Never seen someone have so calmly go through Senate questioning...wow.
@wyunaboy3 жыл бұрын
Because she is talking to bunch of democrat idiots.
@dbergerac96323 жыл бұрын
She spends a normal workday listening to BS arguments and nonsense from one side or the other. It was just another week to her.
@askip93043 жыл бұрын
@Ladybug Turtle what have you done in life lol?
@fluffiiesnutz3 жыл бұрын
@Ladybug Turtle like Biden won't answer on packing the court. He stated we should elect him and find out.
@audiomenace013 жыл бұрын
@Ladybug Turtle Answer that question yourself and show me where in the constitution was it said or written. Can you give a straight and definite answer? DOES SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE SHOW UP ANYWHERE IN THE CONSTITUTION. Oh lemme guess you don't know what is all in the constitution? The constitutional basis of the Social Security Act was uncertain PERIOD. THIS IS ALL DEMOCRAT BS.
@jameskallely97763 жыл бұрын
This video left out a "top moment" when she was asked if she was reading from notes.
@heatherofcrunchyleaves15193 жыл бұрын
Yup
@ML-vj1vk3 жыл бұрын
That was super impressive!!!
@harperkodicek73453 жыл бұрын
@Denise Ledford maybe if she had them she would have remembered the rights of the first amendment !
@faisalihsan78263 жыл бұрын
These hearings are weird sometimes because its people who are obviously less intelligent trying to catch out a smarter person
@peachion23 жыл бұрын
@Denise Ledford yeah, couldn’t remember what was the law. Bad sign. Most of us know the first amendment without notes. She doesn’t?
@Goatman4803 жыл бұрын
Kamala Harris had a 2 minute clip, and managed to make it the stupidest clip in the whole video. I am just baffled about how condescending she is, and I have a lot of respect for Amy, just based on how she did in this hearing.
@johnyjo39733 жыл бұрын
Judge Barret totally slammed Senator Harris in that clip, Harris had a bad line of argumentation and she was totally called out. Sen. Harris trying to come off of it saying "So you've agreed it's a debatable issue" was almost laughable, of course it is. I think climate change is a problem, but it's obviously very political and nowhere near the level of the previous questions.
@lornakim50083 жыл бұрын
Jamal Trulove & Others are online + via KZbin.com & not once has Senator Harris Publicly said she's Sorry as made Mistakes like Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, John McCain, Ron Wyden & Others including Tulsi Gabbard & President Obama & JFK & Eishenhower would have & did💖
@Goatman4803 жыл бұрын
@@johnyjo3973 The thing that was most annoying to me is she was tying to make it sound like they were the same thing to draw out an answer for a totally unrelated topic. She is free to ask a question, but don't have a smug self righteous smirk on your face the whole time while you are trying to speak about real issues. It comes off as disingenuous and rude. It also showed she thought that it was funny. It was like when a kid pulls a childish prank, and they sit there talking to the person they pranked snickering the whole time. She not only shows she doesn't care, but that she is a child. People are free to vote for Biden and Harris. It is there right, but to ignore these signs will ruin this country if it happens. I really urge people to open their eyes. It's like an endless loop of people only hearing and not listening, while walking in the dark.
@wyunaboy3 жыл бұрын
And people still want kamala to be their VP..
@deb33763 жыл бұрын
@@wyunaboy who will wind up president if biden is elected
@eric_hates_the_poor3 жыл бұрын
When someone is literally smarter than everyone for miles.
@stingyfortnite31833 жыл бұрын
*By miles away
@Bruvafrmanothermotha3 жыл бұрын
No she has no deep intellect, nor does it seem so. However she has very great skill of communicating without substance.. Deflection is an art more so than a product of brilliance.
@markarament67763 жыл бұрын
@@Bruvafrmanothermotha If you only had ten percent of her intellect, you would most likely shut-the-hell up. But dumb and ignorant as you are, like most of those Democratic morons in the Senate, you just can not resist but to open your mouth.
@tonys.50293 жыл бұрын
Sid H She explained why she couldn’t answer the questions she wasn’t allowed to answer. Plain and simple. A justice cannot be nominated because they gave a forecast of their decisions - that’s incredibly corrupt to do so and there are specific laws to prevent the justice from giving a forecast or a promise of a set outcome. Sadly, the senators only seemed particularly interested in asking those kinds of questions as opposed to asking about her prior decisions and the reasoning behind them or her judicial philosophy. Basically, rather than respect the law as the philosophy it is, the senators attempted to defame law and drag it into party politics, hence why ACB was unable to answer many questions.
@Bruvafrmanothermotha3 жыл бұрын
@@markarament6776 i respect her for her acomplishments and character. I am just saying this video does not sign towards any deep intellect of creativity. Like Elon or Tesla himself. She comes of to me like a person able to play 3d chess. I dont know if thats what i want on the court. RBG was a visionary.
@sarrahajjaj3 жыл бұрын
She’s exceptionally impressive.
@nicolebrown27273 жыл бұрын
I like her!!! And, throughout law school,.I usually did not like conservative SCOTUS Justices.
@mflo63653 жыл бұрын
@@JohnVJay so its intelligent to be against LGBTQ marriage?
@thutranchannel15513 жыл бұрын
@@mflo6365 It's not intelligent to ask unintelligent questions as yours.
@mflo63653 жыл бұрын
@@thutranchannel1551 great. Why dont you learn how to speak with facts and have a normal discussion instead of insulting. I think that speaks more about you than it does about me
@mflo63653 жыл бұрын
@@JohnVJay true
@thatonekid4073 жыл бұрын
Harris: "Do you believe in life after love"
@PracticaProphetica3 жыл бұрын
Judge: "Yes, it's in the constitution. The unalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness..."
@astelbele3 жыл бұрын
Gee .. I got you babe..Babe..I got..
@fambrown42503 жыл бұрын
Acb: if you’re a liberal Democrat the chances of it happening is 9 months. 😂
@angela17083 жыл бұрын
i don’t need your sympathy
@astelbele3 жыл бұрын
@@angela1708 WHAT SYMPATHY??? WHAT ARE YOU REFERING TO..SORRY I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT POINT YOU ARE TRYJNG TO MAKE...
@joesmoe69473 жыл бұрын
“Do you believe that 1 + 1 = 2?” “Do you believe that the sky is blue?” “Do you believe that Orange man bad?”
@jonathancummings64003 жыл бұрын
Nope, for me he's been very good. I now earn more than thrice what I earned in November 2016 when he was elected. His economy made me flourish as never before, I would be a fool to betray him now!
@joesmoe69473 жыл бұрын
@@jonathancummings6400 I’m simply boiling down what the Dems did here (You probably realize that.) Very VERY immature and stupid way of conducting ones self. “Leading the witness/Leading Question” as they call it in legal terms. Cannot believe Kamala who CLEARLY read word for word off of a script (which she either wrote herself or had someone else give it to her to say.) I mean she didn’t even take the time to memorize it to try to look somewhat genuine. 😂 It wasn’t much at all. Either way, Kamala was an absolute MORON for saying it to a woman who clearly knows the law like the back of her hand. She didn’t even deliver it well either! You could hear the tone in her voice clearly jumping ahead of herself to the question which she was attempting to “lead” her to. Cannot believe that’s all they could come up with 😂. Then again am I really surprised? No. They’ve shot themselves in the feet one too many thousand times. I’m calling a landslide victory.
@jogrobler3 жыл бұрын
@@joesmoe6947 Well spotted mate! She's creating a false equivalence with her arguments, same as Klobuchar tried to compare Roe v Wade to Brown v Board. She lists a long list of statements that are widely accepted without dissent, to which ACB will obviously answer "I agree" and then throws in the much more controversial topic in the same category of questions, as if to say "We all agree on this statement except for you, and that's why you shouldn't be on the SCOTUS"
@lonestarJimbo3 жыл бұрын
Lol
@jity1003 жыл бұрын
@@jonathancummings6400 Amen!
@robertsevers62513 жыл бұрын
When ignorance questions intelligence, intelligence will always win. Even when ignorance doesn't understand it has been defeated. That's why it is said that ignorance is bliss.
@sarahpresnell35093 жыл бұрын
periodt
@peanut9243 жыл бұрын
Hahaha I love it!
@zpaztrik14183 жыл бұрын
Ignorance is bliss until life hits you
@edopelawi3 жыл бұрын
Aptly said, Sir.
@tommiedeitering70282 жыл бұрын
I saw no ignorance I. Any of the questions.
@maplemumbai3 жыл бұрын
She is brilliant, liberals will dislike her cause she is a Judge and not an activist.
@renekostolnik57093 жыл бұрын
She is an activist. For corporate donors. You fool www.goiam.org/news/supreme-court-nominee-has-troubling-track-record/
@violetfairies3 жыл бұрын
Lol, she's for corporate America, an activist, and has been working against workers interest for years. How do you not know this?
@had06293 жыл бұрын
@@violetfairies CNN tell you this?
@violetfairies3 жыл бұрын
@@had0629 CNN is not news. No.
@shadetreader3 жыл бұрын
She doesn't even know what the 1st Amendment says. Yet Trump cultists like you obediently worship her anyway.
@xhobbesx3 жыл бұрын
i actually expected a religious fanatic but acb is really quite smart and articulate. I suppose she should be as a judge.
@JAF29913 жыл бұрын
That's why you shouldn't believe the media narrative and take it as gospel, but rather research and see things for yourself.
@xhobbesx3 жыл бұрын
@@JAF2991 of course. Always an agenda
@Ericairline3 жыл бұрын
That’s how sociopaths work.
@mariad72623 жыл бұрын
@@JAF2991 but don’t we all fall victim to doing that? I’m sure you think bc I’m a democrat that I condone all the things they do? We all have bias all I can say is I don’t see her being misleading I don’t see the problem
@AZ-ts1qy3 жыл бұрын
She is actually very biased and vastly by her denial of science which is influenced by her religious beliefs.
@Scheibei3 жыл бұрын
It truly touched my heart and my soul the moment when Judge Barrett's blind former student talked about Judge Barrett's kindness and patience helping her-a completely blind student achieve her lifelong dream of becoming a lawyer. Judge Barrett's immense kindness and passion speak for herself. Also, Judge Barrett had 5 kids of her own but still had extra love to adopt not one but 2 unfortunate children, and gave them a happy family. President Trump has never disappointed in us when choosing Judge Barrett to fill the SCOTUS seat. No one but Judge Barrett is best fit for the job. She is the one.
@leximccarthy9223 жыл бұрын
Besides the fact she wants to take away simple human rights and actually Judge Barrett could not even give us the first 5 amendments but go off!
@Skeezik19983 жыл бұрын
@@leximccarthy922 Tell me what basic human rights she wants to take away. I'm not saying you're wrong, I just want specific examples of when ACB said she would try to take certain rights away.
@Skeezik19983 жыл бұрын
@charlir wood Exactly
@wpb13952 жыл бұрын
She's also a member of a crazy religious cult with weird things going on with children. So there is that.
@ericnelson91002 жыл бұрын
Isn't that her job, what is so special about helping a blind student get her special needs equipment?
@billcarr53063 жыл бұрын
She is so smart she is great.
@dukeon3 жыл бұрын
I guess you’re easily impressed.
@clay___doh3 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/qWe8f6NqbJqEa7M
@deborahfalzone9363 жыл бұрын
Boom! And that is Amy Coney Barrett. She is amazing. I think she made 99.9% of these Senators look like bumbling fools.
@dbergerac96323 жыл бұрын
They did that on their own. She just made no effort to protect them from themselves.
@breylankemp75963 жыл бұрын
@Ladybug Turtle lol your reaching
@georgecollins93883 жыл бұрын
At least.
@had06293 жыл бұрын
@Ladybug Turtle those dumb questions were all democrats btw.
@wendypena6013 жыл бұрын
Smart person she don’t needs notes 😂 i did like that answers!
@a-droid7813 жыл бұрын
"How many fingers a normal human has on their left hand?" "Followup question - and number of fingers on their right hand?"
@CheeKiatTeo3 жыл бұрын
She is an outstanding pick. Clear in her thoughts and calm in expressing them. I have not sure why Democrats hate her?
@aaronmontgomery20553 жыл бұрын
bias.
@16semiquavers3 жыл бұрын
@Denise Ledford Biden, Pelosi, and most of the Supreme Court are all Catholics too
@clay___doh3 жыл бұрын
Well she “forgot” the 5 overarching components of the first amendment lol. She took money from a hate group yet is up for Supreme Court justice. She won’t answer when questioned about her stance on women’s rights.
@jorsehph92163 жыл бұрын
@@clay___doh Can you cite some sources for these claims? Thanks. :D
@clay___doh3 жыл бұрын
@@jorsehph9216 Would love to. Here she is embarrassing herself live. If you don’t know the FIRST amendment in no circumstance do you belong on the Supreme Court. kzbin.info/www/bejne/qWe8f6NqbJqEa7M
@YurLord3 жыл бұрын
ACB is America's mom. Love her.
@renekostolnik57093 жыл бұрын
She doesn't care about you and will steal your healthcare and basic labour rights.
@chysel48603 жыл бұрын
@May Ling Yeah based on how she has voted in the past and also the idiot that nominated her.
@jonathancummings64003 жыл бұрын
@@renekostolnik5709 Nope, the Constitution will do that because the solutions the social justice champions chose to create those were in conflict with it. Therefore, to agree with the design of the USA, they must be undone apparently. Obamacare is clearly Unconstitutional, so are labor laws, the government wasn't EVER supposed to interfere with either the Healthcare industry or the private sector to that degree. So unfortunately, such solutions are easily undone with strict adherence to the Constitution. It's the way the USA was designed to operate!
@VillageDigby3 жыл бұрын
More like America’s KAREN
@renekostolnik57093 жыл бұрын
@May Ling She is very open with her opinion. I don't have to guess. You are a fool if you believe she's anything but a tool for corporate donors.
@432hecnsketch3 жыл бұрын
This lady is presidential material!.
@chrish98523 жыл бұрын
yeah--in some religious totalitarian state she would be
@sung-hopark5193 жыл бұрын
Nah. She is supreme court justice material
@sung-hopark5193 жыл бұрын
@@chrish9852 please do explain
@albertobutacan17653 жыл бұрын
Yes truly is . It's the first time I saw her in you tube I don't even know her as handpick of president trump. Her composure , intelligence , brilliance shines . She will be a good pressidentiable million times greater than Hillary clinton
@Izzy-bq1rc3 жыл бұрын
Can’t be now. Supreme Court justices serve for life. And requirements for those two are very different. SCOTUS requires someone extremely well read, intelligent, and with a lot of respect for the law. The president needs to be very good at playing politics
@TinfoilHatWearer3 жыл бұрын
Straight up the most professional person I have ever seen... Period. No if ands or buts about it. END OF STORY.
@askip93043 жыл бұрын
@Ladybug Turtle but the prison wouldn't be liable in that situation. that wouldn't make any sense that's on the guard, not the prison Are you listening to yourself ? lol
@askip93043 жыл бұрын
@Ladybug Turtle you're comment makes very little sense, conflicting statements lol
@liftingisfun23503 жыл бұрын
I cringe when I see people end their opinion statements with that tag line, as if the opinion becomes cemented into fact even without one premise to uphold it
@Ashley-sk3kd3 жыл бұрын
@@askip9304 on the guard... who represents the prison they work at. If a worker sexually assaults someone on work time both the establishment and the worker should be held accountable. They are responsible for the people they hire. It makes a lot of sense if you actually think about it.
@CookieRaider19903 жыл бұрын
She is a threat to their corruption. That is why they hate her
@clay___doh3 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/qWe8f6NqbJqEa7M
@jocelynyared21503 жыл бұрын
She can't be bullied! That's for sure...
@olivermay7893 жыл бұрын
We should always pray for our country all is good to be good Jocelyn
@antoniosaxon86052 жыл бұрын
ZZZZZZZ TROLL
@IvanPlayStation4LiFe3 жыл бұрын
Amy Coney Barret is a boss. The best Supreme Court Judge chosen by the best President Donald John Trump. Trump 2020 🇺🇲❤💙🤍🇺🇲
@vsw373 жыл бұрын
Just imagine being in a classroom setting and learning from Mrs. Barrett. What a privilege her law students had.
@renekostolnik57093 жыл бұрын
There would only be 1 lesson. Listen to corporate donors. www.goiam.org/news/supreme-court-nominee-has-troubling-track-record/
@MathieuLLF3 жыл бұрын
@Annie Awesome you realize that Amy is Catholic and Catholics are STRONG believers in science and have brought lots to the science community right?
@16semiquavers3 жыл бұрын
#NotAllCatholics
@halilceyhan7023 жыл бұрын
U overrating her, she just answered questions neutral. Thats it
@Skeezik19983 жыл бұрын
@@halilceyhan702 Because laws are neutral. She was nominated for a position to uphold laws. She answered neutral specifically because as a judge on the highest courts in our country it is her duty and responsibility to uphold the laws as written. Be honest, if you were to appear before a court, would you want to face a judge who makes their decision off of personal opinion rather than the law?
@SimonCamilleri3 жыл бұрын
THAT is your list of "best moments"?? Nothing about her as a judge, her legal philosophy, her attitude to the constitution. Just a line of mostly Democrats bating her to respond to political issues. Such poor journalism.
@runnerrn22473 жыл бұрын
And she still crushed them
@nicholasmcpike45973 жыл бұрын
Question: Do you know what "status of the law" means? When a name is spelled in all capitals it represents a corporation not a man or woman. Why is your name spelled in all CAPITALS on your id and birth certificate? A corporation is not living and need a living being to control it as defined by the court ( I think make sure and research self I could be mistaking the word play ) A Judges hidden job defintion is to transfer property back to the owner. But the owners of the corporations don't need or want to handle their corporations when they get into trouble so they hire judges. The owners of the corporations setup punishment and fines ( how can a owner collect money from their corporations when it gets into trouble? ) It's in the hidden word play That they dont teach you Ever wonder why only attorneys/lawyers and people who work for the government know the languages that govern you? There is written and verbal law that you will never know unless you become a worker or fight to find the truth and find out on your own. I think it's time for the people to take back control of their lives and world together but also individually. The .......
@nicholasmcpike45973 жыл бұрын
@Rich B Do know what a Judges one responsibility is? To return property back to the owner. Question: Do you know what "status of the law" means? When a name is spelled in all capitals it represents a corporation not a man or woman. Why is your name spelled in all CAPITALS on your id and birth certificate? A corporation is not living and need a living being to control it as defined by the court ( I think make sure and research self I could be mistaking the word play ) A Judges hidden job defintion is to transfer property back to the owner. But the owners of the corporations don't need or want to handle their corporations when they get into trouble so they hire judges. The owners of the corporations setup punishment and fines ( how can a owner collect money from their corporations when it gets into trouble? ) It's in the hidden word play That they dont teach you Ever wonder why only attorneys/lawyers and people who work for the government know the languages that govern you? There is written and verbal law that you will never know unless you become a worker or fight to find the truth and find out on your own. I think it's time for the people to take back control of their lives and world together but also individually. The
@mogtrader83 жыл бұрын
She's really fitting to be nominated. What people don't understand is that this is a life long commitment. From what she's explained and said, she will not allow outside factors affect her judgment & interpretation of the law.
@renekostolnik57093 жыл бұрын
She will allow corporate donors (who brought her to nomination) to affect her decisions. Or literally write them for her. www.goiam.org/news/supreme-court-nominee-has-troubling-track-record/
@tomelder23583 жыл бұрын
@@renekostolnik5709 Evidence for that statement please?
@sarahstephan51803 жыл бұрын
@@renekostolnik5709 If I were you, I would look at more credible news sources for this kind of accusation. That article is basically an opinion and barely gives any evidence.
@nickparr17203 жыл бұрын
outside factors?? I would consider the bible an outside factor.
@Skeezik19983 жыл бұрын
@@renekostolnik5709 I just watched your link, and it isn't good.
@mariad72623 жыл бұрын
As a democrat I do not endorse Kamila Harris I don’t think this woman is evil, asking her such foolish questioned wasn’t a good look. So tired of this division
@thepetersong3 жыл бұрын
So climate change is “debate?”
@Darsam883 жыл бұрын
@@thepetersong No, the amount of impact Humans are having is the debate. And asking a judge to just answer yes or no to a field she has not had a case in is a bad look.
@thepetersong3 жыл бұрын
@@Darsam88 lol if you don’t think humans are causing climate change then you’re either brain dead or just don’t believe in science
@Darsam883 жыл бұрын
@@thepetersong You are brain dead or just can't read, because i didn't dispute that humans don't affect climate change. what I said was "the amount of impact Humans are having is the debate". The reason that is the debate is because there were similar levels of warming before the 1st Ice Age. There have been multiple Scientists that have done studies showing man made effects on climate change have only affected regular climate change by a couple %. am I saying I agree with them, no, but there is information out there showing it's not just as simple as people are making it out to be.
@dbergerac96323 жыл бұрын
The Democrats and Republicans MOSTLY agree on most problems and many solutions. It's just a shame that the Democrats stopped speaking to the Republicans. I do not blame the origins of that solely on the Democrats, just it's persistence.
@utefan77183 жыл бұрын
I believe ACB will be one of the greatest justice's ever appointed to the SCOTUS. She should have been selected last time!!
@dhruvchadha20693 жыл бұрын
I feel she's Scalia's true successor. Hope she learns to write "zingers" as well him too!
@robertevras65773 жыл бұрын
She did an amazing job of handling a bunch of total TROLES! Wow, I am even more impressed now than I ever was before! Great job & can’t wait to have her as a Justice!
@alexnowicki2863 жыл бұрын
Democrats: Do you believe in Santa Claus?
@Esmerelda-rm6qj3 жыл бұрын
So you're saying smoking is like Santa Claus, aka not real? Covid? Climate change?
@unbearablepun86083 жыл бұрын
Cindy Stewart what r u on about. The point was they are asking dumb and obvious questions.
@bryangonzaleztorres91883 жыл бұрын
@@Esmerelda-rm6qj he saying that the questions that were asked were obvious. Of course the virus is contagious and smoking causes cancer. These are not debatable. Yet they ask her those questions as if they expect her to say otherwise
@Esmerelda-rm6qj3 жыл бұрын
@@bryangonzaleztorres9188 Did you not understand it was to compare those two subjects with climate change, because climate change is fact. It's not debatable like ACB said it is. Smh!
@Esmerelda-rm6qj3 жыл бұрын
@@unbearablepun8608 if they were obvious then why didn't ACB assert that climate change is a fact?
@jessimoleapen74713 жыл бұрын
Kamala doesn't even deserve to talk to this gentle woman, Amy
@georgecollins93883 жыл бұрын
Really completely true. Soon Amy won't have to deal with these diseased vultures.
@johnmudrak26653 жыл бұрын
She is brilliant.
@dallashill233 жыл бұрын
@Bubble O Bill stfu
@laurakuzma56573 жыл бұрын
Yeah too bad she uses it the wrong way.
@ethanlantz93203 жыл бұрын
Oh my God I really do not like Senator Harris. She's so unlikable.
@ackc12043 жыл бұрын
I would say she answered very well.
@tillitsdone3 жыл бұрын
I don't know.........I can't answer that...........it wouldn't be fair......
@my_name_is_brandon..letsgo11323 жыл бұрын
What a smart person she is, ACB is a great pick, even the biased media can't make her look bad. Well done Amy congratulations 👏🏾👍🏾
@laurakuzma56573 жыл бұрын
Yeah if we could we would see that she would rule with extreme bias. She's an extreme nut
@my_name_is_brandon..letsgo11323 жыл бұрын
@@laurakuzma5657 first off she's 1 of 9 on the Supreme Court so she wouldn't rules anything and just because she has different views than you dosen't make her a nut this lady is a genius and people are intimidated by her intelligence
@renekostolnik57093 жыл бұрын
She's not a genius. She is nuts and an extreme outlier. She is highly unqualified for a supreme court position. Period.
@my_name_is_brandon..letsgo11323 жыл бұрын
@@renekostolnik5709 reason being?
@snapdrag1413 жыл бұрын
These were not the only highlights. This woman hand packed a lunch for everyone in that court room and hauled all those mushy brains to school
@nicholasmcpike45973 жыл бұрын
Question: Do you know what "status of the law" means? When a name is spelled in all capitals it represents a corporation not a man or woman. Why is your name spelled in all CAPITALS on your id and birth certificate? A corporation is not living and need a living being to control it as defined by the court ( I think make sure and research self I could be mistaking the word play ) A Judges hidden job defintion is to transfer property back to the owner. But the owners of the corporations don't need or want to handle their corporations when they get into trouble so they hire judges. The owners of the corporations setup punishment and fines ( how can a owner collect money from their corporations when it gets into trouble? ) It's in the hidden word play That they dont teach you Ever wonder why only attorneys/lawyers and people who work for the government know the languages that govern you? There is written and verbal law that you will never know unless you become a worker or fight to find the truth and find out on your own. I think it's time for the people to take back control of their lives and world together but also individually. The
@domingomelchor49023 жыл бұрын
Are you saying she is the second coming of Phyllis Schlafly? Maybe. She is nowhere near being an activist. If you were schooled by here knowledge of the law, it's not because of a homemade loaf of bread. She will have a different role: to uphold the Constitution and the laws of the land just like that statue with a blindfold and a balance on her hand.
@snapdrag1413 жыл бұрын
@@domingomelchor4902 mmk, well these people didn't actually expect her to give any kind of political responses. They certainly tried to manipulate her into giving a response they were hoping for, but her obviously well compartmentalized mind was unphased.
@ramlin353 жыл бұрын
You mean where the Democrat Senators embarrass themselves by posturing for the cameras?
@Timothy_Cotham3 жыл бұрын
Barrett totally schooled the democrats. I don't know why they want to keep punishing themselves, but I always enjoy watching them expose their stupidity.
@aXemRanger13 жыл бұрын
Kamala Harris has made nation-wide news as a Senator on two occasions, both being the nominations of Supreme Court justices. Her approach in both hearings has been to speak to the nominee in a condescending and interrupting manner (she thinks she's establishing dominance) and demanding "Yes or No" answers to incredibly loaded questions. Harris's lack of... ability... is demonstrated by her tendency to revert to abrubtly interrupting
@pault40043 жыл бұрын
It's her job. A job you couldn't do on your best day. You are a grotesque symbol of racism.
@Mizerableklaha3 жыл бұрын
@@pault4004 can't argue against what he wrote so you pull out the racist card, you are beyond pathetic
@aXemRanger13 жыл бұрын
@@pault4004 Grotesque symbol of racism? What did I say that was racist? Or are you just a dim-witted bum who can't actually think for yourself and "racism!" is your default "argument"?
@clarkevander3 жыл бұрын
As a foreigner, I don't understand either the question of Harris lol. Like wtf is that. "Do you believe in science?"
@bennguyen78273 жыл бұрын
Harris is just an evil period
@bennguyen78273 жыл бұрын
@Gina R you are just like harris and the rest of the evil Dems - full of hatred, lying all the time and do nothing except for corrupt and harming your country
@clarkevander3 жыл бұрын
Y'all think either of these party think about your well beings lol. They don't. Side with your country, not a party.
@idahopotato67513 жыл бұрын
Democrats have met their match here. ACB doesn't talk off the cuff and without reason. She is a very impressive speaker and her comments are thought based. Kamala Harris looked like a rube here. As did Klobuchar.
@sejrec563 жыл бұрын
I’m actually surprised as how open this post was coming from NBC. Kudos! Even though I usually despise your bias, there wasn’t much bias except for the questions you chose to present here for Barrett to answer. Maybe your point was to infer something negative about Barrett or the President, but it only solidified my agreement w Barrett for this position!
@laurakuzma56573 жыл бұрын
She wouldn't answer anything. We all know her mind is closed.
@thegr813373 жыл бұрын
@@laurakuzma5657 She didn't answer anything because of a thing called the Ginsburg Rule. It was a rule that was created by Democrats during RBG's confirmation saying that a nominee can not be forced to give opinions on cases or topics that are not already settled by the court. As a bonus, the Democrat that pushed the Ginsburg rule was former VP (at the time Senator) Joe Biden. She isn't closed-minded, she was following the rules of the committee.
@docmacdvet3 жыл бұрын
Her mind is not closed. She as a justice nominee would rather opine in terms of meaningful judicial deliberations not as a constipated intellectual, or a judicial pundit!
@dukeon3 жыл бұрын
“Bias” ...when you are probably used to watching the Fox Propaganda channel. Gtfo. People remarking how smart and qualified Judge Barrett must be not be too bright themselves. She said nothing about anything to indicate what kind of a judge she would be, so there’s no way you could agree or disagree with her views or her qualifications. But as noted by others on this thread, *This standard practice for a nominee* so I’m no criticizing her for it at all. I’m laughing at the know-nothings in the general comment sections of these videos who say the senators are asking dumb questions and she’s making them all look stupid. Most people have no clue what they’re watching and it’s hilarious. I’ve seen a ton of these confirmation hearings. The senators know she’s not going to answer their questions in any direct sort of way; instead they’re putting statements in the record and also getting her responses recorded as a baseline. They know she’ll be confirmed. This is a game being played and 90% or more of the viewers don’t understand what’s actually going on. Ever watch a long, long legal case unfold over months or even years? IRL not on TV. Then you’d know nothing interesting happens for a long time, it’s mostly procedural. But little things happen. Attorneys are subtly getting a feel for the defendant, plaintiff, judge, the other attorney(s), jury if applicable, the case... and so on. It doesn’t happen in the space of a KZbin video. [As for NBC - not MSNBC - it’s one of the most reliable and least biased news sources out there: www.adfontesmedia.com/?v=402f03a963ba ]. Unbiased doesn’t mean splitting the difference, though. If there’s a turd on the sidewalk, a good news source should report the turd and not speculate too much about how it got there or why. But if half the people watching believe that turds are actually magic rocks, they shouldn’t give those people equal time and refer to it as a magic rock as well as a turd, because those people are *wrong.* News is meant to report facts. Editorials or opinion pieces should be clearly labeled as such and represents one person’s subject views. American media tends to editorialize WAY too much on both ends of the political spectrum in order to ingratiate itself to its target audience. Facts are often reported wrapped in a big dose of opinion. On the Right, facts are often misreported deliberately or “news” that doesn’t even pass the sniff test for most tabloids is presented as though it is verified fact, but only if it serves the conservative agenda. If it doesn’t, it could be an event witnessed by thousands of people and proven beyond a reasonable doubt by multiple credible sources, and the “News” source will bury it below some unimportant stories or else they will spin the hell out of it and make it seem to mean the opposite of what it actually does, and their audience won’t question the completely bogus take because they’re gullible morons who only get their news from that one source and are allergic to fact-checking anything.
@lannisterfilth3 жыл бұрын
@@laurakuzma5657 Don't be shy Laura, respond.
@NoWay-pe5mm3 жыл бұрын
Watch how dumb senators are while they try to berate a person who is measurably smarter than them.
@jimbo86513 жыл бұрын
Is this the woman who doesn't know the five freedoms of the 1st amendment
@nicholasmcpike45973 жыл бұрын
@@jimbo8651 Question: Do you know what "status of the law" means? When a name is spelled in all capitals it represents a corporation not a man or woman. Why is your name spelled in all CAPITALS on your id and birth certificate? A corporation is not living and need a living being to control it as defined by the court ( I think make sure and research self I could be mistaking the word play ) A Judges hidden job defintion is to transfer property back to the owner. But the owners of the corporations don't need or want to handle their corporations when they get into trouble so they hire judges. The owners of the corporations setup punishment and fines ( how can a owner collect money from their corporations when it gets into trouble? ) It's in the hidden word play That they dont teach you Ever wonder why only attorneys/lawyers and people who work for the government know the languages that govern you? There is written and verbal law that you will never know unless you become a worker or fight to find the truth and find out on your own. I think it's time for the people to take back control of their lives and world together but also individually. The
@tbalonzo3 жыл бұрын
She is a smart, witty, intelligent woman judge
@thatrandomvideoguy983 жыл бұрын
@JDMime i mean if simple means stupid, then yes. She won't answer simple questions
@tillitsdone3 жыл бұрын
Another Trump stooge, not qualified.
@joshuawilliams88413 жыл бұрын
This is the kind of mentality not just our Supreme Justices need, but also our regular federal and state justices. I applaud Mrs. Barret for her commitment to remain apolitical and unvocal towards her personal political views to further confirm this conception that justices must be open minded and without motivation of any particular political bias. Good work Justice. I hope you are confirmed soon.
@brokenwizards91223 жыл бұрын
ACB seems to be the smartest person in the room.
@BboyBabyCAkes3 жыл бұрын
She's very smart with her responses in being able to foresee the direct intent of a series of questions & professionally stating reasoning as to not providing a clear cut answer lol
@lanajohnson74013 жыл бұрын
A lot of those questions are trying to bait her into political discourse. Her job is to look at a case thoroughly from a legal lense and then make a ruling.
@nicholasmcpike45973 жыл бұрын
@@lanajohnson7401 Question: Do you know what "status of the law" means? When a name is spelled in all capitals it represents a corporation not a man or woman. Why is your name spelled in all CAPITALS on your id and birth certificate? A corporation is not living and need a living being to control it as defined by the court ( I think make sure and research self I could be mistaking the word play ) A Judges hidden job defintion is to transfer property back to the owner. But the owners of the corporations don't need or want to handle their corporations when they get into trouble so they hire judges. The owners of the corporations setup punishment and fines ( how can a owner collect money from their corporations when it gets into trouble? ) It's in the hidden word play That they dont teach you Ever wonder why only attorneys/lawyers and people who work for the government know the languages that govern you? There is written and verbal law that you will never know unless you become a worker or fight to find the truth and find out on your own. I think it's time for the people to take back control of their lives and world together but also individually. The
@HockeyxLlama3 жыл бұрын
@J L she devoted her life to law and all you see is the negatives because you are liberal
@HockeyxLlama3 жыл бұрын
@J L Being born rich shouldn’t invalidate her opinions. Also Trump is not intimidating voters... please explain.
@HockeyxLlama3 жыл бұрын
@J L I’m not voting for Trump this year I just like Amy Coney Barrett. You still haven’t answered my question. Also, stop saying the phrase kiss ass, it shows your clear bias
@irinak56743 жыл бұрын
She answers like a real lawyer: "it depends.." 🙂
@yesifixthings78673 жыл бұрын
I liked kamalas questions, lol. Some real grade school tactics there. Don't let her do any business deals for me.
@o_bomb25883 жыл бұрын
Kamala: gives yes or no questions based on literal fact Amy Coney Barrett: well, um, senator, you see, um...
@yesifixthings78673 жыл бұрын
If they're facts then why ask them? Yes senator... smoking are bad 4 u. Its persuasive leading into a debate.
@o_bomb25883 жыл бұрын
@@yesifixthings7867 to make sure she understands basic science/logic. ACB couldn’t even name all 5 rights granted by the first amendment.
@yesifixthings78673 жыл бұрын
Yes humans can't be infoulable. But if thats the worst thing that can be identified after 3 days of hearing amongst some of the most unusual questioning ever heard at a confirmation hearing she has shown the least bias of anyone. If anyone else, let's say biden was interviewed for 3 days im sure the amount of non perfect statements would be laughable.
@willcourtneyspanish3 жыл бұрын
@@yesifixthings7867 She's asking the questions to emphasize the fact that when she asks about climate change (WHICH IS ALSO AN UNDENIABLE FACT) ACB refuses to answer the question as if its something that is up for debate. Clearly she thinks it is. That was the point Kamala was trying to make.
@cuthbertsboots57333 жыл бұрын
"Judge Barret, what is the wind speed velocity of an unladen swallow?"
@partickaljamested51463 жыл бұрын
an african or a european swallow...?
@Quis_ut_Deus3 жыл бұрын
@@partickaljamested5146 I do know that !?
@angelapower95703 жыл бұрын
Wow she is amazing!
@MikeB-jz5mh3 жыл бұрын
Perhaps a better title would’ve been “Dems trying to bait ACB, but she stays classy and judicial.”
@lolacook59053 жыл бұрын
She's a beautiful soul. An so smart.
@nicoles_handle3 жыл бұрын
why are people against her? what's the context? just bias?
@aaronmontgomery20553 жыл бұрын
pure bias. She is the perfect judge. Outside of the party system and believes in the judicial branch.
@turtleflegel68163 жыл бұрын
Google her. She's a Catholic occultist. Which doesn't mean she isn't smart or even a good judge. But it's pretty gross nonetheless.
@someonenew35473 жыл бұрын
This woman is great. She will be the best SCOTUS.😍😍
@dmilinare3 жыл бұрын
Are they literally testing her basic legal knowledge. Come on folks, she’s a seasoned judge, professor, scholar, and dare I say it; Mother. She’s heard it all lol
@peachion23 жыл бұрын
Three years on the bench is not a seasoned judge.
@Migs33 жыл бұрын
We ought to have leaders like her.
@renekostolnik57093 жыл бұрын
To steal your workers rights? www.goiam.org/news/supreme-court-nominee-has-troubling-track-record/
@jimking87543 жыл бұрын
Harris is a clown
@MrAlittle51503 жыл бұрын
So is Amy Klobuchar. 2 Bozos
@pault40043 жыл бұрын
@@MrAlittle5150 Well I think you'd have a better opinion of both women if you wee a man. I think a little is probably accurate.
@pault40043 жыл бұрын
"Men" like you are always intimidated by smart competent women. If you had a pair you'd be in her corner. Instead you call her a clown because that's the first noun you thought of while looking in the mirror.
@65csx833 жыл бұрын
Why does this show Democrats asking only stupid questions? Why weren't some insightful , thought provoking, astute questions included?
@dbergerac96323 жыл бұрын
They did not ask any.
@justinlance41743 жыл бұрын
@Shae Tallent yep thats the democrats philosophy for sure. pitiful sheep. Stupid is stupid does
@rossburns29053 жыл бұрын
@Shae Tallent ‘stupid is AS stupid does’
@Beesbumbles3 жыл бұрын
That's the point. They were simple questions and she still went around them and didn't answer them. The questions may not invoke thought, but her answers certainly did.
@aprofessionalprocrastinato6083 жыл бұрын
Because there weren't any to include. in an effort to push her to show her political agenda, all they did was amplify theirs.
@la_bob87523 жыл бұрын
Note to conservatives on ACB (disclosure: I consider myself a conservative): It's entirely possible a Justice Barrett will vote on a case contrary to the way some of us would like the case to be decided. Based on her answers, we will still have to respect that she applied the law as best and as objectively as she could, not necessarily as we hoped she might. Just a word to the wise.
@buildwithKarl3 жыл бұрын
Yes and that’s the whole point of the Judicial branch. They aren’t supposed to act on their personal political beliefs. They were created with the intent to make decisions based on their interpretation of the Constitution. This is why the entire narrative that the left is trying to perpetuate that her religious beliefs make her unqualified is ridiculous.
@TheBusttheboss3 жыл бұрын
That is still a huge imrpovement over liberal activist judges.
@matthewleibfred7603 жыл бұрын
real conservatives believe in your sentiment
@ivandrago11333 жыл бұрын
As a conservative, I believe the court should be independent and vote on the merit of the case law and with that belief, I understand and accept that I may be disappointed. That also means, I shouldn’t be forced to be disappointed because a justice wants to be liked and advocates activism to make a point against a President he/she doesn’t agree with (ahem, Justice Roberts).
@jetstream39543 жыл бұрын
Judges deciding as some people like it is the dream of totalitarian thinkers. That”s why some want to pack the court, they hope to control the judiciary, and rule over us like a monarch with absolute power. They forget one day the other party will be in power, and will ruled with absolute power as well, or one party remains in power forever and we would have a dictatorship.
@educatededucated1963 жыл бұрын
Best appointment yet by the President.
@tld86303 жыл бұрын
Bravo Prez Trump!!! ❤🇺🇸❤🇺🇸
@davidblake78863 жыл бұрын
Just a wise woman. Hope God continues to bless and give her wisdom
@jordan974203 жыл бұрын
Absolutely not
@CJ-um1og3 жыл бұрын
@@jordan97420 Welp... that’s what the comment sections are for... expressing opinions 😬
@brandiphillips57753 жыл бұрын
If she were a Buddhist or a Muslim, no one would have an issue with her beliefs.
@whoahorseywhoa46853 жыл бұрын
i would
@brandiphillips57753 жыл бұрын
@@whoahorseywhoa4685Well you're not likely a member of Senate
@whoahorseywhoa46853 жыл бұрын
@@brandiphillips5775 so?
@michaelgarrido3813 жыл бұрын
Thee most qualified ever! just follow the Constitution as written.
@chysel48603 жыл бұрын
And the constitution never contemplated the rights of the black people they enslaved or the rights of women. If we were all following the constitution then ACB wouldn't even be a judge.
@michaelgarrido3813 жыл бұрын
@@chysel4860 just my opinion if you don't want to follow the constitution don't let the door hit you on the way out of this country
@michaelgarrido3813 жыл бұрын
@@chysel4860 it never say anything about slavery or womens rights i think you confusing it with the Democrats of the Civil War in wich it took thr Republicans to defeat slavery.
@jackpage58953 жыл бұрын
@@michaelgarrido381 you do realize that the parties switched after that happened right? the Republicans of the Civil War era became the Democrats of today...
@michaelgarrido3813 жыл бұрын
@@jackpage5895 that is what you say they are keeping the chains on by offering to take care of there slaves with freebies free healthcare free food free housing free collage free everything for your vote on the backs of working people.
@suemarie66763 жыл бұрын
Nobody got they're way with her ..and they're demonic ways...good🌠
@Andrew-pb6hy3 жыл бұрын
What? Nobody got their* way with her.... And their* demonic ways... Good. She didn't answer any questions. What was she hiding? And why is that OK with you?
@suemarie66763 жыл бұрын
@PINK LADY they are failures..
@suemarie66763 жыл бұрын
@Annie Awesome .I know she is!!
@suemarie66763 жыл бұрын
@moonlight moon 😳😳😁😁✌️✌️
@antoniosaxon86052 жыл бұрын
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
@jedediahhoffman79253 жыл бұрын
she's a class act all around. how can anyone not love this gal? she's obviously wildly intelligent, quick to think and slow to react, and has a solid head on her shoulders. i think this woman is a wonderful choice for this seat.
@Grimlock19793 жыл бұрын
"how can anyone not love this gal?" Because of things she said or did in the past.
@jedediahhoffman79253 жыл бұрын
@@Grimlock1979 well, I guess you could share with the rest of the world how you have gone your entire life without saying or doing something that could be viewed as a mistake/wrong
@Grimlock19793 жыл бұрын
@@jedediahhoffman7925 Well, I'm not a supreme court judge. What I say is not important, what she says is. If it were up to her, she would undo a lot of Ruth Bader Ginsberg's accomplishments. She would undo Roe v Wade if she could, which the majority of Americans would disagree with. She is also anti-LTBQ and she would take away their rights if she could, which the majority of Americans also disagree with. Senate Republicans claim that she is someone who follows the law and not her own religious beliefs but in her own writings, she has admitted the opposite. Her record as a federal appeals court judge indicates that she will issue politically conservative rulings with harmful social consequences. She has also been a judge for a very small amount of time. She shouldn't have been nominated.
@randyguinn95123 жыл бұрын
She ran circles around the senators questions! This is a very intelligent and capable woman to fill the role!
@johnshu1988x3 жыл бұрын
I consider myself a democrat, but I am extremely impressed with Judge Amy Coney Barrett. She sounds like one of the most intelligent/well spoken individuals I have ever heard speak at a senate hearing. She seems extremely wise, and with the supreme court being a lifetime role, I expect her to make multiple morally correct decision moving forward. She seems like the great bi-partisan judge.
@bigboobies26472 жыл бұрын
What are your thoughts on the new nomination Jackson?
@GINGI95193 жыл бұрын
She's gonna make a great Justice
@bertcarandang67693 жыл бұрын
If Judge Barrett is going to run for President, Americans should vote for her...
@eponz4354 Жыл бұрын
She is amazing. I’m happy to her in the Supreme Court. Glad to have a leader like her.
@14dolphins113 жыл бұрын
You have just betrayed your Country today . Hope you are proud of yourself .
@tubehound693 жыл бұрын
2:42 "I don't know where you're going with this." Translation: "I've seen enough litigation from lawyers to know when a line of questioning is attempting box someone in."
@carltyndall53027 ай бұрын
Amy Coney Barrett is one American treasure that ALL can be grareful for...an AMAZING human being and Patriotic American....WOW!!!
@JakobChanPogi3 жыл бұрын
She answered questions without looking for a notes.
@blinkblink22553 жыл бұрын
Because she didn't answer anything. Just blabbed through with pointless words.
@laurakuzma56573 жыл бұрын
She doesn't believe in climate change. Oh god help us...
@JakobChanPogi3 жыл бұрын
@@blinkblink2255 what kind of a midget mind do you have, 2nd or 3rd grader?
@dr.alinagrigore9783 жыл бұрын
Outstanding answers! Judge Barrett is flawless! Is is embarrassing and painful to witness what she had to go through!
@MR-TNISNE13 жыл бұрын
Keanu Reeves wouldn’t dodge these bullets like this.
@juanitamasian94143 жыл бұрын
ACB is so impressive in all her replies and no doubt a highly intelligent person. She would be an asset to SCOTUS.
@derekrickmon53163 жыл бұрын
Absolutely. Very intelligent.
@blinkblink22553 жыл бұрын
Right there at the -200 IQ. I can see what it seems intelligent to you, far cry from your range.
@anthonym30213 жыл бұрын
I'm left-leaning, but I really like Barrett as a person. Smart, conscientious, and remarkably calm. Way better than Kavanaugh.
@elijahnatureboy3 жыл бұрын
ACB should definitely be a SCOTUS Justice! Beginning with Thomas as my first, I have never witnessed a more qualified potential candidate for the SCOTUS. She IS NOT a croud pleaser but an independent free thinking and self realized individual worthy to become a SCOTUS Justice. May she be confirmed!
@janetprice852 жыл бұрын
And both Thomas and Barrett were maligned and lied about by the same liars that used a fake dossier the CIA told the FBI was phoney but still attempted an illegal impeachment. Thank you Democrats for six plus years of anarchy, lies, innocent lives ruined, arson, crime, and incompeten ce aided by your equally corrupt media stooges.
@amorin3293 жыл бұрын
These are your choices for "top moments"? I found them to be unconstructive and felt that each of the people who were supposed to be asking Judge Coney Barrett questions regarding her qualifications and comments on her experiences on the bench, but instead spent their allotted speaking times pushing their own agendas, mostly regarding their dislike for Trump and his administration, and their feigned concern regarding the overturning of laws such as those that have made and keep abortion legal, whwn there are no cases on the horizon that will call those into question and require even lower courts to cast additional legal decisions, let alone make it to the Supreme Court where those judges would have to vote. These hearings have become like everything else the Senate has turned matters into lately, a joke.
@sarahpettyYTSUX3 жыл бұрын
We Trump Supporters are NOT Tired of WINNING!!!
@unworthyservantofgodjesusc87763 жыл бұрын
Open your hearts to the one true living God JESUS CHRIST YOU WILL HAVE EVERLASTING LIFE. God Jesus Christ is Coming back soon. Accept him dear friends and get saved. Romans 10:13 For “Everyone who calls on the name of the LORD will be saved.” John 14:14 YESHUA:- You may ask me for anything in my name, and I will do it.:::::::
@annA-fl8um3 жыл бұрын
Repent and be baptized everyone of you in the name of JESUS Christ for the remission of sins. Unless a man be born again he CANNOT enter the kingdom of God
@Romans6.1-23 жыл бұрын
Precious souls, repent or perish
@clarkevander3 жыл бұрын
"I couldn't possibly comment on a case not before me, that would be unbecoming of a future justice"
@amberreynolds14373 жыл бұрын
Such a strong, independent woman.
@FalconTypo62 жыл бұрын
That has shut down strong, independent women. Ya got duped, derp.
@tonyz71893 жыл бұрын
She makes Klobuchar look so stupid.
@hosnaarzani3 жыл бұрын
Definiton of Cool, Calm and Collected.
@Boarderczar3 жыл бұрын
Amy is an old school American woman. She is exactly the person for this position. May God bless her with many years on the court.
@peanut9243 жыл бұрын
Trump is brilliant for interviewing ACB and for nominating her!
@janesimmons18613 жыл бұрын
nominated by dark money
@belindasnyder78373 жыл бұрын
AWESOME JOB! JUDGE AMY BARRETT
@rosemicmeriba93343 жыл бұрын
BEST JUDGE OF USA. GOD BLESS ALL WOMEN.
@jamesdavis7006 ай бұрын
Amy Coney Barrett was a great choice. I think she is absolutely fantastic.
@ratumelimatanatoto24883 жыл бұрын
Jeepers the Democrats are really petty.
@hipnhappenin2 жыл бұрын
Kamala Harris thought she really threw down the mic on that one....
@danielrowell55593 жыл бұрын
I like the way she handled herself and I think that she will make a great addition to the Supreme Court.
@ns60953 жыл бұрын
For someone who stated "breathing is not a constitutional right" as a reason for her court decision... think this was a bad move by Trump. Her hearing went smoothly because democrats have nothing to worry about with this one.
@CJDavislife3 жыл бұрын
Judge Barrett is literally the smartest person in the room.
@kcreagan97992 жыл бұрын
Smartest person in D.C.!
@wmasterk99203 жыл бұрын
Why doesn’t anybody say anything about Harris interrupting ACB? Such a rude person.
@Esmerelda-rm6qj3 жыл бұрын
I don't know, I'd think the worse person is the one who will likely take away people's healthcare and other rights.
@Mewstor1513 жыл бұрын
Senators have limited time, they all interrupted Gorsuch and Kavanaugh as well because it's their time and they can ask whatever they want. Both sides did it and it's not rude.
@hancholo34113 жыл бұрын
@@Esmerelda-rm6qj what rights , what healthcare ?
@Esmerelda-rm6qj3 жыл бұрын
@@hancholo3411 The fact that you won't acknowledge them means either you haven't been paying attention, you're stupid, or you're just too selfish to think of others.
@hancholo34113 жыл бұрын
@@Esmerelda-rm6qj so tell me what rights you talking about ? And about obamacare , what are the right of people refused to pay for it, why your healthcare forced everyone to oay for it, why does it drive up the cost of healthcare many times, why only you just can choose to have one doctor
@tyreemason53153 жыл бұрын
She had to make it very clear to them, she is not running to be a politician, she is running to be a judiciary judge. It seems that they were asking hardly any questions that was related to the law, but instead crazy irrelevant questions that related to politics.
@janetprice852 жыл бұрын
Her treatment by the Senate and media was shameful. Susan B.Anthony and Ms. Pankhurst are spinning.
@elisethompson4063 жыл бұрын
shes got a damn good head on her shoulders
@eriklarson20666 ай бұрын
Most intelligent person on the Supreme Court
@puentecorto26883 жыл бұрын
MT Trump put 3 Conservative judges. It is right.in the history of the United Sates.