The nostalgia. I miss driving and riding in Strykers. The C7 engine turbo whistle was beautiful.
@tommytomas-fr3sh2 ай бұрын
well, you wouldn't like to drive it in Kursk...unlike in Iraq, in Kursk, you are the prey.
@Sir.OutcastАй бұрын
@@tommytomas-fr3shYou know nothing, dummy
@hardstyle81842 ай бұрын
BIG RESPECT TO ALL YOU WARRIORS.... BIG RESPECT AND THANK YOU... LOS ANGELES, CA
@ua78472 ай бұрын
❤❤❤
@davidhopkins90212 ай бұрын
Shame ukraine will soon be no more now the criminal is in charge off usa
@jonthinks62382 ай бұрын
Please quit screaming. We all can read.
@bengarcia10912 ай бұрын
I like how he keeps calling it OLD when 90% of the BMPs driving around on both sides are from the 70s and 80s haha
@deanfirnatine78142 ай бұрын
Yep, I was like what are you talking about, unlike the other APC's it is a 21st century vehicle
@goforbroke44282 ай бұрын
@@deanfirnatine7814nope, 20th century
@ForeverBun2 ай бұрын
У России много БТР сделанных после 2020
@mdjey22 ай бұрын
Military vehicles are not released like consumer products every year a new model.
@5RingАй бұрын
My thoughts exactly. Ukraine is still driving T-64s and he calls a Stryker "old".
@Stationary-Traveller2 ай бұрын
Excellent report. Thank you.
@3-2bravo492 ай бұрын
Looks different inside without the blue force trackers etc. I spent way to much of my life inside those strykers. Good vehicle, high survivability for the crew and grunts inside. Helped me survive seven different ied attacks. We didn't have to deal with drones etc.
@mariansaines50212 ай бұрын
❤🙏
@lonniemoody53182 ай бұрын
Does the gunner shoot outside with the browning or is they're a way to control it from inside the vehicle...bcuz I noticed not much protection if the gunner is outside of the vehicle..you insight is much respected
@3-2bravo492 ай бұрын
@@lonniemoody5318 there is a remote weapon system that you use to control the 50 or the mk19 from inside ofnthe vehicles. It's controlled from that digital screen you could see bolted down on the inside and a joystick like the ones in a flight simulator. I am not sure if their rws was working or not when this was filmed. There are alot of extra armor you can add to the strykers that help protect everyone that has to stick their head out of the hatches and they had none of it for whatever reason. Ours had cope cages, netting on top, all the extra armor to keep our upper bodies more protected while exposed out of the hatches. They had the most basic stripped down version but nit wasn't the oldest version. Then older ones had the bench seats in the back instead of those individual seats you saw in the video which are meant to collapse after an explosion so you don't liquify yourself on the roof. They also didn't have the double v hull, which this one does. Making encounters with mines more survivable.
@calutuu2 ай бұрын
@@lonniemoody5318 Remote control from inside the Stryker.
@sawittwo2 ай бұрын
Russians had a similar type of transporter. Their tires were made in China. They bristled and crumbled. Can’t handle weight for too long.
@donbosco32632 ай бұрын
Strikers forward! Loved driving that beast back in 02-06.
@mariansaines50212 ай бұрын
👊🏽💪🏾
@AureoleWebweaver2 ай бұрын
ukraine cant even help itself
@ghostmournАй бұрын
This vehicle and The Bradley have significantly gained reputation in this war.
@themoodyteam2 ай бұрын
In 2024 Ukrainian soldiers, in American machines, fighting NORTH KOREANS, in Russia. Crazy 😜
@FaronPL2 ай бұрын
isn't that world war yet?
@mariansaines50212 ай бұрын
@@FaronPLinstigated by Stinky Putin😏
@johnweak67882 ай бұрын
@@FaronPLlooks like beginning of ww2, but it's Ukraine now instead of Poland
@hustensaftvernichter37852 ай бұрын
@@FaronPL World wars are usually defined by their multi-continental theatres, not by multi-continental opponents. But yes, there were more world wars than the two we officially refer to as such -however, the scale was not nearly as huge.
@FaronPL2 ай бұрын
@@johnweak6788 looks like each time we going more East, at least some progress :)
@heberje2 ай бұрын
God Bless Ukraine Благослови Боже Україну Blahoslovy Bozhe Ukrayinu
Bro's calling a stryker old/oldschool wtaf. When they came out I just got out and I WISHED we had something that high tech!
@bigdada0182 ай бұрын
Blessings, peace and luck from California to Ukraine. 🙏🙏☮🍀💛💙 (1)
@maxotbekessov591927 күн бұрын
Slava Ukraine!!!
@factanonverba61692 ай бұрын
The Ukrainian soldiers always have a smile, bloody amazing.
@larsrons79372 ай бұрын
The Ukrainians are always so full of... inspiration. 💙💛
@Sajuuk2 ай бұрын
IFV is a term given to an armored vehicle that carries troops and has an autocannon or turret with large gun or anti-tank missiles for engaging and destroying other armoured vehicles. This Stryker has none of those so the term Armoured Personnel Carrier (APC) is more appropriate.
@Julian-zj2qy2 ай бұрын
Good point. The Browning 50cal is not a 'cannon'. He does call it an APC in the video though.
@SimonTmte2 ай бұрын
@@Julian-zj2qy 0:38 "Ukraine recieved only 1 kind, this one, it's an infantry fighting vehicle"..To my understanding it's just a result of old equipment and the use of these terms have changed, similarly to how displacement equal to what was a destroyer is now referred to as a frigate or even a corvette
@Julian-zj2qy2 ай бұрын
@@SimonTmte 3:50 "So this is the inside of the Stryker APC". So he uses both terms. You're right. Confusing. Not that it matters I suppose. The old FV432s had 7.62mm in a turret and that was an (infantry) Fighting Vehicle. But we called them APCs. I'm getting a headache thinking about it..
@ФіліпМальцан2 ай бұрын
@@Julian-zj2qynot so confusing. If you google the machine, it will tell you it’s an APC-IFV hybrid
@Julian-zj2qy2 ай бұрын
@@ФіліпМальцан Now I find it's an Interim Armored Vehicle! I don't care anymore.
@jamesmcalea84252 ай бұрын
Excellent report from Journalists who risk their lives to bring us the story. Thank you.
@steveharrell28712 ай бұрын
Excellent documentary! Bravo!
@жирнанарізка232 ай бұрын
Slava Ukraine благослови боже сміливих🇺🇸🇺🇦
@jimtalbott9535Ай бұрын
The announcer seems to think a 20 year old Stryker is “old”……but he should see the Russian stuff!
@ianmurphy23562 ай бұрын
Thanks for your guided tour of that Stryker ? a real eye opener Regards from UK
@PAWPERSO2 ай бұрын
American armour smoking the bears on their own land
@Rhodophon2 ай бұрын
Smoking in pieces by now.
@Julian-zj2qy2 ай бұрын
👍
@miteshghadi31462 ай бұрын
Who is Smoking what that will tell you Frontline where Russia is advancing
@RhapsodicLoon2 ай бұрын
At what cost
@RhapsodicLoon2 ай бұрын
Gotta ring North korea for fodder. Who are now gorging themselves off pornography as they get access the internet for the first time
@davidbell70942 ай бұрын
Maybe old,but what a great bit of kit,the Stryker is! And a Browning Machine Gun,is awesome!
@bunnyfufu99332 ай бұрын
Love these walk throughs and the interviews on frontline troops 💙🇺🇦🇺🇸💙
@nitroxide172 ай бұрын
Must be terrifying… driving around in a metal box… not knowing what can hit you next. War sucks.
@wcangel2 ай бұрын
Scary? Of course. But MUCH better than walking into enemy fire. Plus these vehicles carry stuff to and from the battlefield at speed. That was the point of the video. That is what these guys said.
@kynaxicrowd70662 ай бұрын
yeah and + you know there is a shit ton of things who can explode your metal box,and even if you survive that,get in out of that metal box is a death penalty,damn boomer don't know the luck they got to not be send in first class vip with death
@atmosrepair2 ай бұрын
Yeah with all these consumer drones conductubg recon, seems pretty diffucult to maintain element of surprise and limits the numbers of infantry per squad
@Pietro79æ2 ай бұрын
Stryker 💪🫡
@markdonaldyc50132 ай бұрын
Excellent report
@wcangel2 ай бұрын
This is an extremely functional battle taxi. Send another hundred working Strykers to Ukraine, and add two hundred working humvees. Infantry support and mobility are of highest importance for the dynamic combat zones. A Stryker can carry substantial and large ammo and other supplies to the front line.
@SuperMoscowcity2 ай бұрын
you need to be sent there
@benkendall74892 ай бұрын
@@SuperMoscowcitylol spot the butthurt russian
@wcangel2 ай бұрын
@@DiscipulaIncognitus You make no sense and you have no argument. You are only shooting blanks, so you are irrelevant. SMH. Thanks for playing.
@DiscipulaIncognitus2 ай бұрын
@@wcangel Hahahaha.why are you serving Ukraine with your flapping lips when they need your hands and feet? Clown. Stay safe.
@bevo11202 ай бұрын
Let Europe send that stuff.
@fjuraa2 ай бұрын
old? 20 years is "new" on that battlefield
@art40182 ай бұрын
yep, that was weird comment. But I think journalist tried to make point that even not newest US equipment is great and can server very well. The soldier admitted they lost 0 defenders in their Striker
@LiamCochrane-ph2kx2 ай бұрын
@@art4018 because the stryker hasnt been hit yet. Not much survivability there if hit by a lancet
@hiei50402 ай бұрын
THESE ARE DESIGNED + MADE IN CANADA - You're Welcome . General Dynamics - Canada Division
@ianwilson42862 ай бұрын
For info the Striker is made in Ontario, Canada
@esmerlinfernandez78562 ай бұрын
Quick correction Stryker is a APC
@FredoTheMan12 ай бұрын
Dude - They are using tanks from the 60s and 70s. This is probably some of the newest kit they have.
@aweaustraliawrestlingenter65932 ай бұрын
What a load of bollocks
@FredoTheMan12 ай бұрын
@ You do know when Challenger 2 came into service, right mate? You think the UK sent their latest and greatest? Do you think anyone has other than himars and a few drone models they want to test? With very few exceptions most of the gear sent to them is decades old. The first of these vehicles was fielded in 2002. Tell me what other piece of armor in the field in Ukraine first saw service after 2002. Right. Right.
@aweaustraliawrestlingenter65932 ай бұрын
@FredoTheMan1 they did get some challenger a2s so what the hell do you know.
@FredoTheMan12 ай бұрын
@ And they entered service in what year?
@darrencorrigan85052 ай бұрын
Thanks, UNITED 24.
@kemperdurand78012 ай бұрын
I thoroughly enjoyed this report! Well done, and all the best to your correspondent and the crew. 💙💛
@mariansaines50212 ай бұрын
❤👊🏽💪🏾🙏
@Phenixrising-p1pАй бұрын
A good friend of mine was one of the first Stryker drives in testing and when they went into service way back over 20 years ago. Based at the time at Fort Lewis, now called JBLM, he was in the triple nickel. 555th. Glad to see they are still being used.
@DominikGentener2 ай бұрын
The Stryker is really a great infantry fighting vehicle.
@adriftfoolish12 ай бұрын
At least that's what the manufacturer would say. The soldiers call it the kevlar coffin.
@Mariamagd2 ай бұрын
Thank you 🙏 dear kozakiv and sokoly 🦅 Please stay safe 🙏 Heroyam Slava 🇺🇦✊Best regards from Maria 🇸🇪🤝🇺🇦🤗
@danalden1112Ай бұрын
A friend of mine was driving a Stryker in Baghdad when it hit an IED and was thrown 50m and rendered inoperable. He broke his ankle when it landed, everyone survived. He believed that with any other vehicle they would have been playing Boots and Saddles for him in formation. Good machine for a good cause. Slava
@ryanwalters61842 ай бұрын
Ukraine has a the full support of South Carolina!!!! ❤❤❤
@davidhopkins90212 ай бұрын
Not for much longer
@theploegАй бұрын
South Carolina is irrelevant on the world stage.
@woodyosmon71132 ай бұрын
What is wrong with the remote weapon station?
@TheBudkai2 ай бұрын
Michelin tires in Russia!
@hovanti2 ай бұрын
Odd thing is, here in Pennsylvania, my Jeep has Nokian tires made before sanctions....Finland brand, made in ruzzia. Oops!
@jacksonteller13372 ай бұрын
The M-1126 isn't that old they started the program in the late 90's if I'm not mistaken. It was developed for duties where the M-2 was overkill. So this APC is about 50 years younger than the M-113.
@Sugarmountaincondo2 ай бұрын
The main takeaway in this video that everyone should recognize is that even with 20+ year old Stryker's or even older M-113's, they are still far more superior and reliable than anything the Russians are fielding on the Zero Line. If anyone doubts this, just go to inspect the designs of the Stryker compared to its Russian equivalent, the BTR and then tally up the total amounts of video's you have watched of BTR''s being plugged on the battle front compared to any older Western supplied equipment. And if you click the knob 1-notch up and start talking about real IFV's like the M-2 or CRV or Marder's, then the Russians don't even have a class of vehicles to match them all. ❤💯💙💛
@hayleyxyz2 ай бұрын
Russia has been surviving on the inertia of their Soviet stockpiles. Aging population, brain drain and political remodelling and unpunished corruption of the Russian military has really limited anything outside of slapping a few gadgets on a T72 and calling it a new model. Ukraine had the same issues, but they woke up after 2014.
@igosannuffin75652 ай бұрын
@@hayleyxyz So why are they retreating and getting pound by the day
@uniformmike052 ай бұрын
@@igosannuffin7565 Trading land for losses. The Russians lose about a battalion’s worth of men every day to capture a field or a pile of rubble, not to mention armored vehicles that are harder to replace. That’s not sustainable in the long run, especially as their economy is slowly collapsing. Why do you think they have to rely on ammunition from Iran and North Korea and now North Korean soldiers? Russia is losing no matter how you look at it.
@dimitrygrishin45972 ай бұрын
@@uniformmike05 You can continue comfort yourself
@miteshghadi31462 ай бұрын
@@uniformmike05What do you think Ukraine is winning.
@str8tatted8512 ай бұрын
The Stryker vehicles derived from the Canadian LAV III. Stryker vehicles are produced by General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada (GDLS-C) from 2002 - present. Your welcome from Canada 🇨🇦 eh
@deanfirnatine78142 ай бұрын
and thats a copy of the Swiss made Morag Pirahna III
@theploegАй бұрын
@@deanfirnatine7814not really. The first gen 1979/80’s were. Been American owned and controlled in various forms for decades now, currently General Dynamics. R&D is world wide. Made both in Switzerland and Canada in different forms depending on client states needs.
@alexkirov7526Ай бұрын
03:20Sorry people, but the 7.62*39 is for the AK47 ... and the AMD ammo is the 5.56 for the AK74
@scottcraft63142 ай бұрын
Many if not most were made in Canada
@ConflictZoneFocus2 ай бұрын
Meeting with the vehicle operations team shows interest in their practical experience
@taoyungki7899Ай бұрын
Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦💪🇺🇦
@Delgwah2 ай бұрын
Thank you, Strength and Love.
@tanner6492 ай бұрын
Is that m2 machine are remote control or no?
@stealth42bladeАй бұрын
I don't know about anyone else but the Stryker looks way sexier than any of the BTRs
@thomasjones80792 ай бұрын
Heroyam Slava! Slava Ukraine!!
@theimmortal471819 күн бұрын
That "old machine" is newer than 90% of the vehicles in the war Guarantee that Stryker isn't older than 20 years
@oneaboveall18952 ай бұрын
i served 7 years in the army and my first job was a Stryker driver it had AC but ours was broken during my deployment lol
@schawk87092 ай бұрын
The M2 is bad ass!
@jhonbrixbrion80302 ай бұрын
So what year and model was this Stryker Built? Guys?
@JRC15887 күн бұрын
Must have not done any research because even tho it was short this vehicle helped win the battle of Falluja.. might of not been the entire war but it definitely helped get the job done .! I’m glad to see our equipment doing what it’s meant to do and bring peace.! God bless the world and god bless America 🇺🇸 Amen 🙏.!
@josedonizetidores50912 ай бұрын
Slava ukraine hero slava 🇺🇦🤝🇪🇺
@JesusOrozco-ys3fu2 ай бұрын
Viva Ucrania ❤❤❤❤❤
@zonaonce4 күн бұрын
I think it is an IFV if it has a 20mm or more as main armament, in this case the Stryker is an APC.
@butchbinion15602 ай бұрын
Thanks. ✌🏻👊🏼
@saintac31Northernsoul2 ай бұрын
Styker is a modern version of the stalwart very similar in concept .
@Primaate2 ай бұрын
Arma3 KotH RHS runs TOW Strykers, basically a 20ton 8x8 motocrosser that hunts tanks 😊
@eriqwezzel31472 ай бұрын
OOOLD ?? I’m guessing they didn’t check the dates on the M1 Abrams or the M2 .50 cal 🤷🏼
@samghost132 ай бұрын
What did i hear? Now the Striker is in a real War? So you say that Iraq was not a real war or what?! Or is it the language barrier?
@inspectortragic2 ай бұрын
More or less, it's a trial without accompanied air support
@art40182 ай бұрын
Hi didn't say that it wasn't real war. He said that Striker was first deployed to battle insurgents. So basically it wasn't participated in active combat against regular Iraq forces as I understand. And that's what you can find on Wikipedia.
@Orcawhale1Ай бұрын
The title is wrong, it's a APC not IFV.
@ThanasisMaragoudakis2 ай бұрын
Σλαβα ουκρανια❤❤❤❤❤❤
@abqcrutch19 күн бұрын
The Strykers are around 25 years old.
@brysonkuervers2570Ай бұрын
A beautiful machine! Canadian designed and made 🇨🇦🇺🇸🇺🇦 Battle tested and proven the Stryker is a great versatile vehicle. Hopefully the Ukrainians can get the other variants too!
@SmedleyDouwright2 ай бұрын
The Canadians put the same canon as on the Bradley on some of their Strykers. They don't call it a Stryker, but it is very similar.
@davamorley94812 ай бұрын
The oldest Stykers were built in the early 2000s and into the decade afterwards.
@interislandtv97212 ай бұрын
Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦 💪👍👌🇺🇸🇵🇭
@Canthus13Ай бұрын
Strykers aren't that old. 22 years at most, I think? It showed up right after we went into Afghanistan and right before Iraq. Now the M113s we sent are old. Like some of the hulls have been around since vietnam.
@tammieandrzejczuk2573Ай бұрын
Keep saying strikers are old, but they are pretty new
@michaelwarlow4398Ай бұрын
Excellent video thanks!
@seesafar99122 ай бұрын
Thanks for the run-down, man.
@deanfirnatine78142 ай бұрын
Its a excellent APC, billion times better than old M113
@Pirate92822 күн бұрын
Wouldn't that make it an APC rather than an IFV? Typically IFV's will have something like a 25mm cannon on top I thought.
@mariansaines50212 ай бұрын
Keep safe courageous people💪🏾👊🏽🙏❤️
@GardenLives2 ай бұрын
Pretty exposed up there shame they don't get remote brownings operated from within the cab
@uniformmike052 ай бұрын
It has the remote weapons station.
@hntr_242 ай бұрын
That M2 is definitely mounted on a RWS. You can operate from the top if the RWS is INOP. Otherwise the screen you saw in the gunner station operates the weapon and has a day and thermal viewer.
@WhoThisMonkey2 ай бұрын
KM? What's that in miles?
@Jimmychunguss2 ай бұрын
@@WhoThisMonkey uneducated much?
@mikeb35392 ай бұрын
Aboot 70 mph give or take lol.
@TuPacQuiao2 ай бұрын
HOLD ON BOYS THE WAR IS ALMOST OVER
@hawklord1002 ай бұрын
Slava Ukraini 💙💛
@chandee79392 ай бұрын
Молодий репортер. Каски також є ознакою поваги до воїнів. Накрийте його.
@franciscodiaz75572 ай бұрын
Héroes de Ucrania
@Nitestalker652 ай бұрын
That Stryker will not u let u down no matter how old it is!!!!! It's really not that old!!!!
@richwalter310729 күн бұрын
The year the vehiclecwas made is the last 2 digits of the serial number on the right front corner.
@artfulldodger332 ай бұрын
A good Old Battle Taxi gives you a ride free of charge to where you're CO wants you
@averagejoe79872 ай бұрын
More reports with Philip.
@patricksaintjean_2 ай бұрын
I know for a fact that can destroy a BTR
@Chloee-45Ай бұрын
Old or not do I trust this machine prob w my life and Ukrainians love it 🇺🇸
@worldofdoom9952 ай бұрын
When did we start sending Strykers?
@EK-hd7fr2 ай бұрын
Sad that these guys don't get the best and the latest from their Western partners.
@KOKONAGAMI2 ай бұрын
Is it united24 video im watching or this airwax video anyway best war machine for bravest soldiers,,,whar more can i say SALUTE
@NangNangEE2 ай бұрын
8:30 흑 (ಥ﹏ಥ)
@wilburnprice98862 ай бұрын
Filled a gap in my knowledge of war systems.
@hiddenman992 ай бұрын
Thanks to the US TAXPAYERS
@waheex2 ай бұрын
2002 isn't that old compared to the Russian junk
@florys1210Ай бұрын
You are all brave people. I wish you good health and to be safe. I hope the west will help more and wake up from their dream. Because without involving things will not get better. Thanks for the English version. Slava Ukraine.
@rachidsabil38732 ай бұрын
lol so how it’s going around the old hq of kurakhove?