U.S. Navy Has a Nuclear Submarine That Can Destroy A Country in Minutes

The Ohio class of nuclear-powered submarines includes the United States Navy's 14 ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) and its four cruise missile submarines (SSGNs).
Each displacing 18,750 tons submerged, the Ohio-class boats are the largest submarines ever built for the U.S. Navy. They are the world's third-largest submarines, behind the Russian Navy's Soviet-designed 48,000-ton Typhoon class and 24,000-ton Borei class. Ohio carries more missiles than either: 24 Trident II missiles apiece, versus 16 by the Borei class and 20 by the Typhoon class.
Support us:
Facebook: / usdn.official
Instagram: / us_defensenews
If you have any problems viewing this Video, please report it here: [e-mail]

[@chrisluttrell2859]

There is much more out there that we know nothing about, and will never know about until the day they use them! Pray that day never has to come!!!

[@earljohnson2113]

I hope we have really fantastic interceptors too.

[@creescrazylife901]

I really don’t think we have shit on Russia. I pray to 🙏GOD🙏 I’m wrong!!! And if we have good interception technology, we don’t have enough.

[@chrisluttrell2859]

@@creescrazylife901 you dont have to worry about Russia much here at home, we have much more suffocated weaponry thank to Trump that is, only problem is having the right guy in the White House to use them without hesitating!! But I'm with u I pray we never have to find out!!🇺🇸💪💯

[@earljohnson2113]

@@creescrazylife901 I think you may be correct. But, Russia is a poor country. Maybe they are just BSn us on the amount they have. I hope.

[@Desekratedd]

@@creescrazylife901 amount doesn't mean everything. It's all about how effective they are. Also, both probably have a shit ton more than what the public knows or what we 'think' we know.

[@imperial3469]

In a world where sea monsters don’t exist, we built our own.

[@antoniomontana9430]

Yup...my US Navy veteran friends who served as submariners call these subs "Krakens" and for a very good reason.

[@almVancouver]

Best comment I've read in awhile. Bravo!

[@fordpopular8792]

My dad, as an eighteen years old sailor, served on a submarine at the BATTLE OF JUTLAND in World War One, from May 1916 to June 1916. His brother serving with the Guards Division was 'lost' fighting on the SOMME

[@brahilly]

We honour their service while we strain ourselves to find a way that overcomes war. New thinking and new faith is needed. My father fought in Holland in WWII.

[@danielrafreddy]

Submarine in world war 1 ?? Really ? Wow I thought submarines are started use second world war onwards . U2 boats . I never knew the submarines had a very vast history

[@NC.237]

He was a hero, we salute for the fallen of The US Army

[@harleymiles9926]

I wrote a 16 page paper in college about the Trident submarines. This was in 2003. From what I remember each sub has the capacity to take out an entire hemisphere. I want to say each had 24 missiles with multiple warheads.

[@boostjunkie2320]

Ohio class submarines have 24 hypersonic missiles trident d5 with 8 nuclear warheads each can be sent to different target's. enough to wipe out all Russia and China. there is 18 of those subs

[@ralphharper2414]

You're right each missle can have 10 1.5 Megatron warheads

[@boostjunkie2320]

@@ralphharper2414 actually they are 475 kilotons each and can all be sent to different target's. that's 8x24 475kiloton nuclear warheads on just one sub there are 18 of those subs. that's 3456 475kiloton nuclear warheads enough to wipe out all of Russia and some

[@ralphharper2414]

@@boostjunkie2320 the one we had were 1.5 Meg on trident c3 on an old Franklin class boat

[@boostjunkie2320]

@@ralphharper2414 the Trident 2 D5 holds 8 475kiloton warheads on the Ohio class submarine

[@thepearl28]

It is sad that we as humans even need such a weapon

[@sincitychris]

If people Stopped hating America for no reason and we’d have no reason to do this.

[@johnmoore9862]

So it’s all the fault of every other country?

[@thepearl28]

@@johnmoore9862 it's not any particular country's fault. It's humanity's fault. It's a flaw in our DNA and genetics that makes us this way

[@johnmoore9862]

@@thepearl28. That is a much better reply than SinCity’s comment. It does seem we all have deep deep tribal attitude & are programmed to dislike others who live differently from us, & that applies to all.

[@craigfoster294]

Wake up. Human beings kill each other. It’s our nature.

[@Doginthesleep]

The crews aboard those subs have nerves of steel. I can’t imagine what goes through the minds of people at stations like these in times like this.

[@GWS-schouwen]

You are right. But we do feel the nerves! I served on a Dutch submarine. Walrus class. In a NATO exercise we attacked many ships, including sinking the U.S. aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt CVN-71 after two attacks and we managed to sneak away. We also sank many of the Roosevelt's escorts, including the nuclear submarine USS Boise, a cruiser, several destroyers and frigates, plus the command ship USS Mount Whitney. After many stressful hours the celebration makes it all worth it.

[@tomkiley6370]

I served as a Missile Technician Chief on the Ohio, and 3 other smaller SSBNs. It is dedication to duty, pride and professionalism that drive us. The Ohio and her 'siblings' have been out there since the early 1980's. And yes, they could do what is said, although the men and now women would only do so on the orders from the President.

[@doloking7667]

@@tomkiley6370 shipmat those of us on the floating city above admire you and appreciate you all. Anchor Up

[@minerran]

@@GWS-schouwen I assume the Carrier and its escorts was expecting your attack and was listening for you, but failed. Reassuring for you, not so much for the sailors on the carrier.

[@GWS-schouwen]

@@minerran That's right. They knew we were out there, but didn't detect us and expect us from the direction and place we came from. I think the strength of this class, besides the fact that these subs are small and silent, that they are very good in undeep waters while American subs are good in deep waters of at least 200m/650ft.

[@johnstuartsmith]

The U.S. Navy doesn't have "A" submarine that could destroy Russia, it has 14 of them. France has another 4 such submarines, as does the U.K. The very expensive policy of nuclear deterrence through a credible committment to massive retaliation is cheaper than the conventional wars it has prevented. It's a hell of a way to keep civilizations from destroying each other, but it's the best we've come up with so far.

[@SuperRtrtrtr]

Russia's navy is significantly weaker no doubt. Their strength lies with their huge amount of mobile land based Topol ICBM's. Just as effective but far less expensive. Biden is very wise not giving Ukraine the capabilities to attack Russia beyond their border. Russia's invasion of Ukraine has gone poorly to say the least but they have always been willing to accept massive losses in order to achieve victory. They've already inflicted $960 billion in damage on Ukraine. It's going to be a very long winter for them. No matter how long it takes, Russia will prevail.

[@jbqu3142]

i may be wrong but if we're talking about Virginia class subs, the navy has 21 of them, 20 are active.

[@JamesJustice-rs5yc]

W E R U L E

[@j.j.anthony1200]

Such a awesome weapons platform, I'm happy that they're a US weapons platform and allied to the UK.

[@barbaraedwards4802]

Exactly! Imagine iff russia or China had such a weapon.

[@acidpilled8733]

@@barbaraedwards4802 They do tho, both sides would be annihilated within hours

[@barbaraedwards4802]

@@Lubet0TheGreat we will see how good the Russian and Chinese subs are when the yanks knock seven bells.out of em, lol

[@Anglo_Saxon1]

Excellent.Really great to see my U.S. brothers, operating a top notch submarine deterrent along side us Brits 🇬🇧🇺🇸

[@jeffparker9791]

Hey Karl, we are in this together, brother!

[@Anglo_Saxon1]

@@jeffparker9791 Absolutely mate!👍

[@jonathannoonan8596]

🇺🇸 🤝 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 friends for life, hope you're all keeping well

[@Anglo_Saxon1]

@@jonathannoonan8596 Nice one mate.All the best from over the pond! 👍

[@ttouds9583]

well, unfortunately there is "MAD" . Meaning, you shoot they shoot back and all is a part of history by then

[@delopez1966]

I served on the USS Michigan SSBN 727 Blue Crew from 1987 to 1989, as a nuclear reactor operator. She was still a FBM sub back then. She was converted from an SSBN to a SSGN during her refueling overhaul at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard a few years ago. SSGNs are outstanding theater/tactical platforms; not to mention the spec ops capabilities that they now provide.

[@allanr6132]

As a lifelong resident of Michigan I thank you for your service.

[@Nate-ln1qk]

And your point is what?

[@Rocks123]

Thank you for your service I can never express how grateful I am to you God-bless and wish you the best of luck in life

[@patrickbukowski9667]

What was your rate?

[@delopez1966]

@@patrickbukowski9667 ET/RO

[@davidhefner5668]

It's not about who can destroy each other in minutes but rather the defensive measures against it.

[@Rich-yj4ub]

There is NO defense against incoming Missiles. Only 100 need to make it around the Globe 🌎 to end the human race.

[@ban5176]

*Submarine that can destroy country in minutes* Me: Ah yes, destroying Vatican seems very difficult

[@jeshkam]

Go US Navy! Regards & much love from your ally, Poland! 😍🇵🇱🇺🇲😍

[@ralphscholz9533]

Bad news everyone. ANY nuclear armed submarine these days has the capacity to destroy almost any one country. Ours, theirs, anyone’s. Nice world we live in, isn’t it?

[@Dobrulez70]

Like all defense, better to have than not to have

[@nafets6265]

@@Dobrulez70 That's why those north koreans build nuke. The usa cannot push into their land without the threat

[@gainmoremarangwana7800]

We are tired of this ...this one has this one has this one has even North Korea has ...if it is the end ww will die

[@Zimmerframerate]

13.8 billion years to get here, and this is the best we could do with the gift.

[@JamesJustice-rs5yc]

According to God's word earth has only been here bout 6000 yrs

[@Zimmerframerate]

@@JamesJustice-rs5yc 🤣

[@Nic-ye2yz]

@@JamesJustice-rs5yc According to men*

[@ronluke7156]

The US nuke takes few minutes to destroy Russia while Russia takes few seconds to destroy the US.

[@michaelsburger665]

nobody wins

[@cfranzoso]

I served on the Ben Franklin, SSBN 640 (G) from 87 to 91 (part of the 41 for freedom). I went on a Trident once...amazing compared to the boat I was on

[@georgeortiz2631]

I docked and worked on the Benjamin Franklin down at KingsBay ,Georgia when I was stationed on the USS OAKRIDGE and then undocked.

[@NC.237]

Thank you for your service Sir🖖

[@RoadRunnerProduction]

No one asked

[@cfranzoso]

@@RoadRunnerProduction No one asked what?

[@jwm05281971]

My cousin was on the Ben Franklin about that time frame, not sure if blue or gold crew though

[@xxxdids]

Can you send one of these to my wife’s kitchen, her food is killing me. 😆😆

[@queenofswords6463]

Weird that we never hear of Russia and China saying “we’ve got this! We’ve got that!”

[@averyrandomdude7468]

To the point the U.S makes this stuff unclassified scares me more, I probably think they have someone in replacement or something better then the submarine mentioned in this video.

[@paulroberts7429]

Greatest submarine of all is Russia's 700ft double Titanium hulled super quiet K-329 Belgorod put to sea in 2023, carries 6 Tsar bomb type Poseidon torpedo's with a yield of 100mt, unmatched by any nation.

[@monte0878]

The Trident II SLBMs actually have up to 15 MIRVs. They only carry 8 due to START treaties. Yet, if we ever used them, we certainly wouldn't be worried about treaties...

[@KrGsMrNKusinagi0]

that wouldnt destroy any country.. people over estimate the blast radius of these weapons and fallot.. Its hillarious people live in the cities that were bombed by the USA in japan.. :)..it only takes a few years to recover not decades

[@TheRealist1.]

My dad told me about Trident III when I was 6... I'm 40.

[@mikec3454]

@@KrGsMrNKusinagi0 yes that’s true, but that was also in 1945 with a much smaller warhead in relative terms. In the event of an all out war, you’d have hundreds (or thousands) of much more powerful nukes blowing dust and debris into the atmosphere. Nuclear winter is a real, and terrifying, outcome.

[@johnfrancis2215]

What scares me is sooner or later a technical problem could set one off, it nearly happened in the state's I believe

[@vladimirputin9308]

typhhon

[@rustyjake953]

U.S. keeps its cards close to it's chest, wouldn't be surprised if they have alien technology too.

[@linkqui7]

Area51 👌🏻

[@Boozoobajou1]

They have.

[@Mustafa_Hussain_777]

Alien technology of flying on a broom. 😂

[@johnlopez1604]

LOL first build hypersonic weapon, Russia is far far ahead of USA in nuclear weapons,hypersonic weapons, missiles defense system, iCBM technology, USA nuclear weapons are 15 kilo tons while Russian are 50 mega ton, Russian nuclear bombs are far far damaging than USA, and also Russian iCBMs are faster and can go longer than USA, Russia is the one who built rocket engines to usa. Your own generals said the USA have no defense against Russian hypersonic weapons. What a joke.

[@rustyjake953]

@@johnlopez1604 Russia's nuclear capability is ancient like the rest of it's military. That's been proved in Ukraine where they took a battering by western armaments. U.S. and Europe have a missile defense system, better intelligence, quicker response, Russia would be annihilated before it's first hypersonic intercontinental missile even enters orbit. United States will never advertise it's capabilities, like Russia, because this is a sign of fear. The two militaries are miles apart, U.S. main adversary isn't even Russia, it's China. Russia is now a bankrupt state.

[@sandere6593]

I feel more safe with the U.S. as or most important ally. Thank you!🇳🇱🇳🇱

[@charlesmangold9701]

i serviced on the USS SAILFISH 1970 to 1974, HAD orders to the US JAMES MONROE, BLUE CREW, ORDERS changes went to one of the last diesel subs.

[@Mr91495osh]

I was in NUCSUBLANT in the late sixties. I was assigned to the USS HUNLEY AS31. We had NUC SUBS tied along side for repairs and replenishment. These were bad ass subs.

[@patrickbukowski9667]

Von Steuben (Gold) 77 - 79 refits out of Holy Loch, Scotland.. real nice place!

[@patrickbukowski9667]

nucsublant??!!, that is funny, and no such thing!

[@randalljohnson8293]

Thank you for your service @ G. Howard. US Army 1977-81

[@revo1336]

Small world , was an ELT on USS LAFAYETTE gold SSBN 616 , 3 patrols out of Holy Loch . Fish and chips every other night. Pints of heavy 69 pence.

[@Jacubamustoff]

Thank you for your sacrifice

[@robjtko]

I’m talking about all militaries when I say this. It is crazy, even scary amazing when you see how far mankind has come with technology in just 100 years. Maybe its just me but it seems like in the last century man has had an explosion in the tech world. And thats only considering what we know about. They are usually many decades ahead of us, the general public.The first “Powered,” flight was less than 120 years ago. 1903 to be exact. In far less than 100 years we went from flying 20 or 30 MPH to flying well past Mach 1 which is the speed of sound. Close to 750 MPH. If you want something perfected, turn it into a lethal weapon. Man will devote every dollar and every hour to making it even more deadly. I think its pretty obvious where we are headed.

[@JamesWilson-vt1xg]

You are right on the money with your comment,Thank you for your insight.

[@celtickshatriya4306]

Yeh even the last 50 years unbelievable tech (mind blowing).

[@DanielBrown-sn9op]

Sad, but true. Everything technological has changed......But WE havent.✝️

[@Rocks123]

You're absolutely correct what a very intelligent man you and you are God-bless and hope all is well

[@marcelkuiper5474]

We are nearing the crescendo of this , all this will culminate into either a dystopian hell on earth with AI dominating and enslaving us or wipe us out entirely. And Jesus is coming soon :D

[@carlosmagana5775]

The problem with Nukes is that when it happens the survivors will envy the dead

[@rocketscience4516]

Not England - the United Kingdom. The UK's nuke subs aren't even based in England. They are based in Scotland.

[@paluszter]

"“I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.” A. Einstein

[@earljohnson2113]

WOW.

[@darrenwestley7348]

Nice One

[@scotttild]

He was wrong because everyone will be dead. RAD will contaminate the water and soil, crops will not grow and die and anyone that is left after the first strike will either kill themselves or die of starvation or radiation.

[@country3608]

Thank you for your service and sacrifice for our country and it's citizens!👍🇺🇸⚓️🇺🇸

[@Glen.Danielsen]

Like nothing else, these U-boats give peace of mind to me. I hope we can stay ahead of Communist and Arab technology in submarine stealth and missile tech. God bless you U.S. Navy submariners. 💛🙏🏽

[@Nanw23]

Actually, this has avoided WWIII for almost 75 yrs or so !

[@pkope6849]

Thank You to my fellow Sub Sailor's.. Run Silent / Run Deep !!! 🇺🇸

[@robbpendergraft5933]

God bless all of you brave men and women that go out daily and risk your life to protect ours. You guys are the real super hero’s 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

[@lesdarcy813]

😂🙈

[@liquid_shadow8690]

Yea… it’s chilling to think it’s actually possible in this day and age. Pray for peace and be kinder to one another.

[@rherrera4177]

Even if you surprise the US with a first strike, those subs are there to make sure you pay the price.

[@patrolmanracv]

the Russian And Chinese navies far outnumber what the US have in nuclear armed Subs ..

[@chrisiman2637]

Although that is a fact-based statement.... The U.S. would suffer horrendous loss as well. It would be over for both countries as well as the entire population of the Earth.

[@revo1336]

George Carlin: Earth will shake us off like a surface nuisance.

[@gpnulife]

Dude, they don't have anything that can reach us and we have the ability to stop anything far from landing on our soil.

[@francotrussardi2779]

@@gpnulife that's what you think. Why do you think they rise prices here so it may go to the military. Lot the government don't want us to know.

[@JCredTV]

@@gpnulife top generals in the US have stated in the event of a full exchange, MAYBE we could stop 30% of missiles, if we're lucky.

[@QuigleySharps45]

@@gpnulife The first mistake in war is under estimating your enemy. Now I don't believe the people of Russia are our enemy, but just like the USA, Russia probably has weapons not on the hooks and not known.

[@orrettpalmer9590]

I told the world 🌎 that the USA doesn't have to disclosed its world power... America just don't want war, America wants the world to be happy

[@charlesbrown9213]

@orrett - I think one needs to distinguish between the Permanent/Deep states of both Russia & the US (and the PRC too) vs. their people. The peoples of the world of course, do not want war. The Russian people certainly do not. But the Permanent/Deep states of both Russia and the US want what is in their "interests". Its clear Putin does want war with Ukraine, and their land. Probably Transnistria & Moldova too. Maybe the Baltics. He already has Belarus, and hegemony of Kazakhstan. But the US Permanent State too has a history of waging wars to further its "interests". --We were notorious for using force to further our economic interests in Latin America pre-WW2. And pretexts were arranged (Gulf of Tonkin, Iraqi WMD) for wars against N. Vietnam and Iraq. No elected or appointed officials were ever held accountable --- via the equivalent of a Nuremburg Tribunal for those "mistakes" -- keep in mind, 2 MM southeast Asians died from that conflict. And America just "forgets" to hold anyone accountable. ... American "mistakes" are often more bloody than Russian maliciousness.

[@ou812rsapp]

Great, I am smiling already!

[@patrolmanracv]

why 222 years of continuous wars then to control the world...

[@nicktarling7574]

Apparently one country has a submarine that can build a city in seconds

[@bobparvin9773]

This is a very good thing to have because it keeps the enemies wondering where the hell it's at.

[@BLACKSHEEP59]

Thank you all for the service and sacrifice . You deserve this nation's admiration and gratitude for all you do !

[@anisbbrahim]

@John Cliff lol u mean the bellarus of Putin or the israelíes immigrants/setters?! Stay home and do another job, actually u r worse, crazy Putin claims that they r defending thier borders but Bush and blair and their very well paid mercenery(paid soldiers r merceneries) traveled accross the globe for that!

[@maxcorder2211]

In 1971 I was a B-52 pilot assigned to alert duty. Our targets (2 bombs) were near Moscow. I don’t think we would have made it to our target due to their defenses, but since our arrival would have been much later than the impact of our nuke missiles, maybe we would.

[@earljohnson2113]

Interesting. I think you would.

[@MrNb131]

50 years latee and that scream of the b52 still intimidates the world! Can't imagine what it must have been like during those really intense years when Ivan was looking very scary

[@earljohnson2113]

@@MrNb131 Easily shot down these days though.....😕

[@MrNb131]

@@earljohnson2113 yeah this ukraine war is showing that big machines can be neutralized with hand-held weapons, whole different ballgame

[@earljohnson2113]

@@MrNb131 yep, lots n lots of simple stuff beats huge monumental stuff.

[@purebloodstevetungate5418]

Satellite cameras have become so powerful and coverage so extensive tracking them threw acoustic "ping" has become irrelevant .

[@michaelharrison7072]

Thankful.for Trident subs They kept.our enemies from nuke war And still do.!

[@CG-70]

US has a Marine Corps and one Air Craft carrier that could destroy both. Neither country can win a static war against the U.S. and they knew it

[@sa4769]

Scary weapon - basically one missile alone can destroy several cities.

[@earljohnson2113]

Please don't bomb the lingerie haul girls.....😕

[@dhurjatinarayangiri6995]

@@earljohnson2113 😝

[@QuasiELVIS]

Not really, it's a bit limited in how far and in which direction the warheads from the same missile can be targeted.

[@earljohnson2113]

@@QuasiELVIS close enough for Hand grenades and horse shoes and, oh...... Nuclear Weapons...🤔

[@SublimeNumbaNine]

@@earljohnson2113 are you talking about china?

[@marianoemert8734]

USA has intelligence, money, power and common sense. They never show off with ridiculous military parades to impress, for that is done by those who are afraid. I am sure that they will never allow Russia or any other tyranny to take them by surprise. I thank God that it is a democracy.

[@hunduns9901]

This is what helps me sleep at night😂🇺🇸☕️

[@josephyodiceyodice5990]

Two words - NUCLEAR WINTER We'd better learn to Love because no one will be left to Hate for very long ... God Help Us 🙏

[@bendike]

That is why Russian wants to be left alone. But no, the US pushes nato to their boarders to encircle them, poking the bear. When they plead and plead, no response until they react. And the Commedian in Ukraine does not know he is being used. He wants nato to confront Russia on his behalf and to start nuclear war.

[@joelgalvan8358]

18 empty middle silos ,a mushroom cloud. And it's Miller time.

[@metroman8185]

The Russians also have their own Typhoons too!!!

[@KepperKleen]

junk

[@metroman8185]

@@KepperKleen Donkey Face AOC HERE!

[@amutah8063]

Does Russia have submarines too? You should also tell your viewers that Russia has the capabilities to destroy the US in minutes.

[@imjusthere5225]

Yes U.S Navy has a submarine that could destroy Russia and China in minutes. But dont forget the Russian navy got a similar submarine, which carries 20 ballistic missiles of 10 nuclear warheads in each one.

[@donlofting4268]

Yes but made in China it'll probably be rusty by now

[@imjusthere5225]

@@donlofting4268 I do bet you will find a lot of made in china stuff in the US submarine aswell

[@DanOne1513]

Nuclear fallout from even one destroyed nation would destroy this world for thousands of years or more...three would be no winner...all human life would be extinguished and any life that would possibly make it underground would live to die there in their fancy coffins.

[@stewartsnape2936]

The destructive capabilities of these subs is unimaginable, and the equipment and technology on board. I think it would be a really cool experience to serve on board a sub

[@benrose7364]

This is what happens when UK and US put there heads together and make a super killer sub they both use! UK has a very similar version but the main point of these subs is the Trident missile system

[@NeverTalkToCops1]

Yes, YOU might struggle with that rope lash up thingy as shown in this video.

[@tigerjonn]

I couldnt handle being inside a small space for months on end.... I heard you need to pass very heavy screening and a lot of psychological tests to be able to serve on a sub...

[@stewartsnape2936]

@@tigerjonn thank you for your response, yeah guess it’s not for everyone I love the sea and it’s something different

[@roderick2105]

If German soldiers were tried and found guilty for following orders and killing civilians then what punishments should militaries face for threatening to destroy the entire world.I In this video the narrator proudly tells us that one submarine has the power to destroy the world several times over.This is complete madness!!

[@RyanStonedonCanadianGaming]

This meme sounds pretty useful right about now: Do it! Just do it! What are you waiting for, just do it!

[@Jacubamustoff]

U.S. Navy boats are SOOOO IMPRESSIVE

[@AbandonEarth911]

Yes Millions of humans live in Poverty in the USA. But they can spend Trillions on weapons of mass destruction.

[@ButlerProspect]

Regardless who has the best, if one launches its payload in anger, there wont be no families, relatives or civilisation left

[@cbing4036]

How do you know ?

[@Desekratedd]

Because he has a brain and it's common sense...

[@cbing4036]

@@Desekratedd Are you a nuclear weapons expert ?

[@Gopferteckel]

@@cbing4036 🤣

[@ericochoa4034]

You know if the shit did hit the fan and nukes were launched. I'm sure rich people living in there lavish shelters would still live like rats underground for awhile but after the bombs go off their supplies would eventually run out! Either way let's just hope it never happens and we don't let idiot crazy dumbasses like trump or putin kill us all!🤞

[@DFFno]

Destroy Russia in minutes...dude..did you take a look on the map? :D

[@rubenoteiza9261]

What's the big fuzz, that has been the case for half a century already.

[@bradleys4783]

Spend trillion$$$ to blow up the World. Great job fellas !

[@frankmueller6522]

Go forward, America! Long live the Nato! Long live freedom! Down with all dictatorships and terrorists all around the world! Best wishes from Germany!

[@robertbrown374]

Lol the USA will be happy to dictate to you when to fight and die so they can get rich on your dead family. They will sell you out like after ww2

[@rohzpopper4922]

What freedom ? NATO oppressed other nations. Bombs and killed hundreds and thousands of people for Zionist Israel sake. Because of stealing Arab land and established Israel, MiddleEast are always in turmoil . Israel have free pass in killing unarmed citizens and bombs neighbouring countries with US funded money

[@imamanofculturepleasegivem5440]

@@rohzpopper4922 bro u need to sacrifice more lives to attain peace That's called collateral damage

[@tlsvd5842]

@ Frank Mueller we don’t want Nazi

[@jordancarpenter4093]

China has now more freedom than the USA and also China has now better weapons and higher technology than us USA according to the Pentagon China and Russia are allies and the new global leaders meanwhile We(USA) are in clearly decline now, in the USA the financial oligarchy elite run this country meanwhile in China the politicians are in power!

[@freddyram1969]

God bless America and its friends

[@vishalpatil-fy2ot]

Russia has a nuclear missile that can hit u.s land before they start there engine. At the end of the war no one win but everyone suffer 😔.

[@richardbergeron4383]

As someone who went thru the US Navy nuke program years ago, nothing will surprise me regarding the capability of our underwater Navy. I would not want to be the first hostile nation to test us!

[@soulabear9146]

😂🤣😂

[@teronmillen59]

@@soulabear9146 tf is funny

[@soulabear9146]

@@teronmillen59 Murican Arrogance 😂

[@auggieazure8633]

@@soulabear9146 compare US Military spending to others. Maybe you can see something there.

[@soulabear9146]

@@auggieazure8633 US Military Industrial Complex spending all that Monopoly Money, on faster ways of Killing

[@John-ym9ht]

Thinking that civilization will make it to 2085 is being really optimistic.

[@denym2209]

The problem is that Russia also has such submarines !!

[@scottrobinson2286]

Like there tanks....Junk.

[@denym2209]

@@scottrobinson2286 Waiting for you on your tanks....

[@scottrobinson2286]

@@denym2209 I don't understand your question, I'm worried for the poor Russian soldiers who's tanks get blown up easy,also there subs not to reliable with the recent tragedies in past.

[@denym2209]

@@scottrobinson2286 Russian tanks, unlike European and American ones, have an automatic ammunition loader, this is their advantage in battle and at the same time is a weak point, since the ammunition is located inside the hull and therefore, if a rocket or RPG is successfully hit, the ammunition explodes, and the abrams or other tanks, the ammunition is located in the back of the tower and there are special knockout panels, in addition, all European tanks and American tanks did not participate in serious wars against a modern enemy who has modern anti-tank weapons, so now it’s hard to say which tanks are more effective in such conflicts expensive abrams and leopards or cheap t 72s that were produced like Kalashnikovs.

[@dannywilliamson3340]

We've had them since the 60's......where have you been?

[@larrys9879]

Russia, China, and even North Korea also have the nuclear ability to destroy the United States. Thus the hope that the reality of mutually assured destruction will prevent a nuclear attack by any one, or combination, of countries. Unfortunately, some of these world leaders don’t appear to be mentally stable, and that is scary.

[@ajcso7844]

You sure? Unless Isreal and North Korea have secret nuclear weapons they do not have enough to wipe out the US landmass.

[@larrys9879]

@@ajcso7844 The radiation cloud, that develops after the explosion, would be spread by the wind. The radiation alone could potentially kill millions of people and make vast areas of land uninhabitable. According to scientific analysis that I’ve seen on KZbin. In any event the enormous devastation from the initial detonation and the spreading radiation poising would make survival unlikely for millions of people. The infrastructure would be destroyed by the explosion and the ability to get food, water, and medical treatment would be extremely difficult at the very least. It might be a blessing to die in the initial explosion rather than experiencing a slow and painful death in the aftermath, IMO.

[@ajcso7844]

@@larrys9879 Oh wait nvrm I misread the information. The estimate could go up to 100.

[@josifish4]

That won't stop any of the people you just mentioned. They are not stupid but they are mentally unstable and want to rule the world.

[@95ellington]

I remember a quote some where between the POTUS and the USSR General Secretary from the cold war: "I can destroy you a thousand times over. Yes Mr. President, but I only need to destroy you once."

[@HRHolm-bi6zu]

The overall number of both Trident subs and their nuclear-warhead missiles initially deployed has been cut back in the last 15 or so years as the boats' missions have been modified to some beyond nuclear launch, replaced by conventional cruise missiles. Or some missile tubes have been designated as subject to modification in order to serve as 'launch' pads for SEAL-type infiltration mission teams. The fewer subs to track, the more assets adversaries like Russia/China will have to look for and perhaps find the remainder, by default. The fewer missiles available to launch, the fewer that Russian/Chinese anti-missile defenses will have to contend with. Plus, the Tridents were never intended or built as first-strike weapons against hardened land-based ICBM sites---just like their Minuteman counterparts. So in the aggregate, the original deterrent value has been reduced to an extent that it is increasingly marginal. Likely still the strongest, most capable part of the overall U.S. deterrent, but a reduction in force has not helped.

[@goblin103187]

They would have a better shot at shooting down one of our B2's than an ICBM. And shooting down a B2 is damn hard. Basically it would take an extremely lucky shot.

[@earljohnson2113]

We'd better beef em up again.

[@tweekrseekr8816]

Finally, l a person that knows what is what, Hoo Ya! For those that don't know, that is what we said in Navy Deep Sea Diver training.

[@earljohnson2113]

@@tweekrseekr8816 I'm a muff diver. So Hoo Ya !

[@robertw1871]

If I was an enemy of the United States I wouldn’t make the mistake you just made… There’s more than enough in our arsenal to kill the entire planet 20 times over no matter where the detonations actually occur, the food supply of the entire planet would be contaminated within 96 hours and won’t return to an edible state for at least 60 to 150 years… no human would survive more than a few months… I’d say we still have more than plenty if we should need them… And if ours aren’t enough the other 15,000 that would be launched in retaliation would finish the job… I’d say you are very incorrect that it’s not every bit the deterrent is very much as strong as it’s ever been… And I wouldn’t be so sure there are fewer out there, the newer physics packages are tiny, many more than you think could be lurking in few delivery packages, and let’s not kid ourselves as to the number of devices in orbit shall we… And they don’t have to destroy hardened targets my man, they just have to get within a couple hundred miles of the grain feilds, that’s how they kill!

[@vedantchaudhari1859]

I think Russia's only one typhoon class submarine is good enough for us all nuke types submarines

[@paulchesney1798]

I believe the Chinese and Russia think the U.S. does not have the stomach for a conflict.Just as Japan thought in WWII

[@andreyg.2388]

Drop nuclear bombs on civilians knowing that there will be no response, as is the American way. But Russia and China are not Japan in 1945. Russia has more nuclear weapons than the US.

[@vinothmuthiah1666]

Russia propaganda that's all

[@speedmaster001]

@@andreyg.2388 Russia being broke?

[@andreyg.2388]

@@speedmaster001 Such unsmart question... Read more macroeconomics, I'm not gonna teach you.

[@amoryt5230]

@@andreyg.2388 Dude 760 Bilion$ vs 56 Bilion$ Defense system make a lot of diference 🥲

[@arbershqipri294]

God bless America and my country Albania. Love America from your brother Albania. 🇦🇱🇺🇸

[@dgarcia0rivera]

Pro tip: the US has a WHOLE FRICKEN BUNCH of SSBNs. Probably a bad idea to f around and find out.

[@Brian-bp5pe]

An ICBM is armed with multiple nuclear warheads. These are in the nose of the missile and they are contained within re-entry vehicles. So, if a submarine has 18 nuclear ICBM's and each ICBM has a dozen, or so warheads, one nuclear submarine is able to target well over 200 locations. These submarines are doomsday machines.

[@JP973-79]

GOD BLESS AMERICA…..🇺🇸🗽👍👍

[@francojustthat156]

As the Russians has the same, named the Deadhand...but we're all dead after all missiles of both country's submarine are launched...

[@waybee100]

you are over estimating russian tech.

[@johnfrancis2215]

@@waybee100 err they just sent a rocket into space, I'm sure they could hit a target the size of murrica

[@jeffbrooks8024]

@@johnfrancis2215 on a good day….lol. Which day depends on whether they remembered order the fuel delivery….lol

[@abbeyroad7901]

USA navy can destroy Russia in minutes while Russia can destroy USA in 30 seconds. Wow.

[@ThePsychoPearl__]

Ass kisser, we all know Russia is weak. Look at how civilians in Uk are demolishing the little Russians 😂😂

[@sheikhuzair24]

Russia be like "Haan bhai mai toh Vella hu mere paas kuch nahi" 😂😂😂

[@forward876]

There it is…” deter a first strike by any SANE. adversary”. We all know that “sane adversaries “ are mythical creatures.

[@brianstollings6416]

We spend more on our military than the next 7 nations combined. It’s safe to say this isn’t all we have either.

[@un-tq3xm]

3miltoiletseat

[@earljohnson2113]

I sure hope you're right. I'm thinkin that space shuttle wasn't going up back n forth just to study bees in space...😉

[@maharajamac]

@@earljohnson2113 or research on perfumes

[@masterchinese28]

If it makes you feel better, we spend nearly six times as much on healthcare. If we could cut that in half we could double our military spend AND pay off a $1 trillion in debt a year.

[@earljohnson2113]

@@masterchinese28 I know

[@isokabooks3758]

They don't call it MAD for nothing. Them what survive will envy the ones who died.

[@danballou2202]

Russia has them too. All of mankind would lose in a nuclear exchange.

[@tmilesffl]

Having worked on Nuke missiles, There is never a good solution to using them. Out unit had enough warheads to destroy the east coast of the US from Canada to the coast. And that was just our unit.

[@mckessa17]

Canada is a big country still no place to hide.

[@slowgoat6089]

Wow, what if one goes off accidentally

[@PHTV11]

Question, how does that firing of the weapons work? What's the process? What stops someone firing one off?

[@tmilesffl]

@@PHTV11 It takes multiple to fire a nuclear weapon. I won't get into details. No one person can fire a nuke.

[@tmilesffl]

@@slowgoat6089 It would not be a nuclear explosion. The warheads are not armed until they are launched. It takes a certain firing sequence for a nuke to go off. Otherwise, it is just the TNT that explodes. But it will leave radiation scattered about, just not the same level as a nuke detonation.

[@tamerlane7]

I’ve heard U.S military experts say that the U.S can’t fight Russia and China simultaneously. Watching this clip gives us hope.

[@frankcastle2045]

🤣🤣🤣 sure

[@harbselectronicslab3551]

The US could fight them both from their chairs at the super bowl........

[@tamerlane7]

@@harbselectronicslab3551 Hahaha

[@weigangfu8826]

Your hope means the doom day

[@tamerlane7]

@@weigangfu8826 It is the dooms day the way things are heading.

[@stevestarr7229]

Audio should say the cost is four to six billion to manufacture, not 4 minus 6 billion

[@righteousbyfaithinChrist]

Nothing, is as powerful, as the Word of God... spoken through the mouth of God.❤️🇺🇸🙏

[@RK-bj8ho]

They would have similar weapons as well, so its not any huge advantage

[@terrylew2209]

Thats the thing people need to absolutely understand. Nuclear holocaust is a lose/lose situation. Period.

[@USAMontanan]

“They” have junk

[@thanikk990]

@@USAMontanan that "junk" is enough to wipe out US and make it uninhabitable for 100+ years. Search Cobalt bombs

[@robertmurphy4458]

@@thanikk990 I agree 👍

[@nafets6265]

much bigger actually.

[@michaelloder5150]

Back when Robert Oppenheimer developed the A Bomb to what happened in the 40s to the tech of the power of the weapons we have today is unimaginable. Hope that day never comes !

[@earljohnson2113]

Oh but it will. Bible Prophecies must be fulfilled. Christ and the Angels (aliens) will save our hide though.

[@Alps6408]

Nah, the weapons today aren't as powerful as those from the 50's and 60's but still devastating.

[@earljohnson2113]

@@Alps6408 I beg to differ.

[@rogerdildeau7507]

Forget Russian. Let's see you hit Tel Aviv. REMEMBER THE USS LIBERTY!

[@totalplonker824]

God bless the USA for making the world a safer place! Love from a UK citizen.

[@scottaubrey9046]

The UK have 4 of there own subs with trident missiles armed with nukes giving nato 18 in total. Powerful stuff

[@FFNeptune]

Forgot about the nukes bro say smthng to russia now boy

[@scottaubrey9046]

@@FFNeptune what do you expect me to say to the Russians or more to the point the Russian milary. They have embarrassed themselves enough so I will abstain

[@FFNeptune]

@@scottaubrey9046 ye conquering Ukraine is embarrassing nice and Biden going Iranian instead of Ukrainian

[@scottaubrey9046]

@@FFNeptune but my Russian friend Russia is not conquering Ukraine, it has just had it's arse handed to itself in the North and is struggling to hell in the south and that's without mentioning it's flagship has been sunk. That victory parade in May is going to one hell of a job to pull off that's for sure

[@FFNeptune]

@@scottaubrey9046 flagship sunk n everything still ? Wht u gonna do the fight is on and russia is winning and ye russia is using a very less amount of military power in Ukraine and we r also selling oil to our allies like India so don't worry ukraine gonna go down and u guys provoked russia to do it

[@jperez-vv2nb]

Can't still under estimate the enemy we have to assume that they can have big military capability, ,it still could be ugly a third world War

[@chrisluttrell2859]

💯💯💯💯

[@billhanna8838]

No One wins that sir is why we have them - No one wants to kill there family Oh except evil ones , Ones who dont have a soul & It aint Russia, USA = AIPAC .

[@johnhopkins6260]

"Mach 24": guess that qualifies as a hyper-sonic missile, eh?

[@abcmedia2297]

Putin has warned the EU of using nuke missiles , now it is the US turn. go ahead and make history.

[@johnhanson9245]

These are really inexpensive submarines. At 6:58, the video reports that they cost "4 dollars minus $6 billion to manufacture". That is one cheap nuclear powered submarine. I will pay $4 dollars for one please.

[@bobloblaw1965]

They deliver your sub and owe you $5,999,999,996.00 USD. That's a great deal!

[@albshkup]

I m glad that Albania 🇦🇱 is on USA 🇺🇸 side 🇺🇸❤️🇦🇱

[@henrysantos7160]

Albanian USA the best.👍. The real matatan.🤔.

[@bendike]

Yeah. That's great to know the US will use you as cannon fodder.

[@joealcamo8901]

While not taking care of our Veterans, border, starving children and seniors, homeless on our streets!

[@slowdancer5563]

Sonoma County California here. All I can say is that I'm glad that they are on our side.

[@jasongoodman3546]

23 knots underwater is fast!

[@marksprague1280]

Quiet while doing so is more to the point.