Will Killing Birthright Citizenship BACKFIRE?

[@D-ei1pc]

Wow the people asking questions about birthright citizenship must have their head up their backside. It's the 14th amendment that came after the slave citizenship. The video explained alot of things. No wonder the host left the country, he saw the writing on the wall a long time ago of how ignorant Americans are

[@AlbAy537]

Ignorants but everybody wants to come to 🇺🇸

[@jokerpilled2535]

@@AlbAy537only if you’re ready to work like a slave

[@gagoomt4076]

@@AlbAy537because traditionally it’s been very easy to make money and buy a home in America aka the American dream. That’s why people have wanted to come. Not because of the lovely pick up truck driving armed to the teeth Muricans. The dream doesn’t exist anymore inflation and monthly bills will kill any savings potential and $400k homes on 7% is not a dream thats a nightmare.

[@smartjackasswisdom1467]

​@@AlbAy537 lol no, just people who have it worse from were they're from.

[@SidResistance]

This man comes of as very genuine and he motivates me to get better

[@SANDSOFTRUTH]

Whether you support Trump or oppose him on this issue is irrelevant. The fact is that birthright is enshrined in the constitution (fourteenth amendment) of the United States of America. What people need to bear in mind is this. If Trump is allowed to override the fourteenth amendment and thus override the constitution, then what is to prevent him from overriding the second article of the very same constitution, and thus ensuring that there will be no presidential election in 2028?

[@MargaLilaandPets]

Who cares? He's doing what every American wants him to. Heck we are all envious and wish we had him in our country..

[@SANDSOFTRUTH]

@ What absolute crap. Do you MAGAS really find that much easier living totally divorced from reality?

[@visualsymphonybeats]

​@@MargaLilaandPetsno he isn't. Most Americans hate almost everything he's doing. He got less than 50% of the vote and a 3rd of eligible voters didn't vote, so I don't know how you came to that conclusion. Also, many people who voted for Trump are already regretting it. You can have him.

[@SCGMLB]

One mistake that people are making is they're saying that the children born in the US to foreigners would have the citizenship of their parent's country. That is SOMETIMES true, but not always. It depends solely on the laws of the parent's country.

[@munequa81]

Even if they did, it's not automatic. There's still a process to get ancestry citizenship.

[@SCGMLB]

@ That depends on the country in question. In many countries it’s conferred automatically. No application is required.

[@munequa81]

@ Oh thanks for the clarification.

[@legal.maxxing]

Not really, the United doesn't follow the principle of jus sanguinis, in which the newborn is granted birthright citizenship depending on the citizenship of the parents like in France, rather the country adopted the English common law principle of jus soli, where regardless of the citizenship of the parents, the newborn will be granted citizenship upon birth. This was illustrated clearly in the Supreme Court case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark as part of the interpretation of "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution but it won't be granted to newborns whose parents are (1) foreign diplomats, (2) parents who gave birth on a ship and (3) enemy combatants. The Wong Kim Ark principle has also been followed in another Supreme Court case of Plyler v. Doe and also other lower court cases. To me, it's patently clear about the position of birthright citizenship. However, besides that, Trump's decree of an executive action is tantamount to him exceeding his constitutional powers, similar to what happened in the Supreme Court case of Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co v Sawyer, where President Harry Truman signed an executive order to seize steel mills during the Korean War, which was deemed ultra vires and unconstitutional. Only Congress is allowed to amend the Constitution with a supermajority of both Houses of Representatives and Senate as well as the consent of 38 out of 50 States. Trump is not only dangerously testing the waters of the Constitution but also committing constitutional procedural impropriety as well as a contravening the Rule of Law and Doctrine of Separation of Powers.

[@bighacker4202]

Name one country on earth that doesn't grant citizenship by descent. Almost 90% of the world doesn't do birthright citizenship. This isn't something that's new and it's common sense.

[@kyleanuar9090]

I remember in the 80/90s Hong Kong expectant mothers would fly to US to give birth and get the child birthright citizenship

[@ticiamillermccloud561]

Yes.

[@DaveBuster-fu7el]

​@@ticiamillermccloud561it wasn't just HK mothers only it was rich and poor people from all over the world who could come to USA with a visa or illegally were doing it so parents can get it someday after child is 18 and over. It's disgusting what I saw 🤕.

[@WhatWhoWhere11]

Many Chinese did that. Even just before Trump signed the executive orders.

[@natinchile]

Actually, babies born in Chile do get citizenship. Many Russian come to Chile to give birth and they call it birth tourism. They stay about 3 months after birth and child gets the Chilean passport. They come back afterward and parents apply for permanent residency and subsequently the citizenship after a few years. You can check online, they have a website where they cater especially to Russians. 🎉

[@KangTheeImperiumOfPlanetOrdo]

links can be posted as well.

[@AlbAy537]

Are Chileans willing to offer the same treatment to Venezuelans? Asking for a friend

[@natinchile]

@AlbAy537 yes, if you are born in Chile you automatically get citizenship.

[@AlbAy537]

@ that was not my question 🤣🤣

[@Sinbad-1-0]

Andrew is going to be making bank these next 4 years. All this insanity is why it’s better to go where you’re treated best.

[@nomadcapitalist]

We’re here to help. www.nomadcapitalist.com/apply/

[@JuicerNation]

lol poors like us dont have an option. well some of us poors have enough funds to go to a shitty thirdworld country

[@DaveBuster-fu7el]

​@@nomadcapitalistAndrew that woman in the clip was nodding only to prove Trump's points. 😂. She was smart to keep her thoughts to herself ( I am sure she was saying to herself this guy is lying but how many people are dumb to believe in him ) 😂😊

[@SeanHendy]

Melania Trump - became a citizen of the United States in 2006, then sponsored her parents using the "chain migration" immigration process, a system that Donald has repeatedly criticized. Melania and Barron maintain dual citizenship (United States and Slovenia).

[@nightowl7261]

I heard Elon came to the states illegally..is that true?

[@SeanHendy]

@@nightowl7261 from what I can tell, he was born in Pretoria, South Africa. Moved to Canada aged 18, getting citizenship via his mother. Then ends up in California, '95 to go to Stanford, but never enrols in any classes. Gets US citizenship in 2002, probably as a result of his families money and investments/business building in the US. Certainly not the ideal Trump poster boy, but it's Trump so the irony will be lost on him and his immigrant wife.

[@redpillscience1288]

Did she go through the immigration process or sneak in?

[@redpillscience1288]

​@@SeanHendydoesn't matter he went through the legal process

[@SeanHendy]

@ it's obviously lost on many that Donald (second generation immigrant), married to Melania (immigrant), with Elon as his lap dog (immigrant), are bending over backwards to grab literally anyone that comes within reach, some, that 'kind of' qualify (to their criteria), to just grab them and deport, likely without any form of due process, and then there is the birthright thing.

[@ironpandaloco]

Renounce US citizenship to avoid paying taxes to Uncle Sam

[@KangTheeImperiumOfPlanetOrdo]

Only way to do it....however, you better either have made a significant amount of money on the way out OR you can work hyper remotely or have access to a network of family who live abroad already in various countries. Preferably 3 of the Schengen zone and 2 of the new BRICS nations to be pretty solid in your living. It's doable but will take at least several years.

[@winterfern4881]

I don't think any country should give citizenship to a child if their parents do not have the citizenship of that country

[@enjoystraveling]

I agree, the parents could be just vacationing in the country or transferring to another country by plane. Maybe there could be some exceptions such as parents that had a permit residence there and speak the language and our the road to citizenship.

[@net2dev]

Agree, child inherits parents citizenship.

[@MultiRocknroll123]

What about mixed status families?

[@buffalo.blackk]

@@MultiRocknroll123 Dual citizenship?

[@SCGMLB]

I'm OK with the way Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, and the UK confer their nationality to people born in their territory. They require at least one parent to be either a citizen OR a legal permanent resident (or whatever they call it in their country).

[@peterz53]

Naturalized US as a child, but German born to a German mother. In process of getting dual US German citizenship although not clear how I will use it except as a back up plan for this country going even more crazy and to give my children options. Dual will also open up the EU

[@nicholausbuthmann1421]

Damn Right ending Birthright Citizenship would backfire badly !

[@TheJonnyP54]

Say what you will about Australia but i think they strike the perfect balance in this particular instance - citizenship is granted to children of Australian citizens and/or permanent residents. For children of temporary visa holders, they are issued the same visa status as their parents/"best status" if parents on different visas and then the child can become a citizen after their 10th birthday.

[@nomadcapitalist]

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

[@lizzy9975]

Speak for yourself! Australia needs to tighten up and move to a system similar to Singapore. Renewing a permanent residency visa every 5 years and making actual citizenship a high bar to obtain would be a step in the right direction. And permanent residency should not just give your child automatic right to citizenship.

[@javelinblue5414]

All western nations need to close their borders.

[@Ninsidhe]

@@lizzy9975 you do understand the looming problem of failing Australian birth rates, yes?

[@Parthoo]

@@lizzy9975yes but Singapore still has birthright citizenship so that loophole still exists.

[@RobbsHomemadeLife]

The supreme court case you mentioned of 1898 giving citizenship to Asian parents should be clarified, borh Asian born parents were Legal residents. Neither Asian parent was an illegal immigrant.Why did you omit this fact?

[@CDRZK22]

I think he omitted it because it is in his best interest to do so. He is trying to make a buck afterall.

[@johnwoodham3263]

Because that "fact" was not the basis for the outcome of the case.

[@CDRZK22]

@@johnwoodham3263 It is implied that the parents are citizens, which is the point that was being made.

[@johnwoodham3263]

@ That had nothing to do with the outcome of the case.

[@MichaelJohnson-ip6xr]

Because he's a Trump hater.

[@saveandinvestwithgiorgiolo8375]

Excellent video Andrew.

[@professorprofessorson8795]

it will, US is already witnessing a population decline like every other developed country, removing birthright citizenship will make the country less attractive. US will grow slower or not at all....

[@Norm475]

Andrew, the countries you mentioned that give birthright citizenship do they give it to people who entered illegally? Or only to people who came legally? There is a big difference.

[@tecumseh4095]

The new born didn’t enter the country illegally

[@sashatz3387]

So you want a child held liable for the crimes of the parents. Awesome

[@tecumseh4095]

@@sashatz3387 That only exists in the bible not in the real world

[@evanolson7271]

@@sashatz3387 Not liable. Just gone.

[@sashatz3387]

@tecumseh4095 that's what the person I was replying to was making an argument for. Stop being thick

[@d.f.9064]

2:54 You've got Trump in one of his tens of thousands of lies, yet you move on without mentioning it. A president who is familiar with truth and facts is kind of important.

[@evanolson7271]

As has been stated elsewhere here, the real question is: Who else has birthright citizenship for the children of illegals? If you're here legally, then you are subject to our jurisdiction. Otherwise, no.

[@jdnw85]

Almost all countries of the Americas. If you enter illegaly Argentina and have a child in the Argentinian territory he will have the Argentinian Citizenship

[@johnwoodham3263]

Wrong, unless you think illegals are beyond legal jurisdiction the US. If they are, as you posit, then they cannot be deported.

[@NWstockoperator]

​​@@johnwoodham3263you are wrong. The framers of the 14th ammendment said jurisdiction of as defined in this ammendment means total allegiance to the US and no other countries. The modern dictionary definition of jurisdiction doesn't change anything.

[@NWstockoperator]

​​@@johnwoodham3263Senator Trumbull says that “subject to the jurisdiction” means: not owing allegiance to anybody else and being subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States.

[@johnwoodham3263]

@@NWstockoperator Wrong.

[@cheezee555]

I really appreciate your perspective and I'm learning so much from you. Thank you

[@nomadcapitalist]

You are very welcome!

[@livinglifeonfull]

Trump is talking about removing “birthright citizenship “ for illegal foreigners or anchor babies. He is not talking about taking away “birthright citizenship “ for Americans born in the US. Trump even has said the 14th Amendment was created specifically for decedents of slaves because at that time some were questioning whether the former slaves and their children were citizens. It was not intended for undocumented foreigners to give birth to children on US soil who then becomes US citizens. He says the US is the only country that does this.

[@essieessie5399]

Thank you! It's amazing how the Leftists twist Trumps words!

[@BamBam-g2l]

How do you think this will affect people? So many people will not be able to prove or keep their citizenship.

[@livinglifeonfull]

@ It is only going to affect children of undocumented immigrants or anchor babies. These children will get citizenship of the country of their parents

[@makisekurisu4674]

One you'll realize that people who thought they were legal might become illegal suddenly. Then what?

[@jthunders]

@@makisekurisu4674then Nancy starts the third impeachment and the Latitia James come up with new criminal charges

[@maddognick4761]

My question is :if your parents do birth tourism in the US and then you get raised in your home country and never step in US will they search you abroad for taxes?

[@cgiraffe9]

All comes down to their use of the US passport and social security number. That is how they would be tracked

[@quinntech7254]

Yes, they will. Seach KZbin for "Accidental Americans"

[@enjoystraveling]

They found previous Prime Minister Boris, who happened to be accidentally born in the United States and lived his whole life in England, but the IRS found them to get money when he sold his property And I have no time to look up the whole story

[@haggai3.477]

Bond Servants/ Debt Slaves. Anything or Anyone Registered with the State Belongs to the State. Wards of the State. Parens Patriae.

[@WhatWhoWhere11]

Take one’s chances If he/she doesn’t renew the US passport, doesn’t set foot in the US.

[@10000Islands]

No citizen parent, no birthright citizen.

[@shawn47240]

Sounds like someone hates the Constitution. Lol sorry about your racism, but the Constitution is more important.

[@SeanHendy]

This is apparently so deeply ingrained in the constitution that to even consider changing this is a waste of energy and time. It will never happen. As a spectator from across the pond, to the sh1tstorm that's happening right now, it is interesting that there is such animosity to immigrants given that some 27% of US citizens are first or second generation immigrants, and that INCLUDES Donald (second generation), Melania (immigrant), Barron (first generation), Elon Musk (South African, Canadian, US immigrant) and the list goes on. His ignorance to the irony knows no bounds.

[@lawrencetuider1177]

What are you even saying

[@glassman1533]

That’s very un-American. It truly is.

[@ItsOnlyFate777]

That's against the constitution whitch makes you a traitor.

[@kbyouknowbaby91]

Actually Andrew's favorite country does not allow birthright citizenship = Malaysia 🇲🇾

[@nomadcapitalist]

09:35

[@WhatWhoWhere11]

Yep, that’s how it should be.

[@JJsabenada]

Read the constitution. Birth in the USA makes a person a citizen. A change to the constitution is necessary if you want to change the law. So at this time I disagree with DJT and many of the comments. The USA is not the only country allowing birthright citizenship. If you are a believer in law and order, follow the laws. Not that hard to understand.

[@siaf2398]

Nope

[@AllyApril]

Yep. All Trump has to do is clarify the 14th amendment. No changes necessary. This change will happen. I cant wait 😂🎉 no more anchor babies

[@dozierstadium]

Trumpy is flouting laws, they do not apply to him in his mind, and he is teaching his followers as well that law and order is only a slight inconvenience. Our forefathers labored over this stuff, and he wants to discard it like a used pen.

[@enjoystraveling]

As I understand it, that law was originally made for African-Americans that were previously slaves to become citizens and their children that were born on US while.

[@enjoystraveling]

I meant to write soil not while

[@acebutter9241]

I was born and live in the Netherlands. My mother was born in El salvador and my dad is Dutch. I can get a Salvadoran passport because my mother was born there. Would it be a good idea to get a Salvadoran passport or are their risks involved?

[@jdnw85]

It is almost always a good idea to have an extra passport. In the cse of El Salvador i recomend you get it

[@alexandru5369]

an extra passport is always a plus i.e. you may never need it but it won't ever hurt you either. Trying too get a 3rd citizenship myself

[@crystalgarcia2143]

Collect as many passports as your government allows

[@SeanHendy]

To quote/paraphrase what the Supreme Court Judge said to the lawyer representing Donald on this, 'this is so ingrained in the constitution (birthright citizenship) that in the 30+ years of being a Judge, I haven't seen a more ridiculous or frivolous case than this'.

[@RobinSentell]

Why would any WOMAN who values her freedom want to be in Dubai?

[@net2dev]

My sister, she lives in Dubai. She's trying to convince me to move. She feels very safe and free to walk without the risks of doing so in the US.

[@pawlieblog7967]

Dubai is supposed to be safe for women. I lived in Libya as a child and as long as you are fairly modest in dress and don’t draw all kinds of attention (wear skimpy clothes and tons of makeup), you should be just fine. Dubai is pretty cosmopolitan!

[@Filip-ci3ng]

I thought you meant to say US

[@nightowl7261]

Get out of your comfort zone.....or not.

[@RobinSentell]

@@Filip-ci3ngI’m moving out of the US. I won’t move to a place where women are chattel.

[@3rdworldopinion420]

Jordan Maxwell - You and your birth certificate is traded at Wall Street ( NSYE =New York Stock Exchange) I asked a Broker about this and he said Yes it is True he tested it out with his own US Birth Certificate

[@nomadcapitalist]

If you haven't already, be sure to watch our latest-and possibly greatest yet-episode of Live Like a King, where we explore luxury living in the tax-friendly, family-friendly Middle Eastern nation of Oman. Here is your on-the-ground look at life in this "Anti-Dubai": kzbin.info/www/bejne/oWGnq5Sqmq52rrM

[@Joonrao]

Hey Andrew, I love the line “Go where you’re treated best”. That’s why I applied to a position of Creative Lead at Nomad Capitalist. Waiting to hear back. Unfortunately a lot of Indians in the US have voted for Trump, and most of the pregnant ones are now rushing to the hospitals to get an early c-section. Let’s Chat?

[@charleslueker2597]

Maybe Trump lied or is misinformed or had a brain fart - I don't know, but the more important point you made is that the interviewer did not push back.

[@sherman-j5j]

Actually Andrew US banking laws now have it that for any Canadian bank in the USA they have to report even their Canadian operations clients that might buy any US securities or investments inside Canada. They force those Canadian banks to issue a US tax form on those Canadians even if they never stepped foot in the USA. Scotia I trade I know for a fact does it as I received many notices for such trades made inside Canada not the USA. So any Canadian bank in the USA is now ignoring Canadian privacy laws and surrendering to the US laws private information of Canadians.

[@fakereality96]

I bet this kid's dad used to harangue grocery store cashiers about using a $2-off expired coupons for cat litter.

[@jayfig78]

That last part of your video makes very little sense. If you’re here illegally and you commit a crime, of course you’re going to be subject to criminal penalties. I know you don’t expect the legal system to operate in a way where if you’re an illegal alien, you get to do whatever you want simply because you’re not subject to the jurisdiction thereof. Bottom line, that small line in the 14th amendment (subject to the Constitution thereof) means a lot if we’re going to claim to follow the rule of law. And the moral reasoning to have such a stipulation in the law is so that you bring in immigrants that are loyal to and understand the traditions and values of this country. The great replacement theory is very real. People who rush to get here illegally, also bring their beliefs and the problems they voted for in their home country into the US. Legal immigration helps mitigate that effect and bring some balance to how the country evolves.

[@colberthunter12]

The former slaves were under the jurisdiction of the state and the Federal government, first they were property, then they were second class citizens who could vote but only be counted as 3/8 of a citizen, which puts them under the jurisdiction of the federal government for voting purposes, so the former slaves that were freed were always under the jurisdiction of the United States of America.

[@adrianosousamendes2948]

In the chinese case, his parents were LEGALLY living in the USA.

[@d.f.9064]

As usual, thank you Andrew. I appreciate your POV.

[@nomadcapitalist]

Thank you.

[@victormossiii1196]

I do not think birthright citizenship in the USA will end. Some of the US Supreme Court Justices might dissent, but for most of them, it will be decided for birthright citizenship. My son was born in Nicaragua, and his mother is a Nicaraguan and me an American, so he is a dual Nicaraguan 🇳🇮 and American 🇺🇸 citizen. The problem with taking birthright citizenship from people with visas in the USA, and give birth in the USA, is that not they are not permanent residents, but they still contribute to the US economy. Even illegal immigrants still contribute to the USA economy. Case in point, the produce prices are rising because those immigrants are not showing up to work because of deportation threats. ICE are targeting people for just speaking Spanish and looks like they could from Latin America. I am more worried when my son is older visiting family. Someone might be racist and prejudice trying to deport my son. I plan on buying plenty copies of his Consular Report of Birth Abroad (CRBA): USA birth certificate and USA certificate of citizenship for US citizens born abroad just in case of conflicts in the future!

[@blackjag121]

He wants to end it for certain groups, not all. Also he will give it to people he wants to help.

[@shonuffLA]

This is why we voted for him

[@JaeSwift10JamellaSwift]

YOU voted for him, not me!

[@shonuffLA]

@ yeah, that’s how voting works

[@carlosjose37521]

​@shonuffLA let's be honest...that's not the only reason YOU voted for him.

[@sherman-j5j]

Good for you! Trumps Tariffs against allies is for something else broader and not what he claims to the American people. In 2019, during Trump's first term, a private meeting took place between Trump and Putin on January 19 in Argentina (South America). Trump had the American translator removed from the room, leaving only the Russian interpreter to facilitate communication between him and Putin. In the weeks following this meeting, Trump made a media remark suggesting it would be nice if Russia had total control over all of Europe and its territories, while the United States would oversee all of North and South America. It appears Russia potentially may have set a trap for Trump, potentially activating it as he acts against American interests. Putin might have convinced Trump during that meeting to believe that gaining control over these regions American could significantly enhance his power. Unbeknownst to Trump, who has been criticized for having below-average intelligence, this suggestion was essentially a Russian tripwire designed to destabilize the United States and strip it of its reserve currency status. This plan would undermine Trump's rhetoric about maintaining the US dollar as the global reserve currency-a stance that seemed contradictory given his criticism of BRICS nations. In reality, such a position might have been a clever diversion by Russia for an even more sinister scheme to collapse the US economy. Russia could have carefully orchestrated this trap, hoping that Trump remains unaware of its consequences. If he were to instigate conflicts over territories like those in NATO (e.g., Greenland), it could trigger a civil war within the United States-a perfect outcome aligning with Putin's strategy since the USSR's collapse. By exploiting Trump's ambitions for power and territorial expansion, Russia might achieve its objectives while keeping Trump ignorant of his actions' broader ramifications. Trump's tariffs on allies like Canada, Mexico and EU countries could destabilize their economies, weakening their defense capabilities and creating vulnerabilities that Russia could exploit later, ultimately serving Russian interests. However, this scenario would ultimately render Russia’s influence in the US obsolete as a destabilized United States loses its dollar reserve status and plunges into civil conflict-exactly what Putin may have desired. In this new Cold War dynamic, Russia could emerge victorious by manipulating Trump to bring about America's downfall without him realizing it. Trump's threats against allies might serve as distractions while he lifts Russian sanctions and releases frozen assets, blocking aid to Ukraine. The following sequence of events might unfold: 1. The USA exits NATO under Trump. 2. The nation implodes into civil war as Trump attempts to deploy US forces against an ally. 3. The US dollar collapses by up to 70%, losing its reserve status while NATO countries dumping their dollar reserves worth $1.3 trillion to $1.6 trillion overnight. 4. Trump pushes for the UN headquarters to relocate out of the USA. Ultimately, Russia's long-term plans could be realized through a strategic maneuver that sees a naive leader triggering his own downfall.

[@shonuffLA]

@ obviously, again that’s how voting works. Are you ok ?

[@redpillscience1288]

His parents were subject to the jurisdiction thereof (meaning they were allowed to be here). Not from people sneaking across the border

[@BarbaraMia60]

My main concern is how to survive all of these financial and political crisis, especially in light of the US political power scuffle. The government has really called things more difficult for its citizens, and we can't sit back and bear all the consequences of the bad governance.

[@CallowG]

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

[@arthur1670]

1:19 does that mean you can apply for us citizenship via your parents? If somehow everything fails and you want to return home?

[@nomadcapitalist]

Mr Henderson explains his decision in this video 'Why I'll Never Return to the US': kzbin.info/www/bejne/r2LCeHmea9iCnbs

[@arthur1670]

I know I watched the video, but he’s always about options and 40 years is a long time, Many things could have in the would.

[@georgeinjapan6583]

Like it or not, this requires a 2/3 vote to amend the US Constitution.

[@fidel2xl]

Nope...the US Constitution (the 14th Amendment) does not require amending. Because the key phrase in the Birthright citizenship clause in the 14th Amendment (Section 1, first line) is "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof", is what President Trump is correctly focussed on. If President Trump's Executive Order is challenged in the courts, the SCOTUS can indeed rule in President Trump's favor simply based on that line, " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof". That line within Section 1 of the 14th Amendment, makes it clear that children born of ILLEGAL 'immigrants' on US soil cannot be considered US Citizens, since the parents (and the newborns) are subject to the jurisdiction of their own countries of origin. Now, yes, a Constitutional Amendment can eventually be issued to re-clarify the issue of Birthright citizenship (either re-enforcing the fact that children born on US soil to illegal immigrants are NOT considered US citizens; OR a Constitutional Amendment stating that those children born on US soil to illegal immigrants are considered US citizens) ---- but in the meantime, the often misinterpreted 14th Amendment already states that those children are NOT considered US citizens since they and their parents are not subject to the US jurisdiction.

[@Lori-db8vl]

NOPE!

[@leonlagrey]

Great video Andrew the more I think about it the more I do not want to put my child in the wrong country that's nuts! to put my child in the wrong... Killing birthright citizenship would be number one mistake on Trump end. This will be difficult to take rid of the 14th amendment, anything shows now that anything can is possible, For that time to prepare and move on out.

[@nomadcapitalist]

Thank you, Leon. We understand - having a solid plan for your child's future is important. At our event Nomad Capitalist Live, we bring together top experts to discuss second citizenships, asset protection, and strategies on how to go where you're treated best. You'll have the chance to connect with like-minded people who feel the same. We'd be happy to welcome you: nomadcapitalist.com/live.

[@JD-xo3xz]

Agree with the idea of not hiring US citizens vs other nationalities just on the basis of merit. Americans for the most part, have this entitlement idea that think they're the best at everything and should be hired over a non national. As a retired HR professional, I saw this over and over and mostly hired only those that had done their research into our company and knew our inner workings by studying our media posts, our business model and ethics, etc. Very few Americans went the extra mile and therefore not considered. When we did, it most mostly for lower level positions (admin, etc.). I see the problem worsening, as we instead of welcoming and utilizing foreign unskilled workers to fulfill the menial jobs (foodservice, general labor, etc.), they are becoming unwelcome and now WE have to fill those positions rather than focus on education and professional careers. We will inevitably see more physicians with unpronounceable names for better or worse.

[@Pocri485]

Anchor baby mommas are pissed!

[@MyraO-e6i]

maybe, they are pissed now, but they will thank god later, when US goes up in smoke!

[@ethxo6734]

You clearly don’t watch the video. The US is a hell hole and unless your coming from a dire situation your better off literally anywhere else.

[@ratracerugged7413]

A good question would be how many countries allow someone who is in their country illegally to give birth and have their children be citizens?

[@elokao8070]

He covered that. Most countries in North and South America, except maybe 2 countries. USA, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, etc. About 33 countries in the world offer birthright citizenship, which doesn't distinguish between if the parents have legal status or not

[@sibymiller]

My husband was born in France to legal American parents, but they came back to the US before his 1st birthday. I wonder if France will let him claim their citizenship 😕🤞🏻

[@ts-fr8hb]

No they will not. Unless the parents were able to remain in France on a resident/work visa and continue to reside for the required amount of years in France would the child after a certain age be allowed to apply. This is the normal throughout most countries in the world although there will always be variations. I was born in the 60's in the USA but both my parents were British citizens, but for me to obtain British citizenship I could only obtain it if my father was British. If it was the other way around through my mother I would not have been granted the citizenship. This has now changed from 1983 where its either parent. But if a child was to be born in the U.K or France of foreign parents the parents would have to remain and become nationalised for the child to be eventually nationalised also.

[@AD-oy8nm]

One of the places Andrew says is easier to become a citizen of than the united states - Dubai Here's the requirements... To become a citizen through naturalization, a foreigner must: Be fluent in Arabic Have lived in the UAE for at least 30 years Have a legal source of income Provide a police statement of trustworthiness Have a good reputation and not have been convicted of a crime A lot of you criticize the united states while turning a blind eye to how the rest of the world treats unwanted guests.

[@nomadcapitalist]

He never said that. He said unless you’re a billionaire investor, citizenship is very hard to get and may not be worth it.

[@AD-oy8nm]

@@nomadcapitalist But y'all advertise it as a place to go where you're treated best. Tell me a place that is so restrictive on citizenship how is that a place that treats you fairly. Unless your mom or dad is an emirati your child can't even get citizenship if their born in the UAE and could possibly become stateless.

[@CarlosMendez003]

Why does Trump lie so much? Can anyone who supports this man explain that to me? “America is the only country in the world who does this”. It takes 3 seconds to Google that there are many countries that have birthright citizenship.

[@enoughbs614]

That reporter never fact checks him. They have all bent the knee to a dictator.😢

[@UnimportantAcc]

The reporters are just morons

[@LadyIarConnacht]

Right because all normal world leaders let people wander in illegally, give birth and then roll out the red carpet, right? Totally normal.

[@Sage16226]

Cry me a river

[@metrocartao]

Not agreeing or disagreeing but It is unconstitutional and will not change, period

[@JoseTheRover]

What about the fact that it’s unconstitutional for Trump to make those changes?

[@NWstockoperator]

It's up to the Supreme Court to interpret the executive order

[@MichaelJohnson-ip6xr]

Was it unconstitutional for Obama to create DACA...that would be yes.

[@bunbohue369]

what he does is correct, you cannot just give birth in US and have citizenship. It has be require if one the parents also a US citizen.

[@andrewalmada]

I have said it for years. America has been granting citizenship to children that don’t even qualify by not having an American parent when they are born in the USA.

[@gloofisearch]

I think this is a stupid move and just to please the masses and make headlines. However, as we all know, the masses are uneducated and find this awesome and cheer for it. Important to understand is, when you are born in the US but your parents aren't US citizens, the child still would have to leave the US as soon as the parents have to leave. Furthermore, it would take 18 years, till the child is legally an adult to go back to the US and bring the parents to get into the process of naturalization of family members of a US citizen.

[@artempriadko6974]

USA Constitution: "Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Did USA cancel its constitution?

[@nightowl7261]

I support the right to arm bears.

[@NWstockoperator]

Illegal aliens crossing are subject to the jurisdiction of the country of their citizenship. Their allegiance is with their own country

[@Noir85Acutual]

I am american veteran have a daughter with a paisa (Medellín) child born in USA easily obtained colombia Cédula and passport i obtained mine by living in an Aparhotel and then in an apartment in Medellín

[@Edalfredo]

This gonna piss many Trumpit's O MAGA voters, but my entire family brothers and sisters with just B1/B2 visa tourist visa went from my home country the Dominican Republic and have given birth to all of their children(25 in total new americans). We are somewhat of medium to high class family compared to most dominicans who are having rough time, we also have Spains citizenship so we all have 3 passports, the USA(EASY), The Dominican(By Blood) and the spaniard by spains grandchildren law to restore lost European citizenship because of Franco and the troubled times of Spain in the early 1900's(also by blood and complicated). Just 1 of my sister's children got her child stuck in the birth canal and ended up spending US$27,000 for an unplanned C-section, all the other children were just US13,000 via natural birth, so yes giving birth is freaking easy in the USA with a tourist visa, all my sisters huge pregnant belly's entered your borders and the border agent said absolutely nothing, they did not even asked them if they were gonna give birth on US soil, they all have given birth in Orlando, I think the hospital was called Winnie Palmer in Orlando that specializes in women giving birth. Orlando international airport is freaking easy to enter, the border agents are mostly women and they don't ask questions or how much you gonna stay in the USA. Birth citizenship should be just as the Dominican Republic, just by blood, or a mother or father or both should be Dominican before the kid comes out of the womb, US citizens should help Trump look for a legal way to stop this craziness, in other words, even i get it, it's so easy, your system/constitution is broken, getting a 10 year US tourist VISA is easy as hell, i don't remember the last time i ever heard of a Dominican friend or colleague that their VISA request at the consulate was denied, those guys just give VISA's like cookies, as i said your constitution on that side of things is broken.

[@levongoldsborough9235]

Very Wise man

[@wachtwoord5796]

How does it work with combintions? I mean US couple living permanently in Malaysia. The give birth to a child which wont be a Malaysian citizen (cause they decide by blood) nor a US citizen (cause they decide by birth location). But the child cant be stateless can it? What happens?

[@nomadcapitalist]

Parents can convey their citizenship to a child wherever it is born. If a country doesn’t allow dual citizenship it may be required to choose at adulthood.

[@wachtwoord5796]

@nomadcapitalist interesting thanks! Does that apply internationally in general? That means that jurisdictions with jus soli effectively also have jus sanguinis (at least for such cases) right?

[@waterspray5743]

​@@wachtwoord5796The US also has Jus Sanguins so children of expats also acquire citizenship with some paperwork.

[@Mahen-j7c]

Agree witg trump

[@phillyboylaboy]

Saves one from cit based taxation 😂

[@shadowone01x99]

How many countries allow Dual and Triple citizenship?

[@deplorable2767]

Love 🇦🇲 Armenia ❤

[@nomadcapitalist]

You may be interested in viewing Live Like a King in Yerevan: kzbin.info/www/bejne/hIHJk2ynidWtgaM

[@gsup3874]

He's hoping it goes up for a challenge in courts. Its over if that happens

[@barbarasummers280]

I wonder how I find out my Great Grandfathers birthplace, as he was born in so-called Croatia in the 1840's so, Austro-Hungarian empire, How do i sus that out?

[@colberthunter12]

And why did he stay in the United States of America? So technically you are not a citizen.

[@lorinmactrinity]

What about a person born abroad to a U.S. Soldier and a foreign national during his assignment?

[@adamtaintbury]

Madame Butterfly

[@enjoystraveling]

In my opinion, if US soldier had a child or was a father of a child in a different country than the United States then the child should still be an American and not a citizen of that country where the baby happened to be born. The baby would have no ties to the country, would not speak the language, and would not know anybody in the country because the parents would be transferred back

[@DrSergeantNash]

That’s me. Citizen born abroad. They allow the non-citizen mother to bring evidence to a US embassy and get the child to claim citizenship. The child can be a free dual citizen, especially in countries like the Philippines

[@ut_punkn1859]

​@enjoystraveling incorrect, if the mom is German and the Father is a US Citizen then they should be born with Dual Citizenship.

[@philipjohn1338]

The Child will be a US citizen

[@mray8519]

Trump is 100% right on this.

[@rivenoak]

a president cannot change constitutional law; only trigger a process. even if it leads to "amend the 14th" it is not retroactively.

[@patlynch6517]

Very informative video! Thank you! Have a great week!

[@nomadcapitalist]

Thank you. Have a great week too!

[@bernadettesemple9301]

wrong wrong wrong...did you read the diliberations??? that was not the intent.

[@rod6722]

3:04 Savage!

[@frederickcampana5717]

My dad was working abroad in saudi arabia. My mom could not work there she was a stay at home mom. I was born in saudi arabia and have no citizenship there. I am an american citizen born abroad. This makes sense to me. Why do we not get it in the usa?

[@jingojingo1]

So if you end it, can you run for president if you are not born in usa? Seems like it to me.

[@jonnyutsa1]

Overall good video. However you don't understand the meaning of "subject to the jurisdiction." It means are you permanently domiciled in the country, and without loyalty to another country. The meaning was thoroughly debated in the passing of the 14A and can be read in the Congressional record. The case you referenced US v Wong had to do with Wong's domicile, in addition to the fact that he was born in the USA. Wong won the case because he proved he was in fact subject to the jurisdiction of the USA.

[@Anonymoususer-kz5xi]

So do you only work with people making 500k or more a year? Where does everyone else go?

[@nomadcapitalist]

Thank you for your questions! Our clientele typically have at least $1 million in liquid assets or a high six-figure income, so our services are tailored to their needs. If you're looking for advice, our videos can still provide you with valuable guidance.

[@riptyurass302]

I know Mexico has a lot of clout in this community, but if I were to choose to give my child Mexican or Canadian citizenship it would easily be Canadian. Mexico just has too much corruption to be a good place to live for everyone.

[@benjackson7872]

And yet more people are moving there.

[@riptyurass302]

@ yea, but it’s because it’s easier for people from South America and other less developed countries to migrate to. The same way Canadians have a deal to enter the US, Americans have many ways to enter Canada, especially to have a child.

[@AericAdams]

You're so helpful.

[@nomadcapitalist]

Happy to help.

[@KurtDesamparado]

We must ban it too in Canada.

[@KangTheeImperiumOfPlanetOrdo]

Hahahaha you have more land than people. Work on that building new cities and other infrastructure projects. You guys are sorely underdeveloped in a lot of ways more than one. Love the country but still it won't help Canada. You still can grow a bit.

[@pawlieblog7967]

Cannot stand this bozo in the WH again. Chaos time!!! Yeehaw cowboys!

[@skyeblue247]

well he’s correcting so much damage like open borders, child trafficking, human trafficking etc. i for one am willing to pay more for produce if it means migrants farmers are paid fairly and not exploited like they are now. so sorry you are against someone trying to right the wrongs! i’m a minority here and i agree with enforcing the law 100%. go to another country and try the BS illegals do here- they would be jailed or deported.

[@valeriebenson8770]

What the hell are we going to do? It's all out of control.

[@JuicerNation]

the adults are back in charge. thank god ALL minorities shifted to the right in a significant way

[@nomadcapitalist]

With all of this uncertainty having a solid Plan B can give you more control over your future. At Nomad Capitalist Live, we discuss strategies for greater freedom, and learning how to go where you're treated best. We'd be happy to welcome you: nomadcapitalist.com/live

[@VikingforLife-r5n]

No the UK did it and it worked great

[@robertmaxa6631]

The shot of "Temple Bar", in Dublin, brings back memories.

[@constitutionalcarrot3720]

You would honestly advise someone having a daughter to subject her to Saudi Arabian citizenship? The horror.

[@KangTheeImperiumOfPlanetOrdo]

You should visit the country.

[@nomadcapitalist]

Saudi citizenship is basically impossible to obtain. Saudi residence is possible and you can come and go when you please.

[@constitutionalcarrot3720]

My point is women couldn’t drive there till 2018. It’s a death sentence for your average weed enjoyer. I would not ever want to visit such a place.

[@AezlyndWanderin]

You are mistaken. Trump is correct. America is (now was) the only country who allows birthright citizenship to people born to non citizen parents who were in the country ILLEGALLY. All the other countries that have birth right citizenship require that you be there legally for your baby to get that birthright citizenship. For example, If a couple who both only had us citizenship were to sneak over the southern border and give birth in Mexico and then tried to claim Mexican citizenship for their baby what they would get would be deportation back to the US for both themselves and the baby and the baby would still only have US citizenship.

[@nomadcapitalist]

That’s simply inaccurate.

[@jdnw85]

This is false. In this case the child borned in Mexico will hold Mexican Citizenship. It doesn't matter the legal status of the parents. Many Venezuelans who could not enter the US are having children in Mexico for this reason

[@deplorable2767]

Illigal = Illigal I'm a legal immigrant and I completely agree with Trump.

[@NWstockoperator]

Bless you LEGAL immigrant You are welcome in the US !! 🇺🇸 🙏

[@TheSharkBand]

Good info - thanks

[@jthunders]

Wing Kim ark parents were permanent residents

[@naturesworld8399]

Jus Soli: the Americas. Jus Sanguinis: Africa, Asia, Europe, and Oceania. Uruguay has Jus Soli as well!

[@nomadcapitalist]

They do!

[@je7457]

Andrew: Enjoy your content, but you are promoting gross misinformation here. So-called “birthright citizenship” has been since Day One a set of lies agreed upon. 14A citizenship clause, as drafted and as passed was and always has been on the basis that it applied to former Slaves and their children, Period. The Wong Kim Ark case, as you incorrectly cite, held that children born here to LEGAL PERMANENT RESIDENT aliens are subject to the citizenship clause of 14A. It in no way shape or form held that children of illegals or tourists were citizens under 14A. Moreover, under existing federal law, children of diplomats born here are NOT subject to 14A citizenship clause precisely because they are not subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. I feel like our fake news media is promoting this misinformation to incite violence once our Supreme Court correctly affirms what many of us already knew, That 14A citizenship clause does not apply to tourists or to children of illegal aliens. Thank you.

[@klayd2929]

Oh man, trapped between the UK and US citizenships...now that's terrible luck indeed lol

[@Imozart0341I]

I’m so conflicted with this. Did the founding fathers know it would be abused with pregnancy trips? Then if the children is born with disabilities the parent can apply for SSI even though they never contributed to the pool?

[@D-ei1pc]

Since they founding fathers anyone born in the US was considered a citizen. It wasn't considered a bad thing until a fraud like Trump, said it was and his low iq supporters swallowed it up without thinking

[@cde3788]

I think the downsides of changing away from birthright will create more problems that it solves. Most Americans are Americans because they were born here. If we don't have birthright citizenship then what is every parent going to need to do to register their child for citizenship? It would be a bigger mess.

[@viktorivakhno2244]

We want your taxes, but you are not under jurisdiction 😂😂😂😂

[@rubenlaracuente8991]

GREATEST PRESIDENT EVER , ITS KILLING THIS GUY THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP IS MAKING AMERICA GREAT 😂

[@KangTheeImperiumOfPlanetOrdo]

It's actually going to give him more business @Rubenlaracuente8991

[@kylekern3833]

should native Americans still be allowed to be citizens by birthright in the United States?

[@rubenlaracuente8991]

@kylekern3833 NO!

[@kylekern3833]

@@rubenlaracuente8991 ah yes the people that lived in north America before the white man, your racism is showing...

[@barbarasummers280]

What skills do you need to have now? It seems that isn't really a thing anymore!

[@zanzillahsaruji9966]

Is Trump ancester from America...

[@hallimaali3752]

His mom wasn’t born here can we take his citizenship? Agent orange I mean.

[@strawberriesncandii]

His mother was legal. She didn’t cross the border illegally and give birth to Donald. His father was born and raised in NYC. So your argument doesn’t work. Just because someone has an accent and comes from a different country doesn’t make them illegal. SMFH

[@MH-et5sn]

No. Shhhh.

[@TheSharkBand]

Loser

[@toomanysecrets7121]

Aren’t you leaving the country? Even people who hate America continue to live there so he must be doing a good job

[@RobotechLegos]

@@strawberriesncandiisenior was the son of German immigrants in a town that talked about German and Irish the same way agent orange talks about Mexicans now. Enough with the hypocrisy. So do new immigrants have to hand out small pox infested blankets and shoot their way to the west coast claiming “manifest destiny” to be considered “real Americans?” Go back to using more Clorox on your white white sheets. You wanted to make America great and made it worse you horrible human being. You might as well do a colonoscopy on your dear leader while you are still in there.

[@BasketballBusinessAndBossMoves]

I like this guy. I thought he was a blind tribal right winger. I was wrong. He believes what he believes and he is fair, he calls bullcrap on both sides. I don’t even have to look…the MAGAites can’t handle him respectfully disagreeing with their God! 😂

[@garydorgan2399]

He goes where he's treated best™😂, whether that's on the right, or left, or some other corner of the globe, he knows it through experience

[@jthunders]

As opposed to your side with the wax effigy Biden or dumb bell Kamala

[@JuicerNation]

"thought he was a blind tribal right winger" lol i can tell you dont think too often

[@brianpereira7483]

The parachute baby