Leica Q2 VS Fuji X100V (+ Sample Images)

[@TobisTings]

Leica recently released a new Firmware (4.0) for the Q2 which actually fixed or improved many of the "issues" with the Q2 that I mentioned in this video (JPEGs, Dynamic Range, Metering, Video Codecs and more). Check out my new video about the Firmware Update here - kzbin.info/www/bejne/jaKsZ4RjprGepNk

[@JakeWalksAmerica]

I've had the X100V for a few months and started to feel like something was missing, so I purchased a Canon R5 and a couple of lenses. I immediately hated it and returned it the next day. I can never go back to interchangeable lens cameras. They're just too bulky, heavy, and make photography a chore. So, my next option for something different was, of course, the Leica Q2. After watching your video, I fell back in love with my X100V. There's something about this camera that I cannot let go of. At least not yet.. It is an amazing camera with so much character.

[@markpata]

prices: Fujifilm x100V 1400 Euro; Leica Q2 5.250 euro.

[@cosmin12365]

ok, bye now!

[@rlsgrs]

€1600 since June… but yeah, no-brainer :)

[@markpata]

@@rlsgrs I've bought it for 1450 euro in June in Rome.

[@rlsgrs]

@@markpata Ow nice! Must've been just before the price bump. Did you buy the original Fuji weather resistant kit as well?

[@markpata]

@@rlsgrs I bought a NiSi filter. Cheaper but very good quality and really similar to the original one.

[@SamuelStreetlife]

Fantastic comparison! Appreciate the effort. Glad someone mentioned the horrible Auto WB of the Q2! It is driving me crazy so I always have set it to Daylight temperature and treat it like 35mm film :) Can't go wrong with the little fun X100v. Those straigth out of camera jpegs were lovely.

[@TobisTings]

Thanks Samuel, that means a lot coming from you! I also appreciate the useful tip regarding the WB as auto-WB really is a bit hit or miss. :)

[@RivkiLocker]

Oh my goodness, me too! I shoot my fujis and q2 side by side and the auto white balance on q2 is all over the place! Still love the q2 but there is that….

[@jeffyeah4256]

have a pen f...Is it worth upgrading to the x100v ?

[@p13579a]

@@jeffyeah4256 The Pen-F has it's own charms and some very nice SOOC jpegs. X100v has less noise at high ISO unless perhaps you have the Oly 1.2 primes but they aren't small. I prefer the X100v but I miss the Pen-F.

[@segzeeman7356]

@@jeffyeah4256 I have an EM5ii and I love Olympus jpegs. I think they rival Fuji’s and they do have customization capabilities. I’m pretty sure the Pen F was for competing against X100 line.

[@PrinZsuN1]

I owned a Sony A7ii, Canon 1Dxmkii, Leica M-P 240, and now the X100V. I never was so happy with a camera but especially with the image quality/performance straight out of the cam. Thank you for lovely comparison.

[@HatefYaminiOnline]

Great overview. Nice shots too. One thing I would add is that the Fuji's built-in flash and the automatic flash exposures are simply incredible. So it can slightly compensate for low light situations. Q2 can't do that. I used to shoot the Fuji X100 and then switched to the Q and now shoot the Q2. To be completely honest, I wish I had both cameras because the Q2 has stunning image quality and weather sealing, but the Fuji has stunning Jpegs, better white balance, better auto-exposure and a killer flash. And it's a lot smaller and less costly.

[@franzvonroenne4801]

the process of buying the q2 was exactly the one you describe for yourself, except that I didn't start from such a 'high level' system that is the Fuji. I used for a long time the instamatic approach that it is not the camera - an iPhone 12 lately in my case - but exclusively the things that you do with this tool, warts and all. So in a way I chose the Q2 exactly for the purpose of continuing that approach, but with a camera where I know its never the camera when a picture doesn't turn out fine. So for me, the learning curve (I actually started with a real Leica and a Leitz darkroom once as a boy, then used SLR analogue and digital, but all with ok but less than professional level cameras) is a steep one because I have to learn anew the basic reflexes required to adapt your camera to the situation that you meet or want to create. So your presentation was extremely helpful and encouraging, more so than any other I have seen. Thank you.

[@georgedemetriou1496]

Like you I purchased the X100V first and was very happy with it. Also like you I could not resist the urge to own a Leica and the Q2 was the absolute limit I could afford. Again like you I was totally underwhelmed by the Q2 initially and wondered what all the hype was about BUT it's growing on me. I will keep and use both, always a hard decision which one to take with me though!

[@TobisTings]

Really fascinating that this seems to be the track for a lot of people. The Q2 is growing on me more and I can't wait to used it some more. :)

[@mwales2112]

I paired my X100V with a Leica M Rangefinder and really like that combo. Really love Acros and use the jpegs most of the time out of the V, but the Leica M took over as my street camera mostly due to range focusing with a 21 or 28mm lens thats faster than any auto focus system... Great video Thanks

[@hedydd2]

Using manual focus with f8 works great for fast and stealthy street photography. Just adjust focus once then point and shoot all day long.

[@dummatube]

There is ONE CAMERA I WOULD KILL FOR: A Fujifilm 'X100VI' with the 40MP X-Trans sensor, IBIS, X-T style screen movements and an 18mm f/2 fixed lens (28mm equivalent) with macro and digital cropping with optical viewfinder frames for 35mm and 50mm. In short a 'Leica Q2 killer'! How about it Fuji?

[@adrianmuino3412]

Well IMO the contender for the Q2 is the X-pro 3 with the proper lense, not the X100. Anyway, it is amazing that a product that is 1/3 of the price can stand and battle.

[@squiddah]

Great comparison. I traveled the same path and my conclusions are almost exactly the same as yours - Even to the point where I have decided to not sell the x100v as I was going to do when I purchased the q2. I love both equally, but for different reasons. Your images are gorgeous and you really do have the v dialed in to create some great colors.

[@walterkirchmann9197]

Great comparison. I own a x100v and a M9, and my use cases are pretty much similar to yours, i.e. focus on shooting and not on postprocessing. Coming from Leica to Fuji my first impression with Fuji was a little bit frustrating because the complexity with customization is (for a Leica shooter) overwhelming and sometimes the camera controls you. Although Leica DNGs out of the M9 are >>50% perfect for me sooc, what I appreciate most with the x100v is the jpeg and film simulation offering which makes really fun.

[@CDeeez94]

Thank you so much for this comparison. The Fuji X100V has everything I need for my street/lifestyle photography needs, but the Leica is my dream upgrade.

[@radiomoths]

Agree re: JPEG's. I talked about this recently in one of my videos, having owned both. If I were a JPEG shooter I'd choose the Fuji in a heartbeat! But I shot RAW with both and preferred the overall handling of the Leica, so the Fuji ended up being sold. Detailed video, enjoyed it.

[@aussenbords4984]

Congrats on the upgrade! Bought the Q2 partly because you mentioned the X100v does not stop you from craving the Q2 and am really happy with this. Had the WB issue only once (in the snow). Other than that, I am also rarely doing anything in post and use BW HC or the VIV (with extra saturation and a tiffen Pro Mist 1/8) and constantly LOVE the jpgs I get from the Q2. It'll take a while to figure your favourite look but imho it's absolutely worth it 👍

[@TobisTings]

Thanks, thats so awesome to hear! And yeah, as you can see, I wasn't lying. That craving simply never went away, even though the X100V is a great camera in its own right. The Q2 is an absolute beast, but it is also a learning curve. I am starting to get more familiar with it and I am sure that I will get better results with a bit more practice. Just like you I also like to use a BPM (1/4 though) and I also use a polarizer every now and then. I just can't wait to get back out and use it some more. Its a bit of a challenge with winter and covid though at the moment. Anyway, thanks for watching! :)

[@exif6839]

The Fuji X100V is perfect for use jpg in combination with film recipes. I have stored: C1: Leica Style C2: Kodak Brilliance C3: The Rockwell (Velvia) C4: Eterna bleach C5: Agfa Ultra 100 C6: Kodachrome 64 II C7: Kodak Tri-X 400 And this features are not available on the Leica 😁

[@wongsteve]

I enjoyed your review a lot. Just to let you know, although the Q manual focus is silky smooth and responsive, it's also focus by wire (one of the best).

[@EvilSardine084]

I'm right there with you on the manual focus thing. I rarely use it but I do like how the Leica's is actually mechanical. I got my X100V just for the jpeg simulations. It's my "sketch" camera that I take everywhere and do random things with. I don't want to deal with post processing after and because of this I wouldn't get the Q2. The Fuji is such a fun camera.

[@TobisTings]

The Fuji is just such an easy camera to always take with you and it always produces great results. The Leica is incredibly capable, but using it is more of a learning curve than I would have thought.

[@noahpederson9816]

The Q2 is actually focus by wire! It's just so well done that you don't even notice.

[@industryrule-4080]

I did the same comparison a few months ago and walked away with the Leica. Out of all the cameras I own the Leica is probably the best I’ve ever used. The lens is absolutely fantastic, and the wider field of view works great in situations where you’re up close to your subjects and moving fast.You will have to pry it from my cold dead hands.

[@mahdiali6732]

I don’t have either cameras but something annoys me about Leica users. For records, I am talking about the M range finders. Leica users brag about the M range finder system and yet, I see ton of them attaching an electronic viewfinder, what the hell? Another thing, they always claim that the M system slows them and makes them think more about composition, well; I don’t buy this, turn any camera into manual mode and it’ll slow you down. You don’t have to buy a $$$$$$ for this.

[@alnordgren]

Good comparison, but I’m surprised that you didn’t mention other advantages of the X100V over the Leica Q2. These include a faster shutter speed (4000 vs 2000), leaf shutter, enabling flash sync up to 1/4000 of a second, built in 4 stop ND filter, and hybrid OVF/EVF viewfinder. I can afford any camera I want, so price is not an issue for me. I just feel that the X100V offers more capabilities. I think you may have gotten caught up in the Leica mystique. I’ll bet you hold on to your X100V. 😊

[@TobisTings]

You are right, I still have (and love and will most likely keep) the X100V, but to my own surprise I gravitate to it less and less and the Q2 really has started to grow on me. And yes to all of your points. There is just so much to talk about with these cameras that it is hard to get it all into one video, so some parts just didn't make it (despite being very relevant).

[@maggieh.9948]

Had the Fujifilm x100f for 4 years now, it’s still serving great!

[@markbaigent8373]

I am still using my original X100 from many years ago. It lives in a flappy front pocket in my work trousers.

[@sng2225]

Thanks so much for this video. It really covers a lot of questions I had plus confirms what I had thought about the Leica and Fuji. The Fuji was the first camera I just loved to use and felt if anything it was an extension of myself. And to that extent though I have many cameras I am still drawn to using it. Once you have used the Leica more I would love an update on your thoughts. Many thanks and congratulations on your engagement.

[@mlxndr7]

finally a video with UNEDITED sample shots. thank you.

[@borisharold]

great comparaison , thanks . I got my Q2 , 3 weeks ago after 2 years of Q-P and 2 years of Fuji x100f . I was shocked the first few days at the grain on Q2 compared to the Q ( I prefer the Q in that regard ..) the rest is also a work in progress but I still believe that Leica and fuji glass doesn't react exactly the same to light . I had more keepers with fuji but all very polite and pretty and after a while I felt the fuji colours were a bit "fake" for better words . On the other hand , I need to throw away more shots made by the Q/ Q2 but when things get right ( composition, light etc ) then it becomes really that much more special . a quality to the files , an almost ability to capture the subject but also the "Air " around it .It is not a version of the scene , it feels like the scene . I don't really mind the WB to be honest . I like the cooler tones of the Q2 and using Cobalt profiles slightly tweaked to my taste I am now super happy with the colours . ( I didn't like the muddy brown tones with adobe profiles for sure ) . Q2 jpgs are also better than the horrible Q jpgs and feel very appealing to me now . If you like to recover shadows and Highlights etc then not good but if you like an honest but filmic representation then they are really good . Again , Fuji jpegs are amazing indeed but often too polished ?? if only Leica could give us an update with a couple more jpgs options , it would be the most amazing camera . best

[@borisharold]

...and definitely interested to see your progress on how you edit the Q2 files ..

[@luiscarrillo1017]

I enjoyed this video from start to finish and I appreciate your honesty. I own the X100V and like you, have been very curious about the Q2. I always suspected that the build quality would feel different between the two despite how well built the Fuji is. Everything said about Fuji I agree with and I hope to one day run across a Q2 even if it’s for a little while. Thanks again for the information.

[@TobisTings]

Thanks! That means a lot especially since I had a ton of fun making it :). I hope you can get a chance to get your hands on a Q2 at some point. Be warned though: When I first used it I was at the same time slightly disappointed but still completely hooked. It is more of a learning curve than I thought, but no doubt very capable. The Fuji is still such a fun camera though. Thanks for watching!

[@LajosNagy]

I shoot the Q2, mostly just documentary style and I do agree with the white balance observation. Most of my shots are done indoors so the improved low-light capability and IBIS are very handy. I shoot BW HC with the contrast and sharpness both turned up a notch, usually around 3200 or 6400 just for that nice grit. No more white balance issue and the noise I find charming. Thank you for the video, I have been thinking about going the opposite way of you and picking up a Fuji, but it might not be the V, probably something like the XT4 just to complement the obviously lackluster video performance of the Q2 (and that lack of flippy screen. Flippy screen is life.)

[@jro440]

Hi Tobis. My name is NOT Mace Tazo, but Jose. Im a amateur photographer based in IL north of Chicago. I would like to thank you for the videos that you had so far shared. I think I had seen them all. I like the way you develop your “episodes” It makes sense to me in the way your progression goes. So, thanks so much for sharing. Now, Im in a cross roads right now, mostly because I have several trips to several destinations and am trying to determine if my Q2 would be enough for it. I don’t want to miss a shot because of the lack of a “zoom lens”. I saw your NY and Iceland videos. They were wonderful but Im still trouble by the fact that it is a fixed lens. I also owned a Leica Sl2 and sl2s, but the lens of the kit that I might need in order to be on the safe size is the main reason why Im troubled. I mean 47mp is a lot for cropping… but these are once in a life kind of trip, so I don’t want to regret not taking the right equipment for it. I’ll like to hear your ideas about it. BTW, I also have a Fujifilm xe4 with the 18-135 which was my travel photography lens for years. But Leica colors are again something not to take lightly. Your response would be greatly appreciated. Again thanks for sharing. Jro

[@JayFarrellphotography615]

Great and impartial video. I have used the X100F for nearly 6 years, and bought a used Q2 a couple months ago. I borrowed an X100V before doing that...I think you're right, the Q2 is wonderful, but not $4000.00 better than the Fuji, but I still don't regret the purchase and am greatly enjoying it.

[@pekomsmink]

this is one of the best informative videos for two close competitors, i think i will go for the x100v, very good work with this video on the two

[@MikeJones-ue7lu]

You should compare the Panasonic GX9 with Fuji X100V. It is solid and well built, has inbuilt stabilisation and takes panasonic leica lenses (including the rest of the MFT line up)and in my opinion the only downside is the EVF which is cleverly designed but hard to use in bright light unless you attach the designed eyeshade. I have owned three of the X100 series, including the V and they frustratingly feel and sound like toys when compared to GX9. Again, in my opinion the GX9 has been somewhat overlooked as a serious travel and street camera.

[@beny7160]

Excellent video. Great observations with very well thought out evidence or opinions. Your shots are so emotive. I almost felt like they were my memories. Awesome content. I'm still unsure of whether to drop on the Leica Q or go back Fuji but that's a 'me' problem :D

[@kimhp]

Could you share your JPEG settings for the X100V? The sample images look great!

[@carlosortega8357]

Leica Q2 weight is 718g. 28 mm fixed lens. (US$ 5800) Nikon Z7 II w/ 24-70 lens is 1300g (US$ 3600). I would not doubt which one to take on a vacation to paradise. The extra 600 grams are more than welcome in my backpack for the versatility, and the possibility of shooting stitched panoramas with more detail than any rangefinder could dream of. Nikons are the choice of NASA as of late.

[@Steve-rm5bi]

This is comparison I have been searching for! Thank you and phenomenal video! It really helped me make a decision:)

[@markhoffman9655]

Most admit to having some dreams of getting a Q2 but surprised to hear that you talk of 1/15 second as a being reliable speed - my Olympus E-M1 MkII ( 5 years old) has in body stabilisation that easily lets me shoot hand held at up to 2 seconds with a 50mm 35mm format equivalent lens. Panasonic isn't far behind that and I would have thought the Q2 would have been using some of their stabilisation technology.

[@Smitty19966]

I was going to buy a Leica 2. Until I released I could get the X100V, buy a new computer and have left over money to spend... 😂

[@hannahyun0]

Watching this into half way through I am still waiting for the most important spec - the quality of the images! Will be a punch time for it? All those reviews about cameras are hard core technique specs.

[@mobasti_7262]

I felt in love with the Leica!! Waiting for the q3..

[@theartbeaute]

thank you for commenting about the video capability! Ideally I would have 1 camera that takes good photos & reasonable video... it may be a unicorn.. I am wondering if the firmware update resolved any of the video issues w/ the Q2?

[@AlejandroGomezB]

Thank you very much! You solved all of my questions and also, wonderful shots man! Best wishes

[@WeekdayProductions]

Thanks, very helpful. Personal takeaways from your review: X100 for ovf and video, the leica for manual focus and image stabilisation.

[@nicklennaerts4791]

Very coherent explanations. I typically struggle to watch anything longer than 10 minutes on KZbin, but I'm almost done watching this one till the end. Great video!

[@hedydd2]

I have various cameras including a Q2. Unfortunately I also have a Sony A7III with both a 24mm and 35mm prime lenses which really does outclass the Q2 in low light and in many other aspects. Nevertheless the Q2 is generally a very nice camera to use. However if forced to choose any of these cameras in this size range, it would have to be the Sony, although I have a very sweet spot for the Olympus E-M1 as well. The answer my friend is blowing in the wind. The answer is blowing in the wind. [with apologies to Bob Dylan].

[@xuedi]

I love the fuji videos with software stabilazation, it crops just super minimalistic, but you get amazing results ...

[@manuelcdq]

I’m a Canon guy but i give you a very big like because of your 104 ST watch!

[@TobisTings]

Thanks and good catch! :D

[@richardharvie9123]

Hi Tobis - nice job - I have an XT4 and the Leica Q and love both . I love love love the Q in so many ways but I was only using for black and white as I preferred the XT for that as I found the a bit “flat” - then I discovered the Film Style adjustments! Go to film style on the menu - then film style settings - go to vivid and put saturation to high - you will get that lovely lush style ! Tell me what you think - Richard

[@RichardPilon]

Great video. I would appreciate more videos on the Q2 as you get more experience using it 😎

[@anchorsanvils]

Honest review of the Leica vs Fuji debate. In any case the X100V in a league of its own and a better comparison would be Leica vs Sony DSC-RX1R II

[@terrym540]

An excellently presented comparison. A Leica certainly retains it's resale value. Here in the UK a mint used Q2 will still cost over £4000. I opted to buy a mint used Sony RX1Rii which with a third party grip, lens hood, a set of filters, and a 12 months dealer's warranty, cost £1500, and am more than happy with the results.

[@TobisTings]

The RX1R II is so tempting. I wanted one since it was released, but first I couldn't afford it and then it simply wasn't available anywhere. Might have to snatch one up second hand as well at some point. Or maybe Sony will release a Mk III... would be interesting.

[@Raymond23rdOBC]

These are designed primarily as photography cameras that have a video option. Not the other way around. However, the Leica would be better for doing blogging on because of the manual focus. My experience is that its not about the number of pixels, but the Quaility of the glass. Good video! Keep up the nice work!

[@cw7422]

I have a Leica CL and a X100V. I’d be hard pressed to choose one over the other. Great video.

[@philmtx3fr]

Good review and thx for this. As you said these two cameras are in fact complementary. The focal and optic quality of the Leica are amazing , the jpeg and Fuji color profiles are astonishing. It s interesting to read in the comments that a lot of people reading this review got the 2 cameras and love them all. For me and my photography I prefer the Q2 : The Leica body is a jewel , I prefer its look (sorry I don’t agree your fiancée :)), thé manual focus is better , its sensor is better - its definition prevents you from having to add any lens adapter - , the lens is a dream and the fact the optic is stabilized is a plus. At this stage I don t understand why Fuji with its experience with the XT series didn’t integrate stabilisation in it. If it would be at 2,5k$ instead of 5k, the discussion between the 2 would be shorter. But Leica stays Leica…. So I will wait a little to have more money :).

[@ALWH1314]

I have a Leica Q2, it’s like I bought a legendary lens and got a free camera body. Q2 is definitely an all around camera, does everything with grace and reliably. The macro feature is a plus too. I usually go out with two camera bodies and extra lenses, but bringing Q2 means I don’t need anything else, well maybe a few ND filters.

[@TobisTings]

Absolutely agreed. Love the lens and the camera that is mounted to it. There are so many things especially regarding this lens that I left out of the video simply because I haven't had enough time yet with the camera to fully explore it. It is a wonderful piece of kit and I am glad that I have it in my arsenal now. Can't wait to go out and use it some more! :)

[@darylcheshire1618]

I have the X100 that I bought years ago and then bought the Sony RX100 IV which is smaller and more versatile. I was interested in the Q1 but it was mega-expensive and there was the (alleged) 6 month lead time.

[@frankwieczorek5112]

Regardless the price difference, the Fujifilm can not compete with the Q2. I had the X100v for 6 months and was happy to sell it, no regrets

[@sng2225]

So you finally pulled the trigger 😁. I will save this video for the weekend to watch at leisure. I value you opinion so can hardly wait for your impressions.

[@TobisTings]

Thanks! I hope you'll like it as I really enjoyed making this video. Took me a long time to pull that trigger but I just couldn't get the Q2 out of my head.

[@bricelettkeman1408]

Leicas are like poetry. They are designed with such detail and precision that you can feel the love that went into them. Using one is an experience and it goes beyond just a tool to capture photos. The fact that a Fuji camera is being compared to one says a lot about Fuji. I feel there is something romantic about the dials on top. You really get back to the basics of taking a photo. It doesn’t force you to slow down but makes you want to. In doing so you find you take photos with more purpose. You become eager to go home and load your images and see if they came out just as you saw them in your mind while framing.

[@stuartwalker121]

You are the most valuable type of customer that Leica could have. A body and a lens can cost anywhere between 7500 / 15,000 It's a jewellery company, its myth and reputation made from the 30s to the 80s. The stunningly wonderful little Fuji, light, nimble, pocket size, go everywhere, discreet with that tilt screen always gets the main job done, designed by photographers for photographers, and that's coming from a Leica M7 shooter.

[@MrYuriosh]

Nice comparison! Thx, enjoyed a lot. For me Leica is all about beautiful lenses, their ability to boost front object, separate it from bokeh. It’d be very interesting to see portraits comparisons for these cameras.

[@jjchockey]

What do you mean by “boost front object”

[@terrywbreedlove]

I would love the Q2 with a real 35mm lens. And with Kodachrome film simulations. Oh and it sounds like they need to fix the WB.

[@TobisTings]

Yes to all of that. Would buy that in a heartbeat. Maybe some day... one can only hope!

[@EthanFromLondon]

Thanks for the video. I have the Q2 and XT4 and this video really helps me understand the difference. By the way where did you buy the leather strap for the Leica. I want one 😆

[@ArminHirmer]

Depends what your style is. I think you cant beat the full frame look. But of course you can get that with a SONY A7C too, way cheaper and you can change lenses (and what I heard is, that the Sony is even better in low light) but rumours say that Fuji might come up with an XT or so with FF sensor...

[@shamielalbertyn9397]

I love Leica since i started my photographic career since the late 1980s German Technology at its best, Leica is extremely expensive here in South Africa thats why my option is the Fuji the price is much cheaper and the quality of Fujifilm is great

[@alhOOO2O]

You get absolute no more compression using the crop modes on the Q2; you only get perceived compression in your images when using a longer focal length from further away.

[@TobisTings]

Thats true but its not what I meant. What I was trying to say is that you get more compression on the 28mm than you do with the 23mm of the Fuji X100v when both are "cropped" to a 35mm equiv FoV. ;)

[@torinsall]

Very useful comparison, delineating each camera's relative strengths and weaknesses. As for which one to keep, there is nothing wrong with having 2 cameras for different situations... many of us do, for just that reason. 😉

[@TobisTings]

First of all, thanks! And yes, I guess thats exactly what I will be doing. Love both cameras and can't see myself letting go of either of the two. :)

[@Aniki91PL]

On the Q2, custom white balance for your jpeg with a gray card... It makes a difference for me,

[@segzeeman7356]

IMO Fuji wins because they’re constantly being compared with a Camera 3x the cost of any Fuji. After paying the Leica luxury tax, I think there are very few owners who are gonna say Fuji is better. Ultimately I think the winner is the Leica lust.

[@Pixelpeeps-69]

I believe leica q2 is more an show off camera to own but if the Leica name was removed from the camera body then nobody would probably bother with it

[@GoodLifeInSpain]

I have a Fujifilm X-T4 and Leica Q2 and love them both.

[@TobisTings]

Same here, wonderful cameras each in their own right.

[@exif6839]

The decision is easy: If you are a photo enthusiast and you want perfect pictures and money doesn’t play any role: get the Q2. If you are a photo enthusiast and you want perfect pictures and money plays a role: get the X100V

[@Pedro76mchlkg]

Your fiancée is right. The retro style of the Fuji is so much better looking than the minimalist style of Laica. I just wish Fuji had real manual focus, then it would be perfect.

[@Burritosarebetterthantacos]

Ive got a Q and I prefer the images out of my Fuji xpro2. I like Fujis color rendition much better.

[@34136TS]

I do love your Fuji shots, and great colours too. Congrats. Fuji low light jpegs depend a lot on the film sim...

[@bergkampdutchmaster]

Which film sims are great for low light?

[@34136TS]

@@bergkampdutchmaster See Pal2tech's video, high ISO good if you want grain with Acros or Classic Neg...

[@izustun9851]

I am sorry Leica but as a ex Leica fan, I have to admit something. If you spend your money for the Leica rather then spending for trips or Photo projects, your own books etc. that makes you a camera collector, not a photographer. Leica products, they are really overpriced in my opinion. This is why nowadays Leica cameras call as a "Dentist's Camera". So get the Camera that is going to support you regarding spending money for your projects.

[@walkingmanvideo9455]

3:43 which is why I purchased the XPro 3 instead of x100v.

[@iaincphotography6051]

At around 3 times the cost of the Fuji it's a no, besides the Fuji is less noticeable and even with nisi hood and filter on it still fits in my Pocket, and your partner is correct it's a beautiful camera with great lines.

[@gpdoyon]

I've not used either camera. And, a lot of comments from people who have had both usually say something like "It's a learning curve with the Q2..." or "I'm getting used to the Q2,,," but have had great success with the Fuji. I'm scratching my head. If I'm going to spend that much money on a camera I'll go with the Fuji medium format models.

[@ChrisWhittenMusic]

Kind of crazy to compare the two on video. Leica have never been good for video and would anyone use either of these for video? I wouldn’t. I have owned an X100T and a Q (first). The quality of the Q files seemed noticeably superior to me, probably due to the incredible lens on the camera. I tried to love 28mm but in the end it was just too wide for everyday use (for me). I owned my X100T for about three years and probably used it more and got more great images from it. I’m happier with 35mm equivalent. The Q images were stunning in quality, sharpness and colour. The X100T film emulations are lovely. I would guess the Q2 is a much better camera than the X100V for IQ….if you can live with the 28mm or the in camera cropping. I ended up buying a CL instead.

[@nikoniteo]

Thank you for covering video capabilities as well.

[@leonardlister4087]

Fantastic thank u have the x100f which I find really nice although not used to it yet, Been looking at the q2 and the hasselblad x2d ll so let’s see what happens 🤗🤗

[@photoreviewed-com]

Thanks for such a solid comparison, happy to share!

[@TobisTings]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@dprod6019]

What is your recipe please for your JPEGs out of the Fuji? Thank you

[@Mystic_sound]

Hello, Tobis! Which viewfinder do you prefer more.. and why?

[@robiulahmed]

Fantastic review. If you don't mind me correcting your English, it's better to say "build quality", rather than "built quality". I hope you don't mind, after all, your English is way better than meine Deutsch. Danke Schoen.

[@TobisTings]

Thanks, much appreciated. I was completely oblivious to this which means I made the same mistake in a few other videos before already. So thanks for saving me from further embarrassment!

[@robiulahmed]

@@TobisTings Nothing to be embarrassed about, we’re all here to learn from each other!

[@guyrichardthomas]

Excellent and honest video, many thanks. I have been trying to decide between the two and see the gap between the 2 isn't as large as I thought regarding image quality which is the deciding factor for me. However I would much prefer the fuji being wider so I need to look at the wide angle converter to see if that impacts on the image quality? Thanks again

[@electric_keys]

Did I spy a Sinn 104?

[@lerpack455]

I have had many cameras. l ended up selling my Fuji x100 for my l-phone because my shots were far more trustworthy. l also used the Nikon fine pix 950 which was pretty good. Also the Fuji was soooo complicated after using a 35mm roll film camera. The x100 lens is the same as the x100v? Why pay the extra for the Leica?

[@gu_gu]

I used both cameras but 28 mm suits me better so I go with Leica, that's all!

[@soccaboyxd]

Nice review - I didn’t know you and just started the video whilst working in the Homeoffice and at some point I thought: hm his English sounds like mine. Then you had a shout sequence in Munich 😂 Servus ✌🏾

[@braaji]

I love my amazing x100v, great picture, affordable, Q2 just leica name too expensive

[@stefanusadrian8398]

does your x100v have tendency to warm?

[@davidhunternyc1]

Great video! My history with digital cameras was this: Leica X1 > Fuji X100 > Fuji X100S. After a decade my X100S broke. I kind of want my next camera to be an interchangeable lens camera. I want an 85mm lens for portraiture. I’m thinking of getting the new Sony A7lV but I miss my Fuji. A part of me thinks I need to put on my big boy pants and move up to full frame. Any thoughts? Thanks.

[@surfbort]

What did you end up doing?

[@davidhunternyc1]

@@surfbort I’m still considering but I’m leaning towards the A7lV. It’s full frame and I want to use Profoto gear too.

[@_Argos]

funny ...why u didnt press the shutter to the half @ the fuji by manual focusing ? its way better like the manual focus from the Leica imo

[@alvaroderamonmu]

Which camera did you use for the beginning?

[@leemartin2978]

This is very nicely put together. I’m sure you’ve been asked before , but which lens hood do you have on the X100 V ? I didn’t see it listed in your equipment list. Thanks

[@martinohesse]

X100V is a fixed camera with 23 mm F2 lens (equivalent to 35 mm for 35mm cameras).

[@mavfan1]

@@martinohesse what does that have to do with the lens hood?

[@mjb1954]

How would you compare the viewfinders? I'm considering a Q2 Monochrom, and currently own a Fujifilm X100 (yes, the first one). I love certain things about my Fuji, and may just pick up a X100V, but the full-frame Leica has my attention, especially because of it's low-light performance and overall build quality. One thing that I especially love about the Fuji cameras is the hybrid optical/electronic viewfinders, and probably my biggest reservation with the Leica (besides price, of course, lol) is the fully electronic viewfinder. I grew up shooting film in Nikon and Contax SLRs and really kind of hate the idea of electronic viewfinders, but its been many years since I've used one - maybe they've gottent better? In the past I've found that they disconnected me from my subject too much. How do you feel - do you miss the optical viewfinder with the Leica at all?

[@normm7764]

I own the original X100 (lovely camera), the x100v and the q2 mono. As an older guy who processed B & W film for years, I find many current cameras over complex and detract from the simple joy of shooting. I use only jpeg, can’t be bothered with post processing. My reason for buying the q2 mono was to try to recapture some of this lost joy. I find the viewfinder in the q2 mono excellent. It shows high quality B&W (not colour) and shows proper rendering of the image if exposure comp. is turned up / down. It allows you to preview the image. The q2 is beautifully made, has incredible resolution and it is also simple to use - it has better “feel” than the x100v, but I haven’t done a side by side comparison. I’m fighting the urge to buy a q2 colour, as I already have the x100v.

[@TurdVapour]

Great video ! Are you able to share your JPG personalised settings on the Fuji. Your video has really made me question why I have been shooting raw for many years when as you say, I don't use my Fuji system for professional work. I shoot with the Xpro2 but would think the settings are universal for all Fuji cameras. Are you able to share your X100 personalised colours ? Your images really jumped out at me. Beautiful.

[@gautamasakyamuni6688]

"why I have been shooting raw for many years" Really? You buy a professional camera like this for Jpegs? What kind of photographer are you? A joke...🤣

[@dariomalerba3955]

Where is that place at 10:38? The sea style restaurant during xmas time. It's lovely.

[@TobisTings]

Strandclub Zee in Zeeland, Netherlands. Beautiful place, I usually visit the area a couple times a year. Its gorgeous in all seasons and has been featured in many of my videos ;)

[@dariomalerba3955]

@@TobisTings thankyou :)

[@frankgurtler7316]

versus- versus-versus -versus = versus make a jpg with each camera don't use additional edits print it with your options exhibit the picture and win a prize or recognition. Should neither of the two, price or recognition arise, it is definitely not because of the camera. If price isn't a problem for you, feel free to keep both. However, that will certainly not change anything in the picture, because if I then have to buy additional expensive processing aids, the additional value of 3.5 thousand pounds or euros more expensive camera no longer pays off, regardless of the brand. You don't see it in the picture afterwards anyway. I don't want to badmouth anyone's thoughts, just express a different point of view, because who cares what kind of cement mixer the mason of your house used ...;) a happy new (photo) year F.

[@stuartwalker121]

Who cared WHAT TYPEWRITER Hemmingway used? Someone once asked him: that Sun Also Rises was a great novel, could you please tell me what typewriter you wrote it on?