Shoutout to King Mohammed V of Morocco, despite being a subject of Vichy France, he refused to extradite any Jews or enforce any antisemitic laws, declaring all Moroccans as under his protection
@huriale16176 ай бұрын
The Mosque of Paris, build to honor the muslim troops who fought during the first world war, also saved some jews during the Occupation.
@reyson016 ай бұрын
So how come a larger % of Jews in Germany are still around compared to those in Morocco?
@owenm.12826 ай бұрын
@@huriale1617 This is part of our religion to disavow and fight tyrants such as hitler
@jonathanwilliams10656 ай бұрын
@@owenm.1282 and yet so many are cheering for the massacre of Jews
@wat91776 ай бұрын
the last righteous king of morocco
@Jetpackpokemon6 ай бұрын
This must have taken a lot of research, great job!! Thank you for helping me understand this type of history more
@kanaxu17476 ай бұрын
Just 9 minutes into, but it makes me happy to hear you quoting "Atatürk in the Nazi imagination" by Stefan Ihrig. It's really an underrated work with not enough attention
@SpartanStick6 ай бұрын
Jabzy’s vids getting wilder and wilder
@llamagames68036 ай бұрын
You play stick war 3?
@SpartanStick6 ай бұрын
@@llamagames6803 ye
@kaanalpkaratas60916 ай бұрын
Ataturk did not ally with Mussolini as Mussolini was seeking Turkey as a part of his Mare Nostrum. Ataturk even showed up to Italian diplomats while being dressed with Marshall uniform, militarily denouncing Italy.
@johnnyfives54166 ай бұрын
That because he and the ottoman turk fought italy invasion of libya and continue helping the local resistance even after the war was lost and italy occupational.
@lordgrunwalder16075 ай бұрын
@@johnnyfives5416well yes, and + because itally straight up claiming territory from Turkey 💀 it wasnt just a "old rivalship". İtally was straight up threatening Turkey
@kalatiso55415 ай бұрын
Video lacks so many details, like the pogroms in Istanbul and how they were dismantled by ataturk and their leaders executed allowing the 15k Jews to come back to Istanbul to their property
@SabracadabrO5 ай бұрын
He didn’t “align”cuz the he knew the fascists would do to them what they had in plan for Jews,stop kidding yourselves..
@raptorhacker5995 ай бұрын
@@kalatiso5541 well cemal was himself a doner jew
@zhcultivator5 ай бұрын
Please consider leaving the list of sources for this video available so we can know where the information for your videos are coming from. Thanks as always for your videos.
@josecipriano30486 ай бұрын
Many in India sympathized with the nazis as well. Gandhi amongst them.
@Sagar-vv9gd6 ай бұрын
For west colonisation by France, Britain is good but Nazis are bad 🤡
@bigbootros43626 ай бұрын
@@Sagar-vv9gdBoth are bad, but the Nazis were a lot lot worse.
@عليياسر-ف4ن9ك6 ай бұрын
@@bigbootros4362France: How did you know if they were killing millions of people like me?
@DirkusTurkess6 ай бұрын
@@عليياسر-ف4ن9ك Should google what he thought about South Africans.
@barahng6 ай бұрын
Mein Kampf is still quite popular in India.
@Torarz01FIN6 ай бұрын
Just finished the last episode. Perfect timing.
@luishernandezblonde6 ай бұрын
To be honest, Muslims were a significant group of sympathisers for the Axis in general. As much as the Nazis enjoyed their backing, the Japanese also received significant backing by them, in particular during the early days of the WW2 in today's Xinjiang (among Uyghurs, Uzbeks and Kazakhs), Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Mindanao (today's Philippines), Indochina and Thailand, Central Asia and South Asia.
@TP_ERK6 ай бұрын
it is like finland being an ally of axis. just protecting their lands from soviet union and nothing more.
@luishernandezblonde6 ай бұрын
@@TP_ERK Not just only against the Soviets, many of them supported the Axis against China and Britain.
@kraijom3196 ай бұрын
Even Japan's native irregular fighters in Indonesia were commanded by islamic clerics
@davidbowie50236 ай бұрын
German-Japanese jihadism was crazy. I couldn't imagine this happening.
@luishernandezblonde6 ай бұрын
@@kraijom319 The Japanese did even attempt to create a pro-Japanese Islamic state in Central Asia. Long even before Hitler sought to materialise alliance with the Muslims, the Japanese nearly achieved this task. That's why during WW2, the Soviets and Chinese had to carefully patrol the region due to the pro-Japanese attitude among these Central Asian Turkomens.
@poltergijstt5 ай бұрын
Please never stop making content
@KennedyJr20245 ай бұрын
And he should always have the same music
@zhcultivator6 ай бұрын
Please Jabzy, include sources in your videos please
@ottomanosman24636 ай бұрын
To be honest, as a Turkish person myself, I am fascinated to study about supports from the Muslim world to Japan and Germany here. The support for Germany prior and during WW2 is well-known as you explained (German officials wooing Muslims of Palestine, the Balkans and Iraq), but the support for Japan is somewhat overlooked. In fact, during Japan's rapid conquest of Southeast Asia, the Muslims in modern-day Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Indochina hailed the Japanese conquest; whereas Indian and Sri Lankan Muslims rebelled against Britain; whereas Central Asian Muslims (in both Soviet and Chinese parts) were excited with the prospect of an Islamic-Japanese alliance to fight Russia and China. Japan's puppet armies in Asia included a lot of Muslim groups, such as Azad Hind (for India), Thai Muslim corps and the Islamic battalions of Dutch East Indies. At least before the war turned tie in favour of the Allies. I feel the German and Japanese impacts have never truly faded to even today, and still very vivid.
@teamjam28636 ай бұрын
Muslims were divided in sea about the issue. Main stream nationalism hated the Japanese and Western powers. The Japanese committed genocide against some Muslim population . Those who supported the Japanese were either desperate or promised independence which was a lie.
@kalatiso55415 ай бұрын
Same arabs that turned their blind eye on the Turks
@SCOTLANDforEVER129765 ай бұрын
This is wrong you know that Muslims india is who started and supported to stand against colonizer, amd there is no evidence of supporting what kind of support you means? If you don't know the history of Islam qhen they ruled they did nring justice to its region and that by itself is negative side because they will think that everyone is like them you have the historical records of when Mongolia attacked them or when the al andalusia fall so you can see the full picture there
@yazovgaming5 ай бұрын
Azad Hind were Hindu Nationalists LMAO
@edmurks2365 ай бұрын
Which types of Muslims are we talking about?
@rursus83546 ай бұрын
So the answer is ... not applicable. There were Fascists worldwide, some Christian, some Muslim, some belonging to the Nazi religion. The national problems inherent in Western Colonialism caused great problems though. And there some Muslim imperialist visionaries occurred, and some other Arab nationalists creating a fictional Arab nationality.
@jonathanwilliams10656 ай бұрын
Many of the Christian fascists opposed Hitler, and some, like Metaxas, actively fought against him and had pro British policies before the war
@ottopotatum57756 ай бұрын
Short answer: yes but you cant say it cause its offensive.
@rursus83546 ай бұрын
@@ottopotatum5775 Short answer is no. It is so simplified, that even you can understand it.
@SusCalvin6 ай бұрын
Nasser and a few others would try to keep pan-atabic ideas going.
@SusCalvin6 ай бұрын
@@ottopotatum5775Germany keeps recruiting volunteer battalions. They always seem to scrounge up someone from Belgium or across the Ostfront or Poland.
@onatdeveci55026 ай бұрын
12:22 This one is false. As a Hatay native, being of Alawite descent, I can very confidently say that the people the Turkish government sent to Hatay were refugees/migrants from Hatay and it's surrounding region (meaning places like Afrin, Aleppo and Idlib) that were ethnically Turkish. Through my friend's family, I actually have a letter that a government sent to refugees from Hatay (and it's surrounding regions); saying that if they went to vote in the Referandum, their travel expenses and accommodation expenses would be subsidized by the state. The letter then added that what they did would be considered great service to the Homeland.
@onatdeveci55026 ай бұрын
Also Jabzy; you've forgot to mention Greeks of the city, whom constituted %≈2 of the city's population. I also suggest you not group Alawites in with Arabs, since Alawism of Nusayris is an ethnic religion. Many Alawites, such as Hafez al-Assad's father for example, were against the annexation of the Alawi State into Syria. Many Alawites in fact voted in favor of annexation into Turkey, generally urban Alawites. Rural Alawites (then the majority of the Alawite population) did not participate in the referandum. This has the effect of magnifying the Turkish Turnout, since, at the time majority of the locals you've classified as Arabs were of Nusayri/Alawite origin.
@intellectualcucumber5 ай бұрын
Do Alawites consider themselves Muslims?
@onatdeveci55025 ай бұрын
@@intellectualcucumber Depends on the Alawite.
@SnubbenTroddeHanVarCool5 ай бұрын
@@intellectualcucumber Alawism and Alevism are completely two different things. But unfortunately very often confused due to similar names.
@LeixWUxLong5 ай бұрын
One mistake bud, Afrin is ethnically Kurdi including the Ezidis.
@tacticalboii43026 ай бұрын
Muslim divisions germany had 13. Handschar Free Arabian legion Azerbaijani legion Idel ural legion (tatars) Skanderbeg division Sandzak battalion North caucasian legion Osttürkische SS
@kazmahamza31156 ай бұрын
Too many foreign soldiers for a racist state if you ask me
@ismaelnasser63606 ай бұрын
Enemy of my Enemy is my friend (uk and france ) @@kazmahamza3115
@dillanspec46 ай бұрын
@@kazmahamza3115 muslims never destroyed europe and germany that was jews
@tacticalboii43026 ай бұрын
@@kazmahamza3115 non european divisions usually were just canon fodder
@mrmr4466 ай бұрын
While of course the allies had a significant portion of the Indian Army, about ten percent of the Soviet Army and quite a sizeable French North African contingent with a smaller West African contingent, no doubt there were others in all far outnumbering those you cite.
@arooster69516 ай бұрын
As someone who has planned to create their dissertation based off ‘Operation Mammoth’ and the prior German racial views of the Kurds, I do have to thank you for mentioning previously about the rare Hitler quote in his table talks. The most important part is the big difference between being called “Aryan” vs “Germanic”, since Aryan is a very broad term which originates from the term for noble in the Mitanni Empire (and possibly the Hurrians). Nowadays, modern day neo nazis warp the idea of “Aryan” into coinciding with “White” when this idea of a white race was mainly mistranslations or based mainly on Rosenburg and Himmlers views on race. Now to be called Germanic? that MUST hint at the fact that the creation of an independent Kurdistan would fall under the area of the “Greater German Reich”, of course this is just a theory, but even the Germans like Günther considered the Persians as a “darkened race” and Von Luschan concluded that the idea of the “Nordic ruling class of Ancient Iran” were not Persians but Kurds (Von Luschan 1911 and Günther 1927) Once again, you are literally the only youtuber who has discovered a quote which others including myself helped popularize back in 2021, I can’t help but thank you. (p.s. Sherif Pasha’s letters to Mussolini and his accepted refuge in Italy provide a new perspective on a Italian-Kurdish friendship)
@TimurKhan-dn5vx6 ай бұрын
Turks already destory our friendship both against kurds italians and germans.
@NathanDudani6 ай бұрын
pLaNnEd To CrEaTe
@arooster69516 ай бұрын
@@NathanDudaniI’ll personally message you and link the video as soon as it is published. You’re gonna have to wait until May 2025, but i’m sure you’ll enjoy it. The dissertation proposal has already been submitted if that helps :)
@Bladieblah2 ай бұрын
It is common knowledge that with "Aryan race" the Nazi's were referring to blue eyed, blonde haired, white people. Whether that term has other usages historically by different actors is completely irrelevant because we know how the nazi's used it, that is just a basic fact of history
@MausyeetOfficial6 ай бұрын
The most 3 am video i would get fr
@6foot8jesuspilledpureblood825 ай бұрын
Iranians are Aryans not Arabs and it is not a traditional Muslim country.
@Kuwait_Anezi4 ай бұрын
Iranians are Indians
@honsuaman87433 ай бұрын
not worry, most Muslims do know that Iran was never Muslim and Persia neither
@JBWozEre96Ай бұрын
Indo europeans ;)@@Kuwait_Anezi
@anon-iraq2655Ай бұрын
First book written in persian and 99% after it, were written by a Muslim :)
@jaif7327Ай бұрын
did he say that?
@scorpionjaxxer3396 ай бұрын
Crazy. Never thought funny mustache man would think we are pure blooded aryans…
@OfficialUKGov6 ай бұрын
we are 🗿
@ReaperCH906 ай бұрын
If you don't know it, you should watch a video about what the Nazis actually believed (especially Himmler). They send researchers to check if Tibetans were maybe the original Aryans.
@Adir-Yosef6 ай бұрын
he pretty much picked the name from Iran so that's not as surprise
@dik9436 ай бұрын
Only the aristocracy
@TreyMessiah956 ай бұрын
Iran is litteraly called "The Land of the Aryans" Are you dense?
@CarlosPEnis5 ай бұрын
Everytime I watch/hear something about Ataturk I always picture an older Turk patting him on the back and saying "ata Turk" 😂
@onatdeveci55026 ай бұрын
Great video as always!
@happyveganearthlings6 ай бұрын
This series you have going on with the Middle East and the surrounding regions is quite detailed and nuanced, which is a rare find indeed and I greatly appreciate it. I would love it if one day you did a similar deep dive into the region of the “American South”, (good luck to you to define that without a bunch of people arguing which state should be and shouldn’t be considered “The South” lol. I think a lot of people associate the south with being overwhelmingly long established African American and Anglo-Celtic American (I know Anglo-Celtic is a termed used in Australia, less so in America. But I think a term that fits due to people thinking of White Southerners as coming almost exclusively from the British Isles) and forget the other groups of people…funnily enough the inhabitants of the lands before large streams of European and African arrivals. You have the Lumbees of North Carolina, the Melungeons of Appalachia, groups considered “Tri-Racial isolates”, canary islanders of Louisiana, the Vietnamese on the Gulf Coast, a long established Mexican community in New Orleans, Charleston once having the largest Jewish population in America, the Texan German dialect, the Marshall Islanders in Arkansas and that is just scratching the surface!
@zhcultivator6 ай бұрын
Good video, I just wish you put in sources somewhere for us to look at.
@cyborgchicken35023 ай бұрын
The sources of this are for some reason very difficult to find online especially if you're using Google Chrome and here on KZbin.... Jabzy's video is one of the few I managed to find regarding the topic.... Makes you think there's some kind of censorship going on regarding this info.... Especially with the Israel Palestine conflict going on
@hondoplays94616 ай бұрын
Stefan Ihrig's "Ataturk in the Nazi Imagination" is a great read on this topic.
@davidprosser72786 ай бұрын
What surprises me is that Mussolini's government didn't invite oil prospectors into the bits of desert Italy colonized.
@italianmapperchris31686 ай бұрын
Italy did send geologist Ardito Desio to Libya, to search for oil and other natural resources. He did find oil and in collaboration with the Italian petroleum company Agip there were plans to begin extraction. However, this was in late 1938 and operations were suspended once Italy entered WW2
@AMR_k4006 ай бұрын
Yeah their are a bunch of fossil fuels and iron ore in Ethiopia aswell , could've helped the axis alot.
@advicepirate86736 ай бұрын
I would like to thank you for your editing style. In the world of youtube there seems to be a race to the bottom in terms of spastic editing, constant camera cuts, and using underhanded manipulations in order to hijack the viewer's attention. It's the TikTok effect, great for maximizing personal views with the minor cost of destroying the ability of an entire generation to function in the real world. You do it perfectly. Subtle slow moving figures, just enough to give my eyes something to rest on while I keep my ears open. Thank you Jabzy. Thank you for not being an accessory to our destruction. I would think that it's a low bar, but the mass of garbage content that has been shoveled my way lately suggests otherwise.
@zhcultivator5 ай бұрын
Please consider leaving the list of sources for this video available so we can know where the information for your videos are coming from. Thanks as always for your videos..
@Chestermcfly4205 ай бұрын
Yes there are plenty of pictures with Hitler and the grand mufti Palestine
@stephensdygert76005 ай бұрын
Good point. The father of modern Palestinian nationalism AL-AMAN-HUSSANI met with Hitler and Himmler in 1941&1943 topic of discussion was the Final solution. There are historical news reels of these meetings for anyone to see and hear. Himmler of all people thought this guy was extreme. Himmler wanted to deport all European Jews to return Judea/Samaria/Israel. He never used the term "Palestine".
@onatdeveci55026 ай бұрын
8:18 Although there existed a campaign to make the citizens speak Turkish, it was not mandated nor enforced by the government. The campaign you are referring to "Vatandaş, Türkçe Konuş"; was organized by university students, Türk Ocakları (which were mostly aligned with but independent from the government), or the local CHF parti chapters. There were instances where laws were passed (mostly in western Anatolia) that mandated speaking Turkish in public. It should be remembered that there was no organized effort to coerce or force the citizenry into speaking Turkish, both legislative and practical action varied by locality. For this I don't think it to be correct to connect the "Vatandaş, Türkçe Konuş" campaign directly with Atatürk.
@ryanmoore62595 ай бұрын
It's a mixed bag; the Mufti was considered a joke until after the war, and even many who did support the Nazis did so more because they hated the british and french occupiers
@melm2955 ай бұрын
No he wasn’t. His nephew Arafat continued To Fight Hitler’s war w help from Nazis who fled to Middle East.
@Bladieblah2 ай бұрын
He wouldn't be there leader if he was considered a joke, that is just not how these things work. Stop the mental gymnastics
@pm.meowth48509 күн бұрын
That’s not true, they 100% supported nazism, there was a Muslim SS division you have to be a fanatic to join them, supported a white man’s genocide now it’s gone full circle… history is crazy
@pm.meowth48509 күн бұрын
That’s not true, they 100% supported nazism, there was a Muslim SS division you have to be a fanatic to join them, supported a white man’s genocide now it’s gone full circle… history is crazy
@jayfreechavez00005 ай бұрын
Great educational content
@mistymoonshine8976 ай бұрын
Mussolini was not antisemite and a quarter of italian Jews were members of the fascist party. some anti-Jewish laws were passed in 1938 for the purpose of an alliance with Germany but were never really enforced. in short, it's not strange that Jews were working with Mussolini. at the time, Germany and Italy were not friends, they almost went to war in 1934 over Austria.
@smortv96296 ай бұрын
It’s really intresting because the tripartite pact was more of an alliance of convenience then an actual alliance, Bulgaria also notably didn’t give its Jews to Germany
@SusCalvin6 ай бұрын
Italy is under practical German occupation at the end of the war.
@Alte.Kameraden5 ай бұрын
It's why I'd love to see more people remove Nazism from Fascism. Nazism even predates Fascism. Nazism evolved from German Socialism and goes as far back as the 19th century meanwhile Fascism evolved from Marxist Syndicalism and evolved over the span of the Great War into a new movement. One is built around the idea of the Totalitarian Corporate State and the other a Social Democrats Racial Religion were the Bourgeoisie are the J*ws and the end goal is the racialization of the means of production. 😂
@davidjacobs85585 ай бұрын
I heard some where the surname "Mussolini" derived from Muslim. ie, his ancestor was a Muslim.
@SusCalvin5 ай бұрын
@@smortv9629 In the German ideal vision, post-war Europe would have been Germany and a bunch of client states with second-class people. And others just depopulated and colonized with germans.
@aidanpysher27646 ай бұрын
I remember seeing a Fez with an SS insignia in a WW2 museum a while ago, and I was taken back at the fact that something as odd as it didn't seem far-fetched.
@icysaracen30546 ай бұрын
Feels like I just watch the worlds greatest poker game
@edmurks2365 ай бұрын
Politics in the Middle east are a longstanding bloody minefield. Sounds like its just more of the same today nit much has changed just moving around the deck chairs. Incredible account of the history/politics or the region.Thank you.
@zhcultivator6 ай бұрын
Please put in lists of sources in your videos in the future....
@guystevens5739Ай бұрын
Just Google it yourself.
@jordam2005 ай бұрын
Hi i was wondering if you could put this stuff on spotify as a podcast? I need more long car ride material.
@mrmr4466 ай бұрын
While of course the allies had a significant portion of the Indian Army, about ten percent of the Soviet Army and quite a sizeable French North African contingent with a smaller West African contingent, also the largest part of the Yugoslav resistance and its' Albanian equivalent, I've no doubt other forces I'm forgetting totalling far more than the Axis allies. Not seen whole vid hoping this gets a mention.
@NobleBoss6 ай бұрын
Fun fact, there were more dutch soldiers that fought for the Axis than the allies. And also the last defender's of Berlin were French SS soldiers.
@SusCalvin6 ай бұрын
@@NobleBossThe local fascists in Belgium run a big anti-communist recruitment drive I think. They try to do the same in half-pacified Norway.
@whosthatguy83966 ай бұрын
What is the background music especially around 14:30
@kalatiso55415 ай бұрын
You forgot to mention that those pogroms were latter dismantled by attaturks government, their leaders executed and the 15k Jews were able to return to their property in Istanbul.
@JabzyJoe5 ай бұрын
Ataturks government post-1939?...
@kalatiso55415 ай бұрын
@@JabzyJoe yeah I posted both comments at the same time, look foward to the next episode :)
@EgyptianChiefKeef6 ай бұрын
This is actually a pretty interesting topic you’ve brought up. While initially the Nazis were somewhat successful in trying to gain Muslim support by promising “liberation from Britain and France”. They were eventually unsuccessful because more and more people found out about the Nazi crimes and some even joined the allies. The majority of Muslims that served in WW2 that weren’t from countries that were allies, joined the allies not the Nazis.
@jonathanwilliams10656 ай бұрын
That’s straight up false Most Muslims may have fought for the Allies because they were from allied countries, but those from non allied countries, and many from allied countries, flocked to the SS Hitler’s best pall was the grand mufti of Jerusalem, who would try to finish what he started just 2 years later
@EgyptianChiefKeef6 ай бұрын
@@jonathanwilliams1065 he was initially somewhat successful but ended up unsuccessful. There were very little volunteers from countries that weren’t under British and French rule and he had no reason to appeal to those who weren’t under British and French rule. I’ve meet Muslims who lived during ww2 and they weren’t pro nazi. The majority of them were actually fascinated by the soviets and the Soviet army which is what led to many Muslim countries almost becoming communist. You mean to tell me they were pro Nazi and communist at the same time? Please read or study
@SusCalvin6 ай бұрын
@@EgyptianChiefKeefThe Soviets would keep a lot of influence in places like Egypt through the cold war. A lot of these places still have local communist or socialist parties.
@EgyptianChiefKeef6 ай бұрын
@@SusCalvin Had Turkey not joined NATO, communism could have spread in the Middle East
@minestar22475 ай бұрын
@@jonathanwilliams1065 what do you mean by "finishing the job 2 years later" that's absolutely unrelated
@huseyinsartas96595 ай бұрын
12:15 I would like to make a correction. Ataturk never applied to the League of Nations, but Ataturk was personally invited by the British and members of 29 states.
@ItsBillTV5 ай бұрын
Muslims? Algeria participated in the war against the nazis. Majority of muslim countries were occupied by the west at that time. What a ridiculous title.
@bunnystrasse5 ай бұрын
Grand Mufti of Jerusalem was friendly towards Nazis.
@bunnystrasse5 ай бұрын
Algeria was forced to as it was colonized by France.
@Xiahoud5 ай бұрын
Exactly. Millions forced to fight and die in WW1 and WW2 on the British or French side. Just for a few racists and KZbinrs seeking views jump on 21st century Islamophobia wherever they find it.
@Alte.Kameraden5 ай бұрын
To be honest Fascism and Nazism should be split from eachother. Most Fascist movements rejected the Racial Variation of Nationalism that dominated Nazism. Most Fascist movements that did adopted it modeled themselves after the Nazis not the Italian Fascist. So the fact Nazism is considered Fascism is more of a misinterpretation of the time that has echoed into the present. TIKhistory has two good videos on Mosley which describes this divide quite well. How Mosley modeled his movement off the Italians but was in direct hostility with the British Union of Fascist under Mosley and the Imperial Fascist League which modeled itself on Nazism.
@FoxariumForever5 ай бұрын
It is reasonable to understand National Socialism as the very unique and organic movement it was. But it's unfair to completely disconnect it with Fascism, which is its core political philosophy. During the 1920s and 1930s, the main thing that divided Fascist movements (including National Socialism) were more so national interests than anything, of course there were rather minut ideological divisions, which were also influenced by national interests. The reality is that you won't really find any philosophical differences between Fascism and National Socialism when you realize that Fascism is not an ideology, but a political philosophy that movements connect to. Most people attempt to divide National Socialism and Fascism by utilizing Italian Fascism as the differentiating factor, but that falls flat since Italian Fascism is the Italian realization of Fascism, rather than the all-sayer of Fascism itself - and obviously, Mussolini is no Marx of Fascism; Fascism has no Marx. That being said, all European Fascist movements (Even Italian Fascism) at the time recognized the reality of race and embraced it. Though, not to the extend the National Socialists did as they were Germanic-centred and believed that the Germanic race should be the leaders of the white race. Speaking as a Fascist myself.
@Alte.Kameraden5 ай бұрын
@@FoxariumForever Well that was a load of garbage. Italian Fascism is the "Realization" of Fascism itself. THEY INVENTED IT. The Nazis didn't call themselves Fascist, evolved independently, and built their system off the Nordic Social Democratic Model, sure they borrowed from the Italian Fascist but so did they also borrow from the Marxist. Hitler himself even stated Fascism may work for Italy but will not work for Germany. When the Germans took control of Northern Italy in 1943 they didn't re-establish the Italian Fascist Party, but created a completely new government under National Socialist beliefs. The Nazis also oppressed and arrested the Fatherland Front leaders, ie the Austrian Fascist Party. The British who adopted Italian Fascism vs those who adopted National Socialist beliefs also clashed with each other in Britain. These are not the same ideologies. Claiming your a Fascist doesn't change that. Definitely being most modern Fascist have been poisoned by post war Nazi and Fascist Larpers who sometimes even belief Marxist propaganda about Fascism. Most famous example of this is National Bolshevism which literally just recreated Nazism, because they assumed Nazism was Capitalist at it's core. So removed the "Capitalist" elements which never existed to begin with. This same confusion is the primary reason the British Union of Fascist and the Imperial Fascist League basically went to war with each other in Britain. British Union of Fascist adopted the Italian system while the Imperial Fascist League Modeled themselves off National Socialism. Both ideologies directly clashed with each other. The only reason the Imperial Fascist League called themselves Fascist was because in Britain everyone called the Nazis Fascist. So similar to the British Fascist (another earlier group) they called themselves Fascist without realizing what Fascism was, btw the British Fascist under Rotha Orman were literally pro capitalist feminist who were anti Marxist, they never bothered to learn what Fascism was but can be best described as Larpers. Which is a common thread. You even see this today with the book Socialism of Duty, where the author literally uses Julius Evola as a bridge to marry Fascist and Nazi beliefs together... basically EXACTLY WHAT THE MARXIST DID... like Umberto Echo, and the author of Socialism of Duty considers himself a Fascist, yet believes Marxist propaganda on Fascism.
@wowfly64855 ай бұрын
@@FoxariumForever The first national socialist party which was from Czechia (biggest influence on German Nazism) predates the first national syndicalist party which was from France, National Socialism (although not Hitlers particular brand of it) predates national syndicalism. Fascism means Trade Unionism and Syndicalism is trade unionism hence why Mussolini's party was called the National Fascist Party, Mussolini said "What I am, I owe to Sorel.", Sorel was an influential French Syndicalist who influenced and supported Mussolini. In terms of economy (Keynesian Influenced) Socialism(nazi) and Trade Unionism(syndicalism/Fascism/Corporatism) are two different economic systems. And in terms of Nationalism, Hitlers Nationalism was based on race, Mussolini's was not race based see this quote, "Race? It is a feeling, not a reality: ninety-five percent, at least, is a feeling. Nothing will ever make me believe that biologically pure races can be shown to exist today". Philosophically Italian Fascism is almost purely Hegelian whereas Hitlers Nazism has influences such as the Völkisch movement, Hegel(to a lesser extent), Darwin and Nietzsche (Hitlers Nazism is also much more spiritual then Fascism). The Austrian nazi party was in violent and political conflict with the Austrian fascist party with Mussolini supporting the Fascists (including military support) and so the Austrian Fascists (Vaterländische Front) made the Nazi party illegal in Austria. The fatherland front like the Italian Fascists did not accept the racial ideology of Hitler. The idea that Nazis were Fascist is Marxist propaganda to try and make nazism not thought of as socialist. Marxist Socialism/Communism(international), National Socialism, Revolutionary Syndicalism(trade unionism) and National Fascism(trade unionism/corporatism) are all related ideologies based on the idea of a public sector (government or trade union) control over the economy. Marxism & Revolutionary Syndicalism are for the workers of the world, Hitlers Nazism for the German Race and Austrian/Italian/English/Spanish Fascism are for the Nation. TLDR: Nazism is not Fascist because National Socialism(pre german) came before Fascism(National Syndicalism), they have different economic systems, different philosophies, different conceptions of Nation/Race and the Spiritual aspect of Nazism is unique to German Nazism. National Socialists and Fascists were enemies in Austria with Italy initially supporting the Fascists against the Nazis.
@FoxariumForever5 ай бұрын
@@wowfly6485 You wasted your time writing an essay and ended up creating a nothingburger. Ultimately you fail to properly understand a basic element of Fascism by thinking that Italian Fascism is the all-sayer of Fascism as an entirety when it very much isn't. Fascism will never be and was never intended to be a single unified movement tied to one nation or another. The very fact I addressed this issue in my former comment and you still ended up making this mistake is nothing short of actually embarrassing. Anyways, the points you make about Italian Fascism are not only irrelevant, but downright wrong and you don't even understand Italian Fascism.
@wowfly64855 ай бұрын
@@FoxariumForever Don't you realize that Fascism is an Italian term coming from the word fasci or fascio which are unions(trade or otherwise). I agree Fascism can take many forms but National Fascism itself is the Italian name for National Syndicalism (syndicate is french fasci is italian) The Czech National Social Party was created in 1897, the Austrian DAP (who were already nationalist & socialist) which was the predecessor of the Deutsche Nationalsozialistische Arbeiterpartei in Austria was founded in 1903. The word Fascism was used for the first time in 1915. Please explain to me how National Socialism is Fascism when National Socialism is older then Fascism. And then kindly explain to me how National Socialism is Syndicalist. Ask yourself why the Austrian Nazis and Austrian Fascists were vehement ideological enemies of each other when they were both Nationalists from the same nation and supposedly both Fascist by your understanding.
@zhcultivator6 ай бұрын
Fascinating video btw
@nicbahtin47746 ай бұрын
18:30 lol these guys even wear the appropriate mustache
@ALIKN1-16 ай бұрын
Nah we just following the latest fashions :)
@HistoryForYou686 ай бұрын
When I saw the part where the character had a bride's outfit, I couldn't help but laugh
@SamFromItalia6 ай бұрын
Well obviously the most based regime would be allied with the most-based religion duh
@revivalist3555 ай бұрын
Jabzy , whats the name of the background sound . Sounds so peaceful
@JabzyJoe5 ай бұрын
Nevada city
@johnnail5326 ай бұрын
Enemy of my enemy is my friend?
@Kubson-gr4mp4 ай бұрын
no, its rather: evil likes evil
@mojewjewjew44202 ай бұрын
Only a fool believes that the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
@monke38426 ай бұрын
have you ever thought about making a similar series of videos about recent South american history ?
@nicbahtin47746 ай бұрын
27:12 lol some things don't change "Jews cant be thrown in the sea" Arabs: "must be a Zionist"
@ferdinanddaratenas34476 ай бұрын
Well, they have been trying for a century but they always walk away running off to the UN asking Israel to show restraint. Go for round 526 I suppose?
@EgyptianChiefKeef6 ай бұрын
That wasn’t the thought of most people back then. Muslims and Jews lived fine and then Zionism ruined it. Most Muslims don’t hate Jews and vice versa but to paint it this way is stupid and shows you’re uneducated. Also, the state of Israel has been found guilty of numerous warcrimes and is probably going to get a very small punishment for it. Anyways, please do research before commenting something stupid.
@king.g-l1g6 ай бұрын
To be honest.. The Arabs say Jews...the one who say and promoted "Zionists, not Jews" are the communists xD
@cendistbenjamin70666 ай бұрын
What is Zionist? a supporter of Zionism; a person who believes in the development and protection of a Jewish nation in what is now Israel. how could you separate a Jewish person from this? do you think you don’t believe your own self determination and protection do you believe that you don’t deserve to exist?
@nicbahtin47746 ай бұрын
@@cendistbenjamin7066 Calm down I'm a proud Israeli zionist myself even believe Khane is right. I just lough at the blind Arab hate that even this series exposes. How in their eyes you can't be a decent person without advocating to throw jews to the sea. How jews legaly coming and buying and developing land that even they enjoy cause of the increase of uppertonity is somehow evil. I love this series cause it shows how even during the rule of the ottoman empire you didn't have peace How Arabs fought among themselves.
@moosesandmeese9695 ай бұрын
So the answer is sort of but not in any meaningful way. They were under the control of the British and French so appealing to their enemies seemed like a good idea at the time, until they realized the Nazis were also a colonialist expansionist regime like those that controlled them.
@agxryt6 ай бұрын
This is a great rundown on the shitty people on all sides, thanks for this. It's frustrating that we're still hearing about the impacts of these extremists, decades later
@tenanaciouz6 ай бұрын
funny since Marxists are the ones running the culture and currently running it into the dirt. Of course they are telling you about people dead not for decades but for over a century. Pay more attention to the current people casusing issues in your nation rather than people who have no power in other nations that say words you dislike
@ラーメンのボス6 ай бұрын
You seem like a liberal, might want to do some introspection before calling others shitty people
@danielshoudy2655 ай бұрын
Ataturk always fascinated me. He was definitely a unique leader. Not a Stan of his but he definitely was overall a good leader for his nation and the world to a certain degree. I have issues with certain actions of his but he is interesting as you said he’s hard to pin down.
@damham56896 ай бұрын
There were Americans who supported Hitler too. Even IBM and father of President G HW Bush and Grandfather of President G W Bush, late US Senator Prescott Bush supported Hitler and became wealthy doing so.
@christianweibrecht65556 ай бұрын
How is that relevant to this video?
@barryirlandi42176 ай бұрын
@@christianweibrecht6555every people had their AH supporters
@MetatronsRevenge6136 ай бұрын
IBM made machines that did the shoah en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust
@CivilizedWasteland6 ай бұрын
many major industrial figures supported hitler before ww2 because they were at odds with big finance and people of wall street. By 1945 big finance took over most of america's industries and then gradually over a period of time the rest of the world.
@lv76036 ай бұрын
🙄 “what about”
@armanriazi5135 ай бұрын
Reza shah, father of modern 🇮🇷 ❤ Reza shah rohhat shad (rest in peace)
@austinblair98696 ай бұрын
Its called a world war for a reason..
@meinkanal74385 ай бұрын
Where are the sources?
@memetv528286 ай бұрын
Team Germany and Turkey now🇩🇪❤️🇹🇷 👇
@roderik30595 ай бұрын
Turkey didn't even fought...🦃
@JustYourRandomTurk5 ай бұрын
@@roderik3059overused joke. 0 laughs :)
@roderik30595 ай бұрын
@@JustYourRandomTurk Maybe I'm lying. What Turkey did in World War II?
@JustYourRandomTurk5 ай бұрын
@@roderik3059 nothing. lol. better than spending millions of dollars as a newly founded republic and losing half our population tbh
@roderik30595 ай бұрын
@@JustYourRandomTurk So why the hell do you writte team Germany Turkey? Ridiculous. 😂
@tylertomlin39116 ай бұрын
Ey new episodes!
@sourpusstv79846 ай бұрын
Source?
@hamodalbatal4645 ай бұрын
They absolutely did, other day I was reading some old archive news from 1930s where I saw in news papers a huge denomination in Aleppo, Syria, where they shouting “No Monsieur Or Mister, Allah is in heaven and on earth is HEDLAR” لا مسيو و لا مستر، الله في السماء و على الارض هايتلار
@FreePalestine074626 ай бұрын
Note: Yazidis are Kurd 19:54
@araratamedi5 ай бұрын
Thank you , truth is they're the most pure Kurds , they speak Kurdish , and have their prayers in kurdish.
@RatselmeisterАй бұрын
In Egypt the still honour Rommel till today. Dont think they do that with any british occupier.
@Charlie-hp2oh6 ай бұрын
where does all this information come from ?
@Ramirez837866 ай бұрын
History books. Not wiki
@zhcultivator6 ай бұрын
Interesting history here 🤔 this potentially has many alternate historical ramifications......
@redtje9436 ай бұрын
Morocco defended a lot of jews
@VictorianTimeTraveler6 ай бұрын
I heard Alternative Hypothesis give an interesting argument that the axis could have won World War II if they had invaded the Soviet Union through Persia and captured the oil fields.
@alkopolityk6 ай бұрын
Jabotinsky/Zhabotinski/Żabotyński is read like dr Zhivago. He and his movement of Zionists-revisionists are an interesting topic on their own. They strived to build a "new Jew" similarly to fascists aiming for a "new Italian" and they cooperated with Polish radical nationalists since they have common purpose - to make Jews move out of the Poland. It was also Zionists-revisionists who played the most prominent role during the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising.
@barahng6 ай бұрын
His talk of building an ethnic homeland and creating living room by clearing out the natives sounds more like mustache man though.
@ocularpatdown5 ай бұрын
@@barahngwow, that’s a real 💩ty take.
@JS-fm4zy5 ай бұрын
quick answer, yes. Muslims and nazis have a lot in common ideologically
@GuidedPirate5 ай бұрын
Dumb title. Thought this was an educational channel
@JabzyJoe5 ай бұрын
Would you prefer "An in-depth look at the Foreign Policy of Islamic Nations between 1930 and 1939"?
@firasahmed57434 ай бұрын
@@JabzyJoe yes, yes we would
@JabzyJoe4 ай бұрын
@@firasahmed5743 will you agree to donate for the loss of income?
@firasahmed57434 ай бұрын
@@JabzyJoe dont you have better things to do with your time
@inovakovskyАй бұрын
@@JabzyJoe Don't you already have an IRL job outside of KZbin?
@lavishkirad58165 ай бұрын
Noziees Called them as "Half apes". Were using them as allies in Middle East to conquer later. "It was like giving hope to a chicken before the day of supermarket meat sale.
@TheZerech6 ай бұрын
One big mistake made in the video is the implication that the Havara agreement was signed by the Revisionist movement. It was signed by a member of the Labor movement and was opposed by the Revisionists. As to the situation in the British Mandate, the fact remains that Britain could have saved millions of Jews from the Holocaust, and didn't largely because of Arab pressure. In fact at the Evian conference only one country in the entire world, the Dominican Republic, offered to take 100,000 Jews. They ended up being able to take only a couple thousand because the war broke out. It should be noted that Jews were able find refuge in Shanghai also, but that was because it was basically an international free for all zone. I personally dont know why the Israeli War of Independence refers to the '48 war and not the struggle against Britain which ladted for several years and was quite bloody. Indeed it was the first and arguably most significant British Colonial defeat by an indigenous insurgency after the war. British troops ransacked Kibbutzim and drew swastikas on the walls. Some of them were ww2 veterans, how they saw camps and then three years later found themselves drawing swastikas, I can't fathom.
@SusCalvin6 ай бұрын
Britain and the others are placing their own immigration controls in the pre-war years. Germany starts to confiscate property of all Jewish exiles and refusing these now impoverished Jews in the UK etc re-entry. They have some idea that this will spread the "Jew problem". Jews in the UK have to fund refugees themselves.
@mojewjewjew44202 ай бұрын
The dominicans only wanted to take them for the blanquamiento policy, also the Js deserve what they get for 0ppresing the arabs.
@bernd_das_brot69116 ай бұрын
I fucking love these ME videos
@67nairb6 ай бұрын
22:14 that looks just like Saddam Hussein.
@alter36026 ай бұрын
🤯🤯🤯
@67nairb6 ай бұрын
@@alter3602 Is that supposed to be Saddam Hussein?
@Herr_Floki_San5 ай бұрын
I don't need to watch this the answer is yes.
@rickwilliams9676 ай бұрын
Two groups of insane murders? Yeah, prolly.
@Moh3-rekibi6 ай бұрын
the christians murdered an entire continent
@thesaracen39926 ай бұрын
guess who is the biggest murderers of all time , yup , the west , britin , france , and USA .
@manofwar23546 ай бұрын
Yes jews and europeans
@randomperson-uj4bp6 ай бұрын
@@manofwar2354 I disagree with both: Japanese and Germans
@manofwar23546 ай бұрын
@@randomperson-uj4bp both germans and japanese did was retaliation to invaders Read what in ww1 did to germany and how nasty america was to japan
@TheVanpablo795 ай бұрын
Spoiler: many did, many didn’t. Cheers
@shadhinov6 ай бұрын
brother muslims are all over the world, and outside of the middle east. bangladesh for example is a Muslim nation. was under British rule, and fought the axis ferociously in ww2. chittagong, was a major frontline in the asian theatre. meanwhile "christians" were also under the nazi team. but we can't say "did Christians support the nazis". add to that- the decision of states are not the same as the decisions of the people. as a history and anthropology enthusiasts you should understand the difference between ethnic groups, state, religious groups and nationalities. so yeah, the title of your video should be "did the middle eastern states support the german reich"
@FF-le3ps6 ай бұрын
Your forgetting that we muslims who fought in any side of ww2 were just used as canon fodder, wether it was for the western allies, axis or soviets
@vaingloriant6 ай бұрын
The title is a question. As all things, there is nuance, which is touched upon in the video. The answer to that question should be reached by the viewer with the information provided. He never claims that Muslims as a group supported Nazis, and provides instances where there was a conflict of interest. The reason there is no "did Christians support the Nazis" video is because nobody's actually thinking about that, meanwhile the question of Muslim loyalties is much more obscure. And why would he need to clarify about it being Middle Eastern Muslims? The video is part of a series ON the Middle East. The fact it's about Middle Eastern Muslims should be obvious, even with the title.
@NoUsername5346 ай бұрын
@@FF-le3ps Only true muslims did not fight in the war but those who did are not real muslims
@FF-le3ps6 ай бұрын
@@NoUsername534 tbh the vast majority of Muslims who fought in ww2 had little to know choice, either forced through gunpoint or starvation
@ottopotatum57756 ай бұрын
South asian muslims did ut cause they were forced too
@jadadra37295 ай бұрын
Fawzi al Quawiji was my great grandfather what a chad a thorn for the British from Iraq to Lebanon and Palestine. In the end it was disunity and greed that would unravel self determination in the region.
@jaif7327Ай бұрын
insane lmao, are you turkmen?
@theuniverse51736 ай бұрын
What the sigma
@hermitcrabband12085 ай бұрын
this is not like what certain people think, some Muslim still support British and some Muslim support Nazi. Because Muslim having though decision to make at that time, if they support axis power, they will be poor, if they support British Allies, it will questioning they anti colonial movement, but even when Hitler in power, he is so busy in Berlin, and never trying to help Muslim country to be free from colonialism. after ww2 end, the idea decolonisation give chance to many colony to gain independence more better than Nazi propaganda.
@nicbahtin47746 ай бұрын
"Sword of islam" just like Timur who build pyramids of skulls of Muslims.
@Ciech_mate6 ай бұрын
Yeah ironically he killed muslims than anyone
@Trump2024asw6 ай бұрын
The awards ironic like the peace prize.
@islammehmeov23346 ай бұрын
And like the crusaders wen they soups to protect Christianity but they killed and re..p christians in byzantine empire
@Juan-st6lh6 ай бұрын
@@islammehmeov2334 keep looking Moor
@silentbyte1966 ай бұрын
Bro Timur did skull pyramids in Isfahan and Syria. He also raided and pillaged Delhi on 1398, at that time it was capital of muslim Delhi sultanate
@jamesholland51396 ай бұрын
Politics can be so lethal
@kiko8u5 ай бұрын
Short answer: YES (Sahih Muslim 2922)
@History_Teller12505 ай бұрын
That Hadith is giving us a prophecy that one day the Palestinians will beat the Israelis and reclaim their land. The Israelis will try to hide but their very hideouts will snitch on them. It doesn't say that all Jews will be wiped out from the face of the earth...
@Kerem-mf9oy4 ай бұрын
@@History_Teller1250Palenazis*
@firasahmed57434 ай бұрын
@@Kerem-mf9oy cry more my boy
@roejogan93224 ай бұрын
No one can cry more than pro Hamas Muslims on the internet ya hmar
@firasahmed57434 ай бұрын
@@roejogan9322 Yes indeed, i am HMAR weapons system being sent to ukraine, lol
@leovigildrekkared87025 ай бұрын
Same absolutist ideology. This is what michael stürzenberger knifed in Mannheim was talking about.
@kubhlaikhan20156 ай бұрын
Nationalism always makes a lot of sense at the beginning then always ends with the same atrocious disasters.
@zhcultivator6 ай бұрын
Please include more sources in your videos man please.....
@drago7605 ай бұрын
Yes they did.
@ahmedbader84105 ай бұрын
Arabs in the World War I do not think that these wars are called world wars or others because the wars that preceded them are more dangerous than the world wars that were countries against countries, but from my point of view, an empire against an empire is considered a world war. In my point of view, it is not just a country, but regions extending over an area that reaches a continent. However, the Second World War did not have a role for the Arabs in this war, and no one was affected or even encouraged any country or any person. In reality, we cannot include the Arabs as a force at this time when the Arabs no longer want wars. Rather, some of them have begun to descend to the limits of extreme weakness that has become in the Arab countries. If they had power, the world would have become different from now. We must distinguish between the Arabs in the past and the Arabs in the present. In the past, they are the ones who do not know defeat and repeat that until the enemy countries fall. Rather, they pursue them and chase them for the sake of dominance. We cannot say that they were afraid of death, but they are the ones who wanted death or victory. This belief is merciless, and no one can say anything about them except that they are the reason for the security that was in their time. Now, look at how the situation has become in the hands of other countries. You do not understand how to make the world live in peace because they are not important in the world and the Muslims were the ones who united the East and the West and this led to a very large shortage in the European countries who do not know how their situation was unwanted and this caused the creation of the most hateful kind of hatred that entered the regions of the Arab countries in a barbaric form and hatred buried in their hearts from compliments to make them an example of progress and development and in reality only to make them live under pride and pride in the truth that is almost a nightmare for them any progress in the Islamic world they become in fear of returning to the dark life
@ironzombie396 ай бұрын
The short answer is yes The long answer is yes, they were Allies
@salamyaya1626 ай бұрын
They were enemies.
@justacat26 ай бұрын
not at all
@tea95326 ай бұрын
muslims fought with Britain and france
@FarisAlight6 ай бұрын
Short answer, yes Long answer, yes but also no (Muslim also fight with allies)
@ehannasir84645 ай бұрын
@@tea9532 muslims fought with them also
@lolmenx46 ай бұрын
just before i watch it if n+zis were still here they would be best chumps...100% like no chance they would be supporting eachother even more.
@brasaepenta20025 ай бұрын
The just had a mutual dislike of jews 😂
@saaduthehungryone43405 ай бұрын
Yes and no muslim can live with jews without a problem
@usibistro5 ай бұрын
You're mixing Zionism with Judaism here. A very idiotic remark.
@ekadria-bo49623 ай бұрын
@@usibistroOr zionist just a mask of anti-jew? Hmm
@Bladieblah2 ай бұрын
@@usibistroThe Mufti's statements leave no room for ambiguity, he said the Germans had found the final solution to the problem and that they should do the same just like Mohammed did at the time. You can look it up, there is no doubt he was fully aligned with the policy of Nazi Germany towards Jews
@AduckButSpain4 ай бұрын
33:43 There were 100 men at their largest extent...
@RanDom-if2ee6 ай бұрын
Based
@astratr3b3455 ай бұрын
why the F.. you link religion with nazis ???? aren't nazis christians ??? so why you didn't use that term , did christian and muslim collaborate in WW2 ???
@JabzyJoe5 ай бұрын
I feel you're someone who is always offended.
@maverick72915 ай бұрын
Actually Nazis ideology were not Christian. It was a mish mash of pagan/pseudo science/ socialism/nationalism Most of the high ranking Nazis were not Christian. And many Christians were imprisoned or killed for opposing the Nazis regimes. This includes priests and nuns.
@astratr3b3455 ай бұрын
@@maverick7291 so they didn't have pope Pius blessing, are you sure ??? , and vatican was not involved into smuggling nazzis after WW2 ???
@maverick72915 ай бұрын
@@astratr3b345 Pope blessing no. Has there been individual high ranking bishops or cardinal that helped Nazis escape Europe yes. But these were the exceptions not the rule. Many more helped the Jews escape, in fact there are statues of them across Europe of these bishops,priests and nuns who died resisting the Nazis. That being said Vatican tried to keep the status quo since they were literally surrounded by fascist Italy and Nazis Germany was not very tolerant of Christians. In fact Hitler wrote in his book that he liked the Muslim religion better because of their warlike dogma, he found Christianity too peaceful. Look it up if you don't believe me.
@astratr3b3455 ай бұрын
@@maverick7291 sorry to tell you but Islam did not produce nazism , its product of christian faith , muslims did not persecute jews , but christians did for centuries , that is a fact
@Tirana-qg1ft6 ай бұрын
Oy vey!
@berkhan10645 ай бұрын
I think this episode is good at portraying how barbarous the Brits were
@ytfghttyht66625 ай бұрын
Yeah lots of Italians Japanese supported Hitler doesn't mean you get to dehumanize them, just because some Arabs supported him doesn't mean you get to dehumanize their descendant's. Even some Jews supported Hitler, look up the Haavara agreement.