What do you MEAN "The BABY isn't Mine???" - FNAF Theory

[@CherryLite-rk7jq]

This video was delightful! You really are making some great theories out here. This is a weird one though because the end conclusion makes sense to me but the way you got there personally doesn't hold up for me. Someone else already said this but it needs to be mentioned that this theory's basis isn't strong. "The baby isn't mine" is taken at its surface level but Vlad is very clearly either wrong in his belief, or more evidenced by the snark in his duologue, straight up lying. The baby is his. They are both purple vampires. Another part that bothers me, and the last one I'll mention before praising the theory presented at the end, is the repeated idea that Elizabeth is William's golden child. I see this everywhere and have consistently thought since Sister Location came out that it doesn't hold any water whatsoever. I think about this so frequently at this point I'm probably going to end up making a YT video or a document to talk about this because there's just so much evidence that Elizabeth's death was intentional on William's part that I honestly can't view it any other way. He built a robot that counts the number of people in a room and kills the last person who's alone with it. He then told his spoiled and rebellious daughter that it was made for her, but that she can't go near it. Then he left her alone with the robot. Of course she was going to go touch it. Of course it was going to kill her. Now the end is where I think this video gets really good (from a theory perspective, the whole video is great from a production standpoint). I think the end conclusion specifically holds a lot of water. The basic outline of what I agree with is : "The Novels and Movies make repeated mention of William being a kidnapper of a child not related to the MCI. Novel Sammy and Movie Garrett are the kids who were kidnapped in each respective universe making them intrinsically linked. Movie Garrett and Games Dave are direct parallels, practically the same character. There are also links between Movie Garrett and Games Charlie (At the very least, the general fandom seems to think so) with that continuing to link Movie Garrett and Games Dave to the Novel Twins. Is it possible that Games Dave and the never mentioned, theoretical Games Sammy are the same character?" That is the core thesis at the end of this video and it is one I absolutely agree with. There's a lot that could be mined there that no one else seems to be looking for. That's a core strength of this channel, you talk about stuff I see no one else bring up that consistently nags at the back of my mind. (Probably why I feel so compelled to comment on your videos lol) By the end there's a fair bit of evidence points I do agree with. I really liked the evidence point that the Aftons are all talkative British people and that Dave is near-mute. I especially love the delivery of that evidence point, it got me laughing. In fact, this video generally as a whole was hilarious. The spinach bit at the beginning was really good. Sorry for leaving a second long comment on one of your videos. Honestly, your channel has inspired me to make some videos on FNaF myself (That and my dislike of 99% of the way people talk about Elizabeth lol). So genuinely thank you for inspiring me to actually write out some words about a franchise I don't get many opportunities to talk about. Have a great day and thank you if you read all this!

[@CandiBuunny]

I can't wait to see this Elizabeth theory come out!! Right now I still feel like she's the golden child, but she definitely has it rough still. We see William lash out at her in The Silver Eyes and there's clear neglect. If you remember you should put the link in the comments here!! Thanks for the encouragement!! It means a lot and I love these long comments

[@scarlettlucindy]

Longest comment is ever saw

[@artistturtle1425]

Was a good read, and thanks for another perspective on Elizabeth

[@onyourleft4194]

i do agree that elizabeth is the golden child, because being the golden child in a family of abusive parents/abused children doesn't necessarily mean not being abused. it just means being abused in a different way/being held to a higher standard.

[@chocomelo454]

DO IT MAKE THE VIDEO DONT LET YOUR DREAMS BE DREAMS!!!!

[@Lufio]

But even if Vlad says that the baby isn't his, it clearly is his baby, because they both are vampires. So I don't think that the "baby isn't my" line means that someone was kidnapped but rather that the father just doesn't want to care for his kids.

[@CandiBuunny]

That is... such a good point dang it hahaha

[@satsujin-shathewitchkingof6185]

Yeah,that's always been my catch. In my opinion, it means Mrs Afton cheated and they didn't know who the father was,even though the kid was clearly his based on looks

[@aaafox9955]

that’s what my interpretation is! michael being the kid, and obviously Vlad being Will.

[@redjirachi1]

One way I could see it is that Michael was conceived out of wedlock and William felt pressured to marry her. Maybe even they had him as a teenager; that might play into how much they look alike if William's not substantially older, and adds to William not liking Michael

[@minecraft_assassin1387]

Was finna say this my self but you got it better than What I was to say

[@Markcrazeer]

The thing about the immortal and the restless is he is lying. If anything it should be telling us that something we think is someone elses clearly is williams.

[@CandiBuunny]

I wonder what that would be... maybe the original springlocks we thought Henry invented?

[@Golden12878]

​@CandiBuunny I think the baby is Mike. He says he's not his child, but he obviously is, yet he refuses to love and take care of him.

[@leviasyn]

⁠@@Golden12878i like this^ maybe disowning his son post bite?

[@thepixelman4776]

@@leviasynthat could also tie in with the baby doing vampire stuff meaning that Mike is acting out either in general or because of his guilt over Dave.🤔

[@junocross]

It's just the confusing fact that Michael doesn't see himself as the baby, but rather as Clara as he states in the logbook​@@Golden12878

[@janka4820]

No hate to the artist, but in the silver eyes visual novel, william afton looks like a used cars salesman. He looks like his head would go red, and steam would come out of his ears when he gets mad. Not like a smart, calculating, cold blooded serial killer/kidnapper

[@CandiBuunny]

This is so accurate hahaha

[@thatonewitch]

*Dude looks like hes gonna try to sell me a car 200% above market value*

[@pizzalover346]

I kind of enjoy that though? Like William Afton is a cold blooded murderer for sure but like- in a weird way that's full of subterfuge. He also is a businessman and nothing says horror like playing the opposite and a corny looking business/conman being a brutal murderer becomes scary.

[@CloudMouth27]

spamtong

[@pinkushatejar]

Reminder in the posted ad Scott made for William Afton's voice actor described his voice as being "a snake oil salesman" absolutely 100% his schtick, he's not as talented as his partner Henry but is a talented businessman and talker.

[@CottonArsonist]

tbf, i just see it as "No, the baby isn't mean" despite the baby looking fucking 1:1 with their father It's likely just extra explanation to why the events of SL happened; "they thought I was you" and all Plus William canonically fucking would be funny

[@devilsora100]

Fucking 3 times at least, too

[@talkingnart1563]

More evidence: UCN Toy Chica cutscenes actively referencing a 'napping In the survival log book Mike mentions how he feels like Clara from immortal and the restless.

[@CandiBuunny]

I can't believe I didn't think of the toy chica cutscenes!! These are both great additions

[@theErratictrap]

I think she references kidnappings because William did kidnap all the children. Luring them away in secret to the backroom is considered kidnapping

[@junocross]

This argument is weak because at the end he kidnapped all of the children

[@ironwarriornlm]

Toy chica :)

[@whitebeard_d_banana]

‏‪4:46‬‏ "love that we all agreed on "Dave

[@Duckz4bucks]

Almost like there’s a new era/age of the fnaf fandom and we’re all part of it

[@zemufinman1639]

We? Who's we? There is no we.

[@Heli-draws]

7:20 Okay, but if "the baby" is Circus Baby, then would that mean that the cat is Elizabeth Afton?

[@CandiBuunny]

Hold up... hold up... that's a banger. LOVE that

[@devilsora100]

That makes him being nonchalant about the whole incident horrifyingly hilarious

[@neptuneplaneptune3367]

...Maybe the "The Baby isnt mine" but wary clearly IS could mean the Child is acually out of wedlock. Like William cheatet ore had a relationship prior to his wife, and one of his kids is from THAT relationship, wich is why he insists it isnt his when it wary clearly is....like fore example a Son he dosnt seem to give a shit about but looks EXACTLY like him. Like imagine it like this, Will and his Wife are just gotten married and suddnly child services show up with a young child and say "This is yours" he isnsits it isnt but as the Child even now looks like a carbon copy of him its wary clear its his. And that could be why Micheal is lashing out at his younger brother. HE is being aknowleged, hes acually treatet like part of the famaly. While William makes it awrey day wary clear he ISNT his son no matter what anyone says. Wich results in him bullying his wimpy crybaby brother

[@CandiBuunny]

Super super cool theory! It would be hilarious if this is the case and we get information about his mistress before we get information on Mrs. Afton

[@midgematic]

I love this theory omg!!

[@sumsumplays]

I suppose williams wife could be hernys ex wife. Perhaps she took dave with her hence the wound on him?

[@neptuneplaneptune3367]

@@sumsumplays Hmmm..i doubt it. It would be more the other way around if anything, maybe Charlie and Dave are twin siblings but the mother nly got custody over Charlie when she left fore Henry, wich would only further spark the hatret William has fore his former friend. Wich would turn Charlies death into a "If I cant have her as my daughter neither can you" situation but that makes this hole mess honestly just too complicatet.

[@deadpool123-z9w]

I don’t believe will is a serial killer but not a cheater

[@KNightshade6]

I had always thought of it as "the baby isnt mine" no that baby is most certainly yours but maybe not anymore. Like Mike is 100% without a doubt Williams son, however he got his brother killed and so now he got disowned and is no longer his son.

[@lamsjamdiy6081]

I really love this theory but I’ve always believed that the “wound first inflicted on me” is talking about how in fnaf 1 the newspaper says that the murderer was arrested. I feel like Henry might’ve been framed for the murder and that’s why he’s absent in fnaf 6. That’s also why his daughter Charlie is bullied by the other kids and he isn’t there to protect her

[@CandiBuunny]

I like this interpretation! It works without having to bank on Secret of the Mimic proving something

[@ZuzannaTS]

I mean, Afton really is pretty immortal and Mike works nights so restless lmao

[@CandiBuunny]

TRUE

[@lazyaceofspades-g5k]

1:12 I think that when making robo-Charlie, Henry wanted to add all her memories but adding the part where she gets kidnapped might be bit confusing and traumatic for her so he probably altered her memory and made her think sammy got kidnapped

[@Dreagon-yc3zq]

Exactly, other people would probably talk about Real Charlie for years to come, meaning roboCharlie would hear about it, there would have to be memories. It doesn't make sense how she didn't catch the fact they were talking about her, but I'm guessing Henry just told the story a bunch of times with it being Sammy instead

[@pengoschwortz4734]

I think “the baby isn’t mine” literally references Baby It mentions that it eats a cat and what do we see Baby do? Eat a girl. In the logbook Mike says he relates to Clara. It could be a metaphor for him confronting Afton about making Baby but Afton constantly denies he made the machine

[@CandiBuunny]

I like this for sure. Straightforward and self-contained explanation.

[@Twig7767]

16:44 oh my god i think you just showed me why i actually enjoy consuming fnaf theory content. they're my new favorite, this one right here.

[@CandiBuunny]

That's so great! I love fnaf (if it wasn't obvious)!!

[@Blackbimbx]

I always saw it as he disowned Mike, and that is why he said the baby isn't his. As in, he never forgave him for what happened to crying child so he doesn't acknowledge him as his own anymore.

[@CandiBuunny]

This is a clean and simple explanation and though I obvs didn't go that way with my theory, I still like it a lot

[@Blackbimbx]

@CandiBuunny I'm happy you like it! The way I see it, it could also show that Mrs. Afton was trying to remind him that he is still his son. To be like the mediator of the situation between them seeing as Mike looks just like William.

[@ExodaCrown]

I joking came up with the theory, that William is convinced that Michael was the product of an affair between Henry and his wife. So when the bite incident happened he killed Henry's kid in retaliation. So the baby isn't mine could mean, he thinks it was conceive through an affair. In the silver eyes, Charlie is convinced Sam was taken and killed. If youhave a memory of part of a child murder spree with your brother and your "alive" then assuming your brother was taken is understandable. What is actually confusing is how the town confused. They might have been misremembering which twin, but the story started off with a memorial of the dead kids.

[@nickythehickey]

about the second paragraph; the memorial at the beginning of tse was for the five kids from the mci and didn’t actually include sammy/charlie at all. it’s explained in the books that fredbear’s was in a different town and that henry didn’t move to hurricane (and subsequently open freddy’s) until after charlie died, so the people in hurricane only would’ve known about the fake charlie and not sammy

[@Zoyd4]

To be honest, I always thought that Vlad was saying, “the baby isn’t mine” was just William denying Michael was his son or maybe cc because he’s crying all the time and being an “embarrassment”

[@MrAppleSalad]

The biggest issue with this theory to me is why would William care about Dave if this was true? Yeah William was neglectful and potentially abusive toward Dave, but after he got bit he seemingly did a heel turn. He was by Dave's bed as he was dying, offering words of encouragement and genuinely seeming upset. He literally was saying "I'm here" as if to comfort him, and trying to put on the act of being his plushies, saying "we're still your friends". What other motive would he have to say these things if not to try and offer comfort to Dave? Then, of course, there's the line "I will put you back together", and the implication that William began conducting the Remnant experiments in an attempt to bring his son back to life. I really don't think he'd do all that if he didn't at least SOMEWHAT care about him.

[@CandiBuunny]

This is a great counterpoint tbh. Very fair argument

[@sunteeththegenderpunk6414]

i agree tbh along with some other points but if i were looking for a way to wave this point away... could be anger about the experiment? i mean, kidnapping a kid is no small feat, and if he got him as a baby and hes a kid when he dies thats AT LEAST several years of work WHILE hiding him from the cops, and doing god knows what to cover up. losing him after all that would be a nightmare, but if hes experimenting with the whole remnant thing at that point, his attempts to comfort and assure him could be an attempt to keep him loyal to william if he does manage to possess a suit or similar? like i said, it seems wildly unlikely but thats just my idea

[@KiraTunks]

A new crying child name... Teacher: *taking attendance* Billy? Billy: Here. Teacher: Samantha? Samantha: Here! Teacher:... CC-Evan-Chris-Garrett-Norman-Dave? CC-Evan-Chris-Garrett-Norman-Dave: Here.

[@CandiBuunny]

And with the help of new fnaf youtubers we can add many many more!

[@Lokear]

​@@CandiBuunny I like the sound of Harold. Can we add Harold to the list for funsies? (it came from nowhere at all)

[@IwillcomebackIALWAYSWILL]

I just understand the line (the baby isn’t mine) as William denying any involvement in the tragedies related to fredbear’s either to Henry or mike

[@CandiBuunny]

I like this! As fun as complex theories are it's a nice and simple explanation

[@OriginalSparkstar]

I think you maybe misinterpreting it a bit, cause through out the cutscenes with "the immortal and the restless" Vlad SAYS the Baby isn't his BUT the "Show" says "Yes it is" by showing us the vampiric powers the baby has.

[@CandiBuunny]

Good point! If it's meant to show William is trying to deny one of his kids I wonder if it's Mike because he despises him or one of the other kids or animatronics

[@OriginalSparkstar]

@@CandiBuunny That would be my guess, as in the show it seems to be Vlad's first child as it is the only one ever talked about. And it would fit thematically as it is Michael watching the show.

[@sumsumplays]

However doesn’t necessarily mean its his. Just maybe someone related or meant to represent that while not genetic, doesn’t mean they don’t gain their behaviours

[@OriginalSparkstar]

@@sumsumplays What?

[@Rose_Haw]

Isn't the whole point of the immortal and the restless that the baby is absolutely his, but he won't take responsibility? My current favourite theory is that the "baby" is William's crimes

[@CandiBuunny]

Okay this is the funniest interpretation in the comments so far... "William! You're a killer!" "Nuh uhhh!!"

[@alexanderparker2219]

@@CandiBuunny William while standing next to a police poster, describing a killer who looks exactly like him: 'Twas my identical twin brother!

[@midgematic]

That would be interesting if true bc isnt the end of the Immortal and Restless Clara and Vlad get back together? Which could insinuate that Mrs. Afton did know about what her husband did and willingly ignored his actions... or maybe I'm just stretching 🙆

[@Rose_Haw]

@@midgematic They only get back together in the fake ending, so it's possible that it means the relationship could never have worked (or it being in the fake end could mean nothing too 🤷🏻)

[@Zender22]

@@alexanderparker2219 "It's just spring bonnie, why do you think it's me?" -poker face william

[@Toaster003]

William probably kidnapped the DCI. The way Ralph talks about the DCI in the phone calls sounds like it didn’t happen inside the building, and it’s been rumors from around town being connected to Freddy’s. Like William wore a spring suit and kidnapped kids, then brought them to the FNaF 2 location and killed them as an experiment.

[@CandiBuunny]

Really good point. I was surprised there wasn't much more in The Week Before about the DCI because we got a good amount about the Bite of 87

[@TheCyberKid707]

I keep forgetting that phone guy’s name is Ralph lol

[@RedRose21]

Im genuinely so happy everyone is starting to call C.C as Dave or David!!! ❤❤❤

[@AB.TA452]

if dave was kidnapped though wouldnt there be search parties for him? Its clear from the fnaf 4 minigames dave was somewhat popular people recognized him and knew his birthdays and crying habits wouldnt atleast 1 person there recognize that "oh this crying kid looks alot like the kid on the missing child posters henry put out"

[@CandiBuunny]

Really good points! In this theory he would have to be kidnapped as a baby, so that he would not be recognizable in 1983, and yeah probably in school/around the neighborhood for 6 months-year before his death. Both are technically possible, but idk about likely haha

[@onyourleft4194]

in the books, sammy (at least in charlie's memories) was supposedly kidnapped when he was a toddler. if we assume that a three-year-old isn't wandering freely around the neighborhood, then it's been at least a few years. kids can change a LOT in a few years, especially when they're that young

[@sokaize]

8:32 Look at the Security Logbook and there's a message from Mike saying that he relates to Clara from the Immortal and the Restless

[@PhantasieTranslate]

7:13 Don't know if someone has already pointed that out, but technically it is supported by Desk Guy being the one who built Baby in FNAF World, not William Afton

[@CandiBuunny]

Shockingly you're only the second person! I'm glad you both did because I completely forgot about Desk Man while writing this script

[@PhantasieTranslate]

@@CandiBuunny what are your thoughts on Desk Man? I used to think he was Henry, mostly because he was killed by an endoskeleton of his own creation in TSE, but since he is still around in FNAF 6, I don't really know. I mean, he could have forged his own death, and then Baby's creation would be the same in both media

[@diegosalguero6994]

10:18 "if any of this kids made it to adulthood" technically Mike did but I don't think any psychologyst would have accepted a zombie as a patient

[@CandiBuunny]

TRUE. And Mike DID need serious therapy but he couldn't get it so instead he burnt down buildings idk

[@diegosalguero6994]

@@CandiBuunny it was Mike's copium mechanism

[@sumsumplays]

Imo I think the line its not his baby is actually referring to william disowning micheal because its clearly his kid like identical to him and the women is meant to be mrs afton trying to warn him that the kid will hate him or even just micheal having a out brust. Doesn’t mean that the crying child wasn’t kidnapped though tbh could have a double meaning

[@CandiBuunny]

This is a great point! Even though it's not the direction I went, it's probably the simplest and least problem-creating explanation!

[@sumsumplays]

@@CandiBuunnyI suppose its not impossible to be both honestly, he could of still kidnapped the kid cuz like theres no doubt someone was kidnapped to some capacity even if its him kidnapping crying child from a hospital ect ect even could be something to do with midnight motorist where a kid was quite obviously kidnapped but since its from what seems to be the aftons its kinda weird 😭

[@werewolffromtheeast]

I IMMEDIATELY THOUGHT SAMMY WAS A PARALLEL FOR THE CRYING CHILD WHEN THE SILVER EYES TRILOGY FIRST DROPPED 😱😱😱

[@CandiBuunny]

Haha you were six years ahead of me!

[@werewolffromtheeast]

Yeah no seriously I thought I was crazy but then I see this video and 🤯🤣

[@onyourleft4194]

same here!!! i remember even commenting it on a game theory video a WHILE back lmao. i'm so glad to see it coming back around!!

[@phantommoon11]

Here's my take on this theory, it could be one of three things: 1. David was kidnapped by William from Henry to get back at him and later on realizing that David is the perfect experiment. I don't think he would of kidnapped David for the sole purpose of experimentation, especially if David was only a baby. I feel like part of it could be family oriented, wanting a way for Michael and Elizabeth to leave him alone so he doesn't have to parent them; a distraction to keep William from taking any accountability, assuming Mrs Afton divorced William. I do believe secret of the mimic could touch on William and his relationships with Henry and his wife, which can give us a lot more context. There's some people who theorize that Mrs Afton died during one of the fall fest fires, thus being the first inciting incident for William to go downhill, more than he was because we can all agree that William is a shitty father and human being. What always puzzled me was if Mrs Afton divorced William, why didn't she take the kids with her? Either A: William won in court, based on the therapy tapes we hear for Vanessa or B: She could have passed away, leaving William stuck with the kids. 2. Vanessa was the kidnapped child, not David. If you think about the therapy tapes and all the parallels to Vanessa and William, it starts to make sense. After all, in the FNAF movie, Vanessa is William's daughter, what if it's a sign that Vanessa is related to William in the games, but not biologically? It would be interesting to think about if William kidnapped Vanessa, but at the same time, it could be the case of Vanessa was Mrs Afton or another person's daughter that William had but abandoned, even if he won in court from the therapy tapes. Security breach is inconsistent enough so this whole idea is tricky to begin with. I always found it odd though that Vanessa was connected to William, why would Scott point us in this direction and show it to us again in the movie timeline? It might be a hint towards something. 3. David is biologically related to William and instead the MCI and DCI were his kidnapped victims in order to avoid being caught by the authorities. This does seem to be the most realistic answer, since we don't know much about David and if Scott retconed David altogether after FNAF 4. It seems very William to kidnap the children, bring them to the pizzeria and then kill them, of course with the exception of Charlie. It would make more sense timeline wise for each continuity, since William does kidnap but we don't see it in game, it's implied for sure. Midnight motorist could be used as evidence as well if you wanna go that route, but probably not. Overall I love the idea of this theory and it would be cool if Scott took FNAF 4's David/c.c as inspiration for the silver eyes, with the whole Charlie and Sammy plotline. It's interesting to think about the what if of David being kidnapped and "adopted" by William, since it would give more incentive for Michael to pick on David as a punching bag for his own abuse that William inflicted on him. What really grabs me with this theory being possible is the "first wound inflicted on me" line by Henry. I do believe secret of the mimic will give us the answer to this, but its interesting to think about if David was Henry's son and Charlie's twin or younger brother. It would give the silver eyes more merit to the continuity, if we use the argument of each timeline having similar themes. It's possible for sure, but there's definitely other reasons that could explain this theory too. I do love this idea and it would be awesome if it got confirmed in some way, either with David or possibly Vanessa.

[@CandiBuunny]

This was so much fun to read! I like the idea that the security tapes show us Mrs. Afton divorced William, William made the kids lie in court, and then she died shortly after. And it just adds to the list of horrible abusive traits of William - for him to fight for the kids because he loves them or even wants them, but just as a powerplay and to keep Mrs. Afton from them.

[@phantommoon11]

@@CandiBuunny oh exactly, the implications are crazy and I hope secret of the mimic gives us some answers!

[@daigustosanti]

Crying child is not his kid, that's why Mike bullies him.

[@DrFinesse212]

3:03 it may not be the right analogy but ill be damned if I don't relate.

[@alexanderjamesaustin]

The likelihood of Afton stealing another British accented child in America is so absolutely unlikely, the crying child has to be the kidnap victim

[@retrov5469]

I love how you make theorizing and speculating about the lore look fun, just throwing out scenarios and ideas for the sake of either making an interesting take on the Aftons as well as William kidnapping kids for a more narrative perspective. This was a treat to watch, I can't wait to see what you cook up next And here's to getting a lot more subs you're really on a roll! :)

[@CandiBuunny]

Thank you!! I love going back to comments like these when I'm in the middle of editing and starting to question my sanity hahaha

[@Billy_BoB_Billy]

also some more evidence is that both Dave and charlotte both have connection to crying like during the whole minigames in fnaf 4 he is always crying and the puppet after charlotte became the puppet she had tears running down the mask and also during one of the fnaf 3 minigames we see the puppet in the Dave crying position and one of the old theory is that Dave was the puppet but Scott decided to retcon that but if this theory were true that would mean that he didn't retcon it.

[@CandiBuunny]

I love hearing about/being reminded of old theories. It's crazy it's been 10 years!!

[@christalcavanaugh]

I have always loved the idea of crying child being Sammy. He is alive but disappeared. It makes logical sense for William to kidnap him. CC is scared of the animatronics but he loves psychic friend Fredbear. Sammy’s dad wore the fredbear costume. Plus it would make sense he had some trauma if he watched his sister get taken

[@IL0VEGREASE]

3:02 for my one of my videos that I’ve been recording and editing is about how Elizabeth isn’t William’s kid

[@CandiBuunny]

Oooo I can't wait to see your take on it!! If you remember, comment it under this vid!

[@Vixenz_67]

Ngl you just gave me inspiration for ideas on a fnaf comic I'm working on! Thank you.

[@CandiBuunny]

OH MY GOSH SO COOL!! I hope it comes out perfectly to your vision!

[@Vixenz_67]

@@CandiBuunny Thank you so much^^ Hopefully it will^°

[@theoriginalsnow8818]

I like to think that William and Henry are twins. They look so similar in official artwork. Plus, it was fredbears 'family' diner first. I think that's why Henry and Mike's last name in the official character books are never officially shown. Henry Afton and Charlotte Emily Afton. Emily is her middle name and we took that bait and applied it to henry. They are all Aftons. Afton robotics applies to them both. And Mike was Henry's son. The wound first inflicted on him, was that William took Henry's wife. The immortal and the restless implies Clara is a Mistress at first. Outright calls her a mistress. She gets a ring later in the episodes. But she is clearly a mistress at first. Then she burns down the house, and she is corrected that she burned down *His* house. Not *theirs*. I think there was an affair. And maybe they couldn't tell who's kid it was. But Henry let it go. But because they're brothers, twins possibly, Mike would look like both of them.

[@CandiBuunny]

"it was fredbears 'family' diner" I audibly gasped when i read this. LOVE this theory so much

[@grylledkeese]

out of the 10 years I've been in this fandom, I find it so hilarious that I've never heard of this theory before 😭 great video!! loved every second :)

[@Kitykitycoco]

Ngl this kinda gives some weight to my shitpost theory that William is a divorcee. Likely twice. The first marriage spawned Michael and Dave, which is why those two look like William. Elizabeth is likely a child from a second marriage, which would explain the different genetics. It's also not uncommon for people who have kids by multiple partners to favor some of their kids more than others. There's also Mike's duty to babysit his siblings. The lack of a second parent usually means the eldest becomes the defacto caretaker. This would also explain why mike is a shithead, as a parentified child may grow to resent their family. William also just gives off twice divorced loser energy. It makes sense to me.

[@CandiBuunny]

This is some solid analysis into family dynamics. Love the theory!

[@captainspock3p07]

3000 subscribers? You're at 4000 now! Very epic. I found this topic interesting. I used to believe that CC was the game version of Sammy for a while, but then I decided against it, considering we don't even know if a Sammy exists in the games at all lol. I really hope Secret of the Mimic teases at Henry's life! Maybe a letter from Henry regarding some new projects Edwin was supposed to work on, or maybe a taped voicemail from Henry bragging about his wife being pregnant with a girl, or maybe even him talking about his baby daughter. Regardless, I'm very excited for what's to come.

[@CandiBuunny]

I 100% agree I really really hope we get more Henry in Secret of the Mimic!

[@FranciscoRamirez-nb4uu]

If we asume the baby in the immortal and the restless is Mike, then maybe the idea is that Afton's wife cheated on him or at least he believed that, so he did not want to recognize him as his son. Eventually he will see that he is actually his son. Elizabeth story always feel weird to me, because we are suppose to believe she was the child William care the most of but at the same time doesn't feel that way. According to Elizabeth William told him that he made Baby for her but at the same time wouldn't let her play with her which is odd. You could say is to protect her but if he wanted that he shouldn't have said he made it for her, that will obviously make Elizabeth to want to play with it. Also the Funtimes seems to be very advanced so if he wanted he probably would be able to programme them to not attack any of his children but apparently he didn't. So it kinda feels like he wanted her daughter to die in Baby's claws, by telling her it was for her but not allowing to see it, it could make Elizabeth try to sneak alone to see it making her a perfect victim for Baby. Whether he did it out of evil or maybe because he thought that would give her daugther eternal life or something is open to interpretation

[@CandiBuunny]

This is a cool take! I always interpreted it as William being inconsistent and thoughtless about Elizabeth. He wants her to be safe, he wants her to think he does nice things for her, but he doesn't want to do the work of making her safe or happy for real. But I can see your interpretation working really well too!!

[@bigbrain1415]

You are quickly becoming one of my favorite FNAF KZbin creators! You support your theories really well and present them in a detailed and interesting way. You also have a great voice for youtube. By that I mean you sound like you are actually having a conversation with the viewer and not just reading off a script. So happy that you are getting the support you deserve!

[@CandiBuunny]

Wow thank you!! This was super kind!!

[@humptydumptysat]

This was pretty good! Love how you acknowledge this is completely speculation despite it making a lot of sense. You’re definitely one of my new favorite theorist.

[@CandiBuunny]

Omg this is so kind thank you so much!

[@humptydumptysat]

Ofc 😊

[@clarai.i.4087]

This video was so fun to watch! I can hear the passion in your voice and even if there isn’t much concrete evidence to back this up (as the majority of things in this franchise lol), it brings up a very good point and one that I think us as a fandom don’t think much about. When first reading The Silver Eyes, I got caught off guard by the kidnapping, since I didn’t know anything like that had happened in the games. It’s definitely something that I’ll keep thinking about. All in all, it was a very, very entertaining and interesting video to watch! Thank you for the video!

[@CandiBuunny]

Thank you so much this was super kind!

[@exceltruenopa]

the WHAT!!?! 14:42

[@tailssolosurfavs6275]

girl i love your theories- they may not be the closes to canon, like as im reading the comments im seeing a bunch of counterpoints BUT while hearing you talk about your theories actually make me believe the possibility of them being to at least some point real and i love that, even if it isnt really canon- you just have fun theorizing!! kudos

[@Iwoqvossik]

I always thought the implication was that Michael was the result of an affair or possibly a previous relationship. And William blames him for his marriage falling apart.

[@CandiBuunny]

Dang that's a cool idea. Poor Mike

[@Duckz4bucks]

Well then the animatronics wouldn’t want to kill him thinking he’s purple guy, would they?

[@Iwoqvossik]

@@Duckz4bucks ? He still looks like a carbon copy of his dad. In The Immortal and The Restless the vampire is trying to tell his angry wife that the baby isn't his. The baby is obviously his though. What I'm saying is the baby isn't her's and she's pissed at him for it.

[@Duckz4bucks]

@@Iwoqvossik oh, I musta misread ur comment

[@rorytelling]

I've had this thought for a while that one of the Afton kids is actually Henry's kid, and Charlie is a twin like she is in the books. But I've never been able to formulate it into a coherent theory. But part of it is Michael (if it is Michael) is actually Michael Schmidt. And Henry and Charlie's last names are actually Schmidt and not Emily. The Elizabeth version is just that William killed one of Henry's daughters and kidnapped the other, And the Dave version is David is the Sammy of the books, but he actually did kidnap him and not Charlie

[@skyenight-by8yh]

I actually made a comment on this topic in an earlier FNAF theory video, and I thought that Elizabeth could be the most likely candidate for the kidnapped kid, not just because of her blonde hair (which could’ve just been something inherited from Mrs. Afton), but a,so the age gap between the 3 kids. 😅

[@CandiBuunny]

True blonde hair green eyes is a pretty rare combo!

[@skyenight-by8yh]

@@CandiBuunny And not to mention (like I said before) the age differences! 😄 I imagine there would be at least an 8-9 year gap between Mike and his younger siblings, which would give time to adopt/kidnap one of them. In my headcanon, I’d say that it was Elizabeth, and they would’ve had Dave soon after she became William’s “favorite.” (I imagine he simply showers her with love and gifts to get her off his back, but still shows some care via said gifts.) 😅

[@joculatrixpierrot]

@Candibuunny I want to add to this that her being the 'golden child' doesn't necessarily negate her being the kidnapped kid? Like, think about it, he *picked* this child. There's something special about her, she's *perfect*(like baby), what if that's why he picked her in the first place? What is the favoritism is *because* she is not a child he had, but the one he *chose*

[@Erin.colleen]

Finally some who mentions the idea that William might also be a kidnapper in the games, great theory! I love the idea

[@sexyschnidden9702]

has been mentioned by people before

[@PayToLose-GER]

17:20 No

[@CandiBuunny]

Hahahaha this made me laugh

[@zoinky_k]

i usually tend to only watch theory videos on big channels like FuhNaff or Game Theory but i saw this in my feed and wow, im so so so glad i clicked on this! i hadn't thought of that before and i *love* Sister Location and that book trilogy... excited to see what content you make in the future :D

[@CandiBuunny]

Thank you so much!! And also oh my GOSH your pfp hahahaha

[@454ChevelleSS]

Imagine if the crying child was the one he should not have killed? How fitting would it be that William gets tortured after he tortured the crying child? But William doesn't kill him so that theory immediately falls flat.

[@CandiBuunny]

Unless he DID kill him and he is a robot the WHOLE TIME just like Charlie Bot... nahh Scott wouldn't do that... right?

[@zenvariety9383]

Depending on the theory that is possible. In one theory after Cassidy gets bit by Fredbear he is later spring locked in the spring lock suit in 1985. Yet that depends if the Cassidy Victim theory rings true. Yet other than that a good number of people believe his name is Dave. Haven't played the games or read the books yet but anything is possible.

[@RileyLastname]

you are genuinely so funny, watching your videos feels like a friend just teaching me about something they're passionate about. i'm subscribed :)

[@CandiBuunny]

Thank you!! And thanks for binging!

[@alexknj1]

Can't wait for SOTM to not clear any of this up lmao. If I have one hope for the game, it's that it confirms Edwin does not exist (I am a number one Edwin Murray hater) but if inhave a second hope, it's this getting some light shed on it, I really like the theory.

[@CandiBuunny]

I feel pretty ambivalent about if Edwin ends up being cannon or not but i do hope it confirms something either way too!

[@alexknj1]

@@CandiBuunny my main problem with Edwin is that he's just another less interesting Henry.

[@Karaya-shark1]

WHY I THINK THE SILVER EYES IS IN THE GAME CANON!!!(or at least relates to it) 1. It very closely follows the games, with dates, the illusion disks, character names, everything. Why not instead of the silver eyes trilogy being just a “oh, it’s just used to explain the stuff in the games” It’s ACTUALLY canon. 2. Charlie being the puppet and being a robot checks out. One thing in the books that is weird is that Charlie basically “witnessed” her own death. She has a memory that Henry implanted into her somehow of her own death, which could possibly be the puppets memory, and parts of the puppet went into the Charlie robot. 3. In fnaf world (which does have some canon to the games, cause why else would a ucn ending get you a trophy in fnaf world) an ending is Henry dying to his creation, baby, who in the books, is also Henry’s creation. Baby is also still aftons daughter. I feel like 2 sources saying that baby isn’t aftons creation and is Henry’s should be considered canon. And this matches up with the books. 3. The dates match up EVEN TO AFTON BECOMING SPINGTRAP. The dates for Charlie dying, Elizabeth dying(the same way she did in the games), the missing kids dying, the restaurant closing down, and in the fourth closet we see afton being spring locked into spring trap the same way he basically did in fnaf 3. He scrapped down the original animatronics(canon) used it to make the sister location animatronics(canon) and then the souls of the missing kids trapping afton and getting him spring locked(CANON) The only thing that doesn’t quite match up is Henry dying and how that can relate to pizzeria sim. The only thing I have to say about that is either henry planned out pizzeria sim before he died, or faked his death cause he didn’t really have any reason to stay around, with having a fake daughter and everyone thinks he killed people in his own restaurant. And his sister took care of Charlie anyway. These are just some things I remember about the books to make this short essay instead of rereading them, but in my opinion, the books have so much continuity with the games they are canon.

[@tristandimitrijev3195]

The kidnaped child in film is not cry child, its the one he should not have killed that started everuthing and the venguff spirit, taht will probably be set in future films as a recall. The idea makes sence it paralels explains the film that film vilian took the kid experimenteed on him and learned about remnant and then took otehr kids and put them in the animatronics, also means sister location happend already, or is happendning

[@CandiBuunny]

Watch Secret of the Mimic drop that it's a 4th Afton child we dont know about yet lol

[@zenvariety9383]

Haven't seen the movie yet, but isn't Garrett a gender swapped Charlie?

[@paulinaderegowska4757]

The one you should not have killed/vengeful spirit in the movie is the blonde boy, not Garrett

[@King_ArthurJr]

I seriously love your theories. I feel like it’s rare that you see a completely new take on something like this. But you’re always bringing the most interesting ideas I’ve seen. Also not sure if you knew this because you didn’t bring it up, but the Logbook actually does kinda confirm Mike and Clara. Says he relates to her “because everything about this place is crazy and nobody seems to notice but me.” Not sure how this fits into the repeated “baby isn’t mine” thing. But I wanted to add that!

[@CandiBuunny]

Super great addition! I wish I'd remembered and included that in the vid! Thanks for the kind comment

[@alesm9666]

With "the baby isn't mine" he refers to a father who denies his son who is obviously identical to him, it is undeniable that he is his baby. Also, it's a bit unfair to compare the situations when Dave clearly doesn't have an official voice when in FNAF 4 the voice lines weren't integrated yet, Mike would have suffered the same if his character had stayed in fnaf 4 And also, it is a fact that Dave is older than Elizabeth, TCoD establishes a possible age of 7 years, when Elizabeth in 85 was barely in kindergarten (established by the novels), in 83 She would have 2 or 3 at most, While Charlotte's age is hovering around 3-5 years old in '83 from the novels, there's no denying that as a point of reference. Also, Sammy was never kidnapped, that is a memory that Henry creates for Charlie to explain why her brother is not with her, TFC establishes that his Mrs. Emily and Sammy left Utah many years ago.

[@CandiBuunny]

Oh my goodness I just drove myself CRAZY trying to remember what TCoD stood for hahaha! All good points! Although it does seem like Scott could've given us a voice for Dave at this point through an Easter Egg, like he did with the Springlock Phone Call easter egg in Into the Pit. We get the same type of Easter Egg for the bite of 83 in The Week Before, but it's once again just words to read

[@alesm9666]

@@CandiBuunny Next year will be the 10th anniversary of FNAF 4, maybe there will be some reference to it next year, even some voice lines (I hope), mainly because the game will take place in 1979, He would have been a little kid back then, it would be great to see some cameo from the Afton! family!

[@qweqqe]

U could also include the mini game with orange man (midnight motorist) , if using ur theory it seems that that mini game shows that afton stole the kid

[@AB.TA452]

1:20 William aftons kidnaps and kills Charlie which causes Henry to spiral. Henry then gets into creating the robo versions of Charlie which takes up so much time Henry's wife and sammy leave him and Henry is alone with robo Charlies. Henry puts the memory of Sam getting kidnapped in robo charlies mind so she knows where they aren't with them

[@zenvariety9383]

Ironically that could happen in the movies, but robo Garrets instead. Yet the robot Garrett idea could see Funaff cast as an adult Garrett.

[@AB.TA452]

@@zenvariety9383 would be insane seeing a robo garett be williams assistant like in the books

[@shawnbay2211]

I like 2 think “the baby isn’t mine” is supposed 2b reflected as “this isn’t my fault.” Like mike (clara) is saying “it’s ur fault, William.” But William (vlad) is saying, no it’s not. It’s urs, Mike.”

[@shawnbay2211]

I love these unlikely theories bc it actually makes the story more compelling. I think the official story is quite uninteresting but so convoluted. The theories that have no actual evidence often ties threads 2gether & makes the story much more purposeful.

[@loganentertainment1814]

Do you have a discord? I’ve always wanted to do a video of a discord chat of me and some other FNAF fan, talking about FNAF. 🤔

[@CandiBuunny]

I don't at the moment but I'll be making a community post when I start setting up socials and like them with the channel and such

[@LadyBernkastel92]

KZbin recommendations are usually supper annoying but sometimes it gives me a cool new fnaf theorist to listen to. Solid evidence, and great sources, I'm subscribed now and will probably give your other vids a look. It's always nice to have more voices in the fnaf space that seem nice and excited!

[@CandiBuunny]

Thank you so much for the sub and the kind comment! I'm super super glad you gave it a chance!!

[@marycatherine4902]

"35 seconds ago" I'M FIRST??? YAY! NEW VID!

[@CandiBuunny]

Dude you were faster than me on my second account hahaha!

[@frankieslittlediary]

i’ve been binging all your videos while making my halloween costume and you are so fun and talented and i’m totally obsessed now! also we have a lot of the same opinions on the franchise which always helps haha

[@DrGreatScott]

“And if any of these kids had made it to adulthood, they would’ve needed serious therapy” is such a savage line and I’m here for it

[@jacobpoulton5679]

The level of craft and care put into these videos rivals that of some of the biggest FNAF creators! Incredibly thoughtful and impressive analysis, I’m stunned that your subscriber count isn’t in the hundreds of thousands!!

[@CandiBuunny]

Thank you so much!!! Maybe I'll get there one day but right now I'm over the MOON with 3,000!!!

[@fercornsfm]

I like this headcanon/theory. It makes sense considering how little is know about the crying child. It also explains why he's crying and scared all the time.

[@andrewcogdillcole3826]

I've had this same exact theory ideo in the back of my head, I'm glad I'm not the only one. What really did it for me is "The wound first inflicted on me" line mixed with the "Save him. You can't" line from that minigame. Maybe it isn't about Charlie, its about Sammy being kidnapped and Charlie bearing witness to it. Of course it would send her into a flying rage afterwards, just like with Movie Mike

[@CandiBuunny]

I would looove for Save Him to be un-retconned. Retcon the retcon hahaha!

[@jarnodc005]

Amazing theory as always. Dont think ive really heard it somewhere else. Keep popping out these bangers!

[@CandiBuunny]

On it 🫡

[@Storm_Reactor]

While everyone else is focused on the theory aspect, I just wanna say, that you have a great voice and are great at script writing, everythings so smooth and littered with funny little jabs, it really sounds like youve been doing this for a while. Great work

[@CandiBuunny]

Thank you so much! Don't get me wrong I love reading peoples' theories and critiques but it's really nice to read comments like this! Gives me confidence

[@H1myname_M]

Your Theory sounds good I love that fact and it does make sense, none of the fnaf theorist ever thought of this!

[@Verycool1isver1]

Interesting one, as per usual. Both because of the actual contents of the theory being a fun thought to ponder (great work, as usual), but also because even though I constantly see to the point that I’m pretty sure it’s widely accepted in the community that the immortal and the restless somehow references the aftons, I don’t think I’ve ever actually seen people agree on how

[@CandiBuunny]

Yeah! Even though I like my interpretation (ofc haha), it doesn't seem like there's a clear interpretation

[@mybloodbeforehers]

I was already impressed and going to subscribe…then I heard your closing line and it was guaranteed lol. Good stuff!

[@CandiBuunny]

I'm so glad you like!!! 🍬🍬🍬

[@Exclaman0]

I think a way to clear up the paradox between Henry’s “a wound first inflicted on me” and chica’s “I was the first” is to think about it this way: William killed Charlie first because of how he had gone insane because of everything happening at the time, and he was most likely drunk too because of him being kicked out of Jrs This murder was just out of rage, but he then realized that Charlie must have been haunting the puppet, and so he got curious. Then I think Chica was just the first MCI victim, and she thought she had “seen everything”, but all the animatronics other than the puppet aren’t as aware of the situation around them, and they may not realize that their protector, the puppet, was also a victim And I also think that William saying “the baby isn’t mine” when it very clearly is his is just representing how William is refusing to take care of his own children

[@jibby_0989]

I like this idea, the accents could be learned maybe but I think you’re right in saying William in the games needs a kidnapping notch on his belt like the other universes. It just tracks. Dave would be so cool, hoping ur right good vid

[@hsfhanaa]

As someone who only got into FNAF when my coworkers hyped me into watching the movie, I love this theory. Like you said, the best part of being a fnaf fan is all the different theories we can make. I love hearing every new theory and as far as I'm concerned, they are all great and have some truth to it. I was fortunate to not have the original theories in my mind when we received more information later on, so I had no "confirmed" beliefs

[@CandiBuunny]

That's so fun!!! It's super cool that you came into the franchise recently!!

[@RoseCWT]

It’s really refreshing to watch someone who genuinely enjoys playing around with insane ideas and shows that they are just insane ideas. After listening to so many older theorists theories this is so refreshing ❤

[@CandiBuunny]

Thank you!! I do sometimes love very salty takes on fnaf because they're awful funny, but it's nice to balance it out with people who are positive about the franchise!

[@GreatTrollger]

I personally believe that Immortal and Restless represents dialogue between Mike and William happening before SL, where William tells Mike that Circus Baby accidentally killed Elizabeth in a freak accident and Elizabeth's soul is stuck in it, but Mike doesn't believe it's an accident

[@CandiBuunny]

I think this is good and delightfully straightforward!

[@That-witchy-idiot]

I personally think this is a really cool theory! It would certainly be cool if Dave really was kidnapped, though it's likely he's not. I still think that this is cool, and it was super fun to watch

[@teah3511]

the way i totally agree with this,,, i’ve always thought the crying child’s parallels to the puppet are so weird but it would make sense if that’s his twin sister wtfffff

[@NeolixiaX2288-p6u]

This is such a cool idea, I never thought the sl soap opera could have lore!! Great theories you got

[@GasPowerdStick]

The show is afton and Henry arguing about who represents the company when it gets sued for afton’s/animatronic’s murders, Henry gets fed up and burns down the “house” in FNAF 6

[@CandiBuunny]

Ooo this is a unique take! Very cool!

[@kingloucifur8086]

Love this! I have a similar theory about the Crying Child we see not being the real Dave Afton, but a kidnapped kid similar to Rory from Dittophobia.

[@Snakepit_Media]

When The Silver Eyes first came out, and The Twisted ones was still unreleased, I had a mini theory/au concept that Sammy (Charlie's brother) ended up kidnapped by Dave and raised as his own, believing that he was an afton. He was a mechanic who worked at Freddie's, entirely unaware of what his father was doing for years until he one day was sent to the sister location of Circus Baby's Entertainment & Animatronic rentals, essentially making him the sister location game protagonist and I entirely dropped this concept due to disappointment of the twisted ones and the fourth closets lore reveals. It likely isn't canon, but it's such a fascinating concept to think about.

[@CandiBuunny]

It's so fun hearing the theories that were still possible earlier in the franchise!! Someone will probably look back on this vid and be like ahh back when we didn't know Sammy was HENRY ALL ALONG

[@morgann2938]

Yes!!! I'm so happy to see a theory on this. The evidence for a kidnapping might be slim (or non-existent), but in a franchise as complicated as this, it's almost odd to have two families and no child mix-ups. I kind of want the Kidnapped Afton to be Elizabeth, since she doesn't look like her brothers. Like, there's no reason Elizabeth couldn't have had blue eyes like Mike. (Or that Mike couldn't have had green eyes, since SL is also the game we first see him without the Foxy mask). But it does make a bit more sense for it to be Dave. Maybe William thinking Elizabeth isn't his biological child is what prompts him to kidnap Dave. Cuz, you know, why not?

[@CandiBuunny]

It would be deliciously ironic if the one Afton child that isn't his is the only one that's loyal to the end

[@makeithappen9741]

This is actually so good I love this, new sub!

[@CandiBuunny]

Oh thank you so much!!!

[@Rehus04]

i agree ! it's really fun that fnaf is so loose yet has a strong narrative (...narratives?) it's really perfect for theories ! this one is fun !

[@Brubie]

another great theory! this is something that will probably be looked back at after secret of the mimic or whenever a new book comes out with more similar or supporting evidence

[@CandiBuunny]

I'm so excited for Secret of the Mimic!!!

[@lewis_g]

17:27 you’re so precious 😭😭😭

[@TranzFloofyBean]

I’ve been binge watching your vids and I really like them bc your funny entertaining and make really good theories :D

[@CandiBuunny]

Aw thank you! 😊 🍬🍬🍬

[@TranzFloofyBean]

Ofc :D

[@maira3457]

I'm really happy to here a theory like this. I've been in this fandom since Sister Location first released and I really love the fact that (potentially) the story can be interpreted in several different ways. I don't know exactly when I started thinking about this but I had a similar theory, with one of "William's children" being Henry's in reality. That one in my theory was Michael though. Yes, as you pointed out, Scott chose the same voice actor for both William and Michael, but I always interpreted the line "Father, it's me, Michael." Like a point in Michael's life in which he is discouraged and maybe a bit hurt because of what he saw and experienced in the SL bunker, and therefore he communicates to his father, Henry, who is still acting in the shadow since he discovered William's murders, that he found the victims (because there is Ennard) and Baby especially, William's golden girl, that maybe his father sent him to find to be sure about what William did. Surely, William's son or not, Michael knew Elizabeth and Dave, so he could have been their "Older brother" in the sense that they grew up together. That also makes me interpret Henry's famous speech in Fnaf 6 like Henry being sad and hurt because he's finally found his daughter Charlie and has to part from her to give her freedom, but also hurt and discouraged because he didn't think his other son, Michael, would be there. I know, it's a long and complicated thing, and it also has a lot of holes and issues, but I like to think William's actions directly hurt Henry's family way more than we know. (I really need more Henry material, I really like him as a concept)

[@CandiBuunny]

Wait wait wait this is SO cool. Switching up Father its me, Michael to be talking to HENRY?? Henry is the one who told him how to find Elizabeth and he's going to come find Henry so they can put and end to William together... the only thing that is a little difficult is "They thought I was you" because it def seems the funtimes thought he was William not Henry

[@maira3457]

@@CandiBuunny I'm glad I got to share my theory and that you think is cool! ♡ I know it has a lot of issues, for everything interesting that could work there is another thing that shows how it couldn't, and there's also Occam's Razor. But thinking for a moment about the "They thought it was you" issue I should go and refresh the material given in the old games, but if I'm not wrong the whole Father it's me, Michael mini-speech is at the end of Sister location, and that's the game where we also discover the animatronics built or somehow designed by Henry (I don't remember how his name was encoded on the blue prints) So, maybe he had a part in the creation of something there (not everything because I remember that the funtimes are William's work) and they remember something Henry did, thinking Michael is him. Another thing of notice is that part in the game where baby "lures" you under the office's desk. She says that someone used to hide under there too, but I was never convinced that it could be Afton, he's not the type to hide like that in my mind.

[@huitzionbars]

i really like the idea that the crying child and charlie are related, not only is it a neat concept but i think that it brings up some very good narrative parallels

[@CandiBuunny]

I looove the narrative parallels

[@Handlelesswithme]

Theory: The reason Michael survived being scooped was because he been doing sit ups

[@CandiBuunny]

BANGER THEORY

[@scaleonkhan183]

10:14 “If ANY of these kids had made it to adulthood, they would have needed serious therapy.” 😂 11:07 LOLLL I love this sequence

[@CandiBuunny]

Thank you I was so proud when I came up with the sequence