Webinar: World Energy Outlook 2024 - the Age of Electricity

[@danielmadar9938]

Thanks

[@FJStraußinger]

William Nordhaus DICE 2023 Model calculates 2,6 degree celsius is the optimum between economy of avoiding emissions and damages ! ❓❔⁉️

[@grandhotelbanfora6866]

🇧🇫 insightful

[@tomconrad7091]

Please IEA you can do better. You are using the old oil paradigm to project electricity use. You try to apply monopoly supply and demand models to a market where economies of scale don’t apply. I find that the projections of Tony Seba at RethinkX are much better.

[@FJStraußinger]

Seba is a clown 😂😂😂

[@tomconrad7091]

@ Please compare Seba results to IEA. Results matter! This video belongs in the circus.

[@FJStraußinger]

@@tomconrad7091 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ i think we agree to disagree, as far as i see it seba is the clown, no body will pay for this overcapacitys and will then give energy for free! and to build the infrastructure for this obercapacity is not possible due to pricing signals! solar pv and wind is not the problem! It is the Ronts, the smart grid, the grid itself, the electrolyseurs and so on in 2100 ok but not 2030/40/60/70

[@tomconrad7091]

@ Yes, we agree to disagree. You are unlike 99 percent of the people on the internet who have no idea what they are talking about. Your conclusions are based on an industrial paradigm and I would guess you are over 50 with a technology training like an engineer. Your turn.

[@FJStraußinger]

@ 100% wrong, as i see it, you are the person describing me, or better, you are a strong true believer in your Mr Blablabl Seba! I can show you how incompetent seb is, there is still a paper online where seba mixed up the nuclear PP from france with germany! i wrote them to correct it! nothing happened, but according to this statement seba means 100% Renewables in Germany until 2030 no propblem --> 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣💸💸💸💸🫰🫰🫰🫰🫰 seba = 🤡 And you can talk also to Dr. Ing Michael Liebreich, same opinion like me!