In this video Tuhon Harley explains why there are no sparring exchanges between a man who is armed and a man who isn't. A man with no weapons deserves no respect.
Пікірлер: 6
@kirvin2 Жыл бұрын
"A man with no weapons deserves no respect" tell that one to the judge.
@dimawhocares9884 жыл бұрын
Setting motivation speaking to whole different level!
@viperman24545 жыл бұрын
Awesome!!! Love it
@richardluntz61692 жыл бұрын
excellent vidio-
@davidrisselada619923 күн бұрын
So what you are saying is that sayoc kali advocates bringing a weapon against a man who doesn't have one? Are you sure, legally speaking, that's a good idea? I mean, maybe if the guy is bigger and stronger but even then, there are legal ramifications for going above and beyond the force required to stop a threat. It sounds like you are teaching people to go for the kill, and take advanatage of those that are weaker as opposed to laying out a logical use of force sequence. I am pretty sure if you enter in on a guy trying to punch with a cut that punctures the jugular, you will have to answer for it. Especially if others see it as your first move in response to the situation. The presence of the weapon is supposed to remind us why not to fight, not drive our ego. Once you decide to carry a weapon, particulary a firearm, your life changes and you must be willing to walk away from battles for the ego.