Unity vs Unreal : Graphics Comparison (HDRP DEMO)

[@BessyAnoopvfx]

Unreal and Unity both have "Un" and if we remove it, they become "real" and "Ity", and you mix them together it turns into "Reality"

[@UGuruz]

Wow... great explanation !

[@budda759]

oh my god

[@wassilchoujaa3478]

@Bessy Anoop So what you implying is, if we combine the two engine together, we get an engine that can render reality ?

[@smugram5937]

Stolen

[@PhantomX768]

@@wassilchoujaa3478 Honestly It's funny because before I read this comment I was thinking that they should mix the two. Unreal had better lighting and Unity better textures and reflections. Maybe Bessy cracked the code and exploited their secret, who knows

[@grunerd]

One thing that I always miss in videos like these: Hardware Specifications and FPS stats - especially in unpredictable situations. It's one thing to make both things beautiful. But to make both things beautiful and performant, therein lies the rob.

[@prixo3806]

unity is more faster

[@YoloMonstaaa]

@@prixo3806 Source?

[@haniffaris8917]

@@prixo3806 highly debatable, especially when almost Unity games I've encountered are low on visual, and low on performance.

[@AuroraNemoia]

@@haniffaris8917 yeah, cause indie devs are making games, not learning optimization. if it runs on their box. its probably good enough. why bake lighting? why atlas your world? why use separate threads for cpu-heavy tasks that you're currently running on the main update function? those would make your game run faster. thats illegal!!!!

[@Lefinno]

@@AuroraNemoia I'd say it's more compromise than ignorance. They do take time and resources to implement, and i think it's an opportunity cost that indie developers are willing to pay to implement more on gameplay and other aspects of the game that they are more passionate about.

[@wubblyboofus8570]

im over here trying to compare the two versions and this transition just resets everything my brain just tried to see

[@phobosdeimos9799]

it's not a good comparison, cos he doesn't use same effects.

[@pissfiss]

exactly

[@Agamashi]

Yeah like wtf is the material on the paintings supposed to be? Why is it reflective especially on the "Unity" version..

[@joaquinninoortega8023]

its not good comparison cos its not a comparison in the first place.

[@mad_wolf]

In easy words:- u can produce the same quality in both engines what is needed is experience and knowledge of fundamentals. The thing I see is it's not a comparison but the Capability of both engines in producing high-quality output.

[@mad_wolf]

@@Agamashi Maybe paintings are covered with glass or plastic paper, and who knows?

[@aidendawes3560]

Nice demo! The differences are mainly down to post processing and material setup

[@LC-yo3bj]

If you get a chance can you elaborate on both a little

[@aidendawes3560]

@@LC-yo3bj unreal and unity use different post processing by default and therefore tweaking either one could bring it closer to the other. The normal maps, gloss, roughness and metallic maps can be tweaked in the materials to create a similar look.

[@oozly9291]

@@aidendawes3560 overall unreal is better. Unity is able to hold its own with interiors but you start to see the difference when there are exterior shots as the lighting is as good with others things in addition to that

[@NeilAngeloLightman]

As a cinematographer, both look really great! Unreal Engine looks like it was shot without diffusion filters while Unity looks like it was used with Haze machine and vintage glasses.

[@UGuruz]

Thanks for your feedback.

[@DreadKyller]

It felt like the Unity demo was missing some bloom and stronger depth of field that was present in the Unreal scene, as such the Unreal scene has some additional sense of realistic interactions with the lighting. I feel the demo should have had some additional effects on the post-processing stack, as Unreal has these effects enabled by default while on Unity you have to enable them manually. This would have made the two a bit closer, that being said, I liked the light coming through the windows on Unity far better than the overly harsh light coming through on Unreal. I agree with others that using volumetric lighting on Unity and no volume on Unreal also made them dissimilar. For a proper comparison of quality they should be trying to be as close to each other as possible, unless you're comparing specific features in which case then you compare the best quality you can get from each.

[@UGuruz]

Thanks for such a detailed feedback.

[@TreyCoursey]

All the talk about UE richer and better looking, Unity is washed out etc. We'll if UE had had Volumetric lighting on, it too would be washed out in places. Anytime the light comes spilling in it's going through a volume and giving everything a bit of a washed out look. For me Unity kills UE in every way. Volumetric lighting...no flickering (tons on UE) better reflections (at least setup sharper, maybe UE couldn't get there...or Unity needed a bit more blur to get the same look. As for what the artist wanted...I think the real question is which did they start with? because the other was then TWEAKED to look as close to that... Thanks so much for the effor tin making this. Glad to see Unity coming up in the ranks. Both have had great stuff, UE for a longer time...but Unity is what we develop in for Mobile and VR so it's great to see the HDRP coming along so much! Just nice to have tools like both of these accessible to artists these days!

[@UGuruz]

Yes you are right. Anybody can achieve much better look by working in more details. Unity's "Heretic and Unreal's "Rebirth" are great example of their rendering quality.

[@Shodan-0101]

Would love to see an update on this with UE5 and the latest version of HDRP! Thank you UGuruz for the amazing effort that you put into these videos!

[@DerSpielfuehrer]

"Theyre the same picture."

[@davekite5690]

Great to see an up to date comparison - For me, this vid' shows Unreal has a richer look and feel where as Unity feels a little more dull and flat. But, I'm wondering how much this is down the packages lighting and/or the scene setups...

[@BlueRockBill]

Every time I see one of these side by side comparisons it reminds me of battles between cameras. I work in the photography industry as a retoucher / 3D guy and when I see one of these side by side comparisons it reminds me of the Nikon v Cannon debate. Nikon has all sorts of real friendly great features. It's lenses play nice with each other, and they are less expensive than Cannon. Cannon is a bit less utilitarian, and each camera can be a system onto itself. But there is something magical about Cannon lenses. You can do the same composition, same subject, etc. But cannon glass does something a little better. Not that you can't make great photos in Nikon. You totally can. It reminds me of Unity vs Unreal. There's tons of great reasons to use Unity over unreal. C# is easier than C++, bugs are harder to make and easier to find. C++ is difficult enough that Unreal has a separate coding language (Blueprint) for dorks like me. There's more cool toys to play with in Unity the Unity Asset Store and Unity has post processing effects that make it nearly identical too Unreal... Nearly. Unreal just has better "glass". I don't know how they do it. Maybe they hire Cannon?

[@B.BiStudios]

1:12 What is the 25th frame in the paintings? and why did you put a quad in there to make unreal worse? burned down

[@zforward2703]

Wow very impressed, Unity looked better than UE for once. I mean i use unity all day every day, but can admit UE looks better and always has had the better graphical options. With that said, Unity HDRP is looking impressive and smokes UE here.

[@jeancarlosadrianza7416]

Wow! There are parts where I like more the result of Unreal and other where I prefer the result of Unity. The decision about what tool we must to use looks be given for what is lighter...

[@SkyIsTumbling]

i would recommend for you to fuck around with both engines and just use the one that fits you the most, they both in a lot of aspects are practically the same so personal preference and maybe what kind of quality of game you're going for is mostly the only choosing points.

[@mr.hashundredsofprivatepla3711]

I think both are fantastic. Unreal can be incredible for making very detailed and realistic scenes with ease. However what I appreciate about Unity is that with your project, you can start almost completely from scratch. You’re able to turn on or turn off lighting, shadows, reflections and post-processing whenever you like, whereas in Unreal I remember it being realistic intrinsically. With Unity you can directly control how your game looks, be it normal, photo-realistic, stylized or even retro/PS1-ish. I have nothing against Unreal though.

[@dravenhoule646]

Very true

[@rifqiasrafil802]

Can you make this video again with Unreal engine 5?. it would be greats since UE5 introduces lumen

[@kyfisher3662]

i think i like the unity more. would be keen to see them after matching the contrast and brightness

[@jadonparan4508]

Omg im in love with the global illumination of both of them lmao

[@pbilk]

I wish I could have the best of both. I prefer the reflection of the glass over the paintings in Unreal over Unity. Unity's reflections seemed to have too much contrast. However, I do like the more atmospheric and less jittery sunlight in Unity.

[@pwhite102]

They look really similar to me. The biggest difference is not getting the brightness/darkness exact between the two

[@SoaringSimulator]

Nice but Glass over canvas does not help to Unreal, as well as the low-resolution reflection. Unreal was using bloom that was missing in Unity as well as some other post-process effects (edges). Tone mapping is not the same. Unity floor shader material needs more specularity or less roughness. Wall UV mapping textures UV distribution was not equal. In Unity looking the frame looks like you are missing bump mapping or displacement. In Unreal sunshaft was missing and is possible to avoid the flickering shadow using a better and similar resolution. Awesome project, we need more of this but was not a fair comparison. Need some work to make them much. FPS was missing.

[@UGuruz]

Thanks for the detailed explanation. I am glad that you noticed all the detailed. It was my fist project with unreal so next time it definitively will be better.

[@SoaringSimulator]

@@UGuruz Super awesome first project! Congratulations

[@GameDevBeat]

i have used both engines and currently using Unity its an amazing engine . i really like to believe the Comparison are real .. DON'T get me wrong because the difference are almost nothing i wonder if you can make a small video Comparison in the editors for both engines ... thanks

[@UGuruz]

Yes, its real comparison . May be I will make a tutorial on both.

[@MrXv007]

@@UGuruz Perhaps a comparison of FPS and the stress on CPU and GPU. In my experience Unity HDRP is lighter on resources than Unreal.

[@kidsteveee]

I think it's really unhelpful to post a comparison of renders like this without mentioning which one was closer to what the artist intended. For example, there's a lot more bloom coming from the skylight at 3:00 in unreal, which reflects strongly off of the floor, but was this intended? Which one is more accurate to what was expected? It looks "better" in unreal, unless the goal was to make the lighting look diffused, in which case it looks way worse. The same can be said for the reflectiveness of the paintings, the depth of the shadows, the strength of the reflection off of the poles, etc...

[@albarnie1168]

I think it's pretty obvious that with those things it really just came down to user error. Its pretty clear that in the unreal version the light intensity is turned up a bit more, the floor has les roughness and the paintings have more smootness. EDIT: actually, the unreal one has a lower dynamic range

[@KronosTL]

This is the exact comparision I was looking for. But I would choose Unity because of how easy is to learn it, also because of the optimisation.

[@ZAYMANGAMESTUDIO]

Nice

[@CodingWithUnity]

Unity seems alot less Jittery but some shots in Unreal do look better as static non moving shots. Wish you would of shown the actual setup you were using on both programs tho!

[@AuroraGameworks]

Not the best of comparisons. Unreal Engine has depth of field turned on and Unity doesn't, whilst Unity has volumetric lighting on, and Unreal doesn't. Both engines have those features, so why not compare them properly?

[@TriSutrisnowapu]

I don't any significant difference.. Well done..

[@niw3]

It would be great if they added realtime stats

[@dulimongthe5278]

Which one performed better?

[@Linkario86]

With UE it's EASIER to make nice looking environment. With Unity you CAN get great graphics too, but it takes more time and effort to create the Textures and Models (via Blender for example, add some Substance Painter to it, which Costs) However C++, compared to C# that you can use with Unity, is harder to learn and takes you longer to script, because you have to deal with Memory yourself. Therefor C++ is extremely performant. UE5 has a sick system for its meshes and lighting now, but indies barely get that much storage for all that data. I'm sure Unity will catch up with that too, and storage likely gets even cheaper. My Oppinion: Use the suiting Engine for your current skills and the output you want. It really depends. I have both Installed and work with both of them. But I need to learn C++ cause the BP are really not performant. C# would be more performant. But the most performance you get with C++.

[@cg.man_aka_kevin]

In this video, Unreal Engine is more good at lighting, and Unity is more good at textures and reflections. But now, UE5 is a different thing...

[@Sismanski]

And why is Unity having no Bloom activated?

[@calmsh0t]

Wow, impressive how Unity has caught up!

[@charlesmasclef1309]

Unity have always been where they are. They always have been ahead of competitors when it comes to performances and stabilisation in general. Now that they really achieve it, they can start working more in depth in their graphical integration. You just need to compare the games made with the 2 engines. Unity always had the better physics, the better networking integration, the better sound encryption, the better lighting costs for the better fps. While, on the other hand, UE games have had great graphic but gamers always have had problem with all the other part of the engine. And don't get me started on their optimisation solution, remember when ARK came out and all internet was asking for a refund ?

[@cyberfalcon2872]

@@charlesmasclef1309 the thing is, unity is an indie favorite, so, most unity projects are low budget imo

[@maik9022]

@@charlesmasclef1309 Yeah, well, no. Unity better network integration? How many systems did they deprecate now? How many more will follow? And they still not have proper networking in place at all. In contrary to Unreal where it is pretty much a first class citizen. Ark had pretty shitty optimisation, true. But have you tried the simple looking (but awesome) game Bro-Force? It slows down to a crawl when stuff is going on, when it really should not. Actually Unity has a long history with performance complaints, more so than Unreal. Also wondering when they finally get their rendering pipelines properly in place. Although capable they are still a hot mess of confusion and stability issues(build-in, URP, HDRP). In reality the poor performance in both examples boils down to the developers incapability of actually optimizing their own game, both engines have the tools for that but you need to understand how to use them. Many Unreal or Unity developers just do not.

[@cKoVex]

Unity is the best game engine. Unreal Engine is harder to use.

[@erickvilela1954]

This video with terrible transitions are not helping to compare both products. Same sequence, split screen + high level setup/technique would help.

[@pavelpishchev3395]

What about FPS?? optimization? Engine is not just an image you get, but also how it loaded your hardware and so on.

[@UGuruz]

Both are running at 60fps on a mid range pc. I will make a video on that as well.

[@pavelpishchev3395]

@@UGuruz great, but honestly it's just interesting because of ms , also you should know that you can't really believe unity profiler, so I hope you didn't use it) (I'm 10 years of ex in unity,now in ue4)

[@jeffersonhighsmith7757]

Thanks for this. Wish I could find one that wasn't more than a year old.

[@edwinjata4301]

Both of these engines use the same graphics APIs so they can do the exact same things if you make the shaders the same. There is nothing to compare here.

[@hoiblij6737]

No that's not how it works. Graphics API's are nothing more than a bunch of functions that your gpu can use to calculate things. It's up to the render engine to call these functions, and there are a billion ways to combine them resulting in vastly different renders.

[@abelsierrasanchez2126]

This is not a fair comparison, there are no postprocess effects in the unity demo

[@amisner2k]

I like the piano music.

[@a3k747]

Awesome video!! But I noticed you are not using box projection on reflection probs in unity. Box projection will give you corrected reflections. other than that awesome video.

[@UGuruz]

Thanks for the feedback.

[@pushthebutton4602]

You should have the same camera path on both! Otherwise it was good, Some is better in Unreal and some is better in Unity. The main thing is that Unreal is free and Unity is not! So if you are new and only want to do artistic things and have No money go for Unreal. If you plan to make some money at the end like a Game, I think Unity is the best choose when that day will come, you dont pay royalty to unity as Unreal with 5% on every game that you sell that can be expensive at the end. I f you go for Unity dont buy it before you make some money, stick to the free version with some limitation until then. otherwise you will pay alot of money before you make any money. Just what I think. Thank for this video.

[@UGuruz]

Thanks for the info. Very useful for beginners.

[@leukk_]

The free unity version has everything the paid one does. Both engines are free unless you start making a certain amount of money.

[@gameexplorer4963]

I think people need more practice in HDRP before such comparisons are made. But what is seen here is that most differences are indeed in terms of color grading, post fx (DOF, Bloom, etc) and material tuning.

[@tufanstilinski1355]

Both Same and great

[@keenanrvndr]

Lighting and colors. I think, unreal has more realistic lighting. And also white and black values such as shadow, light intensity, and AO is rendered deeper than Unity. While unity has volumetric fog in this demo. Even though, unity and unreal are good for those who use them. Hard choices right?

[@rendericeib4513]

unity needs some extra bloom

[@HassanAliAnwar]

Reflections and glass looks better in Unity than Unreal, however lighting in general looks way better in Unreal. Unity lighting looks like a powdery/foggy light which is probably due to configuration.

[@armanamrazyan6609]

Would be better with FPS

[@dadlord689]

Something weird with shadows in UE4. They are jittering. So this is an engine bug or a bad showcase.

[@UGuruz]

Actually I just started working in Unreal. Basically I am a unity user.

[@dadlord689]

@@UGuruz Ok ) I think it could be solved, but engines are enough different. I was a fan of UE4, but after about 2 years of work I have learned that it is pain. So now I a am happy user of Unity )

[@BrushandBreeze]

will u please guide me how to render a video from unity please

[@tigerspidey123]

UE5: Try to enable FPS, and put in 100 billions of triangles then compare us.

[@redskull5482]

make a tutorial about android optimazation pls

[@gursimransingh8726]

unreal shadow flikering always puts me down i think its time to switch to unity

[@CinematicGames94]

I think both are great and the creator did say it was his first time using unreal but that aside they are both phenomenal in how they are presented as this is what the creator was able to produce and that he did not state how he wanted it to look like. It is all about what you can do and props to him for taking the time to use both engines. I think people should use both then decide which they will always fall back to or use both once you are set with how your projects will work and what project works well with what engine because I don't think any of these engines is better than the other and I use unity because it is easier even though I cant code to save my life but hey gotta learn it anyway and that is because I have only used unity so until I use another maybe that would be easier I don't know for sure but open to try other game engines because if you have to get a job at a game studio they might not use the engine of your choice so be open and less fanboying. Some Indies use one engine because they are set on it and that is great use what best suits you or learn both that is also fine. Game Engines are tools with powers of their own like an unstoppable force fist bumping an immoveable power

[@UGuruz]

Huge thanks for your feedback.

[@CinematicGames94]

@@UGuruz you are welcome sir

[@howto4646]

unity is very good engine and easy to understand but before the graphics were terrible and now it has competition with unreal engine 4 in graphics also

[@MEGA_TREE]

Just needs experience in Unity to make it better and nothing more

[@gursimransingh8726]

bro is that baked lighting in both the engines if so how are you moving light source

[@UGuruz]

It's real time lighting. I have made a full tutorial about that.

[@gursimransingh8726]

@@UGuruz UNREAL DO NOT HAVE REALTIME GI BUT IN THIS SCENE IT FEELS ITS USED HOW OR ARE YOU USING ENGIGHTEN

[@lb5928]

The depth of field is better in UE4. Also some specular highlights are missing in the unity version like on the floor. Otherwise they are practically the same.

[@krunalsolanki9231]

Which Unity version used for this render?

[@UGuruz]

Unity 2019.1

[@leaper7808]

These videos are always clearly biased towards Unity. They simply do better jobs in Unity with lighting and shading, than they do in Unreal. I wish there was a video of a Unity expert designing the same scene as an Unreal expert. That would be a truly fair comparison

[@jussivalter]

How do you know that? There are a ton comparison videos from both camp. Or is it that when UE looks better, UE is better, and when Unity looks better there must be some kind of biased work behind it? Some kind of cheating? C'moon...

[@minhduongthuong2178]

this DEMO too simple for comparison

[@dattan2850]

how simple is for comparison? Each engine have their own unique and flaws sir..

[@Oxmond]

Why always this discussion about whether Unity or Unreal is the best? Everyone should know that Notepad is the king! 😂

[@nobodycaresaboutyou5590]

I use command line in ms dos for photorealism

[@supriyakhanra9068]

U guys crazy I use BrainFuck for photorealism

[@manueltripero]

Quite impressed by Unity's shadow fidelity (and the ammount of artifacts UE has, probably due to TAA). Still, lighting looks "smoother" in UE, unity looks a little washed out. Still unity has been doing great improvement where UE used to be lightyears away.

[@UGuruz]

Yes there are some issues with shadows because I just started using unreal engine. I am also very impressed by the render quality in unreal.

[@manueltripero]

@@UGuruz Another thing I like about UE is that is more straightforward, you don't have to mess so much around with mixed, GI, baked, lightprobes, you bake and get good performance and great graphics by default. Unity kinda missed the plot by doing GI the prefered way of lighting IMO

[@UGuruz]

Yeah that's right.But the good thing is that you can adopt the same workflow in unity in just a few extra steps.

[@manueltripero]

@@UGuruz Not till they don't finish the GPU lightmapper, since enlighten for baking lightmaps is extremely slow. But they show they know where their problems are, and it's a good sign at least.

[@zenbane1876]

The title is misleading. This video shows your own skill with Unity vs Unreal. Not the engines themselves.

[@RoyalOaklok]

Unity is the best

[@bcgames92]

is there anything you can do about the sky in UE4? I notice that in many UE4 renderings the sky is washed out

[@UGuruz]

Yes, you can use custom sky cube maps but if you rendering a interior scene then the sky will always look washed out because this is how real world cameras work.

[@WalterRDK]

It is unity with HDRP?

[@UGuruz]

Yes.

[@k1ng121]

Unity has SSR and Materials. UE4 Has better lighting

[@Rastapapulus]

then why light flickers in UE4 ?

[@sfaqwerty]

please repose with FPS. same effects are irrelevant if the better looking one has same or better FPS.

[@vladkostin7557]

nice video. you probably messed up some Unreal settings a bit though. would love to see frame rates

[@chaosordeal294]

Well, you clearly sandbagged the Unreal visuals by using clumsy depth-of-field and bad transparency settings.

[@lowkeygaming4716]

I can't see the difference in 144p resolution. 😂 RIP internet connection.

[@TheAdventuresOfMontuMiah]

Hey you leaned over Unity.😁

[@cult2]

😢

[@vigosaurus4665]

73 dislikes are probably from unreal fanboy

[@cmorait]

Unreal look more realistic. Unity look more CG.

[@Hipernt]

your Material setup on Unity was a dumb, 2:10 even the rods are not shining. BTW I don't see any difference, The reason people says Unreal is better because of its default bloom effect and High contrast, But anyone can do that in Unity, Comparison is useless.

[@erfansh1925]

Unreal had some flickering issues But overall lighting and reflections in unreal are better

[@gameexplorer4963]

reflections were actually better in Unity. In Unreal they were too blurry for glass material. (which is a weakness of Unreal really Unity has crisp, physically correct reflections.) But you probably meant the seemingly lower resolution reflection textures which were apparent due to not being blurred in order to hide it like it was in Unreal.

[@gameexplorer4963]

@F.B.I AGENT I know because I have actually worked in similar and larger studios than those you mentioned, and I have worked with all major engines. Indeed many of the known games are made with Unreal, in the same way that many other known games are made with Unity. And other engines. Thing is, the most amazing huge blockbuster games are typically created with proprietary, off the shelf engines.

[@ColoradoJinx]

The first comparison video I've seen where the Unity version stomped Unreal.

[@Seedonator]

Thats the map designers fault

[@toasty082]

unity hiting diff

[@krypt2k25]

UE5 puts everything to shame if you have seen the trailer it's coming out really soon

[@Protomorphean]

I use Unity and prefer it. The Unreal "footage" looks more realistic, the lighting has more nuance and realism. Unity will be there soon enough tho.

[@danisaksson3214]

For the love of god, please remove the "Subscribe" button from the area where you're displaying relevant information. Not a huge problem, but just something that defeats the purpose of having the "Unity" icon in the first place.

[@fly2334]

unity 的光线稳定点

[@monabbar007]

why they won't work as single company unity make 2d games tooooooo good while unreal make 3d gmaes superrrrrrrrrrr realistic

[@daniil2704]

Юнити с HDRP уже почти как анреал, но все равно, свет в анриал обрабатывается лучше. Так же тени какие то в юнити не такие, выглядит пластмассовой как то.

[@MrEdu-cj2vl]

no 4k, no can't tell

[@Unknown_Man807]

Hope with out music ❤

[@gigigigiotto1673]

source 2 wins

[@valdirraimundodebarros7159]

Olá Também passei poraqui , gostei deixei o Like 👍 Show⚽⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

[@Vlad79X]

lemme guess you use unity

[@hoojeon770]

언리얼은 광원이 너무 과한느낌이야... 반대로 유니티는 반사가 너무 과한느낌이고

[@Rarkru]

Unity = camera view Unreal =eye view

[@sweet_krona]

Nope. I have just looked out of my window, and it looks closer to Unity graphics

[@monabbar007]

i will open a ureality and hier both company to make 4d games :)

[@ringoze]

Transition effects ruin the comparison.

[@takumikid]

unity

[@LimePharmacy2012]

Unreal looks really unreal (plastic) . Unity looks so real.

[@reyiz9622]

Unreal = Unity

[@哈比人-y1g]

"This is my first experiment with Unreal engine 4. I used almost same workflow in both engines and try to create similar results." Ain't that like you do watercolor paint for your entire life and compare to your first try on oil paint?

[@citizenbetelgeuse]

These comparisons don't really work when you deliberately don't use the full power of UE.

[@khawar4m]

his page name is unity, why would he show the real power of UE4. kzbin.info/www/bejne/b5emY2OEjM2ratU feel the power here

[@theopubdoukousap7019]

Why did he even show the real power of unity? He ignored bloom effects, blur effects etc etc in a variety of poses with unity where in UE they were used. Obviously he does not have much exp with both engines. So the video is quite not good example.

[@gameexplorer4963]

He has not used the full power of HDRP either. So I suppose that is ok. It is too early for such comparisons really.

[@theopubdoukousap7019]

@@gameexplorer4963 yes I agree completely. The differences of both engines are way to little if any in some features