UFO/UAP Whistleblower David Grusch Clearance Reinstated with Rep. Eric Burlison

Rep. Eric Burlison joins John Michael Godier to discuss the need for oversight on potential historical and current UAP retrieval and reverse engineering programs. Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO) also proposed and passed by voice vote, an amendment to the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations bill, "to renew the security clearance of David Grusch"
KZbin Membership: / @eventhorizonshow
Podcast: anchor.fm/john-michael-godier...
Apple: apple.co/3CS7rjT
More JMG
/ johnmichaelgodier
Want to support the channel?
Patreon: / eventhorizonshow
Follow us at other places!
@JMGEventHorizon
Music:
stellardrone.bandcamp.com/
migueljohnson.bandcamp.com/
leerosevere.bandcamp.com/
aeriumambient.bandcamp.com/
FOOTAGE:
NASA
ESA/Hubble
ESO - M.Kornmesser
ESO - L.Calcada
ESO - Jose Francisco Salgado (josefrancisco.org)
NAOJ
University of Warwick
Goddard Visualization Studio
Langley Research Center
Pixabay

[@EventHorizonShow]

If this video gets 5k likes, we will make John do a live Q&A.

[@RoissyAngel]

...wearing a Star Trek uniform. Preferably not red.

[@kenmasonj4812]

I hate to say this, because we have gotten our HOPES up, so MANY times before. And we have been BURNED so many times before. I Guarantee you, that the DOD, will find a way, to BLOCK this. Just like they BLOCKED everything else !

[@alexdiggins1372]

532 likes in the first hour. Time to start thinking up some questions...

[@usnairframer]

That would certainly be a fun time. It's been a long time.

[@elduderino7767]

trump exposed the deep state to the mass in 2016 with this upcoming election the entire world can plainly see that US has gone completely rogue, US citizens have been reduced to tax slaves, the judicial and political system has completely broken down they are not longer fit for purpose, in fact quite the opposite, they are now tools of oppression

[@suzettewilliams1758]

Fair play to him; he''s sceptical on the whole NHI part but is still willing to get to the bottom of the matter. You cannot really ask more than that.

[@victorgiacobbe4453]

Why do we go to Mars by rockets then?I don't believe your bullshit.

[@yvindwestersund9720]

Absolutely right for my own personal perspective And I would also say that this is a man that has been interested in educate him selves And no burn meant but he is actually a republican sorry but it just had to be said in this environment that we live in But on the other hand he is the definitive proof that there are intelligent people anywhere And that's good for our future Just saying 🇳🇴

[@PhillyHardy]

Exactly why would anyone be expected to be responsible for our taxes,

[@franklin519]

Appreciate you reporting on this topic and not being dismissive. Whatever is happening we need to find out.

[@EventHorizonShow]

Agreed and thank you.

[@derp195]

Agreed. As other have said, whether it’s aliens or it isn’t, it’s still a huge story. The one thing we know for sure at this point is that UFOs are not nothing, and the intelligence community is very determined to keep the information to themselves.

[@JayMcKinsey]

Nothing is happening except stupidity and balloons.

[@OllamhDrab]

If we're gonna find anything out it won't be from a Republican House run by a Young Earth Creationist who doesn't believe in either science or actual history or yaknow, many of us in hearing of this actually existing as human beings. (What these MFers *do* believe in is telling elaborate stories with no facts again and again how 'the 'Deep state must be hiding things from us, cause..... Cause, cause I say so!" )

[@istvansipos9940]

we really don't. I mean, we mustn't. Not in a "whatever" way. For example, if these are secret cases of military aviation, and we find out a lot about them, so will many many bad people.

[@Joe.T888]

This is great news! David’s clearance being reinstated is crucial to Congress being able to hear all his information. Thank you for bringing this news to us viewers!

[@yannowhutitiiiizzz2778]

Don't be surprised if he turns up missing...

[@paulie2009]

@@yannowhutitiiiizzz2778 don't be surprised if his hearsay 'evidence' turns up missing. He'll almost certainly be there. It's important to him financially.

[@OllamhDrab]

What information? We didn't get any the first times?

[@swirvinbirds1971]

I mean all we got was people told him this or that. Nothing first hand.

[@ryandavis4448]

​@@swirvinbirds1971he had access to documented programs that had all the names of ppl and evidence. He couldn't reveal the name of the program or he'd be court marshaled

[@mrschuyler]

Thanks for dealing with this subject. It's refreshing to see people such as yourself researching this.

[@EventHorizonShow]

We are taking it seriously.

[@Njkk500]

I for one am glad this matter is being taken very seriously as we need to get to the bottom of it.

[@GannDolph]

Even for haters of the woo, a whistleblower claim of misappropriation of funding - at the insane magnitudes alleged here no less - requires full investigation, period. No honest American taxpayer should disagree with that...

[@eyeprops5422]

Exactly this is not the 1980s tabloid urban legends.

[@captindo]

You’re right dude. Nice seeing competent and grounded scientists taking the time to listen and go over any and all evidence on this mind blowing, zeitgeist changing information.

[@3-body-problem]

The problem I have with Eric's "Its our tech" hypothesis is that these things have been witnessed and documented (even tic-tacs") since the early part of the last century. You could argue that we are getting close to this technology now, but you can't expect these programs to be active while the entire world was also at war. To me, the "military tech" hypothesis is a coping mechanism to deal with fear and uncertainty of the phenomena and what it might represent.

[@Nocturne83]

I agree. Sure some of it might be ours, but most of it is probably not..

[@OllamhDrab]

He has no damn idea what he'd get if there was even a mailman truck to catch. Unworthy of a science show if you asked me. He related no facts. None at all.

[@keithinadhd6693]

I am inclined to agree.

[@andymccracken4046]

Yes, if it is our secret stuff why use it to annoy our military?

[@GareWorks]

I'm not so sure I agree. We know all sorts of top secret military projects happened during the major wars in the past - anything to get an advantage over the enemy. What's to say some sort of UFO wasn't part of that? I think it's extremely likely that some of these kinds of projects happened during war time, because we've seen similar things with the "high risk, high reward" mentality such as the Manhattan Project.

[@feabeslagic6051]

That is one healthy sceptic right there, that is making history. Thank you Mr. Burlison for moving this topic forward. That was a giant step!

[@BoltRM]

Thanks Rep. Eric Burlison! 💪 I understand his inability to accept the UFOs are made by NHI, yet these extremely advanced objects have been seen for centuries & regularly observed by thousands around the world since WW2. Also even IF recent US UAP events are psy-ops, that doesn't explain the other events elsewhere. Humans aren't even CLOSE to the tech & physics knowledge required. IF the US has that knowledge, we could completely dominate the planet's energy & people. I take comfort in the idea, if these entities wanted to control the Earth, they could have done so hundreds of years ago.

[@BoltRM]

Let's not forget all of the UFOs shutting down & ARMING nuclear missiles in both Russia & the US as recounted by numerous people running those facilities. 🚀

[@frankiewaters9031]

the Higgs Boson was still a theory when the Tic Tac was filmed by the Navy in 2004

[@archmage_of_the_aether]

Darn. This is a scoop. Not just a great interview, an example of the value of new independent media.

[@EventHorizonShow]

Thank you.

[@archmage_of_the_aether]

​@@EventHorizonShowthank you, sir. He tried to get political in a way, you gave it no oxygen, I was impressed.

[@faizanrana2998]

I GUCKING LOVE THIS GUY

[@falseofdoom7919]

I'm the 100th thumbs up

[@TheDavidPoole]

I have to admit, this was the one guy I thought was the least likely to have any real interest in the subject when watching the Congress hearing on UAP. I'm impressed that he got David Gruschs clearance reinstated. I just hope that it's not too late. I'm sure that if there are any current programs, those in charge would move rather fast in relocating. Also, David Grusch needs to have some very tight security allocated to protect him from any potential physical danger. Great show John.

[@foxuploader]

hear hear. Pleasantly surprised to see Mr Burlinson pushing for transparency. he might not believe but he senses the injustice of keeping secrets from the population

[@Teeveepicksures]

Politicians have nothing to do with clearances. Nor does Burlison hold one himself. In fact, Burlison isnt even on any relevant committees.

[@TheDavidPoole]

@@Teeveepicksures ok I'm not American so I don't know the ins and outs of your system (nor mine really I ought to be better informed), but you know what I mean. It's good that someone is starting the process. Is that a better way to put it?

[@TheDavidPoole]

@@foxuploader yes. On viewing that hearing again, I think what I initially read as disbelief and dismissal was more that he was shaken by what he was hearing. Disbelief in that it wasn't something he thought could ever happen could possibly be true.

[@janmartenlocher]

"I think the public should KNOW.." Thank you Rep. Burlison!!

[@JohnHirsch88]

Thanks for staying on top of the whole UAP thing. It's pretty weird that there's no cash or push for something that's got so many folks buzzing, right? I mean, if people are into it, you'd think the government might be all over it, just out of sheer curiosity, or because the public is into it. But then you see how they handle stuff overseas, or can't even get basic rights sorted out back home, and it's like, are they actually pulling off some massive cover-up, or do they just not have their act together?

[@superbwater78]

It's all part of the slow disclosure, I think they know that they cannot hide this anymore.

[@3-body-problem]

Now you are begining to understand how powerful and far reaching the coverup is. When all major media outlets are beholden to the government and it's various agencies, the truth only comes through as a trickle. Unlike previous generations, we now have the internet to ensure that the coverup can no longer be maintained. It will take time.

[@Nitidus]

Sometimes I feel like you guys think like children. "The government", "the media", "the cover-up" do not exist. This isn't like three puppets sitting around a table talking to each other, do you understand? Both "the government" and "the media" are pluralistic groups of thousands and thousands of people, all of them with their own individual interests. They are not coherent bodies that all aim at the same goals. You totally don't get how incredibly complex a modern day government as large as the US's is, and the same goes for the media - or even more so, honestly, because the media isn't artificially restricted to a certain size. First of all, it is absolutely ridiculous to propose all of them would be controlled by whomever or all of them were working together on any sort of orchestrated cover-up. I've worked in the European Parliament and I've seen the complexity of Brussels's administrative apparatus with my own eyes. It is physically impossible to keep everyone there under one umbrella, no matter how unimaginably important a subject is. And I'm sure the US government is even crazier. So every time I read comments like the one above me claiming those ridiculous things, it feels like a first grader tries to make up some imagery in their mind to simplify something enough to be able to make sense of it what is apparently too big for their little brain to understand. Like, you have zero clue about instructional politics, you have never worked in any significantly large political enviroment. You have no insights whatsoever about how things work there. Instead you make up an adventure story in your mind that sounds like how you would imagine it and then push that as reality. But back to OP's comment about why the government doesn't push for a solution now that the public is so interested in the topic. Again, it's about my first paragraph. Yes, the US do have a rather strict governmental hierarchy because they are a presidential democracy - with emphasis on presidential rather than democracy. But despite how the system is perceived publicly, even the president can't simply say, "That's how I want it", and magically things are arranged accordingly. We do not live in a Hollywood movie and the real life's stories are longer than 90 minutes. Every little thing that needs change has a cascading effect through dozens of offices in several different branches of the government which are all intertwined and have overlapping areas of responsibility, and so on. And before someone cries about the government being too big: NO. That's how it works if you want to govern as big of a country - especially in today's tragically complicated world, especially while maintaining a ginormous defense sector like the US's. You have no idea how much work this is even for the most basic things. Regarding our little UFO debate, there would be a whole bunch of different interests colliding, and all the while there's this huge sword of Damocles hanging overhead, inscribed with "national security". Especially with the alleged black money involved, you will experience pushbacks against anything you do, even if you're literally part of the government, by people with power over their branch of the administration. People in the completely overblown defense sector with A LOT of said power and A LOT of influence and budget compared to any other area. It is just so easy to derail things if you are experienced and know what you're doing. It is so easy for the system to blockade itself. Very rarely we've seen presidents put their fist to the table and get everyone in line. Only when it's about some existential problem. Therefore, the public being interested in little green men might not at all be enough for the current administration to divert as much resources from other topics as would be needed. That is assuming they care about it at all in the first place. All of this is _so much more likely_ than any sort of large scale conspiracy. Yeah, maybe there's a (comparatively) small one to protect some intelligence agency that illegaly diverted funds or some people in the MoD who are corrupt. Whatever. We all know to what lengths US Departments go to protect their intelligence agencies from facing any repercussions for illegal actions. It doesn't mean the president is in on it or anything. And I would be VERY careful about how serious I take comments on the "Deep State" from representatives of the Trump party. It's been used as a hollow propaganda claim for almost ten years now. Trump vowed to drain the "swamp" that our Rep. here is talking about while in reality being the most corrupt president in IS history. Don't believe something only because it seems to confirm your prejudice. There's no room for biases in a scientific debate.

[@BoltRM]

So far we have basically received under oath with penalties, _confirmation_ vs total disclosure

[@boneidlethe3rd]

​@@SizemoreMusicthat's a sweeping comment.

[@SuperShania81]

I wanted to express how grateful I am in you, your channels and the esteemed guests you have on that treat this topic with respect and objectivity. I’m a longtime listener and I’ve always enjoyed your essays on the topics you present. It also gives me hope to see (mostly) bipartisan action, especially at a time when congress has been the least united in recent history. I hope your efforts will be remembered in years to come and I look forward to future episodes on this subject!

[@EventHorizonShow]

Thank you!

[@wordclock707]

Well said. +1

[@ryandavis4448]

I think its important to understand that Grusch wasnt the only, nor the first person that has come forward saying these exact same things. Whistleblowers have come forward for decades, but ppl have been programmed to blow it off.

[@craigthescott5074]

Yep Bob Lazar said all of this in 1989.

[@ryandavis4448]

@@craigthescott5074 and it goes WAYYYY farther back than that. Go research the whistle blowers who had first hand altercations. Eyes On Cinema has a library that spans nearly 70years.

[@joetaska]

It seems like this has been happening for as long as I can remember. There's a bunch of hype about UFOs and nothing ever happens. It's the same story. Some whistle-blower gets hyped up and we never get anywhere past a hearing and more questions. If this information is moved to private industry Congress says the matter is out of their hands. This will die down and in a few years there will be another sensational story from another insider that claims they have proof and again nothing will happen from it. This must be the 7th or 8th time that someone came along with a spectacular claims and swears they have proof but they never bring anything to the table besides talk. I want to believe them and then I get discouraged when nothing happens.

[@boneidlethe3rd]

​@@craigthescott5074who's Bob lazaar?

[@craigpardy6204]

​@@boneidlethe3rdreally?? You have a world of fantastic KZbin videos to watch on lazar..

[@RamblinJer]

For a minute when the Pentagon admitted ufo's were real, I thought we'd finally reached the point of full disclosure, but I soon realized I best not hold my breath.

[@stockmanbooks]

The Pentagon has always admitted there are UFOs (UAPs) because that just means the object is unidentified. What the Pentagon must admit to is those objects are piloted by ETs.

[@vintagerebellionpodcast]

Right or wrong, what a time to be alive. 🥂

[@RoissyAngel]

Now is always a great time to be alive.

[@OllamhDrab]

Strictly speaking, reality and pollitics may be more than rooting for a sportsball team. Especially if you claim to value the scientific method, or, I dunno, at least 'root for it.'

[@MiloTheCat.]

I’m just hoping we get to the truth in our lifetime. They have kept such a tight lid on this for so long.

[@zonzone6635]

This is the most fascinating subject there is. If ever proven real, those who covered this subject will seem prophetic and intuitive.

[@tomking7080]

Why don’t they also subpoena the Inspector General to testify at hearings under oath? I would love to see what the person who found David’s claims as being “credible and urgent “has to say about these reverse engineering programs and everything else he knows.

[@andyoates8392]

Double Godier Thursday! This is going to be a good one. 🤓

[@disideratum]

Rep. Burlison thank you for your service and please please PLEASE keep fighting for the truth and transparency.

[@mcsmith732]

"....malevolent activity..." my rear end. If there were malevolent aliens with harm intended, as advanced their tech is, we humans would be toast. Meanwhile, most of We The People are tired of being treated like mushrooms; as in kept in the dark and fed sh*t. And yes, We The People do have the need to know. Thank you for keeping us updated. Dog only knows, we need someone to.

[@Howl-Runner]

Do cows or pigs know they're farmed for food? How would we know the depth of malevolence?

[@MultiBikerboy1]

Think cattle mutations.

[@CousinPaddy]

You crushed it! Fantastic interview!

[@UFOCompilation]

Crushed it? How so? He continued entertaining the fact it may be ours. Zero mention of UFOs being a part of human history since the beginning.

[@quantumgravity96]

This is absolutely the best channel on KZbin. You manage to cover both hard science and more speculative topics fairly. On a technical level your voice and delivery is also top notch. Please keep up the amazing work!

[@EventHorizonShow]

Wow, thank you!

[@NoflectioN]

Thank you for your time Mr. Burlison

[@Alex-ip1dn]

I really appreciate the nuance in which you handle this topic. Thank you both very much for your time and perspective.

[@EventHorizonShow]

Thanks for watching!

[@TheEccentricSquare]

Imagine seeing this segment on c-span 10-15 years ago. The needle is definitely moving

[@DrEmilSchaffhausenIII]

Three cheers to Rep. Eric Burlison and Congress! Thanks to Event Horizon for all the great work!

[@JonnoPlays]

Event Horizon understands their viewers. They have their finger on the pulse of what we want to see. This is timely and accurate and I expect nothing less from this production. Thank you for your hard work on the subject. Very few reasonable voices in this space right now and I'm glad that Event Horizon has become one of them..

[@EventHorizonShow]

Thank you for this comment. It’s an extremely polarizing and difficult subject to cover. We’re trying our best to discuss it with serious people.

[@lafaina79]

There's more than just secret human tech, these things have been around for a very long time.

[@lloydwhittle77]

Exactly. Can see trying to explain away with today's tech but same tech has been seen for generations

[@Cannabian]

My thing is if they have found craft and even beings the last people I want to represent the human race is a bunch of military brass.

[@seanhewitt603]

Who would you have represent us?, every First worlder is a crude oil addict... do you really want the aliens meeting with hydrocarbon junkies that smell like that??

[@3-body-problem]

@@seanhewitt603 Following eventual disclosure. The United Nations will take charge of representing mankind. 4.5% of the planets population should NOT be making the decisions that affect the remaining 95.5%

[@Cannabian]

@seanhewitt535 I'd rather them not think of the majority of people as a threat. If they have limited contact they may assume we're all very similar if put in the same situation as the brass, leading to some disastrous outcomes

[@wasuh464]

What an interesting time we live in. Thanks again for another video John!

[@Teeveepicksures]

There is nothing remotely "interesting" about any of this. Grusch has nothing but 5th hand stories

[@wasuh464]

Wow, sorry someone pissed in both of your cheerios. You both can be sour like you are while I'll continue to enjoy the 'interesting' content John always puts out. Take care.

[@bryanbates4285]

Thanks for the in-depth interview, John. I have three issues with Rep. Burlison, one technological, one relating to fundamental physics, and one relating to where to draw the line with disclosure. 1. Whether these crafts are the work of humans or of NHIs, they represent a leap ahead of current technologies several orders of magnitude greater than that of the Blackbird over existing technologies of its day. Nothing about the physics of the Blackbird would have come as a surprise to physicists of the day. Most of the technological pieces and processes had already been developed and in place elsewhere. That is not remotely the case here. Technological innovations are almost always already “in the air” before a massive breakthrough. The most famous example is the development of the atomic bomb. The Manhattan Project was one of those black-budget super-secretive programs, but Einstein and others had been discussing the physics of atomic weapons for decades. Exactly how to develop and deploy these was another matter, of course. 2. On to the physics implied by observing these anomalous craft which hint at the extent of the leap we’d have to make. They seem to take advantage of anti-gravitic and anti-inertial properties. Contrary to Burlison, the Higgs field is not responsible for the gravitational field. The Higgs imparts mass to elementary particles like electrons and quarks. But this is only responsible for a very small portion of the mass of objects which are instead defined by Einstein’s most famous E=mc2 equation. The vast majority of our mass, or the mass of a UAP for that matter, comes from the binding energy of the strong force that binds those quarks together into protons and neutrons. Manipulating the Higgs field does not get you anti-gravitic technologies. 3. To change how gravity affects mass is a whole other kettle of fish and would require mind-boggling energies. Therein lies the rub about disclosure. It is often said that the public has a right to know if we are sharing this Earth with NHIs. Sure. But Burlison, like many others, draws the line at sharing the technology with the public because it could be used by competitor nation-states or non-state actors to negate US strategic advantage. He would like the US to have exclusive rights to “weaponize” this technology. Whatever you think of this argument, my point is that the public has another stake in these technologies: they represent in effect a revolution in energy production and distribution that has the capacity to transform our world, free us from our greenhouse gas-producing infrastructure, and much much more besides. Given the state of the world (climate change and hostilities over oil and other resources), I think we need to push for the release of these technologies in a form we can use now.

[@gerardlynch8099]

Amazing! Thanks for posting.

[@------YeahOK------]

Well done, keep pushing!! I'll never forget my experiences and still think about them every day. Some friends and family have experienced stuff too. Something is going on. From Scotland.

[@stricknine6130]

Thank you for continuing to cover this. With all the craziness in the world it can easily become lost in the noise of current events. Thanks for the interview!

[@waxeggoil3130]

If the USA already has this sort of exotic technology then it's already in the wrong hands.

[@3-body-problem]

True... And in which case, we would be seeing them fly constantly across Russian and Chinese skies. (Hint: we're not seeing that)

[@caesarbasti19]

We're not mature enough to have it as humans. It might be a blessing in disguise even though it's probably kept secret for selfish reasons.

[@caesarbasti19]

​@@3-body-problem They're everywhere. Chances are that US, Russia and China all have their programs and no one wants to expose what they have.

[@jajupa78]

​@ascendedessence 4D is time so maybe you mean 5D? But why stop there could be 10D or 100D if what we call the universe is actually infinite...

[@gmaslittleboy6196]

Great interview! thanks for staying on top of this.

[@ell2ell]

What a great interview with Rep Eric Burlison. Thank you both for moving this subject further.

[@shaxe_]

Would love for you to interview someone like Ross Coulthart about the recent happenings of this topic but spend more time speculating with him about what it means for our future IF NHI is real and here and we aren't at the top of the food chain as we always imagined. Could be a fun and scary convo.

[@joelyons3713]

Great interview. Love the example of where’s the technology advancement in the last 70 years?

[@OllamhDrab]

Almost like human beings are more cleverer than the Christian Right thinks we are, yet not so extremely more cleverer that, umm, Higgs Boson likely exists cause w smashed protons together extremely hard after ten thousand tries with the biggest thing we ever built, so we're hiding alien fighter plane technology but don't believe science about a damn virus or like trans people or why you can't insure Florida lately! '

[@OllamhDrab]

(Yes, the simpler answer is the Putin-sympathetic chaos-caucus would like our capabilities revealed. If there was aiien contact to reveal it woould be a diplomatic matter.)

[@GrahamMyers]

Love the work of Rep Burlison. I do think Rep Burlison needs a tiny briefing on the decades of previous evidence so that he has a clearer understanding of what position to take on UFOs.

[@Teeveepicksures]

He has a Bachelor of Arts degree and an MBA. He has ZERO idea what hes talking about.

[@jaytc3218]

He needs a very large briefing. To echo the other person in this thread, Burlison has no idea what he's talking about. He might be a smart guy when it comes to budgets but on this topic, he's in over his head.

[@midnightkaty5130]

Thank you for covering this, I hadn't heard!

[@jacobystonecypher791]

THATS MY CONGRESSMAN!! LETS GOOOOO!!! Thank you John for sharing your conversation with Eric with us. I am hopeful for the future.

[@chasemcintyre6806]

Well your congressman just pretty much ruled out “non human intelligence” which is very foolish in my opinion, especially when you take into consideration the entirety of the subject and it’s historical references and also sworn testimony of trained fighter pilots and ALSO direct confirmation from a high ranking intelligence official who investigated this very claim and found it to be urgent and credible! So your congressman looked and listend to all that evidence and testimony and his first thought was “I find it hard to believe it’s an alien civilization from light years away” ……….lol. As a republican I’m actually quite offended

[@HAL-vu8ef]

It only takes one person to have a great idea that could lead to a technological revolution and thus leapfrog everyone else. That person could be anywhere in the world.

[@3-body-problem]

Once the Americans mastered atomic weaponry, how long thereafter did Russia (then the rest of the world) have the same knowledge? Weeks? Months? If the US has this tech now , EVERY nation has the same tech.

[@johnnyringo35]

That's not necessary true. Not sure if this is true but it well may be.... Gorbachev visited Reagan in the 80s. Reagan really wanted to stop the cold war (or be known as the man who stopped it) So he did something that I suspect no president could today. He took Gorbs to our skunk works facility. Showed him enough advanced tech that Gorbechev realized it was a futile effort. Shortly there after the wall came down..... Unfortunately that didn't defeat communism. It just allow it to spread... that's a different topic though. Sounds like something Reagan would do....do I believe it? I give it 75 chance it's real.

[@seasonedbeefs]

The yanks will do the same as they've done to Nicolai Tesla. They will not release anything unless they have monetized it.

[@mrtoughpants]

Thanks for all the great content you put out JMG!

[@pdxthomas]

Thank you again, for following up on news and discussions of this subject.

[@TheMikethoth]

Awesome for covering this John.

[@eyesofchild]

Amazing episode. What a great interview. Super clear communicator, and good news on the Grusch topic. Thank you!!!

[@loudnoises1112]

Very insightful discussion. Thanks

[@EventHorizonShow]

Thank you for watching.

[@sharkylpd4]

Really enjoyed this one! Great work sir!!

[@dallasbagley]

I've seen them fly over my house. They were more akin to animals than mechanical crafts. No chance those things were anything of our world

[@KennethBailey-dp8zl]

Good work today.

[@vladimird8541]

John thank you for doing this interview, please keep pushing it 🙏

[@rook2043]

Great interview 👍

[@JasonAStillman]

9:12 The Higgs field is NOT a gravitational field.

[@markbeames7852]

The Congressman's knowledge regarding the Blackbird is severely lacking. The general public knew about it long before the 1980s. It was used during the Vietnam conflict. The top speed has always been classified though.

[@cf453]

An reasonable estimate of that top speed can be made relatively easily.

[@Catkinscat]

This is amazing, what a great interview , well done event horizon you are living up to your name 😃👍

[@ryandugal]

Power to the people!

[@antoniopezzella2174]

Thank you for this, great content

[@phildyer7762]

Happy theyre finally standing up

[@donalddeorio2237]

Doesn't he realize that the capabilities of these craft have been the same for over 70 years. No body is going to keep that under wraps for that long a period of time.

[@terrybradford4305]

Can someone tell this guy this has been going on for a very very long time. How could it been us in the 1930s or earlier!

[@CryptoBlood]

Exactly!!

[@amdaniels11]

Excellent video update.

[@warrenhooper1218]

Great report!

[@robzajac5400]

THANK YOU. I learned more about what the heck is going on in this half hour interview than anything ive seen/heard in long time! Helps us "get the scoop" lol.

[@OllamhDrab]

Did you. Please recap the facts related. Perhaps I missed the facts.

[@rodylermglez]

Malevolent activity? Wait a second. Is he referring to the instances where UAP has disabled military equipment like nuke controls, radio, radar and such? Because that might be accidental interference. Whatever those phenomena are, there was no follow up "attack".

[@MrJohnnyLighting]

That we know of.

[@balazsvarga1823]

Abduction of citizens would be a malicious intent I bet.

[@wmanadeau7860]

Grusch's testimony included a yes response to the question have people been injured or killed in encounters.

[@rodylermglez]

Still, that doesn't immediately imply aggression. People could get killed from exposure to unknown tech just like how a bird would die from being exposed to the turbine of a plane. That's what Grusch is probably pointing to. If they were aggressive, I think we would know by now. The only scenario I can imagine any hostile interloper wouldn't have a large impact in the safety of the planet would be if their numbers and the resources they manage aren't enough to take us down, so it makes little sense to try an "invasion". I suspect rather that the "malevolent" activity is deactivation of military equipment (accidental or intentional) because the military are WAY too sensible to having their "key strategic" assets disabled or rendered innefective. Those snafus really spooks them.

[@marcuscole1994]

They are abducting us wake up

[@tonyjennison3199]

I hope this goes viral. Got to stand up and give a round of applause to this senator.

[@iam9697]

Commenting for the algorithm.. please keep it up, John! You're about the only source out there that looks at this phenomenon with an open mind.

[@3-body-problem]

Although this passing doesnt guaruntee automatic reinstatment of Grusch's clearances. It IS a legitimate means of strengthening that process.

[@johnhayden8666]

The Amendment was pretty toothless if you ask me.

[@Njkk500]

I recently today watchted the interview with Tim Birchett from congress as a guest on a podcast today, More oversight is what's needed. And more skiffs are needed to get to the bottom of this on whether or not this is highly advanced classified human propulsion technology or beings/AI of off-world origin. If he's reinstated this is good news.

[@Pbav8tor]

The UAP hearings were the first time I've seen excellent bi-partisan work in more than a decade. This seems to be one subject where republicans and democrats are in full accord, and I wish republicans were more like this in other hearings. The amount of money, lack of oversight, and overt contempt of congress by agencies and defense industry players is infuriating and dangerously illegal. I hope the committee keeps digging out the infection.

[@Pbav8tor]

Respect to Mr Burchett for how he handled the hearing and Mr. Burlison for the continuing effort. Thank you gentlemen.

[@MCsCreations]

​@@Pbav8torImagine if politicians could get behind other issues like that... The world would be a much better place. (And I'm not even from the US, I'm from Brazil... But this problem is everywhere.)

[@Leopardvixen369]

SCIF - Sensitive compartmented information facility.

[@LairdJ56]

Brilliant, keep going

[@fangio7677]

Awesome, keep on digging.

[@Arkantos117]

People get too hung up on the idea that UAPs must be manmade because there's no known way to easily cross the vast distances of space but were that the case that would only mean that aliens didn't create the craft. It doesn't actually rule out another earth species of some sort making the craft at some point in history.

[@BSpinoza210]

My biggest hangup with all this is that it would take mindblowing amounts of energy to manipulate the Higgs field directly, using our current, public understanding of physics. If this has changed, then we're looking at things as far out as warp drives suddenly being within the realm of plausibility.

[@reclusiarchgrimaldus1269]

Have you read the Salvatore Pais navy patents?

[@EinsteinsHair]

@@reclusiarchgrimaldus1269 Why would they publish advanced patents of things that actually work? Are you sure they aren't thinking, " We wasted money researching this. Let's publish it so all of our competitors will each waste the same amount of money. Hopefully more, because they will think we made it work, so they should try again."

[@cdurkinz]

This was great John thanks.

[@user-qh4pk6ie6k]

What an awesome interview

[@RussTrotter]

A quick google shows that the Higgs boson is not directly responsible for gravity, am I missing something?

[@oatlord]

Maybe you could indirectly infer that the Higgs is responsible for gravity, but yeah, I think he got that wrong.

[@EddyA1337]

It's responsible for giving things mass, which is energy, which warps spacetime to create gravity, but if gravity has an associated boson, it isn't the higgs (the higgs boson is a scalar boson as opposed to a gauge boson eg photon, gluon)

[@jedidiahhenry6020]

Yeah, I feel like most politicians he is talking out his ass!

[@i2308Matt]

The higs was created in the LHC for one millisecond so you can really prove it exists

[@3-body-problem]

He's trying to shoe-horn his limited understanding of physics in and reconcile this phenomena with textbook knowledge. It's a coping mechanism. He's off the target by a mile but at least his mind is open and he's thinking about it logically. Its commendable.

[@AURORAREVEALNOW]

November 16th is where we will see the UFO/UAP crash retrieval and reverse engineering program from the second SCIF meeting with Tim Burchett and the US lawmakers. They must reveal the program to the public after the meeting. We need to see the program and it's advanced technological capabilities.

[@WAVEFUNCTION_TV]

Great reporting John. 🫡

[@trishadearing1174]

Wow!! But I know not to get my hopes up. Hoping to see more proof!

[@floccinaucinihilipilifications]

I’m most impressed that this amendment comes from Rep.Burlison who is the most skeptical

[@MCsCreations]

You know what, John... It would be fascinating to hear Eric Weinstein reacting to some of these ideas, like the manipulation of the Higgs field... Really interesting conversation indeed! Thanks a bunch for the interview! 😊 Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊

[@Extremist-MAGA-gamer]

Excellent interview.

[@docwhiskey996]

The representative needs to remember that the Nimitz video is 19 years old this month. The behavior and ability reported by the pilots, and recorded on radar from the 2 seperate encounters that day, is before the discoveries he mentions.

[@LennySkinz]

I thoroughly enjoy your content John, thanks alot for all the brain and imagination food.

[@MikkeyFacts]

My takeaway is that Burlison seems like an honest man who just want the truth, and it bodes well that he is for the truth to be shared with the people. Im glad you gave him a platform to talk because he deserves more credit for his efforts 👏

[@Teeveepicksures]

Burlison is an opportunist. This is all self-promotion.

[@danbeard1168]

interesting chat. please keep talking to these people on the inside of the mechanism of Govt , regardless of their position on the subject . I would love to hear from Rep. Gillarbrand .

[@kenmolloy1645]

Good interview 👍

[@TheHighlanderprime]

SR-71 Blackbird was a propulsion based plane with obvious human design logic. The things we’re talking about don’t abide by our known physics no matter how advanced they might be. So I think Eric doesn’t really understand how magical these objects have been; and if they go back to at least mid-20th century, they’re not us.

[@rossmcleod7983]

Love yer work you magnificent highlander.

[@waxeggoil3130]

You're correct. The blackbird example is a misdirection from the actual data that indicates something far more exotic .

[@superbwater78]

I agree. I think he is in for a rude awakening. But, I am glad that he is digging into this.

[@Pbav8tor]

I've seen them. No way human. In addition, our ancestors Knew these beings. They scratched, painted, sculpted in stone and told us about these beings. They have been with us a very long time. Over 80 years of agressive disinformation has damaged our ability to trust our own senses.

[@FFNOJG]

There was one that destroyed a guy's windmill in the late 1800s... like 1875 or 1895 somewhere between those dates down in Texas. there is a newspaper article about a farmer seeing a flying machine that crashed into his windmill, and destroyed it. we didn't have flying machines back then....

[@jamespike5161]

While I remain fervently interested in all of this, I still say “habeas corpus” as it were.

[@jacobp249]

I really hope that sometime Grusch comes on to have an interview with you, that'd be a fascinating conversation

[@EventHorizonShow]

We’ve tried and are trying.

[@markheys9393]

Keep pushing

[@kladewilson598]

Man I’ve always been for term limits but I never saw it from an angle that it would prevent those in power from informing politicians.

[@cf453]

My issue with term limits is that they arbitrarily throw out the good with the bad. Good, experienced politicians exist, and that experience matters. I'm in favor of letting elections decide how long people stay in office, and finding ways to encourage new and better talent to jump in the ring. Ranked Choice voting would be a great start, and it's an entirely non-partisan solution.

[@markbeames7852]

I would like to know what Gen. Clapper was doing at that last Oversight Subcommittee hearing sitting in the first row behind the witnesses.

[@TheDavidPoole]

Isn't he his lawyer?

[@markbeames7852]

Google is your friend @@TheDavidPoole

[@brachio1000]

8:18 -- "We" knew about the SR-71 by 1966 at the latest. I had the Revell model.

[@graffist448]

So there's a chance we've had this tech for over 70 years? Makes no sense. How could it be us..

[@mrx1278]

If the claims are not true as some agencies would like me to believe, why should this be classified at all? Why would any government agency classify something that doesnt exist? Seriously, are rainbow unicorns classified as well? What about "bigfoot", what level of classification does it require? Does anyone get my point, or is that concept classified as well?

[@Feralsquirrel]

They've already confirmed that they have no idea what some of the UAP videos are, that doesn't necessarily mean the whistle blower is telling the truth.

[@rustymustard7798]

Because the more unnecessary things they classify, the more attention and investigative resources are wasted pursuing false leads and arguing about conspiracies VS focusing attention n the ACTUAL classified stuff. Most of it i bluffing to create a haystack to hide the actual classified stuff in. And even if you DID find the needle, nobody will believe it's not just more of the government making hay over nothing.

[@mw9297]

Bc they say it’s dangerous information. Has the capability to collapse society.

[@mrx1278]

@Feralsquirrel so why classify whatever they think the information is, or isn't??? Are they afraid of something? Do they feel everyone will actually see how lost they really about the subject? How is it a matter of national security if nothing actually exists? It just doesn't follow a logic line, in my opinion.

[@yannowhutitiiiizzz2778]

​@mrx1278 classified is just a term. Honestly we classify too much. Non secret stuff that doesn't need to be "classified" is done to the tune of millions of materials per month

[@mikesilverthorn911]

We are way past the question of "are UFO's real." The only question left is who is flying them.

[@oatlord]

The water is indeed warm, but not because it's safe....

[@MrBoDiggety]

Awesome!