Рет қаралды 245,141
♘ Follow me on lichess (write, ask, challenge): lichess.org/@/hpy
😎 Become a Patron (extra daily content): / hangingpawns
🎥 Twitch: / hangingpawnstv
💲 Support the channel: www.paypal.me/...
👕 Chess merch!: teespring.com/...
Identifying and utilizing weak squares in your opponent’s position and safeguarding the weak squares and potential outposts in your own is crucial for winning in chess.
I have chosen this topic for the first video in the series on middlegames because I think that most players miss out on this huge part of chess critical thinking.
What differentiates strong players from the weak is that the strong players, and grandmasters in particular, tend to identify weak squares and concentrate on either weakening them further by removing their defender, or increasing the pressure on the squares, hence gaining a huge positional advantage.
A single weakness could mean the difference between victory and defeat, and potential outposts, how to spot and use them is an essential skill in every chess player’s repertoire.
The first stage in utilizing a weakness in your opponent’s camp is thinking about how squares could potentially become weak. Secondly, you have to imagine squares being undefended; if a pawn weren’t on the board, and the square becomes weak, is it a strong outpost? If a piece is off the board, will I be able to use a particular square? Which of my pieces would like to occupy which square?
Questions like these might seem redundant, but you’d be surprised how many players miss out on huge positional possibilities simply because they fail to ask themselves these questions.
Critical thinking and talking to yourself will help you find potential targets. After you have found them, you have to think of ways to use them.
In the four examples I used in the video, you can see how strong grandmasters started to think of certain squares as holes in the position, devised a plan of how to exploit them, and went on to occupy them with (varying) success.
Training and studying can be hard, and positional and strategical training can be especially exhausting. This method, of studying a position and scanning it for weak squares is one of the most effective ways to improve your understanding in the middlegame.
Example games:
Rustam Mashrukovich Kasimdzhanov vs Susanto Megaranto, 2008 Dresden Olympiad
Sergei Azarov vs Bartosz Socko, Ostrava 2009
Spassky vs Fischer, Rejkjavik 1972 (game 13)
Fischer vs Bisguier, 1963/64 US Championship (round 4)
#chess