I like it. The cockpit displays are insanely nice. And the power. Oh the power. Wow.
@erikj.nuveenmddmd65578 ай бұрын
In my experience of 10 years with a Meridian, the single worst aspect of ownership was the costs of maintenance. I have a CJ2 now and it is 1/4 the annual costs to service.
@brandonadams78377 ай бұрын
What specifically costs so much more? Just more to inspect so more hours to pay out to maintenance?
@erikj.nuveenmddmd65577 ай бұрын
@@brandonadams7837 The biggest issue I found with the Meridian was the cost of services required. I was replacing a tremendous amount of parts and the service intervals on the plane under part 91 were extraordinarily costly. As compared to my CJ2, the costs were significantly higher with the Meridian. Average annual was $35,000 plus labor, plus parts as needed.
@brandonadams78377 ай бұрын
@@erikj.nuveenmddmd6557 what other aircraft did you consider? Epic? Vision Jet?
@erikj.nuveenmddmd65577 ай бұрын
No. I had transtioned to dual engine and once you do, it is hard to consider single engine options. In the dual turbofan category, I was thinking Honda Jet (very difficult maintenance issues, availability of parts and brake issues), Embraer Phenom 300 and CJ 2-4. I went with the CJ2 because it is a fantastic plane, mission is commonly 1,100 miles and parts are plentiful. Acquisition cost of 2.0-3.5m makes it a bargain.
@eglide732 ай бұрын
Nice, but not sure I’d trust the wing design/structure based on the Malibu/Meridian issues. I think I’d go with the TBM, which was designed as a turboprop from the beginning.
@erikj.nuveenmddmd65578 ай бұрын
There is no problem flying this plane in known ice. I have done it more than 100 times in mine. FIKI certified, boots on wings and tail. No issue at all.
@monocogenit17 ай бұрын
Beautiful plane!
@billquillin19528 ай бұрын
Long way from my Cherokee 140!!!!!
@larryegilman18 ай бұрын
Because the 140 is still affordable…remember when 2 mil would buy a citation?
@daszieher8 ай бұрын
at least you have that! that's already more than I got at this time 😃
@uberanalyst8 ай бұрын
Forget the $1M more expensive TBM, the Piper M700 doesn't compare well against an Epic E1000 at around the same price. The Epic is faster (333 knots), climbs faster (4000 fpm), and climbs higher (FL340) to get above weather with its 1200 shp PT6A. The Epic has a much larger cabin and useful load. The E1000 may still be the only certified plane that cruises at over 300 knots while burning less than 50 gph in cruise.
@tonusoodla48688 ай бұрын
Piper should implement the RED V12 Diesel engine into Malibu, this would be the ultimate value proposition!
@davescott94098 ай бұрын
What was the purpose of this video? It provided virtually no information. How about climb rates and cruise speeds/fuel burns at high, mid, and econo cruise speeds and useful load.
@davideckberg-p7l4 ай бұрын
Well stated. The people who show airplanes should know to geve performance fugures rather hust show pictures. People are not purchasing pictures.
@coreythomas91783 ай бұрын
@@davideckberg-p7l they actually are. It’s a big part of it. If people want to know those numbers they’ll research it themselves. You’re not in the market for one so you don’t need that info
@rodsilva808 ай бұрын
I would rather buy the EPIC E1000 GX
@flywithaopa8 ай бұрын
We will have an aircraft report for that airplane on our channel coming soon!
@Quick_Bisquick8 ай бұрын
Agreed. I have yet to see an airplane tick as many boxes as the Epic.
@hawkdsl4 ай бұрын
Piper got it right, and for a decent price. Your paying almost a million bucks for that 20 knots in the TBM.
@dezmo77 ай бұрын
Looks better than the TBM
@jamesbuckingham80738 ай бұрын
4 min video?
@ctn8308 ай бұрын
I heard useful load is much less than a TBM
@SMcda8 ай бұрын
it is but acquisition cost, cost to operate etc is far less
@angela1984a8 ай бұрын
@@SMcda Who owns Piper Aircraft?
@SMcda8 ай бұрын
@@angela1984a No idea. I have owned 3 PA-46. Fantastic GA plane
@JMGlider8 ай бұрын
Maybe it's just the way of cutting the video, but it looks like you were making the steepturns while only looking inside. That's not prohibited of course, but a bit strange to me to do that if it's not mandatory (like on an IFR checkride). Nice video though, cool plane. Greetings from Europe!
@seichiramos6 ай бұрын
Worst ‘review’ i’ve seen it. Wheres the information about take-off, cruise climb, climb rate, cruise…. Gallons per hour, TAS,
@conorb78728 ай бұрын
Cool plane and good review, but that title… oof. Spellcheck would help
@patrickdaniels26158 ай бұрын
I was looking forward to this review. High performance and we are shown slow flight….. terrible review. Sorry.
@flywithaopa8 ай бұрын
Hi Patrick, Thanks for watching! In order to capture the air to air footage you saw, we had to fly at a lower speed to stay in formation. We conduct our photo/video missions in a Bonanza which flies at the lower end of the Fury’s speed range, hence why you see the slower flight footage.
@patrickdaniels26158 ай бұрын
@@flywithaopa. Thanks for writing back.
@michaelmartin83318 ай бұрын
@@flywithaopa Thats fine but the real improvement, maybe the only one, is the new engine which results in a better climb rate and faster cruise speeds. It would have been nice to see what a real world rate of climb is, what the "normal" cruise TAS is and the fuel burn in cruise. Also, max speed of a TBM is 333 TAS I believe and normal cruise speed is 315-320. Just compare apples to apples not what the normal cruise speed of one plane vs the max speed of the other.
@tafaragadze64325 ай бұрын
So more power and higher fuel consumption in a plane with already little useful load and range...
@observer12427 ай бұрын
Who the heck can afford this airplane.
@2Phast4Rocket8 ай бұрын
Some rich guy will fly this airplane into know icing conditions
@timothywackerle23748 ай бұрын
I plan on being a little more careful than that.
@scottallen21908 ай бұрын
And into turbulence with the autopilot engaged, a recipe for an inflight breakup no doubt.
@jimpenney55088 ай бұрын
It is a FIKI airplane. So. That’s no problem.
@SMcda8 ай бұрын
it's designed to be flown in those conditions. Was your comment a question?
@JustSayN2O8 ай бұрын
no that never happens
@josephhann88444 ай бұрын
Why the stupid music. Just talk and report please.
@coreythomas91783 ай бұрын
@@josephhann8844 dont watch it
@Bupkus688 ай бұрын
Chinese owned - no thanks
@JustSayN2O8 ай бұрын
yeah Mike get a cirrus or a cessna instead OK
@jmwintenn8 ай бұрын
piper is owned by brunei not china. go get a cirrus or a diamond.
@tomhaines298 ай бұрын
Piper is not owned by China.
@Bupkus688 ай бұрын
@@tomhaines29I stand corrected. Brunei government owns it. Even better 😂
@MTFBOEING737NG7 ай бұрын
No single engine aircrafts for me. I'd rather fly a triple engine.They're safer and there will be no last minute regrets.