The future elite of aeronautical engineering right here, in the comments.
@jamestorrentera5 жыл бұрын
Michel ouch 😂 your joke made my stomach hurt from so much laughter
@catfish2524 жыл бұрын
Pilot gave a great presentation of the Cat III auto-land system.
@SimbaC20075 жыл бұрын
Who's the person who decided to put a GoPro in front of the PFD?
@mojo76184 жыл бұрын
Some one who is either too important or doesnt give a shit about getting a write up.
@bgamelson3 жыл бұрын
@@mojo7618 Write-up for what?
@mojo76183 жыл бұрын
@@bgamelson for straightening up after touch down, apparently it’s against etihad sop
@rayanaltowayan95583 жыл бұрын
@@mojo7618 it's not Etihad tho
@FLYWITHRAYAAN3 жыл бұрын
Loll
@omarijoseph31895 жыл бұрын
beautiful work..Captain did a great job of explaining every step of the way...
@AviationNut5 жыл бұрын
The first ever Autoland performed on a passenger aircraft was done by the British in March of 1964. The plane was the British Trident flown by BEA. The first ever Autoland performed with passengers on board was done also in a Trident aircraft in April of 1965, flown by BEA pilots. The second aircraft model to install the Autoland system was the American built L-1011 TriStar.
@Foxy-rj8yw2 жыл бұрын
l-1011 was such a good plane it just came to the market too late
@h4runx2 жыл бұрын
A category III approach (CAT III with 0 visibility) are rarely executed because most aircraft don't have the equipment, plus once you land with that kind of visibility taxiing can be impossible or incredibly dangerous. and also the pilots have to be authorized to this landing. Not every pilot can land cat3. and also the airport infrastructure must be suitable for cat3.
@SAIFBIN4 жыл бұрын
Great stuff. I have a new respect for all those who ensure our safe passage from one airport to another.
@alftupper93595 жыл бұрын
I bought my Passat from Autoland.
@thehonestdoctor35904 жыл бұрын
😂
@gdsnuff4 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@wankhairulanuar17844 жыл бұрын
Share me location...
@stevewilliams23054 жыл бұрын
Autoland, Autoland, 1-800-AUTOLAND
@togafly.3 жыл бұрын
Lmao 🤣
@JuanLuisEcheverria4 жыл бұрын
Imagine the passengers face if captain would tell them: "Today, we are gonna test the automatic landing system.."
@mikehouqe86343 жыл бұрын
Would they tell the passengers?
@phoman25972 жыл бұрын
what if there were no passengers
@ChannelReuploads94512 жыл бұрын
@@mikehouqe8634 Most Airlines have a policy of informing passengers of their intent. To quote one of the Pilots on the QF32 Incident at Singapore, "You cannot just palm off a 'Technical issue' to passengers these days".
@ChannelReuploads94512 жыл бұрын
@@phoman2597 Then they tell the Freight.
@bigd58992 жыл бұрын
@@ChannelReuploads9451 When the pilot lands the aircraft manually he’s not doing it on feel and vibes, he is following the glideslope the flight computer is telling him to follow. A stressed pilot could make mistakes, it has happened that they diverged from the glideslope, got too slow, too fast etc. Autopilots don’t make these random errors, they cant forget flaps, gear or brakes and monitor every single instrument simultaneously. Meaning if the autopilot crashes a human probably wouldn’t have stood a chance. Which is why you wouldn’t get told when you’re about to do an automated landing.
@billbarton635 жыл бұрын
Another excellent video. Great explanation of the autoland function.
@GCEGZ5 жыл бұрын
excellent video. i was convinced it was done in a sim until they taxi'd off!!
@HNT635 жыл бұрын
Absolutely beautiful. Justplanes always have great music tracks on these that I wish I could purchase
@nunugod43275 жыл бұрын
Save only for good weather.. nice explanation capt
@nikobelic42515 жыл бұрын
nunugod I think he meant calm winds
@dkdanis13404 жыл бұрын
It lands plane when pilots can't or it's hard to land (heavy fog).
@fastica5 жыл бұрын
Imagine the clueless passengers complementing the captain with a "nice landing"
@GCEGZ5 жыл бұрын
Or even worse, applauding!
@MaxPower8885 жыл бұрын
@MistakenBacon Exactly, the pilot programmed the system and monitored it to ensure the landing was performed properly. Ultimately the pilot still controlled the aircraft, just indirectly.
@opus4rv5 жыл бұрын
It doesn't exactly land itself unless the pilot asks it to or knows what he's doing via many months of training. The systems are there for safety of you and the plane, not to make the pilot 'non-existent".
@cockatoo0105 жыл бұрын
Autolands are not as smooth as manuals as the AP flares a bit earlier
@rontiemens25535 жыл бұрын
And why not. If anything goes wrong, the civil aviation authorities are not going to go after the autoland hardware/software first, they are going to go after the captain.
@qahirattafash Жыл бұрын
الحمدلله على السلامه يا كابتن .. كان هبوط آلي رائع اول مره اشاهده❤
@robertlafnear48654 жыл бұрын
I THINK my flight from Denver to Medford July 2018,.. heavy smoke...90 deg. temps was an Auto Land ........ we hit the ground almost in reverse, hard braking, spoilers out 2' off the ground and we used ALL of the runway................. GREAT FLIGHT UNITED ! SUPER GOOD LANDING ! Thank You JUST PLANES. That Captain earned his days pay for sure.
@Delfi19003 жыл бұрын
Airbus telemetry so simplified and yet so accurate and dependable….👍🏼🙏🏻🇺🇸
@SergioHidalgoAero2 жыл бұрын
Hello! I wonder if I could use a piece of this video for a short documentary I am creating about approaches and landings, I would link to your channel of course, thanks
@derrick_blak_5 жыл бұрын
I don't know about the non sterile cockpit during approach plus the gopro blocking the pfd of the pilot flying !! But nice job from the captain and justplanes
@markofexcellence52095 жыл бұрын
Yeah, exactly my thought. It actually made me nervous and I wasn’t even in the plane! I feel like this was too casual, but it’s his aircraft. 🤐
@derrick_blak_5 жыл бұрын
@@markofexcellence5209 yeah. That guy was too casual with everything. But hes obviously well experienced
@derrick_blak_5 жыл бұрын
@Sam Lutfi not sure about that one . It should apply
@ErmakDimon5 жыл бұрын
Pilot Derrick it is sterile, sterile cockpit permits conversations regarding the flight
@derrick_blak_5 жыл бұрын
@@ErmakDimon I understand. But conversations should be things regarding the approach and landing. Things that might impact the flight I presume But the guy was focusing on the camera crew instead
@CraigArndt5 жыл бұрын
That’s truly an amazing system.
@tekipakupa86484 жыл бұрын
There goes my Job.....
@haruspex1-504 жыл бұрын
Exactly what my dad said 😂
@urhiredhr4212 жыл бұрын
Just amazing and interesting for sure! Glad you are two professionals in the cabin!
@waqasahmed81324 жыл бұрын
Pilot was very confident, also a very good Presentation at the critical phase of the flight. 👍
@Lilyan409 Жыл бұрын
I’m very proud of this excellent Pilots👨✈️ this we need to innovate and change the world in a positive way,
@rexracer18722 жыл бұрын
He explains very well. Good job, Captain.
@thebomb78 Жыл бұрын
That's actually amazing
@f3nd13y5 жыл бұрын
cool view but it seems like the go pro is blocking the captains pfd..
@MaxPower8885 жыл бұрын
@@schaefferav8r Also, the cockpit of an airliner should be sterile during stages of flight such as landing. No one should be talking about anything except necessary things.
@ChrizRockster5 жыл бұрын
...and therein lies the differences between airlines, their expectations and SOP's.
@0xf7c84 жыл бұрын
@@MaxPower888 they shouldn't be talking about other things than the critical phase of the flight they re currently in. In this case they're actually talking about the flight itself. No problem. Every instructor has to go through this. The camera thing I think the angle of the rear camera makes you think it it obstructing but in fact it's not that much. Anyway, the pilot can remove the camera instantly if needed.
@jesspavlichenko57453 жыл бұрын
@@MaxPower888 This was an entirely sterile cockpit. All conversation was landing related
@rael54697 ай бұрын
The reason why landing in zero visibility is not done is because......you can't see to find the taxiway or the terminal. Airports are not that advanced yet. However.......true zero visibility days are rare in most locations.
@Nobilangelo5 жыл бұрын
There is an old joke about the first flight of a fully automated aircraft. The PA announced: 'Ladies and gentlemen, this is the world's first fully automated aircraft. Every aspect of its operation is automatic and perfect. There is nothing for you to worry about. Nothing can go wrong, nothing can go wrong, nothing can go wrong, nothing can go wrong, nothing can go wrong.....'.
@ZBA14 жыл бұрын
i laughed. thanks for the joke man
@projectskipchumba5362 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for the video
@razijukes94355 жыл бұрын
That landing looks so smooth!!!!! I wanna be a passenger on that flight
@wooden21879 ай бұрын
Should the captains primary flight display have a GoPro blocking his view? (Awesome video btw)
@EatingWaffles Жыл бұрын
thank you, pilots!
@thomasa8075 жыл бұрын
Bahrain is an awesome approach and landing, great airport along the water
@Blackeyemofo3 жыл бұрын
Turn on subtitles and go to 4:00… that’s what she said
@togafly.3 жыл бұрын
Omg lmao 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@erikvanhove92155 жыл бұрын
The technology has gone far! This was a 'nice weather' landing, but can the plane land itself in very gusty conditions? When the airplane has to crab into the (cross)wind(s) ?
@jamesthompson30995 жыл бұрын
No, this is really for low visibility, calm days with extreme fog, haze or smoke. When it gets too turbulent you need to find an alternate if the visibility goes south as well.
@hb13382 жыл бұрын
Autoland works fine in a head wind, but you can't use it with a tail wind, a cross wind or if there is turbulence or gusting, because (unlike a human) it cannot react quickly enough or correctly.
@edwardgeorge48815 жыл бұрын
Excellent video! 🛬 And great music. 🎶
@RLTtizME3 жыл бұрын
Good explanation.
@beaubritton43625 жыл бұрын
I’m curious about moderate to sever turbulence. This is amazing technology.
@a_a72875 жыл бұрын
Beau Britton I'm not a pilot but i think in times of severe turbulence, the atc changes which direction planes should land on the runway. There are two ends of the runway and both can be used for takeoff/landing. ATC will issue the pilots towards the runway in which that wind can favor them. As you know, there are some airports which have runways going towards different directions and ATC could direct them to a runway which won't make the plane go through severe turbulence. I'm sure that autoland can correct the plane as moderate turbulence drifts it off course every now and then but the pilot could also take control at final. I'm not completely sure if this is how it always works though.
@TiJayFLY5 жыл бұрын
The crosswind limit is somewhere around 20kts for autoland IIRC.
@theferrones4 ай бұрын
His landing was smoother than the pilot in Airplane! Easy cheesy . Excellent
@NIKOSAUTOS4 жыл бұрын
Congrats :D The L-1011 Tristar had Autoland capability in the 70's.
@steviegee20114 жыл бұрын
Wow I didn’t know that. I guess this wasn’t as futuristic as they thought.
@HashaunAdderleyOfficial5 жыл бұрын
Brilliant explanation
@1Maverick7474 жыл бұрын
Very nice
@oveazeus13 жыл бұрын
Great video. End music was nice. Who are the artist?
@76notam5 жыл бұрын
good video and explain from the captain ...good job and fly safe :)
@briancrawford69 Жыл бұрын
That's pretty damn impressive what these modern airliners can do
@3x3-x3x-oXo3 жыл бұрын
That's been around for ages, British-made airliners of the 60s had it already (Trident, BAC 1-11). You can imagine why :D
@puschmannn3 жыл бұрын
thanks for uploading this fascinating documentary. please allow me to place a request here, because i hope that many aviation fascinated persons might see it: years ago i stumbled obout an older documentary about autopilots and gyros. they tested the autopilot on a big plane and everything worked perfectly in the beginning. then right before the landing the plane suddenly altered it´s course and they thought the autopilot is broken, but as it turned out the autopilot was correct and just did this maneuver to correct for windspeed, turning of the earth and maybe even other parameters and did find it´s way perfectly to it´s destination. maybe someone has seen this video and kindly posts a link here? i would appreciate that, thanks a lot in advance. i´m going to post this in other videos as well for increasing the chance of positive feedback. thanks again and greetings from austria :)
@justplanes3 жыл бұрын
Hello Markus. I have not seen or heard of that video but if I find it I'll def put a link, sounds interesting, thank you
@TheAatupaatu3 жыл бұрын
Nice video. First part was in a simulator with the gopro at front of PFD. After landing gopro disappears and they are in a real plane.
@Anand-cx8po3 жыл бұрын
Excellent video👍🏻
@contemporaryglassmirror21752 жыл бұрын
Nice
@djmorrylive96784 жыл бұрын
Many thanks for sharing this great flight feature! I agree with the other persons or person that prefers the different forward viewpoint for landing and I thought that the instrument views were a bit fuzzy , well to me anyway Apart from that wonderfull thanks again!
@kenbryant25705 жыл бұрын
That was just too cool. I love it.
@sayeed89883 жыл бұрын
A great respect to the technology
@moriver38575 жыл бұрын
Good video, however, the PAPI explanation is somewhat misleading. PAPI is to be disregarded if the approach profile, glideslope, localized, DME, RadAlt, BaroAlt are all correct. Some approaches even state that the G/S and PAPI may differ. Besides,, if during a real approach to 100 m, the PAPI will not be visible until below the deck. PAPIs and VASIs alike are ref only unless the PF STATES, "going visual" or during a published visual approach and FDs off. Back in the day, we used to routinely hand fly a CAT II approach for real, with FD and no autothrottle. Our aircraft were approved for this, including single engine. It seems we have regress in this area.
@richardwyse781729 күн бұрын
wondering if ILS calibration flights track G/S vs Papi? im sure they dont always track esp close to touchdown. PAPI probaly more precise. but G/s is in control!
@richardwyse781729 күн бұрын
interesting to speculate if an aircraft could be fitted with a PAPI tracker as a backup to the glideslope? lets call it the optical landing system! esp useful if the G/S was notammed off?
@chrismacdonald.62954 жыл бұрын
Beautiful c Thank you.
@marcinna85535 жыл бұрын
Super. One of the best explanations I have seen.
@TIRCQ5 жыл бұрын
Nice, thank you guys :D
@sikakongen5 жыл бұрын
premiere ones again, brilliant...
@crocodiledondii5 жыл бұрын
Wild! To think that the automation can do better than most pilots, regardless og the conditions.
@shaf30065 жыл бұрын
When the weather, wind and traffic are good, and auto landing takes more time than pilots do
@RazvanMaioru4 жыл бұрын
The automation can't do better than most pilots, one of the reasons autoland is mostly just used in bad visibility is because the pilots are trained well enough that manually landing the plane is smoother.
@littlestar57374 жыл бұрын
First time watching this. Cool.
@harpoon_bakery1625 жыл бұрын
Great music at the end. Just excellent!! Who is the musician?
@badis235 жыл бұрын
good job
@ant5963 Жыл бұрын
for most things im against automation because it destroys job markets but in this case i think its a great idea when they are advanced they will eliminate human error be able to react to problems faster
@hexandcube7 ай бұрын
The autopilot is an assistive system that's been around for decades. The purpose of an ILS (Instrument Landing Sysem) is to allow landing in low visibility, when visual landing is not possible. It's not going to replace pilots.
@ant59637 ай бұрын
@@hexandcube i know it wont but at some point using the ai to land will be far safer than doing it them self especialy in very dangerous places like nepal were 1 wrong turn and your going into a mountain.
@riannova5 жыл бұрын
Awsome capt. Love this video
@fanekoman82885 жыл бұрын
outstanding!!!
@wendyraymond17515 жыл бұрын
Always enjoy ur videos thanku x love an god bless
@deeanna84485 жыл бұрын
What happens if there is a last minute wind gust? Can the pilots still make flight control inputs?
@harpoon_bakery1625 жыл бұрын
Yes, they have to be diligent as the pilot said in monitoring, he could have taken over in an instant ... you keep your hand ready to take auto-pilot off, also if you make a large control surface adjustment, auto-pilot will disengage.
@thebomb3635 жыл бұрын
Good vid on auto landing and repeat what others have said shame we didn't have forward view. Maybe do another vid this time with the correct view.
@faisalabdulghafoor43495 жыл бұрын
Nice video
@dropkickmonk3y5 жыл бұрын
Very nice!
@frost_21rr654 жыл бұрын
amazing
@mrsnow614 жыл бұрын
What are the auto land performance for cross-wind landing? How much crabbing can it handle?
@Dolpherinoo4 жыл бұрын
For a 737, up to 20kts of crosswind, pretty sure (if the runway is fully dry)
@PaulRoseGuitar4 жыл бұрын
Magnificent
@I_dont_want_an_at Жыл бұрын
I pretended I was on an cruising Airbus a380 with dead pilots and asked chatgpt4 for help. We crushed it. Here was the method: I was the supervisor in the cockpit. we brought in a smart civil engineer passenger to sit in one pilot chair. we brought in an avid aviation sim player for the second pilot chair. we brought in another sim enthusiast for back up. We had chatgpt4 to get some ideas from. We tuned into the emergency frequency. Chatgpt 4 told us that, and where various buttons were. We got emergency traffic control on the radio and they found a suitable pilot to talk us through the cruise and auto land. we had 2.5 hours till landing in Sydney. We learned the instruments and created an easy to understand written plan of action for our approach and landing. weather was good and the airport and runway were capable of accepting an auto land. We ran through our plan several times before our approach began. We had a system of triple checks for each step. Obviously we made reassuring announcements to the passengers. We couldn't hide it from passengers because it's unethical, and also because we had to search for smart confident technical minded people to come be stand-in pilots. It all went off without a hitch. I think it's more than possible.
@bishopscore5 жыл бұрын
Excellent!
@Mdkhadri584 жыл бұрын
Excellent ILS landing.
@ralfsdiezins1161 Жыл бұрын
How is this full autopilot when you controlled the flaps and the gear?
@ThePilotsLife5 жыл бұрын
Very cool, thanks for sharing!!
@randallcastillo8665 жыл бұрын
Excelente vídeo 👍👍👍
@asm88asm2 жыл бұрын
Why the speed breaks were not fired? Suppose they were armed as I can see. Or not?
@lovesick13515 жыл бұрын
Is it suitable for all conditions and all airports ?
@nikobelic42515 жыл бұрын
Love Sick no
@Zany4God5 жыл бұрын
Miraculous!!! Excellent technology. Amazing. All of the relevant aspects: autothrottle, direction, altitude, course changes, and more. I've tried this in a flight simulator, by practicing in the daytime with all the light I needed and then worked on the same procedure in fog or low hanging clouds. Never did get it right. :-) It is going to save a lot of people's lives. Thanks for posting this vlog.
@PAC93225 жыл бұрын
Nice one... Thanks for sharing 🥂
@malaymalaysian90965 жыл бұрын
No matter how advance the automation is. The pilots must have full control of the airplane in case if the automation goes haywire. I still trust in humans compared to machines or computers, whatever they are.
@CloudDayLight5 жыл бұрын
Agreed in my opinion the technology isn't 100 percent proven
@nikobelic42515 жыл бұрын
CloudDayLight it’s not it does mess up
@dkdanis13402 жыл бұрын
Literally everything is controlled here by computers it's fly by wire. Pilot moves the stick that tells computer and then computer moves hydraulics. Autoland is used in extremely bad weather conditions. When pilots can't land because of fog plane will do it automatically. Autoland is one of the only options for bad visibility landings. It will never go haywire and it absolutely doesn't matter cause whole plane is controlled by computers anyways with lots of redundancy meaning that there's no fail risk.
@hb13382 жыл бұрын
@@dkdanis1340 The computers are all completely useless unless a human being tells them what to do.
@manukalias5 жыл бұрын
Hats off to the captain for being precise and clear, This is a Major breakthrough in aviation industry as this will lead to very least emergencies which sometime happen due to bad weather and landing. Hope this would be adopted by all major Aircraft manufacturers.
@AviationNut5 жыл бұрын
The first ever Autoland performed with passengers on board was in April 1965 on the British built Trident aircraft, since then almost all passenger jets have the Autoland system, it's nothing new the pilot was simply showing how it works.
@michelgardes5 жыл бұрын
This was adopted by all "major aircraft manufacturers" 50 years ago.
@togafly.3 жыл бұрын
Lmao
@mcutchi2 жыл бұрын
You are at least 50 years too late with that comment ...
@rooibok5 жыл бұрын
Great vid 👍
@theferrones5 ай бұрын
Autopilot and auto land make everything so easy. Unless something goes wrong and the pilot is not on his game. Or her game. Depends on how she identifies
@Caduceus05085 жыл бұрын
The L1011 was able to do this many years ago
@fastica5 жыл бұрын
Who said the Airbus were the first one with autoland?
@markofexcellence52095 жыл бұрын
I can’t think of any major airliner in production today by Boeing or Airbus that doesn’t offer the feature, it’s been commonplace for some time. Still neat though
@Caduceus05085 жыл бұрын
@@markofexcellence5209 Guess I forgot I've been here for a while and forgot about "progress". An aside.....Lordstown???
@aerlial3605 жыл бұрын
Almost 50 years ago! Amazing technological marvel and IMO the most beautiful bird!
@markofexcellence52095 жыл бұрын
Vlad Cojocaru I assume you’re referring to my General Motors logo in my picture. I live in Ohio - The closing of the Lordstown plant was a disappointing and bad move on behalf of GM. Not good!
@shaneweightman4 жыл бұрын
When tech goes wrong cheers shane uk 🇬🇧
@emersonguimaraes88115 жыл бұрын
Muito legal ver um pouco através do piloto automático.
@Trevor_Austin2 жыл бұрын
That was not a full CAT III autoland, that was just an autoland where the decision to land was made at approx 200’ AGL. A CAT III landing is when conditions require a decision height less than CAT II (100 feet and less than 200 m RVR).
@peteconrad20772 жыл бұрын
I think he was talking about the aircraft status. The aircraft would have been annunciating Cat 3.
@spadgm5 жыл бұрын
Amazing!
@devarupdutta47322 ай бұрын
I have one question. Why flap is used if auto pilot itself is controling the speed while landing?
@kallek5655Ай бұрын
The autopilot can't extend the flaps and gear, that has to be done by the pilots.
@hitthatrwnoflare96458 ай бұрын
Tried my first cat 3 on vatsim today.. I encountered low wind shear and suffered a tailstrike lol
@edwinstar1005 жыл бұрын
music credits please. love the middle rastern sound, give the musicians credit and allow us to purchase and support them.... Unless you are violating copy write.
@adam6325 жыл бұрын
4:01 set subtitles on XD
@shodancat10005 жыл бұрын
hahah
@SvenRognelund4 жыл бұрын
Rofl
@DartzIRL2 жыл бұрын
Leave a card in the Cockpit. "In the event of crew incapacitation - push the following buttons and sit back". You will get on the ground
@hamzabegic96125 жыл бұрын
Butter landing
@faridghar8 ай бұрын
Isn't the GoPro blocking the pilot's view of the PFD?
@Cappadoccia045 жыл бұрын
I thought it was a simulation at first but the ending seems to have proved me wrong.
@0xf7c84 жыл бұрын
It's a simulation called The Matrix
@xmodmodifier4 жыл бұрын
I was convinced they are a simulator until they parked and the people outside were waiting for them