United States v. Rahimi - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

[@dddebz]

@fedsoc would it be possible to put a date & time banner on your SCOTUScast in the future? What do we do if there are factual errors upon which an entire justification is based? Nothing, right? “because I said so” was good enough for my parents and so should be good enough for SCOTUS? Is that FedSoc recommendation? When there is a mischaracterization up to & including provably incorrect to anyone who can see how the feature works, say of the mechanics of a modification of the functioning of a moving part turning a hunting weapon into an assault weapon? If Congress restricted them through legislation, why could they not legislate an exception, if appropriate, for such modifications that do not result in hundreds of rounds fired per minute?

[@dddebz]

I would like to mention that I would 100% rather a DV person not have a firearm if I’m their next partner. Just FYI

[@dddebz]

5:31 speeding isn’t DV and it’s offensive for Chief Justice to make that comparison.