Thrust Vectoring F18 Hornet |The NASA Dryden HARV Project

Thrust Vectoring - on an F18 Hornet! The Story of the NASA Dryden HARV Project:
The F-18 HARV or High Alpha Research Vehicle was a NASA testbed used to study performance at high angles of attack or alpha. The aircraft flew from 1989 to 1996 in a 3 phased research program that progressively added modifications to the Hornet. Let's take a look at the specifications of the F-18 HARV
Specifications
Length: 56 FT (17.1 M)
Height: 10 FT 6 IN (3.2 M) AT CANOPY
Wingspan: 37 FT 5 IN (11.4M)
Maximum speed: initially Mach 1.8 (1,190 MPH/1,915 KMH), subsonic with later modifications
Phase 1 weight: 31,980 LB, WITH 6,480 LB OF INTERNAL FUEL 14,506 KG / 2939 KG
Phase 2 and 3 weight: 36,099 LB ALSO WITH 6,480 LB OF INTERNAL FUEL 16,374 KG / 2939KG
Engines: Thrust Class
Each General Electric
EACH F404-GE-400 turbofan engines,
each producing 16,000 LB of thrust 71.17 kN WITH afterburner.
Subscribe on Patreon: / pilotphotog
Patrons and channel members get early access to ad free videos
Follow me on other social media:
📸 Instagram - / pilotphotog
📖Facebook - / pilotphotog
🐦Twitter - / pilotphotog
👾Twitch: / pilotphotog
🎮 Discord: / discord
The aircraft that would become the F-18 HARV was actually a pre production F/A-18 and the sixth one ever built. Having been assigned Bureau Number 160780, this particular F18 was chosen as a testbed because it had a spin chute installed as the NAVY had used it to evaluate spin performance and recovery. Under NASAs use the aircraft was designated number 840.
The HARV program was a joint effort between NASA's Dryden, Ames, Langley and Lewis research centers. By the time NASA received the aircraft, it had been cannibalized for spare parts so extensively by the Navy it was assumed that the aircraft would never fly again. In fact, the engineers cataloged 400 missing parts and virtually no documentation of the existing wiring system. To get 840 airworthy, the mechanics and technicians had to cut out the existing wiring, find substitute parts, assemble and rewire the aircraft. By the time they were done, the words "Silk Purse" were painted on the fuselage, a take on the expression you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
Credits/Attributions:
"The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement."
Footage and stills:
NASA Dryden Research Flight Center
www.nasa.gov/centers/armstron...
DCS World HARV Skin:
www.digitalcombatsimulator.co...
F22 and F35 footage courtesy of Lockheed Martin:
www.lockheedmartin.com/
HARV Museum Photos courtesy of Rod Bearden:
Rodbearden.com
#F18 #HARV #NASA
Music from filmmusic.io "Hiding Your Reality" by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) License: CC BY (creativecommons.org/licenses/b...)
This video is an opinion editorial commentary.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use purposes such as criticism, commentary, parody, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
All works used in this video (Images, audio etc) belong to their respective authors
(This does not include the audio commentary or licensed BGM).
avgeek supercruise x31

[@theScottishKoala]

I’ve seen Australian Hornets sitting at 50 degrees, almost hovering as they flew over us maintaining perfectly... Can’t even imagine what 70 degrees would look like, that’s nuts!

[@pottierkurt1702]

Fancy seeing you here Mr Scottish Koala explains .

[@PilotPhotog]

@thescottishKoala I tried flying 50 degrees in DCS...fun and challenging! Thanks for commenting and looking forward to a collab!

[@LeoPira]

True, 50 degrees is eye catching, 70 degrees is nuts, but what is really mind blowing is the reported X29 89 degrees!!!!

[@williamjr5825]

Crazy how Americans research thrust vectoring and never apply it on their aircraft until the f22 but good for Russia they don’t need to research anything just let the Americans do the experiment we just apply it to our jet

[@LeoPira]

William Jr There’s an old aviation adage that while the americans take years planing, projecting, developing; other countries are using it!

[@scottydudley5700]

I have over 1500 hours in the Hornet, beginning in 1982. Some of the maneuvers I have seen in recent air show footage, the high alpha regime has indeed been expanded. Due no doubt to the testing performed at Edwards. We used to routinely fly to what was then relatively high alpha. We obviously had only touched on the full capabilities of the Hornet. Thanks for this video. Made an old geezer remember the good ole days.

[@hughjass3266]

Nice

[@joshschneider9766]

​@@hughjass3266 just being able to trap onto a carrier makes you a beast of a pilot air, but that many hours makes you a true badass. Much respect from a former civil Air Patrol cadet.

[@JosephArata]

They took this data and applied it to the F-22 project 2 decades later. The F-22 doesn't have 360° thrust vectoring, instead it uses two independent vertical thrust vectoring nozzles. It allows them to use thrust vectoring for fast roll maneuvers, or crazy pitch up or down maneuvering. It also doesn't prevent them from being able to go supersonic.

[@MrDJAK777]

And combined with the massive fucking rudders and high T/W achieves the same maneuverability as 3d+ canards.

[@chadnelson1777]

Yep it’s called 2D thrust vectoring

[@FLMKane]

Yeah um that makes no sense... This plane flew AFTER the yf22.

[@bluemarlin8138]

@@chadnelson1777Interestingly, the Ruzzians also use 2D thrust vectoring. They just vector the engines at a 45° angle to simulate 3D vectoring. The F-15 ACTIVE and the F-16 with thrust vectoring used true 360° nozzles which the Ruzzians couldn’t replicate.

[@maybe4549]

I'd still love to see an F18 with thrust vectoring. I think it would basically make it into the American SU37

[@Y13A]

You’re definitely right, it was a golden age for these experimental aircraft back then! Makes me wonder what kinds of experimental projects they’re researching nowadays. On a completely unrelated note, for the Ace Combat fans out there, this era was likely the inspiration for AC7’s EASA, and Mihaly’s Su-30SM. The orange wingtip paint scheme, dry lakebed test facility, and even the Worm logo are extremely similar. Also another interesting note - the CFA-44 Nosferatu design has a converge nozzle inside the three paddle thrust vectoring module, which explains why it’s capable of supersonic speeds.. they really thought things out for the design! Anyway sorry for going off topic but thanks for making this video, really interesting topic! I remember seeing the black F-18 HARV on a poster that I got from an air show at Ames back in 2003. So glad to finally get to learn a lot more about the design. Thank you!

[@PilotPhotog]

Glad you enjoyed the video and thank you for the excellent points on the Ace Combat crossover...I am planning on livestreaming through an Ace Combat 7 play through and AC related videos in the future. Stay tuned!

[@nickkorkodylas5005]

CNN after reading praise to Russian technology: _"ORANGE WINGTIP BAD!"_ Political commentary aside: XFA-27 and CFA-44 were my favourite Ace Combat designs because they seemed well thought and relatively realistic. It's a shame the Falken and especially the Wyvern have become the most iconic fictional planes in the franchise when the first seems barely capable to lift-off with its abysmal wing area and the later would cramble apart at g 5 with its retarded retractable reverse wing design.

[@setsunatellem]

An F/A-18E with HARV technology and a railgun sounds like my default setting. ;)

[@DonVigaDeFierro]

@@nickkorkodylas5005 Funnily enough, the Falken is capable of flying on the X-plane aerodynamic simulation... But yes. Most of the original aircraft are the classical case of "function follows form".

[@nickkorkodylas5005]

@@DonVigaDeFierro Funnily enough, the Falken is based on an existing design. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PZL-230_Skorpion It's just that the real one was planned as a light CAS-aircraft and not a supermaneuverable dogfighter (and the engines did not stupidly protrude way past the wing/lifting body area).

[@reggieziet]

Being into aviation my whole life, thought I seen them all, Never knew of a TVC F-18, how cool! Now I want to see an TVC Supertomcat...

[@ozzy7763]

Watch Robotech ! Lol

[@reggieziet]

@@ozzy7763 Hahaha seriously, they really made an animation of it? Will check, thanks XD

[@ozzy7763]

IV EV it’s an old Japanese Anime from back when I was a kid ! Lol. Not really a Tomcat but the Veritech was definitely inspired by the Cat ! Lol. You should google Rick Hunters Veritech !

[@DeNihility]

XFA-27

[@reggieziet]

@@ozzy7763 hahahaa will do thanks bud

[@CharlesHuse]

This research looks like the precursor to how the Su-35 and -37 has become so agile.

[@bluemarlin8138]

This aircraft, the F-15 ACTIVE, and the thrust vectoring F-16 were more maneuverable than any Sukhoi, as the basic airframes were better to begin with, and because they developed true 360° thrust vectoring (at least on the F-15) which was superior to what Ruzzia uses. However, the US decided against putting thrust vectoring on future aircraft besides the F-22 (which was already in production), because it tempted pilots to get into turning fights instead of sticking to the US tactics that have been effective since 1942 and continue to be superior.

[@PegasusTenma1]

@@bluemarlin8138 wasn’t the thrust vectoring on the F-16 MATV better? It was also 360° and performed the kulbit and flatspin maneuvers effortlessly.

[@naj5338]

@@PegasusTenma1not sure but it sure could have been.

[@KWillyzz1]

Imagine the type of experimental aircraft they're testing in 2020

[@karlsinger4760]

Maneuverability isn't as important in the age of stealth. Don't expect much

[@LKN117]

@@karlsinger4760 hate to tell you but you are very wrong in that regard. Stealth does not make you invisible and the Air Force as well as aircraft manufacturers know this. Maneuverability in regards to fighters and multi-roll future air craft is still key.

[@4rsh193]

Its just AC7

[@oxcart4172]

Probably nothing with a pilot onboard😐😐

[@aryanbhuta3382]

The U.S. Air Force announced they tested a prototype of a 6th generation fighter yesterday.

[@texhaines9957]

Great info that my kids, one in the Navy, didn't know. Now they will. Their WW2 Grandpa was with P47s. Thanks

[@PilotPhotog]

Thank your kids for their service and I plan a video all about the P-47, hopefully it will do their grandpa proud. Thanks for commenting and glad you enjoyed the video.

[@jocax188723]

Don't forget the F-16 CCV/AFTI! That thing could yaw like a racecar and freak everybody out.

[@PilotPhotog]

Indeed! I plan on a VISTA video and depending on how much source material I can find will either include the CCV/AFTI as a separate video or combine them. Thanks for commenting and for being a subscriber!

[@hedgehog3180]

I really appreciate that you show units in metric and imperial, it really helps me to actually understand what's being talked about.

[@PilotPhotog]

Thank you glad to do that and thanks for commenting!

[@Troubleshooter125]

I hadn't even heard of the HARV until an earlier video where you discussed it in brief. This was an excellent overview of what was clearly a critical program in the development of the US's fifth generation fighter aircraft. Many thanks!

[@drheusmann805]

I've been here watching your journey when it comes to these types of videos. Very informative and educational! They've helped me consider whether or not on joining the Air Force, Navy, or Marine Corps to become a pilot. I hope your success can lead to more people to understand the majesty of these great aircraft!

[@susanartigas7498]

What a terrific video. Can't wait for the next one. Excellent research. Thank you!

[@shotigerola4065]

I've been waiting for this! Your channel is really great and reliable! 🙏🏼

[@chestercallahan8856]

Your videos about these more obscure aircraft are truly gems!

[@PilotPhotog]

Thank you, glad you enjoy them!

[@corey8420]

Amazing video, thank you for taking the time to explain the physics and history behind the jet. I always lean something new from every video

[@jamesbarker5254]

Great video Ive been waiting for this video since you asked if we would watch it and let me say you didnt disappoint. Awesome job.

[@SahanModelbuilding]

Great video, there are so many interesting planes I didn’t know about

[@PilotPhotog]

Glad you enjoyed it and more on the way!

[@john4reel135]

Great job dude. So much hard work was obviously put into this and is appreciated. Please keep more coming

[@PilotPhotog]

Thank you much appreciated!

[@Aspen51]

Outstanding piece of work man - keep this up Sir

[@blaineadams7484]

Great job again! Been looking forward to this video. I've been watching videos on the x planes for years but I don't remember ever seeing a video on this aircraft. Thank you

[@RickSolid1]

Another great one! Info dense, well thought out, straightforward. These NASA demo planes are inspired and you do such a good job.

[@mxcollin95]

Absolutely loving your channel! Fascinating stuff! You’re covering stuff I’ve never seen anyone else cover. 👍

[@robertemery8660]

I'm really glad I found this channel I enjoy all your videos can't wait for the next one

[@majr72]

Great video, I remember watching this a/c taking off during that time out at Edwards AFB. Being stationed out at Edwards AFB was amazing being able to see A/C most don’t ever get to see fly.

[@brianmerz4810]

i cant wait, love your work!!

[@solarfinder]

High quality content bud. I love the videos and detail you provide. Thank you for what you do, it's appreciated!

[@PilotPhotog]

Glad you enjoy it!

[@swaghauler8334]

By following your normal subscriber progression, I'd say here comes 20K subscribers! You earned that for sure. Good job sir!

[@thumb-ugly7518]

Thank you for your work. I love these experimental aircraft. They really make me wonder about the future. Please keep doing this.

[@PilotPhotog]

Thanks, will do and glad you enjoyed the video!

[@michaelhowell8489]

Outstanding job! Loved it! Encore, encore!!😂👍👁👁🇺🇸

[@markelliott585]

Greetings from Colorado! More please-all of your ideas. This was FAscinating. Thank you.

[@steveeisenburger6011]

Yay! You got it out Nice mate. Good job. Loved it. Look forward to that F16. Didn't know about that one either. Salivating

[@mauricebarlow6198]

Thank you for making the video also I can't wait to see the F 16 Vista video.

[@robfredericks2984]

Former Navy jet pilot, trained in F-9F, A-4H, and crashed in A-3D---well sure! Loved it, just want to know where that technology is NOW for us---I know Russia and China use it.

[@PilotPhotog]

Thanks for your service and looks like you had a great career...glad you survived the A-3D crash...I met someone who flew them as well and he told me the nickname was All Three Dead....ouch!

[@davemingle6743]

Canada has not stopped

[@aussiefan354]

@PilotPhotog Another great video on another great plane mate. Thanks for posting

[@covert0overt_810]

Thanks for the all the awesome content ! Really good stuff..

[@PilotPhotog]

Glad you enjoy it!

[@juanarce6900]

Awesome work from the HARV, and the lessons are priceless; thank you Juan for another great piece of work, and I'll be waiting on the F-16 video!!👍

[@PilotPhotog]

Thanks Juan, and thanks for your ongoing support! Working on the VISTA video as well as the X-32

[@juanarce6900]

@@PilotPhotog Thank you too, I wish I could help the channel but my situation is hard at the moment!!

[@PilotPhotog]

@@juanarce6900 no worries and I immensely appreciate your comments and continued support!

[@jeremystone36]

You did an outstanding job putting this together!

[@PilotPhotog]

Thank you much appreciated!

[@elricofarmer1561]

What a very instructive video! Great information.

[@eugeneetsebeth8499]

awesome. it was the blacksmiths solution to the thrust vectoring problem ....... it got better later but it needed weight to prove it in the beginning, i salute you engineers

[@pj7362]

Love it . Looking forward to the falcon video. Subscribed.

[@mustafahassan3584]

Beautifully made video bro!

[@rudijoris9555]

Great video! Thanks so much.

[@alexandrec9372]

Very good, love your vídeos! Congrats from Brazil!

[@PilotPhotog]

Thank you so much! Greetings from Texas!

[@UrMomsChauffer]

Thanks for this video. Never knew about this plane. The planes on the nose are a very interesting feature.

[@PilotPhotog]

Glad you enjoyed it and thanks for commenting

[@NessNik]

this was cool , thank you

[@andrisxyz2417]

Awesome video again!

[@PilotPhotog]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@phil121269]

Thanks for this fantastic video...

[@andreasleonardo6793]

Amazing video....its too powerful and great abilities of these aircrafts which shows in this video...thanks for sending video...

[@davidb7699]

What a Great Video,,,I seen the short takeoff F - 15 fly at endwards,,,and the SR - 71 ,,,,one of my all time favorites demonstrations was the SR 71 with one engine flyby....keep up the Good Work

[@justplanebill]

Fascinating research. I'm sure they learned a lot from it.

[@baldieman64]

Thank you for this. I remember seeing footage of a fighter doing insane manurers a while back but couldn't recall what the plane was and assumed it was Russian - it wasn't, it was the HARV.

[@randallparker8477]

Your work is awesome on the researching of the HARV (Hornet), every new technology has years of research behind it. We have not been privy to the actual programs for years. Your presentation allowed many to see the evolution to todays gen 6 platforms. When the P-51 design hit the world, it was unheard of... Yea, Top Secret and all that, but the actual designers never got the benefits of years of development. Rushed into production for the war effort, it was found lacking after actual experience of veteran combat pilots, changes were designed and implemented along the way. And the world had the first true air dominance platform. (my humble opinion). Kinda sounds like the F-35... The F-16 was the modern P-51.

[@andreasleonardo6793]

Super nice video of F-18 hornet also other aircrafts which had technical relationship with F- 18 hornet and steps of developing each versions of these air crafts...too interests video thanks....amazing shapes and colours

[@asfanamin1845]

The video is cool as usual

[@teddy.d174]

I’ve always enjoyed all of your videos, however your content keeps getting better and better, you pick some really incredible subjects PilotPhotog! Me: impatiently waiting for F-16 vista video.

[@PilotPhotog]

I appreciate that! I try to get a little better with each video...sourcing footage for the VISTA video and the....X-32 video as well. Stay tuned!

[@jameseverett245]

20 years of working on F18's. I did not know about this aircraft. i have worked alphas to Foxtrots and this was new to me

[@migram4190]

Great coverage!!

[@PilotPhotog]

Thank you!

[@TriMarkC]

That was fascinating!

[@advforops]

Love the F/A 18. Yes please make more videos on the research aircraft for TV.

[@frankambrose878]

Facinating, even as a laymen I love this stuff.

[@scottl.1568]

Sweet paint job!!

[@ilkoderez601]

Great video!

[@phillipnayola]

I cant wait to see your future vids

[@PilotPhotog]

Thank you, new one on Monday with an Eagle pilot who flew in Desert Storm

[@germanflightjunk5221]

Awesome video, awesome plane! And thanks for the metric numbers

[@PilotPhotog]

Thank you, I will include both units of measure from now on...thanks for commenting!

[@germanflightjunk5221]

@@PilotPhotog Appreciate that :)

[@bobgreene2892]

Very impressive presentaton-- full of details which other publications gloss over,. presuming viewer disinterest. That makes your series a definite subscription magnet, and thanks for the effort and investment in quality research.

[@AccFinEco]

Awesome vid!!!!!

[@davidsherman7868]

I'm a bit surprised that someone actually used their brain in regard to using an aircraft, purpose-built, for high angles of attack, for this project.

[@msgtpauldfreed]

In the 90's research was still going Cold War full bore. Edwards was busy as could be. After the collapse of the Soviet Union focus shifted, but still had to address evolving threats.

[@JimmyRussle]

you're surprised that world class NASA engineers and scientists used their brains?

[@zhaov819]

Wow something new to learn everyday!

[@PilotPhotog]

Glad you think so!

[@Red-rl1xx]

Glad this plane is still around!

[@markmullins7990]

Another great video thanks for that all these planes are the reason we have our current and future aircraft like you commented would be nice if the were all at one museum! Not spread out but still it’s nice to see how much research goes into aviation

[@PilotPhotog]

Thanks for watching, and it would be amazing if these were all in one place!

[@zpilot4523]

Liked the video, hoping for a future video on Rutan's ARES project, and its recent resurrection and successor

[@spartan9458]

Awesome video! and I can't wait to see the F-16 Vista, the F-16 is still my favorite plane since childhood. It helped that I saw them fly out from Spangdahlem AFB regularly while I was growing up in Germany (military Family).

[@PilotPhotog]

Thank you and glad you enjoyed the video! I am researching the VISTA now and will have the video out as soon as possible. Thanks for commenting and for being a subscriber!

[@diecastworld7962]

F 16 is kinda boring if compared to F 18 HARV or F 15 STOL/MTD but still F 16 is also one of my favorite aircrafts although not most favorite but still it's exciting

[@gerrycollins9409]

I was a civilian Firefighter at Edwards during that era. I miss being around those programs

[@CG-cw3ps]

Love this guy. I wish you good fortune 🙏

[@PilotPhotog]

Thank you much appreciated!

[@mrchecks17]

Great video sir

[@moshunit96]

Love to see the x29 as well. Great video.

[@PilotPhotog]

Thanks for commenting and I plan on doing all of the X planes, including the 29

[@mavricxx]

Wow, very interesting documentary!

[@PilotPhotog]

Thank you!

[@Zerojquan]

Amazing video. 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

[@waltleinhauser7111]

Good job, can’t wait to see more.

[@PilotPhotog]

Working on it!

[@jasoneade7978]

those back to back handbrake turns by tht pilot in the middle of the video are mindblowing when u consider the year it was

[@ricdoliveira3075]

Thank you! Subscribed!!

[@swaghauler8334]

Annnd we are past 20K subscribers! Congrats Sir!

[@PilotPhotog]

Thank you and thanks for all of your support!

[@robertgarcia6569]

Nice job on a well done overview of the HARV program. I was assigned to this program to help install many of the unique flight test and research components you mentioned. As a side note, NASA almost got the VISTA aircraft to do additional aerodynamic work. Bob

[@PilotPhotog]

Thanks for commenting and I always appreciate your feedback from someone who was there! Can you imagine what NASA could have done with the VISTA?

[@sikrandall83]

I cant wait for the video on the Vista. Hard to find any content on it. Great job bud. 👍

[@PilotPhotog]

Thank you and working on sourcing info and footage.

[@sikrandall83]

@@PilotPhotog thats a tall order im thinking. Look forward to it.

[@chris_hisss]

Fascinating!

[@blaineadams7484]

That time period was fantastic. I was able to visit Edward's in the nineties. It was after the f22 and f23 trials during the c17 trials, the b2 was based there for a bit (couldn't get anywhere near it. The f23 was sitting on the flight early without any security nut there armed guards at the special hanger the b2 was housed. They were also doing some testing on the ac130 as a couple were in the hangar. I missed the x planes though. Thanks for finding these treasures bring back a lot of good memories for me.

[@TomSidProductions]

8:29 perfectly in sync

[@PilotPhotog]

Thank you, much appreciated!

[@richardhenry5858]

Great video. Very cool.

[@PilotPhotog]

Thanks for commenting

[@thebunnisher109]

It looks really cool

[@fery21]

Love for your videos

[@fery21]

May i suggest, for next video, try mig 1.44 or su 47

[@msgtpauldfreed]

F-16 Vista was badass! Saw it too while I was there.

[@randompheidoleminor3011]

So I went on to SimplePlanes and put on a quasi-thrust vectoring system on the stock F-18. Manoeuvrability was indeed excellent, but the thing bled energy faster than a decapitated turkey. Welp, time to add those cool looking strakes I guess.

[@randompheidoleminor3011]

Another thing I should add is that I had the luxury of enlarging the wings to counter the shift in COM in the game, while the chaps of NASA probably had to make do with counterweights irl.

[@PilotPhotog]

Good point and thanks for commenting, let me know how those strakes work out.

[@nickkorkodylas5005]

_>the thing bled energy faster than a decapitated turkey_ An understatement, "the thing bled energy faster than a Super Hornet" would be a more accurate comparisson (still beat the F-22 in mock dogfight though).

[@TK-_-421]

This is why F-22s don't use thrust vectoring all the time and why thrust vectoring Sukhois are air show meme planes.

[@nickkorkodylas5005]

@@TK-_-421 t. pre-TOPGUN USN loosing 2 Phantoms for every MiG

[@SOLIDIUS36]

Seems like it was beneficial for the thrust vectoring technology and research.

[@mybestieischloer2401]

awsome,absolutley awsome.

[@maliburallye350]

Excellent information 👌🏻

[@PilotPhotog]

Thank you and thanks for commenting

[@11956cem]

I participated on several of the early testing and each advanced product have recieved a life all their own.

[@jotohomomoto]

WOW that was a pretty informative vid. I’ve always been fascinated with combat aircraft but have barely scratched the surface of learning about them. The more i learn, the more fascinated i become. I wish sometimes i had begun this learning process in my teen years so that i’ may have directed my career path in college to be a Marine Aviator (or any combat aviator). C’est la vie i suppose. Lol but yeah, had no idea about this thrust vectoring research done with the f-18 & also didn’t fully appreciate the limitations that are overcome when TV is part of fighter plane’s profile! 👍🏻

[@anthonybenash3457]

New sub, awesome channel keep it up 👏👏👏

[@PilotPhotog]

Thank you very much!

[@larrysouthern5098]

Great Video!!!!

[@PilotPhotog]

Glad you enjoyed it and thanks for commenting!