets including 2 large gas giants, and trillions of smaller things including moons, asteroids, comets, and planetoids and dwarf planets (which we have many of by the way) And people for some reason think it's weird when gravity clumps up on one side more than the other, even when >70% of the solar system's non-solar mass can be on one side of the solar system sometimes. Like they don't understand how freaking barycenters work, and those chumps call themselves astrophysicists lol Sorry kinda bitter about that aspect of the community, just gets under my skin when stuff is overlooked that easily.

[@blamehypocrisy.4053]

@PsychoticWolfie You forgot the most important step to all this. Arrogant and ignorant assholes (you) get to makes comments

[@Ludak021]

Ah, Nibiru all over again, just moved a little bit and none of our satellites or millions of telescopes can see it.

[@rationalmuscle]

Yeah, but aliens.

[@camielkotte]

Fascinating. Great vid! The number of 11400 years is awkwardly scaring . Just 11800 years ago marks a significant time period for earth temperature. Very interested to follow this subject. Cheers.

[@marioserafin3177]

Was thinking the same thing.

[@perhapsyes2493]

Younger Dryas

[@camielkotte]

@@perhapsyes2493 yes, I ve seen Randall Carlson's sacred geometry. It's old but fascinating. Includes positioning of ancient ruins to celestial objects aswell as sizes and speed of celestial objects.

[@smgdfcmfah]

Except that if this is correct, then this planet would be in almost the same place in its orbit as it was at the peak of the last ice age - which I don't think is the case. I think their attempt at a return time is little more than a guess, but if there's any truth to this theory, it could definitely play havoc with our planetary climate (orbit, lunar orbit, tilt - all sorts of things).

[@camielkotte]

@@smgdfcmfahalso, i recently learned about Milankovich cycles. They are accepted as a reoccurring event as it appears.

[@judy1879]

Why isn't James Webb checking it out 🤔??

[@Markaras]

It is not as bright as other planets, it is far away from its star

[@skipslone7237]

Webb observes in infrared. Any planet this far out would reflect little to no light in the infrared parts of the spectrum.

[@jgrab1]

@@skipslone7237 Webb doesn't *only* observe in infrared. The real reason is JWST is not optimized for searching for unknown targets at an unknown location (particularly close up), it will mainly be pointed at a location where scientists know/suspect a planet is orbiting a star, or where scientists expect to see ancient galaxies/stars emitting a lot of infrared light. Using JWST to search for planet X would be a waste of it's time. The Vera C Rubin Observatory, on the other hand, will survey the sky every night, producing an extremely comprehensive and detailed report of any small change in brightness or position of many many thousands (maybe millions?) of objects in the night sky. If planet X exists, Vera C Rubin is much better suited to possibly detecting it.

[@brandstradamus]

Who says they haven't.

[@thebear6123]

I just put a highly contagious bacteria in the middle of the Atlantic ocean, here take this microscope and go find it. The scale we are dealing with here makesnit difficult to spot or locate. We only know about exo planets because they pass between Earth and their home star, dimming the star.

[@dexseesall9828]

Planet nine is thousands of years old not 2016. First talked about in Sumerian texts along with the Anunnaki. Its also referred to as the "Destroyer" in the Kolbrin Bible. Another set of ancient texts.

[@KJames2345]

Your talking about Nibiru, which isn't part of our solar system, it belongs to a brown dwarf star system, know as the sun's evil twin called Nemesis.

[@dexseesall9828]

@@KJames2345 according to Zacharia Sitchen 12th Planet, Niburu IS actually part of our solar system on a highly accentuated orbit of approximately 25,000 years. The planet IS said to be orbiting a brown dwarf closely , which explains the Annunaki' ability to survive there. In the Kolbrin bible, it is known as the 'destroyer'. A massive planet (but without a brown dwarf companion) in a highly accentuated orbit around our sun. In both instances the planets described ARE described as part of our solar system in highly accentuated orbits. My point is a new large undiscovered planet has been talked about for thousands of years.

[@normanburns-ko4ro]

Nibiru is a Brown Dwarf with five planets orbiting it. It was on Google Space about 4 years ago but was blacked out. Was in the star cluster of Taurus. And headed our way. No telling how close it is now. Hundreds of thousands of years ago it destroyed the planet Tiamat, in between Mars and Jupiter I believe. However that is how we got the Asteroid Belt.

[@mroldhat3309]

Read the Earth Cronicles by Zachariah Sitchen.

[@owlcowl]

No, don't.

[@jalesvevajayamare7198]

Planetary discovery plays an important role in the development of technology and science. Space missions to study these planets, such as the Mars Rover and the Juno spacecraft orbiting Jupiter, have driven innovation in technology, including heat-resistant materials, long-distance communications techniques, and automated control systems. These advances are not only useful for space exploration but also have broad applications on Earth 😘🥰😘🥰😘🥰

[@KSoreolord]

It's planet 10 because Pluto is still a planet, scientists are just ashamed and embarrassed that Pluto is so small. Planet 9 is Pluto, Planet X is planet 10! Get your facts straight!

[@ruth4thetruth334]

This is how I learned to memorize the solar system when I was a kid. Martha Visits Every Monday And Just Stays Until Noon Period. Without Pluto it will just be a run on sentence. Lol

[@tonywgt]

Poor Pluto. You were an inspiration for years

[@jannatrizwan2014]

It's All Fun And Games Until Some Random Alien Says They Found Planet 9 With Their Spaceship

[@galaxy_lord218]

True

[@ReggieArford]

.... and lays claim to it, in the name of their Emperor.

[@EmpEroR_SuRTuR]

So comes the destroyer, NIBIRU, planet of the crossing, the great red dragon!!!

[@jo_momma3270]

😳👍🏻👍🏻Yup!!! You got it right!!

[@JimSmith-g8c]

Bullshit.

[@-wotiu_77]

Nasa was seemingly unconcerned about its appearance in our Solar System, strange yes ...

[@gaureearolkar1522]

when we plan out of solar system projects like voyager, new horizon, etc do they show any inconsistentancy in their orbit due to planet 9? can this help in finding planet 9 position?

[@billytollerton4220]

Skywatch media news ,is a great channel for all things nibiru,or planet x.

[@kingjames1586]

This planet was verified by the head of U.S. naval observatory in early 80’s.

[@jrberg327]

Yes Harrington from JPL let it slip out. But they may have had a earlier date of discovery as it seems the Voyager spacecraft picked up this object, which was said to set off alarm bells and freaked out a lot of people.

[@kingjames1586]

@@jrberg327 correct 👍

[@regobertofernandez1478]

It is Planet Nibiru, becomes closer every 3,600 years.

[@BassBashin]

Man there are a lot of Jerry Smiths in here

[@wes3044]

😅

[@hook-x6f]

He stay down by the liquor sto' cross from the barber shop.

[@johnmcnulty4425]

For those that think Pluto should still be a planet consider this: since Pluto is significantly smaller than our own Moon, should the Earth be considered a double planetary system?

[@Miloren987_13]

I think the name "elipsia" would be great for planet 9 bc of the predicted elliptical orbit.

[@junegemini7021]

How come we can take pix of nebulas ,galaxies millions of LY away but can't get a click of something in the outer reaches of our solar system?

[@CrotchGoblin446]

I think it's the equivalent of taking binoculars and looking at something really close to you. Hubble/James Webb might not be 'near sighted'. Or the earth is flat and all the space stuff is one big conspiracy..

[@Mulberrysmile]

Space is big. Space is dark. We find things because they emit light, block light, or reflect light, and also by “surveys” of pieces of sky. They also look for other things than light, like different radio signals, but let’s focus on the visible (to us) spectrum. Go to Google Earth and find Turks and Caicos Islands. Some are tiny dots, yet they have towns. Zoom out the town disappears, then the island does. It takes 1.3 million Earths to fill the sun. The sun isn’t huge. There are stars more than 900 times larger in diameter. We’re about 35 million miles from Mars at closest points in our orbits, and 250 million miles when we’re on opposite sides of the sun. If you could put lots of Earths side by side on a line from us to Mars when it’s at its closest point, it would take 4375 earths. So are you getting an idea of how big space is? If a planet is out there and not reflecting light, it’s just a speck of darkness in the darkness. You have to have an idea of where to look for it, and you have to hope it travels to block out a star while you’re looking at that particular piece of sky. Pluto, at its closest, is 2,660,000,000 miles away from us. With Earth having just under a diameter of 8,000 miles, it would take 332,500 side by side in row to reach Pluto. Telescopes are made to focus out at the things in the distant sky. To try to focus closer just doesn’t work well. It’s like trying to take a photo of a hair on a flea on your dog with a telephoto lens while sitting with your dog on your lap. But even with telescopes made to see closer to Earth, they only see a small piece of sky. And there aren’t many of them, so scientists have to request time to use them for the things they are studying. And this is why they are trying to study the orbits of the things they know are there. Disturbances in an orbit happen because something is tugging from another direction. But they have to account for the nearby planets, as well as how distances change as all our solar system bodies are in motion. Hope this helps.

[@bb5242]

it's dark out there

[@swinde]

These objects are much larger that even a giant planet like Jupiter, and they emit light

[@tinypurplefishesrunlaughin8052]

I like turtles

[@reiviropuppyz]

imagine all the solarballs fan are here

[@SillyCerealBox]

Well I'm here !

[@ericberman4193]

Planet 9 just likes its privacy, that’s all!

[@thepirate_kinz1509]

Planet Nibiru? Is Billy Carson right?

[@Danisveryfreaky]

I love Pluto so much since I've been a space enthusiast, but just admit that it's a dwarf planet because it doesn't met the 3rd requirement criteria of being a planet, at least there's "planet" in the "drawf planet"

[@JeffDearman]

its planet NIBIRU

[@ryananderson5202]

Leftys bring it up every so often to get people looking ar the stars while they crush society.

[@SilverSin]

Nibiru. If you want to know who the Anunnaki are, just look in the mirror.

[@nicoleackerman205]

It is us nooooooooo! Clue Planet of the Apes music

[@erickvallad4189]

😂

[@kennethbair2136]

You are correct but not fully.we are a mixture only part annanuki dns.

[@kennethbair2136]

Scoffers will soon be trembling , strong men shall become faint.

[@dustynmiller2497]

U2😊

[@djentlemanb]

There's ancient carvings and mentions of this planet in Sumerian history along with other civilizations

[@WadeB-t2l]

No there isn't. That is made up. I used to believe that until I learned more.

[@servicesthankyou4032]

I think it's Beetlejuice honestly it's between 4 and 8 a astronomical units Beetlejuice between 650 to 640 ...... years away.... makes since DO THE MATH ....

[@servicesthankyou4032]

❤

[@KJames2345]

What about Betelgeuse 😂

[@verppurp]

And that’s a star not a planet

[@ssjfroku]

Is this Planet X or Planet nibiru? I remember talking about this a long time ago back in 2012 and some time before. This is old news. But back then it was a conspiracy and we were getting called crazy for it.

[@cloudflex4819]

Anunnaki ?

[@Megatron7109]

Cant wait for planet 9 And cant wait to see how much time will it take to change every single solar system diagram I AM EXCITED🎉

[@jeninlight]

To add a tiny dot on an already not even remotely to scale diagram? 🤣

[@hellskitchen10036]

I saw Planet 9 from outer Space at the movies in 1959.

[@Creepermanp]

Planet 28* explanation most of the planets in the solar system are dwarf planets there are 8 planets in this solar system that aren't a dwarf planet while 19 of the planets in this solar system are dwarf planets.

[@McLaughlinP-y1c]

How do we know the meteor that killed the dinosaurs wasn't planet Xs own moon

[@MrTonyHeath]

Do hold your breath.

[@EmpEroR_SuRTuR]

It's the tenth planet NIBIRU, home world of the annunaki, told to us by ancient sumerian tablets. It is also known as the destroyer because when it passes near the earth catastrophic events occur 😢

[@Shadowkey392]

Don’t start that debunked conspiracy nonsense again.

[@EmpEroR_SuRTuR]

@@Shadowkey392 it's never been debunked, your fear is not letting you recognize the truth, not just sumerian tablets, but the kolbren bible speaks of this planet, the evidence is right their if your not to scared to admit it 😂😂🤣🤣😂😂

[@jeremy-cb2nn]

​@@Shadowkey392They can't help themselves. It's a sickness.

[@ameliawarfield5637]

When the astronomers finally do find Planet Nine,I hope they have a good name for it.

[@تاريخالرومان]

Doom bringer

[@XxxXxx-dc3ud]

Nibiru? 😂

[@michaels.starnes194]

Nibiru

[@FatEngineerGaming]

Erebus, after the god of darkness.

[@ameliawarfield5637]

@@FatEngineerGaming That's a good name 📛.

[@timothychung4811]

There was an object that was caught from one of the satellite sucking plasma at around the 7:00 o'clock position in 2015. It dwarfed any planet we have.

[@RADARTechie]

Oh god, Zachariah szichin, or however you spell it, was right?

[@owlcowl]

No.

[@jody2873]

Math didn't think itself up...a Mind thought math up

[@stephenphillips4984]

No. Math IS mind in action. Logic cannot be created or thought up. It just IS.

[@jody2873]

Disagree - 'nothing' can't create 'something'. Nothing creates nothing because it's "nothing". That's simple logic.

[@jody2873]

Logic can only be understood by humans because of a set of standards prethought up to process from.

[@Ettenyl56jioni]

Agreed, something can never emerge from nothing. Even in math, 0x0 or 0+0 = 0. So even math itself proves that math can only proceed from a mind as a first cause.

[@Ettenyl56jioni]

@@_NicBP How do you define your own "understanding"? Do you imply that what you "understand" is inherently correct?

[@mkogrady6078]

Just curious if James Webb space telescope has the ability to see if number 9 exists

[@Brenton-xc2fg]

it probably could but it would have to know exactly where to look which is difficult, the nancy roman telescope will probably be better for that as it covers a much wider field of view, set to release in 2027

[@Brenton-xc2fg]

but it also depends how much light the planet is reflecting which probably isn’t much which makes it even more difficult

[@Dr.Frankensteen]

James Webb is better equipped to view far distance objects so theoretically it could if Planet Nine (X) if it's pretty far out.

[@jeremy-cb2nn]

No. It was designed to stare out into the cosmos not look for a dark object nearby.

[@hellskitchen10036]

I saw Planet 9 from outer Space at the movies in 1959.

[@FourthMatrix]

Tiny black hole, or maybe just a chunk of super compact mass? Just my silly thoughts..

[@minister521]

Nibiru & the Anunnaki . . . . So when is it expected to be seen?

[@annm4833]

Number 9 belongs to Pluto so this would have to be 10 or Planet X..🪐💫✨🔭

[@mpmpm]

That's 'just' nostalgia. If Pluto is a planet, then other objects like Eris are also a planet. Sure, we could agree to that. But then we 'need' a new definition for 'planet'.

[@OmenAkumaru20223]

@@mpmpm You are a baka... BECAUSE Pluto only got downgraded: 1) because some researchers wanted the prestige of their names in so-called science papers, and the ALL the accolades that go with that... 2) And also BECAUSE the North American Space Agency [NASA] people refuse to acknowledge that Pluto was once a larger planet, & the debris near it belongs to the LARGER planet that Pluto was eons before telescopes were ever invented.

[@Gordon-r4h]

There were 12planets, 2were destroyed,

[@DisconnectedYoutube]

Oh yeah go ahead and include Eris, Haumea, Gonggong, Orcus, Sedna, Makemake and Ceres. Maybe Vesta and Charon while you're at it.

[@Gordon-r4h]

@@DisconnectedKZbin I think you missed out buttercup ..🤭..

[@אליאלבן-דן]

Its name is Nabiru.

[@stevensmith797]

planet 9 is based on actual evidence , nabiru is based in fantasy , 2 very diferent things

[@אליאלבן-דן]

@@stevensmith797 Proper nouns are always capitalized.

[@SSRyder84]

Nabiru? I was wondering the same thing...@stevensmith797 doesn't all science start with a theory?

[@hook-x6f]

@@SSRyder84 Damn straight and not only that but without imagination we couldn't plan for tomorrow or determine consequences or learn at all. Imagination is everything because knowledge is limited. Einstein said this not me.

[@morganoverbay8783]

Something terrifying is happening around Uranus!!

[@ColdSid]

Damn chipotle

[@MikeS-um1nm]

Is it an asteroid or a hemmo roid?

[@ChristurnbullllubnrutsirhC]

I'm blocking the memories

[@luisfilipelopes2900]

What do you mean, terrifying? To us? To the solar system, to Uranus? And could you shed some light in theories?

[@j.w.r3730]

Hold my beer...

[@penoge]

According to the Bible and ancient Egyptian depictions our solar system consists of 12 planets. The Akkadian cylinder seal VA-243 shows 11 planets (including Tiamat and Apzu which according to the Enuma Elish were destroyed) and some unidentified objects.

[@michaeltarnowski4242]

Why do you say the Bible makes such a statement?

[@penoge]

@@michaeltarnowski4242 Because of Genesis 37, 9 and Revelation 12, 1

[@DarkHeartofBlackmoor]

IF planet 9 exists and it is highly elliptical and moving extremely slow. When it becomes visible as it approaches the inner planets, how long will it be with us and how disruptive will it be to the climates and rotations of the inner planets?

[@theJackaldeal]

The Sumerian have it on their carving of the solar system . It makes me think it's out there . Plus other historical records mentioning it

[@hook-x6f]

hey cool i want to learn more about that. Tripped out to that antarctica was on older maps.

[@plessis2023]

always hear sun should have a binary object with it. what if that binary object is brown dwarf? it would be hard to see due to its color .

[@verppurp]

Whoever told you that is stupid cause I’m 99% sure that a brown dwarf would’ve been discovered by now if that were true

[@AmbientMaze]

So did we all forget that is supposedly nemesis the red dwarf star?

[@nicoleackerman205]

Brown dwarf.

[@TheMrGoodgamer]

If it was a red dwarf, that close to us, it would be EASELY visible to us.

[@AmbientMaze]

@@TheMrGoodgamer no it wouldn’t that bc in space time close isn’t close at all

[@AmbientMaze]

@@TheMrGoodgamer plus you don’t know where to look at all

[@AmbientMaze]

@@TheMrGoodgamer and in order to see light emitted from red dwarf you need infrared

[@howardhudson5475]

I've been hearing about this discovry since i was a boy in the 1960's. I'll believe it when I see it through my telescope.

[@melissamullins3564]

We aren’t talking about Pluto. This is a whole binary star system with its planets and moons and all