Unreal Engine 5 or real life? Is it nature or Nanite!?

[@joshuanaylor3416]

Now gamers can touch grass inside

[@Thor_Artur]

Lmao 😂

[@deson_83]

​@@Thor_Artur 💀☠

[@DixieCrusader-X-]

😂😭😂😭

[@2famous-]

lmaooo

[@ultimate_Fire_God]

Lol

[@asandax6]

Everyone: debating whether it's real or not. Mean while I'm stuck watching a 144p video because KZbin never thought of adding quality settings for shorts.

[@mnomadvfx]

Or a volume control for that matter. Or something to stop it automatically starting while you are doing something in another frickin browser tab 😱 Seriously it's a total mess. Why Google, just why?

[@divyanshumvp6817]

me to🥲

[@wildkeith]

The algorithm for shorts is the worst

[@kurogotbeats]

@@mnomadvfx also autoplay

[@freezy5524]

You gotta adjust the quality of a normal video and then it will also apply on short's quality

[@larion2336]

This is definitely real footage. No one has done plants like that, the colors are perfect and the sound is also clearly real.

[@SteveSmith-ze5mw]

wrong

[@SteveSmith-ze5mw]

wrong

[@larion2336]

@@SteveSmith-ze5mw strong argument.

[@virtua7390]

@@larion2336think about the water as well. Also part of my argument is a lot of realistic unreal engine is from a first person or 3rd person view where your not actually up close to foliage. Yes, people have made renders similarly realistic but that’s usually in a movie with groups of trained professionals not just a nobody taking random videos and posting them online

[@easydrive2236]

Its unreal. You can tell by how static everything is apart from the two items in main focus

[@DixieCrusader-X-]

Instead of everyone ripping each other's throats out over if it's real or not, let's just appreciate that we can even compare reality with engine graphics!

[@C.Church]

I did no such thing. Speak for yourself, rude bossy pants.

[@DixieCrusader-X-]

@@C.Church Why don't you go read the rest of the comments on this video, there's a reason the OP slapped a heart on my comment.

[@brainxd]

@@DixieCrusader-X- Honestly I don't know if using the term "appreciate" is correct. Shit's scary.

[@DixieCrusader-X-]

@@brainxd It is. But I was trying to give people a reason to stop fighting

[@Prince_Dracula]

@@DixieCrusader-X- you’re saying this is unreal engine 5? Damn. I’m getting old already and I’m only 19. This technology is advancing too fast. These niggas need to slow down. we JUST got new gen, not they already have indistinguishable foilage? Damn

[@furkangormus3920]

this is real footage . ( edit : I know more or less about this job and as soon as camera focused on the tree, I easily realized that it was taken with a phone. )

[@LLOYD3D]

no man, this is Unreal Engine 5.1! Welcome in the future!

[@annualleopard3063]

​@@LLOYD3D bro stop actively spreading misinformation. Just because you want it to be Unreal Engine, doesn't mean it is. UE5 isn't quite there yet and won't be for a while.

[@LLOYD3D]

@@annualleopard3063 i use unreal Engine by few years, and trust me dude! ;) , and i'm not a kid, i've 40 y.o. with more 20 years of 3d skill. See you.

[@annualleopard3063]

@@LLOYD3D lol then it's even more embarrassing that you can't tell it's real footage

[@itscorn3124]

The water is too real

[@MRDRAGONFRUIT]

It’s so real I even heard someone saying “banana” in the background💀

[@swastiksharma4283]

Just noticed after reading your comment XD

[@nonsuspiciouscolour]

The foliage in the distance looks like something straight outta UE5. I'll say this is real footage on the closeups then slowly transforms to UE5 footage.

[@therunawaykid6523]

So they are doing a matrix reawakens 😏😏

[@nonsuspiciouscolour]

@@therunawaykid6523 matrix reawakens is 100% done in ue5 there is no real videography,

[@therunawaykid6523]

@@nonsuspiciouscolour I’m pretty sure it switches between the two showing how realistic the graphics can be on unreal - at least going by jacksepticeyes play though - sadly I missed out on playing it myself on Xbox one s ☹️☹️

[@nonsuspiciouscolour]

@@therunawaykid6523 ahh i see. yes, those parts were real. but those were only for the intro. some parts of it like when they are in that white void is real video.

[@therunawaykid6523]

@@nonsuspiciouscolour yes I see, the graphics in game looked absolutely phenomenal, shows what is possible in unreal engine 5 I really hope we actually get a full matrix game using that engine

[@rafox66]

I can tell right away that it's real by looking at the plant up close, especially the details and the way the leaves move. Honestly there's not much else that I can judge it on anymore, unreal 5 is absolutely amazing.

[@21EC]

The only real thing is the closeby plant that is seen on the beginning that is close to the camera, the rest is not real (UE5)

[@aidanzipzap]

Look at the camera movement

[@ege.the.engineer]

@@aidanzipzap you can extract camera movements from any footage using simple tools and import those movements into 3d softwares such as ue, b3d, c4d etc

[@gamesrule8519]

@@21EC I was mostly focusing on the small dirt caught up in the plant and small particles clinging to the plant stem.

[@jakestarr4718]

@@21EC its all real, light absorption is not the same as glossy reflection for depth

[@freshlyfishedbread5567]

Real life then transitions to UE5 after passing the tree

[@RealEllenDeGeneres]

I think this too. They're using real footage for the close shot and water, which gets your mind thinking it's real, then wipe into UE5, where it's actually just showing an easier scene to make look real. The vegetation is more in the distance and the camera is in motion at this point, so it's difficult to even to focus on the details with the motion blur.

[@liam4184]

That makes sense. The first part looks too real, but the passing tree and the rest seem more cg

[@YEAHSURETHINGMAN]

Bingo

[@topraktunca1829]

Yes

[@andreasgross4207]

and what? they constructat the hole scene in UE5? Don't you think this is to much work for a 5s Video?

[@Arthr0]

Once you see the hairs of the leaves, this is real

[@SteveSmith-ze5mw]

Little hairs on the leaves are easily textured.

[@Arthr0]

​@@SteveSmith-ze5mw they cannot be textured like this. You need hair particles

[@SteveSmith-ze5mw]

@@Arthr0 Point being it can be done.

[@Dutch_Vander_Linde_]

@@Arthr0It can be done, search gaussian splatting.

[@ChillieGaming]

​@@Dutch_Vander_Linde_rip GPU if u think current gen games will have those hair particles on the foliage.

[@virtua7390]

You would have to convince me this man went through all the trouble learning multiple modeling, texturing, and rendering softwares, baked the water with probably at least a million polygons, hand crafted all the foliage, hand crafted the trees, then made one of the most natural lighting, which 99% probably couldn’t achieve, probably ever seen in ue5. Most of y’all probably looked up some random “realistic ue5 videos” and said this fake, yet probably none of y’all actually did your research, and probably none of y’all actually fully used ue5. On top of that you would have had to put in more detail than most of the actual videos y’all seen online to make this level of realism. None of y’all realize the actual complexity that is in this and assume that this looks off because it wasn’t taken with a $2,000 camera, and y’all never actually went outside. One of the biggest things that y’all are probably overestimating is Nanite since it doesn’t work how you actually imagine, and the foliage isn’t some Nanite upscale downscale crap that looks fully detailed at all time and super up close. Something like this would take rendering and not a real time render.

[@xAmok]

I can tell that nobody likes you and you live a sad life🤗

[@jebbroham1776]

it's pretty scary when we have an actual heated debate going on in the comments section below about whether this is real or not like we're to the point we just can't tell anymore. Have we reached that point already?

[@haruyanto8085]

No we havent, its just people are still stupid

[@criert135]

Pretty much. I do think this video is real life but there are other videos on KZbin that are from Unreal 5 and look absolutely photorealistic.

[@deepwaters2334]

Video evidence is no longer satisfactory

[@Dutch_Vander_Linde_]

Scary? You are scared by this? Damn

[@sunbear9374]

@@Dutch_Vander_Linde_if you're not yet you will be one day. The implications of what you could do with this tech gives me the same feeling deep fakes do as they continue to improve.

[@laynaTheLobster]

It's both: the foliage in the beginning is highly detailed and also realistically moving in the wind, something which would be nearly impossible to pull off, especially when 5.2 is still so new. After we transition through that tree though, the camera movement becomes a lot smoother and the foliage goes a lot farther away, clearly indicating that we have transitioned to a render.

[@daniken2707]

Nope, this video is factually fully real footage

[@laynaTheLobster]

@@daniken2707 Says... a random guy on the Internet 😂

[@daniken2707]

@@laynaTheLobster i work with unreal engine and know what's possible.

[@laynaTheLobster]

@@daniken2707 "Work with Unreal Engine" can mean you're the director of technology at Epic Games or you're some 15 year old who followed a Brackey's tutorial by the letter and now you think you're big shit because you know how to follow spoon-fed instructions. I'm a student of computer simulation and engineering going into my third year. I built my own graphics framework using Direct3D11 and C++. In the past, I used Unity to build more than a handful of smaller games, some for game jams, others for personal projects over the summer in between school years. I'm working on a much larger game right now that'll take at least 10 months of concentrated effort for the game to be completed. In my free time I look up any and all graphics techniques I can think of, just out of sheer curiosity. I've made my own cell shader for fun. *I* know what's possible.

[@Dutch_Vander_Linde_]

@@laynaTheLobsterNone of you have any factual proof.

[@boedilllard5952]

Definitely starts real life but then it seems they use filters or out of focus so it look bad like UR 5.

[@Miatpi]

Real life. The details of the leaf, the small movements of the leafs and the waters interaction with the stones in the river and just the overall look of the lighting is just too perfect.

[@Donuts_Donuts_Donuts]

@@tarjeihs it is real life

[@SteveSmith-ze5mw]

wrong

[@daniken2707]

​@@SteveSmith-ze5mwyou're wrong, and overestimating the current realism of unreal engine 5, sure it is highly realistic and could fool quite some people, but i work with UE5 and have done so for the past 3.5 years or so. This realism is not yet possible but it's close.

[@SteveSmith-ze5mw]

wrong@@daniken2707

[@schmoborama]

@@daniken2707 the video wipes to ue5 as the camera pans past a tree. It's a bait & switch, pretty dishonest when it claims that it's one or the other.

[@k29king1]

It’s unreal engine. It’s easy to tell because the “uncanny valley” doesn’t just effect facial and body animations, it affects actual movements too such as camera movements. If you know you know. It’s UE5.

[@workingshiftkeykeyboard200]

As if he would go outside

[@dankpotato9578]

Lmaoooo

[@ARTala88]

Haha i think he is a real nerd or Unreal nerd

[@MsBrookeWilcox]

Man graphics now are so incredible. I never would have imagined seeing the texture of a leaf so clearly. It's very impressive.

[@amjj8218]

I hope this is a joke

[@Dutch_Vander_Linde_]

@@amjj8218”i hOpE ThIs iS a JoKe!!1!1” -🤡

[@SteveSmith-ze5mw]

it's not, this is fucking unreal engine. Y'all are fucking dense@@amjj8218

[@schmoborama]

it's a lie ; the closeup stuff is real, it wipes to ue5 later. So it's both, but tries to trick you by showing the real part first.

[@petergriffin383]

When you have people arguing whether its real or now... that's a win.

[@kjungst]

people took a scene from GTA V as real, people are not wise.

[@schmoborama]

Not when you have to use a bait & switch, using real footage to trick ppl, and then lie in the title.

[@florentraffray1073]

there's some detail int he plant and its movement at the beginning that look very real, it seems like you can kind of make out little fuzzy bits on the leave even. Of course part of the reason it's tricky is the horrible compresion but if I had to guess I'd say real.

[@huevosyitz]

the change in ISO when it panned to the right gave it away.

[@feerfree8986]

Have to break it to you but this one is real xD, nice camera though, where is this? The vast open field looks very pretty

[@cinemaphar]

@Daycee 🎗️ actually as someone stated, it’s both

[@zackery5678]

@Daycee 🎗️ you can hear a person speaking in the back, its definitely real

[@feerfree8986]

@Daycee 🎗️ I don't think anyone would go so far as to put displacement map for a plant, the background? maybe, but the plan in the first few second definitely not real. UE5 doesn't mean good graphic

[@SteveSmith-ze5mw]

@@zackery5678 Wtf does that mean? I can overlay an audio track of someone talking.

[@-removed]

I think it’s a game from the fact that things seem just a tiny bit off, or fuzzy, but either way it’s amazing that you can do this, and it’s actually possible for it to be compared, and not be completely sure about your answer, and if I’m right, these graphics are breathtaking.

[@leonardocarolo6961]

I feel like its too hyperreal but yeah the fact that there has to be a discussion speaks for itself

[@Swagster23we55]

If only ue5 looked like this

[@SteveSmith-ze5mw]

It does. This is it.

[@schmoborama]

@@SteveSmith-ze5mw bullshit it's real until the 2nd half of the video, then it's ue5. A dishonest bait & switch.

[@hhehe4159]

@@SteveSmith-ze5mw no

[@triocion]

at the beginning it looked quite real, but then the first tree ruined it

[@ferozhossain3401]

This is real

[@triocion]

@@ferozhossain3401 naaah look at the trees

[@ferozhossain3401]

@@triocion I did...and they are fine. Look at the moss, and the grass flutter. And the ripples on the stream. We are not there yet in terms of CG. Let alone real time.

[@triocion]

@@ferozhossain3401 That's the point. It just want to bait u on thegrass

[@ferozhossain3401]

Again, this would be production level render. To do this in unreal, that too procedurally, with such small fluttering leaf animations, would be to prove that studios like ILM and MPC are obsolete. We are not there yet buddy. So nope.

[@msterofficial]

It's pretty easy imo to spot that it's real. The lightning combined with the focus from the camera lens is what makes it obvious. If you also look on the foliage in the beginning of the video you can see the little fuzz of hair on it, it's something that isn't taking into account in ue since it would take up unnecessarily large amounts of prosessing power for accurate and small details like that which normally go unnoticed.

[@Blue_gamin]

for one frame you can see a realestic arm so real

[@fictionalaudio]

Unreal ❌ Real ✅

[@dakshkaushik7]

From the sky, i m guessing it's unreal engine 5 Also from the tree

[@SteveSmith-ze5mw]

correct

[@virtua7390]

You’re talking about someone making a scene higher quality than most aaa companies can do. This isn’t even possible in unreal. Unreal wasn’t made for this actual level of detail. You’ve probably never even fully experienced unreal engine 5. The trees themselves are too realistic and would likely have to be rendered in an alternate program. The foliage is way, way to realistic for unreal engine 5. Something like this would likely take a month to render even if it was ue5. You think of unreal engine as an engine with no limit to realism which is completely wrong. That’s why most things aren’t rendered up close. The topology on some of these objects would have to be hand modeled and not an asset available to just download anywhere.

[@hyperblox77]

Bro no way this is a game this legit looks like real life

[@incredifall]

Didn't see a single insect. Must be real.

[@Clawstorm]

I am not going to lie guys, some of these answers are WILD 😂

[@SteveSmith-ze5mw]

These people are fucking dense

[@QuakeProBro]

You can clearly tell from the thumbnail alone, yet people fall for it. I love how everyone is trying explain how this has to be unreal in some way lmao Seems like you only need to sprinkle a little Nanite or Lumen in your comment to become an industry veteran and unreal engine expert lol Thank you for posting this, these comments are hilarious 😂

[@jakestarr4718]

@@QuakeProBro the light absorption bro, its real... no fake ass gloss

[@hypernight4001]

So is it real or not, one year passed give us the answer before third world war

[@sidesw1pe]

I don’t know if it’s real or not, but what would be the point of a video like this if it weren’t rendered? I mean isn’t the point to show us how good rendering has become?

[@Clawstorm]

Or show off some beautiful nature! The line is getting really thin

[@sidesw1pe]

@@Clawstorm The title of the video would suggest the point wasn't to show off some beautiful nature :-) And yes the line is very thin, from this video the initial shot of the plant was indistinguishable from real life, and the water seemed very realistic, while the rest of it looked rendered very close to reality.

[@virtua7390]

The biggest give away is the dirt applied to the base of the foliage and fuzz which is on it. You would have to convince me that a single creator could do better than full professionally trained companies. The level of detail would have had to be done by a professional, who created and gathered their own assets. This might come as a surprise to some of you, but unreal engine 5 isn’t photo realistic up close.

[@MilkyGames17]

I think it could be unreal because of how bright the envirnment is, this could be many factures tho

[@IM2awsme]

Bit rate on my phone is making this an impossible challenge for me 🤣 but I'ma say unreal because a couple of those assets are actually free to use.

[@virtua7390]

Those assets are inspired by real life objects and actual scanned assets of real life objects

[@21EC]

Im pretty sure the close initial plant is real that was added onto the video from UE5 ...so the rest is not real and the only real thing is the closeby plant that is seen on the beginning..nice edit tho

[@Swjatoslav]

Plot twist: its both, its outside but with extended shaders in vr and stuff like this

[@Richardcec]

The lighting and movement on the foreground tree gives it away as UE5

[@virtua7390]

You should try going outside

[@okaybutwhythough7456]

Real life. Nanite can't do dynamic foliage that well. And really most wind simulations for foliage in games don't cut it. The available fluid simulations for water look more like sludge, and it's too three dimensional to be a simple faking method.

[@LLOYD3D]

Check this out. kzbin.info/www/bejne/l6q4pnSmgNqUsJo

[@okaybutwhythough7456]

@@LLOYD3D impressively natural looking but still lacks granularity. Some foam and a bigger use of particles could definitely help, but I still think it looks like sludge when compared to actual water. Ideally you'd have the simulation running in real time, but we're still a long way from that becoming standard.

[@IamSH1VA]

Seems real & I wanna go there…beautiful 😌

[@truegamer2819]

this is for sure Unreal engine but man its hard to tell by the looks of it ya eyes can be deceived if you think this is real life but then again its very hard to tell, what amazing job you've done, i can already tell you put alot of effort time into this project great work friend 😎👍

[@Parabellum-X]

At first, I was going to say 'Unreal', until I started paying attention to the background noise. The sound of heavy machinery can be heard some short distance away.

[@vocalsync135]

Unreal Engine 5 is impressive but Real Nature is much more impressive.

[@danielwilkie2664]

Looks real

[@klawrencekiewhuo3811]

My thoughts are, they first 3-4 seconds of the clip was captured on real time on real vegetation and after that the video has been switched to A.I generated vegetation.

[@BeforeThisNovember]

The first plant looks real, then the rest looks fake 😅

[@Kaiess_01]

all these professionals in the comments and still no one can agree on if its real or not lmao

[@SteveSmith-ze5mw]

it's not. It's obvious, these people are garden variety reterds.

[@realduck]

this IS real life. There's no other way. UE5 hasn't advanced THIS far yet.

[@andrew-song]

Don't know how you're comment doesn't have more likes. Unreal is quite good, but it can't simulate water rippling and wind coherence quite like what was shown.

[@realduck]

@@andrew-song Exactly!

[@richardjubb192]

That's unreal 5

[@realduck]

@@richardjubb192 nahhh bro try using UE and going outside you will see a difference

[@richardjubb192]

@@realduck have you not seen what they have done that is ue5

[@virtua7390]

The amount of absolute perfection in this is highly unlikely to be fake, level of detail like this would cost thousands of dollars maybe even a million. This is level of perfection that doesn’t even exist in games and would normally take an entire group of trained professionals. Not to say people haven’t made super realistic renders but this is almost if not perfect. Also another thing, the water is a whole other story, that is way, way to good to just be a random thing someone made online, I’m talking tech not seen in video games before. Yes people have made extremely realistic water in games and renders but extremely rare for it to be this good, even in movies.

[@Ziru0Gaming]

It’s like that one game people thought was real bodycam footage and the dev had to make a video about how it’s UE5

[@2_-]

It's real life look at the background details

[@UrbexLiving]

UE5 can do that now. doesn’t have billboard textures

[@LLOYD3D]

Nope , this is Unreal Engine!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@FairPLAYER]

Ue 5 can render 80millions km s now in real time without loss of performance.. so you can guess about the view distance and details

[@SteveSmith-ze5mw]

wrong

[@Archilives_UE5_Ai]

The leaves fluttered slightly with the water, both the patches of dust on the trees and the gentle light through the trunk. let's Stop trolling people with real footage

[@SteveSmith-ze5mw]

incorrect

[@implodingllama2092]

@@SteveSmith-ze5mwgo take a walk outside, you’re under every comment saying the same thing, when ironically you’re the one that’s wrong

[@SteveSmith-ze5mw]

and I'll keep saying the same thing. Unironically because I'm right.@@implodingllama2092

[@Sickanimation862]

Grass real, but background is unreal

[@caliefgamer]

Between this and the VR suits we're getting closer and closer to ready player one

[@KomodozGaming]

This is 100% real life footage

[@SteveSmith-ze5mw]

wrong

[@schmoborama]

the first half is real, it's a bait & switch - once you think it's real, they swap it for ue5 - watch for it to wipe with the camera going by the tree

[@MrQhuin]

I like how we can't be 100% if this is real or not.

[@titansoundsmusic]

The day they release a procedurally generated world with graphics like this, and relative minecraft mechanics is the day I sign a loan for an omnidirectional treadmill and top of the line vr gear

[@Clawstorm]

If you watch the unreal engine 5.2 development video, you’ll see that they actually have procedurally generated environments near this level in engine. For now it’ll be used for dev but the tech exists!

[@AlmondChocolateMilk]

I knew Unreal would never have that type of fluid surface simulation (yet) but the second clip is unreal

[@Negative-3000]

It's real life obviously, the inconsistent camera movement means somebody's holding it.

[@SteveSmith-ze5mw]

you can easily animate the shake

[@FairPLAYER]

Said by someone who has never known about animating cameras

[@Tom-hw4bt]

No matter whether this footage is real or not, it has proven that the engine is that good, that no one can decide whether a video is real or not.

[@jackhughes7637]

It's definitely not real, but the first couple seconds got me

[@borat_sagdiev1]

Съемка кажется реальной, пока не начинается движение камеры

[@TheGuitarnob]

First plant is real. But the far is unreal

[@LLOYD3D]

you know about 3d scanner?

[@kieranofblackwood7951]

It's Unreal. Notice how the nearest tree trunk seems off when the camera passes over it.

[@freshlyfishedbread5567]

maybe the tree trunk is used to transition from a real life shot to UE5. the water looks way too good for ue5 but after the camera passes the tree the whole scene looks a little off

[@annualleopard3063]

No guys it 100% real. No transitions. Unreal is extremely detailed but it's no where close to real life to the trained eye. Remember, just because you hope it's UE5, doesn't mean it is! Don't worry though we'll get there one day!

[@thebestgamer5248]

@@annualleopard3063 have you not seen the matrix demo or train station.

[@thebestgamer5248]

@@freshlyfishedbread5567 Simulated water physics have existed for years. Is it just now surprising to you.

[@GoldenMoments100]

that's a normal birch tree trunk.

[@Pl-listh]

What incredible quality, I hope I live long enough for games to evolve this way and who knows how to play!

[@omgtherenonames69]

i thought it was real at first

[@TheOriginalDogass]

As someone who goes outside once a month I can tell you that this is definitely real life

[@SteveSmith-ze5mw]

wrong

[@FinalFeather]

no matter how much realistic games they make it never beats the true beauty of nature

[@venkatasivavarmasirivuri231]

Unreal engine one 👏 great work bro

[@SamuraiInu]

This is definitely Unreal Engine 5. The water flow in the river is a dead giveaway. A real river would have a mix of calm and turbulent areas, but this one has the same water animation throughout. The Ambient Occlusion in the background also looks very similar to UE5.

[@williandias9035]

it's UE5... why am I so sure?... I'll explain: anyone with a certain amount of experience in the woods, trails, camping, who would survive in the jungle knows that every stream in nature has a sense of affluence...In this case, the stream should be flowing forward, in the lowest part of the scene, what is upside down here, for this reason the scene is artificial

[@AbdullahArif0999]

Thats Unreal Engine 5

[@youtrovert]

That burning sound is coming from the PC

[@cinnamondum]

It's freaking amazing we are even contemplating at all if this is real or fake!

[@starduck2]

This is real, no doubt in my soul.

[@joshuadelaughter7968]

I think it's real. If not, whoever did the camera movement did a phenomenal job of making it very realistic. Usually the biggest giveaway that it isn't real is that the camera movement is a little unnatural.

[@Mettlehead222]

Definitely real, there are certain elements in the environment that are extremely difficult to replicate in unreal engine, namely to do with the river and the ground and foliage. One of the dead give aways is the sound, you can hear machinery in the distance and this is usually something neglected or left out by level developers and even when they do put it in, it's very very hard to get it just right, its a mix of sound coming from almost all directions and attenuation for that can be really really difficult to configure right.

[@dragossorin85]

Mapping real video in order to reproduce the assets would be a great tool for creating games

[@skunkwar7468]

I think it’s real but I also think that someone with talent could recreate this in unreal engine 5.1 and be real close to looking the same. You won’t see it in a game because devs have to create stuff that is toned down so people who have weaker systems can hit a certain fps

[@Mint474]

I feel like jumping into there and chilling in the lake

[@ian4846]

The foreground looks real but the background looks like ue5

[@vlav1102]

Конечно же это реальность: движение камеры, шумы, голос за кадром, листва в начале кадра - unreal engine до такого качества и детализации ещё не добрался

[@space_1073]

The phone camera emulation would be the most impressive part of this if it's fake. But for that reason I'm pretty sure this is real life.

[@jessiepena9713]

Looks real in some parts but the moss on the tree looks a little off, the video isn't high quality, but to me it's what sticks out a bit

[@kaiooo-_-1383]

Like bro, imagine in 5 years when games will actually look like this

[@Dlpfan1985]

That's some real time graphics right there

[@noahzoic4762]

The amount of detail on the close up makes me think it’s real. Although there’s something about the movement when the camera starts moving seems just off as well as the surroundings.

[@_Chessa_]

This is not unreal engine 5. Pretty spot on with the camera here and how creators in the assets tend to go heavy on one particular plant species when making wild environments. Which is true for nature in how ferns tend to spread out. Great spot to film and trick us. The sun lighting bounce on plants that leaves “different shades of color” and the deeper shadows are what’s missing in unreal engine 5.

[@simpilot001]

The foreground is mostly real. You can barely see some small jitters in the few trees between the fore and back ground. Not to mention if you pause with that tree is passed in the middle, I can personally see a color difference in the two. Just my 2 cents

[@SomberAmity]

This is definitely both. Close up especially with water is real. But everything in the distance looks like a generated scene in UE5

[@user-ys9dl3rd9o]

Plus it also depends of pov game luke matrix and unrecord are bringing camera pov thats why they look so real

[@nothingyetyet]

My brain going crazy😂

[@charlie.on.youtube]

As a person who loves Spaghetti-Os, I can say with all certainty that this is a KZbin video.

[@sethmayo]

The water simulation is too perfect. This is real

[@kebabfoto]

Now it's so good we actually can't tell the difference. That is crazy

[@RichardSteelUK]

The sheer volume of dense people here is absolutely staggering. I am genuinely shocked.

[@supersammy149]

This is real footage. As realistic as it may be, even Unreal can't do this.

[@justin2308]

I have never seen water move like that UE5, so it’s gotta be real.