Timeline of The Rulers of Serbia

[@Polserb]

Discord server if anybody wanted: discord.com/invite/mhUfSfJjGc Like share and subscribe if you want to boost algorythm

[@goranvukovic1991]

Dobar si, solidan istraživački rad i sviđa mi se kako odgovaraš napaljenim neznalicama i kompleksašima. Veliki pozdrav

[@micahistory]

great video, make more of these

[@andrefarfan4372]

Great work.

[@miki-ex6uj]

Imas veoma dobar kontent samo tako nastavi

[@pavlekaraklajic]

Kosovo is Serbia

[@nadacalo9289]

​@@KENANggSMD Kenan😂

[@drilonmaloku788]

Kosova is Albania

[@pavlekaraklajic]

@@drilonmaloku788 Kosovo is Serbia

[@drilonmaloku788]

@@pavlekaraklajic Keep Dreaming

[@pavlekaraklajic]

@@drilonmaloku788 kid

[@gwynedd4023]

Wow what did you use to make this?

[@Polserb]

vsdc

[@gwynedd4023]

@@Polserb thanks

[@lazarstojanovic6325]

De je Nino Belov, Svevladovići, Oštrivojevići, Svetimirovići? Drugo sve ove sto si naveo pre Stefana Nemanje su bili uglavnom samo knezevi dok smo imali kralja (mozda i cara) na primer Krepimir Oštrivojević Veliki

[@Polserb]

Sve su to dinastije samo iz rada Popa Dukljanina i to uglavno u taj deo koji istorijski se ne prihvata za tačan. Pop Dukljanin u prvoj polovini svog rada brka hronologiju, meša slovene sa Gotima, navodi Svatopluka(vladara Velike Morave) kao Hrvatskog kralja i tako slične stvari koje više liče na legende. Da ne spominjem detaljnije kako je to bio izvor za Crvenu Hrvatsku ili za teoriju da su Hrvati Goti.

[@lazarstojanovic6325]

@@Polserb Goti je stari naziv za Srbe, ukucaj na gugl "Nije bilo seobe Srba na Balkan", imas pdf sve lepo objasnjeno u knjizi

[@lazarstojanovic6325]

Mada Pop Dukljanin uopste nije jedini izvor, tu imas i Orbinija,Andriju Kačića, Djanatonija Bomana itd.

[@Polserb]

@@lazarstojanovic6325 Mavro Orbini ti je iz 17 veka + veliki deo njegovog rada su ti legende to prvo a drugo da svih što si naveo su koristili Dukljaninov rad kao izvor

[@goranvukovic1991]

@@Polserb da u pravu si za većinu stvari, ne treba navoditi izmaštana lupetaranja iz kojih i hrvati i muslimani izvode svoje nakaradne teorije o poreklu. Nesporno je bilo da su se i hrvati doseljavali kao i to da je turčenje hrvata i srba počelo negde u 16 veku tek. Posebno me muslimani oduševljavaju svojim maštanjima o poreklu. Samo nek pokažu grobove svojih kraljeva i jedni i drugi ....... ne treba više. Inače recimo u Hrcegovini postoji grob Vlatka Vukovića i trenitno se pravi plan o konzervaciji.

[@Xind_wind]

W vid bro thanks I needed this!

[@Mateja642]

Odlično odrađen video, nego zanima me kakvo mišljenje imaš o teoriji da su Srbi autohtoni narod Balkana, da je to neka "zabranjena istorija Srba" i ljudima koji to potvrđuju, poput Aleksandra Šargića i Aleksandra Mitića sa kanala Srbija Global?

[@Polserb]

ne verujem u autohtonizam i imam par razloga

[@Mateja642]

Kao na primer?

[@milosmladenovic2661]

@@Mateja642 Zato što je to apsolutno velika budalaština i istorijski dokazi pokazuju suprotno

[@Polserb]

@@Mateja642 na primer korišćenje Popa Dukljanina kao dokaz za dinastije Svevladovića Oštroilovića etc a medjuvremenom Pop Dukljanin sam spominje prelaz preko Dunava i seobu u Dalmaciju i u okolini Soluna. Mogu da dam još primera ako treba

[@planelsmederevo3705]

@@Polserb Ponavljam, Letopis popa dukljanina je najverovatnije falsifikat kao i Pofirogenitov spis o doseljavanju srba. Evo ti čist primer. Kada je počeo rat u Ukrajini navodno j našoj prapostojbini komšinica koja je ukrajinka i dugo živi kod nas muku je imala da preseli najbližu rodbinu privremeno kod sebe. Zamisli samo kako se u 7.veku čitav narod seli, šta sve oni i koliko stvari treba da ponesu de bi preživeli do prve žetve u novoj zemlji. Kako da steri i deca prežive to još prolazeći kroz tuđe negostoljubive teritorije. Pa to je buraz prava budalaština.

[@retardiranekifle590]

Mogu li iskoristiti video za tiktok ostavicu u opisu tvoj kanal?

[@Polserb]

Možeš, još ako oćeš daj negde dole malim tekstom credit ali ako staviš u opis onda ok

[@milosmladenovic2661]

Dobar video

[@Bosniak803]

How is it that,there is no "Bosnian King Tvartko"(1353) ... Didn't he rule serbia at that time and yet, you put picture of last Bosnian king "Stephen Tomash"(1463),even though he was "Catholic" and last King of "Kingdom Bosnia" ... What exactly is there in your medeival history,I know what is not

[@goranvukovic1991]

Bosna je tada bila Srpska država neuki stvore, nit su bili "Bošnjaci" kakose danas zovu muslimani niti je muslimana bilo u to vreme u balkanskim državama, Kralj tvrtko je poslao deo svoje srpske vojske na Kosovo pod vodstvom Vlatka Vukovića inače mog dalekog pretka sa srpskom vojskom i vlastelom iz srpske države Bosne da brani hrišćanstvo. Muslimana u Bosni nije ni bilo dok nije počelo turčenje u 16 Veku. Nauči da čitaš ozbiljne istorijske spise i zapadne i Turske a i srpske jer drugih nije ni bilo neuki parijo. I nemoj da lupetaš ovde , sramota je.

[@milosmladenovic2661]

@@Bosniak803 He is showing the most dominant Serbian state at the time, which in 1353 would be Serbian Empire, while Tvrtko became king in 1377

[@Bosniak803]

@@milosmladenovic2661 Bosnian KIng,right

[@rey6450]

😂😂😂

[@goranvukovic1991]

@@Bosniak803 Yes Bosnian, ortodox. Muslims in that time were passing Anadolia. Read an learn.

[@stanbatakarata6081]

Mutimir was 🇭🇷 Las Knight and Defender in Balkans slavic in Bulgarian Empire Dominacion in Emperator Simeon the Great.era. But Good job !

[@Polserb]

There was Serbian duke Mutimir and a bit later Croatian Muncimir

[@MarkoSimonov-r8s]

Samo bez mitomanije. Srbima su vladali 1. Višeslavljevići: Višeslav, Radoslav, Brativoj - Brana, Vlastimir, Mstimir, Pribislav, Petar, Pavle, Zaharije i Časlav; 2. Beloševići: Čedomir (unuk Krajine Beloševog), Dragoslav, Vladimir, Vojislav, Mihailo, Bodrin, Mihailo, Kočapar, Vladimir, Đorđe, Grubeša, Gradinja, Radoslav i Mihailo; 3. Nemanjovići: Nemanja, Nemanja II, Vukan, Radoslav, Vladislav, Uroš, Dragutin, Milutin, Konstantin, Uroš, Dušan i Uroš; 4. Pribačevići: Lazar, Milica i Stefan; 5. Brankovići: Đurađ, Lazar i Stefan. Posle su Vladali Obrenovići i Karađorđevići.

[@Polserb]

Gde ti je ovde mitomanija?

[@igordrobnjakovic9838]

Sledeći kojo dođe posle trenutnog vladaće dugovima države koja neće postojati

[@emis1028]

During the 7th century and between early and middle 8th the Serbs didn't estabilish any state they were a group of southern Slavs. But anyway good video

[@Polserb]

Serbia had it's own law, army, administration, court, ruler and all other things state needed. Only some uneducated laymen who didn't touch topic at all are saying things like that

[@emis1028]

​​@@Polserb Ok but still if you watch maps of the 7th century you can see that the territory that you had shown is part of the southern slavs at the time settling in old byzantine territory. Only in the Middle of the 8th century Serbia was declared an independent principality

[@Polserb]

@@emis1028 find for me any information about such "declaration" and tell me why it would be done for no reason 100 years later. Even Byzantine Emperor Constantine Porphyrogenitos gave list of Serbian and Croatian rulers but some just lack names(for Serbia he mentions that serbian prince led people to Dalmatia and that he ruled until Bulgars came. Then after him his son ruled and then grandson and after some time Viseslav became prince, for Croatia it's mentioned that Porin established duchy and got baptised)

[@dusanmilovic7421]

Malo si skratio teritoriju a stavio sliku na profilu utemeljivaču srpske drzave.Sram te bilo!

[@Polserb]

KiM? Stavio sam outline i stavio sam jasnu boju za sever

[@desperado30]

nice

[@CroatianUltraNationalist1]

Berislavić dynasty is a croatian noble family from slavonia not serbian. so remove the 1504-1535 part since they were croatians

[@Polserb]

Berislavići were despots of Serbia, by that logic I would also have to remove Tito

[@limapima999]

thats normal, ethnicity did not really matter back in the day so noble/royal families often ruled countries in which their not native to

[@domca4617]

They are rulers of SERBIA and not SERBIAN rulers. This means that all the rulers of the Serbian land, regardless of their ethnicity. But you would have to be able to understand written text and have an iq higher than 63 to understand that you idiotic coastal Hungarian.

[@Винчанац]

Hahahahahahah . You have country since 1995

[@John_Marstonm]

U are catholic serb?

[@planelsmederevo3705]

Nemanja's father was Zavida not Desa!

[@Polserb]

but Desa was ruler before Tihomir. Zavida ruled in Zahumlje and Ribnica

[@miloshp7399]

Dugo smo imali primorje i Hum. Najbolja Srbija Stefana Dečanskog 👌 bolje da su to branili nego se širili na Jug.

[@adhurimuka]

Wrong... During 1400s to 1900s instead of Serbian vasals you should put Ottoman Sultans as rulers

[@jerromedrakejr9332]

A vassal state still has its own ruler!

[@nightguardo]

1804 serbian first uprising... dont write if u are clueless

[@milenaprodfanovic8198]

ГОСПОДИ ПОМИЛУЈ🙏 ,,НИГДЕ СРБИНА" ЗА ВЛАДАРА СРБИЈЕ.

[@crop5059]

Even if I think that there are many mistakes related to e.g. the borders and some holdings of the Principality of Serbia and maybe even the borders of Grand Duchy of Serbia and a few other things that I could find fault with. I have the biggest problem with Bosnia, it is shown that the Banate of Bosnia later Kingdom, the Banate of Usora and Soli, are "other/less important Serbian states", really bro? I won't talk about the Duchy of Saint Sava/Herceštvo Kosača because the ethnic affiliation of the state and Kosača family is not clear. But medieval Bosnia had more in common with the Croats than with the Serbs, so I would consider it more of an "Croatian state" tbh. And if you consider the Banate of Usora and Soli to be a "Serbian state", then why don't you also consider the Banate of Jajce and Srebrenik to be Serbian? In regards to the video. Respectfully Great work tho!

[@15ti_Maj_23.]

There are much much more evidences that connect bosnian people ethnicaly to Serbs than to Croats. Perhaps only parts around Bihać are exception. After all from Tvrtko further on all Kings of Bosnia had title holding geographical holdings and only one ethnicity Serbs. King of Usora Soli west sides, Rascia.... AND SERBS (not Serbia). And this is all too well documented and no historians discars this, not even croatian. And it was only after Tvrtko finally claimed to be titled to all of Serbian lands that he put "and Serbs" in title. He never ever mentioned no Croats. Anywhere. And he was proud to finaly put all Serbs in title. Same was true for other rulers of Serbs from middle ages. Even Tsar Stephan Dusan was first King of Serbs then King of Serbs and Greeks and in the end some sources show him claiming title of King (Tsar) of Serbs, Greeks and Bulgars.

[@crop5059]

​@@15ti_Maj_23.I agree that King Tvrtko had the title of "King of Serbs" (Kralj Srba, Bosne, Pomorja, Humske zemlje, Ušori i Soli, Podrinja, Zapadnih Strana, Raške, Dalmacije, Hrvatske) but apart from him no other king of Bosnia had this title, Tvrtko gave himself this title thanks to his heritage from Njemanić through his grandmother to legitimize his rule in the newly acquired lands after the division of the Altomanović Realm, and to assert his power in the western Balkans. Since he gave himself this title, he could have had a legitimate reason to expand his power over Serbia and become a new Despote.

[@crop5059]

@@15ti_Maj_23. U can't deny the fact that BiH in medieval times was a Catholic land, and later also the Bosnian church had it's influence but it doesn't change much because the Bosnian church has it's roots in the Catholic church. it's also true that the Catholic church never had a strong grip on BiH, but the Eastern Orthodox church had influence only in areas that bordered Serbia where Serbs also lived im the medieval BiH.

[@15ti_Maj_23.]

@@crop5059 by mixing religion with ethnicity you just disqualified from any further discusion. Even Stefan Nemanja was possibly baptized as Catholic. Probably was. So where does that lead you? Further on, Hungary had much much much more catholic influence in Bosnia than Croatia or croatian nobility to be more precise. Where does that lead you? Also, Tvrtko successors also had title being kings of Serbs. Tvrtko II ,Ostoja, Stephan Tomaš and Stephan Tomašević. Check your sources. I can only imagine how histericaly would Croats claim for Bosnian kings to be Croatians if they ever ever mentioned Croats in their titles. :)

[@Stalker950-l3x]

@@crop5059 You have good points but I would like to clarify just some simple things: 1) Bosnia has been mentioned the first time in the mid 10th century by byzantine chronists as a part of a state called Serbia = Rascia + Bosnia equal "Sorabia" as a whole 2) According to written evidence, the linguistic border between Croats and Serbs had to be somewhere in central parts of what is now BiH. The "Bascanska Ploca" of croatian King Zvonimir proves that medieval Croats domninantly spoke the chakavian branche of the south slavic language. These linguistic traces spread from the dalmatian coast up to central bosnia. It is true that western Bosnia belonged to Croatia almost all the time till Croatia fell to Hungary in 1102. Tomislavgrad together with Knin was among the seats of the croatian medieval state. The eastern parts of Bosnia although with eastern Herzegowina have zero linguistic difference to Serbia or "Rascia". Eastern Herzegowina & south Dalmatia (Zachlumia & Trawunia) and Podrinje as well has been a part of the serbian Kingdom almost consistently till the mid 14th century. 3) The Bosnian church undoubtedly has it´s origins in the Orthodox Church. The early form of this church appeared in Bulgaria and spread across all the Balkans to Serbia and later to Bosnia. A short period of time they have been known as "Bogumils". Bosnia is just the only region where this church remained till the Ottomans came. 4) Neither the catholic nor the orthodox Church can really define the medieval ethnic groups of Croatia, Bosnia or Serbia. It has purely to do in wich sphere these regions have emerged - either the Frankish empire / Rome or the eastern Roman empire. Bosnia was split between these two while almost all the dalmatian Coastline has been Catholic till Dioclea (Montenegro). Throughout History we have strong evidence of Serbs being partly Catholic or at least recognizing the pope as the head of the Church --> the serbian Vojisavljevic Dynasty (11th-12th century Montenegro) has been Catholic. The head of the local Catholic church carried the title "Primas Serviae". The first King Mihajlo recieved his crown from the Pope.

[@planelsmederevo3705]

The True name of Serbian state during middle age was Serbian and seaside lands except during Emperor Dušan

[@Polserb]

it's titles serbian kings used. It was common in middle ages to use several titles to present lands under control. Even in 19th century German Emperors used several titles though nobody is denying that they ruled the German Empire

[@nazmiisufi3685]

Znaci ipak ste dosli sa Karpata?!?

[@НиколаСтаменковић]

Najmanje je bitno ko je odakle dosao . Inace bi pola amerike trebalo vratiti u evropu i afriku .

[@nazmiisufi3685]

@@НиколаСтаменковић slazem se! Ali smeta sto uvek napominjete (ne mislim na vas!) odakle su albanci dosli?!? Sve najbolje

[@ЦветелинСтанев-л3ы]

Фантастика

[@VladoZeljko-eg5me]

Kad kradeš Zahumlje i duklju

[@Polserb]

bole te Vojislavljevići kraljevi Srba i preci Nemanjića

[@VladoZeljko-eg5me]

@@Polserb ma boli me kurac debilu indoktrinirani

[@VladoZeljko-eg5me]

@@Polserb evo priznajes da su vam vladari bili hrvati

[@Polserb]

@@VladoZeljko-eg5me Vojislavljevići su iz Travunije/Trebinja. Veliki mi Hrvati...

[@VladoZeljko-eg5me]

@@Polserb opet priznajes....

[@bladerunner7781]

za laži u ovom sektoru, treba imati dva razloga,,,financijski i taštinski ...koji je tvoj ?...

[@darkomladenovic2831]

Za čistu mržnju treba biti Hitler, ti prema Srbima/Hitler prema Jevrejima. Isti ste😂

[@nadacalo9289]

SMD😂

[@dimtim7829]

Duklja Serbian but Rascia not? Interesting...

[@Polserb]

Duklja je u 11 veku bila bitnija od Raške. Raška ti je pokazana šutom bojom kad je Duklja crvena. Btw ima Vukanovići

[@limapima999]

you should probably do a similar video for bosnia and croatia. 1 it would be interesting 2 to calm down the nationalists hating on the video

[@goranvukovic1991]

aIt is very hard, Croats had some states but not to many, even them can not show us the graves of "Croat kings" , that what was shown on History was a joke. Related to the Bosnia that was Serbian state among the few, for example: in the time of battle on Kosovo, Bosnian Orthodox King Tvrtko Kotromanić (obviously Serbian ) , send half of his army with Vlatko Vuković as the leader to help Serbian army against Turks. Today name Bosnia is made from middle ages name of the Serbian state. Muslims in Bosnia never existed before 16th century when some of the Croats and mostly Serbs were forced to cross over to the Islam for the survival. So today propaganda is just a bull shit. For everything stated here there are serious archive and archaeological proofs. For instance king Tvrtko and Vlatko Vuković are buried as the orthodox Christians ... etc. We know the grave of Vlatko and now we are taking some measures for conservation. I can talk a lot about it because I was reading and searching in western, Turkish and medieval texts. Here lot of people are talking rubbish because they know just they were told by bull shit propaganda.

[@limapima999]

@@goranvukovic1991 i wont take sides on the whole bosnian monarchs ethnicities. croats claim their croatian catholics while serbs claim their orthodox serbs. my comment was a suggestion for a video that would list RULERS OF BOSNIA not their ethnicity just the rulers. bosnia had rulers from 1154-1463 while croatia had from 610-1102 and 1299-1322. i know neither of them existed the entire time in their history but ti would still be an interesting video, he could simply skip the periods when they did not have rulers or he could include foreign ones as well

[@ladyjane8023]

👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 ​@@goranvukovic1991

[@SS-lj9gz]

Ne vidim ovde Hrvatsku,kao da nije postojala.

[@НиколаСтаменковић]

Pa Hrvatska nije tema klipa .

[@brankoarsenijevic9748]

I naravno olosi posle Slobodana . 😞😞😞

[@АјдеЗвездодајгол]

Одличан видео само настави

[@Винчанац]

Sve super samo si malo zakasnio ali pošto vidim da si učio Bečku-Berlinsku verziju naše istorije moram da te razočaram jer naša istorija počinje pre 7000 godina u Vinči, Starčevu i Lepenskom viru a ne ta izmišljena laž o doseljavanju u 7 veku za koju ne da nema dokaza već su svi dokazi pa čak i oni koji su ovi drugi koristili dokazuju suprotno a to je da je cela evropa naseljena iz ovih krajeva. Prema tom prestani da praviš glupave klipove. pročitaj prvo Kraljvstvo SLovena od Mavra Orbinija, svih 500 strana a ne prvih 250, znači full verziju knjige pa će ti sve biti jasno. predlažem i ovima koji izmišljaju neke hrvatskekraljeve d ai oni pročitaju, da nauče ko su i odakle su. Jedini kojeg bi hrvati mogli nazvati njihovim kraljem je Aleksandar Karadjordjević koji je umesto prirodne Srbije napravio kraljevinu SHS a od srpskih terotorija napravio ovo što danas imamo lažne i neodržive granice.

[@Polserb]

Ta verzija je toliko Bečko-Berlinska da potvrdjuje srpsku kneževinu u Berlinu, Kneževina Kopanica. Super da Nemci bez razloga bi potvrdili da je Berlin bio srpski grad. to prvo, drugo dokaži mi kakve vladare i državne strukture je imao Lepenski Vir ili Vinča. Treće zanima me dali priznaješ da je Vuk Branković izdao na Kosovu

[@lazarstojanovic6325]

Brate fale Svevladovići, Oštrivojevići i Svetimirovići

[@milosmladenovic2661]

​@@lazarstojanovic6325 Šizofreno cepanje Popa dukljana

[@John_Marstonm]

​@@Polserbdjerdapska klisura je stvorena od strane tita da bi se sakrila srpska vincanska naselja,statue stari hramovi

[@MrBilder94]

@@lazarstojanovic6325 Све су то измишљени владари.

[@panzer8as]

pretty cool... you could have stopped outlining kosovo after the Tadic rule

[@Polserb]

why sould I?

[@Djelevic88]

Milosevic...

[@panonskyavar9653]

That is unreal!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@Polserb]

what do you mean

[@torikeqi8710]

There are several mistakes kn this video 1. There is no recognized servian state before 1195 AD and before that servs were under Bulgars, Romans, Hungarians or just separated tribes under no entity. Servs became Ottoman vassals after 1390 and in 1456 whatever was left became part of the Ottoman Empire. Between 1456 - 1831 there are no rulers of serbia because such a state never existed

[@Polserb]

Vlastimir defeated Bulgars in 830, Časlav defated Hungarians in 950 Vojislav defated Romans in 1042. There are confirmed examples of army, administration, law and other things that organized entity have Stefan Lazarević became independent Despot in 1402 and after that Serbs had wars with Ottomans for next 100 years and there were Despots in exile later You're literally denying Karadjordje's Serbia and other entities in last one Your comment contains mistakes, not mine video

[@bujartola]

@Polserb Condo Bimbashi which is in the middle of Belgrade. It is Albanian and this is also confirmed by the Albanian Plis that has it. And Kondo Bimbashi is Albanian and he is the one who freed Belgrade from the Ottomans 😉😉

[@aleksandarzoric2452]

​@@bujartolaYeah right Albanians have monuments in Belgrade but not in Albanian,hilarious same as you claim that Albanian killed Emperor Murat or that Skanderbeg to be yours...but you have Albanians from Albania and Montenegro saying even on tv that he was Serb😂 but ill give you points for trying😂

[@torikeqi8710]

@Polserb Vlastimir was a tribal leader. He defeated Bulgars in 830 and later on servs were defeated and became part of the Bulgar Empire. Belgrade was a hungarian fortress for hundreds of years and Vojislav's ethnicity was unknown, you can't make him a serb. In 1456 Serbia was conquered entirely and there was no Serbian state after that. I am taking about real state and not wanabe leaders. What wars with Ottomans after 1402??? Literally there are 0 victories of serbs against Ottomans in the 15th century Karadjorde was defeated and Serbian riot was crushed. Serbian state was recognised in 1832

[@torikeqi8710]

@aleksandarzoric2452 Murat was killed by his own son in a plot, not in battle. Skanderbeg is literally more important than entire Balkan history in the 14th and 15th centuries

[@planelsmederevo3705]

A gde su Svevladovići? You missed Svevladović Dynasty (capital city Skadar) right after fall of western Rome!

[@Polserb]

nisu postojali. Pop Dukljanin ih spominje kao gote koji su zauzeli balkan. Isti deo gde se pominju Pop Dukljanin spominje Svetopluka(vladara Velike Moravije) kao Hrvatskog kralja i spominje crvenu hrvatsku

[@planelsmederevo3705]

@@Polserb Letopis popa dukljanina je najverovatnije falsifikat kao i mnogi pisani izvori, a pravo pitanje bi bilo ko su bili Goti ili npr. odakle i kako je nastala narodna pesma Zidanje Skadra, kako je nema kod Grka ili Albanaca nego baš kod Srba

[@Polserb]

@@planelsmederevo3705 Skadar je dugo bio srpski u srednjem veku od ranog srednjeg veka do prodaje grada Veneciji 1396 godine

[@Polserb]

@Jokislaković nigde nisam rekao da su od kraja 5 veka. Srbi su od 7 veka vladali

[@antemrkic1702]

Ma e srbija do tokija u sljedećem videu a?

[@АјдеЗвездодајгол]

Не разумем спорност видеа? Комплекс неки или?

[@ngmadngmadovic6796]

@@АјдеЗвездодајгол ujkani ne mogu da se pomire s tim da smo mi imali realnu državu pre 1000god dok oni samo virtuelne kraljeve koji su vladali u nekim 8. dimenzijama

[@markobakovic627]

You forgot your Ottoman Rulers 380years !!!

[@Saulgud23]

Why not put modern day Montenegro with at least the yellow color

[@Polserb]

Modern Montenegro is a bit different

[@jorovicevmejl]

Морам принати да сам очекивап Србију ди Токија, на почетку. На крају сам очекивао Србију без и једног тока (речног). Што ће рећи...одрадио си као да си мене питао. Часлав је мало проблематичан али... Добро није лоше. У ствараи лупам ОДЛИЧНО (зашто ја нисам направио боље?)

[@OltBallMapper]

First ❤🎉

[@lulzimthaci6356]

Great lie 10000000 x !

[@jerromedrakejr9332]

You must be one of those Catholicized or circumcised Serb haters...

[@vukglusac4404]

All lies. Duklja is not Serbia .... newSerbian history

[@John_Marstonm]

Montenegro is not true ethnicity they are assimilated Serbs,keep dreaming

[@Polserb]

Vojislavljević dynasty is connected to Nemanjić

[@CroatianUltraNationalist]

@@John_Marstonm and serbs are orthodox croatians who started existing in 1195

[@darkomladenovic2831]

​@@CroatianUltraNationalistMržnja😂

[@robiszi7932]

Jovan Nenad wtf 😅 Jovan Nenad was not the ruler of Serbia, nor is that Serbia where it is shown. He was an ordinary rebel and leader of robbers on the soil of the Kingdom of Hungary. That's how he ended up, as a criminal. History is one thing, and Balkan mythomania is quite another.

[@Polserb]

Hungary anyway was doomed after Mohacs

[@robiszi7932]

@@Polserb Serbia collapsed a long time ago, and you didn't have this territory from the video. You scattered from the south and came north to Hungary as refugees-immigrants. This propaganda here is mythomania. You can wipe your ass with it

[@НиколаСтаменковић]

He was Serbian and he was ruled teritory for one year he isn't criminal he wanted to help people .​@@robiszi7932

[@avicenna995]

Srbija je 1835. godine od strane Austrougarske izmišljena.

[@avicenna995]

@Jokislaković Cjelokupna srpska istorija je šala Vuka Karadžića 😉.

[@НиколаСтаменковић]

​@@avicenna995Lapas glupsti za sve ovo imas izvore , Imas Franacke anala , Porfirogenita imas Jovana Skilicu vizantijskog hronicara imas i letopise nemanjicća i zitije.

[@НиколаСтаменковић]

​@@avicenna995I Vuk Karadzic nije belezio srpsku istoriju vidi se da nemas pojma.

[@avicenna995]

@@НиколаСтаменковић Nek imate vi.