Pantsir air defence system - SA-22 Greyhound | Is it successful or not?

We are investigating the Pantsir-S1 air defence system and its variants, one of the most mediatic Russian weapon systems at war in Ukraine, Libya, and Syria. #Pantsir #RussianArmy #ukrainewar
What are the capabilities of the Pantsir air defence system?
How effective is the Pantsir against UAVs?
Is it a marvellous point air defence system or a complete failure?
Is the Pantsir a self-propelled anti-aircraft gun or something else?
00:00 Introduction
01:30 Programme history
03:17 Mission
03:53 Users
04:25 Specifications
04:55 Base vehicle variants (MAN SX 45 / MZKT-7930 / BAZ-6909-019 / GM-352M1E / KaMAZ-53958)
05:36 Pantsir-SA
05:59 Pantsir-M / Pantsir-EM
06:20 9M335 and 57E6 missiles
07:12 57E6M-E missile
07:33 30mm 2A38M gun
08:02 Radars
09:20 War in Libya, Syria, Ukraine
11:33 Analysis
Welcome to our channel. All the weapon systems are like books, and they tell us their stories. The Weapon Detective investigates these books, reads between the lines, analyses them, and tells the untold. At the dawn of the Second Cold War, the fruits of new projects give us clues about the future. But current weapon systems also have their own stories. In our videos, you can find technical information, historical backgrounds, what happened during the development processes, combat experience and political projection. While the Second Cold War is rising, Let's investigate the weapons together.
© Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation, saleema's cooking world, История Оружия, ABC (American Broadcasting Company), AP (Associated Press), Rosteh, United States Department of Defense, Raytheon Technologies, United States Air Force, Тамаз Мухашаврия, Smit2332, PavelMyth, ОБОРОНКА, TRT (Türkiye Radyo Televizyon Kurumu), Turkish Air Force, Syrian Armed Forces, US Southern Command, Baykar Technologies, French Navy, US Navy, TurDef, Republic of Turkey Presidency of Defense Industries, ASELSAN, AA (Anadolu Ajansı), ELTA Systems Ltd, turkishaerospace, КРЫЛЬЯ РОССИИ
Music: Авиамарш - Soviet Air Force March (Instrumental)
Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos
• Weapon Detective
Please click the link to watch our other Russian-Soviet Systems videos
• Russian-Soviet Systems
Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Land videos
• Weapon Detective-Land
Please click the link to watch our other Weapons of Russo-Ukrainian War videos
• Weapons of Russo Ukrai...
/ weapondetective
/ weapondetective
[e-mail]

[@WeaponDetective]

Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos kzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_LrdqB-XbqY2LocUVEaG_w7D Please click the link to watch our other Weapons of Russo Ukrainian War videos kzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_LpXx-5RDAc_25BSc7M3-Rs4 Please click the link to watch our other Russian-Soviet Systems videos kzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_LoX-Waa3Xb-clnCzQXpmcZ6 Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Land videos kzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_LpFkS9hH3KD9uTEKBDVQZRp

[@thomasnowell]

Great content like this deserve a better mic, my man.

[@matthewmoore5698]

You got me subbed just by showing this , I have no bias in any war

[@seherburcebinici8964]

excellent as always 👍

[@shivanshna7618]

Right on time man

[@beachboy0505]

Excellent video. Versatile vehicle Track vehicles are difficult to maintain.

[@jamespaul579]

Thank u very much ❤

[@KonradvonHotzendorf]

12:37 artillery shells get sent. Sounds so friendly 😄🏹💥

[@CREATE-ex6ky]

SA-22 is really cool as well

[@amarjeetbadhani3616]

Wonderful as always..good to see your channel after sometime..JAI HIND 🇮🇳 🇮🇳 🇮🇳 🇮🇳 🇮🇳

[@danielvilliers612]

The Ukrainian farmer are super happy for their new tractor. hahahaha

[@Ghost0fPakistan]

Why do you Indians always spam your country's flag and slogans everywhere? Kinda immature sometimes

[@amarjeetbadhani3616]

@@Ghost0fPakistan why do Pakistan get jealous of this?

[@Ghost0fPakistan]

@@amarjeetbadhani3616 it's not jealousy, it's a complaint cus a lot of your People are spamming that flag on irrelevant topics.

[@amarjeetbadhani3616]

@@Ghost0fPakistan who has stopped you from doing the same and the owner of video does not have any complaint regarding this then why you are having problem??...

[@matthewmoore5698]

Awesome kit

[@blacksheepdog6969]

even if this particular system isn't as effective as the Russians insist, the setup of dual cannons with fast reacting missiles is a really elegant solution to the emerging UAS threat.

[@gantulgaganhuyag717]

But it does not answer third tier fps drones in extremely low altitude one could go as far to say irrelevant

[@TenOrbital]

My tip is don’t skimp on the tyres

[@ironwolfF1]

And never, _ever_ buy 'mil-spec' tires from China...

[@TheMoukis]

It has 2 dual 30mm cannons. So 4 cannons but the ammo is going out like crazy. That's a disadvantage.

[@maexlmaexl1478]

It seems that similar to the azerbaijan-armenia conflict, russian manufactured AA struggles against combat drones. I am no expert but I read that they are difficult to see on radars. So maybe the deployed radar systems arent sensitive enough even though in theory they should be able to counter them. Im interested on your thoughts and the comment section regarding this matter as it seems similar encounters happen in ukraine.

[@aleksaradojicic8114]

While some radars and systems can not see and fight drones, that is not main issue, specially not when we talk about Pantsir. Biggest issue is proper use of air defence. For example, during NK war, Armenians spread there AA batteries around to defend hole line of front. In practice, that meant that batteries were left alone and without any possibility to support each other, which allowed Azeries to go from one battery to next and destroy them one by one. Russians, durring current conflict in Ukraine, use there air defence much better, which lower usefulness of Ukrainian UAVs by a lot.

[@maexlmaexl1478]

@@aleksaradojicic8114 I see. I mean I read that Ukraine lost some but what kind of drones were lost and how many can't be confirmed idependently yet. Saw some russian madpads used as they seem to be the most flexible and easiest systems in this regard. Granted you gave to spot them first and uav can be quite small as well. Considering the logistical issue the russian army faced, I guess the air strikes from ukraine military had it easier as well to be successfull.

[@JPFops]

Not a single one of the *advanced* air defenses in Armenia was destroyed by TB2, all of those were destroyed using Israeli loitering munitions that were designed for SEAD.

[@SRB.4S]

Great analysis and all praise to the author of the video clip, however there are things he failed to analyze, and mentions, or simply missed. And these are the differences, which are big between the original systems and those that were modernized, the first exported variants, primarily in the United Arab Emirates later used in operations in Syria and Libya, are older variants of PANSTIR S1 system, why which was used, radar with a single radar antenna was used older version, which really has a problem to detect some drones and, some of the PANSTIR S1 systems in that variant were destroyed, but that's just a few pieces a large number of drones were destroyed, just by the PANSTIR S1 system. But of course it was not interesting to anyone. It is interesting when they destroyed the best system in their class, especially if it is the Russian system. What you will see as the same for all these damaged or destroyed PANSTIR S1 systems is that they are systems, the initial older generations. Those who have the UAE or the Syrian army, Libya ... For those who do not know, the difference, and the difference is considerable, first of all, the acquisition and target radar radars were replaced, the old acquisition radar had a problem with spotting drones, or you are slow flying objects of small reflective surface, due to the single radar antenna, more precisely only on the front of the radar had an antenna that covered targets in the airspace while on the back and top of the radar, partially "blind". That radar was replaced 7-8 years ago by a completely new radar with a dual radar antenna, which monitors targets, from all sides, and can also threaten multiple targets at greater distances. Practically complete opto-electronics have been replaced, including the acquisition and target radar. The UAE, the Syrian and Libyan and Armenian armies, for example, do not use these new PANSTIR S1 systems, but old versions of these systems, with old radars. But even those older versions had a good effect, against drones, even though the PANSTIR S1 systems themselves had losses in those war actions. On the recordings of damaged and destroyed PANSTIR S1 systems, in those war actions in Syria, Libya ... You will see that only old systems were destroyed, with old versions of radar. Currently, newer versions of PANSIR S1 system, with new radars, are currently owned by Russia, Iraq, Algeria and Serbia ... Of course, Russia has older and newer variants of this system, as well as the navy, and the articulated version of PANSTIR S1 system. Like any other military system, the PANSTIR S1 has its limits. Of course, one can say that the main role is played by the proper use of these systems, which is not the case in Syria and Libya, several of these systems were destroyed when they move independently on the street or at the airport, left completely unprotected,some PANSTIR S1 systems were destroyed before they were in operation, some even in warehouses and garages like those of Haftar's forces, which originate from the UAE ... Which only speaks in favor of the totally ignorant and inadequate use of these systems.So the doctrine of the use of this system is very important. For now, only Russia has a small number of the latest versions of this PANSTIR SM system, while the first user of the export version of this PANSTIR S1M system will most likely be Serbia. The difference between the older and newer versions of the PANSTIR S1 is, as I stated, primarily in radars, primarily in acquisition radar. OLDER VERSION OF PANSTIR S1 SYSTEMS, WITH SINGLE ACQUISITION RADAR ANTENNA. ALL DESTROYED AND DAMAGED PANSIR S1 SYSTEMS ARE EXACTLY THIS OLDER GENERATION, WITH THIS RADAR SYSTEM. THAT RADAR HAD A PROBLEM AND THAT IS WHY IT WAS EJECTED FROM FURTHER, PRODUCTION, THE CHANGE WAS MADE TO A MUCH BETTER RADAR OF THE NEW GENERATION. PANSTIR S1, OLDER VERSIONS FOR, OLD ACQUISIC RADAR WITH SINGLE ANTENNA. commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Pantsir-S1?uselang=sr#/media/File:%D0%91%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%8B%D0% B5_% D1% 80% D0% B0% D1% 81% D1% 87% D0% B5% D1% 82% D1% 8B_% D0% 97% D0% A0% D0% 9A_% D0% A1-400_% D0% B8_% D0% 97% D0% A0% D0% 9F% D0% 9A_% C2% AB% D0% 9F% D0% B0% D0% BD% D1% 86% D0% B8% D1% 80% D1% 8C- % D0% A11% C2% BB_% D0% 9F% D0% 92% D0% 9E_% D0% 91% D0% B0% D0% BB% D1% 82% D0% B8% D0% B9% D1% 81% D0 % BA% D0% BE% D0% B3% D0% BE_% D1% 84% D0% BB% D0% BE% D1% 82% D0% B0_% D0% BF% D0% BE% D1% 80% D0% B0 % D0% B7% D0% B8% D0% BB% D0% B8_% D1% 83% D1% 87% D0% B5% D0% B1% D0% BD% D1% 8B% D0% B5_% D1% 86% D0 % B5% D0% BB% D0% B8_% D0% BD% D0% B0_% D0% BF% D0% BE% D0% BB% D0% B8% D0% B3% D0% BE% D0% BD% D0% B5_ % D0% 90% D1% 88% D1% 83% D0% BB% D1% 83% D0% BA.jpg commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Pantsir-S1?uselang=sr#/media/File:%D0%97%D0%B0%D1%89%D0%B8%D1%82%D0% BD% D1% 8B% D0% B9_% D0% BA% D1% 83% D0% BF% D0% BE% D0% BB_% D0% BE% D1% 82_% D0% B1% D0% B5% D1% 81% D0% BF% D0% B8% D0% BB% D0% BE% D1% 82% D0% BD% D0% B8% D0% BA% D0% BE% D0% B2_% D1% 81% D0% BE% D0% B7% D0% B4% D0% B0% D0% BB% D0% B8_% D1% 81% D0% BF% D0% B5% D1% 86% D0% B8% D0% B0% D0% BB% D0% B8% D1% 81% D1% 82% D1% 8B_% D0% A0% D0% AD% D0% 91_% D0% B8_% D0% 9F% D0% 92% D0% 9E_% D0% BD% D0% B0_% D1% 83% D1% 87% D0% B5% D0% BD% D0% B8% D1% 8F% D1% 85_% D0% B2_% D0% A7% D0% B5% D0% BB% D1% 8F% D0% B1% D0% B8% D0% BD% D1% 81% D0% BA% D0% BE% D0% B9_% D0% BE% D0% B1% D0% BB% D0% B0% D1% 81% D1% 82% D0% B8.jpg PANSTIR S1 NEWER GENERATION SYSTEM WITH, DOUBLE-SIDED ANTENNA OF ACQUISITION RADAR "JANUS" commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Pantsir-S1?uselang=sr#/media/File:Streitkr%C3%A4fte-Serbiens_Pantsir-S1.jpg commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Pantsir-S1?uselang=sr#/media/File:Pantsir-S1_(SA-22_Greyhound)_(41204907934).jpg

[@user-od1yi5iq1k]

The Armenians were using very obsolete air defense systems with even more outdated missiles. And still they did manage to shoot down some drones.

[@TB-zf7we]

I am surprised at the effectiveness of the Ukrainian UAV TB2 against Russian supply lines with the Pantsir widely dispersed through out the column. Does the Pantsir/Russian air defence systems, have trouble identifying medium size UAVs?

[@aleksaradojicic8114]

We can not comment on that, as in current war both sides are engaged in extreme informatio war and propaganda. What is true and what happened will be only possible to see when this ends.

[@radonsider9692]

Given that TB-2s were successful against Pantsir S-1s before the UKR, probably the composite airframe and the size/speed helps

[@slavisaasus]

Russian side has reported downing of 14 out of 15 Ukrainian TB2.

[@user-dl3nc4jx7k]

Russia has already shot down 47 bayraktars. against modern air defense.they don't play

[@radonsider9692]

@@slavisaasus and that's without proof.

[@padmesh_0_0]

🌻🌻🌻

[@MPdude237]

The Russians definitely are the best at ground based air defense systems. I would like to see someone develop a SPAA version of NASAMS, since that could compete with with both short range and medium range Systems from Russia even if it’s not the best in class since it could use the large stockpile of Air to Air missiles available to the West and Western Aligned countries.

[@carkawalakhatulistiwa]

90 % spaa is Made by ussr so.

[@nikkotan2840]

It's just basically a Tunguska Turret on a Wheeled Vehicle Platform nothing change at all.

[@dawnsparrow4477]

Too nice video about explaining characteristics of this Russian Air defense systems (Pantsir SA -22).other versions ( S1M,S1 )...thanks ( weapon detective) channel for sharing ..about Pantsir S1 defeat in Lybia suspected Egypt F-16 🇪🇬 or Mig 31 of Algeria 🇩🇿 destroyed it

[@benchabasilem4352]

Algeria doesn't have mig 31

[@olivierpuyou3621]

When you named the "rich" countries that bought the system, you notified Algeria. And it is far from being a rich country, which is currently struggling with rather worrying economic difficulties, at least for its neighbors.

[@WeaponDetective]

Yes, Algeria is now struggling with economic difficulties. We mean that when did Algeria acquire the Pantsir, it had money.

[@Joewest2k11]

What happened to the TB-2 Bayraktar?

[@srijanme]

They all got shot down.

[@keithadams812]

Well Ukraine now has 3 or 4 of these systems... Wonder if they can do anything with them guess we'll find out in the coming weeks

[@RAY-THE-WAY]

I saw at least one of those get stuck in deep mud in Ukraine. Russian troops had to abandon it. Edit: never mind you mentioned it at the end 🤣

[@aleksaradojicic8114]

Yep, that is why countries in these part of Europe prefer track platforms.

[@jospi2]

@@aleksaradojicic8114 I've also seen a lot of track vehicles stuck in the Ukrainian mud.

[@aleksaradojicic8114]

@@jospi2 Even they are not immune on mud, but in general tracks are better then wheels.

[@benghazi4216]

@@aleksaradojicic8114 But then we have the Abrams that got stuck following the Archer into the forest. The Pantsir getting stuck had leaking hubcaps. A clear sign of poor maintenance practices. That is why that one got "stuck", Many others have tire problems. It's the same reason. Lack of maintenance, more specifically rotation of the tires. They are simply breaking down when you lower the tire pressure for some off road action.

[@losttownstreet3409]

It's possible to disable tracked vehicles (tracks aren't as good). It's a difficult situation. You aren't at your best concentration after 72h of driving and I see nowhere a place for crew rotation. The crew needs proper training. If it where possible to defend a position for some time, you could dig these things out of the mud with proper training. If you are alone without any support abandoning is the correct choice. I don't see any amenities for crews (you'll need 2 shifts of 12h) and this truck seems to be developed with a fixed position in mind. These truck seems to be developed with stationary combat in mind and they need to be deployed alongside the supply chain in 5km-10km distances but you don't have infinite number of systems (with a success rate under 50 percent you'll need 3 units for 1 target; your life depends on it). It takes only 1 sleep deprived soldier to destroy the whole system. With only 750 rounds and 12 missiles these units needs constant maintenance (stationary combat).

[@InsightGrid620]

Make on kf21 or j35

[@thetigerii9506]

you should increase your video volume

[@bostorgay]

good meal for someone.

[@vladafrka3053]

it is gud trust me

[@stevena2051]

Mali has bought some Pantsir S SA 22 in 2023 beginning

[@chandrachurniyogi8394]

the Pantsir-S1M SAM system could be mounted on the Lynx KF41-E IFV . . . the Pantsir-S1M needs larger surface-to-air missiles with equally bigger explosive warheads . . . in case of wheeled vehicles the KAMAZ 6560 HD 8X8 + 5.5 in. Lift 13.2 TDI I6 4-Dr Double Cab Armoured AT Truck (LHD) is more appropriate . . .

[@sepuk]

Pantsir is a good idea realized russian way :)

[@dumbworld4653]

India rejected this system and choose Biho from S.Korea over not meeting the requirements

[@shivanshna7618]

Yeah but even biho is blocked bcz of complaint from Russians i think? At this point we may get L&T anti air system before case is done though which chassis will we put it on ? Bmp ,WHAP or something new i imagine

[@habahan4257]

They are completely different systems. The K30 Biho is designed to accompany advancing armoured units. It is tracked and armoured. The range of its missiles is 7 km. The Pantsir is just a truck-mounted air defence missile/gun system. It is for stationary defence. The Pantsir uses its wheels just to go from one location to another. It is not armoured. Its missiles have a range of 20 km.

[@shivanshna7618]

@@habahan4257 yeah we know that's why it was weird they were in same competition for orders

[@habahan4257]

@@shivanshna7618 I agree

[@aleksaradojicic8114]

@@shivanshna7618 Not complitly. Pantsir can be used in same role as Biho, but with proper and careful way of use.

[@maxt7525]

Despite western propaganda, this system has performed extremely well in Syria

[@MSkallywagg]

But poorly in Ukraine

[@BlackeyeVuk]

@@MSkallywagg Said who?

[@melvinthedeathless.melvint6727]

Syria? ISIS has fighter jets and heli?

[@TorianTammas]

Against whom? Who actually has an airforce in Syria the Russians would attack?

[@JPFops]

Right. kzbin.info/www/bejne/moGyk2x5hJiUjas

[@wall7171]

Did anybody else get the tesler ad. do they realize how shady and suspicious they are

[@Heshhion]

Pantsir air defence system being taken out by Israel missiles in Syria deems this useless :)

[@gabrieljoseph6310]

An Israeli suicide drone mini Harpy destroyed systems Pantsir SA-22 kzbin.info/www/bejne/moGyk2x5hJiUjas

[@brendanharvey3583]

Just because it was taken out does not make it useless😂

[@JozefTrubac]

Can you make video about how citizens can fight tanks in urban warfare? Asking for Ukrainian friend ;) My thoughts were around targeting tank visors and optics with molotovs or somehow throw paint to the same weak spots. It won't destroy the tank but it would render it blind/useless.

[@danielvilliers612]

The cocktail Molotov is just folklore. They don't need it because they have been given 20 000 anti tank weapon, from Javelin, Nlaw, at4, including their soviet stile antitank weapon. Ukraine will become the graveyard of the Russian army.

[@JozefTrubac]

@@Craigx71 Nazis that miraculously appear when the country started to orient towards EU and NATO? What a convenient coincident. Putler himself said that he wants to restore ussr so no need to create excuses.

[@ItsRawdraft2]

Aww

[@dineshsingh-gb6un]

Hum sahi nikle

[@Abdullah-mn6sw]

Why do nations have both tracked and wheeled air defence systems, and some even on trailers. Even those have different variants. Shouldn't they have just one design to reduce complications?

[@cabbartoynakbas200]

its called as layer,you cant defend your sky with same aa,it must be layered with different missiles and rounds.range and mobility important in a war.

[@thetommyhawk8244]

so when you mean nations, the only one to develop both is the Russians. The wheeled and tracked nature shouldn't be regarded too much, mostly down to terrain and availability of paved surfaces. What should be of note is the sheer number of air defense is to provide a sophisticated air defense net of multiple layers, to reduce the reliance on friendly air power to maintain air superiority. There's air defense at the regimental level, then at the tactical level, then at the strategic / theater level, and then there's also point air defense to protect larger array air defense units from SEAD retaliation. Panstir-S1s were basically slated to replace the 2K22 Tunguskas in service but due to the whole lack of Soviet-era levels of funding, the process to replace them is slow. This also is of note, the reduction of funding compared to the Red Army's spending, pooled in with Russian economic decline with the USSR's collapse, further piled with the sanctions since 2014, the Russian army is a patchwork of multiple examples of hardware, in the process of being phased and phasing out. edit: that first statement is off the top of my head, if i'm incorrect, id love to know, but keep in mind i meant nations that develop it themselves. Purchasing the full Russian net doesnt count, but maybe a mix match of different nation's systems do, like India for example.

[@habahan4257]

The tracked and wheeled vehicles have both unique advantages and disadvantages. The tracked one has better manoeuvrability but it is expensive and complicated. The wheeled one is cheaper and easier to operate but its off-road performance is poor. If you need an air defence system to protect a building or stationary facilities, why would you spend money on an additional vehicle? The trailers are cost-effective for this job.

[@Abdullah-mn6sw]

@@thetommyhawk8244 Well, I have seen India have Shilka tracked SPAAG and also truck mounted ones. And US has one on stryker platform and iirc on tracked apc too.

[@user-od1yi5iq1k]

You need different systems to complement each other as one system can't do it all. You have different radar bands (which is a way of subdividing the very large range of electromagnetic waves into different subranges due to different physical properties) which offer differences in range and detection ability - the higher the frequency the greater the detection ability but at the cost of range. Also, the lower the frequency the larger the radar disc needs to be - this translates into classes of air defense systems. The shorter ranged ones are meant to protect the long-range ones. Tracked vs. wheeled is mostly a question of range (due to fuel efficiency being much higher for wheeled platforms) and mobility (tracks allow off-road movement in terrain and surface conditions that would bog down a wheeled platform). There is also a maintenance perspective as wheeled platforms require a lot less maintenance and are easier to repair due to fewer moving mechanical parts.

[@PraveenSen-nt2ez]

0:04 0:04

[@StraussBR]

Pantsir is very effective against Cruise missiles like the tomahawk and not as effective against drones, but TOR sustems are very effective against drones such as bayraktar

[@orinpolansky386]

It is not "70 percent chance", it is "probability of hit - 0.7". It is completely different numbers. 70% - means you can shoot the whole fucking truck of missiles and did not hit the target. 70% is about luck and coincedense. Probability of hit of 0.7 means that to reach guaranteed probability of 1 you need 2 missiles (1.4). Methods of calculation of chance and probability is defferent.

[@iandoyle3695]

I mean, if you're being pedantic. Sure.

[@siaeciicc330]

MUDRUNNER 08:03

[@user-xr1bu8hi5v]

11:25 это Бук! Одинаково используется 🇷🇺/🇺🇦

[@beachboy0505]

1:39 Russia 🇷🇺 earns a lot of foreign currency by selling arms and munitions. The West would often not sell similar weapons if they were vetoed by a friendly country.

[@yurinator4411]

Has this thing shot down anything, in its existence?

[@brendanharvey3583]

Yes

[@ArabObserver]

operating in a stand alone mode the Pantsir is a sitting duck for the Bayraktar , minimum of 8 Pantsirs operating in network mode is required for it to start being somehow effective .

[@The_ZeroLine]

Saudi Arabia bought the system with no performance demonstration. So, that’s no endorsement.

[@Ade-mu4zn]

🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩

[@Ade-mu4zn]

🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩

[@boyriyan2217]

D asean cm 2 negara yg pny senjata darat berbasis udara cm vietnam dan niyenmar negara lain blm pny syg bgt karena sasaran y bt membidik heli atau jet terbang rendah bisa kejangkau tembakan y mdh3an indonesia k dpn y pny senjata bgni

[@gallaxian]

Looks cool but I’ve seen more than one stuck in the Ukrainian mud.

[@danielvilliers612]

The Ukrainian farmer new tractor. hahahaha

[@gerdohlendorf8456]

Best system of Art.🇷🇺💜

[@watchthe1369]

.....IF you have the chips and semiconductors to run it. They do not have them anymore. As soon as China can verify the nuclear missiles are dead due to lack of maintenance, Russia is going to experience intense surprise butt seks in Siberia.

[@alexkalish8288]

Why not find out yourself, you can buy one in Ukraine for a $100. They are effective as they have stopped all Stuka attacks on the Russian column. Seem to be a coffin against anything else.

[@majalca03]

Ukraine also has several units and is known to be acquiring more.

[@juslitor]

Helps that "acquired" russian vehicles are non taxable.

[@oim8254]

Bayraktar's favourite lunch

[@lek8630]

well time sets things off, all tb2 thats left in ukraine now only being used for recon due to those "Bayraktar's favourite lunch"

[@habahan4257]

Good video. I think that it is a disgrace that Russia has not been able to achieve air superiority and needed air defence systems so far. In these conditions, the TB2 destroys more Russian weapons. Pantsir just stares.

[@BlackeyeVuk]

And how is this not a propaganda comment is beyond me. Ukraine has 20 TB2 in their force, yet somehow they managed to mangle entire Eastern column said armchair Generals on youtube. Their numbers cannot produce effectiveness for any meaningful suppression. Not to mention limited munition and rockets as well. But hey, ya'll can believe what you want. All vidoyas around here including TB2 are just rehashed vidoyas from past conflicts.

[@humphrey4976]

I imagine Russia think they can win without showing their full capabilities to the west as they are very much watching on to see what happens.

[@BlackeyeVuk]

@@paulbarclay4114 I get your sarcasm. And it should be taken with a grain of salt.

[@user-od1yi5iq1k]

Most Pantsir-S1's that have been destroyed were not manned or in operation.

[@atagun3817]

Nope there's footage of TB2 drones picking up pantsirs with activated radars. Turkish drones totally humiliated this system

[@BlackeyeVuk]

Im gonna be honest. This video is alright. However I have some doubt about intelligence of the community around this channel. First of all, Pansir is secondary line defense system against low flying missiles, drones and helicopters. Their radar system is designed to compliment other long range x and s band radars. Pansir is not a standalone system to be used offensively. Nor a system for establishing Air superiority. But a system for perimeter defense. Meaning support asset for defending high priority targets. (like stationary radars, bases, artillery and missile instellations). For what it is, and money invested, a very cheap tool for effective suppression of enemy elements.

[@hamishneilson7140]

He mentioned all of that pretty early on in the video…

[@Sumitchand.official]

जय श्री राम...

[@child3862]

Well war thunder players this is gonna be a pain aint it?

[@gogrape9716]

Drone bait...

[@mazas1550]

🤣

[@mad-yordle]

Turkish drones disgraced Pansir. It was a fun experience when an expensive air defense system, which was claimed to be very effective against drones, was repeatedly defeated by cheap drones.

[@user-od1yi5iq1k]

No, they didn't. Scores were shot down over Libya, Syria and now Ukraine. The only time Turkish drones were able to win against the Pantsir-S1 was when it was unmanned or inoperational.

[@youmad7068]

It is not an expensive air defense system, it is actually one of the cheapest on the market and Turkish drones did not disgraced Pansir. You are winning wars only in media....

[@leme5639]

@@youmad7068 :)))) darling:))) WE'VE SEEN VIDEOS FROM ARMENIA AND UKRAINE IN WHICH PATHETIC RUSSIAN TECH IS BEING ABSOLUTELY OBLITERATED.

[@gabrieljoseph6310]

@@user-od1yi5iq1k Israeli air force destroyed another 2 Pantsir SAMs in Damascus. 21.01.2019 kzbin.info/www/bejne/moGyk2x5hJiUjas

[@seyiesu923]

@@leme5639 Dude all UAV convoy attacks that we've seen are on supply trucks, we haven't yet seen a Pansir system that was engaged and destroyed by a drone. The footage we've seen are mostly of abandoned pansir systems so we don't really know if any Pansir systems were taken out by drones or jets yet.

[@dineshsingh-gb6un]

System jubardust he ,ab tum kisko burbad kurne pe aajao to wo to hoga hi ,chahe artillery se kuro pur jota radar he tubhi dum dikhara or tumko dukhi kura

[@pembetosbis]

turkish accent

[@WeaponDetective]

Good ear. Our narrator is a Turkish-American.

[@brianjordan2192]

Just another over hyped Russian system that under performs.

[@williamzk9083]

I’m not surprised by more Russian weapons Hype. To put it in context ATACMS destroyed 21 helicopters, one spoon rest radar and destroyed one Pantsir. Pantsir is a dumb design. Radar, Guns, crew, missiles on one big fat clunky target. SkyNEX is far more effective

[@davidreynolds3082]

Not.

[@haydnvonmed6624]

Nothing special,just a kashtan on a truck

[@evonrn2000]

Junk

[@theenchiladakid1866]

Hasn't shot down a single ukrainian jet

[@maxt7525]

Ah yes surely you have all the most accurate information from both sides lol 😂😂😂😂

[@theenchiladakid1866]

@@maxt7525 You should just come out and admit you are a commi ponko

[@benghazi4216]

@@maxt7525 We have TB-2 strikes on Pantsir, on video, with them firing all over the place So it isn't working that well..

[@user-od1yi5iq1k]

The Pantsir-S1 is not meant to shoot down jets unless they are flying at a low altitude.

[@benghazi4216]

@@user-od1yi5iq1k The TB-2 is a propeller driven slow flying drone, operating 5000m. That is exactly what Pantsir should take out. It should be the easy target, compared to something like an A10 skimming the ground.

[@JoaoSoares-rs6ec]

So far its has shown to be more propaganda than actual effective

[@user-dg9hq8uz3g]

Yet it is some of the better AA in the world.

[@JoaoSoares-rs6ec]

@@user-dg9hq8uz3g BS it is, their were several destroyed so far byt the exact systems it was to defend against.

[@OiabSc]

Funny because you offer no specific claims from the " western viewpoint". You are a Russian who believes in the strength of the Russian bear! So again who and what are they quoted as saying these people in the west? Right I thought you didn't know much other than the different models of the Pantsir.

[@emregungor2986]

[@sportsentertainmentandfun]

Russian destroyed each and every weapons of west countries and west claims they have best weapons in history american weapons always failed against russian weapons😂😂😂😂