Finally, a documentary that does not slander the Duchess of Windsor. Thank you!
@79Bobola7 ай бұрын
Agree!
@a.harrison37217 ай бұрын
Yes, it’s refreshing 😊
@dionnegonsalves81887 ай бұрын
@@a.harrison3721 certainly is ( for a change) 🙄
@countessAugusta7 ай бұрын
Finally. Because the majority of focos. has relied on documented evidence which,Im afraid reveals a vacuous spendthrift whos dalliances were legion.This one just went too far. Be careful what you wish for.
@nancyaguirre23074 ай бұрын
Why shouldn’t she be slandered? She was married, had an affair, didn’t want to be with Edward, admitted in writing that she used him, only married him because she didn’t feel she had a choice (in writing) and was miserable but made the best of it. She wanted to be queen, the titles, the deference… the only person besides Edward that gave it to her were Nazis and Hitler.
@Lonesome__Dove Жыл бұрын
His choice to abdicate was the best thing to ever happen to the UK and its people. Without that QE2 would of never been.
@lizziebkennedy7505 Жыл бұрын
So much for heredity being how god chooses monarchs
@KarenOCallaghan-u5o11 ай бұрын
If he had never had children, Elizabeth would have become Queen twenty years later than she did.
@kells1x11 ай бұрын
He never had children so if he didn't abdicate Elizabeth would have still been queen but in 1972
@catherinenewman65163 ай бұрын
Qe2 was ten at the time of the abdication
@KateTarrant-Dean Жыл бұрын
We never forgave her but we never forgave him more. As it turned out, we got a fabulous King who had courage and led us through WWII.
@acustomer721611 ай бұрын
@KateTarrant-Dean YES!!. bless him, how stressful it had to be for George VI, who was happy leading a quiet life with his wife & daughters.
@ilovebeinagirl7 ай бұрын
So given what you said, I'm not sure why you never forgave him. He was in love. He got what he wanted. You got what you wanted---an amazing king who bore an amazing queen. Where's the loss? He tried to get them to accept her, they wouldn't so he left it because--GASP!--she meant more to him. If you are married, I would love to know how you would've felt if your husband would've said--"well Kate, the tail was amazing. Thanks for letting me hit it, but I have to go kinging now, so see ya on the flip side! Buh-bye!" As a person who's wasted FAR too much of my life doing what ingrates wanted and thought "Was best" being screwed for it and never having them reciprocate when their turn came--good for Edward for looking out for himself. No one else would have or did and he saw that when they kicked him to the curb. That's EXACTLY the type of family you would throw away the crown you didn't want in the first place for. And y'all need to stop being butt hurt that he abdicated. He was a TERRIBLE king! And you probably would've been speaking German had he NOT abdicated You all were done a HUGE favor.
@leekamini63547 ай бұрын
@Kate Toorant-Dean Wouldn't it rather be Winston Churchill who was courageous and who led you through WW 2 ? 😉
@KNByam2 ай бұрын
@@acustomer7216 When fate summons, monarchs must obey.
@kyliecross2156 Жыл бұрын
I personally feel that his obsession with Wallace Simpson was an act of divine intervention. Regardless of his popularity, he did not have the selfless and dutiful personality that the following two monarchs both had in spades. And his views towards Nazi Germany speak to his true character.
@lizziebkennedy7505 Жыл бұрын
She was the true Nazi, not him. His tour of London s east end, while Prince of Wales got him into trouble with George V when he famously said “something must be done “, about poverty. And ppl who refuse to pay tax aren’t selfless, they’re greedy.
@scarlettwinters5642 Жыл бұрын
In the end the crown ended up on the right head
@rogerfielding1117 Жыл бұрын
She was Wallis
@marlenewolffe4613 Жыл бұрын
@kyliecross I totally agree. We would all be talking German!! The holy trinity did the world a big favour. Has this lady read the files on Edward and Wallis???? Not to mention Edward's own FATHER said he would not be a good king! This documenrty goes against the actual historic proof
@christinadiaz434911 ай бұрын
Yes. I came here to say the same. You said it better than I could have.
@thejournalkeeper Жыл бұрын
I have read many books and watched many documentaries on this couple. Many feel Wallis wanted to be Queen - not sure that is the case- but one thing is certain, Edward did NOT want to be King. I believe he planned a way out knowing that Wallis would not be acceptable and it would end in abdication, so he would be free to lead his own life. Unfortunately it backfired somewhat in that they were never wanted back in England and spent an aimless life.
@aprilgrant195711 ай бұрын
"Be careful what you wish for; you just might get it."
@shellytracy539611 ай бұрын
I don't think she wanted to be queen. I don't think she really wantrd him-just the perks of being the royal faborite. But she got stuck with him
@thejournalkeeper11 ай бұрын
@@shellytracy5396 I agree, you can imagine being overwhelmed by the attention, money , gifts, high society, but she let it go on too long. it was a pity Ernest didn't stand up to her and say end it now!
@joanbeal151011 ай бұрын
Harry and Rachel are our version of the Windsors
@eileengallagher43111 ай бұрын
Edward VIII & P. Harry really do share tremendous similarities; tragically. E.VIII’s life is a cautionary tale for H. & his family. H. Does not appear to have any skills for introspection or taking responsibility for his life choices. His decision to drop all his responsibilities & walk away during a time of a pending world war was a blessing & astoundingly selfish. I believe Wallis had more power to influence his decision than this writer maintains. W.S. was not a victim. Any more than M.M. Is. Granted, W. reportedly had great regrets after marrying Edward, settling for members of the international cafe society instead of courtiers, & denied the style of HRH. However, she was showered with one of couture clothing & a gobsmacking jewelry collection. We all make choices. I hope it was worth it. Sadly Wallis outlived Edward by many yrs. & died alone.🕊️
@aprilsky847411 ай бұрын
England got the right king when Edward abdicated, no two ways about it. Edward got who he wanted, selfish as usual
@yass50828 ай бұрын
She looks much more sophisticated than the Queen mother
@79Bobola7 ай бұрын
Agree, and she’s 4 years older, which is crazy
@HolmesLaneGuy6 ай бұрын
Elizabeth Bowes Lyons was an English rose. Wallis Warfield Simpson was a cactus.
@geraldtyus86456 ай бұрын
@@HolmesLaneGuybowed Lyon was a pudding, a Shepard's pie puddle of pudge.
@PatriciaPalmer-o3e8 ай бұрын
❗Bless you Wallace. You saved a nation by marrying their King.
@marilynpenner919611 ай бұрын
How can Wallis Simpson be called a "king maker"? Not her fault, but the affair took down a king, not made one.
@pinkuniverse84766 ай бұрын
Because it did both? It took down a king but made QEIi’s daddy King which put her directly in the line of succession whereas had WS not been in the picture we wouldn’t know or care wtf Baldylocks and his missing wife are now.
@cschof4351 Жыл бұрын
I don't believe she was intersex and she wouldn't have told any man about it before her wedding .
@dddddadadad179611 ай бұрын
Agreed
@barbarasanders796511 ай бұрын
It seems unlikely that two husbands would ignore that fact.
@avivatal61410 ай бұрын
Could you please explain in more detail what is intersex, was she operated on or got other treatment.
@79Bobola7 ай бұрын
No, but she did like the company of women, and him men.
@gc3847 Жыл бұрын
HE was incredibly selfish. A bigger person would NEVER have put someone they loved through the shit he put her through. He was a coward who hid behind her ,for 35 years ,allowing her to take the flak and damning her ,to a whole generation. He wasnt up to the job ,his popularity created by ,what we call today "spin" ,went to his empty little pea brain. I never thought her ,particularly likeable either ,but she did deserve better than what she got . If the powers that were, did conspire to rid us of this clown ,then thank God they did . Probably the last sensible thing any British politicians did.
@79Bobola7 ай бұрын
Yes THIS, thank you 👏🏼
@countessAugusta7 ай бұрын
I think she did deserve what she got. She unscrupulously chased dtatus and prestige.... Well she got a form of it. She was avaricious and she got wealth and expensive objets d art and jeeellry and homes and servants. She was as foolish and vacuous as he. He at leadt had the excuse of a dreadfully screwed up childhood
@amytrottier883611 ай бұрын
I am beginning to feel empathy towards Mrs. Simpson. A lifetime with a completely infantile man, ugh!
@barbarasanders796511 ай бұрын
She didn't to have any affairs she had a husband in her life
@janielogan-bell284210 ай бұрын
I don't feel sorry for her, but I understand that she had issues like the rest of us do. The intersex thing is new, and I don't believe it.
@jgibbs65110 ай бұрын
Edward had the self-awareness of a brick. What on earth did he think would happen - that the RF and the British public would welcome his American divorcee with open arms? This was a society in which even the "innocent" party in a divorce was prevented from attending Court, couldn't enter the royal enclosure at Ascot, was not "received" in many households - why did he think things would be any different for him and Wallis? The answer is that, with his usual arrogance, he thought the rules wouldn't (shouldn't) apply to him. Of course, with the benefit of hindsight we can see that in fact Wallis Simpson did Britain a huge favour in removing from the scene a man wholly unsuited to the role to which he was born. Yes, there probably was what would now be termed emotional neglect, but he wasn't specially singled-out in this, and we know that he, rather than being a unifying figure for his siblings, in fact undermined, disrespected or was downright cruel to more than one of them. His feelings and thoughts on his unfortunate youngest brother Johnny can only be described as abhorrent, and his bullying of his brother Bertie is well-documented. Outside the family, his treatment of his female lovers once an affair had ended was cavalier and nasty, proving that he didn't reserve his unpleasant traits for his family.
@elizabethroberts62159 ай бұрын
……he’d the mental age of a 14yo.
@Nigelsmom213622 күн бұрын
His immaturity was joked about by Wallis and her second husband Ernest. They referred to him as Peter Pan. Wallis was very cruel to Edward throughout the marriage. So maybe Edward got some of his own back.
@Lucy0809 Жыл бұрын
She loved her dogs. As an animal lover that’s good enough for me. I also admire her for not breeding ❤
@tessdurberville71111 ай бұрын
Yes. She also did not pretend to have children.
@Jackie-v3z5e2 ай бұрын
Hitler liked animals too
@Nigelsmom213622 күн бұрын
Another story went around that Wallis was unable to have children because of a botched abortion.
@felicityparr-cn5yy5 ай бұрын
She didn't change the course of history.He did.
@DanielEckhout10 ай бұрын
I also think that Mr Simpson initially encouraged the relationship between Wallis and Wales. It opened doors that were previously closed to him. But be careful what you wish for. I truly believe that Wallis and her husband had not anticipated that the relationship would go so far and found they had ended up between a rock and a hard place. How the heck could she get away from Wales???????
@HarryMarsee-fw9ot10 ай бұрын
I have watched several stories about Mrs. Simpson and I have NEVER heard such outrageous excuses as this woman has out forth. Madam, you insult your audience by assuming we are all idiots! She may have been intersexed, as in not having a womb; but, to still be a virgin!!!!? 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Justintime61910 ай бұрын
Our choices have consequences. We will all pay the debt of our choices one day.
@bernardcassidy6497 Жыл бұрын
Had he known how unpleasant his situation would be after the abdication, he would have abdicated for sure , he was a complete coward and didn't want the responsibility ( and hard work ) of being King , she was the perfect excuse, he knew without a shadow of a doubt that a twice divorced woman, with two living ex husbands could never, under any circumstances be Queen of Great Britain and the dominions, impossible , the very rules surrounding this were non negotiable , he could quite justifiably been incarcerated as a national security threat or exiled without titles of any kind and no income, in a sense it was a national crime that he committed , having played the role of Prince of Wales with the expectation of becoming King, then the great betrayal. A God job if there ever was one .
@geraldtyus8645 Жыл бұрын
Shut up. Look who's on the throne now. He is far worse than The Duke and the consortium is an odious homewrecker.
@virginiasoskin908211 ай бұрын
Thank you for thus very good documentary that goes deeper into Wallace's psyche.
@elizabethroberts62159 ай бұрын
……Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon had a lot to do in getting rid of KEVIII from the throne, because he’d spurned her when they were younger. She was a narcissist, & took her revenge on him………
@mrskenscott9643 Жыл бұрын
RIP Wallace. ❤
@Oughut883 ай бұрын
Hardly a kingmaker when she didn’t want to marry him in the first place.
@sallypettit715611 ай бұрын
29:35 First time I have seen this coverage. Thank you
@irinaryabicheva273910 ай бұрын
The wonderful film. Thanks a lot
@Ed-uz6em Жыл бұрын
Divine intervention
@prug217710 ай бұрын
Is anyone keeping count of how many times this lady says “milieu”?… 🤷🏻♀️
@DanielEckhout10 ай бұрын
I think you might be a little mistaken over the married woman thing. The heirs and the spares have always preferred married women as their mistresses. In fact this was expected as first of all the women had experience which generally led to the royal involved to tend to stick to her while he sows his royal oats and the obvious reason is that the potential illegitimate offspring of the pair could be explained away by the husband. The husband pretty much always knew what was going on and it was often in his interest to look the other way.
@barryvincentredmond39734 ай бұрын
Such a well narrated documentary,and great footage.The two interviews for tv from the 50's and 1969 would perhaps have been good additional material,also Edward and Wallace's time living in the Bahamas during WW2 was not covered.
@yvetterock272810 ай бұрын
And now there is Camila.
@marjorielewis99304 ай бұрын
History does not always tell the true facts accept what is fact and what you can see and what make sence
@zhehuliachumi466910 ай бұрын
Wallis changed the course of history
@theresapierce393411 ай бұрын
How about all the money he took that should have been his brothers.
@victorinesanders623411 ай бұрын
What research? Wallis did nothing except to ridicule and humiliate the poor man.
@unasperanza980311 ай бұрын
Yup so many testimonials.
@79Bobola7 ай бұрын
Because he was a sniveling man-child, who had Peter Pan syndrome. That would wear on anyone. He also manipulated her by threatening to off himself if she didn’t marry him, so she had no choice.
@a.harrison37217 ай бұрын
He was man child who was overly needy, and he enjoyed her treating him that way.
@gorgiegorgie11726 ай бұрын
Very biased in favor of Wallis. No, I'm sorry, she did NOT 'try to make him happy every day', that is just ridiculous. There are any number of verifiable accounts of her despising him more or less openly, at least in the presence of others. Theirs was NOT a 'love story', it was a story about obsession and narcissism. It's a big mistake historically to make 'victims' or martyrs out of selfish people. They were not only traitors to their countries and active pro-Nazis, they were traitors to decency and humanity. The fact that they were rich and celebrated for the rest of their miserable, useless lives is testament to the bad judgement humans make about other humans and how evil is often rewarded. We need to consider that more now than ever, what with all this counter-factual 'revisionism' of history's villains. King George XI and Queen Elizabeth were the heroes of this piece. Wallis and David the villains.
@jilltagmorris3 ай бұрын
This has a few really major errors. But, I love these programs ❤❤❤
@dionnegonsalves81885 ай бұрын
Thank you, David & Wallis... why? 🤔 .... for giving us "The" Queen Elizabeth II ... (although we know she would've preferred a life OUT of public life) She Served. 🙏🏽
@RobertHunt-vd8vy4 ай бұрын
She had some Extra Kids here. So did He. No DNA back then....NOW it's Different.... Think Folks....
@lianefehrle992111 ай бұрын
That of her being intersex is a new for me to hear. I have been interested about this couple for over 40 years and this is the first of me hearing this new scandal
@lporquai904811 ай бұрын
Its been said for many years I'm surprised you never heard it...I'm not quite sure if it was just a nasty rumour or it was true
@79Bobola7 ай бұрын
She was very androgynous, not sure about the intersex, but she did like the company of women, and he liked the company of men, both were bisexual, which is why I think they royal family wanted him out of their lives sadly.
@suesokoloski664411 ай бұрын
This poor woman, she was treated so badly by all shame on them..
@lporquai904811 ай бұрын
Like how Megan has been treated
@MwR_MWR10 ай бұрын
She was also a social climber, an adulterer, and liked Nazi enemies of GB
@79Bobola7 ай бұрын
Agree, I feel bad when I hear other people slander her.
@Gregm-l9r Жыл бұрын
Wallis simpson . King maker or king taker ??
@lizziebkennedy7505 Жыл бұрын
You can’t take a king without his consent
@shellytracy539611 ай бұрын
Neither. He was fit, and she hot stuck with him
@jeantillotson409111 ай бұрын
Kingbreaker!
@OdiesMama10 ай бұрын
Bizarre title, isn't it?
@nancyfearday96017 ай бұрын
I think maybe the term Kingmaker refers to Bertie becoming king because of Edward insisting that he marry Wallis. She indirectly caused the abdication.
@Sharon_Mc9 ай бұрын
🇬🇧 My Great Aunt was cook to Wallis Simpson when she stayed at the Beach House , Felixstowe awaiting her divorce. Also my birth Mother's second husband, Gordon Rogers, ( of the Rogers Brothers, Felixstowe ) , bought Harvest House Hotel, Felixstowe , this is where Wallis and Edward 8th spent some time.
@79Bobola7 ай бұрын
Did your great aunt have good things to say about her? I heard she was quite nice and easy to talk to.
@Sharon_Mc7 ай бұрын
I didn’t ever meet my Great aunt. In her book, The Heart has its Reason's , Wallis Simpson mentions the 2 staff, and if I remember correctly, she wasn't very complimentary. Apparently my great aunt had to have French cooking lessons. This was all told to me by my birth mother, ( I'm adopted) , who used to live in Felixstowe.
@79Bobola7 ай бұрын
@@Sharon_Mc thanks for replying. I’ve heard mixed things regarding Wallis, she was kind to all the children when they lived in the Bahamas, they had nice things to say about her, she use to invite them along to picnics and always make time to talk to them, but I’ve read some stories from people whose family were from Baltimore where she grew up, said she could he rather snobbish. All very interesting, thanks for sharing your story 😊
@Sharon_Mc7 ай бұрын
@@79Bobola I suppose my great aunt was looked upon as ' just staff. '
@SomeOne-mp6ym5 ай бұрын
I think David did not want to be constrained by the responsibilities of being King.....Wallis doesn't want to marry him but she's the bet shot he has to get out of it. I guess it turned out for the best...as Queen Elizabeth II became the most loved Queee ever.❤️
@martagaines727211 ай бұрын
King breaker
@shonaleroux90604 ай бұрын
Sooooo sad to me she was just wonderful. Sad story. ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@janehastie3464Ай бұрын
Bith Wallis and Edward were well suited for each other. They were both shallow, frivolous, callous and indifferent people. They never expressed regret for being close friends with Adolph Hitler and the Nazi leaders and betraying Great Britain during the early part of World War II. They lived in great comfort in the Bahamas when the Allies were fighting in North Africa and then Europe against the oppression and murderous policies of the Nazis.
@olgaaros10018 ай бұрын
Su cara de tristeza y soledad en su casamiento. Parecia pequeño y derrotado sin la pompa y los ilustres personajes de su familia. El se lo buscó.
@mariamyleneillera540911 ай бұрын
I thought that before wallis his affair was with a eoman named thelma furness.
@elizabethroberts62159 ай бұрын
……as well as Freda Dudley-Ward…………
@Attingham6 ай бұрын
Thelma was ANDERSON COOPERS Great aunt the twin of his Grandmother…
@lisah721510 ай бұрын
Uncle Solomon was the brother of Wallis’s father, not the brother of her mother
@janielogan-bell284210 ай бұрын
Intersex. No, I don't believe that.
@oc253811 ай бұрын
12:29 😮😮 what, she was intersexed?? Really, how does anyone know this?
@79Bobola7 ай бұрын
They don't, it’s a rumor
@rosetyner775810 ай бұрын
The title should be😢 "KINGBREAKER "
@79Bobola7 ай бұрын
Nah
@marilynpenner919611 ай бұрын
If Wallis and Edward had not met, would Edward have been a good king, or even a king who merely went through the motions? I think George VI was a good king. He went through the motions because he knew it was best for the country, and he wanted to serve his country because he was royal and being king was the family job. It was what his family paid to wear the crown jewels. I suspect that Edward did not want to be king. It was a burden. Then, when he realized that he had given up respect and love to his stuttering brother, and that George was actually doing grood and even great as king, then he realized that he wanted the glory of being the hero king. He couldn't respect himself. Wallis could not respect him for quitting, so he could not respect himself.
@annafarago65278 ай бұрын
His brother was a better King and Elizabeth his wife a better Queen mother
@michele-su6zy4 ай бұрын
Both horrendous. And please don’t confuse cunning with intelligence
@bejoyful11 ай бұрын
Wallis had style and class; imagine if her Uncle Saul did leave her his millions which she was entitled to. We ended up with two adulterers as King and Queen now (heading the Church of England).
@olavwilhelm68436 ай бұрын
1936 was the year of 3 kings in England ....1888 was the year of 3 Emperors in Germany
@alinaCatwatcher Жыл бұрын
Everyone know that King George the 5th was a rotter.
@rogerfielding111711 ай бұрын
How is she a Kingmaker
@jeantillotson409111 ай бұрын
That’s what I was wondering. Maybe Kingbreaker would be a better fit.
@79Bobola7 ай бұрын
Because she made Edward's brother George, King, due to Edward marrying her. She saved the monarch
@rogerfielding11177 ай бұрын
@@79Bobola George became King because Edward abdicated not because he married Wallis. She was still married at the time of the abdication.
@a.harrison37217 ай бұрын
@@rogerfielding1117 that’s why he abdicated though, because they wouldn’t allow the marriage, so yes, it was because of her.
@rogerfielding11176 ай бұрын
She didnt make George king, it was his birthright@@79Bobola
@anitamackinnon7975 Жыл бұрын
Why would they?
@sarahjtripodi15149 ай бұрын
Not very historically accurate.
@TorchwoodPandP10 ай бұрын
Surely you mean King-Breaker?
@79Bobola7 ай бұрын
Surely you don’t grasp what the title actually means
@Sonia-d3h6 ай бұрын
❤❤❤
@Kimberly-cx9uv Жыл бұрын
I'm also intersexed, it's surprising to hear about Wallis perhaps having been aswell..!
@Celisar111 ай бұрын
She wasn’t. Just a mean rumour.
@shellytracy539611 ай бұрын
Maybe she was...he was known to have a few sexual quirks of his own.
@MCS7000Ай бұрын
All the best to you. God has made us all unique.
@SuzanneJeffersMolina10 ай бұрын
King Breaker
@kalligirl437411 ай бұрын
Wallis was a gold digger! She did not love Edward! She wanted desperately to be accepted into the British aristocracy! She played with fire and got burnt, but make no mistake, she knew exactly what she was doing! Only when it appeared there would be negative and severe repercussions for herself did she start to retract! Wallis dated the Edward, went on trips with him for months leaving her husband home alone! Ernest is the real hero, I’d love to see a documentary on him one day!
@Celisar111 ай бұрын
No, she was not. She desperately wanted out of the relationship before the wedding but caved when Edward threatened with suicide. Why don’t you inform yourself before spreading falsehoods?
@shellytracy539611 ай бұрын
Ernest encouraged it. The husnands of the royal favorites also get perks
@patriciamoed924410 ай бұрын
Or the Harry and Megan story.
@79Bobola7 ай бұрын
Eww no
@MeMyIdea11 ай бұрын
Wow ! Lots of hate, jealous, and uneducated speeches here about Wallis and Edward ! Let's open your mind, this is the year of 2024 ! Compared to Charles & Camilla and Harry & Meghan in 2024, Edward & Wallis are the angels and innocents !
@79Bobola7 ай бұрын
Exactly, thank you.
@user-lz6dm5lk9y10 ай бұрын
Are these videos narrated by computers? Too many words are badly mispronounced for me to believe otherwise.
@CynthiaWoodard-g6e11 ай бұрын
The British people forgave the "Rottweiler Camellia"but couldn't forgive Wallis Simpson
@tessdurberville71111 ай бұрын
Hardly the same thing.
@tessdurberville71111 ай бұрын
Hardly the same thing.
@tessdurberville71111 ай бұрын
Hardly the same thing.
@a.harrison37217 ай бұрын
@@tessdurberville711 very much the same thing. Hypocrites!!
@mylesfaulkner6510 ай бұрын
When they live off of taxpayers their private life isn’t their own.
@nanabutner Жыл бұрын
Such hogwash!
@Lizwindsor Жыл бұрын
Oh poor nana like to be a subservient peasant to the toxic royals. Sad.
@lizziebkennedy7505 Жыл бұрын
How so? She did love animals and she did not breed.
@unasperanza980311 ай бұрын
The second, Boston-born Cleveland Amory, who spent six months talking to the Duke and Duchess and their friends, was shocked at how gratuitously vicious Wallis could be to her husband, often leaving him in tears. She’d allow her pug dogs into the sitting-room, but keep the Duke’s dogs out, much to his distress. Or she’d be furious when he kept singing jingles from adverts he’d seen on television, or used Americanisms such as ‘I guess’ or ‘making a buck’. ‘The Duchess was a complicated person - cold, mean-spirited, a bully and a sadist,’ says Amory’s stepdaughter Dr Gaea Leinhardt. @@lizziebkennedy7505
@79Bobola7 ай бұрын
Yes you are hogwash
@shadrach629911 ай бұрын
What snobs!
@lporquai9048 Жыл бұрын
I feel megan and wallis are exactly same in terms of how the British press and public gave treated them ...
@kimlebrun519611 ай бұрын
Megan deserves every rotten thing throw at her!!! WALLIS ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!!!!!!!
@shellytracy539611 ай бұрын
Nope. Most of the similarties are betweenHarry, and Edward...weak, abd stupid. Edward left and stil wanted ti be treated like royalty. So does Harry. Megraine stalked Harry, and decided was going to change thr Monarchy. Wallis wanted a few perks and to go home to her husband.
@kells1x11 ай бұрын
Completely agree very sad to see it happen 80 years on.
@lporquai904811 ай бұрын
@@shellytracy5396how did she want to change the monarchy? She was doing everything she waa told to do at first, but thing is she wasn't from that lifestyle...she was an outsider kate is from that type of lifestyle...and weather people want to acknowledge or accept it ger colour does have something do with it ...she was never going to be accepted EVER so what could she do ?
@lporquai904811 ай бұрын
@@shellytracy5396Wallis going home to which husband are you talking about Ernest or Edward?
@Nottherebutthere11 ай бұрын
Don't you mean king killer?
@79Bobola7 ай бұрын
NOPE. How do you not know what she means by this title???
@suemcgregor9248 Жыл бұрын
The woman had extra-marital affairs all her adult life. She never went near Edward in the last days of his life, too busy sleeping around
@sarah6557 Жыл бұрын
Weres the proof she had affairs?
@porkchopproductions0314 Жыл бұрын
@@sarah6557She had an ongoing affair with Hitler's UK ambassador Von Ribbentrop (Discovered by declassified UK documents when they did surveillance on her once they found out)
@lizziebkennedy7505 Жыл бұрын
How do you know? It’s just bollocks. Ironic though, because the Royal Family is notorious for it.
@porkchopproductions0314 Жыл бұрын
@@lizziebkennedy7505 There's a Guardian article that talks about an FBI memo with a testimony if someone close to the family, the German side, who said she would receive 17 roses from him which was 1 for everytime they were together. I agree though that the royals were hypocrites about affairs since they were so commonplace
@lporquai9048 Жыл бұрын
Yes, how do you know ?
@sharnelledebysingh159111 ай бұрын
I personally support Wallace and Edward....they were avid animal lovers...good enough for me ❤
@unasperanza980311 ай бұрын
The second, Boston-born Cleveland Amory, who spent six months talking to the Duke and Duchess and their friends, was shocked at how gratuitously vicious Wallis could be to her husband, often leaving him in tears. She’d allow her pug dogs into the sitting-room, but keep the Duke’s dogs out, much to his distress. Or she’d be furious when he kept singing jingles from adverts he’d seen on television, or used Americanisms such as ‘I guess’ or ‘making a buck’. ‘The Duchess was a complicated person - cold, mean-spirited, a bully and a sadist,’ says Amory’s stepdaughter Dr Gaea Leinhardt.
@tessdurberville71111 ай бұрын
Hitler supposedly loved his dogs too. Before he committed suicide he shot his German Shepherd who had recently had puppies, worried that she might be adopted by a Jew. The Windsors were friends with such a person.
@jakecavendish347011 ай бұрын
Natty or juice?
@JenJ202310 ай бұрын
I think he was gay. Makes so much sense.
@elizabethroberts62159 ай бұрын
……bi………
@79Bobola7 ай бұрын
Both were bisexual, yes. That’s they got rid of him.
@MCS7000Ай бұрын
Scotty Bowers says in his book they were both gay.