Thank you so much for reviewing this subject of analysis, I was really struggling with these definitions!
@dylank61913 жыл бұрын
The best thing about uniform continuity is that it's for free for every continuous function defined on a compact space. So, as a little fun fact, f(x) = x^2 is uniformly continuous on every intervall [a,b] (and every other bounded and closed set for that matter)
@呂永志3 жыл бұрын
So is every polynomial, I think.
@dylank61913 жыл бұрын
@@呂永志 Yep, since every polynomial is continuous.
@arturcostasteiner97353 жыл бұрын
I think it's interesting to notice that every Lipschitz function is uniformly continuous but the converse is not true.
@tofu86763 жыл бұрын
yes i usually associate LC with UC so it would be very interesting to see such a function!
@wtt274 Жыл бұрын
Sir has given a perfect explanation on uniform continuity in his great video .Thank you sir !
@ABC-jq7ve2 жыл бұрын
I love your videos!!
@tomasasnes40812 жыл бұрын
I actually understood this!!! Awsome video
@arturcostasteiner97353 жыл бұрын
On the complex domain, there's an amazing conclusion, which doesn't seem to be very known: If f is entire and uniformly continuous on C, then f is an affine mapping: for every z, f(z) = az + b, a and b complex constants.
@bijnas00743 жыл бұрын
Love from Nepal sir .🇳🇵
@andrewmichel25253 жыл бұрын
I will take real analysis in the near future and am a bit worried about it but these videos make me feel like the class wont completely blindside me
@ranahalide9422 Жыл бұрын
Thanks sir from india ❤️
@asamenechbayissa5533 жыл бұрын
I am getting interested in analysis from those videos
@蔺美云2 жыл бұрын
Awesome!
@tomoki-v6o3 жыл бұрын
for my engineering problems i use the perpondicular to the bisector angle between left and right tangents and i trait it as a derivative
@Scrollwithvicky333 Жыл бұрын
Love from 🇮🇳 india❤
@alfredocuomo42843 жыл бұрын
Great....
@maximelamoureux98363 жыл бұрын
Your video are really helpfull. Can you make a video on several example to prove that a function isn't UC ?
@drpeyam3 жыл бұрын
Check out the playlist 😉
@DynamicMateTV3 жыл бұрын
Could you please make video explaining uniform continuity visually/diagrmatically?
@drpeyam3 жыл бұрын
Already done, check the description
@MarkusHedemann2 ай бұрын
Excellent, thank you! However, I don't see why You are constrained to add 3 to 3. Why not justadd the absolute value of -1 to 3? That will give epsilon/4 which in the end gives the same result (which, of course, is a reason why you might use 3 as well as the absolute value of -1).
@him210163 жыл бұрын
You say you’ll cover in an upcoming video how functions on compact sets are uniformly continuous but I first learnt about both those terms from a video you made ages ago! We already have this from you. Just a thought, but the definition of finite covers and compact sets was hard to understand - why is (1,6] not compact and [1,6] compact?
@drpeyam3 жыл бұрын
For (1,6] the family (1+1/n,7) is an open cover that has no finite subcover
@him210163 жыл бұрын
@@drpeyam Is the difference sir that the limit as n goes to infinity of 1+1/n can touch all the points on the open interval (1, but it could never be exactly one, so you can't call it a cover for [1 closed?
@theunknownscientist32493 жыл бұрын
Every continuous function on a compact interval is uniformly continous on that interval?! That seems soooo awesome, I can't believe it. Hmm, maybe I'll try a proof? Kinda hard tho.
@drpeyam3 жыл бұрын
There’s a proof in my playlist :)
@Apollorion3 жыл бұрын
.. say h(x, epsilon) is the value of delta for which |x-y|
@drpeyam3 жыл бұрын
I thought it would be like that too, but it’s a bit more complicated than that, unfortunately
@andikaajisaputra80933 жыл бұрын
Still support u
@pierreabbat61573 жыл бұрын
How about f(x)=cube root of x on all R?
@drpeyam3 жыл бұрын
I think it is, since the derivative is bounded. Check out the derivative video on the playlist
@pierreabbat61573 жыл бұрын
@@drpeyam No it isn't; the derivative goes to ∞ at 0. But it's still uniformly continuous.
@drpeyam3 жыл бұрын
It’s uniformly continuous on [-2,2] since it’s compact, and also UC on [-oo,-1]u[1,oo) since the derivative is bounded there, and then you just patch things up
@yoav6133 жыл бұрын
So x^2 is unif cont in any finite interval unless delta=e/inf counts😆
@drpeyam3 жыл бұрын
Yep :)
@drpeyam3 жыл бұрын
But interestingly it is not uniformly continuous on R
@yoav6133 жыл бұрын
@@drpeyam yes i agree. From your example it is easy to see why this is not uc in R because we can not choose delta= e/inf but it is intresting that we can always expand our interval more and more but still x^2 is not uc in R
@ethancheung16763 жыл бұрын
i always wonder why we dont use the scapework as the proof. because usually in these kind of epsilon-delta proof, everything is bidirectional. if it is purely about the format of the proof (prefer top to bottom), i think we can do the scapework from bottom to top, voila!
@drpeyam3 жыл бұрын
It may look like it’s bidirectional, but sometimes it isn’t, as in Example 3
@cricketshorts34023 жыл бұрын
2nd
@loucifabdessalam15223 жыл бұрын
فوليس
@colleen94933 жыл бұрын
Use the Chen Lu! Just kidding I have no idea what this is
@stevenmellemans72153 жыл бұрын
I don’t find this very clear, if my daughter or son would give this as an answer, they would loose a lot of marks on that question. Not by me but but their teacher :-) They should use stricter notation. For instance I didn’t see any .