What if Stalin Never Came to Power?

Joseph Stalin redefined the 20th century. His regime killed millions of Soviet citizens and his actions costed so much in the moment of crisis. So what if Stalin never rose to power? What happens to Russia and WWII? One guess. Everything changes.
Music by No Sustain: / @nosustain74
Check out KnowledgeHub Tanks! • Playlist
Facebook: alternatehis...
Twitter: / althistoryhub

[@smaginandrew8336]

"Trotsky, on the other hand, saw the danger that Nazism truly was." Of course he did! He's jewish

[@SMarie-zk9oj]

And smart

[@Ionotron]

And that is why he wouldn't fund German communists but waited for Hitler to win the elections against them?

[@dirtegarbage]

@@Ionotron he was deported to mexico by then I think, stalin was in control in 1924, before hitler had a chance of making it into leadership

[@necluda001]

My respect for him has grown

[@HistoryNerd8765]

@@necluda001 It shouldn't. He was Stalin without the patience and with 10 times the zealotry.

[@marcellofesta8678]

In Trotsky russia,Russia invades germany

[@MChannel80]

Good one! This deserves more attention!

[@marcellofesta8678]

MChannel80 Thanks

[@esabria]

Not necessarily. the 2nd Reich collapsed due to communist revolts and strikes. On the real timeline Germany was VERY politicised and polarized. With Trockij in power revolts would have happened again, with the difference of being the Communists and not the Nazis the victorious ones. Trockij would only invade if asked by the Germans. WHy invade if the work is being done already?

[@Eldernesh]

Not likely, if you look at the USSR they had huge military failures and lost land to the Poles who were just fresh from getting independence, if anything the USSR would be weaker and hatred towards communism would be even higher. Not to mention Stalin is the reason why the USSR was strong and industrialized.

[@MChannel80]

Eldernesh Have you even watched the video? Those failures against Poland, Finland and Japan were BEFORE the Red Army was modernized. And after watching you should know that even without Stalin the USSR would have become strong and industrialized. If you don't believe that, at least give some evidence for your opinion, otherwise you are only making excuses for stalinism while rejecting the facts we did just learn.

[@Professional_Dirtbag_Hippie]

Stalin: Joins the Bolsheviks Stalin’s Mom: You know ... Stalin: It’s not a phase mom! I have a whole 5 year plan and stuff!

[@IsraelCountryCube]

Bruhhhhhhhhhhhh

[@LeBaron101]

I do wonder what his own mother thought about it all

[@M0rshu64]

@@LeBaron101 she said to him; son, it would have been better if you had been a priest.

[@kevintan1983]

@@M0rshu64 and maybe friend with an artis

[@michae976]

And then 20 million people died

[@JamesDPate]

I think the funniest part of this video was describing the “Council of Soviets.” Being someone who knows Russian, the word “Soviet” actually means “Council,” thus it is the Union Council of all of the Councils. And the Soviet Union is actually the “Council Union.” However, I suppose the west didn’t think that “Council” was scary enough, and thus used the foreign word “Soviet” to make a name that put fear and discontent into the hearts of its citizens.

[@miguelhuaman8280]

Interesting. This should get more attention.

[@dakota6050]

I always thought that soviet just was socialist in russian fsr

[@mariasirona1622]

@@dakota6050 not sfr. SFSR. Soviet Federative Socialist Republic.

[@inigobantok1579]

I thought soviet means worker

[@maxkronader5225]

I think the fear and discontent was probably associated more with communism racking up a murder toll of over 100 million people than with the use of "soviet" rather than "council".

[@troyrichards8097]

What if Lenin lived untill the end of WW2

[@t6amygdala]

СОЮЗ НЕРУШИМЫЙ

[@azrael2948]

@@t6amygdala yeah it would be a unique union

[@t6amygdala]

@big boris I believe it means "Unbreakable Union" but I said it as it is the first two words in the Soviet anthem

[@carlosandresmojicasanabria1272]

he starts WW2, invading germany in 1933. or 34 as late.

[@GrizrazRex]

That's the plausible scenario. Hitler did not really consolidate his own power until mid-1934, and the Night of the Long Knives, and the military rebuild was not demonstrably complete enough, yet. Many parallels between Trotsky and Rohm, the biggest being their ideology of ongoing revolution. A Soviet invasion before Rohm is dispatched means a likely Soviet victory, provided that Trotsky has not made the same mistake that Stalin made by purging his officer corps.

[@mclolflick4566]

(Meanwhile in an alternate universe...) What if Trotsky never came to power?

[@gargos25]

Genius!

[@ImranKhan1976]

"Stalin was a pragmatist and non interventionist member of the Communist party. If he hadn't been arrested by Trotsky then he would have had a moderating influence on the Soviet Union especially seeing as he a Georgian originally hailing from a poor peasant family. Whilst no saint he seemed to care about the plight of the workers and it is inconceivable to see how he would have pushed through the massive social changes that Trotsky did that lead to millions of deaths. This is because Trotsky, like Lenin before him, was driven by ideology whereas Stalin was primarily an enforcer of Lenin's laws. Without Lenin at the helm Stalin as the pragmatic man he was would probably have seen the need for the large scale changes that Trotsky unleashed. Nor would Stalin have started a World War that led to a conflict with what would have been short term fascist governments that would have fallen due to their lack of proper economic planning."

[@copperfox8695]

Then Lenin.

[@AlexanderRJaruk]

@@ImranKhan1976 You fail to account for one key fact: if Fascism never falls, there will never be a KZbin for these videos to happen on.

[@Wallucks.]

They (we) would probably have painted stalin as a saint, defensive leader who could have avoided ww2

[@Adenfall]

I love how baby Stalin still had a mustache lol

[@josephstalin133]

Ikr

[@rudrakshpainuly1294]

Hold up

[@pubcle]

There's some minor mistakes in this video in relation to Stalin. Stalin didn't think Hitler was an ally, he knew that war was going to build eventually, but he believed he could shore up his industry first and that Germany wouldn't want to engage in a two front war. He also was still an absolute fanatic of communism and did believe in the workers' global revolution as we find in his private writings but was also extremely paranoid and steadily going more insane and paranoid as time went on to where his disappearances became almost random. The main reason he didn't immediately engage in global revolution is not because he didn't believe in it, but rather he was more practical and politically maneuverable than, say, Trotsky, and that's saying something about Trotsky.

[@pubcle]

@John Doe I don't know enough bout Bukharin to say on that, but I can at least say that Trotsky would have been even worse than Stalin.

[@nope7389]

He did believe in the global revolution, all communist believe in it. You can’t cal yourself a communist if you think otherwise because that’s the whole premise of it. He wasn’t paranoid, the people that were purged were always against Lenin and constantly accused of conspiring again him and Lenin with Trotsky. If he was a true paranoid maniac, why didn’t he purge the people who were with him his whole career? He was a paranoid maniac right?

[@emanuelneagu14]

"minor" lmao there's barely a few things correct

[@intergalactic92]

Stalin was basically in favour of maintaining the USSR first, with the spread of communism second. In his mind they weren’t ready to fund communist uprisings in the west, they had to get their own house in order first.

[@pubcle]

@@intergalactic92 Yep, which is much more practical and politically sound, as much as communism can be sound. Trotsky would have likely seen Russia be the target of WWII instead and Germany the sort of Cold War opponent. Much like in the video.

[@AlternateHistoryHub]

For those wondering, I got rid of the swastika because good ol' KZbin likes to ban ad revenue for showing "controversial" stuff.

[@fluffytoaster1827]

That's stupid, because you're just talking about history and not encouraging others to become neo nazis. I guess KZbin wants to erase the evil parts of history, which in part is totalitarian and evil in of itself, therefore, KZbin should ban itself.

[@fat_alsgaming]

That is dumb! That is history! That would be like banning the Confederate Battle Flag! oh wait....

[@dolantrimp1691]

what if youtube never existed?

[@HuntingTheEnd]

Yay repression of history!

[@fredy_international3803]

Hey Cody. The German flag between 1918 and 1933 (duration of Weimar Republic) was like today's German flag. (black-red-gold)

[@SynisterFour]

What if lenin never got sick and actually lived up to lead the red army ?

[@brainf_cker]

In my opinion, it's probable that he was murdered. It's not proven that he got sick.

[@haraldhetlandboe4827]

you get his point

[@SynisterFour]

Yeah sick/murdered doesn't matter ..... Just curious what the outcome would be like if lenin lived

[@jerrydinan6492]

I think it would have been even more different than our timeline and the Trotsky timeline. Perhaps we would all be socialist/communist? or instead Russia would be our (the US) Bro's a lot sooner.

[@sobitasadullah4517]

Lenin would live long enough to choose a successor and there wouldn't be purges or paranoid deaths, or at least less.

[@1craigmt]

One assumption that every "what if" scenario about Trotsky seems to make is that he would have been able to hold power indefinitely. None seem to consider the much more likely possibility that he would have been either been ousted, sidelined, or completely shifted his stance when faced with the realities of leadership within 2-5 years.

[@oli36999]

Hitler: first I sign a non aggression pact and then boom hit em when there not looking. Trotksy: I'm about end this mans whole career

[@basselwehbe8412]

oli36999 big no u

[@RE-zl7sy]

@@basselwehbe8412 no u

[@doaftheloaf]

trotsky doesn't sign that pact. he's already invaded long before 1939.

[@beep8888]

@@doaftheloaf i think he would invide Germany when it will fight with Allies

[@deadpirateroberts9937]

@@doaftheloaf They were not ready to invade that time.

[@lotubala4963]

When you use the picture of Kalinin a thousand times and claim it is Trotsky

[@cubanbread8231]

SNEAK:100

[@hoochski69]

Yes, he had a whole Oblast named for him!

[@FabioZCandioto]

Yeah thats how you know a research was done for the video lol

[@SoloTravelerOffTheBeatenPath]

Who cares, both were Commie scum.

[@SickHarbinger]

​@@SoloTravelerOffTheBeatenPath Okay i'll simplify it just for you. The whole video's point is replacing one "commie" with another, and you care enough to watch it (and even comment it).

[@conorwalsh767]

Stalins: *becomes brutal dictator over russia* His mom: I wish he had become a priest.

[@TheJadeFist]

Kinda like the reverse of the Buddha right?

[@dannyt2726]

Conor Walsh lol

[@Ares_gaming_117]

ironically stalin had ~ 100,000 priests executed because the ussr was supposed to become a secularized state which was a euphemism for the state becoming the new god/religion.

[@FlowerTrollSan]

Conor Walsh Stalin: Mom, why did you beat me so hard when I was little?? His mom: That's why you turned out so well!

[@comradelayla5635]

No mom I will become a Soviet leader and I will kill everybody muhahahahaha 😈☠

[@Penguin-qp2wk]

I'd be terrified to see how nukes would play into this alternate history.

[@averydotavi]

i know im two years late but id like to point out that the reason nukes were invented was because of wwii and imperial japan's seemingly unstoppable navy. if we presuppose that the trotskyist ussr would have funded communist/socialist revolutions during the great depression, and the third reich or the imperialist japan died in infancy due to those revolutions, then it's safe to say that nukes would probably not be invented as soon as we had them. war, not necessity, is the mother of invention.

[@bobthellama6988]

@@averydotavi Fission was discovered in 1938 not intending to create a bomb. It's possible that in the 1950s-60s either the soviets or US end up building nukes anyway

[@nugietheink2129]

1:02 Little Stalin is so cute!

[@jarrellpets]

Stalin: “everyone is out to get me.” Hitler, self described commie hater: “wanna team up?” Stalin: “Seems legit!”

[@FoxMcloud]

*Illusion 100*

[@Wafflepudding]

Not to defend Stalin, but Cody's engaging in some hindsight anachronism here. Stalin knew he'd get attacked by Hitler eventually, but he thought there's no way Hitler would risk a two front war, because that'd be suicidal. Turns out Stalin was wrong, and right.

[@avi8aviate]

Hitler: Hey Stalin, want to team up? I definitely will not refrain from not not betraying you later. Stalin: ...Sure.

[@DIEGhostfish]

I feel like he thought he was outsmarting Hitler somehow, and honestly he may have bought himself a little time and technology, just nowhere near as much time as he thought. (He probably figured he'd have till after Hitler either made peace with, invaded, or was defeated by the UK.)

[@Boo-lt9kg]

@@DIEGhostfish Well not exactly. You gotta understand that the USSR was recovering from an economic turmoil because they were far behind the rest of the world powers, three different revolutions within the span of a decade, a civil war with foreign interference to destroy communism and not to mention, the entire world hating you and not willing to cooperate with you such as sanctioning you. People tend to ignore the fact that even though the secretary general was the most powerful governing post of the USSR, it was just one branch of the nations government. So no it wasn't because Stalin was an idiot that the Soviets didn't attack the Nazis, it was because the governing body as a whole was trying to buy as much time as possible to prepare for a conflict.

[@Janovus]

The picture you keep showing is not Lenin and Trotsky, but Lenin and Kalinin

[@juhman]

he doesnt care

[@zhsjdjdjdjdjejeuebejhr6393]

It is almost as false as the rest of the video.

[@ryanchungus8972]

@EL3KTRIK you're clearly biased due to your love of Stalin.

[@ryanchungus8972]

@EL3KTRIK ah, yes, of course. I'm ignorant for not loving the person who made cannibal island.

[@kenetickups6146]

EL3KTRIK >tankie it's funny because there is no difference between you ans the nsdap

[@justin2308]

“This...is Josef Stalin.” Hello Stalin “The tyrannical dictator-“ Hol’ up

[@konigininfantry5836]

Boring

[@hatinmyselfiscool2879]

Robert Burdett i am just a elected official that wanted to resign 4 times but i’m a dictator right guys. I definitely didn’t fix the famine by stopping landlords from taking to much grain for themselves.

[@tylervann2385]

I killed like 20 million people, but ok so what?

[@hatinmyselfiscool2879]

Tyler Vann i have a random number to blame stalin on. Historians always criticize me for making stupidly high numbers already but imma do it anyways.

[@justanother7941]

@@hatinmyselfiscool2879 "Historians"

[@paperbagsheriff6072]

“The Cold War never occurs because it already got Hot” what a line

[@AlternateHistoryHub]

This video was supposed by out at 3 but my computer was wonky. Oh well! If you want to stay updated, or maybe even chat, follow me on my Twitter. twitter.com/AltHistoryHub

[@deanspanos1550]

what if the Germans won't in ww1

[@komno5451]

Love this channel

[@kylecontreras778]

Say hi to me please

[@philippeguimond8020]

Do: What if Harambe was alive?

[@deanspanos1550]

What if the Russia empire never happen

[@PayasYouListen]

It almost turned into the Red Alert scenario there.

[@maksymcazymir1727]

Kirov reporting!

[@besg5725]

Imagine if the soviet union as the first to get the nuke.

[@KM-uk2rt]

FOR THE UNION!!!!!!!1

[@ILoveNigga]

Stalin in Red Alert is literally Trotskyist lol.

[@THECOMMUNISTCHANNEL]

Marxism: Everyone is equal Stalinism: Everyone except the state is equal Maoism: Everyone except the head of state is equal Tsipraism: Everyone is equally poor

[@pancholopez8829]

What about Titoism?

[@epauletshark3793]

Most of it ends with everyone is poor.

[@vidzumer365]

Every and each one of them: everyone is hungry and poor

[@ILoveNigga]

All of them: Everyone who disagree is dead, disappear or gulag.

[@Merennulli]

I feel an April 1 story could be made from this. "What if Lenin never died." Make it sound at first like he's just going to survive longer, but then slowly start talking about the scientists researching his longevity, a cultish following growing due to his vigor at the age of 90, then growing concern in the late 70s as it becomes clear he was an undead the whole time, a US assassination plot involving salt, silver, holy water and crucifixes, his negotiations with Regan, and finally his fight with Twitter over his account being suspended due to a "humans only" policy.

[@foxstorm2920]

10/10

[@arinewell5985]

4:17 is actually Mikhail Kalinin and Lenin, not Trotsky.

[@Wiggyam]

Ari Newell is that why Köningsberg was renamed to Kaliningrad?

[@petartoshkov2076]

@@Wiggyam Yes, the same reason why Leningrad, Stalingrad and Voroshilograd exist

[@sbevexlr848]

@@petartoshkov2076 leningrad was renamed to st petersburg and Stalingrad to Volgograd

[@meem6154]

Wait then who’s the guy on the left?

[@nungbear1398]

No, that's William Dafoe

[@DuranmanX]

13:46 Stalin thought everyone was out to get him, except for the one person obviously out to get him

[@Gunfinz]

One of the most paranoid person on the planet decides to trust the most untrustworthy person on the planet. Amazing

[@jonathancampbell5231]

That's one of the points I disagree with Cody on. Stalin did not actually trust Hitler; rather, he just refused to believe that Hitler was going to invade Russia anytime soon- quite likely, he suspected that Hitler WOULD, but was in denial since he knew that Russia at the time was ill-equipped to repel such an invasion, and thus told everyone who said otherwise to shove it (or else). Stalins POV was 1) Hitler is offering me an alliance- I'll take it 2) Hitler says we should split Eastern Europe between us and carve Poland in two- sounds like a plan 3) Hitler is at war with France and Britain- that will keep him occupied for a while and give me time to consolidate my gains. Everything is proceeding according to my Master Plan! Just as long as Hitler doesn't curb-stomp France or something, lol 4) Oh, shit Hitler just curb stomped France! And most of Europe is either surrendering to him, allied with him, or staying neutral- will he invade us next? He's still fighting Britain, at least. 5) It's 1941- if Hitler will invade, he'll need to invade in the Spring or risk the Russian winter; we aren't ready now. 6) My spies are telling me that Hitler will invade in the summer of 1941- that would be stupid of him because of the winter, though we still aren't ready (note to self- purging all your best officers has it's downside; who knew?) to repel that kind of invasion, and I don't want to put troops along the border since that might provoke him, and if he invades everyone will blame me (and maybe they'll kill me?) so just need to be optimistic- ignore the warnings, lock up the traitors who keep trying to provoke us to fight Hitler, put fingers in ears etc. 7) F*ck, he invaded. 8) Quietly have nervous breakdown, go into your room and sulk, and wait to see if your people turn on you and have you shot for this giant cock-up (hey, you'd do it) 9) Your people show up and...they say that only you can lead them? Whoo- bullet dodged! Okay, war time- alright, let's show Hitler what Stalins' Russia is made of! (also, shoot anyone who looks at you funny). 10) It's 1945- Hitler is dead, I own half of Europe...just as planned (smoke). Now, back to purging!

[@AlexanderUnit-731]

It is amazing how american kids people believe in Hebbels/US anti-soviet propaganda still thinking that it is not propaganda.

[@autolykos9822]

Exactly. It was pretty clear (and even well-known at the time) that Hitler and Stalin both planned to backstab each other. They only worked together before that because they had to - nobody else would supply Germany with resources or the Soviets with technology. The Soviets were indeed surprised by Operation Barbarossa - but only because they hoped to strike first, and deployed in an offensive position (for example, many airfields were only miles from the front, which caused them to lose a significant part of their air force while it was still on the ground).

[@AlexanderUnit-731]

Autolykos LOL. The stupid idea that USSR wanted to attack first (for what reason?) was voiced by Hitler to justify his war in the eyes of united Nazi Europe. Even when they advanced deeply in USSR's territory, Nazi propaganda told people that it was USSR who attacked first. Shame that Goebel's propaganda tales were not criticaly adopted by Americans during Cold war and still those barbaric theories are reproducting in the minds of kids in the 21st century.

[@njb1126]

What if Stalin was born in the US state of Georgia?

[@emanuelneagu14]

A handful of people would've known him as a very peaceful and normal human being because he wouldn't have been attributed words like "dictator" along with all the dramas resulted from logical decisions of a comitee but even more grey shaded. Meanwhile, nazis took over the world.

[@Estolcles]

@6:35 When he said: "A cult of personality no different than Mussolini or", I can't be the only one who's brain mentally heard the music playing, and thought: "Kennedyyyyyyyyyyyyy..."?

[@rowdyrico]

That one picture you used to represent Trotsky was actually Mikhail Kalinin.

[@Raguleader]

Huh. They look like they could be brothers. Must be the haircuts.

[@ethpling165]

Juan Esteban No pfp no opinion

[@svein6555]

They look so much alike

[@FrantiC119]

They have the same hair, glasses, and facial hair, but their faces look completely different. Kalinin's face is much broader more, square, and his eyes much less round. It's really annoying because I think I've seen a KZbinr ue a picture of him for Trotsky before. I don't know how you make this mistake unless you're going through the histories of old Bolsheviks and see his picture without reading the caption or something. Either way it really makes you look like you don't know what you're talking about.

[@hypernova4725]

@@juanesteban5958 seriously wtf

[@crackedemerald4930]

why can't Joseph fly a plane? because he is always... Stalin

[@allegiant804-floridaaviati5]

Get out.

[@HackCentury]

Delete your channel

[@guaymaster]

something something Hermit Purple

[@Marylandbrony]

It's funny because Stalin was actually afraid of flying.

[@ocbee6175]

Pedro Rocha Lol

[@DarAl-Alqitat]

What I see: USSR What my Grandpa sees:DAMN COMMIES

[@kaparg]

and he's very goddamn correct

[@SMarie-zk9oj]

@@kaparg says the one with the swatsika on his pic

[@papastalin3508]

Haha, "never came to power" that's a cute concept

[@bruhlel6674]

Grandpa stalin send him to gulag😡🤬🤬🤬

[@MisterSpinalzo]

Literally 5'4''

[@RE-zl7sy]

@@MisterSpinalzo taller then u

[@bigpp3189]

Yu short lol

[@SilusValeriusVT]

An even funnier joke is that every time he pulls up that picture of you and me, he doesn't know that the third person is kalinin

[@josephstalin7248]

What comrade im the best thing to happen to this world

[@God-sz5rf]

Nah

[@kylek7979]

Same

[@cdw2468]

Hey there, you handsome comrade

[@AlternateHistoryHub]

ok stalin

[@kenknudson3643]

If I say no do I go to gulag?

[@simonpierrelauzon3845]

I think you should have gone further in your alternate timeline. For instance, in Germany, there was a socialist revolutionary party that was fighting against the fascists. Perhaps we could have imagined that with Troskyist support, maybe Hitler doesn't happen. Same with Spain: so instead of having a singular USSR that fights everyone, perhaps other countries attain revolutions, and are natural allies to the USSR in that timeline.

[@Archon3960]

Maybe he didn't wanted to go so far as to analyse the situation country-by-country. Who knows ?

[@neinman2222]

@CanBiteIt CanLikeIt Why? Its pretty reasonable to assume that the communists would have won in Spain if they had real support from the Soviets. And with Trotsky funding Thälmann a civil war in Germany doesn't sound unrealistic either.

[@billybobjoe7524]

Don’t forget the French communists

[@redshirt5126]

problem was, communism was not very popular in Europe. Communist groups in Germany actually drove a lot of people to the Nazis because of their attacks on non-communist. Unless the alternet timeline causes the german communist groups to turn the violence down a notch I don't see how the Nazis could have been stopped.

[@comradewildcat1770]

@@plazmatic954 No, Germany was quite weak in the beginning of the war. A pre-emptive invasion of Germany in the mid-1930s by the Soviet Union would almost definitely lead to a communist victory.

[@CC-hx8gj]

10:38 why did this make me laugh so hard

[@oliversherman2414]

I love your channel keep up the great stuff

[@HeyItsJustMax]

What do you call a Soviet sniper? A Marxman Edit: *Insert cringy thanks for likes*

[@utahraptor4729874]

Zaitsev

[@essexclass8168]

what do you call a dead Soviet sniper? Finnished

[@TheJadeFist]

ok you can take a like. Also they had to take extra care to aim, before they ran out of the bullets they weren't given.

[@harlleygurrola8394]

M Hanchuk 🤣🤣😆😆

[@jrivers5164]

Very creative and clever

[@karriesoo]

Stalin didn't completely trust Hitler. He just thought that the USSR was not ready for war. He was just buying time. Or at least trying to.

[@Xenonfastfall]

Karen McCullough but the only guy surprised by the invasion was stalin, bloody idiot

[@karriesoo]

Part of that was his hysteria and refusal to believe that the war had started

[@vallergergo737]

I have this interesting sentence from a book, from some english author. As it said: The russian forces were in complete suprise in their undefendable positions on the border. Now, if you have like 3 million men on the border, who are NOT preparing for defence, what could it mean? Well, the only other tactic is attack, so it's not hard to figure out. Both Stalin and Hitler wanted to invade each other, Hitler just did it faster.

[@Smutnovsor]

+Xenonfasthall he defiantly wasn't. Read 18th meeting of communist party text (1939) where Stalin clearly accuses western countries (especially Britain) of making aggressor stronger and stronger by feeding him all that he demands.

[@Xenonfastfall]

Smutnovsor no at the time, he was surprise they would attack before england surrendered. And well everyone knew but they didnt want to get accused for treason

[@aqueen1014]

UGA’ Sanford Stadium shoutout was unexpected but highly appreciated

[@hatinmyselfiscool2879]

Kalinin: Stalin why does everyone think i’m Trotsky. Stalin: *take’s icepick*

[@Gooberpatrol66]

5:08 That's not a picture of Trotsky. That's Mikhail Kalinin.

[@GunGreenGo]

lol, yes it isn't Trotsky indeed. Still it is a great vid!

[@TheZINGularity]

I was sure that wasnt him, thanks for verifying xd

[@kevinwhite7674]

Lev Bronstein, not Vladimir Lenin, he was of Jewish stock.

[@jackemanman]

ones race/ethnicity have nothing to do with this

[@legit_potato2451]

Nathan Dehnel ii

[@jamsch5692]

Boost party popularity

[@WTC1973]

I'd take it you'd enjoy it if you rose to power instead of Stalin, right?

[@josephstalin9196]

Leon Trotsky we meet again at last.

[@WTC1973]

Oh no... things are about to go bad...

[@Onneukbaar]

Leon Trotsky fuck you

[@kjell744]

HOI3?

[@josephstalin425]

What the fu-

[@josephstalin133]

ck

[@petartoshkov2076]

Stalin: *Fucks up his nation* The internet: Carefully he's a hero

[@thewingedone1172]

Stalin was the most succesful ruler in the history of Russia

[@channeldmitry8460]

Stalin was the best leader of Russian history, the reason people in Russia got school and being smart and became global superpower under 50 years is because of him.

[@ortherner]

Everyone in the replies are brianwashed by Soviet Propaganda.

[@channeldmitry8460]

@@ortherner define propaganda

[@nxibba]

@@channeldmitry8460 smart? Im gonna stop you right there lol

[@Bored4280]

4:18 Actually it's not Trotsky with Lenin, it's Mikhail Kalinin

[@traiancoza5214]

Oh shit you're right wtf

[@philipshearer5286]

Акакий Криворуков it's Trotsky

[@timoraftsjo6485]

no its Kalinin

[@cobalt2361]

How can you tell? Those two look the same lol

[@traiancoza5214]

Kalinin looks like an old fart w/ glasses whereas Trotsky looks like pure evil.

[@CTMovies]

Video should be called What If Stallins father never came

[@bitchlasagna1777]

yah

[@official_commanderhale965]

What if Stalin's mother swallowed?

[@assad7313]

In what way. ;)

[@vedantthapar3666]

What if he pulled out in time?

[@maxdembroski7956]

Or “What if Stalin’s mom swallowed?”

[@emperorconstantinexipalaio4121]

I sometimes disagree with you and nitpick a lot but you still make great videos! Keep it up bud!

[@johnniebee4328]

LOL portrait of the Tsar with "heh whoops" that was awesome

[@yamashiro1442]

What if the Spanish American war never happened?

[@UltrasmashGP]

My fellow Puerto Rican!!!!! Boricua!!!!!

[@solid7468]

You would be a Spaniard

[@seyersusej8329]

Love your profile pic :D

[@julianmelillo]

Akagi 144 No America for you

[@darken2417]

Cuba wouldn't be a communist wasteland. The Philippines wouldn't be a land torn by organized crime and deep seeded corruption. Spain would have been able to continue to bounce back from a time of decline instead of being stamped down for good. Puerto Rico(the lucky one of the three islands) granted may not be as nice as it is now unless if Spain after bouncing back, came back relatively strong. (Certainly possible) Either way Cuba and the Philippines would be far more developed and stable than in this timeline. Spain wouldn't have fell to liberals after the huge decline that followed the war. The Second Spanish Republic wouldn't have formed from this. The Spanish Civil War wouldn't have happened. The communist radicals that were in charge of that republic wouldn't have massacred priests, destroyed churches, and killed altar boys/girls or desecrated the bodies of buried nuns. Though with a Spain given time to bounce back and without a Civil War may join in on WWI. (Though they would have no real reason to enter the war.)

[@isakkelleryerameyn8400]

Hey guys! The bearded man with glasses in 4:18 is actually not Leon Trotsky, but Mikhail Kalinin (after whom Kaliningrad, former german Königsberg is named), who was the Head of State of the USSR until he died in 1946 of cancer. Commonly mistaken as Trotsky, he fails to be as recognized as other big members of the original Central Comitee. He always backed Stalin.

[@Hirohito_iLoveYou]

@Jessica seems legit

[@manysuchcases12]

are you here from the FinBol video lmao

[@hikarushidou-ys3yy]

We don't have to guess what Trotsky would do, we can see what he did, and he brutally suppressed Kronstadt, he brutally suppressed democracy by force of arms... Soviet Union would still be a brutal dictatorship.

[@TankMarko]

You keep showing the picture of Kalinin😂😂

[@chas5520]

1) Trotsky was a materialist, not an idealist 2) The picture of Stalin, Lenin and "Trotsky" is wrongly described as the Bolshevik on the right is Mikhail Kalinin

[@revelvotolols7746]

Materialism is a ideology...

[@SoaringSuccubus]

I don't think he's speaking of the philosophical idealism/materialism dichotomy here...

[@revelvotolols7746]

@Kobagrad No, it is not. Marxism is a psuedo-social science . Social science itself which also includes is economics are one of the weakest branches of sciences . Materialism is not science it's belief or a rationalization not a observation . For example lets take anger(a emotion) what materialism does is rationalize that into thinking it's merely matter movement in your brain .

[@abrvalg321]

2:46 those are not the only names you really need to remember. Nikolai Bukharin, Geogiry Plekhanov, Grigory Zinoviev, Yakov Sverdlov, Sergei Kirov, Mikhail Frunze are actually important in that story.

[@AlternateHistoryHub]

Константин Войнов Yeah I know but I couldn't include them without it being 30 minutes

[@suddenlytitan739]

what if Mao Zedong never came to power? he killed more

[@SuperKittenator]

What if Collectivism never became popular, it is by far the deadliest idea at least in the 20th and 21st centuries and arguably the modern era

[@AlexanderUnit-731]

What if free market really existed in human history?

[@abrvalg321]

Dr. Gazooks have you ever heard about division of labor? Sure, you can be super individualist and produce everything on your own.

[@paula1668]

One thing I don't get: why did stalin trust nobody, but when he met hitler he was like 'hey what a nice guy let's become allies'?

[@joseochoa4200]

Nice video

[@connorlafo5310]

Weird... Mussolini's mom also wanted a priest.

[@techpriest6962]

BMAN488877 Lol

[@EmmaR]

What if WE are living in an alternate timeline and Stalin is the alternate option? What if TROTSKY was actually the main timeline.

[@MrJ-rw2hb]

Emma R. *takes a hit* woah

[@tejaslotay5959]

That was my first thought too

[@BlueBird-wb6kb]

Emma R. This Timeline has Bioshock 1/2 just stay here

[@niceboi4592]

that's not what alternate means

[@anonanon5608]

Emma R. in philosophy, there's a theory that everything exists, but every alternate universe and stuff, so in theory, that could be true, but I'm happy here, I love Stalin bc I'm a psychopath, so I'm glad I live in this world

[@EveryonesFavoriteEnby]

Other people with a time machine: Kill Hitler Me: brings modern hospital to Lenin to help him survive the stroke.

[@TheEventHorizon909]

So basically.... *The plot of Red Alert 1 minus the time travel*

[@looinrims]

TheEventHorizon no, there is no Soviet Union by the 30s, they would be burned to the fucking ground in their backwater nation

[@KeyManDan]

About Hitler. You forget communists and socialists were toe to toe with Nazis is Germany. With Trotsky exporting money and arms to Europe's commies, it may have meant all the difference in Germany, where communists were numerous.

[@dirkklumper2037]

Don't forget that the Nazis were supported by the big industrialists and other capitalists. They would lose everything if the communists would be in power and would match any support the communists received. I doubt that Trotsky's support would've made a big difference in Germany.

[@KeyManDan]

If anything it would have led to an all out civil war.

[@dirkklumper2037]

Doubt that, who would want to go back to the post-war november revolution? Besides, when the communists an social democrats were outlawed in 1933 they had 14.32% and 21.58% of the votes respectively. They were pretty big, but there was no uprising.

[@KeyManDan]

Now imagine with Trotsky funding they'd engage in same scare tactics Nazis used. Youth brigades, armed worker strikes. Nazis were in direct opposition to soviets becasue they fought for the same down to earth miserable poor workers, but nazis acted on their premises with pogroms and pushed all blame on minorities, imagine commies do the same but push the blame on capitalists and give arms to poor workers. There would be open brawls and shootouts on streets.

[@dirkklumper2037]

that's pretty much what happened during the november revolution. I see no reason how the outcome would be different. Armed revolt; proclamation of socialist/spartacist republics; countered by armed forces, SA and other reactionaries; lot of dead and arrested communists.

[@cisco3111]

What if George Washington became King of America?

[@MRJgaming9]

Cisco Blue Many presidents were related to Washington.

[@Jobe-13]

Cisco Blue And abolished slavery and called for white settlers, natives, and free Africans to integrate completely together? How would all of that change America's history? The United States Of The American Democratic Kingdom. (USADK). They would be pretty cool actually.

[@Jobe-13]

Cisco Blue In my opinion, The USADK would be a constitutional monarchy with a economy/political system somewhere between Capitalism and Socialism.

[@pyry1948]

Cisco Blue AC3 much?

[@khalilpontikes7293]

We would have dictators instead of presidents. Our country would also probably be even more militaristic and we could've possibly became an empire. That's my opinion.

[@KingCrafter999]

1:04 love how you use a 750ish year map

[@thezombiecreeper]

The video is more like: How to Creatively Commit Suicide in the Soviet Union in the 1930’s

[@cojimotomisashi879]

I love the animations!

[@Jobe-13]

Cojimoto Misashi Same

[@soupycask]

Cojimoto Misashi same

[@mrnonsense1031]

especially the facial expressions.

[@maksymcazymir1727]

"No, I take that back!" throws Cody into pit blindfolded. Lol.

[@seankinsellasean]

What if Haramble never got murdered?

[@tristanjiskoot5792]

There would be global peace

[@demnachos9576]

dead meme

[@byniavo6505]

it's a meme you dip

[@kellywilson-lawson1857]

Nothing would change

[@memoofjacoboarbenzjuanarev9724]

No Dicks Out.

[@libertarianwhohatesdemsand5741]

So stalin born in georgia which is russian but not really. Napolean is born in corsica which is france but not really. And finally hitler is born in austria which is german but not really. Pattern?????????????

[@l0ther128]

Coincidence? I think not!

[@giacomopiccinini9157]

Ah, the ultimate ‘what if’ of last century’s history

[@novachrono1341]

Maybe you could do "what if Lenin was still in power" or "what if Lenin never died"

[@kekero540]

Jotaro Kujo man he is just a brain in some formaldehyde. Going insane

[@danielsan901998]

Inmortal Lenin conquer the world with his hands

[@trapped5074]

Uninspiring, Sickly? You know me so well :)

[@TheoneandonlyDrops]

you forgot small and stupid :3

[@sonya7025]

Stalin you are my hero!

[@ijsmikasa703]

Joseph Stalin Yes, Only Capitalist America thought that you're evil but you're hero of all of us.

[@sobitasadullah4517]

Comrade Stalin! I'm your biggest fan! ☭ Glory to the proletariat!

[@ijsmikasa703]

Send Ze Creator to Gulag!!!

[@tl256]

I'd like to experience this alternate reality in the 21st century just so I could look at the alternative videos history of 'what if the soviet union never invaded Germany?' and find the most accurate one depicting WW2

[@psychotripnerdstuff]

Dear God it sounded like such a better timeline at first, but then it just kept going downhill.

[@Katyusha666]

The idea that Stalin did not recognize Nazi Germany as a threat is a canard born of the Khrushchev era, the fact is that he expected war with Germany but thought Hitler would learn from Napoleon and not engage in a war of two fronts. It was only after the invasion that the Soviets started considering talks with the British, before that, they expected a cease-fire between Germany and Britain before any German invasion.

[@MrMarinus18]

On paper Napoleon actually had a better chance as the Russian army was not much larger than the French army. In sharp contrast the Soviet red army was more than 3 times the size of the German army. Stalin believed Hitler would not attack an army head on 3 times the size of his own.

[@ChaplainDMK]

The Red Army was smaller than the Wehrmacht, even withouth all the other Axis powers that attacked along with them. Plus 1 million Red Army troops were stationed on the Manchurian border. The Red Army was outnumbered by the Axis armies until late 1942. But the Soviets had a huge manpool of reservists to quickly conscript.

[@MrMarinus18]

Those other nations only sent very small armies. They had very little interest in fighting in Russia and only sent what they felt like they needed to to keep Germany happy. The Soviets did not keep so many troops on the Manchurian border as Stalin knew Japan was not really that much of a threat. While it had indeed attacked them the attack was deflected rather easily and Japan didn't have a very large army being primairily a naval power. There was a large army but of around 60.000. However Stalin was having a huge army stationed against Germany. He thought of it as showboating which was common to force your opponent into a negotiating position.

[@ChaplainDMK]

marinus18 Bullshit, 700.000 men were sent by the German allies (excluding Finland) in 1942, 1 million Red Army troops were stationed in the Far East District against Japan, and those were never moved west, in fact the number of troops in the Far East increased through the war, and the Red Army was outnumbered for basically the first year on the Eastern Front by a significant number.

[@brucemercer7753]

Why should Stalin think Nazis were a threat? Both Socialists in a time when that was RARE. And both ideologies spring up from the same branch politically. The Nazi's were he closest thing in the world to the Soviets that had power invested within a national government AND both sides hated the same Slavic minorities of Eastern Europe. They were NATURAL ALLIES at the time. Sure each side hated each other too, Fascist and Nazis couldn't exist inside the same border because both sides do not tolerate opposition. But they had so much other hatred in common and so many similar ideas in how to run a nation (murder, mass arrest, subjugation). So... following something mentioned about Stalin in the video... Stalin was thinking more about protectionism to maintain Russia/himself... not expanding through Wars of Conquest. And Germany was clearly amping up for War.. why not strike a treaty with the other EVIL power of the continent in hopes that they fight the Bourgeois and massively weaken each other. Plus it should give the Soviets more time to build their own military.

[@zacharyfrancis627]

What if the US joined the Axis during WW2

[@NoImmigrantsinEurope]

The world would be a much better place.

[@Art_From_Tezikovka]

wtf is wrong with you

[@Hellhound23691]

Civil war in the U.S

[@BuckingBadger]

The American People wouldn't be happy at all

[@94noj]

what do you mean by that? please tell me you are joking

[@kenis555derp6]

Lenin: Koff Stalin: Lemmie just yoink this power. AltHistory: How about No

[@SammiScoop_1]

God, if you ever wanted to make a time travel movie this would be the point to do it.

[@davegamingonyt4619]

Trotsky is still better than Jake and Logan Paul

[@looinrims]

Dave Gamingonyt no

[@sciencefictionisreal1608]

here here

[@lpflore]

Everything is better than those two

[@etrs]

*WHEEZE*

[@lpflore]

@@chintyaeoudia3377 I said every*thing* and not everyone

[@andrewmoore7014]

The thing is, in the 20's and 30's a lot of the world's people were very amenable to revolutionary ideas. It's quite possible that by the 40's much of Europe would already BE socialist even without a Soviet invasion. Germany came very close but the fascists won out. That changes the "alternate WW2" scenario a great deal.

[@alexkhan1383]

Agreed. With Trotsky in power, i think it would be safe to assume the communists in Germany gain control. What i would love to see is how that timeline turns out.

[@Verpal]

Hard to tell, after all, with increased communist threat in the west, France/Britain/America might be aiding Weimar/Nazi/Kaiser to fight Communist.

[@barkingnoise]

There are a few additional factors in German politics of the time that relates to the outside powers. For one, Stalin declared Social Democracy a twin-cousin of fascism. This led to a staunch boycott of the SPD by the stalinist communists (who together far exceeded in popular support compared with the nazis in the elections), and probably it was returned since social democrats in the elections marketed themselves as against the respective percieved front figures of the monarchy, the nazis and the communists ("Gegen (=Against): Papen, Hitler, Thälmann", from an election poster) - all of which prevented a united front against fascism between the communists and the social democrats who were both getting flak from the fascists, regularly. Compounding this was the SPD leaders response to fascist attacks on social democratic gatherings and meetings was to disarm (yes they were armed, strike guards and the like) and "put faith in the law" and let the police handle them. That leap of faith didn't work. Not to say that Trotsky would have necessarily been better at this (because of tendencies of factionalism, perceived or true, which was one of the motivations listed for his booting) but he would not cement the divide by equating them with fascists. Of course, anything resembling a united front of socialists would have been met with increased foreign funding of the nazis - but they would probably lose the election at least.

[@FirstnameLastname-do1px]

Andrew Moore The nazi's were socialist.

[@barkingnoise]

Caleb Moore No they weren't, try reading history again.

[@crusifidy1291]

Trotsky: doesnt lurge the people Finland:*chucles* Im in danger

[@Shammm23]

Fun Fact Leon Tropski isn’t his real name Real Name Was Lev Davidovich Bronstein He Changed it after he returned from exile

[@conductingintomfoolery9163]

"stein"

[@ablorenz]

@@conductingintomfoolery9163 He was a Jew.

[@barrybend7189]

This timeline: I'M GOING TO THE ONE PLACE NOT CORRUPTED BY CAPITALISM!.... SPACE!

[@wyantunruh7541]

Barry Bend damnit premier, get back here!!!

[@BigLadsProductions]

Conscript reporting...

[@refoliation]

Careful they just set up a USA embassy in space and the CIA is training those aliens from Mars Attacks to overthrow you / make you go back to work at Panera.

[@BobBob-of7fg]

just u wait

[@samuelejamesmaestri9713]

Barry Bend Elon Musk has joined the game

[@BelleDividends]

If Staling never existed/never came to power: 1) Zinoviev would have taken power. A bureaucratic caste was developing in Soviet Russia, a caste that would never have wanted a pro-working class guy like Trotsky. Zinoviev would be the most likely candidate to take the power. Stalin did not come into power solely of his own skills, but also because he was the most suitable candidate for the bureaucracy at the time. Zinoviev would have ruled like the USSR was ruled after Stalin: brutal when surprising uprisings, but no 'excessive' killings like Stalin had done. 2) With Trotsky in power: Hitler would have a more difficult time of coming into power. KPD would have attempted the 1923 revolution instead of preparing and propagating it and than bailing out at the very last moment. In 1932-1933, the KPD would make the NSDAP its primary enemy, not the SPD like Stalin did. 3) Some revolutions are far more likely to have succeeded or some great strike movements would have been far more likely: 1926 UK, 1925-1927 China, 1936 France-Belgium, Spain 1936-1939. Trotsky was a master at leading revolutions (he did in 1905 and in 1917), while Stalin was not and often tried to derail revolution, fearing a western communist revolution would lead to the bureaucracy in the USSR being challenged by the Soviet working class. 4) Trotsky would have industrialized differently. More focus on quality, less focus on quantity and rapid expansion. More focus on consumer goods, less focus on military. Trotsky saw the economic, productivity and efficiency headstart of the Western countries as the biggest threat. He feared a 1989-1991-like scenario while Stalin didn't. If the Western countries didn't execute a trade boycot with the Soviets and if Hitler would have been more friendly to the Soviet conquered populace, giving them entry to the German capitalist market, Trotsky's fear could have born out right there and than. This is not to say Trotsky wasn't aware of the military threat, he just saw the economic threat as the bigger threat. 5) Trotsky's army would likely be more efficient. He would not have executed the majority of his commanders in 1938 and the Soviet's military doctrine would have been kept intact. 6) You are correct that Trotsky would never have made a pact with Hitler. This would have made things a lot more difficult for Hitler, since he had to keep his eastern border fully undefended to invade France. The Soviets could have walked into Berlin without much resistance during the French campaign, an opportunity Trotsky would not fail to take. Possibly Hitler would not have dared to invade Poland, posing a big problem since Hitler was massively deficit-spending and would have gone bankrupt in a few years if he couldn't plunder other economies by conquest. 7) Trotsky was less likely to invade military. He believed a revolution had to come from the people themselves, and wouldn't work if simply conquered. No Finnish winter war. However, Trotsky would have opted for military assistance and conquest in support of an ongoing revolution. Just as you indicated, it would also have been possible that he would invade nazi Germany, since this regime posed a huge threat to communism and to the world wide working class in general.

[@doncarlin9081]

I think your assessment is more accurate (which is my way of saying it agrees with mine lol). Trotsky was brutal but not nearly brutal as Stalin, there would have been less purges especially of military officers because Trotsky knew how vital experienced professional military officers are to an armed forces. While I don't think the USSR would have had the industrial capacity it had under Stalin by the end of WW2, the USSR could have made up for that by fewer people being killed, particularly experienced officers. Also Trotsky was born into a land-owning family that was also farming, he probably would have handled Soviet agricultural production differently and more effectively than Stalin did, and probably wouldn't have been dead set to eliminate the Kulaks as a class.

[@joeyhamilton6854]

I don’t know if you play HOI4 but this could be a great mod for the game. Basically a nazi Germany that doesn’t invade Poland or France and a less militaristic (also less purged) Soviet Union. Countries fighting soviet backed rebels not a global war. I would love to see is the allies would work with hitler to stop the soviets as troskie was not a fan of imperialism.

[@frindjinny6]

You sound like you’re talking about the Mensheviks

[@frindjinny6]

Lennon wanted Trotsky into power, Stalin hid this paper so he can get into the role of power

[@donbarzinitut]

@@frindjinny6 Indeed. www.wsws.org/en/articles/2009/02/rev1-f25.html

[@e-cuauhtemoc]

Dude! That group photo of Stalin, Lenin and "Trotsky" isn't actually Trotsky!! That's Kalinin!!

[@theunionjack5172]

There’s one country forgotten in this. I have a feeling that in this realities ww2/3 the allies would’ve recruited one more ally. Japan. They would’ve been crucial as the soviets would have to sends swabs of there army to deal with them

[@fmilan1]

I imagine an alternate world in which the Vikings had been successful and had settled in the northeastern US, this would have the chance to pre-Columbian peoples expose themselves gradually to the rest of the world. Imagine if the Aztecs learned to sail with the Vikings and reached Europe, exposing themselves to all the changes of the world and learning from them, instead of being caught completely off guard? The isolation made them fragile.

[@wampower6848]

Fabio Milan interesting idea

[@JoseLeybaDiaz]

Imagine a world where the murderer of Wiston churchill would not rise to power.... people talk about hitler and stalin but never about the warmonger of churchill or roosevelt

[@Ninwildkat]

What???

[@GekidoTsuyoi]

I don't think the Aztecs would be going anywhere as they'd have been virtually wiped out just like in our timeline due to the many diseases Europeans carry.

[@fmilan1]

They would have been exposed to a smaller group of Europeans carrying them to the same diseases the Spanish did, but the difference would be that now they would have time to recover. In our timeline they did not had centuries to recover and adapt. If the contact had happened in the 10th or 11th century, they would have died by the hundred of thousands, but them the Vikings would not be able to bring a large group of Europeans and Africans to replace them, so there would be time for them to recover and be ready when the Spain arrives. Or they could have travel to the old world with the Vikings. Like the Vikings, the Aztecs had a pretty ruthless culture. Who knows? Maybe they would go the Viking way and end up being Christians the same way.In all cases, a gradual exposition to Europe could have been far more health to them.

[@Mateoski97]

What if Mao Zedong never rose to power?

[@user-cr3pn7rk2v]

China would be the best country in the world

[@cooldestroyer7195]

+Great Siam not really,zao lifted China out of its crap economy

[@user-cr3pn7rk2v]

Mr Creepy It would have lifted up by itself naturally. Mao postponed it by causing the great famine

[@sovietvictory4511]

fuck you bitch

[@IronPiedmont]

In that case, what we know as the Korean and Vietnam Wars would be very different.

[@tzeentchvonsheo9868]

Also, Trotsky didn't really spend the rest of his life in Mexica. Well, not right after being expelled from USSR, but later. At first, he spend some years in Turkey, then in France, and later in Norway, from where he finally got to Mexica in 1936 (He was expelled in 1929), so he only spent half of his post-USSR life in Mexica.

[@laurie1183]

He also spent time in the US as well.

[@emperorofthecosmos4640]

6:41 the timestamp of where the summary ends

[@datastorm75]

Small note: Japan would be allied against the USSR as well.

[@enclavesoldier769]

Yep, they were staunchly Anti-Communist

[@dragooons176]

Also without a German - Soviet pact being signed, Russia would remain a threat to Japan in the pacific, which in our timeline was signed causing Japan (a German ally) to not be threatened by Russia and which lead to Japan not fighting the Russians after Germany broke the pact, which would've caused without question a Japanese invasion into eastern Russia even if the allies never fought Russia in this alternate timeline. This also means Japan would be unable to focus and capitalize on an attack at pearl harbor and the pacific, meaning Japan and the U.S would not be going to war, especially after seeing the U.S military production go into full gear. Events after this alternative and much shorter world war two are up in the air though.

[@Schmeethe88]

The German Banana My theory- as Germany is beginning their expansion with Austria and Czechoslovakia, the Soviet Union would already be advancing their own borders. Retaking Bessarabia, possibly the winter war with Finland, and perhaps even invading Iraq/Iran for access to their oil and a port in the Indian Ocean. This would pull more and more focus away from the actions of Germany, and draw the limelight to the Soviet Union- and they may have been the first to declare war and invade Poland. I could actually see the Poles allying with Germany and fighting together against the Soviet Union with material aid and volunteers from the Allies. At any rate, things would have been MUCH different.

[@brandon.bymaster3014]

Sinanal Fascismo yes but you have to think that if Stalin didn't come to power Trotsky wouldn't kill his top commanders and generals and his soldiers, so the red army would way more effective.

[@Zeruel3]

There's also china to consider, if Trotsky is more aggressive in support of communist movements outside the USSR, odds are the Chinese communists are going to be getting some extra help, possibly setting up a people's republic during the warlords era. On top of that if Japan still wants the resources of China to find its industry you might see a three way war for control of China involving the Kuomintang/Nationalists, Communists and Imperial Japan/Manchuria and other Chinese puppet governments alongside the land war with the Soviet Union

[@lechevalier-ns2pt]

i have a few suggestions for future episodes 1 what if the arab conquest failed 2 what if charlemagne's sons never divided his empire 3 what if the french won the seven years war 4 what if america/canada won the war of 1812 5 what if the mongols won the battle of Ain jalut 6 what if the ottoman empire never fell 7 what if germany won the first world war

[@dumbestcolt6928]

lechevalier6661 well, nobody won the war of 1812, you guys burned it down AFTER Canada made a truce, it just took a while for the message to get out, no one won the war, it was a draw

[@bzonadskullcrusher8800]

Dumbest Colt50 Muh new orleans

[@lunarimperium42]

British soldiers and Royal marines burnt down the white house The Canadian's where busy repelling our invasion.

[@kingjonstarkgeryan8573]

lechevalier6661 You Cannucks were stuck in Canda fighting our JV team. our Varsity team was with Jackson destroying the Indians that the Brits paid to attack us and destroying the British army that destroyed Napoleon. By the way our ships were actually better than the Brits since our use of multiple woods in construction allowed our ships like the USS Constitution to fight on equal footing the British ships of the line.

[@TheLegend-mu6zg]

America didnt lose the war of 1812, no one lost, but no one won, it was like the Vietnam war

[@DudetaketheBus]

6:35 Nice Cult of Personality reference Cody...

[@LithiumThiefMusic]

My grandfather's granduncle was Trotsky, no joke.

[@javilorenzana]

What did he tell you about him?

[@SciencephiletheAI]

13:45 I'm pretty sure USSR was preparing for a war with the Nazis, but were taken by surprise with the Blitzkriegs

[@RahKibonnard]

4:18 CORR That's not Trotsky on the picture but Mikhail Kalinin, Chairman of the Russian Congress of Soviets and later Soviet Supreme. The city of Kaliningrad (ex-Königsberg) is still named after him... If you were wondering

[@frindjinny6]

Kaliningrad Ka-LIN-in-grad But Kongsberg was German in 1930s We might have some problems

[@mrvoodooman11]

Hey Alternatehistory, i have watch most your videos but your missing the one about Chernobyl and what would of happened if the 3 Hero's never made it to the valves to let out the water. I watch the Chernobyl series for my info it just came out few month ago.I would really love to know what the world would be like to day if Chernobyl really did go 100% side ways.

[@thecellhawk]

Now I can know how to back up the alternate history when I play Company of Heroes 2 as UK/US with GER vs USSR.

[@trevor5666]

The Saudi Arabia comment made me “oof”

[@sbevexlr848]

Wait why

[@essexclass8168]

Russia would lose due to having no Stalinium armor

[@bradleyfisher9814]

Essex Class trotskinium is much better

[@bradleyfisher9814]

Grisk Dreemur yes my son

[@bradleyfisher9814]

Grisk Dreemur apart from stalin :/

[@someidiot1399]

Leon Trotsky **Russian bias is not for you,German bias would win instead**

[@Leinja]

Where's my ice pick?

[@touristguy87]

"...he never should have ruled...but he did." Who said that hindsight was 20/20?

[@superkooper6594]

also Trotsky’s little mustache looks like the Mario Kart DS logo