Too Boring? Hands on with the Tudor Ranger

[@jimv.6631]

I frankly don’t understand the negativity surrounding this watch. I consider myself a simple guy and I like simple watches. For example, a Sinn 556i has been my daily for the last two years. Personally, I love this watch and will probably own one soon. I’m actually drawn to the “boringness” - it speaks to me.

[@steelsteez6118]

I can help explain it to you. The negativity comes from the plain and boring design of the watch. There's nothing wrong (per se) with the watch. It'll suit someone who wants a very plain and simple dial design. It uses high quality parts with an outstanding clasp. However, the negativity is targeted toward the puke green fauxtina and the very simple and boring design especially with all that empty space around the center of the dial. You might like this type of plain design but you are clearly not in the majority. That is why you don't understand the negativity (to you it looks great because you like this type of design). Most (not all) watch enthusiasts that have been in the watch community for years need something a little more exciting than a plain jane field watch like this. This is why most of these people yawned when this was announced 😴. They're looking for something dynamic in a time piece that gives it character or makes it stand out. Again, not all watch enthusiasts, but most. It's why your opinion is not the majority. Hope that helps ❤️.

[@alectang1614]

@@steelsteez6118 yeah that's why the Explorer is also very boring to me. I owned it for a year and sold it after realising I'm not that type of watch enthusiast who likes "versatile" design.

[@timothycooper3797]

100% agree. Most people whine about size, lume, lugs, date window name a few. For 3 g’s you get a COSC in house movement, Simplicity, Superior bracelet and a 70 hr reserve. Not bad!

[@SillytanN]

It's about the attitude Tudor is giving towards this release. They are basically Rolex. They are like people gotta buy anything we release anyway as we have the best movement and bracelet at our price level. New design? Sorry next time bro

[@stevepapa]

For me, there's a few things I don't like. The size and font of the numerals being the biggest issues. It just looks a little dated. Applied markers would have also been a nice addition. And the green hue is something that doesn't work on this piece, maybe fauxtina would have looked better (see the Jame Bond Seamaster). But that's just my opinion on this piece.

[@bigiona3938]

I picked one up last Friday, and I love it. Simple, functional, clean, and super comfortable. The 39mm case is perfect for me.

[@normang663]

Word

[@lewisstredwick7616]

In the future most people will realise this is a class act and just about perfect .

[@rogerwatt8491]

Spot on, Lewis.

[@RiccardoCagnasso]

Yes.

[@grantmcwilliam]

Yes, just ask me the time, not what day it is.

[@franks6349]

agreed it’s perfect beautiful simplicity

[@hardy1416]

This a underrated watch in the public and thats perfect. The movement and the bracelet are doing a perfect job. I like the indirectly view on the polish hands and the small ring of the bezel. Pure Understatement but nice not boring in a shiny world. A watch for every single day.

[@RJ986S]

Add me to the 'super satisfied' list. I purchased one this past Oct 2023, and I absolutely love it with a mad passion! It's everything I wanted in an affordable, wearable, low-bling, low-profile, tool-centric watch. I'm 100% happy with the Ranger 39! Subscribed.

[@BAF605]

This one fulfils Hans Wilsdorf's brief for the Tudor brand admirably. Good quality at a cheaper price as he stated.

[@samnavon4149]

I love the new Ranger. It's not boring, just not fancy. It doesn't cry for attention or pretend to be something special. There are so many social situations where this is exactly what I want.

[@caspar_gomez]

agreed and that's usually what I need, the question for me though then becomes if I don't want something fancy or special, do I need to spend thousands to get that?

[@la_grenouille_de_la_vallee]

​@@caspar_gomez No! Buy a good made hommage !

[@osamu_90]

@@caspar_gomez That's really the issue for most people. Nice movement, finishing and clasp (I think the bracelet itself is nothing special), but if I want a watch that _looks_ minimalistic, there are plenty of good options including homages at a fraction of this price. I mean, replace the logo with some Chinese text and most of the people raving about this watch wouldn't even give it a second look, so brand recognition plays a pretty big role in the positive reviews.

[@caspar_gomez]

@@osamu_90 facts. But the sad thing is this still works on me even. I love and am impressed by my sinns and seikos, but I still feel the call of these brands. I'm working on getting over it

[@bettersteps]

I don't understand the Ranger hate. It's a sharp looking watch at a great price.

[@Psysso]

Its a bland looking watch with mediocre lume and vastly overpriced.

[@rogerwatt8491]

I agree, Emjay.

[@Daniel-bv2wc]

Very funny people complaining about this release. It's a reissue of the Ranger. What do people want? It has to be like the original design, if it varied from that it would not be a Ranger. Tudor have done a nice job with some technical improvements from the earlier model. It's an excellent subtle field watch.

[@rafaelandreu]

I tried it on a few days ago, and I'm in love.

[@chrisgrieves1468]

100% Bruce. I had a look at this at the new Sydney Tudor Boutique on the weekend. Not looking for a field watch but had to see what the controversy was about. It is far better in person than the detractors could imagine. Like any watch, handle it before you call it. And yes AR coating please! Where an Explorer 1 in NO way backs up its price, this one absolutely does.

[@nickdebenedetto2087]

I really like this. I will probably hold out to see if they ever release it in 36mm, but I’m so happy this exists. I don’t want any additional frills with the dial. Just give me the glorious simplicity of the Explorers and Rangers of old and I will be a happy man.

[@bushpig6837]

It's there any possibility of a 36mm?

[@terrorrbabbletwo]

I got to handle one on the nato strap this past weekend. As you said, it looks much different and better in person than what we've seen online so far. I didn't buy it because I want it on the bracelet so I will have to wait a bit until it comes in. For me, I absolutely love this watch even though I have a 39mm Explorer. I just love simple, time only watches. Thank you for making this video. And to those who say they don't like it, handle one in person. I bet you will change your mind. ;)

[@borassictime918]

Honestly, I think it’s ok. But I can get the same, no, better look from Khaki Field. Sure the bracelet is very good, but you don’t drop $3k on a watch just for the bracelet. Fact is this is getting attention simply because it’s the Rolex sub-brand; every single review on YT and watch media compares it to the Explorer, as do a high proportion of comments. I say that simply because if it said say Fortis, rather than Tudor, on the dial, it would be largely ignored, and reading the comments it sounds like alot of people who’ve picked one up are seeking confirmation that they did the right thing. None of this moves my needle towards considering it. Fundamentally it’s prosaic design lacks that tiny pop, tiny bit of fizz. Perhaps if the hands were white rather than high-polish SS that disappear against the dial, leaving the lume looking incongruous? Perhaps if the second hand tip was yellow or bright green, rather than a somewhat flat red? Perhaps if the Tudor logo was applied, rather than just inexpensively printed? So, it may be VFM compared to an Explorer, but that’s the problem. It’ll always be the ‘cheap’ Explorer, because that’s how most people see it; the younger brother who never made it to med school like his sibling.

[@sunildaniel1838]

Having tried this on at my local AD, it definitely does look better in person; not a watch I’d personally buy, but a nice simple design

[@thomasreed49]

I’m the same like the Watch a lot for me it would have to be with a 36 mil case

[@rogerwatt8491]

@@borassictime918 The Rolex connection doesn't come into it for me as this succeeds as a stand alone watch for me . . . the minimalistic approach really works and even if I could afford a Rolex Explorer, I'd get this as it simply looks better. Each to his own of course . . .

[@ryand5565]

"Ranger" done in smiley face text would be cool. I still love the North Flag with the strap. This is a nice piece altogether. Great videos, keep up the awesome work

[@TheBloodCrazed]

Picked mine up 10 days ago. The bracelet....20 mm, Non--stepping smooth taper, screwed pins, fully brushed, no rivets, ceramic ball bearings, and with T-Fit...What more could you ask for in a bracelet Love the shape of the hands and the 3,6,9,12 + sticks. But lume is disappointing The tip of the minute hand will disappear into the dial if it is not catching any light

[@thomaskroon9213]

Do you think the bracelet would fit on a Tudor BB 58?

[@TheBloodCrazed]

The watch idiot channel tried to swap the Tudor pro bracelet onto the 58 and also then just the clasp and apparently Tudor made it impossible to do so due a very small size change of the center links and a tab by the end links of the pro. Apparently Tudor intentionally made it impossible. I have no idea if Tudor did similar to the Ranger to 58 combination swap. Let me know if you find out.

[@edrader]

totally agree. the lume is the weak spot on this watch. not the color but the luminosity

[@neillordsnootyhawhaw812]

I think the Ranger looks great, a simple no nonsense watch. The simpler looking the better, flashy watches just look trashy…….

[@shookmei88]

Great clear shots, you've filmed in a way that makes the piece look more pleasing than others and totally agree with you about the anti reflective issue and why it was a missed opportunity. Thanks!

[@FatController23]

Thanks for your review. You have articulated the reasons I like and bought the new Ranger. It is what the Explorer used to be to put it simply. The criticisms come from not understanding the heritage it is capturing.

[@darrenwest4024]

I do like it maybe just not enough

[@tonytrinidad5294]

I’m glad you were able to handle this in person. Too many people ripped on it without seeing/handling it in person. Their assumptions were based only on pictures. I have this Ranger and love it! Another informative and fair review Bruce.

[@loganholmberg2295]

True but at 3k dosen't it look like it should have something more? There are allot of watch brands doing something similar for way less nowadays. Like the hamilton Kahki field for instance. If you're looking for an expensive sleeper this is probably a great watch but when you look at the competition even from good micro brands today this looks lacking. It NEEDS something to stand apart from the rest cause I look at that watch dial and i can count 20 chineese microbrands who've been selling a similar dail on 100 buck watches for years now. Watches with dependable japaneese movments.

[@SillytanN]

did you buy it?

[@eramars5699]

logan holmberg I personally wouldnt buy the watch because of the fake lume, but , the khaki field is no match for this watch.

[@deanwaller8283]

​@@eramars5699 agree,the Hamilton crew ALWAYS show up on these threads carping on about the field khaki...like the guys no one invited to parties but who always how up anyway 😂😂😂😂

[@watchthepoint1604]

Wasn’t even on my radar from when it was released and from the numerous videos that moaned about the patina and the dull looks. Then popped into my local AD and tried it on and was sold straight away. It’s a great tool/field watch that doesn’t shout Tudor but you know you are wearing a quality timepiece. Like others said, fully brushed, t fit clasp, no rivets, 39mm and 20mm lugs. What’s not to like about this watch. It’s so much better in person and on the wrist anyone that buys one will not be disappointed. Well done Bruce for the honest review and showing what this watch is about

[@mezcalycafe8702]

I love the classic look .

[@watchlover61]

would this model brand be a good choice after my tissot prx pm80?

[@ripperx444]

I love this. Will be added to collection right away!

[@MrJimmyWiles]

John just hooked my wife and I up for our 15th anniversary. I got the black bay heritage s&g and she got a ladies omega aqua terra with rose gold.

[@sacdubro]

The design of this model is just what I was looking for in my next watch. The clean unassuming face with a brushed steel case/bracelet and solid build quality that doesn't attract attention. This fits my style of luxury.

[@tarasmathers7423]

Great footage as usual, Bruce. I'm a fan. I think it's a very solid offering for the price. I also tend to agree w/ you about the dial aesthetics.....if it's not for you, then there is always the BB41, or the BB36. Those IMHO, are more traditionally modern offerings. A lot of people don't like the "spade style" hands as well. I'm a fan of those too. The purpose of the model, is to invoke the experience of the rangers, of the Greenland expedition, on a more contemporary and wearable platform. I think they've achieved that here

[@DeezSkates]

I think it has potential, but I’m just not a fan as it is. If the numbers were applied instead of painted, that might help.. but I think what gets me most is the off white/yellow look to the numbers. It looks like you’ve got a brand new watch that’s just been sitting in the case for decades and the numbers yellowed over time. Takes away from that new watch feel.

[@VMIyanks04]

I love Bruno! I recognized his voice at the end! Hilarious! I always visit him whenever I’m in town!

[@eljayr4669]

The watch has everything going for it. Spec and price but when I saw it in the flesh at my local AD it just left me cold which was a big disappointment.

[@skalar-haubitze1619]

I suspect that this watch will be as unpopular but also underrated as Omega's 2017 Railmaster reissue.

[@robertmontgomery4884]

Yes I am coming around. Great shots of this piece. That helps. Thanks Bruce.

[@montanamckinney1462]

Teased myself and went into my AD to try on the fabric version. Once you touch it, you see why it’s great. Ordered a bracelet version that day.

[@craiglinford1604]

Love your reviews Bruce …. And I love your passion for watches …. Speaking about the Ranger I went to my local Tudor store the other day … the Ranger looks so much better in the flesh than in pictures and I looks great on the wrist … I’m definitely considering buying this .. keep up the great work

[@Geniusclicks]

They had me at brushed steel & no faux rivets. It’s a very clean no nonsense, no glimmer/ polish etc. for the person that just wants to get to work and isn’t trying to walk the watches runway. Like you pointed out. People can get the 41 or 36…. That price for that silicone hairspring movement? ☄️☄️☄️☄️☄️☄️☄️

[@southnx]

I have the prior gen smile dial 41mm and love it. I wear it on leather and natos because I feel thats more appropriate for a field watch (and I'm not a fan of that gen bracelet straight end links). I am glad they are now doing fitted end links and the new clasp looks amazing. Great upgrades for those who are interested in this piece plus the in-house movement with longer PR👌

[@watchchimp3102]

I just purchased the previous 41mm Heritage version of the Ranger and when it came in I was really blown away by how nice it was in person, but I recognized how it would be too large for someone with a smaller wrist. So this new one should really solve that problem and for that reason I think it will be much more popular. The one thing that carries over, the slightly boxed crystal; nobody mentions it, but it really goes a long way to elevate the watch to another level. I love the hands the arabics, the bracelet! The biggest question for me is: now that I have the 41mm should I get the new one too???

[@chia-mingyang5804]

I like it more than any BB or Pelagos. It looks simple and I enjoy that. I don't need unnecessary decorations or texts. However the non-AR crystal does bother me.

[@anthonystevens8683]

I saw this watch at the AD last week and have to agree it looks and feels so much better in the real life. I didn't purchase as I already have watches that cover this segment pretty well right now. I have to admit that I've definitely not ruled it out at all but just not right now. I would have preferred applied lumed ceramic slices like the BB Pro uses (but obviously keeping the same view of the dial) and just maybe text 'Chronometer' in red (to match the end of the seconds hand) beneath the Ranger text. I do find that I'm still warming to it as it is so maybe one for the future.

[@jasue2000]

The Ranger is a freaking BEAST!! And it is a thousand miles from boring!

[@jayoungrn]

Just got one today - while I was sending my Exp 39 in for service. Great watch and the quality is there - love the bracelet

[@frzmtl3849]

I think it’s a cool watch, it embraces the vintage vibe. A fully brushed watch is great for every day wear. It compares to the Omega Railmaster but priced better.

[@aryakhaligh9797]

Very nice mention on ARC. It is the most important aspect of a field watch for me.

[@edrader]

i've never once thought this watch "needs" AR coating and i am an outdoorsman. if the ranger had a flat crystal lack of AR might be a problem. still, it should have AR coating

[@randyreynolds1045]

This is accurate, and really comfortable!

[@MrHav1k]

It looks great in this video, but in pictures online it can look pretty mid. It's a watch you have to see in person though. I saw it in person at the AD and oh man.... what a beautiful watch. Gotta have one. See it in person before passing judgement people!

[@SomeoneJustWatching]

As someone who recently got the Black Bay Pro, this watch just confuses me. I will admit, if i had the Pro and the Ranger next to one another i would have an interesting conundrum, as both represent everything i love about Tudor and what i wanted out of a watch, a “get out there!” kind of watch. However, why would their make so many surfaces of this brushed (when not on the original ranger) but leave so many surfaces of the “Pro” polished? I look at this and think “why did they brush that part?” and i look at the Pro and think “why didn’t they brush that part?”

[@dillonm4794]

Tudor, in house movement, steel case and bracelet, fantastic quick adjust clasp. If you told someone all of those specs I’d bet they’d be pretty excited. And yet…honestly pretty lackluster in my opinion after I saw it in person. Just doesn’t do anything for me, and I think it’s mostly down to the dial being so one dimensional. But hey, if people like it I won’t disparage them! Spec wise it’s a great watch, so if the aesthetics work for them more power to them. For the price you could do *much* worse.

[@DennisFutball2396]

It’s nice, but shouldn’t be compared to the explorer. The better comp is the omega railmaster denim which has printed markers and an all brushed finish

[@welcomewrist]

I am a big fan of the watch. After watching videos and reading opinions about the watch, I had to check it out in person. It's a fantastic release with an awesome bracelet. When I saw it in the flesh, it wasn't "boring" at all, however, I can see how others can justify that description.

[@railmastercnr]

Got mine a couple weeks ago and it gets more wrist time than my Rolexes. There is much beauty in its simplicity

[@mattmoehr8581]

Picked one up a week ago and love it! Incredibly accurate and simple. I like simple…

[@simonmiles1972]

Some say underwhelming. I say understated. Love it.

[@jimg518]

This one is growing on me. The size is perfect. Not a Tudor fan, but this one checks almost every box for me.

[@michaelphillips5263]

Hi Bruce. Care to comment on how this new Ranger compares to the North Flag? Also, do you know whether the Ranger is COSC certified?

[@RagnarHoff]

I had no interest in Tudor before this one so obviously they are doing something right. Simple vintage looking no-date with a solid movement inside is right up my alley.

[@williambottaci5320]

For me I like the basic look. Tudor have got it right with this model. 39 mm looks better than anything larger, it has a good looking hour hand (never did like 'snowflake') and basic means versatile because it's also what a 'pilot' watch should look like.

[@jkacnt]

I'm still going to hold out until Tudor updates the 36/41BB line. The ranger's 12 just looks off and there's too much free space on the dial.

[@TheCrackerman501]

I purchased this watch in May 2023 and it's scratched every itch that a field watch can give you. I'm glad that Tudor made it smaller than the previous version but with that said what would perfect this would be 37mm and a date with cyclops like an older 70s version of a Ranger. Field watches aren't supposed to be flashy and showy so some of the boring complaints are kind of foolish in my opinion. I think Tudor nailed this model.

[@JJL206]

This is a great watch.Very true to the Rolex/Tudor models that came before it. I've seen it in person at my local AD and it feels great on the wrist. For those thinking they'd prefer a 36mm - the 39mm has a relatively thick bezel so the face appears smaller. I have the 41mm Tudor Heritage Ranger and think it has a bit more personality. I'll be keeping it. Things I wish the new 39mm version had: a rose logo above the TUDOR logo on the face - to match the signed crown; and a full red seconds hand - that would give it a lot of pop. The lume is great, just a touch greener than the 41mm version.

[@hegemanc]

I overlooked this watch so many times. Once I tried it on, with its perfect fit (on my 6.5 inch wrist), I bought it immediately. Its my everyday watch, it looks classy but not flashy. I love it. Only shortcoming, I wish it had a date window. Otherwise, a great piece.

[@RedwoodAggie]

I do still need to see it in person, but I'm not feeling the greenish/yellow lume in photos/video. Also once somebody pointed out the hands and indices color is just a hair different, I can't unsee it. Other than that, it's great. The space on the dial is perfectly find. I love the size, movement, bracelet look/T-fit inclusion. All great stuff. I think I'd either want to see the BB Pro's ceramic lume used for the indices/numerals, or make it printed white (with a healthy amount of lume layers). When I see something like the Sinn 556 A RS, that just shows me what it could be.

[@adambarkley4918]

Start by saying I am so on board with this new watch. My only thing is that I think it would have looked so much nicer if the 3,6,9,12 markers were in an applied format similar to the BBPro. I think it would differentiate the watch that little bit more from the previous ranger model. Other than that, lay on the micro adjust clasp etc etc

[@dis6900]

Just picked a Ranger up from Brent L Miller (my favorite AD) and Brad is the man! The Ranger is such a great timepiece for the price. You cannot find an in house movement with the incredible bracelet for around $3,100. It's the perfect compliment to my Rolex Explorer too. Kind of the poor mans Explorer that I won't worry about getting rough with. Love your videos, Bruce!

[@rogerwatt8491]

It's a truly great watch . . . I love the minimalism of it . . . less is more . . . the negative space on the face really works vs all the stuff that needlessly clutters up watch faces these days.

[@davemcc7713]

I've had the chance to see it in person. All my complaints relate to the numeral font and colour. The numerals look like they were drawn by a third grader. They are large enough that this is readily apparent every time I look at the watch. Also, the green is really, really green. It's one thing if the lume glows green in the sun or in a dark room but when it's just this pale, sickly green all the time, that's a hard pass. Other than the dial, it's darned near the perfect watch. Case - A+. Movement - A+. Bracelet - A+. Clasp - A++. Dial - F-. The no-date 3, 6, 9, 12 dial layout is my favourite design. It should be a no-brainer for me. With a more attractive font in white lume, this would already be in my collection.

[@ugabrew]

I agree with you 100%. Ditch the faux lume and the 3rd grade font (especially the number "1", which is too tall), and this would be near perfect. It's still a great deal for the specs and build quality, but the dial is too important to look like an afterthought, or more likely, an intentional downgrade to preserve the Explorer's standing.

[@nerychristian]

@@ugabrew It's the same numeral font as the vintage Ranger watch.

[@ajgross67]

I think the negativity was around the Greenland Expedition marketing around it. I was expecting something more like the Pelagos FXD, something unique and quirky and more tied into the expedition. This is a great watch and I really like it, and I think they made significant improvements over the outgoing model. It just would have also been nice to see something like a recreation of the silver oyster prince used in the expedition or something that would be more purpose built for modern explorers or something

[@BAF605]

I too would have liked to see something more like the original expedition watches. The first Ranger came years after. If this watch becomes a success it will be forever linked with BNGE 52/54 just as the Explorer is with Everest, though it too was a watch that didn't exist when Hillary and Tensing summited. Reservations aside my order is in. I like it.

[@stephengarratt8027]

Great review as always Bruce! Got " hands on" with this with my AD and had mixed emotions. If you were in the market for just one piece then this a solid choice. For me it was beautiful on wrist, but, didn't get the heart racing and yet at some point I think it could with it's adaptability.

[@Tonysoprano497]

I was in the dull camp . Tried on in AD love it . It’s beauty is almost in the dullness ..I’m on the next that arrives .it looks great as it is glad no applied or polishing . Can’t wait to get a few dings and scratches at play this is like fine wine and will improve by age ..

[@jrsark]

Just wish there was a bit more to the dial, it looks so sparse, even for a field/tool watch. In harkening the vintage vibes, this Ranger would have been immensely improved with the old rose logo and smile text without over-busying up the overall look. Still really like it nonetheless.

[@guignolification]

Thanks for the great images on that watch. As it comes to arc on the outside of the crystal, it scratches easily and would bother me even more. I have no problem reading my BB 58 in all situations till now, so I won’t miss it. I have a scratch in my Certina DS-1 crystals coating an that looks not to good.

[@davidgartrell90]

I love it. I’d like to get one but a quick google search found no Tutor ADs in my area. Billings,MT

[@leiflagercrantz8853]

Look great to me, love it

[@aubreyhaines7282]

I liked the watch first seen, and it still getting beter and beter! Materfact, I am going to purchase this watch end this year 😀 I do have for example a Rolex Day date, but it’s not save to have on your wrists these days. That’s what I like about Tudor…subtiel 👌 Enjoyed your review Aubrey (Canadian) from Netherlands 🇳🇱

[@markbyrum4743]

Custom Ranger? Maybe Tudor had this in mind, ala Bremont military unit custom watches. Perhaps that is why that big blank area exists below the spindle! Good vid. Keep at it!

[@steved8386]

So elegant.. love it.

[@PedroFilms]

I was against getting this watch given the lack of applied markers and simple design, but the more I saw it in person and compared it other watches, the more it grew on me... until I bought one a week ago. I must say that it's a very nice watch and it's vintage simplicity is what makes it appealing to me.

[@LVbibby]

Thanks for covering this reference; I inquired with my AD already. I wanna see it in person like you did seems like a great option and reasonable pricing.

[@MrJimmyWiles]

How does one go about getting a custom Tudor dial made? Asking for a friend 😉

[@esarempee]

Your footage is great! Interests me how some reviewers can show a watch at it's best and others can't.

[@jodysilvia2]

I was on the hunt when this watch came out,I did consider buying it but pulled the trigger on a Omega seamaster 300m and hope to revisit the Ranger soon.

[@AutoloverNG]

The more I see this the more I fall in love with it

[@alienlife9832]

I thought this was a very meh watch when I first saw it but last weekend I got hands on with it....... honestly I feel in love with it and bought it then and there it's awesome not perfect but still awesome 👍

[@stebesplace]

Bruce did you find the clasp edges, and lug tips to be super sharp? I tried it on last weekend, and it was a great size on my 7.5” wrist, but the edges felt sharp. Bracelet also didn’t feel quite as solid as the Rolex on my wrist. Anyway, fun watch, good price point, I think it’ll sell good over time.

[@keltecdan]

I love the fact it doesn’t have an AR coating so that it mimics an acrylic crystal like the vintage ones used to have. Only thing I don’t like is the size could be smaller and the crown should be like the black bay 54.

[@JericVillaflores]

Love my Tudor Ranger, it’s simple and utilitarian…it’s what makes this watch great!

[@26700]

I bought one over the weekend and the minute marker has some blemish and the boutique telling me we need to send it away for at least 4 weeks for Tudor to check it out wtf 😬 🤩

[@ljsanchez12]

Wow! Great video! I kinda hated the watch, but after your video it made me rethink on how I viewed this piece. Thanks bud.

[@FFL3001]

I got to handle it a couple of weeks ago and as much as I dislike Tudor I must admit that it was kinda impressive. The bracelet, case and clasp was very nice. The brushing seemed coarser than something like an Omega or a Rolex though, so I can't really say that the pricing is wrong. I love the fact that they didn't stick snowflake hands on the watch, the colour of the lume is nice as well, really well judged. But there is nothing that pops. The dial just falls flat for me. Then again, if it popped it would compete with the Explorer and since this is a Tudor that just cannot happen. I'd go for an Omega Railmaster instead. Almost as cheap and much more charming.

[@cesargarcia5390]

This is not boring once you see this watch and try it on.. Pictures, youtube videos, renders etc does not make any justice.

[@ethanwalker7865]

I think its a great design, I love the hour hand. Is anti reflective something you can apply or have a watchmaker apply?

[@edrader]

i really don't think it needs AR coating. don't get me wrong it should have AR coating but i have never been in a situation where it has been needed.

[@DJ_CRIZP]

I really have zero clue why there is such vitriol online for this watch. It's a great release, but because a couple of hipsters online decided that it was too big and the 'lume color is ugly'.... you can't make this stuff up. But it has become a massive echo chamber. I really don't get it. When makers come out with somethine new, everyone hates it... and then complain about submarinar clones.

[@jonnypescado1]

I just tried one on for Shiggles today. I was looking at a BBGMT & this stole the show. I thought I had to wear 42mm+...this fit me like a glove.

[@MrGuto]

Absolutely gorgeous watch!

[@jorgerosas5138]

Absolutely beautiful!

[@kk7sm]

I dunno... Given the competition in this segment of the market, I'd lean hard toward the Longines Spirit.

[@robertlock6041]

Hi Bruce, nice video of a watch that, like all Tudors, seems to polarise opinion. I was underwhelmed when I first saw it, but it is tough, versatile and has a great movement. I really need to see this in the metal before passing judgment. One of your posters commented on a blemish on the Ranger he bought. There have been too many examples of problems with early production Tudors: my suggestion is to let production settle down before purchasing. Hang on to your money until any quality issues have been dealt with.

[@EDHBlvd]

It’s a winner. Still waiting on my AD…

[@triniboy05]

Not for me, but I hope those who like it get the opportunity to own and purchase it. We don’t need to all like the same thing, that’s what makes this hobby great! God bless you all 🙏🏾

[@anamisidro8453]

Beautiful and simple. A true tool watch. Simplicity is luxury. I’ll get one to make my 36mm explorer done company 😉

[@jeremydahm2124]

100%. Really liking this after seeing video. For me this is a 39 version of a vintage Explorer. I'd like but wouldn't pay market for a 20yr old Explorer that wears a little to small but this is nearly perfect in my eyes. That said, a Tudor 36 wears larger than a Rolex 36 and I'd like to see this watch in 36. I believe we will. The Exp39 is a watch I love but style wise it is bordering on Datejust more than being a tool or field watch (white gold applied markers, polished surfaces). This is a tool watch. Going to try one on very soon.

[@meltdowngrfx969]

Dial is perfect. Can’t imagine adding a logo to it. Much improved over the previous version.