Find out more about my "Everything You Need To Know About Bond Funds" online course here pensioncraft.com/register/investment-for-absolute-beginners/how-to-choose-a-bond-fund/
@thankyouthankyousomuch Жыл бұрын
Thanks for your training. Can you please feature your courses in UDEMY? Thanks
@edwardengulu80412 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@Pensioncraft2 жыл бұрын
Thanks @Edward Engulu!
@mshparber3 ай бұрын
Excellent explanation! Thank you!
@paulw58223 жыл бұрын
It's a good history lesson. I am not sure the yield curve is so easy to interpret now we have such low rates at the short end and the QE effects with buy backs along the curve. You only have to look at recent prints and expectations of inflation to see the yield curve is not responding the way it would have in the past?
@allfooballgoals2 жыл бұрын
thank you so much for such a wonderful class.
@Pensioncraft2 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@lwembawokiraggadenis7930 Жыл бұрын
Excellent video
@Pensioncraft Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much! @lwembawokiraggadenis7930
@w00dyalien3 жыл бұрын
Great class!
@Pensioncraft3 жыл бұрын
Glad you think so!
@whatisheartscont2be645 Жыл бұрын
Great explanation!
@bcmbcm25632 жыл бұрын
Very well explained, thanks!
@Pensioncraft2 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful @BCM BCM
@davidrangel56285 ай бұрын
excelent video
@Pensioncraft5 ай бұрын
So pleased you enjoyed it @davidrangel5628
@manutwitter12482 жыл бұрын
Great explanation. People are too uneducated in economics. We need people and teachers like you.
@Pensioncraft2 жыл бұрын
Happy to help
@SurfCityBill3 жыл бұрын
That's the most understandable explanation with the best illustrative graphics I've seen on this subject.
@Pensioncraft3 жыл бұрын
Glad you think so!
@Diana-CameliaBURUIAN Жыл бұрын
Thank you a lot for the explanation! Although, I am not quite sure I understood it comletely. Could you please tell me why at the moment 7:45 you said ”when recession hit, the curve went from flat to upward sloping” becuase I did not see the yield curve being upward sloping or I might not be looking correctly at the graph. Thank you again for the great videos! I have just discovered your channel and I think it is very useful
@brianhoran33973 жыл бұрын
Mike Green often pulls up a 5 year labour participation rate growth and it maps the yield even more accurately than the 5y median GDP Growth.
@danielbrown56213 жыл бұрын
Can we really claim that the bond market is showing us anything about future growth expectations while we have QE distortion of bond prices?
@aks7777773 жыл бұрын
Ramin, I was waiting for summary slide on how this can be played during crisis and non crisis time.
@gerry23453 жыл бұрын
I like this vid. Good insight.
@Pensioncraft3 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@shahidaslan3 жыл бұрын
Hey a big fan your content sir, also a programmer myself been wondering how do you make your visualizations? which tools they look very clean. Thank you
@Pensioncraft3 жыл бұрын
Hi @arsian shahid, I use ggplot2 package in R for my plots and RStudio to edit and run R code and I talk about how I produce some of my graphs in this video kzbin.info/www/bejne/enioYqB9jr6mfqc
@Ali3hamodi3 жыл бұрын
Regarding the US Treasury Yield so is it always the Fed control both values (for 1 year and 30 year) and increase/decrease the value of both at the same time? Thanks for the video
@sujalshah45 Жыл бұрын
Want to know about Shifts and Twist in the yield curve Eg parallel shift , twist and Hump
@letgotothemoon81742 жыл бұрын
So it is good time now to buy TLT ?
@haroldbetterson18773 жыл бұрын
Are you gona do a vid on the impact of the new covid strain? (To be watched at 2x speed of course hehe)
@alisonwang34462 жыл бұрын
wonderful
@Pensioncraft2 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Cheers!
@JohnMcLaughlinPlus3 жыл бұрын
outstanding video....
@Pensioncraft3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much 😀
@gibbbo3 жыл бұрын
Can someone tell me why the long term yield tracks nominal GDP growth expectation rather than real GDP growth expectation?
@whispernovember2 жыл бұрын
Because yields are nominal also.
@jouleSansLoi3 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@Pensioncraft3 жыл бұрын
You're welcome
@johnmerlino70113 жыл бұрын
It's mentioned that the Short end of the curve is determined /controlled by the Fed, but in the future, could the Fed control the long end of the yield curve in order to flatten the curve? If they provide a new revenue stream to commercial banks (IOR) to get them to be the new buyers of 10 year bonds, might the Fed be able to allow Inflation to run high, without the risks of the long end yields going out of control. Isn't the 10 year bond yield driven by 'bond purchase demand'? If the Fed starts tapering, maybe they get the commercial banks to start buying the bonds they stop buying but on the long end to enable keeping a narrow curve. Thoughts?
@apothe63 жыл бұрын
Great educational video ramin
@Pensioncraft3 жыл бұрын
Thank you I am glad you found it helpful
@lapserdak243 жыл бұрын
which is the egg and which is the chicken? yields are defined by growth or growth is defined by willing to lend to government?
@whispernovember2 жыл бұрын
It's very possible to borrow funds for unproductive purposes. Growth is first.
@web2yt4883 жыл бұрын
Great
@Pensioncraft3 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@musheopeaus41253 жыл бұрын
So it's not a good return compared th equities
@CaseyBurnsInvesting3 жыл бұрын
The yield curve does whatever the Fed wants it to do these days.
@robweinberg93963 жыл бұрын
not true
@Lpmeff5 ай бұрын
They play with it but never are they in charge long term
@philipwells27933 жыл бұрын
I still cannot see how bonds currently can provide a hedge against equity with current yields being so low. I can see how flight from shares may lead to a temporary demand driven increase in bond market prices, but that will not necessarily happen with ultra low interest rates. If interest rates were currently higher yes I would agree, bonds are a hedge as the yield could be dropped so that the market price increases. A substantial risk in the stock markets at present is the prospect of increased interest rates causing a sell off, well if the interest rates increase the bond prices will fall and so will the market. No hedge there.
@owasco78983 жыл бұрын
I agree with you. If I thought the market was taking a dive, I would flee to cash. I know it pays nothing but that is about what bonds pay at the moment.
@hamlet74822 жыл бұрын
@@RogerYeahmon the price of bonds went down, but the yields went up.
@centurione64893 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@Pensioncraft3 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
3 жыл бұрын
To me, long-term bonds currently are a great ('yet' volatile) addition to the portfolio as an equity diversifier - the volatility (of a high quality asset) itself already has its own value - and more so, of course with it's ability to work as a hedge. Great tool overall, helpful part of my portfolio. Thank you so much for teaching me/us. 👍
@thesolitaryadventurer3 жыл бұрын
That's hedging with an asset class that enforces a real loss (nominal seems overrecorded and inflation seems underrecorded). Why is that net beneficial?
3 жыл бұрын
@@thesolitaryadventurer I won't get into much detail here, but let's just say i am willing to pay an insurance premium and losses don't always hurt as much as they seem to on paper.
@george69772 жыл бұрын
👍
@T3AMKILL3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video! Could you please expand a bit on how you derived/calculated the GDP expectations using 30 year bonds and vice versa? Also if trying to look at the past (what rates were vs. what gdp was) I assume you can use the Taylor rule. Thanks
@george69772 жыл бұрын
With US inflation at 7% why do investors buy US Treasury bonds yielding a 2% nominal return? They are lending money for a guaranteed real return of -5%, that’s a real loss of 5%.
@whispernovember2 жыл бұрын
Money supply can contract in the future. That changes the nominal to real conversion. Plus look at the buyers, lots of central bank activity, US acts as a reserve worldwide. Central banks are buying treasuries to add legitimacy to their own currencies, which sometimes have lower nominal returns on their sources. So they sometimes even have a positive spread because their nominal cost of cap is a further negative. Look at Switzerland. And then you have just the very real math of -5% is better than -7%.