They fire up the port engines first, and then the starboard engines. This aircraft has eight bladed props. I love the sound that the props make over the whine of the engines. That's what I love most about turboprops. In high idle and taxiing, the props make your basic "Box Fan" sound. In takeoff and inflight, they make the "Bumblebee" sound. The 60 cycle flicker of the TV or computer screen, creates optical illusions of the props spinning slower, or backwards. I notice that the props of this aircraft rotate to port. On the turboprops that I've flown on, including the DeHaviland Dash-8, the props rotate to starboard.
@Sam-lw6mx5 жыл бұрын
Very proud to be part of the a400 developer team
@mobius-15035 жыл бұрын
How the hell does this massive sky whale fly like an acrobat
@Sam-lw6mx5 жыл бұрын
@@mobius-1503 it is the newly designed engine
@robertkerr33128 жыл бұрын
A very impressive aeroplane and something Australia should consider for future RAAF purchases.
@EpicWaterDrop8 жыл бұрын
+Robert Kerr I doubt the RAAF would use one, even though this is my favorite Military transport plane and I would love my country to have them. They use the C-17 Globe Master. But maybe some day they might which would be awesome!
@MARINECORPS619921138 жыл бұрын
+Timi its the same plane different engines and nose
@snapdragon93008 жыл бұрын
Well more likely RNZAF will be first, as we need to replace our entire airlift within 4 yrs. Austraila have had thier C 130 J models only 15 yrs or so. Ours with a few fuselage and avionics refits have operated since 1967.
@TXs147 жыл бұрын
The C-17 is not the same as the A400M by any means lol
@leneanderthalien7 жыл бұрын
? the C17 is twice bigger and tactic transport only, so no comparable to the A400M (not the same missions range)
@davidsadler4199 жыл бұрын
Not seen many videos of A400 start ups; and that one is quite outstanding. Hoping to visit Brize Norton next month and will be trying for an A400 flight.
@MrSoeberg9 жыл бұрын
David Sadler And I like the sound of the starting engines of this aircraft. I hope it will succeed and wish you a nice flight in the A400. Grtz.
@tobichallanger8 жыл бұрын
+MrSoeberg It does sound better than most aircrafts today but not as nice as the old DB 605 engines
@tobichallanger8 жыл бұрын
+MrSoeberg It does sound better than most aircrafts today but not as nice as the old DB 605 engines
@danielbetu5 жыл бұрын
Nice video!! It's pleasure to see large planes and hear the start of their engines, and finally see them take off!! But I don't understand why the dislikes, can someone please tell me? Thanks!
@kolerick4 жыл бұрын
what blow my mind each time I see this plane is how the props blades are almost parallel with the forward vector and still manage to push forward the plane... I'd love to to see the physic of it at first, I thought that the blades were reorienting themselves after start-up but this does seem a little over complicated and prone for system failure...
@HarryBalsark4 жыл бұрын
Blade angle changes constantly
@MrShaundarch8 жыл бұрын
Nice. Luftwaffe and Iron Cross though, always reminds me of history.
@Repented0088 жыл бұрын
+Shaun Donovan Hahaha! Ikr? Why they never rebranded, is a mystery.
@Towboatin8 жыл бұрын
+EvilBonesMan_666 Because the Wehrmacht used the Balkenkreuz, and because the iron cross as a symbol was around long before Nazi Germany.
@Repented0088 жыл бұрын
Captain Whisky Still...change can be refreshing.
@MrShaundarch8 жыл бұрын
Schinkel designed the Iron Cross didn't he?
@RJM10118 жыл бұрын
It's not the same iron cross as used in WW2 !
@overbank566 жыл бұрын
Those look like very advanced props.
@EstorilEm Жыл бұрын
It’s tough pushing 11,000hp to a propeller and maintaining efficiency. One way is contra-rotating props, but it’s heavy and complex (ie TU-95) - technology has come a long way and advanced scimitar props are nearly as good without the drawbacks.
@CharlieGordonRailfan8 жыл бұрын
I like the counter rotating props.
@Lobo2048 жыл бұрын
Yes they are.
@maurice59778 жыл бұрын
no, they are not, they are variable pitch........
@Lobo2048 жыл бұрын
Maurice Merritt watch the left engines start up, one is clockwise the other counter clockwise.
@maurice59778 жыл бұрын
the engines dont turn in the same direction , that is to counter act for torque..
@maurice59778 жыл бұрын
correction, the props.........
@normansufrin2075 жыл бұрын
Propellers on these babies are stunning
@EstorilEm Жыл бұрын
I’m lucky enough to have one at the Udvar Hazy air and space museum only 20 min away, I believe it was a test article.
@RichardShelton5 жыл бұрын
A beautiful aircraft, and would be a good "tweener" with the Hercules and the C-17.
@michaelogden59585 жыл бұрын
Interesting. On the A400M (or at least this one) engines 1 and 3 turn counterclockwise and engines 2 and 4 turn clockwise.
@danielmuller64545 жыл бұрын
That’s the case on all A400M existing
@danielmuller64545 жыл бұрын
This configuration, dubbed down between engines (DBE), allowing it to produce more lift and lessens the torque and prop wash on each wing. It also reduces yaw in the event of an outboard engine failure
@kurakuson5 жыл бұрын
It's amazing how something that big and heavy can get lift.
@Jabba16255 жыл бұрын
They still manage to load Gina Rhinehart on board a aircraft, so this should be no biggie
@mirceapaul97244 жыл бұрын
It's really making contrails in the sky?
@loneaxolotl6 жыл бұрын
@0:29 Nice iron cross on it's forehead. Very nice footage. I love it!
@nmspy5 жыл бұрын
(It’s called the Balkenkruez)
@Vince-g8q10 ай бұрын
@@nmspy Eiserneskreuz aber okay laber weiter
@pascalchauvet76254 жыл бұрын
Could it be that the engines cannot be started seperately, which means that the props have to be cranked together with the engine right from the beginning of the engine start procedure, like on old turboprop engines as was the case with the Rolls-Royce Dart/Tyne?
@EstorilEm Жыл бұрын
I’m pretty sure the props are still a free-turbine design like most turboprops. They are VERY large engines though, and it takes a while to spool the large scimitar props on that shaft.
@MakeeScience5 жыл бұрын
favorite Military Transport aircraft👍
@mickboakes70235 жыл бұрын
Great video. A very enjoyable watch. Regards. Mick.🇬🇧
@bobdyer4229 жыл бұрын
It would have been funny if the crow had perched itself on the re-fueling probe. Excellent vid, gives the chance for model builders who have not seen the 400 up-close a fantastic look at her. Thanks
@56hueycobra7 жыл бұрын
I Would Like to See the AIRBUS A-400M Turned into a GUNSHIP Like the Lockheed A/C-130H Model GUNSHIP With the 105mm Howitzer and 40mm Bofo Cannon and 25mm Gatling Gun 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@pascalchauvet76254 жыл бұрын
Is there any aircraft of comparable size which is so incredibly quiet?
@EstorilEm Жыл бұрын
The new C-130s with scimitar props are quiet, but obviously smaller.
@Narainseshadri19478 жыл бұрын
I just want to know whether Engine no. 1 & 3 rotate clockwise and 2 & 4 anti-clockwise.
@acrobaticcripple81765 жыл бұрын
Watch the take off.
@ahmettaskn56873 жыл бұрын
They are counter-rotating props which neutralize the roll effect of each prop
@McRocket8 жыл бұрын
Is it me - or these quieter then C-130's? Thanks for this.
@HarryBalsark8 жыл бұрын
they really are very quiet planes
@McRocket8 жыл бұрын
Which is surprising because turboprops are usually VERY noisy.
@HarryBalsark8 жыл бұрын
+McRocket especially the low end drone doesn't exist on this plane wich makes it hardly noticable flying at low alt
@evilload8 жыл бұрын
Those 8 bladed props make a big difference when compared to the 4/6 bladed ones on the C130's.
@acrobaticcripple81765 жыл бұрын
We get one occasionally over us in mid Wales. Don't think they're necessarily quieter, but a "smoother" sound. One can always differentiate. Lubberly!
@rachelsaviation3465 жыл бұрын
The plane should have been called the Hercmaster
@Gripenace4 жыл бұрын
Great and beautiful lifter :)
@livelongandprosper1695 жыл бұрын
Wo ist das aufgenommen worden? Laage???
@Hinarifansandmore132 жыл бұрын
that thing sounds like my box fan
@mitiusha6 жыл бұрын
Luftwaffe! Sounds great!
@Maloy78005 жыл бұрын
Luftwaffle sounds better. :-)))
@mikeking7334 жыл бұрын
Like something from Gerry Anderson's Thunderbirds TV Program. !
@viamilitaris0118 жыл бұрын
Nice video . Beautiful plane
@iginiobluevest92595 жыл бұрын
A400M air force, front BLACK NOSE 🐨
@dahuseventy8 жыл бұрын
No to savoy on physics, but can anyone explain why the propellers are spinning one way and the other the next way???
@Micromanfan8 жыл бұрын
All the answers are here: io9.gizmodo.com/why-do-wheels-sometimes-appear-to-spin-backwards-1593807400
@simondr708 жыл бұрын
Exactly and that's only the A400 that does that .
@CrazyForCooCooPuffs8 жыл бұрын
no
@shi018 жыл бұрын
It's to counter the roll momentum the props produce. It's simply based on newtons principal of action->reaction. If the probs would spin all in the same direction, they would generate an opposite force on the airframe. For instance if all props would spin clockwise, the airframe would have an tendency to roll anticlockwise. And the annoying thing is that the tendency varies when the poweroutput is changed. The effect gets stronger when more power is demanded. The solution Airbus has choosen for the A400M is one way to get rid of this effect. An other way is to use a contra rotating propeller like the russians did in the TU-95. But contra rotating props are heavier and more complicated to produce.
@leneanderthalien5 жыл бұрын
@@shi01 contra rotating props are heawier and a bit more complicated, but increase significant the efficiency ...this solution was not choice from Airbus only because they are much more noisy...see the AN70...
@Johnny64ism4 жыл бұрын
Anyone notice Engines 1 & 2 spun clock wise Engines 3 & 4 spun counter clock wise...or is that just me
@Rick20101004 жыл бұрын
all spin clockwise
@ВетреннаяРека3 жыл бұрын
Айробус А400М Атлас ✊👍🇰🇿🇰🇿
@enochpowelghost8 жыл бұрын
i could do with one of those engine fans to make my scrambled egg.
@Saf4San5 жыл бұрын
Those are called propellors or in short props not fans
@R3QMEDIA4 жыл бұрын
The audio sounds very similar to the turboprop simulator game
@56hueycobra7 жыл бұрын
Is the Eight Bladed Props On the AIRBUS A-400M Hamilton Stander Props?
@leneanderthalien6 жыл бұрын
the propellers are french, built by Ratier Figeac
@deaxynalcober14127 жыл бұрын
I want to be a military pilot, Is it weird of becoming a pilot if your afraid of heights?
@intercity22566 жыл бұрын
I am pretty much scared of heights, because I couldn't climb a 3meters wall, BUT, I love being on a plane, on a plane you don't feel the height.
@77HarleyRider6 жыл бұрын
No problem...just don't look outside the windows...
@zamanhussin50155 жыл бұрын
No problem, it's different when you're standing compare when you're at ht
@overbank566 жыл бұрын
Which is quietest? Turbo prop or, hi bypass turbo fan?
@leneanderthalien5 жыл бұрын
Bypass turbo fan, but the efficiency is much better with a turbo prop, the highest is with double counter rotative props like AN22 and AN70, but they are very noisy because air shearing between both props : hey are never supersonic, like whe read in some comments...,the only supersonic props was on the XF84H Thunderscreech and the supersonic propfan experimental engines: all was EXTREMLY noisy, the joke was about Tunderscreech: this aircraft doest need weapons, all ennemies at ground are killed from the noise in a low pass...
@jimfowler59307 жыл бұрын
Und wieder...liebe ich alles! The A400M does not have counter-rotating props-----just eight blades starting feathered, usually, and the video frames/second rate make the blades look counter-rotating. Check other videos of prop-type Flugzeugen and see this fps oddity. Love this, and all Luftwaffe -types!!
@HarryBalsark7 жыл бұрын
Jim Fowler they are counter rotating
@rasadhossin20844 жыл бұрын
Very nice like
@Davidsavage80083 жыл бұрын
American C17 gets higher quicker but give the Germans credit for them blades.
@EstorilEm Жыл бұрын
The C17 costs TWICE as much as the A400m, which has more advanced integrated systems and is a bit more efficient. If cost isn’t a factor, you can achieve some pretty incredible performance metrics (even for an older aircraft.)
@FyreSturmOfficial5 жыл бұрын
If you look closely you can see Benji hiding in the grass.
@macoi69i Жыл бұрын
Now I found the origin of the c400 sound
@swisschocolat0013 ай бұрын
Fr
@arnon-jaya7 жыл бұрын
thanks
@theroach22044 жыл бұрын
7:52 bird wanting to die
@Blime29137 жыл бұрын
Goodness grasious! How flipping beefy are thoses turboprop engines an prop blades, They must be soo frigging powerful!..How many flipping Prop blades can they eventually fit on to an engine, I should think if they go beyond a standard 8, The powerplants would essentially become UTF Engines/ Unducted Tubofan Engines or TurboProp Fan engines... I also would be surprised if the power plants it has on right now are a kind of simple UTF or TPF Engine solution.. Couse they sure do look like they are!. 😊😆😎⛅✈💨💨➖.
@ianteratai96613 жыл бұрын
A 400 M , keep flying. ! .
@Christopher_Adler5 жыл бұрын
One of these things flew over my house at like 200 meters, and gosh it's incredibly loud and scary af But really cool too
@glenn14119 жыл бұрын
Sir, you need to slow down the recording speed of the camera its "freezing" the propeller blades here its too fast ,thats fine for fast moving jets but shots like this you need to show the blades spinning naturally propeller blades on recorded film should just be a blur, the camera speed here is freezing them "still" it doesen look natural. take a look at the instructions for your camera there will be alternate slower recording speed's you can switch to that are slower for shots like this with propeller aircraft. kind regards.
@dxb80869 жыл бұрын
+Glenn Reay Nonsence. The framerate doesn't matter during a startup, where the propeller drive constantly changes from 0 to 864 min−1 -.-
@IrishManJT6 жыл бұрын
Very nice.
@ruiutomy15 жыл бұрын
Beautiful but very expensive.
@jjaus8 жыл бұрын
The props DO contra-rotate. Google is your friend...
@spleensthecat87765 жыл бұрын
Counter rotate.. Google is your friend
@spleensthecat87765 жыл бұрын
There's a big difference between counter and contra rotating propellers
@RJM10118 жыл бұрын
Looks great thank you for the video. :)
@rangganuganu31155 жыл бұрын
amazing plane
@melvyncox33618 жыл бұрын
Nice video there mate!
@MrSoeberg8 жыл бұрын
Thank you, always nice to hear. Grtz.
@snapdragon93008 жыл бұрын
Yeah, Its on the list for a replacement of our RNZAF C 130, i hope it makes the cut, and treasury doesnt run interference.
@nmspy6 жыл бұрын
Basically a newer c130
@leneanderthalien5 жыл бұрын
nope the A400M is totaly different, and much bigger as a C130 ...the size is between C130 and C17...
@ПеткоИванов-ъ8и7 жыл бұрын
C-400 ! SPECIAL OPERATION
@ПеткоИванов-ъ8и7 жыл бұрын
not M400A !!
@R3QMEDIA4 жыл бұрын
It's A400M
@irdischgalaxie35975 жыл бұрын
Wow Bravo Germania ,ich liebe Dich , Gruß vom DeuKkoatia !!!
@fabiorafaelramos44212 жыл бұрын
OU ENTÃO UM DESSE NO JOGO DO TURBOPROP FLIGHT SIMULATOR
@Mydoorman1112 жыл бұрын
TFS Moment
@anandkhumar044 жыл бұрын
My mother is the a 400
@ПеткоИванов-ъ8и7 жыл бұрын
TURBOPROP FLIGHT SIMULATOR ANDROID GAME
@Ford_Raptor_R_720hp_V88 жыл бұрын
*Nice but it doesn't outperform the C-17.*
@MrSoeberg8 жыл бұрын
+Escape for Mankind It is more a enlarged Hercules. Grtz.
@Ford_Raptor_R_720hp_V88 жыл бұрын
MrSoeberg *You're right, it falls between the C130 and the C17 in size, performance and price. So it fills a Niche.*
@bobalobalie8 жыл бұрын
Escape for Mankind Well, prop engines are more efficient per mile and EXPONENTIALLY more quiet than a jet engine, which is perfect for combat use. Such as air drops and Airborne troop assaults.
@leneanderthalien6 жыл бұрын
the C17 is a strategic transport, the A400M a tactic transporter who need to be much more flexible and rugged...
@user-yd9rm4ds8c5 жыл бұрын
Takes what a Hercules can't to places C17 can't. That was a promotional motto. Salud!
@overbank566 жыл бұрын
The one thing if like to see this thing do, that it may never do, is at least land vertically. And tilt _the engines 90°
@jorgesiqueira73175 жыл бұрын
E põe Bonito nisso
@Android-16-js6dn3ml2z7 жыл бұрын
I really like to see the heavy cargo planes of the Hercules type on the beach landing and flying up. Why does this scene remind me of a beautiful scene I saw in the past when Hercules Air Force planes brought doctors and nurses on the plane with drugs and food for the displaced from hurricanes, typhoons and earthquakes in other countries. I found politicians with the military and aeronautics making flights with Hercules planes to other countries carrying water, food and medicines and doctors and nurses to help the homeless and people in need of special medical care. We must make more Hercules planes that could land on the beaches because statistics indicate that there will be many hurricanes and typhoons and future earthquakes in the future and also tsunami because of the increasing pollution in the world that is changing the planet's climate.
@더불어터진당아웃5 жыл бұрын
저걸 뱅기라고 사라고 ㅋㅋㅋ
@ПеткоИванов-ъ8и7 жыл бұрын
43 21 start 1 2 3 4 MY GAME go start real wtf??
@خالدالشهري-ح7د6 жыл бұрын
C-130 king sky
@jesseslade3084 Жыл бұрын
Detroit red wings
@Hossman7579 жыл бұрын
Not a fan of Airbus aircraft AT ALL, however, this one is quite nice.
@MrSoeberg9 жыл бұрын
A nice aircraft or a nice video? ;-) Grtz.
@Repented0088 жыл бұрын
+Cameron Little The problem with Airbus is too many cooks in the kitchen. Conceptually though, their birds are awesome. They should just export their ideas to America. We know how to get things done, no fuss. Lol!
@wudruffwildcard2528 жыл бұрын
It is the same problem as it is with the dreamliner. You said it, too many cooks.
@jameshood61675 жыл бұрын
Let's take a crash course an stay on the ground.
@cesarandresrojasrodriguez67565 жыл бұрын
Diana
@jesseslade30848 ай бұрын
Los angeles angels
@chloetobin58794 жыл бұрын
Yhhh
@jesseslade308410 күн бұрын
Rosie red mascot new look 2025
@СашаСоколов-б8и6 жыл бұрын
Прикольно
@ПеткоИванов-ъ8и7 жыл бұрын
👊👊👊👍💪C-400 💪👍👊👊👊
@jondoe96695 жыл бұрын
German spruce goose
@marcdunord4 жыл бұрын
825kmh max... pretty good for Aindustries to finish 2nd 50 years after the tu95's (still going strong!) first reached 950kmh (with 1k-hp more per engine). Time for the A400 to go double-counter-rotating and become the civilian turboprop airliner that finally send the gas-guzzling f...g jets packing!
@Exodon20204 жыл бұрын
Yeah, but that speed came with its own downsides: A literal fuckton of Noise produced by the Counter-rotating blades. It's said that a Tu-95 passing the Ocean between Greenland, Iceland and the UK was perfectly audible by the Sosus-Array NATO mounted on the seafloor to spot Soviet Submarines heading for the open Atlantic. Being a nuclear Bomber the Bear could also be afforded to be a pretty slender design compared to the "fat" Atlas - which needs the additional meat for Cargo Capacity though.
@SatishsrinivasanLp6 жыл бұрын
Bird at 7:58
@victorschepers62864 жыл бұрын
Dislikes since it is not American i think😢😉🇳🇱🇪🇺
@ibmvietnam97907 жыл бұрын
viet nam dinh doc lap blow up half space ships
@edulemang39216 жыл бұрын
Kayak balingan nya gak muter..
@irfanismady15213 жыл бұрын
Asia first country has A400M :Malaysia
@Luckyamor5 жыл бұрын
It's to look like koala 🐨
@micahgotracksplays3405 жыл бұрын
César AT Nobre cuz the black nose XD
@berilberilbrianoctofianman20316 жыл бұрын
Waahhhhhhhhh
@blocksland817 Жыл бұрын
if you play TPFS it just looks fake the engines look fake if you play TPFS
@ProxolodRu5 жыл бұрын
No good
@Vinnay946 жыл бұрын
Not my proudest fap...
@abecoulter186 жыл бұрын
Jerky camera operator. No smooth panning
@lailamonika13194 жыл бұрын
Aial .añimal
@Emilia-gf9kp5 жыл бұрын
Z
@СлавичкаМалижонок6 жыл бұрын
Украинский Ан-70 лучше!!!
@williamosoriopineda12476 жыл бұрын
Palestina liberación
@sherwinsalvatori69975 жыл бұрын
Swam of beeeezee
@trumpsupporter7456 жыл бұрын
Wow at least one of this europe crap is flying :D
@Maloy78005 жыл бұрын
I don't know if this plane is good or bad. I suppose it's good because Germans and French have never made a bad plane. But MY GAWD, it's ugly!!!
@steve1978ger7 жыл бұрын
I like planes, but the history of the A400M is nothing but one big scandal. Fraught with huge technical difficulties, built an order of magnitude over budget at taxpayer's expense, to support foreign wars with questionable public support. Collecting that money and burning it on the spot might have been the better alternative.