Chavda sir is holding back a lot of things to avoid controversies..😝
@anonymous_12792 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/eaO8imxvhteWi9U
@_abhishekpal2 жыл бұрын
Faxx
@sampritiigoswami21362 жыл бұрын
😀 yep
@sagnikacharyya57772 жыл бұрын
@@dhruvsaklani6889 dont talk about your dad like that.
@kaaliyedekhtakyahai81932 жыл бұрын
Khudki history banana koi is chutiye se sikhe ye to india ke freedom struggle me tha yehi to sab jaanta hai baaki poorane historians to chutiya h 😂
@jithinnair35242 жыл бұрын
read Gandhis Experiment with Truth . Tumhe pata chal jayega vo kitne bade Mahatma the. Gandhi not just weakened us socially but also he weakened us mentally . This is not land of Gandhi , Nehru this the land of shivaji maharaj , raj rajendra chola , subash chandra bose , sardar patel and Vishnugupta Chanakya
@pankajshukla94382 жыл бұрын
Ohh is it? Have you read it ....wonder why a person write a book to let people hate him ... albeit he was that kind of man who unlike 99% of so called Great people hide their fallacies....if not 100% he tried to showcase his shortcomings more than that of any autobiographical work....but Romain Rolland,Tagore, Einstein, M.L.King junior, G.B.Shaw, and there are thousands many more contemporaries and others who shown a great administration for Gandhi .but nowadays people got to know some hidden forbidden truth thanks to historians like chiwda, poha etc.....all I can say Gandhi was and is really beyond some little shitheads
@jithinnair35242 жыл бұрын
@@pankajshukla9438 brother do you know that he supported the caliphet movement which had nothing to do with us indians he only supported it because majority muslim consider the caliphet the supreme, he wanted to please them and make them feel secure , but unfortunately there was an feeling of supiriority amongmajority muslims against hindus due to which moplah massacre happen . Gandhi didnt even condemn it.
@eutopean78222 жыл бұрын
@@jithinnair3524 Gandhi ji has his false policies but it is atrocious to brand him as anti india and british agent.
@dmx6222 жыл бұрын
I agree with you just bcz you didnt mention the name of cowards savarkar
@Mukulmeena1232 жыл бұрын
@@pankajshukla9438 You are right bro.These so called historians gain knowledge from what's app and facebook.Gandhi proved himself in champaran stayagrah, Ahmedabad mill strike and kheda satyagraha.He didn't get overnight fame.He worked at ground level and got fame from rural area especially.As a history student i acn say He is just biased and don't know anything about history.
@Editsxstation7 ай бұрын
M. Ali Jinnah , he supported the unity , worked for congress but he understood that there are rlly two different nations living in the sub continent, and he understood that the equality he was dreaming of , was not possible. He knew that no matter what he does for this sub continent , he will never have equal rights and freedom, and all Muslims will somewhat suffer , so he left congress and joined muslim league. When i was in junior classes i used to think he was wrong, we were all humans , we could've lived together happily but as time has passed my point of view has changed and i believe he was right
@noorfraz74403 ай бұрын
As a Pakistani, we were never taught anything negative about Gandhi rather we respect him as a simple man. As for our Jinnah We love him deeply.❤
@ayushmishra94502 ай бұрын
why will you hate ghandhi after partition also he was fighting for pakistans return money against india
@ahmedayub17232 ай бұрын
@@ayushmishra9450 you are told wrong , we as pakistanis never hate gandhi and respect him same like mr jinnah , because both were freedom fighters
@ayushmishra94502 ай бұрын
@@ahmedayub1723 jinna was fighting for breaking country later whereas others were interested in removing britishers. so jinna was not a freedom fighter for india
@niamatullah76922 ай бұрын
But you are against Khan Abdul ghaffar Khan because he was against the partition you called him gaddar
@noorfraz74402 ай бұрын
@@niamatullah7692 no I didn't brother
@akray1153 Жыл бұрын
Damn! So Abhijit is basically saying that Jinnah was more of an Indian patriot than Mahatma Gandhi at least at one point of time 😲
@Jehandaruwalla Жыл бұрын
When two people in the house fight they both love the house. They just hate each other.also his grandfather or father converted from hindu to Muslim so obviously he wouldn't hate india but still he did dat crap direct action n got hundreds f hindus killed
@monoranjanbezboruah340210 ай бұрын
Jinnah was never an Indian patriot, coming from a family that made lots of money from fish business, Jinnah like his father was very spiteful and was sick both physically (Cancer) and mean mentality. The British got in him what they were looking for toe enfeeble the emerging India. but the Partition, looking back was a Blessing. India today can Move On and Ahead with a great chunk of myopically induced rabid Islamists not being part of our Land! Islamists of this genre are rancid and are never a healthy constituent of any body-politic! Sadly, Kemal Attarturk is never the ideal leader for the rabid Islamists, and the consequences are vivid and open for all of us to see! Reminds One of the saying-you can only take a buffalo to waters, but the drinking has to be done by the buffalo him/her self!
@rahulverma94274 ай бұрын
India was actually ruled by indian kings. zamindars and britishers in ratio of50-50. so if your are against gandhi and think that violence gave us freedom then u r wrong. so it means violence against your own village head and local rulers. so it was an indian vs indian fight. but gandhi choose non violence as he know the fight was against dictatorship , dependence on britishers goods and resources.
@cartooneditz38233 ай бұрын
even what he says about jinnah and khilafat movement is not true . he is making his own assumptions and make it history
@aryamanroy24922 жыл бұрын
Gandhi was the best policeman the Britishers had in India BRITISH MP ELLEN WILKINSON
@Shashwatt2 жыл бұрын
Thoda padhe likhe hote toh itne chutiya nahi hote bhai
@pankajshukla94382 жыл бұрын
Context?pls? Mountbatten too called him one man boundary force ...do you know why??...forget about who says on whom what.....he might have said such things for himself when he was young and not very much aware of british atrocities and imperialist nature in south africa .....but later part of his life till the end he kept on fighting ....unlike self proclaimed 'veer' who in starting part fought hard but later part actually became british agent and pensioner ....ant jaisa waisa insan ...ant bhala to sb bhala
@aryamanroy24922 жыл бұрын
@@pankajshukla9438 If he was so good then why he was pleading to fight the war against natives who were against british atrocities in South Africa.
@aryamanroy24922 жыл бұрын
@@pankajshukla9438 And in the later half when he was in India he became mature enough to be regarded as Mahatma Then why the prophet of Non violence restricted his virtue when Indians were sent to world War he inspired them to fight for their colonial masters
@Putin.vladimir.official2 жыл бұрын
@@pankajshukla9438 If u think Gandhi got us independence, you must be a naive my friend.. He just came forward and took credit of all freedom fighter's struggle.. Glad that Godse killed this goon soon enough..
@bibekgope72152 жыл бұрын
Ranveer bhai Shaheed Bhagat singh ji ,Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose ji the Great Humans ke bhi podcast lawo ....🇮🇳
@JustAnotherVatsal2 жыл бұрын
They're both dead
@sandeepkumar-eq8nn2 жыл бұрын
Bhai tujhe te 3 naam he pta h kya
@anonymous_12792 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/eaO8imxvhteWi9U
@VSM1012 жыл бұрын
@@JustAnotherVatsal Ghandi is dead also Boses death is questionable #facts
@JustAnotherVatsal2 жыл бұрын
@@VSM101 Even if he survived the plane crash, a person born in 1897 wouldn't be alive today
@ratri61102 жыл бұрын
"Gandhi kohi sant Mahatma nehi hain valki ek chatur Politician hain" - Dr BR Ambedkar
@INSOMNI_A2 жыл бұрын
source : whatsapp university
@seemabongback92502 жыл бұрын
Source: trust me bro
@manjushabhatkulkar36742 жыл бұрын
Ye chal be br Ambedkar ne kaha tha ki Gandhi koi Mahatma nhi the ,naki ek chatur politician ,kuch bhi khud ka ghisa pita Gyan mat baat
@DM-zb8hw2 жыл бұрын
bhai br ambedkar jaise intellectual ko misquote kyu kar rha hai.
@ganeshbanerjee98412 жыл бұрын
@@manjushabhatkulkar3674 Ambedkar Mahatma the kya ?
@faixeee Жыл бұрын
When we see how Muslims are being treated in india, We thank GOD for Mr Jinnah. He saw that coming thats why he changed his views about hindu Muslim unity.
@pooravsankhyan7700 Жыл бұрын
Bro you have nice sense of humour
@MoaterRaja2 ай бұрын
@@pooravsankhyan7700and you have no sense of logic at all
@NamrataRao-q6w3 күн бұрын
Can u explain...how muslims are being treated in india !!!??
@saikatghosh59942 жыл бұрын
Indian history should be written again. This is important information for all of us
@faiezaftab Жыл бұрын
Yes and so should Pakistanis!
@ninadsentinel2 жыл бұрын
Very rightly said by Abhijitji. People who were considered as real threats were served capital punishments or life threatening imprisonment. We can check the history of such people, 1. Lokmanya Tilak imprisoned in Mandalay for 6 years on sedition charge, far away from mainland. 2. Chandrashekhar Azad martyred in gun fight. 3. Bhagat Singh death sentence 4. Lala Lajpatrai succumbed to his wounds while protesting against Simon Commission was lathi charged brutally by British police. 5. Swatantryaveer Savarkar locked up in far away Andaman prison for life sentence. Why was there no such severe sentence against Gandhiji? He was basically a safety valve to clear discontent in public.
@srikanthkantha87062 жыл бұрын
Because he was very Popular and People loved him....sometimes read books other than Whatsapp
@crayon73692 жыл бұрын
@@srikanthkantha8706 exactlly..
@ninadsentinel2 жыл бұрын
@@srikanthkantha8706 Can you provide evidence of this. Where was it admitted that government is helpless to punish Gandhiji because of his overwhelming popularity.
@suryanshshrivastava36132 жыл бұрын
@@srikanthkantha8706 people loved Netaji even more ,why did the British arrest him and be cruel to him then?
@kardiacc2 жыл бұрын
@@suryanshshrivastava3613 even Gandhi was put in jail
@akashyadao92782 жыл бұрын
Indian history have been interpreted by many writers through their own lenses. These lenses might have several motives behind it. So instead of coming to conclusions just by watching 10 mins podcast would be unfair. Keep on reading various books on Indian History and make your own unbiased narrative or I would say gain your own unbiased knowledge
@shashwatnandan50832 жыл бұрын
modi bhakt spoted
@akashyadao92782 жыл бұрын
@@shashwatnandan5083 arrey nhi re bhai modi bhakt nhi hun isliye bol Raha tha ki read karo
@manishkumarpandey97022 жыл бұрын
@@shashwatnandan5083 Liberandu spotted 😂😂 who can't even realise he's not supporting anyone 😒
@user-oe4wv6kv4r2 жыл бұрын
@@shashwatnandan5083 keju namaji spotted
@trendchanger56522 жыл бұрын
I think one of the most sensible comments
@superstarof962 жыл бұрын
Abhijit Sir should write uncensored versions of textbooks.
@pankajshukla94382 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂 If chiwda writes his wishful blabbering and half baked knowledge and sell it as History book ...but then, can such shit be called as history at first place....is he entitled enough to write a book forget about history book. Chiwda, aur uske aadarsh rhe honge P.N.Oak aise log ki history books jab log pdhne ke liye kahe to smjhho bahut jyada gobar fail chuka h
@celestialkakashihatake46972 жыл бұрын
@@pankajshukla9438 bhai poocho mat Kya hi kahen ab 🤣 And people get influenced do easily. These monstrous people have such an incredible way of moulding facts into their favours to make people Anti Gandhi. Just imagine.
@kritagya.Rajawat2 жыл бұрын
**CONSPIRACY THEORIES OF TEXTBOOKS
@sankalpranjan18632 жыл бұрын
Ya like Vivek Agnihotri is already rewriting history.
@abi-wg4jt2 жыл бұрын
@@pankajshukla9438 Abe loWde 🤣🤣🤣🤣 abhijit chavda ki joh qualification hai na tere khandan me kisi ke pass nahi hoga , counter Kar iske points facts ko joh abhijit ne Bola abhijit ne khud Bola documents online hai ja padh ke aa fir bakwas Kar tune toh aajtak mustafa Kamel ataturk ka naam tak nahi suna hoga aur bahot bada wala historian ban raha hai idhar 🤣, tarki 🤣chica nehru toh Adarsh nahi hai na abhijit chavda kya🤣🤣🤣🤣 , aaj joh history kitaab me Ramachandra guha, Irfan Habib, Romila Thapar ne gobR Kiya hai wohi gobR tu idhar Kar raha hai mu se 🤣
@tondon18512 жыл бұрын
I have always doubt about Gandhi from my childhood. For me I couldn't digest his participation in freedom fighting against British.
@vaibhavvaidya13962 жыл бұрын
Same here
@nagatv83992 жыл бұрын
Nothing can help you
@ajaypandeyy112 жыл бұрын
Same from class 4th
@UPOLArnaabAnand2 жыл бұрын
It is very sad that you have such doubts about Mr. Gandhi. This podcast isn't truth. I will suggest rather read books other than listening these podcasts where there are only assumptions without quoting any source. Hope you won't mind my opinion .
@tondon18512 жыл бұрын
@@UPOLArnaabAnand if u look entire indian freedom movement then u will get all answers. How manipulate our history by our government, left, islamic groups, some people's ego.
@tattiparry2 жыл бұрын
I love how her never says Mahatma Gandhi, instead says Mohandas or Mr Gandhi 🥰
@clearshot13152 жыл бұрын
"Mahatma" Is Respectful word, Mahatma is not a name 😌
@hemangshrivastava95612 жыл бұрын
GANDHI was by default Mahatma.
@ganeshbanerjee98412 жыл бұрын
हां बेटा। आज के महात्मा तुम्हीं हो
@AfzalKhan-xg8uv Жыл бұрын
True! Even Dr. BR Ambedkar openly said that Gandhi never deserved the title of 'Mahatma'.
@No_Name-qu7co Жыл бұрын
Sif buddha.. Isse jada respect nehi de sakte
@adequatestuff81442 жыл бұрын
When I was a kid, I used to wonder how did we get independence Because it was not clearly mentioned in the books. It just stated several historic events of Gandhi and never talked about actual freedom fighters. And it was always in mind.... " So we just fought on behalf of Britain and they just left, ghanta " 🤷♂️
@Anonymous-ee9kq Жыл бұрын
Plus hamara sara paisa le gaye
@Kapanzzchannl Жыл бұрын
Group of people in who never fight against British is rss. Now they are ruling country. Gandhi, indian national Congress and subhash chandra their involvement in freedom fight is history. There are several moments in history.you can criticize them. But can't deney their role. Remember one thing rss as a group never fight against british. Never conduct a program against British. Or freedom fight.
@chitrakochak8154 Жыл бұрын
@@Kapanzzchannl But you can't avoid the sacrifice of freedom fighters like Chandra Shekhar Azad, Bhagat Singh, Jatin Das and many more by saying that we got independence because of Gandhi, Nehru, etc. that's true Netaji Bose did it very very much for our country
@niranjan7602 Жыл бұрын
Sare jhut hai bhai. Jinnah only power me ane chah te the isiliye desh bibhajit hua.Jinnah apne dharm ke liye khadha rahe the aur unko muslim legue leader the jo ki britisher ke dwara kiya gaya tha kyun ki congress britisher ke khilaf dhire dhir ho rahe the. Jinnah apne dharm ke liye alag desh demand kar raha tha. Biswas nehi hota ta khan sir ki vedio dekhlo.🙏
@pritam_chavan1011 ай бұрын
@@Kapanzzchannlstop your gulamgiri. Who founded the Congress ? Britishers. How many Congress presidents ,top leaders got shot or killed by Britishers? Zero.
@zaidshaikh18552 жыл бұрын
What he said about Gandhi is precisely word to word, similar to the foreword of Arundhati Roy in Ambedkar's Annihilation of Caste. Read that, it's a very good piece on the other side of Gandhi. So when Amit Shah called him Chatur Baniya he wasn't all that wrong. He wanted Imperial Brotherhood with the British Army, be an Imperial Brother. He helped the British while they were killing the Zulus. Usmain bhi British ne Aukaat Dikhaadi Ki Bhai Tu Ambulance Chalaa. And Gandhi, supported the Khilafat Movement, because his ambitions were more significant than just being the father of the nation of India, but a Father for all Colonies of the British. He was all about Marketing.
@ejazahmedatheist59782 жыл бұрын
U should read Ambedkar on Islam.. kzbin.info/www/bejne/hWrZkJWKiamYl7s
@eutopean78222 жыл бұрын
Why should I believe tukde tukde gang arundhati roy . If u r supporting her, u r an anti national.
@zaidshaikh18552 жыл бұрын
@@eutopean7822 Yeah whatever. I support her. Go ahead do what you want 😂😂😂. And he has quoted her verbatim then.
@zaidshaikh18552 жыл бұрын
@@eutopean7822 And Loudu Your words don't matter. Here is on your face Arundathi is love
@Noone-wo8kh2 жыл бұрын
Khilaf movement was against Britain who were occupying Ottoman empire
@ahsanarshad918 Жыл бұрын
As a Pakistani our textbooks also follow a certain narrative. They do tell about Jinnah’s affiliation with Congress and his stance for unity but then they quickly mention that Quaid himself got to this conclusion of two nation theory. As you said in the video, in our textbooks there’s hardly anything bad mentioned about Gandhi g. They just mention this big narrative of Hindus vs Muslims and never portray Gandhi G as villain. At the end of day the narrative that Gandhi and Jinaah fought for the freedom is a big exaggeration in both the countries. Reality is Britain was broke after ww2 and they just didn’t have enough resources and power to maintain their rule. So jaaty jaaty b aesi divide ki ha k ub socho to khayal aata ha k is se acha na hi divide karty. Khud Quaid e Azam sahab to 1 saal baad chalay gaey bechary aur hum phass gaey hain because totally 11 people make decisions for us and we have unofficially defaulted.
@A1-Driving974 Жыл бұрын
It is because of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose and INA's war Then across India the revolts by army, navy started British had to quit The opportunists rose and got credit
@tasmiamuskan Жыл бұрын
bewkoof hamay ibadhat tho apni marzi say kar sakte h qurbani kar sakte h waha k musulman ko tho ghae zaba karnay ki ijazat hi nhi h
@naeemameen5696 Жыл бұрын
تو اگر اکٹھے رہتے تو نہ تب نہ پھنستے؟ تب تو اپنی مرضی کا کھانا بھی نہ کھا پاتے جیسے مثلاً مسلم اکثریت والی اکلوتی سٹیٹ جموں و کشمیر تک میں مسلمانوں پر بیف کھانے پر پابندی اور سزائیں ہیں۔ پنجاب سندھ میں بھی یہی کچھ ہوتا۔ اور بھائی یہ تو بتاؤ کہ برٹش انڈیا ایک نیشن سٹیٹ کب اور کیسے بن گیا تھا۔ ٹھیک ہسٹاریکل ایویڈنس کے ساتھ جواب دینا ہے۔ جو قوم اپنے ہی دھرم کے کروڑہا کروڑ لوگوں کو اچھوت ، پلید سمجھتی ہو وہ مسلمانوں کو ساتھ ملا کے نیشن سٹیٹ بناتی۔۔۔ ارے واہ۔۔۔ چلیے جناح تو 1935 کے آس پاس دو قومی نظریے کی طرف مائل ہوئے تھے،،، یہ بتائیے کہ اس سے پہلے سے ہمیشہ سے مسلمان کانگرس کو اپنی نمائندہ پارٹی بنانے سے کیوں عملاً انکار کرتے چلے آ رہے تھے۔ اگر کانگرس ایک قومی جماعت تھی،،، اور جناح بھی سالہا سال اسکے لیڈر رہے تھے تب بھی مسلمان کانگرس کو ووٹ کیوں نہیں دیتے تھے۔ تب تو جناح کا کوئی قصور نہ تھا۔
@aniketmeshram6598 Жыл бұрын
Brother, if at all we are willing to desolve the hardest rock, it demands a lot of time and gradual weathering .Just like that basically the relationship between Gandhiji and Mohd Ali ji Jinnah whethered over a time period . I would say in my opinion which might be controversial that Jinnah never wanted a concept of Pakistan , they used this tool as a means to bargain." If you won't give us Pakistan give us A,B,C D and they use to win that negotiation. Main culprit behind behind Muslim league losing trust in Congress was Congress itself. When Muslim league demanded Separate communal electorates, Congress was aware of the concequeces of denying the demands, just to have the support in upcoming elections they falsely claimed to fullfill their demands.. When time came, Congress turned upside down. 1st reason to initiate the flame
@aniketmeshram6598 Жыл бұрын
2nd Jb civil disobedience ke planning chlri thi Tb Gandhiji ne Jinnah ji see ye kaha tha ki violence nai hona chahiye kisi bhi situation mee, kyuki phr States ko kuch samay nai lagega movement ko compromise krne keliye, Lekin however violence ho hee gyaa, Malabar coastal areas mee Hindu Muslims violent hogye, Aur Chauri Chaura incident ke baad sidha Gandhiji ne civil disobedience movement suspend kr diyee Ali Brothers jo is movement kee vice decision making process ke position pe thee, unhe ye chiz bilkul psnd nai aai ki ...unka manna tha ki atleast hum wo movement sirf UP me hee suspend krwate puree India jb iss movement nee grip pkdi suddenly suspend kr diyee , humse Bina advise leke apne ye decision liyaa ..( in nutshell) ye humare Indian modern history ka aakhri movement tha jb Hindu Muslim saath milkr Azaadi ki jung ldhee.. Kyuki iske baad over-all Muslim league jo Jinnah jee aur Ali brothers ke co operation se ldh rahe thee, unka bharosa Gandhiji see uth chuka thaa
@rishan23292 жыл бұрын
Thanks a ton Mr. Ranveer and Avijit sir. From this podcast I have known and learnt lot of things about Gandhi and Mohammed Zinna. Frankly speaking, for the first time i hear that Sergent Mohondas Gandhi...goosebumps 😲 At a time he was in military in South Africa. Actually this question always hit me and I am also so curious that how did Gandhi come in the super and supreme power in congress than how USA become superpower country in the world.
@pranay_kumar2 жыл бұрын
True, also i used to think how come a poor person go to south africa at that times which is said in books Too much falsehood. And he got mahatma ironically 😂😂. Gods play
@KUCHBHI-xk4mn2 жыл бұрын
@@pranay_kumar Ghandhi never said that he his poor . Tum sala log just perception bana lete ho dhoti deke
@onlykite912 жыл бұрын
totally false information given by trs
@masternobin2 жыл бұрын
@@pranay_kumar Parai likhai to kabhi kare nahi honge tumne, bass angreji pelna hai
@pranay_kumar2 жыл бұрын
@@masternobin OK Ahmed😁
@lakshminarayananraghavendr319 Жыл бұрын
Informative
@Abhinav-yk8zq2 жыл бұрын
Jinnah's secularism is very controversial....He married a Parsi girl and happily converted her to Islam but when her daughter Dina wanted to marry a Parsi man Wadia he opposed that by saying that he is not a Muslim and a Muslim can't marry a Non Muslim....But when Dina asked Jinnah that he too married a non Muslim , her mother then he replied cunningly that her mother converted to Islam
@dn94162 жыл бұрын
That's what they said in video , young Jinnah was secular but later on with age and Gandhi and other dominance he became kattar muslim it seems
@Abhinav-yk8zq2 жыл бұрын
@@dn9416 But then again comes a contradiction from his own position when India was divided and Pakistan got its independence Mr Jinnah said that "this country is for minorities and every religion is gonna be equal in this new country"....So he again became secular....I can't understand this confusing change of personalities again and again
@abhyudayabhinandan15202 жыл бұрын
@@Abhinav-yk8zq He might had promised but as we all know politicians are made for false promises so he might had done the same
@Tejasisphoenix2 жыл бұрын
jinnah never became kattar muslim ...he just pretended because it was good for his politics ...jinnah was extremely brilliant and highly educated from best of universities ...he used to drink alcohol and eat pork ...u can have insight into his mind ...as soon as pak was created he again went back to his secular roots ..his first speech after partition was all about hindu muslim unity and good relations with india ....so basically he fooled muslim masses...it was not change in personalities but cunning realpolitik ...
@Abhinav-yk8zq2 жыл бұрын
@@Tejasisphoenix But what he said to his daughter when she asked him to marry a Parsi man is a sign of jihadi mentality
@ankurtiwari76552 жыл бұрын
Everybody here should know that i m not concluding anything..but remember "Gandhiji was a politician first before anything"
@dmx6222 жыл бұрын
He was an lawyer
@anil61912 жыл бұрын
@@dmx622 yes same we call them liar
@aniketshukla38242 жыл бұрын
@@anil6191 Yes probably because you didn't go to school.
@anil61912 жыл бұрын
@@aniketshukla3824 i am not talking to you can't you see whom i replied
@aniketshukla38242 жыл бұрын
@@anil6191 Well he wasn't talking to you either. Why did you reply to his comment? You clod first see what you are doing then point your filthy fingers towards others.
@abidfarooqui48992 жыл бұрын
As a Pakistani American who grew up in Pakistan till 18+, I can tell you Pakistanis are not taught to hate Gandhi or Nehru. Nehru is given a tinge of negativity as compared to Gandhi. They are taught very little about them and what they are taught is fairly neutral. Gandhi's non-violent movement is mentioned. They are taught more about Sir Syed Ahmed Khan than Gandhi for instance. Unlike popular belief in Indian KZbin channels, Pakistani high school students are also not taught to hate Hindus. Rather they are taught Muslim history in Indian sub-continent in such a way that one starts to identify with that identity. That does not mean one starts to hate Hindus nor was that ever that came across to me. I am generally shocked to see what these KZbin videos show as to what supposedly Indians believe Pakistanis are taught. Now what they teach the poor in madrasas specially ones established in late 80's and onwards that teach the Salafi version of Islam ... I do not know.
@abhinavkashyap54272 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/gWKzZYSwaM-JeJI
@deepalijoshi22642 жыл бұрын
Jaise Gandhiji ne likkha 'I beg...' waise he Veer Savarkar ji ne bhi to 'I beg.. ' likka. But hamesha Veer Savarkar ko hi kyu nicha dikhaya jata hai?
@nsundu1237 ай бұрын
Nehra ji ne love letters likhe and Bose ji ko war criminal bola woh bhi aana chahiye saamne
@allaboutcricket56084 ай бұрын
Because gandhiji ne fir bhi virodh Kiya sorry Bolne ke baad ...gandu savarkar toh Brittish ka chamcha ban gya tha kaalapani ke baad
@Durvasangram3 ай бұрын
Congress agenda hai. Veer Savarkar was much bigger man n competent freedom fighter than lehru, this is what nehru feared about his image , since then Veer Savarkar image is being shamed n maligned.
@aniketshukla38242 жыл бұрын
As a student of history, it is awful to see a historian use the "internet" as a primary source for his writings. I can clearly see the ideological bent of mind here. Tells me that he is not a genuine historian. Your views about non-violence and other Gandhian Principles tells me that you're a real shoddy historian if a historian at all.
@Mukulmeena1232 жыл бұрын
Absolutely right, they are just fancy so called self proclaimed historians.He said I don't whatever he did in South Africa for 25 years?? Really, he fought for black people, that's it.But this Chavda is ideologically biased, I can understand a history student never accept these facts.
@apurvabhusari20492 жыл бұрын
He may or may not be a British agent but he is actually a highly mediocre self centric political selfish person who thought of just himself no one else.
@aniketshukla38242 жыл бұрын
@@apurvabhusari2049 False.
@somnathbhattacharjee47112 жыл бұрын
@@Mukulmeena123 what your thoughts on our independence how we got it through peace talks or revolting.
@aniketshukla38242 жыл бұрын
@@somnathbhattacharjee4711 A combination of both. Also its so much more than just peace talks and revolts.
@ammadbhatti5712 жыл бұрын
Mr jinnah saw the hatered in hindus for muslims he saw the current mindset way before
@sonusonu-qv4op2 жыл бұрын
You people hate everyone you proving this for 1400 years 😂😂😂
@sulimankhan83223 ай бұрын
jinah was ur baap@@sonusonu-qv4op
@A1-Driving9743 ай бұрын
@sulimankhan8322 Why Allah couldn't save Prophet (pbuh) from poison Or he did not want save Prophet (pbuh) from poison for the crimes he committed Or why Prophet (pbuh) himself save himself when he has the power to fly to moon on a donkey and broke the moon into 2 pieces?? These are some questions troubling me and i am unable to answer from Christian friends , can you help with proper and logical answers so I can shut the mouths of some disbelievers Ask your imam and come
@hammadsagheer80483 ай бұрын
@@A1-Driving974Everyone who is given birth has to die so did hazrat Muhammad pbuh Allah if wants shows miracles through prophets.Even prophet Muhammad pbuh was unable to do those miracles without Allah's will What Allah wanted is what happened What do u imagine prophet Muhammad pbuh could have not died
@hammadsagheer80483 ай бұрын
@@A1-Driving974Allah did not want to save him from death
@rohitvishal41362 жыл бұрын
He couldn’t remember a Muslim freedom fighter other than one and how cute of him to start the podcast saying ‘smart banne aaye ho na’😅
@Nigoto_Saituri2 жыл бұрын
@@mohdsalique7606 Bas yahi 3-4 naam hain, baki sab gaddar
@aquibalamLUMOS2 жыл бұрын
@@Nigoto_Saituri Hazrat Allama Fazal haq khairabad I Prof Abdul Bari Maulvi wajid Ali panni Maulvi Abdul Rasul Mian Mansoor Ansari Peer Ali khan Abdur Rahman Mahmud Hasan Saifuddin kitchlew Maghfoor Ahmad Ajaazi Hafiz zameen Shahid Abdullah Nanotwi Abul Kalam Azad Badruddin Tayyabji Asaf Ali ( also fought bhagat singh case) Muhammad Ali Jauhar Hasrat Mohani Abdul Bari firangi Tafazzul Hussain Khan of Farrukhabad Maulana Alauddin Turrebaz Khan (also called Turrem Khan) Abul Kalam Azad
@aquibalamLUMOS2 жыл бұрын
@@mohdsalique7606 bro don't come in defense we have rich history MashaAllah
@sunnymitra63722 жыл бұрын
@@aquibalamLUMOS How many of them Died Fighting the British???
@aquibalamLUMOS2 жыл бұрын
@@sunnymitra6372 go to India gate and read the names of dead soldiers you will be surprised to know that more than 50% of those are muslims. If you don't believe me verify yourself
@kingslayer20382 жыл бұрын
In champaran satyagraha, which gandhi hijacked to his own political profit it was Raj kumar Shukla a local peasant leader who initiated the movement. He pleaded gandhi umpteen times to join it.Gandhi refused to participate in it Raj Kumar Shukla kept pleading but to no avail. When the movement became widespread Gandhi jumped into wandwagon and later on historians erased Raj Kumar shukla's name from the movement completely and made gandhi savior of indigo farmers.
@srinivasaniyer62192 жыл бұрын
mohandas was a loyal servant of the queen.
@kingslayer20382 жыл бұрын
@@srinivasaniyer6219 yes he was yet he is a mahatma to some
@NativeIndian13102 жыл бұрын
Shukla convinced/begged Gandhi to join the movement and later Gandhi joined with his activist. After Gandhi's joining the movement, it became famous in India. Gandhi was a brand at that time even if he was a politician from inside. Without him that satyagraha would be no where.
@kingslayer20382 жыл бұрын
@@NativeIndian1310 Gandhi was new entrant in freedom struggle, how come he was famous overnight ? Please read the whole story again. It's an NCERT 12th English literature chapter called indigo. People didn't even know him then how come he became savior overnight.
@sunnymitra63722 жыл бұрын
@@NativeIndian1310 Gandhi was a Brand??? Very Interesting.
@rockerig88622 жыл бұрын
Gandhi didn't become famous overnight in India, it's his struggle in South Africa that made him famous
@pritam_chavan1011 ай бұрын
People in south africa calls him racist. 😂
@pritam_chavan1011 ай бұрын
He didn't give us Freedom
@surajgore78144 ай бұрын
@@pritam_chavan10Abe comment karne se pehle thodi si history padh leta
@sisthebest48103 ай бұрын
Ab iska propaganda hai isliye Gandhi ji ko kuch bhi bol raha hai😂
@1602parag Жыл бұрын
Chavada sir is a legend in assessing historical facts. He has connected the dots pretty well as far as MG and MJ are concerned. Earlier I used to doubt MG, but now I am 200% sure about his intentions back then.
@AnjaliChoudhary-g1s Жыл бұрын
Gandhi g 7 bar jail gye yeh to btaya ni isne...ulta unko british agent bol rha ...mahatma gandhi was and will always remain extra ordinary human being ...yeh jo bkwaas kr rha isko pta h kam dimag wale logo ko manipulate krna bhut easy h ...shameless weird creature spreading hate...
@divineehealingsounds65272 жыл бұрын
ranveer looks like we need to revise our academics,thanks for the information
@Abhay_._2 жыл бұрын
Lol true
@pankajshukla94382 жыл бұрын
Yes indeed we need to revise our academics and our textbooks....it should be on the lines of recommendation of books by Chiwda poha sir ....from 6 to 12 ...8-10 history books....5-6 should be devoted to ancient history ...2-3 on Aryan invasion theory and ..1-2 on ved and puranas .. we should skip medieval history altogether...maybe some chapters on chatrpati shiva ji ,Maharana oratap,hemu,orithwiraj and other hindu kings could be there and about morder indian history...all references of Gandhi nehru and congress should be done away with ....bhagat singh and other revolutionaries plus shubhas and patel should be taught but more emphasis should be on Golvarkar,Hedgewar and veero ke veer veer savarkar....subhas,bhagat singh's leftist leaning should not be disclosed only their nationalistic activities should be taught....that would be I guess some what saffronized history todays Gennext demand and deserve...we deserve this kind of history only ...and rather than school this history should be taught over fb, youtube, whatsapp....so that people engage more....and paint gandhi nehru mughal as black as u can so that feeling of nationalism and hindu rastra could be strengthened....for this very day Tagore wrote his poem....where mind is without fear and knowledge is free...this paradise he would have been talking...Alas😓
@kopkiller48742 жыл бұрын
A great broadcast . Very informative
@mansichitari2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Ranveer sir for bringing such talented people on your show. I like all your podcasts... And hats off to genius mind Abhijit Chavda . I love your duo.
@Vaibhav25_2 жыл бұрын
And i love you ☺️
@anonymous_12792 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/eaO8imxvhteWi9U
@Putin.vladimir.official2 жыл бұрын
@@Vaibhav25_ SIMP
@maryamghaffar97910 ай бұрын
Young Jinnah wanted to keep things together, struggled for freedom wholeheartedly. Being in congress and observing things from so close made him turn into the older Jinnah. Except the truth, know the reason... He was an intellectual n a great observer. u can't fool a wise man for long. he knew that before British Raaj Subcontinent was ruled by Muslims also, he realized that the position of Muslims has become much weaker. it's just that he did not want his ppl to compromise over anything.
@ayansarkar78082 жыл бұрын
Everytime sir said Mohandas Gandhi Instead of ‘Mahatma' 😄
@Jyotithakur3188 Жыл бұрын
Me too saying like this
@sisthebest48103 ай бұрын
Iske bolne se kuch nahi hota. Mahatma Gandhi ji hamare dil mai hai. Tum logon ki aukaat pe raho jitna bhi hate karo Gandhi ji ko but Independence Day per Gandhi ji ko yaad karna he padta hai yaad hai na kon karta hai flowers k saath yaad? 😂😂😂
@jagannath3452 жыл бұрын
Dusmano ne Bharat ka itna nuksan nahi kiya jitna gaddaron ne kiya hai.
@sisthebest48103 ай бұрын
Dushman aur Ganddar? Waah 😂
@AryanKhan-z3r2 ай бұрын
Haan jaise ke tum log karrahe ho
@jagannath3452 ай бұрын
@@AryanKhan-z3r Tujhe kyun mirchi lag raha hai be .
@SN8-v8hАй бұрын
@@jagannath345 sbse bade gaddar to andhbhakt h 😊😊
@FaizanAzim Жыл бұрын
I am from Pakistan. And there is so much we haven’t been told. Why? I have no idea. The idea of partition came from where? We don’t know. We were always put in dark. By the way I follow both of these gentlemen and they are extremely talented. Love from Pakistan
@eleghari10 ай бұрын
The idea of partition came from the British and was implemented through Jinnah and Gandhi...Neither was serving their people...both were serving their master!
@Doshanbe3 ай бұрын
Yaddi k yeh Modi k mouthpiece hein
@panjabipandit2 жыл бұрын
Imagine going from dedicating decades of your life to Hindu Muslim unity to then becoming the face of Islamist separatism and being the face of mass migration, g/nocide and the horrors of partition. Goes to show that humans are capable of anything when it comes to ego and power. The same goes for Gandhi.
@humanclay91312 жыл бұрын
It goes for a repeated betrayal by hindu community and lust for power against the actual Patriots of this land !
@humanclay91312 жыл бұрын
It goes for a repeated betrayal by hindu community and lust for power against the actual Patriots of this land !
@xGAMER_chimpX2 жыл бұрын
Hindus are not forced to say all hu akbar in muslim countries But you can’t say the same for Indian Muslims Plus hindus discriminate within their own religion and really hardcore discrimination at that too Then how can they be fair to muslims or others in india And this is proven over and over again JINNAH WAS RIGHT
@abdullahamir1192 жыл бұрын
This doesn't mean that Jinnah wasn't saddened by these events.
@onenerdindian422 жыл бұрын
@@xGAMER_chimpX Sunni muslims and Shiya muslims fight a lot in those Islamic nations you mentioned sir. And their discrimination is much worse than the discrimination between 2 hindus. And hindus are not forced to say Alahu akbar Yes you are correct. They are first converted into islam And then those converted muslims say that phrase. Ex- Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan. Dont believe me than read about the population of hindus since 1947 in these countries and compare it with the population of muslims in India since 1947 and then tell me what do you mean by oppression
@PG241083 ай бұрын
This podcast is great! It would be amazing if you could invite Brahmvihari Swami from the BAPS Swaminarayan Sanstha for an episode. He's a dynamic speaker who offers profound insights into spirituality, leadership, and personal development. BAPS is a worldwide spiritual and humanitarian organization known for its inspiring leadership, cultural preservation, and extensive charitable efforts. Their temples are architectural marvels, and their community service projects have made a significant impact globally. Having Brahmvihari Swami on the podcast would provide listeners with a unique perspective on living a balanced and meaningful life. Hope to see this collaboration soon!
@anujguleria8586 Жыл бұрын
Hume azadi khoon se mili non violence se nai ..jai hind ...jai hindurastra🕉️🇮🇳
@muhammadtalha8207 Жыл бұрын
Totally agree with the comments said on Last. We Pakistanis always respect Gandhi and other Indian National Hero's. There is a dire desire in educated youths of both countries to get to know each other, I hope there will be a day come where We can go to Amritsar and eat chola bathora and you guys can come to Lahore and enjoy our karahi''s. Lets Vote for peace and harmony among us.
@iamnoob7593 Жыл бұрын
indian culture is unique with its diversity. India is economically way superior with masssive 3.5T $ . There should be total close of borders.
@pritam_chavan1011 ай бұрын
There will never be peace among us until you solve your religion
@MUHAMMADmohsin317832 ай бұрын
@@pritam_chavan10what about your religion??? just watch a movie which is famous in "india" named as "pk" in this movie u’ll see how u can solve ur religion!!!
@pritam_chavan102 ай бұрын
@@MUHAMMADmohsin31783 😂 lol
@pritam_chavan102 ай бұрын
@@MUHAMMADmohsin31783 like what?
@brocodegaming22722 жыл бұрын
Mahatma Gandhi was curse of India and Indians to and we call father of nation but the real truth is shubhash Chandra Bose ji the real hero of india
@rajarshighosh48212 жыл бұрын
A lie when constantly repeated becomes the truth.
@ThinkDeep_Official Жыл бұрын
RSS version
@preparation.for.exam.2 жыл бұрын
If i am not wrong you are saying because jinnah was sidelined after arrival of gandhiji ,he was upset and then joined muslim league But ,jinnah joined muslim league in1913 and gandhiji returned in 1915,(according to known records) so your logic is false, if not then plz provide the dates and source of dates of joining of jinnah 's in muslim league and return of gandhiji
@notme8982 жыл бұрын
Are ye chawda apne man ki theory bta Raha hai ,isse jyada history to koi ssc ki taiyari karne vala jaanta hoga
@UchihaItachi-zt6us2 жыл бұрын
If you think you will get your answer like you are saying then you are mistaken. The whole education system was molded by the Marxist historians. Only by reading each and every book available of that time you will get the ans. Some stupid people think anything you find on google is the Perfect Truth. Grow up google is not a crystal ball that give you ans on their own, the answers are put in the google by humans. 😆😆😆
@preparation.for.exam.2 жыл бұрын
@@UchihaItachi-zt6us the textbook and google says the same thing, if anybody says it is false , then he should provide the source or proof that it is false ,merely making an accusation only shows cynical mentality and nothing else
@faiezaftab Жыл бұрын
Muslim league was made in1905 and Mr. Jinnah joined in 1913. Right
@Col.JamesTodd2 жыл бұрын
At 0:26 ... Ye suru hone pehle hi khatam hai... 😂😂
@Youtoo2107 ай бұрын
In my small opinion Gandhiji's one of the major contribution in Indian consciousness was that he taught us find a creative way of functioning with whatever is available at your disposal, yo find in you what can't be taken away, turned down by anyone else, something which you originally posses and take a stance of your rightful duty, like a gentleman without using violence at all. This was unique at the time Gandhi came in Indian politics. People got a fresh start with leader who acts more down to earth than the poorest but whose willpower is stronger than the Empire itself. Gandhiji's policy of allowing the oppressor any opportunity to change his 'heart' is hardly found in any mass struggle of the world. That makes him a true Mahatma. But no one is beyond criticism. A constructive criticism is good always. Thank you
@sandeep_bajpai2 жыл бұрын
Mohd Ali and Shaukat Ali began discussing about the agitation and gandhiji thought that this was the chance of bringing muslims under unified national movement
@Rahul-ur5rc2 жыл бұрын
Nutshell - " Jinnah was right, Gandhi was wrong"
@deepshere2 жыл бұрын
Was right initially*
@BROLY3922 жыл бұрын
Jinnah zindabad
@truetalk53782 жыл бұрын
I don't think so
@BROLY3922 жыл бұрын
@@truetalk5378 hah😂 gobar mind people don't think so
@truetalk53782 жыл бұрын
@@BROLY392 people who gain knowledge from WhatsApp and Instagram think like you those who don't know shit but they speak 😂
@ziavision94262 жыл бұрын
Jinnah was reminded that once when he was in congress he was an ambassador of Hindu Muslim Unity. Jinnah said that yes he was once a student of primary class.
@Kapanzzchannl Жыл бұрын
The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) was founded on September 27, 1925, by Keshav Baliram Hedgewar. At that time, India was still under British colonial rule, and the primary focus of the RSS was not to fight against the British colonial government. Instead, its main objective was to promote a sense of cultural and national identity among Hindus and instill a sense of discipline and character through physical fitness and ideological education. During India's struggle for independence, various groups and movements fought against British rule, such as the Indian National Congress, led by figures like Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru, and the Muslim League, led by Muhammad Ali Jinnah. These movements employed various methods of resistance, including non-violent civil disobedience and political agitation. The RSS, as an organization, did not play a prominent role in the Indian independence movement. Its focus remained on promoting its ideology and organizing its members through shakhas (branches) across the country. It is essential to differentiate between the RSS's historical role and the broader Indian independence struggle that involved numerous other organizations and movements working towards the common goal of gaining independence from British rule.
@kris411729 күн бұрын
4:55 Aap Bhole Bharat me Athe hi - about Gandhi; Abhi Bangladesh me Usi Thatah Younus bi Agaya. Similar patterns.
@maheshbayya3092 Жыл бұрын
The Lucknow pact in 1916/7 clearly showed Jinnah's attitude as leader of the muslims.His demand for separate electorates for muslims, which effectively made second class citizens of Hindus in muslim majority areas showed that he always worked for political dominance of muslims.I'm surprised that the congress led by Tilak fell for it.
@sheetaltotochan76042 жыл бұрын
Kyun bolege Pakistani gandhi ke liye bura tabhi toh woh Pakistani hai.
@Vishal-yf5yc2 жыл бұрын
Correct 🤣
@aakanshapriya22952 жыл бұрын
LOT Of things missed out like Mr. Gandhi's views changed about the colonial administration and he started his satyagraha movement in South Africa for the upliftment of Indian community in South Africa for next 15 years. And he became popular in India and INC only after his efforts in Champaran Satyagraha and Kheda Satyagraha bore fruits and helped the local community.
@Gulshan___Kumar2 жыл бұрын
He tried to defame Gandhi ji.. But the world knows who is Gandhi-- The Boss..👍
@gorkhafighter48482 жыл бұрын
@@Gulshan___Kumar 😂😂lol
@sunnymitra63722 жыл бұрын
@@Gulshan___Kumar Gandhi was a Monster. He used little girls for his Sexual Desires........what he was doing in Sabarmati Ashram was absolutely disgusting.........he even slept Naked with his Grand Daughter. If he was alive he would have been in Jail under POSCO Act.
@sachinuprari57992 жыл бұрын
Sad truth ; after 4 or 5 years , everybody is going to forget gandhiji. Political agendss are overshadowing his efforts. Social media and these type of people are the biggest sources.
@crronaldo123 Жыл бұрын
@@sachinuprari5799 hona bhi chahiye
@shripad5156 Жыл бұрын
1. "We won’t be required to sacrifice this colony at least till the year 2050. A few negligible revolutionary incidents may occur due to the agitations launched by Gandhi but nothing more fierce will happen in this country.
@prashanthmguttedar4602 Жыл бұрын
Then why did Subhas Chandra Boseji call Gandhiji a "father of the nation". Rabindranath Tagoreji called him "Mahatma". I think Patel ji, Nehruji, Khan Abdul Ghafar ji, Rajendra Prasad ji and others did not follow Gandhiji throughout their life blindly. A large number of intellectual people present at that time followed Gandhi why were they blind in seeing these facts or not intellect as we. Today's UPSC board's Ethics paper questions are based on Gandhi's thoughts and his principles and this is not a small thing and the UPSC board is not a fool to guide their aspirants in the wrong direction who play a key role in the nation's development. I may not know much about Gandhiji but I think these facts are enough. I think I'm not wrong but if I'm then I'll correct.
@truthtracker554 Жыл бұрын
Because they were not knowing about his past he learned from britishers in south africa how to make people fool.Britishers make him popular intentionally.
@abhinay42002 ай бұрын
Narrative ,did you know that Gandhi was a known racist and called black kafirs ,he also fought for British in South Africa against native Africans
@mustafahussain16382 жыл бұрын
Older jinnah realised while living as a young jinnah that Muslims will Always be sidelined against hindus no matter how bigger the sacrifices they have and would give for India. Aaj current India dekh lain aap, sab aapkai samnai hee hai.
@rahul02572 жыл бұрын
Bhai Pakistan ki izzat pehle sambhalo.
@parth86872 жыл бұрын
3:43 Gandhi never begged to fight, he asked to help the wounded soldiers. How can an Ahimsa pujari ask for arms to fight in the war? Read his autobiography and other works of that time man. Don't spread false information. Ranveer can't expect such content from you.
@Mukulmeena1232 жыл бұрын
Absolutely right.
@shredder2cop Жыл бұрын
Abhijit is a member of the consultative group to the Principal Scientific Adviser to the Government of India.
@xian6232 жыл бұрын
Jinnah also changed his principles after seing violence between hindus and muslims and emergence of hindu mahasabha and it's hate against muslim, he realises Hindus and Muslims can't live with each other in peace after the division done by British and it's agent namely hindu mahasabha and the ideology of sarkaar of raping muslim women in the name of dharma and politics as he mentioned it in his book "siz glorious epoches of indian history",,, After independence several prominent muslim leaders in freedom struggle were removed, don't know why but maybe due to Congress slight deviation to appease the majority and RSS,,,
@Skyyy14362 жыл бұрын
Exactly. I just admire jinnah and allama iqbals version
@abhishalsharma1628 Жыл бұрын
4:48 couldn't it be the strategy of Mr. Gandhi to free India and to get the intel of the British Empire that's why he served for Britishers?
@Officiallyhayat2 жыл бұрын
We Pakistanis don't hate indians. I personally have discussed Gandhi & Nehru in my leadership classes. We have no reason to hate indians or think bad about them. We're neighbors who aren't on talking terms.
@faiezaftab Жыл бұрын
Absolutely right!
@amanchoudhury8135 Жыл бұрын
I guess it's the media in general that make things worse and worse.
@sonusonu-qv4op Жыл бұрын
You have reason to hate which is called "Islam" it's dangerous ideology
@pragasanarchary29802 жыл бұрын
Who knows ,maybe Gandhi was an actor on behalf of british govt, to prevent violent uprising and ensure liberation after India was totally destroyed. It all culminated with the knowledge that there was no benefit for the british to remain in India.
@sufyanarshad5995 Жыл бұрын
*as a Pakistani I don't buy your version of Jinnah getting depressed after Gandhi's arrival in Indian politics *And yes Gandhi did supported caliphate movement but Gandhi and all Hindus betrayed Muslims leaving them alone in this struggle and backing off just to improve Hindus reputation in sights of British government and same happened in 1857 as well
@sanya94522 жыл бұрын
It is very easy sir to find online readings that go against the man who stood for Spirituality and Unity. Jinnah was political and ambitious more than a nationalist and Gandhi was a humanist more than a nationalist and knew that hate against anyone would cause strife and further self sabotage.
@preparation.for.exam.2 жыл бұрын
His logic is false that jinnah was upset because he was sidelined after arrival of gandhiji and therefore joined muslim league because from all known records gandhiji returned in 1915 to india and jinnah had already joined muslim league in 1913
@harishnair42522 жыл бұрын
A man who claims to be an expert on Gandhi and Jinnah surprisingly has no knowledge of what Gandhi did in South Africa. He hilariously refers to Tolstoy farms as some resort run by Gandhiji. Tolstoy farm was his second ashram which served as the headquarter of the Satyagraha movement in the Transvaal region. Also, the Satyagraha movement started after the end of the Boer war. A simple Google search can nail this charlatan's lies.
@bullishboi2 жыл бұрын
@@preparation.for.exam. bot spotted
@theburner2 жыл бұрын
MAHATMA GANDHI ZINDABAD
@theburner2 жыл бұрын
POEM ON GREATNESS OF GANDHIJI kzbin.info/www/bejne/oYTaead6e8aJfdk
@pritamdatta77812 жыл бұрын
Extra knowledge means ( Ranbir Bhai )🌸💕😍
@amananand61612 жыл бұрын
Exactly I thought the same which chavda sir explained about khilafat movement during my school days.
@anonymous_12792 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/eaO8imxvhteWi9U
@pankajshukla94382 жыл бұрын
And your school history teacher didn't explain it to you then....and after that you didn't read any history book....yaha concept clear kar rhe ho ...chiwda historian se 😂...khilafat ka isne bhi galat bataya h ....turkey me Caliphate khtm hone ke bad india me khilafat aandolan start hona btaya h....which is a plain lie....read books instead of listening to these self proclaimed historian...right wing ki hi pdho lekin pdho...ha P.N.Oak types historian ki mat pdhna thoda credible ho unki likhi right left ya centre jiski bhi chiwda knows kitna I don't know...but iska bias bhayankar h
@jewelspearls37522 жыл бұрын
Mahatma Ghandi had many enemys inside and out of India because of the caste system he abolished His enemies in Europe sprung because the British were genius at using the "Pen as a weapon " pay any journalist and it kills anyone faster than a Sword 1*If at all Ghadhiji was a British favoured Indian he will be driving around in a Rolls Royce , invited to every British Function , and would have been titled "SIR Ghandi " 2*Ghandhi was so hated by the British that they employed top journalist to write about him in the worst light 3* They never forgave him for bringing so much scandal and embarrassment to the Monarchy and the British Commonwealth 3*Ghandhi was so educated in laws of the country .rights of humans and he knew they used the caste system as the weapon to destroy India 3* When Ghandhi became peoples leader ,he dared to remain as poor as the masses of that time . 4* No leader could come to this state .He never lived a wealthy life ,he ate food like the common man and dressed like the poorest man 5*Why should he do that as he was a Brilliant lawyer and successful too 6*The British used journalist. and with the powerof the pen KILLED GHANDHI then and these irresponsible wicked biography written by him and against him now surfaces on social media to Rip of a man who died more than a century ago 7 Mahatma Ghandi .Suffered and was tortured in various jails by British for Indians ,Indian rights and Indian assets which was robbed by the British then 8*Its normal for people to fall "HOOK, LINE AND SINKER "for books and articles written by FOREIGNERS centuries ago but its a horrible shame and lack of basic psychological understanding of Human actions to jump into Negative conclusions of anyone for that matter 9* Hitler was the worst enemy of everyone so to fix Ghandhi at that period they pretend he is friend of Hitler and even gets to read a personal letter suposed to be written by Ghandhi to Hitler 10* Child molestation or abuse was a great sin then and now so to cause the scandal Ghandi fixed on the British in India ,they reciprocate with wicked lies in a book supposedly written by him 11* Every useless book on GHANDHI was written by Paid journalist of the British tabloids of that era Ghandhi was too simple and India could not have the paper to write or publish 12*All was published in Britain Indians were happy to use their palm leaves for messaging Fancy. book's, fancy publishers printing all belonged to British 13* Today we know for a fact the ARYAN INVASION . was a farce designed by crooked Authors to give " Intelligence and Superamacy to outsiders not Indians These Authors are being ridiculed and questioned why they distorted Indias History , religious beliefs and allowed European scholars to sponge all the KNOWLEDGE India owned Example Newton is given credit for his Apple theory . on gravity Electricity.magnetism, Surgeries Mathematics .musical notes .astrology ,numerology ,space .vimana, aeroplanes all were researched in India by Indians way before any foreign scholar or scientist 13* There was a need to publicise India and Indians as STUPID AND BACKWARD So the world of Science ,Physics Maths and Biology will never belief it was stolen from India 14* I hope Indians who wish to bulldoze and hammer down India or any Indian leader .Scholar, Freedom Fighter who sacrificed their life in History rethink his or her own mission 15* Be fair as you not only confuse young College Students but educationist too Do a thorough investigation into the era ,the typical stand taken by most countries, the actions and contributions and lifestyle of your subject to arrive at a honest conclusion 17* To recap If whatever said is true about Ghandi ..He would be SIR GHANDI knighted by the King or Queen of England .He would have travelled all around India in Full tuxedo like the Maharajahs and will be seen in a Rolls Royce, living in a home nothing less then a Palace gifted by the British Monarch 18*After Ghandi got independence for India, the British were not allowed to take Indias Textile and natural resources ;gems .literature Books and palm leaves 19* If Ghandiji fits into this Character Assasination FAMOUS writers of India during his time and later would have published the negative Ghandi long before his death ...RamdarSinghDinkar rebellion patriot essaysit Harivansh Rai Bachaan and mother of Amitabh Bachaan was a social activist writer poet Amrita Pritam novelist essayist loved on both sides of India and Pakistan and her books were translated to many foreign languages Suryakant Tripathi Nirala 1896_1961 Essaysit Novelist 20* These writers would have many negative things to write about Ghandi if at all these was genuine material Chinese have a good saying EMPTY "VESSELS MAKE A LOT OF NOISE " Lets be Alert and Proud of India
@Mukulmeena1232 жыл бұрын
These type of so called self proclaimed historians gain knowledge from letters, Wikipedia 😂😂 rip chavda
@ashilyjustin47482 жыл бұрын
@@Mukulmeena123 kya hi kha jae...iss C ko ye nhi pta gandhi ne 25 yrs S africa me or kya kya kia... aparthied ke lie kitna kch kia..Natal indian cogress bnaya...india aakar champaran ..ahemdabad and kheda me participate kia...ek din me nhi popularity gain hui thi.. i really doubt his knowledge
@pritam_chavan1011 ай бұрын
@@ashilyjustin4748ha ha Bhai Maan liya he gave us Freedom by his non violence. Khush 😂
@Tejasisphoenix2 жыл бұрын
There have been extensive research all around the world on gandhis writings and work... Nelson Mandela was inspired by his work... Martin Luther King used his methods to emancipate blacks in USA.... There is a popular saying in political science... If u can't understand Gandhi fault lies within u and not him. ....
@varunkumarvb2 жыл бұрын
We live in a country full of people who hate gandhi
@Tejasisphoenix2 жыл бұрын
@@varunkumarvb no varun... I dt think so... Yes people certainly have difficulties in understanding him... Even I have difficulties ... But the silent majority of india still love Gandhi... Gandhi is not person but an ideology.. It contains the best of indian culture, on which our modern nation the bharat has been establish... Yes people from time time have been trying to malign him... We the silent majority need to be vocal now...
@varunkumarvb2 жыл бұрын
@@Tejasisphoenix Gandhi is of the past..... He will not be our future
@Tejasisphoenix2 жыл бұрын
@@varunkumarvb if Gandhi is not our future then why our pm modi keeps on quoting him ? Why every foreign dignitary, when talks about india , talks about Gandhi... Why every great nation builder may it be mandela Martin Luther King syu kyi take inspiration from him... Gandhi is not a person he is an ideology... I m not saying everything about him is correct.. But make no mistake he represents the best of indian civilization...
@samchao43452 жыл бұрын
@@Tejasisphoenix "If muslims try to destroy and attack Hindus , they should accept it. And offer their life." - Gandhi during Islamic riots of 1940s. Absolutely the "secularism" of Bharat.. preserve this secularism dude. Good for you.
@LuciFer-fb1nj2 жыл бұрын
1:24 definitely shayad bhakti ka prarup hi kuch aisa hai ki insan ke mastishk me duvidhao ka nirman ho hi jata hai.
@Khan_____319-c4k2 ай бұрын
Yas , Ghandi is never teach wrong to us . he is considered as simple, and true man . We Pakistani respect him ❤
@Tejasisphoenix2 жыл бұрын
Ranveer if u would have read the history books then u would have asked him some basic questions... This man calls Gandhi british agent then the very natural q is then why Gandhi devoted his whole life to overthrow british empire in India... During his initial phase Gandhi was very impresses by british polity and culture their sense of justice... Soft power... This phase 1893 to 1906 .. In latter phase of his struggle in South Africa 1906-1914 he understood the real nature of british colonial power and invented new techniques of struggle...
@sonidosepicos2 жыл бұрын
That's why he called indians to fight with British in world war 2
@Tejasisphoenix2 жыл бұрын
@@sonidosepicos yes he called on indian people to fight world War 2 ... But u need to understand the context... Despite of our feelings about british empire... During 1940s british empire was the symbol of democracy liberty equality and justice... These very qualities prevented british empire to use force or violence against non violent satyagrahis... British were fighting the nazis which were autocratic and divisive and extremely violent towards people... Gandhi did not exonarate british of their evil deeds but made a choice between lesser evils
@Tejasisphoenix2 жыл бұрын
Had germans Or Japanese won against british and Americans in second World War then democracy as we know it would have ended in the world... When these powers conquered the nation's they openly imdulged in war crimes like rape violence killings looting burning and so on... When war started Gandhi supported british and asked for freedom... But when british did not respond them he lauched quit india movement... He asked very pointed q... How can u asked us fight for freedom when u r denying that to us... Quit india was the fiercest largest and the most violent of all freedom movement after which british realised that it's no longer easy to rule india....
@Tejasisphoenix2 жыл бұрын
@@pankajshukla9438 dear friend I know... But someone has to speak up... Not out of spite but out of duty... Emotions , anger and impulsivity will always seems attractive than rationality and truth... Let's participate in the discourse without worrying about results
@pankajshukla94382 жыл бұрын
Sir...I guess very less people here, can understand and appreciate these differences. I am writing this to let you know that I am amongst this minority👍🙏
@faiezaftab Жыл бұрын
He is absolutely right and I am happy to listen to this pod cast. Truely I have never ever heard a single bad or even a negative word against Mr. Sri Gandhi sahab in my entire life. Infact we like him for whatever he did for India and its people. And it astonishing that Sri Gandhi sahab is not taught in the books in Pak even then people here respect him alot, not only this we know alot about him like Jinnah. Sri Gandhi was truely a great man!
@A1-Driving974 Жыл бұрын
kzbin.infoUgkxsOXa6PmKQj9KRxhRERUehnP8Q5IVW59U 2 minutes of interesting video
@pritam_chavan1011 ай бұрын
😂 yeah he was great for you. He was villan for us.
@faiezaftab11 ай бұрын
@@pritam_chavan10 wajah bhi to btao na bhai merey?! Puri baat karo.
@faiezaftab11 ай бұрын
@@pritam_chavan10 ek to 11 months pehlay ka comment hai tum 2 din pehlay jawab de rahey ho woh bhi pura nahi. Wajah to batao why mahatma was not a good leader? Masla Gandi g say hai ya mujh say?! Batao sahi say. Bhai you are most welcome.
@rajendraahirwal24692 жыл бұрын
Abhijit sir is having to add "Ji" with Gandhi😂
@pankajshukla94382 жыл бұрын
Ha kyu nhi .....Man who influenced many greats like ML K jr,Tagore, Einstein,Romain Rolland, GBShaw Ho Chi Minh, Nelson Mandela any many more.....only indian to be selected as Time person of the year, runner up in 20th century greatest personality list .....on whose birthday The International Day of Non-Violence is observed need a 'ji' from a third class self proclaimed historian like chiwda poha ...who was ,is and will be nothing in front of Gandhi ... albeit you should show some care and restraint to suffix the word 'sir' ...poha or do kowdi suits better after chiwda
@rajendraahirwal24692 жыл бұрын
@@pankajshukla9438 Gandhi was Madarchod. Don't u know the history? Sala Takla took all credit, as if Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, Bhagat Singh and so many didn't do anything. Can ever non violence establish peace? Never. This man(Sir Abhijit) is telling facts that r available. If Godse Ji earlier had killed Gandhi, then there would not have been any Pakistan, Bangladesh. In the history numerous great people were against Gandhi whether he is Dr Ambedkar, Netaji Chandrshekhar Azad or Bhagat Singh. U tell what he would be doing in Africa for two decads. Keep it in mind Gandhi was, Gandhi is and Gandhi will be Bhen ka Loda. Got it?
@Pillowlips772 жыл бұрын
@@pankajshukla9438 I guess his marketing team was fire
@us-du44fx4u2 жыл бұрын
@@pankajshukla9438 Jab jihadi gardan kaatney aayega ... toh gandhi ki dhoti mein ghusega ya gandhi ki g@nd mein ghusega apni jaan bachane?
@sudhirshukla79442 жыл бұрын
@@pankajshukla9438 Brother Gandhi is a brand which was carefully and deligently made to fool India in perticular and world in general. Biggest fraud of the history. Don't go by big names supporting Gandhi, this was just because of false aura created around Gandhi. Re-read the history books carefully you will find the fault lines.
@huzaifa_ghazikhanana2 ай бұрын
@6:30 this man doesn’t know what he’s talking. Caliphate movement was not in support of Turkey but Ottoman Empire, one of the mightiest empires which continued for about more than 600 years. It’s territory included parts from 3 continents
@akshaynaravane18912 жыл бұрын
A podcast about Nathuram Godse ji and his court trials should also come✌🏻
@shivamvyas83702 жыл бұрын
Reading this book Veer Savarkar the man who could have prevented partition. The many hidden stuff about Gandhi is written there. Unbelievable.
@shripad5156 Жыл бұрын
These are some of the statements by self proclaimed "Veer Savarkar" 1. We must not commit the mistake of assuming that India has become a single united nation. We must accept that there are the two states of ‘Hindus’ and ‘Muslims’ in this huge subcontinent 2. “…that Shivaji accorded as much respect to the daughter-in-law of Kalyan city’s governor by peacefully returning her to the custody of her family is neither an example of idealism, nor worth following. Instead of returning her to her husband and thereby allowing him to increase his own breeding, Shivaji should have snatched her custody and donated her to one of his soldiers to accomplish the growth of our Hindu breeding.” 3. I have no quarrel with Mr Jinnah's two-nation theory. We Hindus are a nation by ourselves and it is a historical fact that Hindus and Muslims are two nations. 4. There are two antagonistic nations living side by side in India. India cannot be assumed today to be a unitarian and homogenous nation. On the contrary, there are two nations in the main: the Hindus and the Muslims, in India.
@shivamvyas8370 Жыл бұрын
@@shripad5156 Pretty sure you're interpretations are wrong and misrepresented but whatever helps you sleep at night. A man with a charkha definitely wasn't the reason we got freedom so that's facts.
@shripad5156 Жыл бұрын
@@shivamvyas8370 bruh, then what are your interpretations
@shripad5156 Жыл бұрын
@@shivamvyas8370 still waiting for your answer??????????
@shivamvyas8370 Жыл бұрын
@@shripad5156 Read the above book I mentioned and clear your doubts.
@sabbiee1002 жыл бұрын
Educate yourself reading books (not necessarily NCERT, rather the books written by all the schools of thought i.e. subaltern, Cambridge, nationalist or Marxist). But read, give efforts. Only then you will know. Please don't resort to Wiki, KZbin or FB for knowledge. It will not only jeopardize your thought process but also of others in your surroundings. Please read.
@dhruvrajnish41212 жыл бұрын
Yep the same British and US media that degraded the translation of our Vedas.
@Mukulmeena1232 жыл бұрын
Absolutely right, now a days people are so much dependent on KZbin, fb, insta, etc.
@abhishekkeshav92342 жыл бұрын
Gandhi became Mahatma even before he entered India. This so called historian comfortably sidelined Gandhiji's contribution to people of South Africa.
@IIXll0llXIl Жыл бұрын
8:53 he was against nationalism or patriotic thinking because this led to us vs. them and individualism. That's why he was against such feelings. He planned to unite just like Khalifa's used to unite muslims and non-muslims, but unfortunately, he failed due to internally western powers capturing the idea of unity. That's why pakistan's idea of khilafat is crashed.
@AliRamzan-p1o5 ай бұрын
We Pakistanis respect MK Gandhi because of his respect towards every religion and his efforts for the freedom. Without his efforts, freedom struggle was incomplete.
@Durvasangram3 ай бұрын
Hahahahahahahahahaja 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@arjunshedge72442 жыл бұрын
Gandhi,nehru were not freedom fighters.. Even if Britishers would'nt have left,kuch farak nahi padta inko...they wanted dominance.. We wanted freedom 🇮🇳
@kritagya.Rajawat2 жыл бұрын
Nehru was the first to ask for poorna swaraj and no british administration and Gandhi was Mahatma and no conspiracy theorist for views can change that . He United Indians from different state , religion, caste , colour who didn't felt same nationalist feelings to unite and stand against colonial power , walked miles in his old age made salt and inspired many to do so and brought british to their knees two times round table conference... Netaji ko unka title dia ... Bhagat singh ne unhe commander kaha apne last letter mai netaji ne unhe father of nation kaha ... Ha Abhijit sir is right he was a british agent ek agent hi aisa kar skte hai india ke liye kyoki real indian toh apne founding fathers ko villain manega na
@surendrapandey96532 жыл бұрын
I started doubting Mr Gandhi when I saw his picture with two girls, which people call shishyas. I taught he had adopted them and they were his duaghters but later I found out it was nothing like that.
@mujtabapervez79862 жыл бұрын
So what was could plz me what gandhi did to the girls?
@imrankh68 Жыл бұрын
@@mujtabapervez7986 He slept naked with them and also made them naked to sleep with him.
@harpran34611 ай бұрын
Amen. He was sleeping naked with girls.
@trideepranjanlahon32902 жыл бұрын
Did he mentioned that Hindu mahasabha had allianced with Muslim league...he will never tell.... chronology samjiye
@DrsaiKamalofficial6 ай бұрын
He understood the Indian pulse very well... Simultaneously his thoughts of peace were good but whether relevant or not is a matter of debate.
@YonkoAkagamiShanks Жыл бұрын
Jo log Gandhi ko Subash Chandra Bose sey zyada maante hain. Please watch Tashkent Files and then read the chapter "A Special Relationship with India" from the book "Mitrokhin Archives 2". Gandhi Supremacy k kaale chitthay ka chota sa hisa padne ko mil jayega. Aur isiliye woh Book aur woh Chapter hamare education system sey delete kar diya tha isiliye humko ye saab history mein nahi padaya gaya. From that movie onwards, 2nd of October is only Lal Bahadur Shastri Ji's Birthday for me because he was the real patriot for which he got killed. 💯
@PrajwalNanaiah2 жыл бұрын
Gandhiji is mahatama. Don't analysis unless u personally read his books. He showed non violence to the world. Before 19th century all empires was established by blood and war. Gandhiji is showed satyagraha power to the world.
@jithinnair35242 жыл бұрын
Bhai Prajwal read Gandhis Experiment with Truth . Tumhe pata chal jayega vo kitne bade Mahatma the. Gandhi not just weakened us socially but also he weakened us mentally . This is not land of Gandhi , Nehru this the land of shivaji maharaj , raj rajendra chola , subash chandra bose , sardar patel and Vishnugupta Chanakya
@shubhampandi95612 жыл бұрын
Buddhe jake sandaas saaf kar
@kritagya.Rajawat2 жыл бұрын
@@jithinnair3524 Gandhi was Mahatma and no conspiracy theorist for views can change that . He United Indians from different state , religion, caste , colour who didn't felt same nationalist feelings to unite and stand against colonial power , walked miles in his old age made salt and inspired many to do so and brought british to their knees two times round table conference... Netaji ko unka title dia ... Bhagat singh ne unhe commander kaha apne last letter mai netaji ne unhe father of nation kaha ... Ha Abhijit sir is right he was a british agent ek agent hi aisa kar skte hai india ke liye kyoki real indian toh apne founding fathers ko villain manega na
@rajarshighosh4821 Жыл бұрын
Non-violence se ghanta kuch Ukhada. Fabricated history me ek politician ko freedom fighter bana Diya. He was a British agent. Isliye he features so prominently in the British-engineered Indian history.
@switabhshrivastava1822 жыл бұрын
Factually he is very wrong. Ganhi travelled whole India for 2 years then launched Champaran Satyagrah and then he became famous because of success of satyagrah . Yes Jinnah was a secular and natioanlist man before 1930 but in 1930s he became biagot because to gane power first in provincial election of 1937 and than call for Pakistan in 1940. And many people dont hate Gandhi and hate Jinnah because it was Jinaah who called for violance for a seperate nation, the Direct Action Day in 1946, so at one side is a man who called for non violence and another side who called for violence.
@johnmiller6991 Жыл бұрын
Gandhi was a great leader ,huge respect from Pakistan ❤️
@faiezaftab Жыл бұрын
Yes
@syedshariq8486 Жыл бұрын
New generation of india don't like him This is the impact of hindu nationalists on new india
@faiezaftab Жыл бұрын
@@syedshariq8486 yeah it is. Big time. Sirf keh deney say kuch nahi hota sab say uper India. Dharam say bhi uper. Nazar bhi ana chahiye. Dharam hinduata hi reh gya hai that's all. He was a great leader. Zaruri nahi ap ki choices sub ko passand hon. Os waqt kya halat they he did what he could best. Not to his best abilities! He really did the best he could! Na sirf apnay logon kay lye bhi balay other countries kay people kay lye bhi wohi socha jo wahan kay people kay lye best tha! Proper History ota kay dekh lena chahiye pehlay! Ek united india is ko na chorna was one of his greatest steps! Mein india say nahi hun par Sri Gandhi sahab ka buhat bada FAN hun!
@syedshariq8486 Жыл бұрын
@@faiezaftab bhai muje pata hai uska badiya contribution raha hai laikin 2014 me BJP ka power me ane k baad halat badle hai Hindu nationalists ne apna narrative kafi fehlaya hai wo log Anti gandhi Anti Nehru hai ye log Gandhi k qatil nathuram godse ko apna hero mante hai unfortunately
@faiezaftab Жыл бұрын
@@syedshariq8486 that is bad. Should'nt happen. Yes. Hum bhi suntay rehtey hain. Not good. To India to ab secular nahi raha.
@iftikaralam1oOne2 жыл бұрын
Very interesting... Jai Hind 🇮🇳
@NaeemKhanRana3 ай бұрын
India m bhi kuch log sach bol sktay hain... glad to know
@shiveshtuli98302 жыл бұрын
Okay so, which one of you is a historian, and can prove what your saying is true? you are saying that what we study in our textbooks might be wrong, but are just supposed to believe what 2 people with no proper research(by which i mean a 4-5 year PhD), over the qualified professors who write the NCERT and other board textbooks
@thephenominalbeast71062 жыл бұрын
gandhi inside is like "hail hydra"
@bro53842 жыл бұрын
The word Khalifa from sir abhijits mouth just made me smile for a sec😂
@rekharao13582 жыл бұрын
very enlightening talks . thank you very much.
@realazeem47 Жыл бұрын
Much Respect From Pakistan 💯
@2ndheirofkyuogama642 жыл бұрын
None of the movement of Gandhian era got successful, he bought calamity by applying double standards of ahmisha and brotherhood to Hindu community. It was thousands of unsung indians who devoted their blood we are breathing in free India
@sanket_potbhare2 жыл бұрын
Dr Ambedkar never called gandhi as 'mahamata' but called Mr. gandhi
@muhammadmushtaq9065 Жыл бұрын
As a Pakistani i appreciate the non biased views about jinnah. And im surprised to know this side of Gandhi because in our textbooks he's a freedom fighter for his respective nation and he was murdered fighting till his last moment for his people 😮
@areebasyed2469 Жыл бұрын
I can't believe he passed away a year after the partition. Really sad!!!
@cruxofcode73529 ай бұрын
Self proclaimed historian 😅 Gyan full on
@learnenglishwithhamid9 ай бұрын
Shallow analysis!
@debasmithmohanty25382 жыл бұрын
These are not unknown these are untold.
@het66182 жыл бұрын
Textbooks always say that we got independence because of the peaceful protest organised by Gandhi lol seriously British those people purposely created a made man famine in Bengal because of which millions of people died & they didn't care and when they were asked about it they said why didn't Gandhi died & also said that don't worry Indians breeds like rabbits. Those are the same people who did jalianwala bhag massacre and yet Gandhi wanted to gain independence by peace. This shows how cruel they were. Do you really think that they cared about Gandhi going on strike? Do they left India thier looting spot just because Gandhi said them to do so peacefully? No we got independence by blood not by some kind of peaceful protest. Many legends have scarified their lives to gain independence and yet we are still thanking this idiot gandhi for our freedom. Even small kids also had scarified thier lives but sadly we don't remember them now also.
@ameynimbalkar8812 жыл бұрын
Well by this logic hitler is no 1 freedom fighter of india he went to war with Britain made them bank corrupt because of which they could not keep control over there colonies even he died in this process so why don't you say hitler got india independence