Top 10 Cards that Remove Energy Cards

Рет қаралды 12,995

TheDexLogs

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 35

@speedroidterrortop5391 7 ай бұрын

rip snorlax pfp you were a real one

@mingiboy9253 7 ай бұрын

What does Yugo here?

@beanburrito4405 7 ай бұрын

5:29 This is one of the funniest edits ever. Jealously Singe is first called Burning Jealousy, then it is corrected on-screen to Jealousy Singe lmao

@vakerofromhell881 7 ай бұрын

A top 10 evolving stage 1 cards (like kirlia or flaaffy) would be cool

@rag2627 7 ай бұрын

Let's go the guy that pronounces TCG weird is back!!!

@theshinobigamer5737 6 ай бұрын

We Wuv Wogs🥺

@yingmustang67 6 ай бұрын

I played super energy removal with a recycle energy to combined! In my slowking deck combined with Murkrow and dark Umbrion in the Neo series!

@lylearoyii 7 ай бұрын

Holy crap! That, that was an outro! Good job. Good video bud!

@coffeebean2 7 ай бұрын

Mr. Logs has a pokemon channel now? Maybe the "Top 10 Hiru Spinoffs" isn't so far away after all.

@williamfalls 7 ай бұрын

He's had it for awhile now.

@Mitjitsu 7 ай бұрын

Super Energy Removal, even as a one use per game supporter will never be reprinted.

@cyberdragonzekrom6790 7 ай бұрын

As an Ace Spec Supporter? I think it could be ok.

@Mitjitsu 7 ай бұрын

@@cyberdragonzekrom6790 If a BDIF deck accelerates energy from the discard, and decks that don't rely on attaching energy to win games, then it might be OK. As such decks being around would deter it from being played in every deck. As if there's no excuse not to run something equating to SER, then it's too powerful to allow.

@Ergeniz 7 ай бұрын

@@Mitjitsu Energy removal and Super energy removal need to come back, they're fine. The former as an Ace Spec wouldn't be a problem. Regular ER is fine once a turn. Give both a discard cost and they're good to go.

@gabrielcastillo9745 7 ай бұрын

No thanks, control decks are sufficiently strong as they are right now. I don't wanna go back to the sun and moon era with like 7 different energy removal cards. It is true that some strong decks like Gardevoir or Ancient Box would not have trouble against energy removal cards, but they are only a fraction of the meta.

@venus7795 7 ай бұрын

Fan of waves is such a honorable mention, it was so good in a format full of urshifu and mew vmax decks

@godzillahomer 6 ай бұрын

I've got a suggestion. Top 10 Cards Worst than their Pre-Evo. Cards from a set that are worse than the card you evolve them from from the same set. My experience with Base Set Staryu and Starmie in the first GB video game inspired this. Staryu was a good attacker before I set up my Haymaker deck. Starmie was a waste that was worse than Staryu. The GB games could also be a source of content, they had a few unique cards that never saw TCG use.

@Fangs-jo4bq 7 ай бұрын

The new channel character image is really cute. And this video is amazing.

@nasayatcg 7 ай бұрын

A video about Poison decks would be fun I think.

@forgerofsouls9126 7 ай бұрын

I'd personally place Energy Remove in #1 over Super Energy Removal, simply due to how absurdly easy it is to use and abuse. Sure, removing 1 energy can be seen as not effective as removing 2 energy. But, if all you have in your hand is a single Super Energy Removal, and you have no energy on your Mon or in your hand, it becomes pointless in your hand, which gives the enemy a huge advantage. But, that is not the case with Energy Removal. There is also cases were your enemy only has 1 energy out in play. Getting rid of one energy might not be as good as getting rid one energy even if you have a replacement energy. For, in that case, your opponent might also simply have a replacement energy. And in the early meta? Sometimes, all you need is one energy. But, that is just my personal take on the two. Both are super useful and deserve the top 2 slots. One could argue that both deserve to tie for #1 as well.

@pentagonofpeople 7 ай бұрын

Always hated energy removal and thought it just shouldn't be in the game (or at the very least MUCH rarer, like land removal in mtg)

@gabrielcastillo9745 7 ай бұрын

Energy removal has been heavily nerfed in the past years (thankfully). During the sun and moon era, there were like 6 total energy removal cards between items and supporters. Also, more and more decks now accelerate energy from the discard pile, so it is not that bad.

@MindofInstincts 7 ай бұрын

11:11 Why is this here when Lost Remover exists and does the same thing except puts energies in the lost zone which is better than the discard pile? To give a specific example as to why its better, playing against TDK, using LR would be far superior than Enhanced Hammer since Thunderous can accelerate special energies from the discard pile when it can't from the lost zone. In fact I don't think there is any possible way to get any card back from the lost zone.

@Mitjitsu 7 ай бұрын

Even though cards existed to get special energy from the discard back into the deck. Their play was practically non-existent, when Lost Remover was around. I did run Lost Remover during it's time and I found it was often a dead card. Especially early game, which is annoying when you're forced to discard it to draw into more cards.

@MindofInstincts 7 ай бұрын

@@Mitjitsu I heavily disagree... it was my tech against TDK playing VirgenCel. Kyurem one shots with 2 Deoxys in play + Silver Mirror and Genesect can't 1 shot Kyurem withouting using G Booster which discards 2 cards and only taking 1 prize card. That's why I play LR so that I can loop it with Junk Arm to take out a lot of their energy which will eventually burn them out of a certain type. It's still an unfavorable match, but makes it from an autoloss to decently winnable. Also yes Ik he's talking about Standard and I'm talking about Legacy, but in previous videos he has talked about card viability in Expanded, so why not Legacy? There might not be as many decks that run LR than decks that run EH, but tbh I pretty much only played Legacy so I don't really know. My point is that they shouldn't be judged based on the format, but rather than what the card reads. You can't deny that given they were both legal at the same time you would chose EH over LR. At this point EH only is "better" because it was printed at a more relevant time, which is kind of dumb. I do sorta see where you're coming from though, but still a card that has a better effect should be ranked higher than a card that has a worse effect in meta. Edit: Also I did play it in two different control decks as well 1 being Snorlax block and the other being Snag claw Weavile. I didn't have too many Legacy decks (probably like 30 or so) but I'm sure there are a few more that also use LR. Not to mention the HGSS era that I didn't play might have had decks that used it.

@Mitjitsu 7 ай бұрын

@@MindofInstincts During 2013 Nationals, most decks were accelerating basic energy whether it be Blastoise, Darkrai or Eels. Outside of that specific TDK matchup Lost Remover was a dead card. There was also Accelgor that only ran DCE, but Lost Remover was useless against that as Deck and Cover shuffled it and all cards attached to it into the deck. Not to mention it ran Gothitelle, which blocks all Item Cards anyway.

@Mitjitsu 7 ай бұрын

Actually I just realized Lost Remover had been rotated out of the format by the time TDK came around.

@MindofInstincts 7 ай бұрын

@@Mitjitsu Both of yours comments are completely irrelevant because you failed to read my comment properly. I don't care about 2013 standard format, I'm talking about Legacy.